Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Position and Competency Profile: Job Summary
Position and Competency Profile: Job Summary
Department of Education
Postion Title Teacher I Salary Grade 11
Parenthetical Title
Office Unit Effectivity Date
Reports to Principal/ School Heads Page/s
Position Supervised
JOB SUMMARY
QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications
Education Bachelor of Elementary/Secondary/Early Childhood Education or Bachelor's degree plus 18 professional unit in Education
Experience None required
Eligibility RA 1080
Trainings None required
B. Preferred Qualifications
Education BSE/BSEEd/College Graduate with education units (18-21), MA units 18 units
Experience
Eligibility PBET/LET Passers
Trainings In-Service training
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
1 - Poor
• Had 1 of the five parts
• Each part had no description with out
example
• Objectives was stated without
behavioral indicator m
• 50% and below develop high order
thinking skills
• 50% and below attained the desired
learning competencies
• 50% and below based on the approved
budget of work
• Facilitated learning in 5 - Outstanding
the school through
functional lesson plans,
daily logs and
innovative teaching
strategies • The teacher established challenging
and measurable goal/s for student
learning that is aligned with the (DepEd
standards or Philippine Elementary
Learning Competencies (PELC) or the
Philippine Secondary Learning
Competencies (PSLC))curriculum
• The goal reflected a range of student
learner needs.
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
• Results of student
observations/appraisal are 130% and
above used as basis for follow-up.
4 - Very Satisfactory
• Results of student
observations/appraisal are 115-129%
used as basis for follow-up.
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
3 - Satisfactory
• Results of student
observations/appraisal are 100-114%
used as basis for follow-up.
2 - Unsatisfactory
• The teacher did not have a clear focus
for student learning
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
• Results of student
observations/appraisal are 51-99% used
as basis for follow-up.
1 - Poor
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
• Results of student
observations/appraisal are not used as
basis for follow-up.
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
• Initiated discipline of 5 - Outstanding
students including
classroom rules,
guidelines and
individual and group • Pupils were 130% and the above guided
task with in the rating in the observation of classroom rules and
period the guidelines as evidenced by descriptive
rating in the report card/journal
4 - Very Satisfactory
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
• Monitored 5 - Outstanding
attendance, diversity
and appreciation, safe,
positive and motivating
environment, overall • Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of
physical atmosphere, floors, toilets and proper waste disposal
cleanliness and were 130% and above maintained
orderliness of • Attendance checking was 130% and
classrooms including above systematically carried out
proper waste disposal
daily 4 - Very Satisfactory
• Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of
floors, toilets and proper waste disposal
were 115-129% maintained
• Attendance checking was 115-129%
systematically carried out
3 - Satisfactory
• Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of
floors, toilets and proper waste disposal
were 100-114% maintained
• Attendance checking was 100-114%
systematically carried out
2 - Unsatisfactory
• Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of
floors, toilets and proper waste disposal
were 51-99% maintained
• Attendance checking was 51-99%
systematically carried out
1 - Poor
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
• Pupils/Student • Monitored and 5 - Outstanding
Outcomes evaluated and
maintained
pupils/students' • Evidence showed that the teacher
progress with in the purposely plans assessments and varies
rating period assessment choices to match the different
student needs, abilities, and learning
styles.
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
• Attained the required 5 - Outstanding
GSA for grade level and
learning areas 130% and above MPS/GSA
4 - Very Satisfactory
115%-129% MPS/ GSA
3 - Satisfactory
100-114% MPS/GSA
2 - Unsatisfactory
51-99% MPS/GSA
1 - Poor
50% and below MPS/GSA
MFO: 1 • Community
Involvement
• Conducted periodic
PTA
meetings/conferences
5 - Outstanding
130% and above accomplishment with set
BASIC agreements met
4 - Very Satisfactory
EDUCATION 115-129% of planned meetings producing
POLICY
only set agreements and partial
accomplishments of these
3 - Satisfactory
SERVICES
100-114% of planned meetings
conducted producing set of agreements
2 - Unsatisfactory
51-99% of planned meetings conducted
with minimal results
1 - Poor
50% and below of the planned meetings
conducted with no result
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
• Visited parents of
students needing 5 - Outstanding
academic 130% and above accomplishment of set
monitoring/follow-up visits successful interventions
with in the rating
period 4 - Very Satisfactory
115-129% accomplishment of visits with
partial success in implementation of
interventions
3 - Satisfactory
No project/event/activity initiated
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
EDUCATION
3 action research conducted with full
documentation on completion of
interventions.
