You are on page 1of 7

E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y

Executive Summary: Standards of Medical


Care in Diabetes—2011

Current criteria for the diagnosis of propriate, treat other cardiovascular abetes in those with prediabetes should
diabetes disease (CVD) risk factors. (B) be performed every year. (E)
● A1C ⱖ6.5%. The test should be per-
formed in a laboratory using a method Detection and diagnosis of Glucose monitoring
that is National Glycohemoglobin Stan- gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) ● Self-monitoring of blood glucose
dardization Program (NGSP)-certified ● Screen for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes (SMBG) should be carried out three or
and standardized to the Diabetes Con- at the first prenatal visit in those with more times daily for patients using mul-
trol and Complications Trial (DCCT) risk factors, using standard diagnostic tiple insulin injections or insulin pump
assay criteria. (B) therapy. (A)
● fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ⱖ126 ● In pregnant women not known to have ● For patients using less-frequent insulin
mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l). Fasting is defined diabetes, screen for GDM at 24 –28 injections, non-insulin therapies, or
as no caloric intake for at least 8 h, or weeks of gestation, using a 75-g 2-h medical nutrition therapy (MNT)
● 2-h plasma glucose ⱖ200 mg/dl (11.1 OGTT and the diagnostic cut points in alone, SMBG may be useful as a guide to
mmol/l) during an oral glucose toler- Table 6 of the “Standards of Medical the success of therapy. (E)
ance test (OGTT). The test should be Care in Diabetes—2011”. (B) ● To achieve postprandial glucose tar-
performed as described by the World ● Screen women with GDM for persistent gets, postprandial SMBG may be appro-
Health Organization, using a glucose diabetes 6 –12 weeks postpartum. (E) priate. (E)
load containing the equivalent of 75 g ● Women with a history of GDM should ● When prescribing SMBG, ensure that
anhydrous glucose dissolved in water have lifelong screening for the develop- patients receive initial instruction in,
● in a patient with classic symptoms of ment of diabetes or prediabetes at least and routine follow-up evaluation of,
hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis, every 3 years. (E) SMBG technique and their ability to use
a random plasma glucose ⱖ200 mg/dl data to adjust therapy. (E)
(11.1 mmol/l) Prevention/delay of type 2 diabetes ● Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
● in the absence of unequivocal hypergly- ● Patients with impaired glucose toler- in conjunction with intensive insulin
cemia, result should be confirmed by ance (IGT) (A), impaired fasting glu- regimens can be a useful tool to lower
repeat testing. cose (IFG) (E), or an A1C of 5.7– 6.4% A1C in selected adults (age ⱖ25 years)
(E) should be referred to an effective with type 1 diabetes. (A)
Testing for diabetes in asymptomatic ongoing support program targeting ● Although the evidence for A1C-
patients weight loss of 7% of body weight and lowering is less strong in children,
● Testing to detect type 2 diabetes and increasing physical activity to at least teens, and younger adults, CGM may
assess risk for future diabetes in asymp- 150 min/week of moderate activity be helpful in these groups. Success cor-
tomatic people should be considered in such as walking. relates with adherence to ongoing use
adults of any age who are overweight or ● Follow-up counseling appears to be im- of the device. (C)
obese (BMI ⱖ25 kg/m2) and who have portant for success. (B) ● CGM may be a supplemental tool to
one or more additional risk factors for ● Based on potential cost-savings of dia- SMBG in those with hypoglycemia un-
diabetes (see Table 4 of the “Standards betes prevention, such programs awareness and/or frequent hypoglyce-
of Medical Care in Diabetes—2011”). should be covered by third-party pay- mic episodes. (E)
In those without these risk factors, test- ors. (E)
ing should begin at age 45 years. (B) ● Metformin therapy for prevention of A1C
● If tests are normal, repeat testing car- type 2 diabetes may be considered in ● Perform the A1C test at least two times
ried out at least at 3-year intervals is those at highest risk for developing di- a year in patients who are meeting treat-
reasonable. (E) abetes, such as those with multiple risk ment goals (and who have stable glyce-
● To test for diabetes or to assess risk of factors, especially if they demonstrate mic control). (E)
future diabetes, A1C, FPG, or 2-h 75-g progression of hyperglycemia (e.g. A1C ● Perform the A1C test quarterly in pa-
OGTT are appropriate. (B) ⱖ6%) despite lifestyle interventions. tients whose therapy has changed or
● In those identified with increased risk (B) who are not meeting glycemic goals. (E)
for future diabetes, identify and, if ap- ● Monitoring for the development of di- ● Use of point-of-care testing for A1C al-
lows for timely decisions on therapy
changes, when needed. (E)
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Glycemic goals in adults
DOI: 10.2337/dc11-S004
●Lowering A1C to below or around 7%
© 2011 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly
cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons. has been shown to reduce microvascu-
org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details. lar and neuropathic complications of

