Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Costs Benefits Graph

    Uploaded by

    RaulFernandoMurilloSilva
    12 views1 page
    This document compares the costs of using polymer lined carbon steel pipes versus corrosion resistant alloy pipes for transporting hydrocarbon products. It shows that polymer lined carbon steel pipes have lower material costs than solid corrosion resistant alloy pipes or clad and lined pipes, with costs increasing as operating temperature rises. Polymer lined pipes are more cost effective for temperatures up to 100-130 degrees Celsius, while corrosion resistant alloy pipes are needed above those temperatures to prevent internal corrosion.

    Original Description:

    Graph Costs Benefits

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document compares the costs of using polymer lined carbon steel pipes versus corrosion resistant alloy pipes for transporting hydrocarbon products. It shows that polymer lined carbon steel pipes have lower material costs than solid corrosion resistant alloy pipes or clad and lined pipes, with costs increasing as operating temperature rises. Polymer lined pipes are more cost effective for temperatures up to 100-130 degrees Celsius, while corrosion resistant alloy pipes are needed above those temperatures to prevent internal corrosion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    12 views1 page

    Costs Benefits Graph

    Uploaded by

    RaulFernandoMurilloSilva
    This document compares the costs of using polymer lined carbon steel pipes versus corrosion resistant alloy pipes for transporting hydrocarbon products. It shows that polymer lined carbon steel pipes have lower material costs than solid corrosion resistant alloy pipes or clad and lined pipes, with costs increasing as operating temperature rises. Polymer lined pipes are more cost effective for temperatures up to 100-130 degrees Celsius, while corrosion resistant alloy pipes are needed above those temperatures to prevent internal corrosion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Internal Corrosion Protection in Pipelines Transporting Hydrocarbon

    Products Comparing costs of Polymer Lined Carbon Steel pipes


    with Corrosion Resistant Alloy (CRA) pipes

    100%

    Steel/CRA (Lined & Clad)


    Solid 25Cr SMLS Solid CRA pipe based on 12” x 25.4mmWT
    Clad and lined pipe based on 12” x 22.4mm WT X65+ 3mm CRA liner
    80%
    625 clad
    825 clad
    Percentage Comparison

    60%

    625 lined
    40% Material Costs Only
    Excl. fabrication and installation costs 825 lined

    CS Host + Polymer Liner


    130°c PVDF
    25% Operating temperature (ªC)
    in Hydrocarbon service
    PA12
    20%
    100°c
    Polymer Lined pipe based on rate / tonne for seamless X65 PEX
    85°c
    15%
    Wall thickness is 12” x 22.4mm WT plus liner thickness as designed by SWL 50°c PE100

    10%

    You might also like