Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chap2 PDF
Chap2 PDF
• Short line approximation for lines that are less than 80 km long.
• Medium line approximation for lines whose lengths are between 80 km to 250 km.
• Long line model for lines that are longer than 250 km.
These models will be discussed in this chapter. However before that let us introduce the
ABCD parameters that are used for relating the sending end voltage and current to the
receiving end voltage and currents.
Consider the power system shown in Fig. 2.1. In this the sending and receiving end
voltages are denoted by VS and VR respectively. Also the currents IS and IR are entering and
leaving the network respectively. The sending end voltage and current are then defined in
terms of the ABCD parameters as
VS = AVR + BI R (2.1)
I S = CVR + DI R (2.2)
VS
A= (2.3)
VR I R =0
This implies that A is the ratio of sending end voltage to the open circuit receiving end
voltage. This quantity is dimension less. Similarly,
VS
B= Ω (2.4)
IR VR = 0
i.e., B, given in Ohm, is the ratio of sending end voltage and short circuit receiving end
current. In a similar way we can also define
IS
C= mho (2.5)
VR I R =0
1.31
IS
D= (2.6)
IR V =0
R
The shunt capacitance for a short line is almost negligible. The series impedance is
assumed to be lumped as shown in Fig. 2.2. If the impedance per km for an l km long line is
z0 = r + jx, then the total impedance of the line is Z = R + jX = lr + jlx. The sending end
voltage and current for this approximation are given by
VS = VR + ZI R (2.7)
IS = IR (2.8)
A = D = 1, B = Z Ω and C = 0 (2.9)
Medium transmission lines are modeled with lumped shunt admittance. There are two
different representations − nominal-π and nominal-T depending on the nature of the network.
These two are discussed below.
In this representation the lumped series impedance is placed in the middle while the
shunt admittance is divided into two equal parts and placed at the two ends. The nominal-π
representation is shown in Fig. 2.3. This representation is used for load flow studies, as we
shall see later. Also a long transmission line can be modeled as an equivalent π-network for
load flow studies.
1.32
Let us define three currents I1, I2 and I3 as indicated in Fig. 2.3. Applying KCL at
nodes M and N we get
I s = I1 + I 2 = I1 + I 3 + I R
Y Y (2.10)
= Vs + VR + I R
2 2
Again
Y
Vs = ZI 2 + VR = Z VR + I R + VR
2
(2.11)
YZ
= + 1VR + ZI R
2
Y YZ Y
Is = + 1VR + ZI R + VR + I R
2 2 2 (2.12)
YZ YZ
= Y + 1VR + + 1 I R
4 2
Therefore from (2.11) and (2.12) we get the following ABCD parameters of the
nominal-π representation
YZ
A= D= + 1 (2.13)
2
B=ZΩ (2.14)
YZ
C = Y + 1 mho (2.15)
4
In this representation the shunt admittance is placed in the middle and the series
impedance is divided into two equal parts and these parts are placed on either side of the
shunt admittance. The nominal-T representation is shown in Fig. 2.4. Let us denote the
midpoint voltage as VM. Then the application of KCL at the midpoint results in
1.33
VS − VM V − VR
= YVM + M
Z 2 Z 2
2
VM = (VS + VR ) (2.16)
YZ + 4
VM − VR
IR = (2.17)
Z 2
YZ YZ
Vs = + 1VR + Z + 1 I R (2.18)
2 4
I S = YVM + I R (2.19)
YZ
I R = YVR + + 1 I R (2.20)
2
YZ
A= D= + 1 (2.21)
2
YZ
B = Z + 1 Ω (2.22)
4
C = Y mho (2.23)
1.34
For accurate modeling of the transmission line we must not assume that the
parameters are lumped but are distributed throughout line. The single-line diagram of a long
transmission line is shown in Fig. 2.5. The length of the line is l. Let us consider a small strip
∆x that is at a distance x from the receiving end. The voltage and current at the end of the
strip are V and I respectively and the beginning of the strip are V + ∆V and I + ∆I
respectively. The voltage drop across the strip is then ∆V. Since the length of the strip is ∆x,
the series impedance and shunt admittance are z ∆x and y ∆x. It is to be noted here that the
total impedance and admittance of the line are
Z = z × l and Y = y × l (2.24)
∆V
∆V = Iz ∆x ⇒ = Iz (2.25)
∆x
dV
= Iz (2.26)
dx
Now for the current through the strip, applying KCL we get
∆I = (V + ∆V ) y ∆x = Vy ∆x + ∆Vy ∆x (2.27)
The second term of the above equation is the product of two small quantities and therefore
can be neglected. For ∆x → 0 we then have
dI
= Vy (2.28)
dx
d dV dI
=z
dx dx dx
1.35
d 2V
− yzV = 0 (2.29)
dx 2
The roots of the above equation are located at ±√(yz). Hence the solution of (2.29) is of the
form
V = A1e x yz
+ A2e − x yz
(2.30)
dV
= A1 yz e x yz
− A2 yz e − x yz
(2.31)
dx
1 dV A1 x yz A2 − x yz
I= = e − e (2.32)
z dx z y z y
z
ZC = Ω which is called the characteristic impedance (2.33)
y
γ = yz which is called the propagation constant (2.34)
Then (2.30) and (2.32) can be written in terms of the characteristic impedance and
propagation constant as
Let us assume that x = 0. Then V = VR and I = IR. From (2.35) and (2.36) we then get
VR = A1 + A2 (2.37)
A A
IR = 1 − 2 (2.38)
ZC ZC
Solving (2.37) and (2.38) we get the following values for A1 and A2.