S4 DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 34, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2011 care.diabetesjournals.org


Executive Summary

diabetes and, if implemented soon after should be adequately covered by insur- may provide a modest additional bene-
the diagnosis of diabetes, is associated ance and other payors. (E) fit for glycemic control over that ob-
with long-term reduction in macrovas- served when total carbohydrate is
cular disease. Therefore, a reasonable Energy balance, overweight, and considered alone. (B)
A1C goal for many nonpregnant adults obesity ● Saturated fat intake should be ⬍7% of
is ⬍7%. (B) ● In overweight and obese insulin- total calories. (A)
● Because additional analyses from sev- resistant individuals, modest weight ● Reducing intake of trans fat lowers LDL
eral randomized trials suggest a small loss has been shown to reduce insulin cholesterol and increases HDL choles-
but incremental benefit in microvascu- resistance. Thus, weight loss is recom- terol (A); therefore, intake of trans fat
lar outcomes with A1C values closer to mended for all overweight or obese in- should be minimized. (E)
normal, providers might reasonably dividuals who have or are at risk for
suggest more stringent A1C goals for diabetes. (A) Other nutrition recommendations
selected individual patients, if this can ● For weight loss, either low-carbohy- ● If adults with diabetes choose to use
be achieved without significant hypo- drate, low-fat calorie-restricted, or alcohol, daily intake should be limited
glycemia or other adverse effects of Mediterranean diets may be effective in to a moderate amount (one drink per
treatment. Such patients might include the short term (up to 2 years). (A) day or less for adult women and two
those with short duration of diabetes, ● For patients on low-carbohydrate diets, drinks per day or less for adult men).
long life expectancy, and no significant monitor lipid profiles, renal function, (E)
cardiovascular disease. (B) and protein intake (in those with ne- ● Routine supplementation with antioxi-
● Conversely, less stringent A1C goals phropathy) and adjust hypoglycemic dants, such as vitamins E and C and
may be appropriate for patients with a therapy as needed. (E) carotene, is not advised because of lack
history of severe hypoglycemia, limited ● Physical activity and behavior modifi- of evidence of efficacy and concern re-
life expectancy, advanced microvascu- cation are important components of lated to long-term safety. (A)
lar or macrovascular complications, ex- weight loss programs and are most ● Individualized meal planning should
tensive comorbid conditions, and those helpful in maintenance of weight loss. include optimization of food choices to
with longstanding diabetes in whom (B) meet recommended daily allowance
the general goal is difficult to attain de- (RDA)/dietary reference intake (DRI)
spite diabetes self-management educa- Recommendations for primary for all micronutrients. (E)
tion, appropriate glucose monitoring, prevention of diabetes
and effective doses of multiple glucose- ● Among individuals at high risk for de- Physical activity
lowering agents including insulin. (C) veloping type 2 diabetes, structured ● People with diabetes should be advised
programs that emphasize lifestyle to perform at least 150 min/week of
changes that include moderate weight moderate-intensity aerobic physical ac-
Diabetes self-management education
loss (7% of body weight) and regular tivity (50 –70% of maximum heart
(DSME)
● People with diabetes should receive
physical activity (150 min/week), with rate). (A)
dietary strategies including reduced ● In the absence of contraindications,
DSME according to national standards
calories and reduced intake of dietary people with type 2 diabetes should be
when their diabetes is diagnosed and as
fat, can reduce the risk for developing encouraged to perform resistance train-
needed thereafter. (B)
● Effective self-management and quality
diabetes and are therefore recom- ing three times per week. (A)
mended. (A)
of life are the key outcomes of DSME ● Individuals at high risk for type 2 dia- Psychosocial assessment and care
and should be measured and moni- ● Assessment of psychological and social
betes should be encouraged to achieve
tored as part of care. (C)
● DSME should address psychosocial is-
the U.S. Department of Agriculture situation should be included as an on-
(USDA) recommendation for dietary fi- going part of the medical management
sues, since emotional well-being is as-
ber (14 g fiber/1,000 kcal) and foods of diabetes. (E)
sociated with positive diabetes ● Psychosocial screening and follow-up
containing whole grains (one-half of
outcomes. (C)
● Because DSME can result in cost-
grain intake). (B) should include, but is not limited to,
attitudes about the illness, expectations
savings and improved outcomes (B),
Recommendations for management for medical management and out-
DSME should be adequately reim-
of diabetes: macronutrients in comes, affect/mood, general and diabe-
bursed by third-party payors. (E)
diabetes management tes-related quality of life, resources
● The best mix of carbohydrate, protein, (financial, social, and emotional), and
Medical nutrition therapy (MNT) and fat may be adjusted to meet the psychiatric history. (E)
General recommendations metabolic goals and individual prefer- ● Screen for psychosocial problems such
● Individuals who have prediabetes or di- ences of the person with diabetes. (E) as depression and diabetes-related dis-
abetes should receive individualized ● Monitoring carbohydrate, whether by tress, anxiety, eating disorders, and
MNT as needed to achieve treatment carbohydrate counting, choices, or ex- cognitive impairment when self-
goals, preferably provided by a regis- perience-based estimation, remains a management is poor. (C)
tered dietitian familiar with the compo- key strategy in achieving glycemic con-
nents of diabetes MNT. (A) trol. (A) Hypoglycemia
● Because MNT can result in cost-savings ● For individuals with diabetes, the use of ●Glucose (15–20 g) is the preferred
and improved outcomes (B), MNT the glycemic index and glycemic load treatment for the conscious individual

