Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Blog

    Uploaded by

    kevinfolta
    87 views6 pages
    This was the original blog posted 8/29/2018. The revision is much easier to read and reflects a higher clarity in considering a very bad situation.

    Original Title

    blog

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This was the original blog posted 8/29/2018. The revision is much easier to read and reflects a higher clarity in considering a very bad situation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    87 views6 pages

    Blog

    Uploaded by

    kevinfolta
    This was the original blog posted 8/29/2018. The revision is much easier to read and reflects a higher clarity in considering a very bad situation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 6
    2 Techriclinfo Xb MesiaFormulaonseat x \ [) Beevier Editorial Syste” x \ [} HORT2Z302(N.pef —_ \( AD Scholane Manuscripts x \ WE TweetDeck eotablogspotcomy sje hecounss Moai Ena @ Bi rato D F percrinst Pat Bolgy2 BE Feet FI Vine © creme cengstore —\ Thetany Namestes IO STOR Cent ne a Biofortiied: Write First, Ask Questions Later 1'm truly disappointed. One minute of fact checking would have saved us a lot of hassle. 8 makes a number of false claims, and they have made a tremendous mistake. It wll not end well for Biology Fortified Inc. Now when students check their professor's background, the audience googles the speaker, or parents decide what scientist is okay to speak to thelr kids, theyll find a trusted science ‘website claiming he's not worth their trust. Thanks guys. They have in essence done what Gary Ruskin and Paul Thacker do on a regular basis. They rely on FOIA documents and conjecture to draw a conclusion, and in this case they are wrong. Dead wrong, The community should never forget how the folks at Biofortified wrote the story, never asked me a single question about the documents they received from a FOIA request, and have no idea what the nature of the work truly was. Unacceptable. Here are the facts: 1. In May of 2017 a law firm contacted me and asked about my willingness to analyze some data. It fit perfectly Into my area of expertise, but was not work consistent with my appointment at the University of Florida, and | would be compensated for my time. 2. Because it was not university work, | filed out the forms for outside work. There was no check box for the nature of the work | was planning to do (as a subject matter expert), s0 | checked "consultant". In an attached letter 1 would clarify the nature of the work with my university administrators in a letter (that Blofortiied also has) that says explicitly that the work was not consulting eotablogspotcomy 2 \(B Mesiaformulations pat ioe Ei restock a As23.pet HG Beever Eton ate x | [5 HORTIESGE ech XD ScholnGrne Maruscnpts x | WE TneetDecke Pat Bolgy2 BE Feet FI Vine © creme cengstore —\ Thetany Namestes IO STOR Cent ne ay 18,2007, Dear Dr. Burns, have been requested to serve at a compensated expert in an arbitration hearing between two parties. This work isnot formally consultation work, it is more work as a profesional witness, although there sro Wal. The work s beyond my normal job a How convenient? Seems like Karl Haro Von Mogel and Anastasia Bodnar don't post the note to my dean where | state "This work is not formally consultation work" and that it did not easily ft into a box. They follow the GM Watch model of cherry picking the most damaging language and ignoring the verbiage that does not fit their story. 3. Under my retention agreement with the law firm, the work was to remain confidential. | could not discuss the nature of the work, the parties involved, or the type of analysis. It was not consulting. It was not professional witness work as it was not fora trial. | was a subject matter expert, providing analysis toward an outcome. This was analysis of public university

    You might also like