VR + Z C I R V − ZC I R
A1 = and A2 = R
2 2
1.36
Also note that for l = x we have V = VS and I = IS. Therefore replacing x by l and substituting
the values of A1 and A2 in (2.35) and (2.36) we get
VR + Z C I R γl VR − Z C I R −γl
VS = e + e (2.39)
2 2
V Z + I R γl VR Z C − I R −γl
IS = R C e − e (2.40)
2 2
Noting that
The ABCD parameters of the long transmission line can then be written as
A = D = cosh γl (2.43)
B = Z C sinh γl Ω (2.44)
sinh γl
C= mho (2.45)
ZC
Example 2.1: Consider a 500 km long line for which the per kilometer line impedance
and admittance are given respectively by z = 0.1 + j0.5145 Ω and y = j3.1734 × 10−6 mho.
Therefore
79° + 90°
γl = yz × l = 0.5241 × 3.1734 × 10− 6 × 500∠
2
= 0.6448∠84.5° = 0.0618 + j 0.6419
We shall now use the following two formulas for evaluating the hyperbolic forms
Therefore from (2.43) to (2.45) the ABCD parameters of the system can be written as
A = D = 0.8025 + j 0.037
B = 43.4 + j 240.72 Ω
C = −2.01 × 10− 5 + j 0.0015
∆∆∆
The π-equivalent of a long transmission line is shown Fig. 2.6. In this the series
impedance is denoted by Z′ while the shunt admittance is denoted by Y′. From (2.21) to
(2.23) the ABCD parameters are defined as
Y′Z′
A= D= + 1 (2.46)
2
B = Z′Ω (2.47)
Y′Z′
C = Y ′ + 1 mho (2.48)
4
z sinh γl sinh γl
Z ′ = Z C sinh γl = sinh γl = zl =Z Ω (2.49)
y l yz γl
where Z = zl is the total impedance of the line. Again comparing (2.43) with (2.46) we get
Y′Z′ Y′
cosh γl = +1 = Z C sinh γl + 1 (2.50)
2 2
where Y = yl is the total admittance of the line. Note that for small values of l, sinh γl = γl and
tanh (γl/2) = γl/2. Therefore from (2.49) we get Z = Z′ and from (2.51) we get Y = Y′. This
implies that when the length of the line is small, the nominal-π representation with lumped
parameters is fairly accurate. However the lumped parameter representation becomes
erroneous as the length of the line increases. The following example illustrates this.
Example 2.2: Consider the transmission line given in Example 2.1. The equivalent
system parameters for both lumped and distributed parameter representation are given in
Table 2.1 for three different line lengths. It can be seen that the error between the parameters
increases as the line length increases.