care.diabetesjournals.org DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 34, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2011 S5


Executive Summary

with hypoglycemia, although any form vaccine was administered ⬎5 years mated glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
of carbohydrate that contains glucose ago. Other indications for repeat vacci- ⱖ30 ml/min/1.73 m2 and a loop di-
may be used. If SMBG 15 min after nation include nephrotic syndrome, uretic for those with an estimated GFR
treatment shows continued hypoglyce- chronic renal disease, and other immu- ⬍30 ml/min/1.73 m2. (C)
mia, the treatment should be repeated. nocompromised states, such as after ● Multiple drug therapy (two or more
Once SMBG glucose returns to normal, transplantation. (C) agents at maximal doses) is generally
the individual should consume a meal required to achieve blood pressure tar-
or snack to prevent recurrence of hypo- Hypertension/blood pressure control gets. (B)
glycemia. (E) Screening and diagnosis ● If ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or diuretics are
● Glucagon should be prescribed for all ● Blood pressure should be measured at used, kidney function and serum potas-
individuals at significant risk of severe every routine diabetes visit. Patients sium levels should be monitored. (E)
hypoglycemia, and caregivers or family found to have systolic blood pressure ● In pregnant patients with diabetes and
members of these individuals should be ⱖ130 mmHg or diastolic blood pres- chronic hypertension, blood pressure
instructed in its administration. Gluca- sure ⱖ80 mmHg should have blood target goals of 110 –129/65–79 mmHg
gon administration is not limited to pressure confirmed on a separate day. are suggested in the interest of long-
health care professionals. (E) Repeat systolic blood pressure ⱖ130 term maternal health and minimizing
● Individuals with hypoglycemia un- mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ⱖ80 impaired fetal growth. ACE inhibitors
awareness or one or more episodes of mmHg confirms a diagnosis of hyper- and ARBs are contraindicated during
severe hypoglycemia should be advised tension. (C) pregnancy. (E)
to raise their glycemic targets to strictly
avoid further hypoglycemia for at least Goals Dyslipidemia/lipid management
several weeks, to partially reverse hypo- ● A goal systolic blood pressure ⬍130 Screening
glycemia unawareness and reduce the mmHg is appropriate for most patients ● In most adult patients, measure fasting
risk of future episodes. (B) with diabetes. (C) lipid profile at least annually. In adults
● Based on patient characteristics and re- with low-risk lipid values (LDL choles-
Bariatric surgery sponse to therapy, higher or lower sys- terol ⬍100 mg/dl, HDL cholesterol
● Bariatric surgery may be considered for tolic blood pressure targets may be ⬎50 mg/dl, and triglycerides ⬍150
adults with BMI ⬎35 kg/m2 and type 2 appropriate. (B) mg/dl), lipid assessments may be re-
diabetes, especially if the diabetes or as- ● Patients with diabetes should be treated peated every 2 years. (E)
sociated comorbidities are difficult to to a diastolic blood pressure ⬍80
control with lifestyle and pharmaco- mmHg. (B) Treatment recommendations and goals
logic therapy. (B) ● Lifestyle modification focusing on the
