Popular Religion and Appropriation: The Example of Corpus Christ
Eighteenth-Century Cuzco
David Cahill
Latin American Research Review, Vol. 31, No. 2. (1996), pp. 67-110.
ble URL:
bitp://links jstor.org/sici?sici=0023-879 1% 281996%2931%3A2%3C67%3APRAATE%3E2.0.CO%3B2-B
Latin American Research Review is currently published by Uni Press.
ersity of T
‘Your use of the ISTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR’s Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
butp:/\vww jstor.orglabout/terms.huml. ISTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you
have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and
you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
hup:/www jstor-org/journals/texas. hum
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the sereen or
printed page of such transmission,
JSTOR isan independent not-for-profit organization dedicated to ereating and preserving a digital archive of
scholarly journals, For more information regarding JSTOR, please contaet support @jstor.org,
upswwwjstorore/
Mon Noy 27 21:38:31 2006POPULAR RELIGION
AND APPROPRIATION:
The Example of Corpus Christi
in Eighteenth-Century Cuzco
David Cahill
University of New South Wales
Historical studies of Andean popular religion have largely been
confined to the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, in the main exegeses
of the early chronicles and the rich materials on “extirpation of idolatry.”!
‘The eighteenth and nineteenth centuries remain largely terra incognita,
while information on twentieth-century popular religion has come pri-
marily from ethnographic field studies. More recently, historians and
anthropologists have begun to explore the religious or messianic dimen-
sion of the great uprisings of 1780-1783 in the southern Andean sierra,
taking their cue from a 1955 essay by John Rowe on a purported “Inca
1. A useful although controversial overview of studies of Andean religion is Henrique
Urbano, "Representacones colectivas yarqueologia mental en los Andes," Allunchi 17, no.
20 (982):33-85. Especially important are two historically informed anthropological reat
iments: Michael J Salinow, Pilgrims of the Andes: Regional Cults in Cusco (Washington, DC:
Smithsonian Institution Press, 1987), and Deborah Poole, “Los santuariosreligiosos en la
‘economia regional andina (Cusco),”Allpanchis 16, na 19 (1982)79-116. sallnow also provides
4 full bibliography on Andean festive culture that updates in certain respects that of
Urbano. The leading works on colonlal Andean religion include Johann Specker, Die Mis-
sionsmethode in Spanisch-Amerita in 16, jkrhundert (Chur, Switzerland: Beckenried, 1953),
Pierre Duviols, Li lutte conte les religions autochtones dans le Pro coli: "Lextinpation de
idole” entre 1832 ef 1600 (Lima: Institut Prancas d'Etudes Andines, 197), witha Span
‘sh translation published as Ladesruccion de las religines andinas (durante a conquistay
nia) (Mexico City: Universidad Nacional AutGnoma de México, 1977); Lorenzo Huertas
lejos, Li eligi en wa sociedad rural andina (siglo XVI) (Ayacucho: UNSC Huamanga,
1981) Manel M. Marzal, La transformacion rligiow peraana (Lima: Pontificia Universidad
CCatsiea, 1983}; Sabine MacCormack, Reliion in the Andes: Vision and Traagination in Early
Colonial Peru (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999; Catlciomo y extipacin de
iolatrias, silos XVI-XVIl, edited by Gabriela Ramos and Henrique Urbano (Cuzco: Centro
Bartolomé de las Casas, 1093); Kenneth Mills, An Evil Lst fo View? An Inestigtion of Post
Evangelization Anvoon Religion in Mid-Colonial Peru (Liverpool, Engl: University of Liver-
pol, 1991) and Mils, "The Limits of Religious Coercion in Mid-Colonial Peru” Past and
Present, no. 15 (1994)84-121. The debate has been given an Important flip with the
publication of sections ofthe extant documentation on “idolatra” in the seventeenth cen
ary im Cultura andina yreprein: Process estes de Uoatrie y beers, Caatamo, ito
XVII edited by Pierre Duviols(Cxzco: Centro Bartolomé de Is Casas, 1986); and in Amar
‘eos hechiceosy eels, edited by Ana Sinchez (Cuzco: Centro Bartolomé de las Casas,
1990.
