Professional Documents
Culture Documents
We shall leave the problem of indirect questions aside, for a subsequent section. This
section will only deal with the opposition between direct and indirect questions, focusing on
direct questions mainly.
If we try to analyze the examples above, it appears that direct questions are
characterized by:
It can be said that the interrogative force of direct questions is provided by two of the
characteristics we mentioned: the fact that the subject changes places with the auxiliary, by
means of Subject Auxiliary Inversion, and the specific rising intonation a speaker attaches to
the sentence he utters.
Unlike direct questions, indirect ones do not make use of Subject Auxiliary Inversion,
and their intonation is not rising (and this is obvious even graphically, since we do not use a
question mark with indirect questions). In the case of indirect questions, the interrogative
force we were speaking about has been taken over by the main verb that introduces the
indirect question. Compare:
The fact that the meaning of indirect questions is tightly linked to the main verb that
introduces them is reinforced in English by the necessity that the tense within the indirect
question should correspond to the tense in the main clause (that is, the rules of the sequence of
the tenses need to be observed: in example (5), the Past Tense in the main clause matches the
Past Continuous in the subordinate). It would be therefore incorrect to say something like:
Since the question is not direct any more, Subject Auxiliary Inversion is not required, and
1
the sentence would be deemed grammatically wrong.
Another criterion of classification is, as Quirk shows, the type of answer the
respective question requires. In this case, one can speak of three classes of questions: those
questions that need a yes/no answer, those that need an elaborate answer and those that need
an alternative answer. Let us provide examples and a short presentation of each of the
aforementioned types of direct questions.
Since questions qualify as non-assertive contexts, one would expect them to make use
of Negative Polarity Items:
(14) Did anyone call last night?
(M-a căutat cineva aseară?)
(15) Has the boat left yet?
(A plecat deja vasul?)
Those yes / no questions that prefer to use Affirmative Polarity Items, instead of
Negative Polarity ones, are said to be positively – oriented, that is the answers to these
questions are supposed to be positive:
2
A sub-type of yes/ no questions is represented by the so-called declarative questions,
which are so named because they are not characterized by Subject Auxiliary Inversion. The
declarative question is a type of question which is identical in form to a statement, except for
the final rising question intonation:
2.2.2 Wh – questions
Wh- questions are formed with the aid of one of the following simple interrogative
words:
who/ whom/ whose, what, which,
when, where, how, why
The wh-phrase appears in sentence-initial position and Subject Auxiliary Inversion
takes place:
Note that there is a group of informal intensificatory wh – words (who ever, what
ever, why ever, etc) that convey to the question an emphatic meaning:
There are certain cases where there are two wh – phrases present in the question:
3
2.2.3. Alternative questions
Alternative questions are those questions that receive an alternative answer:
Any positive yes/no question can be converted into an alternative one by adding the phrase or
not, or a matching negative clause:
an imperative
but the most frequent kind of tag questions are the ones attached to:
declarative sentences
We shall deal with the latter type in more detail. Depending on whether they match
the polarity of the main sentence or not, tag questions can be:
4
( Şi Sue nu şi-a dat încă licenţa)
Harry: She hasn’t graduated yet, hasn’t she?
(Aha, deci nu şi-a dat licenţa, hm?)
with a rising intonation, the speaker is not sure about what he says and he
expects an answer:
(38) They’re moving, aren’t they?
(Se mută, nu?)
with a falling intonation, the speaker is sure about what he says and doesn’t
really expect an answer:
2.3.2.1. Recapitulatory echo questions - questions which repeat part or all of the message, as
a way of having its content confirmed
In their turn, recapitulatory echo questions can be further split into:
a) general echo questions – characterized by the fact that they have the same order as
declarative questions (see 2.2.1.) but a rising intonation (instead of a falling one, as
is the case with declarative questions):
b) special echo questions – the wh- word can be placed in sentence initial position or
not. If the wh- phrase is fronted, Subject Auxiliary Inversion takes place,
accompanied by rising intonation:
5
B: You saw WHOM yesterday?
(Pe cine ai văzut ieri?!)
(43) A: Switch that light off.
(Închide lumina aia.)
B: Switch WHAT off?
(Ce să închid?!)
(44) A: We went to Amsterdam.
(Ne-am dus la Amsterdam.)
B: WHERE did you go?
(Unde ai fost?!)
(45) A: He is an astronaut.
(E astronaut)
B: WHAT is he?
(Ce e?!)
2.3.2.2. Explicatory Echo Questions – ask for the clarification, rather than the repetition, of
something just said. The difference between recapitulatory and explicatory echo questions lies
in the type of intonation they possess: as we have seen, with recapitulatory echo questions,
intonation is rising, whereas with explicatory echo questions, intonation is falling: