You are on page 1of 8

12/9/2018 Ajit Pai does ISPs’ bidding, pushes for tighter rules on Google and Facebook | Ars Technica

PAI ECHOES BROADBAND LOBBYISTS —

Ajit Pai does ISPs’ bidding, pushes for


tighter rules on Google and Facebook
Pai suggests new rules for Web giants, but not for the ISPs he regulates.
JON BRODKIN - 9/6/2018, 12:43 PM
Getty Images | Chip Somodevilla

Enlarge / FCC Chairman Ajit Pai at The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research on May 5, 2017 in
Washington, DC.

As chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, Ajit Pai has focused on one goal above all
others: eliminating rules previous administrations imposed on broadband providers such as
Comcast, Charter, AT&T, and Verizon.

It turns out Pai is also in lockstep with the broadband industry on another project—convincing
Congress to impose new regulations on Google, Facebook, and Twitter as ISPs try to compete against
tech giants for advertising dollars.

Last week, telco lobby group USTelecom accidentally emailed internal documents containing draft
talking points to Techdirt founder Mike Masnick. As Masnick detailed in a thorough summary and
analysis, USTelecom claims that ISPs "have embraced strong consumer privacy policies" but that
websites pose a grave privacy threat to consumers and should therefore face new regulations.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/09/ajit-pai-does-isps-bidding-pushes-for-tighter-rules-on-google-and-facebook/ 1/8
12/9/2018 Ajit Pai does ISPs’ bidding, pushes for tighter rules on Google and Facebook | Ars Technica

USTelecom also argued that "net neutrality" rules should apply to the practices of websites, not just
to ISPs.

Like clockwork, Pai advanced these broadband lobby talking points Tuesday in a blog post on
Medium titled, "What I Hope to Learn from the Tech Giants." (The post also appeared on Pai's official
FCC blog.)

"I'm sure it's just a coincidence that Pai's talking points in his Medium post match up precisely with
the ones that the telecom lobby mistakenly emailed to a reporter last week," Matt Wood, policy
director of pro-net neutrality advocacy group Free Press, told Ars.

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai's blog.

Pai suggests “new transparency obligations”


In general, broadband lobbyists—and Republican FCC commissioners—argue that Google, Facebook,
and Twitter should face the "same rules" as ISPs. The fact that ISPs have total control over all
consumers' Internet connections and control over their access to all of those websites never gets
mentioned by the broadband industry in its push for regulatory parity. Whether it even makes sense
to use the same rules for companies that control everyone's Internet access and the companies that
send content over the Internet hasn't been addressed by the broadband lobby in any serious way.

Saying that websites pose greater threats to consumers than ISPs is not a new broadband lobby
talking point—it's one they've been using for years to fight privacy and net neutrality rules. But this
talking point is being stressed by industry lobbyists more now as Congress examines problems raised
by tech companies, including in a hearing yesterday.

Congress' examination of tech companies was the impetus for Pai's blog post.

"I hope the upcoming congressional hearings can help us have a more informed debate about the
practices of these tech giants," Pai wrote. Pai said he wants to learn more from tech companies about

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/09/ajit-pai-does-isps-bidding-pushes-for-tighter-rules-on-google-and-facebook/ 2/8
12/9/2018 Ajit Pai does ISPs’ bidding, pushes for tighter rules on Google and Facebook | Ars Technica

transparency, privacy, and online expression, and he thinks Congress should seriously consider
forcing them to follow "new transparency obligations."

Pai says that FCC rules for broadband providers could provide a model for new rules that would apply
to websites.

"Currently, the FCC imposes strict transparency


FURTHER READING
requirements on companies that operate broadband ISP disclosures about data caps and
networks—how they manage their networks, fees eliminated by net neutrality
performance characteristics, and the like," Pai writes. repeal
"Yet consumers have virtually no insight into similar
business practices by tech giants."

Pai seems to be "giving himself a pat on the back for how well he manages ISPs by comparison with
[Web] platforms," Harold Feld, senior VP of consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge, told Ars.

Yet Pai voted against the imposition of the FCC's transparency rules in 2015 when he dissented from
the agency's net neutrality rulemaking. As FCC chairman, he has since eliminated many of those
transparency rules, including ones that required ISPs to prominently disclose hidden fees and the
consequences of exceeding data caps.

To Pai, Google is bigger concern than Comcast


Pai's blog post raised concerns about Twitter's decision-making process when it comes to suspending
or not suspending specific users, Facebook and Twitter blocking certain content, and privacy
problems for consumers caused by Google and Facebook usage.