● Patients with type 2 diabetes who have Treatment reduction of saturated fat, trans fat,
undergone bariatric surgery need life- ● Patients with a systolic blood pressure and cholesterol intake; the increase of
long lifestyle support and medical of 130 –139 mmHg or a diastolic blood omega-3 fatty acids, viscous fiber,
monitoring. (E) pressure of 80 – 89 mmHg may be given and plant stanols/sterols; weight loss
● Although small trials have shown gly- lifestyle therapy alone for a maximum (if indicated); and increased physical
cemic benefit of bariatric surgery in pa- of 3 months and then, if targets are not activity should be recommended to
tients with type 2 diabetes and BMI of achieved, be treated with the addition improve the lipid profile in patients
30 –35 kg/m2, there is currently insuf- of pharmacological agents. (E) with diabetes. (A)
ficient evidence to generally recom- ● Patients with more severe hypertension ● Statin therapy should be added to life-
mend surgery in patients with BMI ⬍35 (systolic blood pressure ⱖ140 or dia- style therapy, regardless of baseline
kg/m2 outside of a research protocol. stolic blood pressure ⱖ90 mmHg) at lipid levels, for diabetic patients:
(E) diagnosis or follow-up should receive ● with overt CVD (A)
● T h e l o n g - t e r m b e n e fi t s , c o s t - pharmacologic therapy in addition to ● without CVD who are over the age of
effectiveness, and risks of bariatric sur- lifestyle therapy. (A) 40 years and have one or more other
gery in individuals with type 2 diabetes ● Lifestyle therapy for hypertension con- CVD risk factors (A)
should be studied in well-designed sists of: weight loss, if overweight; ● For patients at lower risk than above
controlled trials with optimal medical DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hy- (e.g. without overt CVD and under the
and lifestyle therapy as the comparator. pertension)-style dietary pattern, in- age of 40 years), statin therapy should
(E) cluding reducing sodium and be considered in addition to lifestyle
increasing potassium intake; modera- therapy if LDL cholesterol remains
Immunization tion of alcohol intake; and increased ⬎100 mg/dl or in those with multiple
● Annually provide an influenza vaccine physical activity. (B) CVD risk factors. (E)
to all diabetic patients ⱖ6 months of ● Pharmacologic therapy for patients ● In individuals without overt CVD, the
age. (C) with diabetes and hypertension should primary goal is an LDL cholesterol
● Administer pneumococcal polysaccha- be with a regimen that includes either ⬍100 mg/dl (2.6 mmol/l). (A)
ride vaccine to all diabetic patients ⱖ2 an ACE inhibitor or an ARB. If one class ● In individuals with overt CVD, a lower
years of age. A one-time revaccination is is not tolerated, the other should be LDL cholesterol goal of ⬍70 mg/dl (1.8
recommended for individuals ⬎64 substituted. If needed to achieve blood mmol/l), using a high dose of a statin, is
years of age previously immunized pressure targets, a thiazide diuretic an option. (B)
when they were ⬍65 years of age if the should be added to those with an esti- ● If drug-treated patients do not reach the

S6 DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 34, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2011 care.diabetesjournals.org