Latin Ameria Ressrch Review volume 31, number 2 1996 o7Latin American Research Review
rnationalism.”? Yet between early-colonial historiography and twen-
tieth-century ethnography, one encounters a virtual silence of two centuries.
This hiatus is largely explained by the lack of printed sources for the
period and the consequent need to sieve scarce data from archives. Also
pertinent is the fact that by the end of the seventeenth century, the tide of
‘arly-modern missionary zeal had ebbed. That waning of interest in ex
tirpatory endeavors by church and state alike coincided with a diminu-
tion of witch-hunts in Europe generally and a decline in the influence and
fervor of the Inquisition in Spain specifically
Such lack of zeal also appears to have represented something of an
accommodation between church and state on the one hand and Andean
popular religiosity on the other. Beliefs and practices once viewed as
incorrigibly heretical might henceforth be incorporated or tolerated as
superstitious or magical, as elements of a popular culture grounded in
ignorance that might nonetheless coexist comfortably on the margins of
post-Tridentine Catholicism.‘ This belated tolerance was no doubt facili-
tated by official conviction that the more outrageous native Andean reli-
gious practices had already been eradicated or at least driven under-
ground. Yet this newfound tolerance had its limits: the state (even more
than the church) continued to proscribe features of religious praxis deemed
malign, thereby continuing to set strict parameters for the permissible in
religious observance. The fragmentary post-1700 data on native Andean
2. See ohn H. Rowe, “El movimiento nacional inca dl siglo XVI” Recs Universtri
43, no 107 1954) 17-4 Tas article draws heal on George Kubler, “The Quechua in the
Colonial Wor” in Handbok of South American Ids ede by Jalan Ft Seward (Wash
Sngton, DC: Smithsonian Insteation, 1946), 2331-410
The corespondence between these episodes and the campaign to extirpteilatey in
Peru should not be pushed to far See, for example, the remarks of Antonio Acosta Kod
"ger in “La extirpacion de as doltias en el er: Origin y desarrollo de las campus
Revit Andina 5.1 (987) 171-95
“There was les tolerance of popular religiosity in Europe, for which ste the two key
text Peter Burke, Popular Calta Early Madern Europe London: Temple Sith, 1979 and
Robert Muchembled, Popuiar Culture ani Ete Culture in France, H0021730, translated by
[dia Cochrane (Baton Rouge La: Lousiana State University Pres, 1985; orginally pub
lished in 978) Foran apprasl and comparison, see Wiliam Belk, “Popular Cult and
Ete Repression in asi Madern Europe, oural of lnterdiseplnary Mistry 1.1 (1980)
57-103 For crigues of approaches to the study of popular religion, sce Stuart Clatk,
"french Historians and Eatly Modern Poplar Cult ast and Present, no. 100 (889)62~
99; moat recently, Gerald Stause, “The Dilemma of Popular History” Pst and Present, no
132 (891)130—0, and the related debate with Wiliam Beik 10-29. A pioneering meth
‘edologial esayof ending values Natalie Zemon Davis, Some Tasks and Themes in he
Study of Poplar Religion” in The Pursuit of Holiness Late Mtevl and Renasanee Rel
‘in, edited by Charis Tinkaus and Hisko A: Oberman (Leiden, The Netherlands: E
Bil, 197, updated to some exten in Davis, “From ‘Popular Religion’ to Religious Cal
ture,” im Rofrmation Europe: A Gude to Resarch, edited by Steven £. Ozment (St. Loss,
Mos Center for Reformation Resarch, 982) Many of the methodological esues are dis
‘ssc in Robert Serine, "ls History of Popular Cultore Possible? Hatory
“dvs 10, no. 2 (1989)475-5, An article with msportant consequences forthe Mt
‘of popula religion is Peter Burke's “Smengths and Weaknesses ofthe History of Mental
ihe Hltory of Europe Ids. 5 (980°499"51
68