‘Comparison of Tableau vs. Qlikview Business Criteria ‘Assessmeri|icxo| _Assessment]san] Ee ‘asl 7 shortest] —6]| Both ierease poductiy “Good|—6| RAM Limite] — 6 Tabloau usos veual RAM] rie for $1,908] —«] —— aboutsa000] —a id ‘Sik min TOusers| 6] Bit] 3 nen Been epenve ‘Support fees [year 20%| 20%| 6 305 Platform Tors or Digtall —8| — Special eense| —6]| —— Requies nepotaton ‘Overall cost ore Average] —s| — Tigh, neess RAD] Tableau costs os] Enterprise ‘Good fo SME] —6| Good for Su] 6 aes Fasiesi growth] 6] Public company! 7|| Both 1 product company] are Tabiau Pubie| —1| —~ Growing Fasll 6) Tableau Leads] Data: TAbowe Average] —€ ‘Average| 4] Batow Average] 3 argo] 7] Givi 10007 partnor ‘Visusizaton Voeaitee mer Data Vary Good] Excolnt Weryeoos) Exastam|—p]|_liiew tor mate (ffine Viewer Fioe Reader] —o| — Personal Eaten] —6]| Tableau has beter opto ‘Knalyats Desktop | Tableau Pre| 8 —Gikvow Doskeo| 9] | Dashbosrd Suppor Excotion| 9 Excolont| 9 ‘Wed Client Exceion| Very Goed] —7 Mobile Conte: ‘Very Good] Dost variety| Visual Contros VeryGood Very Good 8 Utinteractivit ‘Geos, no Moll — 6] “Good. WOT epee] — el] Walt Dosument areca “Technical Creeria Teamea Data integration Excolien] ‘Very Goed] || Tableau isa wirner Development “Tabieau Pre| 5] Gikviow Developer] —7| — Gikview nas Scritng oes ‘VeryGood} 7) Excellent] 9) Gikview is faster integration win GIS Excellent] — a] “ivaragal —8]| Tableau haa Mapping al] Bot nave caicultea Fie 3 z 4 2{|Tablaau reads SSAS| 7 i ql A Tableau isa winner 4 2a 7a