Executive Summary

above targets on maximal tolerated sta- Coronary heart disease (CHD) and ARBs, there is clinical trial support
tin therapy, a reduction in LDL choles- screening and treatment for each of the following statements:
terol of ⬃30 – 40% from baseline is an Screening ● In patients with type 1 diabetes, with
alternative therapeutic goal. (A) ● In asymptomatic patients, routine hypertension and any degree of albu-
● Triglyceride levels ⬍150 mg/dl (1.7 screening for CAD is not recom- minuria, ACE inhibitors have been
mmol/l) and HDL cholesterol ⬎40 mended, as it does not improve out- shown to delay the progression of ne-
mg/dl (1.0 mmol/l) in men and ⬎50 comes as long as CVD risk factors are phropathy. (A)
mg/dl (1.3 mmol/l) in women are desir- treated. (A) ● In patients with type 2 diabetes, hy-
able. However, LDL cholesterol– pertension, and microalbuminuria,
targeted statin therapy remains the Treatment both ACE inhibitors and ARBs have
preferred strategy. (C) ● In patients with known CVD, ACE in- been shown to delay the progression
● If targets are not reached on maximally hibitor (C) and aspirin and statin ther- to macroalbuminuria. (A)
tolerated doses of statins, combination apy (A) (if not contraindicated) should ● In patients with type 2 diabetes, hy-
therapy using statins and other lipid- be used to reduce the risk of cardiovas- pertension, macroalbuminuria, and
lowering agents may be considered to cular events. renal insufficiency (serum creatinine
achieve lipid targets but has not been ● In patients with a prior myocardial in- ⬎1.5 mg/dl), ARBs have been shown
evaluated in outcome studies for either farction, ␤-blockers should be contin- to delay the progression of nephrop-
CVD outcomes or safety. (E) ued for at least 2 years after the event. athy. (A)
● Statin therapy is contraindicated in (B) ● If one class is not tolerated, the other
pregnancy. (E) ● Longer-term use of ␤-blockers in the should be substituted. (E)
absence of hypertension is reasonable if ● Reduction of protein intake to 0.8 –1.0
Antiplatelet agents well tolerated, but data are lacking. (E) g 䡠 kg body wt–1 䡠 day–1 in individuals
● Consider aspirin therapy (75–162 mg/ ● Avoid thiazolidinedione (TZD) treat- with diabetes and the earlier stages of
day) as a primary prevention strategy in ment in patients with symptomatic CKD and to 0.8 g 䡠 kg body wt–1 䡠 day–1
those with type 1 or type 2 diabetes at heart failure. (C) in the later stages of CKD may improve
increased cardiovascular risk (10-year ● Metformin may be used in patients with measures of renal function (urine albu-
risk ⬎10%). This includes most men stable congestive heart failure (CHF) if min excretion rate, GFR) and is recom-
⬎50 years of age or women ⬎60 years renal function is normal. It should be mended. (B)
of age who have at least one additional avoided in unstable or hospitalized pa- ● When ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or diuret-
major risk factor (family history of tients with CHF. (C) ics are used, monitor serum creatinine
CVD, hypertension, smoking, dyslipi- and potassium levels for the develop-
demia, or albuminuria). (C) Nephropathy screening and ment of acute kidney disease and hy-
● Aspirin should not be recommended treatment perkalemia. (E)
for CVD prevention for adults with di- General recommendations ● Continued monitoring of urine albu-
abetes at low CVD risk (10-year CVD ● To reduce the risk or slow the progres- min excretion to assess both response
risk ⬍5%, such as in men ⬍50 years of sion of nephropathy, optimize glucose to therapy and progression of disease is
age and women ⬍60 years of age with control. (A) recommended. (E)
no major additional CVD risk factors), ● To reduce the risk or slow the progres- ● When estimated GFR (eGFR) is ⬍60
since the potential adverse effects from sion of nephropathy, optimize blood ml.min/1.73 m2, evaluate and manage
bleeding likely offset the potential ben- pressure control. (A) potential complications of CKD. (E)
efits. (C) ● Consider referral to a physician experi-
● In patients in these age-groups with Screening enced in the care of kidney disease
multiple other risk factors (e.g. 10-year ● Perform an annual test to assess urine when there is uncertainty about the eti-
risk 5–10%), clinical judgment is re- albumin excretion in type 1 diabetic pa- ology of kidney disease (heavy protein-
quired. (E) tients with diabetes duration of ⱖ5 uria, active urine sediment, absence of
● Use aspirin therapy (75–162 mg/day) years and in all type 2 diabetic patients retinopathy, rapid decline in GFR), dif-
as a secondary prevention strategy in starting at diagnosis. (E) ficult management issues, or advanced
those with diabetes with a history of ● Measure serum creatinine at least annu- kidney disease. (B)
CVD. (A) ally in all adults with diabetes regard-
● For patients with CVD and docu- less of the degree of urine albumin Retinopathy screening and treatment
mented aspirin allergy, clopidogrel (75 excretion. The serum creatinine should General recommendations
mg/day) should be used. (B) be used to estimate GFR and stage the ● To reduce the risk or slow the progres-
● Combination therapy with ASA (75– level of chronic kidney disease (CKD), sion of retinopathy, optimize glycemic
162 mg/day) and clopidogrel (75 mg/ if present. (E) control. (A)
day) is reasonable for up to a year after ● To reduce the risk or slow the progres-
an acute coronary syndrome. (B) Treatment sion of retinopathy, optimize blood
● In the treatment of the nonpregnant pa- pressure control. (A)
Smoking cessation tient with micro- or macroalbuminuria,
● Advise all patients not to smoke. (A) either ACE inhibitors or ARBs should Screening
● Include smoking cessation counseling be used. (A) ● Adults and children aged 10 years or
and other forms of treatment as a rou- ● While there are no adequate head-to- older with type 1 diabetes should have
tine component of diabetes care. (B) head comparisons of ACE inhibitors an initial dilated and comprehensive

care.diabetesjournals.org DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 34, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2011 S7