For a lossless line, the line resistance is assumed to be zero. The characteristic
impedance then becomes a pure real number and it is often referred to as the surge
impedance. The propagation constant becomes a pure imaginary number. Defining the
propagation constant as γ = jβ and replacing l by x we can rewrite (2.41) and (2.42) as
The term surge impedance loading or SIL is often used to indicate the nominal
capacity of the line. The surge impedance is the ratio of voltage and current at any point
along an infinitely long line. The term SIL or natural power is a measure of power delivered
by a transmission line when terminated by surge impedance and is given by
V02
SIL = Pn = (2.54)
ZC
At SIL ZC = VR/IR and hence from equations (2.52) and (2.53) we get
V = V R e γx = V R e − jβx (2.55)
1.39
This implies that as the distance x changes, the magnitudes of the voltage and current in the
above equations do not change. The voltage then has a flat profile all along the line. Also as
ZC is real, V and I are in phase with each other all through out the line. The phase angle
difference between the sending end voltage and the receiving end voltage is then θ = βl. This
is shown in Fig. 2.7.
For the analysis presented below we assume that the magnitudes of the voltages at the
two ends are the same. The sending and receiving voltages are given by
where δ is angle between the sources and is usually called the load angle. As the total length
of the line is l, we replace x by l to obtain the sending end voltage from (2.39) as
VR + Z C I R jθ VR − Z C I R − jθ
VS = VS ∠δ = e + e = VR cosθ + jZ C I R sin θ (2.58)
2 2
VS ∠δ − VR cosθ
IR = (2.59)
jZ C sin θ
Substituting (2.59) in (2.52), the voltage equation at a point in the transmission line that is at
a distance x from the receiving end is obtained as
− j VS ∠δ cos βx − VR cos(θ − βx )
I= (2.61)
ZC sin θ
1.40
Example 2.3: Consider a 500 km long line given in Example 2.1. Neglect the line
resistance such that the line impedance is z = j0.5145 Ω per kilometer. The line admittance
remains the same as that given in Example 2.1. Then
z j 0.5145
ZC = = = 402.6524 Ω
y j 3.1734 × 10− 6
and
Therefore θ = βl = 0.6380 rad. It is assumed that the magnitude of the sending and receiving
end voltages are equal to 1.0 per unit with the line being unloaded, i.e., VS = VR = 1∠0° per
unit. The voltage and current profiles of the line for this condition is shown in Fig. 2.8. The
maximum voltage is 1.0533 per unit, while the current varies between –0.3308 per unit to
0.3308 per unit. Note that 1 per unit current is equal to 1/ZC.
∆∆∆
When the system is unloaded, the receiving end current is zero (IR = 0). Therefore we
can rewrite (2.58) as
VS = VS ∠δ = VR cosθ (2.62)
Substituting the above equation in (2.52) and (2.53) we get the voltage and current for the
unloaded system as
VS ∠δ
V= cos βx (2.63)
cosθ
1.41
j VS ∠δ
I= sin βx (2.64)
Z C cosθ
Example 2.4: Consider the system given in Example 2.3. It is assumed that the system
is unloaded with VS = VR = 1∠0° per unit. The voltage and current profiles for the unloaded
system is shown in Fig. 2.9. The maximum voltage of 1.2457 per unit occurs at the receiving
end while the maximum current of 0.7428 per unit is at the sending end. The current falls
monotonically from the sending end and voltage rises monotonically to the receiving end.
This rise in voltage under unloaded or lightly loaded condition is called Ferranti effect.
∆∆∆
Fig. 2.9 Voltage and current profile over an unloaded transmission line.
The mid point voltage of a transmission line is of significance for the reactive
compensation of transmission lines. To obtain an expression of the mid point voltage, let us
assume that the line is loaded (i.e., the load angle δ is not equal to zero). At the mid point of
the line we have x = l/2 such that βx = θ/2. Let us denote the midpoint voltage by VM. Let us
also assume that the line is symmetric, i.e., VS = VR = V. We can then rewrite equation
(2.60) to obtain
VM =
(V∠δ + V )sin (θ 2)
sin θ
Again noting that
V cos(δ 2 ) δ
VM =
cos(θ 2 )
∠
2
( ) (2.65)
The phase angle of the mid point voltage is half the load angle always. Also the mid point
voltage and current are in phase, i.e., the power factor at this point is unity. The variation in
the magnitude of voltage with changes in load angle is maximum at the mid point. The
voltage at this point decreases with the increase in δ. Also as the power through a lossless line
is constant through out its length and the mid point power factor is unity, the mid point
current increases with an increase in δ.
Example 2.5: Consider the transmission line discussed in Example 2.4. Assuming the
magnitudes of both sending and receiving end voltages to be 1.0 per unit, we can compute the
magnitude of the mid point voltage as the load angle (δ) changes. This is given in Table 2.2.
The variation in voltage with δ is shown in Fig. 2.10.
