MGMT1001 Assignment 2 REPORT Feedback s1 2012

Weighting: 30% of total course assessment

Student Name
Date Received Student No.

Criteria O S U Mark
Report content and utilisation of course theory
Overall quality of analysis in terms of the following areas;
- Groups & Teams /30%
- Leadership /30%
Evidence of self reflective practice /10%
Research supporting the report
Quality of academic research
- Appropriate number of references sourced (min 6)
from appropriate journals/ databases
- Relevance of sources to your argument /10%
Structure and formatting
Appropriate structure (introduction, body, conclusion) and /5%
inclusion of compulsory appendices
Clarity of expression & grammar /5%
Correct in-text citations and bibliography format using ASB /5%
Harvard style
Correct document formatting as per requirements in section /5%
4.6 of the Course Outline and length (2500 words +/- 10%)
Penalty(ies) applied: ……
TOTAL %
O = Outstanding; S = Satisfactory; U = Unsatisfactory
NB: Marking criteria only applies to the student’s own original work.
General Comments:
Criteria Outstanding
Report content and utilisation of course theory
Overall quality of analysis in terms of Demonstrates critical application of appropriate
Groups and teams MGMT1001 “Groups and teams” concepts and
theories to individual/team’s Everest experience
Marks: 22.5-30
Overall quality of analysis in terms of Demonstrates critical application of appropriate
Leadership MGMT1001 “Leadership” concepts and theories
to the individual’s and team’s Everest experience
Marks: 22.5-30
Evidence of self reflective practice Critically examines their own behaviour and
feelings; a level of consistency in the portrayal of
the Everest events among group members.
Marks: 7.5 - 10
Research supporting the report - Quality of academic research
- Appropriate number of references  Demonstrated use of more than 6 academic
sources (min 6) from appropriate sources
journals/ databases  Selection and use of sources highly
- Relevance of sources to your appropriate to the analysis of the Everest
argument experience. Mark: 7.5 - 10
Structure and formatting
Appropriate structure (introduction, Report is well-structured and coherent, with a
body, conclusion) and inclusion of clear and effective introduction and conclusion;
compulsory appendices body is logically sequenced with clear transitions
between parts; paragraphs are well-developed.
Mark: 4 - 5
Clarity of expression and grammar No spelling mistakes, absence of contractions,
appropriate academic tone, well constructed
paragraphs
Mark: 4 - 5
Correct in-text citations and bibliography Referencing is consistently accurate using
format using ASB Harvard style Harvard style (as per ASB guide)
Mark: 4 - 5
Correct document formatting as per Report is within the Word Limit boundaries and
requirements in section 4.3.1 of the confirms to all formatting requirements
Course Outline and length (2500 words
+/- 10%) Mark: 4 - 5
NB: Marking criteria only applies to the student’s own original work.
Satisfactory
Describes team processes and results. Some
application of appropriate concepts or theory.
Mark: 15-22
Describes leadership experiences of
individual/team. Some application of
appropriate concepts or theory.
Mark: 15-22
Describes their own behaviour and feelings
Mark: 5 - 7
 Demonstrated use of 6 academic sources
 Selection and use of sources broadly
appropriate to analysis of Everest
experience
Mark: 5 -7
Report is structured with an introduction and
conclusion and body with clearly defined parts,
although these could be developed more
effectively / be more coherent. Transition
between paragraphs could be improved.
Mark: 2.5- 3.5
Some spelling mistakes and rare use of
contractions, ‘informal’ tone (word choice,
spelling, or slang); appropriate paragraph
structure
Mark: 2.5- 3.5
Referencing is mainly accurate using Harvard
style (as per ASB guide)
Mark: 2.5- 3.5
Report is within the Word Limit boundaries but
does not conform to all formatting
requirements
Mark: 2.5- 3.5
Unsatisfactory
Little to no discussion of team processes and
results. Minimal application of appropriate
concepts or theory
Mark: 0 – 14.5
Little to no discussion of leadership experiences
of individual/team. Minimal application of
appropriate concepts or theory
Mark: 0 – 14.5
Little to no description of their own behavior and
feelings/describes events. May describe other
team members
Mark: 0 - 5
 Demonstrated use of less than 6 academic
sources or non-academic sources
 Sources selected are largely irrelevant.
Mark: 0 - 4.5
Report poorly structured; introduction and/or
conclusion not clear or effective; body not clearly
structured; paragraphs/sections not well-
developed; ineffective transitions between
paragraphs, use of lists/ bullet points.
Mark: 0 - 2
Multiple spelling mistakes, extensive use of
contractions, poor sentence construction,
‘informal’ tone (word choice, spelling or slang)
poor structure (e.g., 2 sentence paragraphs)
Mark: 0 - 2
Referencing is absent or does not conform to
Harvard style (as per ASB guide)
Mark: 0 - 2
Report is outside the boundaries of the Word
Limit and/or does not consistently conform to
formatting requirements
Mark: 0 - 2