Pai noted that these companies can "make certain business judgments about content on their sites"
without violating the First Amendment, because they are private entities. He also said the FCC
"shouldn’t regulate these entities like a water company." But in making the case for new transparency
obligations for websites, Pai argued that big Web platforms exert more power than ISPs. Pai wrote:

[I]t's important to have a serious conversation about these issues—not least because these
tech giants have come to have much greater influence over our economy and society. Exactly
twenty years ago, a startup called Google was incorporated. Today, its market capitalization
is greater than that of Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, and Charter combined, along with the GDP of
Sweden. And it as well as Facebook are gaining a powerful duopoly on digital advertising.
Speaking of, fifteen years ago, Facebook was a relatively unknown website for college kids.
Today, one out of every three people on Earth is its "friend." Twitter is where everyone from
politicians to celebrities to corporate executives makes news and where billions more can
read about it and make their own. The public deserves to know more about how these
companies operate. And we need to seriously think about whether the time has come for
these companies to abide by new transparency obligations. After all, just as is the case with
respect to broadband providers, consumers need accurate information in order to make
educated choices about whether and how to use these tech giants' platforms.

"More broadly: Are these tech giants running impartial digital platforms over which they don't
exercise editorial judgment when it comes to content?" Pai also wrote. "Or do they in fact decide what

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/09/ajit-pai-does-isps-bidding-pushes-for-tighter-rules-on-google-and-facebook/ 3/8
12/9/2018 Ajit Pai does ISPs’ bidding, pushes for tighter rules on Google and Facebook | Ars Technica

speech is allowed and what is not and discriminate based on ideology and/or political affiliation? And
again, going back to the first point: where is the transparency?"

Pai noted that he has raised similar concerns before. "Almost one year ago, for instance, I observed
that 'recent experience shows that so-called edge providers are in fact deciding what content [we]
see. These providers routinely block or discriminate against content they don't like.'"

Wood supports more regulation for Google and


FURTHER READING
Facebook, though that would come from Congress Comcast, Charter dominate US;
rather than the FCC. "We do need new laws governing telcos “abandoned rural America,”
edge providers' privacy practices, and we need more report says
transparency into some of the decisions these powerful
edge companies make, too," he said.

But Wood isn't inclined to think that Pai's call for regulation of websites is sincere.

"Pai tossed away not just the power but the responsibility that Congress gave the FCC to keep
broadband networks open and free from discrimination," Wood said. "This chairman twisted himself
in knots to disregard the real authority his agency has over broadband telecom networks, but having
shrugged off that duty he's apparently got the free time to meander over and express concerns about
services clearly outside the FCC's purview."

If Congress did pass new laws governing websites, the FCC likely wouldn't be the agency enforcing
them. The FCC regulates telecommunications networks and broadcast TV or radio stations that have
FCC licenses to use public airwaves but has no specific power over the content of websites.

Of course, there are good reasons for Congress to examine the policies of powerful Internet
companies, including Google, Facebook, and Twitter. But while Pai argues that Google poses greater
threats than Comcast because Google has a larger market cap, the relative stock values of Web
companies and Internet providers aren't relevant to how individual Internet users interact with
websites and their broadband providers.

No matter how big or small Comcast's market cap is, it is still the nation's largest cable and home
broadband provider and is the only choice for 30 million Americans when it comes to broadband
speeds of at least 25Mbps downstream and 3Mbps upstream. The same goes for Charter
Communications, which is the only choice for 38 million Americans when it comes to high-speed
home Internet service. Major home broadband providers have essentially divided up the country by
declining to compete against each other in individual cities and towns, giving them enormous power
over individual consumers.

FCC Republicans stand united


Pai isn't alone among FCC Republicans when it comes to arguing that ISPs deserve a break from the
government because they face competition from Google and Facebook.

In June, FCC Commissioner Michael O'Rielly wrote a blog post saying the government should consider
further deregulation of broadband providers because of the competition they face from websites.

O'Rielly tried to prove his point by noting that the FCC doesn't regulate websites and online services.
"To put this discussion into stark perspective, the following provides a snapshot of several key
communications services (and accompanying leading providers) that the Commission DOES NOT
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/09/ajit-pai-does-isps-bidding-pushes-for-tighter-rules-on-google-and-facebook/ 4/8
12/9/2018 Ajit Pai does ISPs’ bidding, pushes for tighter rules on Google and Facebook | Ars Technica

regulate," O'Rielly wrote. "Maybe you've heard of these companies or used them once or twice
recently?"