Table 2.2 Changes in the mid point voltage magnitude with load angle
It is of some interest to find the Thevenin equivalent of the transmission line looking
from the mid point. It is needless to say that the Thevenin voltage will be the same as the mid
point voltage. To determine the Thevenin impedance we first find the short circuit current at
the mid point terminals. This is computed through superposition principle, as the short circuit
current will flow from both the sources connected at the two ends. From (2.52) we compute
the short circuit current due to source VS (= V∠δ) as
V∠δ
I SC1 = (2.67)
jZ C sin (θ 2 )
V
I SC 2 = (2.68)
jZ C sin(θ 2 )
Thus we have
1.43
2V cos(δ 2 ) δ
I SC = I SC1 + I SC 2 =
V∠δ + V
=
jZ C sin(θ 2 ) jZ C sin(θ 2 )
∠
2
( ) (2.69)
Z TH = jX TH =
VM
I SC
Z
= j C tan θ
2 2
( ) (2.70)
The power flow through a lossless line can be given by the mid point voltage and
current equations given in (2.66) and (2.67). Since the power factor at this point is unity, real
power over the line is given by
V2
Pe = V M I M∗ = sin δ (2.71)
Z C sin θ
If V = V0, the rated voltage we can rewrite the above expression in terms of the natural power
as
Pn
Pe = sin δ (2.72)
sin θ
( )
Z C sin θ ≅ Z Cθ = l ω lc τ = ω lτ = X
c
(2.73)
1.44
where X is the total reactance of the line. Equation (2.71) then can be modified to obtain the
well known power transfer relation for the short line approximation as
V2
Pe = sin δ (2.74)
X
In general it is not necessary for the magnitudes of the sending and receiving end
voltages to be same. The power transfer relation given in (2.72) will not be valid in that case.
To derive a general expression for power transfer, we assume
V S = V S ∠δ and V R = V R ∠0 o
If the receiving end real and reactive powers are denoted by PR and QR respectively, we can
write from (2.52)
PR − jQ R
V S = V S (cos δ + j sin δ ) = V R cos θ + jZ C sin θ
VR
Z CQR
V S cos δ = V R cos θ + sin θ (2.75)
VR
and
Z C PR
V S sin δ = sin θ (2.76)
VR
Rearranging (2.76) we get the power flow equation for a losslees line as
VS VR
Pe = PS = PR = sin δ (2.77)
Z C sin θ
To derive expressions for the reactive powers, we rearrange (2.75) to obtain the
reactive power delivered to the receiving end as
2
V S V R cos δ − V R cos θ
QR = (2.78)
Z C sin θ
− j V S cos θ∠δ − V R
IS = (2.79)
ZC sin θ
2
j V S cos θ∠ − δ − V R V S cos θ V S V R ∠δ
PS + jQ S = V S I = V S ∠δ
∗
= j − j
sin θ Z C sin θ Z C sin θ
S
ZC
Equating the imaginary parts of the above equation we get the following expression for the
reactive generated by the source
2
V S cos θ − V S V R cos δ
QS = (2.80)
Z C sin θ
QL = QS − QR =
(V S
2
+ VR
2
)cosθ − 2 V S V R cos δ
(2.81)
Z C sin θ
It is important to note that if the magnitude of the voltage at the two ends is equal, i.e.,
VS = VR = V, the reactive powers at the two ends become negative of each other, i.e.,
QS = QR. The net reactive power absorbed by the line then becomes twice the sending end
reactive power, i.e., QL = 2QS. Furthermore, since cos θ ≈ 1for small values of θ, the reactive
powers at the two ends for a short transmission line are given by
V 2 cosθ − V 2 cos δ V 2
QS = ≈ (1 − cos δ ) = −QR (2.82)
Z C sin θ X
The reactive power absorbed by the line under this condition is given by
2V 2
QL = (1 − cos δ ) (2.83)
X
Example 2.5: Consider a short, lossless transmission line with a line reactance of 0.5
per unit. We assume that the magnitudes of both sending and receiving end voltages to be 1.0
per unit. The real power transfer over the line and reactive power consumed by the line are
shown in Fig. 2.11. The maximum real power is 2.0 per unit and it occurs for δ = 90°. Also
the maximum reactive power consumed by the line occurs at δ = 180° and it has a value of 8
per unit.
∆∆∆
1.46
Fig. 2.11 Real power flow and reactive power consumed by a transmission line.