Executive Summary

eye examination by an ophthalmologist Neuropathy screening and treatment Screening and management of
or optometrist within 5 years after the ● All patients should be screened for dis- chronic complications in children
onset of diabetes. (B) tal symmetric polyneuropathy (DPN) at and adolescents with type 1 diabetes
● Patients with type 2 diabetes should diagnosis and at least annually thereaf-
have an initial dilated and comprehen- ter, using simple clinical tests. (B) Nephropathy
● Electrophysiological testing is rarely ● Annual screening for microalbumin-
sive eye examination by an ophthalmol-
ogist or optometrist shortly after the needed, except in situations where the uria, with a random spot urine sample
diagnosis of diabetes. (B) clinical features are atypical. (E) for albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR),
● Subsequent examinations for type 1 ● Screening for signs and symptoms of should be considered once the child is
cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy 10 years of age and has had diabetes for
and type 2 diabetic patients should be
should be instituted at diagnosis of type 5 years. (E)
repeated annually by an ophthalmolo- ● Confirmed, persistently elevated ACR
2 diabetes and 5 years after the diagno-
gist or optometrist. Less-frequent ex- on two additional urine specimens
sis of type 1 diabetes. Special testing is
ams (every 2–3 years) may be from different days should be treated
rarely needed and may not affect man-
considered following one or more nor- agement or outcomes. (E) with an ACE inhibitor, titrated to nor-
mal eye exams. Examinations will be ● Medications for the relief of specific malization of albumin excretion if pos-
required more frequently if retinopathy symptoms related to DPN and auto- sible. (E)
is progressing. (B) nomic neuropathy are recommended,
● High-quality fundus photographs can Hypertension
as they improve the quality of life of the
detect most clinically significant dia- patient. (E) ● Treatment of high-normal blood pres-
betic retinopathy. Interpretation of the sure (systolic or diastolic blood pres-
images should be performed by a Foot care sure consistently above the 90th
trained eye care provider. While retinal ● For all patients with diabetes, perform percentile for age, sex, and height)
photography may serve as a screening an annual comprehensive foot exami- should include dietary intervention
tool for retinopathy, it is not a substi- nation to identify risk factors predictive and exercise, aimed at weight control
tute for a comprehensive eye exam, of ulcers and amputations. The foot ex- and increased physical activity, if ap-
which should be performed at least ini- amination should include inspection, propriate. If target blood pressure is not
tially and at intervals thereafter as rec- assessment of foot pulses, and testing reached with 3– 6 months of lifestyle
ommended by an eye care professional. for loss of protective sensation (10-g intervention, pharmacologic treatment
(E) monofilament plus testing any one of: should be considered. (E)
vibration using 128-Hz tuning fork, ● Pharmacologic treatment of hyperten-
● Women with pre-existing diabetes who
are planning a pregnancy or who have pinprick sensation, ankle reflexes, or sion (systolic or diastolic blood pres-
become pregnant should have a com- vibration perception threshold). (B) sure consistently above the 95th
● Provide general foot self-care education percentile for age, sex, and height or
prehensive eye examination and be
to all patients with diabetes. (B) consistently ⬎130/80 mmHg, if 95%
counseled on the risk of development
● A multidisciplinary approach is recom- exceeds that value) should be initiated
and/or progression of diabetic retinop- as soon as the diagnosis is confirmed.
mended for individuals with foot ulcers
athy. Eye examination should occur in (E)
and high-risk feet, especially those with a
the first trimester with close follow-up ● ACE inhibitors should be considered
history of prior ulcer or amputation. (B)
throughout pregnancy and for 1 year ● Refer patients who smoke, have loss of for the initial treatment of hyperten-
postpartum. (B) protective sensation and structural ab- sion, following appropriate reproduc-
normalities, or have history of prior tive counseling due to its potential
Treatment lower-extremity complications to foot teratogenic effects. (E)
● care specialists for ongoing preventive ● The goal of treatment is a blood pres-
Promptly refer patients with any level of
macular edema, severe nonproliferative care and life-long surveillance. (C) sure consistently ⬍130/80 or below the
diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), or any ● Initial screening for peripheral arterial 90th percentile for age, sex, and height,
proliferative diabetic retinopathy disease (PAD) should include a history whichever is lower. (E)
(PDR) to an ophthalmologist who is for claudication and an assessment of
the pedal pulses. Consider obtaining an Dyslipidemia
knowledgeable and experienced in the
ankle-brachial index (ABI), as many pa- Screening
management and treatment of diabetic ● If there is a family history of hypercho-
tients with PAD are asymptomatic. (C)
retinopathy. (A) ● Refer patients with significant claudica- lesterolemia (total cholesterol ⬎240
● Laser photocoagulation therapy is indi-
tion or a positive ABI for further vascu- mg/dl) or a cardiovascular event before
cated to reduce the risk of vision loss in lar assessment and consider exercise, age 55 years, or if family history is un-
patients with high-risk PDR, clinically medications, and surgical options. (C) known, then a fasting lipid profile
significant macular edema, and some should be performed on children ⬎2
cases of severe NPDR. (A) Children and adolescents years of age soon after diagnosis (after
● The presence of retinopathy is not a glucose control has been established).
contraindication to aspirin therapy for Glycemic control If family history is not of concern, then
cardioprotection, as this therapy does ● Consider age when setting glycemic the first lipid screening should be con-
not increase the risk of retinal hemor- goals in children and adolescents with sidered at puberty (ⱖ10 years). All chil-
rhage. (A) type 1 diabetes. (E) dren diagnosed with diabetes at or after