SERVICES 4 - Very Satisfactory
2 action research conducted with full
documentation on completion of
interventions.
3 - Satisfactory
1 action research conducted with full
documentation on completion of
interventions.
2 - Unsatisfactory
Identified classroom/learning problems
with research proposals
1 - Poor
#RSH#
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA Efficiency,Timelines)
Q
• Produced 5 - Outstanding
publications/ creative
work for school
paper/division Produced publication/creative work
publication with in the published in National Circulation/ DepEd
target date Post/ CSC Newsletters and similar
publications
4 - Very Satisfactory
Produced publication/creative work
published in regional publications
3 - Satisfactory
Produced publication/creative work
published in division publications
2 - Unsatisfactory
Produced publication/creative work
published in school papers
1 - Poor
Unpublished work produced
* Toget the score, the rating is multiplied by th weight assigned
0
OVERAL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS
0 0
Ratee Rater
#RSH#
D DURING EVALUATION
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
#RSH#
RATING
SCORE*
E T Ave.
Approving Officer
#RSH#
COMPETENCIES
Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and Teamwork
2 3.2
purposive and takes into account personal goals and values 4 1 4
Willingly does his/her share of responsibilty.
congruent to that of the organization.
2 Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal
Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by 3 accomplishment across the organization 3 3.4
3
higher goals
Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through gantt charts, checklists, 3
4 3
Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.
3
etc.) to achieve goals.
5 Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others 2 4 4
Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
5
Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across
Professionalism and Ethics 3
organizations to accomplish organizational goals and objectives.
Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Service Orientation
Conduct and Ethical Standards for public officials and employee (RA 1
1 6713). Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
4 4
2
Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into
2 3.6 Takes personal responsibilty for dealing with and/or correcting costumer 3
account the impact of his/her actions and decisions. 3 service issues and concerns 3
Maintains professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of 3 Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women
3
attendance and punctuality, good grooming and communication. 4 empowerment. 3
4
Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates & strategies
4 Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's needs.
3 based on DepEd strategies and directions. 3
Acts with a sense pf urgency and responsibility to meet the 5
Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified
5 organization's needs, improves systems and help others improve
procedures that will further enhance service delivery. 2
their effectiveness. 4
Result Focus Innovation
1 Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions.
Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the
1 Fosters new ideas, processes, and suggests bettter ways to do things (cost
time. 3 3
and/or operational efficiency).
2
Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work Demonstrates an ability to think "beyond the box". Continuously focuses on
2
methods by placing organizational needs before personal needs. improving personal productivity to create higher value and results. 3
3
Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to 3
standard operating procedures correctly and consistently. Able to
Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original
3 produce very satisfactoy quality of work in terms of 3.2 3
ideas or solutions.
usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision
required. 3 4
Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste 4
Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and
4 or inefficiency. May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting organization.
goals set. 4 2
5 Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilties. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to
3 ability to succeed with minimal resources. 3
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrates
DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form -Teachers
CORE SKILLS Computer / ICT Skills
Oral Communication Prepares basic compositions ( e.g., letters, reports, spreadsheets and
1 graphic presentations using Word Processing and Excel. 2
Identifies different computer parts, turns the computer on/off, and work on 2.2
1 Follows instructions accurately. 3.4
a given task with acceptable speed and accuracy and connects computer
4 2 peripherals ( e.g., printers, modems, multi-media projectors, etc.) 3
2 Expresses self clearly, fluently and articulately. 3 3 Prepares simple presentations using Powerpoint. 2
Utilizes technologies to : access information to enhance professional
3 Uses appropriate medium for the message. productivity, assists in conducting research and communicate through local
3 4 and global professional networks. 2
4 Recommends appropriate and updated technology to enhance productivity
Adjust communication style to others. 3 5 and professional practice. 2
5 Guides discussions between and among peers to meet an objective. 4
Written Communication
Knows the different written business communication formats used in
1 the DepEd. 3
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrates
Note: These ratings can be used for the developmental plans of the employee.
DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form - For Teachers
PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION
Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Timeline Resources Needed
Intervention)
0 0 0
Ratee Rater Approving Officer