His post then shows this screenshot of companies that are supposedly competitors to ISPs yet aren't
regulated by the FCC:
NCTA

The FCC regulates none of these.

That same graphic was later used by cable lobby group NCTA in a filing that asked the Federal Trade
Commission to preempt state and local broadband regulations.

To O'Rielly, the existence of all those Web companies means that federal regulation must be changed
drastically. "Ultimately, the only logical take-away from this information is to either support greater
deregulation of FCC regulatees that must compete with these services or advocate for new
Congressional powers to regulate these services, which would seem futile and unnecessary," he
wrote.

“No regulatory authority to speak of”


Pai couldn't impose any major rules on websites even if he wanted the FCC to do so. "The FCC has no
regulatory authority to speak of over edge providers' practices," Wood told Ars.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/09/ajit-pai-does-isps-bidding-pushes-for-tighter-rules-on-google-and-facebook/ 5/8
12/9/2018 Ajit Pai does ISPs’ bidding, pushes for tighter rules on Google and Facebook | Ars Technica

Ultimately, Feld didn't think there was much of significance in Pai's blog post.

"Other than displaying his unswerving devotion to the Trump literal party line on social media, I'm not
sure there is anything here of note," Feld said.

Disclosure: The Advance/Newhouse Partnership, which owns 13 percent of Charter, is part of Advance
Publications. Advance Publications owns Condé Nast, which owns Ars Technica.

SUBSCRIPTIONS SIGN IN
READER COMMENTS 234 SHARE THIS STORY

JON BRODKIN
Jon is Ars Technica's senior IT reporter, covering the FCC and broadband, telecommunications, wireless
technology, and more.

EMAIL jon.brodkin@arstechnica.com // TWITTER @JBrodkin

The Air Force’s


Senior Citizen
Chopper Can’t
Retire Yet

WATCH
Ars Live #23: The
The Air Force’s Senior History and Future
Citizen Chopper Can’t… of Tech Law

Police re-creation
The Air Force’s Senior Citizen of body camera
Chopper Can’t Retire Yet evidence - Pueblo,
CO | Ars Technica
Some of the Air Force's most important missions
depend on aircraft that were flying, and systems that
were built long before all but the most senior airmen
were even born. + More videos

← PREVIOUS STORY NEXT STORY →

Related Stories

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/09/ajit-pai-does-isps-bidding-pushes-for-tighter-rules-on-google-and-facebook/ 6/8
12/9/2018 Ajit Pai does ISPs’ bidding, pushes for tighter rules on Google and Facebook | Ars Technica

Ajit Pai announces plan Comcast, AT&T, and ISP Flooded with thoughtful RIP net neutrality: FCC
to eliminate Title II net lobbyists are excited net neutrality comments, chair releases plan to
neutrality rules about Trump’s FCC chair FCC highlights “mean deregulate ISPs
tweets”

Sponsored Stories
Powered by

Today on Ars

Boring Company Hands-on with the Apple Watch Series 4 Hello eSIM: Apple moves
approved to build a iPhone XS, iPhone XS hands-on: Sparking envy the iPhone away from
tunnel entrance inside a Max, and iPhone XR in current Apple Watch physical SIMs
residential garage owners

Your new $1,000+ iPhone Google kills Google Inbox Sneak peek at The Good With Florence bearing
won’t come with a Place S3 is everything we down, Tesla remotely
headphone dongle in the love about the series extends some cars’
box batteries

RSS FEEDS CONTACT US NEWSLETTER SIGNUP


VIEW MOBILE SITE STAFF Join the Ars Orbital Transmission
ABOUT US ADVERTISE WITH US mailing list to get weekly updates
delivered to your inbox.
SUBSCRIBE REPRINTS

Email address SUBSCRIBE

CNMN Collection
WIRED Media Group
© 2018 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our
User Agreement (updated 5/25/18) and Privacy Policy and Cookie Statement (updated 5/25/18) and Ars Technica Addendum
(effective 8/21/2018). Ars may earn compensation on sales from links on this site. Read our affiliate link policy.
Your California Privacy Rights
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior
written permission of Condé Nast.
Ad Choices

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/09/ajit-pai-does-isps-bidding-pushes-for-tighter-rules-on-google-and-facebook/ 7/8
12/9/2018 Ajit Pai does ISPs’ bidding, pushes for tighter rules on Google and Facebook | Ars Technica

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/09/ajit-pai-does-isps-bidding-pushes-for-tighter-rules-on-google-and-facebook/ 8/8

You might also like