S8 DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 34, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2011 care.diabetesjournals.org


Executive Summary

puberty should have a fasting lipid pro- dietitian experienced in managing both efit and the individual patient. Treat-
file performed soon after diagnosis (af- diabetes and celiac disease. (E) ment of hypertension is indicated in
ter glucose control has been virtually all older adults, and lipid and
established). (E) Hypothyroidism aspirin therapy may benefit those with
● For both age-groups, if lipids are abnor- ● Children with type 1 diabetes should be life expectancy at least equal to the time
mal, annual monitoring is recom- screened for thyroid peroxidase and frame of primary or secondary preven-
mended. If LDL cholesterol values are thyroglobulin antibodies at diagnosis. tion trials. (E)
within the accepted risk levels (⬍100 (E) ● Screening for diabetes complications
mg/dl [2.6 mmol/l]), a lipid profile ● TSH concentrations should be mea- should be individualized in older
should be repeated every 5 years. (E) sured after metabolic control has been adults, but particular attention should
established. If normal, they should be be paid to complications that would
Treatment rechecked every 1–2 years, or if the pa- lead to functional impairment. (E)
● Initial therapy should consist of optimi- tient develops symptoms of thyroid
zation of glucose control and MNT us- dysfunction, thyromegaly, or an abnor- Diabetes care in the hospital
ing a Step 2 American Heart mal growth rate. (E) ● All patients with diabetes admitted to
Association diet aimed at a decrease in the hospital should have their diabetes
the amount of saturated fat in the diet. Preconception care clearly identified in the medical record.
(E) ● A1C levels should be as close to normal (E)
● After the age of 10 years, the addition of as possible (⬍7%) in an individual pa- ● All patients with diabetes should have
a statin in patients who, after MNT and tient before conception is attempted. an order for blood glucose monitoring,
lifestyle changes, have LDL cholesterol (B) with results available to all members of
⬎160 mg/dl (4.1 mmol/l), or LDL cho- ● Starting at puberty, preconception the health care team. (E)
lesterol ⬎130 mg/dl (3.4 mmol/l) and counseling should be incorporated in ● Goals for blood glucose levels:
one or more CVD risk factors, is reason- the routine diabetes clinic visit for all ● Critically ill patients: Insulin therapy
able. (E) women of child-bearing potential. (C) should be initiated for treatment of
● The goal of therapy is an LDL choles- ● Women with diabetes who are contem- persistent hyperglycemia starting at a
terol value ⬍100 mg/dl (2.6 mmol/l). plating pregnancy should be evaluated threshold of no greater than 180
(E) and, if indicated, treated for diabetic mg/dl (10 mmol/l). Once insulin
retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, therapy is started, a glucose range of
Retinopathy and CVD. (E) 140 –180 mg/dl (7.8 to 10 mmol/l) is
● The first ophthalmologic examination ● Medications used by such women recommended for the majority of
should be obtained once the child is should be evaluated prior to concep- critically ill patients. (A)
ⱖ10 years of age and has had diabetes tion, since drugs commonly used to ● More stringent goals, such as 110 –
for 3–5 years. (E) treat diabetes and its complications 140 mg/dl (6.1–7.8 mmol/l) may be
● After the initial examination, annual may be contraindicated or not recom- appropriate for selected patients, as
routine follow-up is generally recom- mended in pregnancy, including st- long as this can be achieved without
mended. Less frequent examinations atins, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and most significant hypoglycemia. (C)
may be acceptable on the advice of an non-insulin therapies. (E) ● Critically ill patients require an intra-
