12 Chiropractic Management of Spinal Fractures.
and Dislocations
DAVID J. ROWE
Successful ehitopracic manegement of spinal factres
and dsieations is dependenton the proper pretreatment
‘evaluation ofthe injury, treatnent repimes which are bio-
‘mechanically sound and eeral when necessary
‘Although up to 9% of presenting patients may have
‘compression fractures (I), the protocols for management
‘ofboth chroni and acute lesons remain illdefined due
to the fac that relatively litle documentation exists
regarding chiropractic management. However, the few
Feported cases (2) provide & promising foundation for
Fate work i his ara,
Inthe attempt to ad an injured individual, the doctor
‘must take heed of the Hipperatic oath: “Primum non
focere™ (above all doth paint no harm). tis with this
perspective thatthe author wll expire the existing body
Bt knowledge of spinal fractures and dislocations, while
‘Seveloping rationale for chitopactc cae ofthese often
‘isabling disorder. Given the risks of adjusting patients
‘with fractures oF dislocations. more extensive invesipa-
tion is often required (eg, MRI, CT, tomography) in
managing these cases. Before beginning treatment, the
‘doctor must always evalvate thee sill and experience to
‘etermine if hey ate capable of managing these types of
disorders
Fractures have been organized inthis chapter accord-
ing 10 anatomical repions with an emphasis on their
iajr injury vectors an eff to encourage te ciro-
practor to think in mechanistic terms when analyzing
froumatic injuries and in creating logical strategies for
their treatment. Case studies, when availabe, have been
provided to llustrate the chiropractic management ofp
hl fsctures and dislocations. The practioner must keep
{in mind that every patient should be evaluated individ
wally and any treatment coune dependent upon the spe
cic indings and potential ists ofthat particular cas.
"The scarcity of published reports necessitates a more
{nensve profesional partcgation in exploring and doe.
‘Umenting the chiropractic option for the teatment of
spinal Fractures and dislocations. Through the accumu-
Jaton of published reports of successes and flues, this
small database can be expanded
“The foremost concer in ealuatng the patient with @
potentially devastating lesion resolving the stability ste
{us of the injury, since that isthe determining salty
factr.
‘SPINAL STABILITY
‘According to White and Panjabi (3), spinal stability is
‘efned as that situation where a spine placed unde nor-
tal phyiologic load is able to resist further postional