The document discusses the Gutzwiller variational method for describing strong local correlations in itinerant systems. It notes that itinerancy is best described in k-space using the Bloch representation, while local correlations are best handled in real space using the Wannier representation. The determinant factors in the Gutzwiller expansion must account for both aspects by allowing transformations between these representations. It argues that the determinant factors describe an "exchange hole" effect where configurations with more evenly spaced particles are more probable than crowded configurations, due to antisymmetrization from the Pauli principle.
The document discusses the Gutzwiller variational method for describing strong local correlations in itinerant systems. It notes that itinerancy is best described in k-space using the Bloch representation, while local correlations are best handled in real space using the Wannier representation. The determinant factors in the Gutzwiller expansion must account for both aspects by allowing transformations between these representations. It argues that the determinant factors describe an "exchange hole" effect where configurations with more evenly spaced particles are more probable than crowded configurations, due to antisymmetrization from the Pauli principle.
The document discusses the Gutzwiller variational method for describing strong local correlations in itinerant systems. It notes that itinerancy is best described in k-space using the Bloch representation, while local correlations are best handled in real space using the Wannier representation. The determinant factors in the Gutzwiller expansion must account for both aspects by allowing transformations between these representations. It argues that the determinant factors describe an "exchange hole" effect where configurations with more evenly spaced particles are more probable than crowded configurations, due to antisymmetrization from the Pauli principle.
a distinctive feature: a sharp Fermi surface. The existence of a sharp
Fermi surface is a k-space feature; it is not easily seen in the real-space expansion (9.24). The determinant factors must “know about” the ex- istence of the Fermi surface! They are complicated, inherently complex quantities, expressing the relative phases of the localized configurations. The expansion (9.24) highlights the basic difficulty of describing strong local correlations in itinerant systems. Itinerancy is a k-space feature, easily expressed in the Bloch-representation. Local correlations are, on the other hand, best handled in the Wannier representation. To include both aspects, one has to be able to go to and fro between the two representations; for a many-electron system, this gets complicated. The following argument should help to understand the relevance of the determinant coefficients in (9.24). The same determinants would appear in the Wannier representation of the ground state of a sea IFS),l of N / 2 spinless fermions:
In the absence of orbital degeneracy, the Pauli principle prevents two
electrons from sharing the same site, so there is no on-site interaction to speak about. Still, two fermions tend to keep away from each other: due to the antisymmetrization implicit in (9.26), an exchange hole sur- rounds each fermion (see Problem 9.1). The determinants in the above equation can therefore be regarded as exchange hole factors. They ex- press the fact that a configuration in which the fermions are more-or-less evenly spaced, is much more probable than one in which the fermions are crowded together. Similarly, in (9.24) the same determinant factors describe the exchange hole effect for parallel-spin electrons. If you like, you can say that certain spatial correlations are present even in the non- interacting Fermi sea (FS),but these are due to statistics, and therefore act only between particles with like quantum numbers (i.e., the same spin).