eye care professional. (E) ● Since many pregnancies are un- venous insulin protocol that has
planned, consider the potential risks demonstrated efficacy and safety in
Celiac disease and benefits of medications that are achieving the desired glucose range
● Children with type 1 diabetes should be contraindicated in pregnancy in all without increasing risk for severe hy-
screened for celiac disease by measur- women of child-bearing potential, and poglycemia. (E)
ing tissue transglutaminase or anti- counsel women using such medica- ● Non– critically ill patients: There is
endomysial antibodies, with tions accordingly. (E) no clear evidence for specific blood
documentation of normal total serum glucose goals. If treated with insulin,
IgA levels, soon after the diagnosis of Older adults the pre-meal blood glucose target
diabetes. (E) ● Older adults who are functional, cogni- should generally be ⬍140 mg/dl (7.8
● Testing should be repeated in children tively intact, and have significant life mmol/l) with random blood glucose
with growth failure, failure to gain expectancy should receive diabetes care ⬍180 mg/dl (10.0 mmol/l), provided
weight, weight loss, diarrhea, flatu- using goals developed for younger these targets can be safely achieved.
lence, abdominal pain, or signs of mal- adults. (E) More stringent targets may be appro-
absorption or in children with frequent ● Glycemic goals for older adults not priate in stable patients with previous
unexplained hypoglycemia or deterio- meeting the above criteria may be re- tight glycemic control. Less stringent
ration in glycemic control. (E) laxed using individual criteria, but hy- targets may be appropriate in those
● Children with positive antibodies perglycemia leading to symptoms or with severe comorbidites. (E)
should be referred to a gastroenterolo- risk of acute hyperglycemic complica- ● Scheduled subcutaneous insulin with
gist for evaluation with endoscopy and tions should be avoided in all patients. basal, nutritional, and correction com-
biopsy. (E) (E) ponents is the preferred method for
● Children with biopsy-confirmed celiac ● Other cardiovascular risk factors achieving and maintaining glucose
disease should be placed on a gluten- should be treated in older adults with control in non– critically ill patients.
free diet and have consultation with a consideration of the time frame of ben- (C) Using correction dose or “supple-

care.diabetesjournals.org DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 34, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2011 S9


Executive Summary

mental” insulin to correct pre-meal hy- pressive medications. (B) If hypergly- should be documented in the medial
perglycemia in addition to scheduled cemia is documented and persistent, record and tracked. (E)
prandial and basal insulin is recom- treatment is necessary. Such patients ● All patients with diabetes admitted to
mended. (E) should be treated to the same glyce- the hospital should have an A1C ob-
● Glucose monitoring should be initi- mic goals as patients with known di- tained if the result of testing in the
ated in any patient not known to be abetes. (E) previous 2–3 months is not available.
diabetic who receives therapy associ- ● A hypoglycemia management protocol (E)
ated with high risk for hyperglycemia, should be adopted and implemented ● Patients with hyperglycemia in the hos-
including high-dose glucocorticoid by each hospital or hospital system. A pital who do not have a diagnosis of
therapy, initiation of enteral or paren- plan for treating hypoglycemia should diabetes should have appropriate plans
teral nutrition, or other medications be established for each patient. Epi- for follow-up testing and care docu-
such as octreotide or immunosup- sodes of hypoglycemia in the hospital mented at discharge. (E)

S10 DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 34, SUPPLEMENT 1, JANUARY 2011 care.diabetesjournals.org

You might also like