EGET Terminology+ and Periodization (toon taka jc reamed, not gen x oa he ea ow uh ej ar cast npr gee a cen whey ae Comin beome ea @ Definit sanding eof tay. trowetge ae oon oy English and American Literary History: une ere | on and Use of Literary Hisiory The preceding chapters have feud pearly on seen gestions relating fo iteray students Kerry tory ot Seemdory conection, However the ably 10 ancy ee Interpret rary tvs rom a vary a gees and media ony tne iuitnent abel acento ene hin curser in Eg, (dnd Atmeca Stade furs ond o es important oper ‘trary histor which othe united ray oppent tobe aca ‘using mass of nares, ies and dats. we wish to oan ‘stra! undesanding of tet, however is beesary 1 tke ‘hal hse into comideration, Aigo understanding of terary txts presupposes not only Suen tnowtedge ofthe hsory othe guage, whch spare ‘eulryimportan when stung woes om eater prods We ‘musta be aware ofthe oct hat the full potential meanings ‘to tert onyemerge when we sty tin oral and er Sry content. the importance of erry hstertea ad tora owiadge for an undestanding of ieoy texts a srs {he fit chop It bomespotaltysnporant when Weare ‘noted wi sdteeaasons tpl eentsondsocoo. ‘tin theinterntianal Ira anon tn adion econ oa ‘ope tocvluateand appreciate the prteuonty ofan ndduat ‘nok is postion atu the genre sat andes foal innova {ons thatt may contain, we poses brood ere Asa rowed ‘mete re wo man fone that we mas ull wear to ‘elthewood om the ues the etaryastona fest fara ‘ay with some ofthe undomentl ene fear Mortog- py onda priminary overview ofthe destpmentandthe most [mportant patods of English and Aree trary sor. Ths orlading chapter ims toasart teed inating Hook ‘hove ond to oer some igh Inet prosoms aendan o gi ant mac yin Tamiya Pectin ~ Eom near hstovagrphy, of wll at noun the student 0 the ‘eta nego wth whic tary Rstosograpty opts ‘thous nowldoe of he mot prant dates oferary fist neural inpensble, es ch ve Important ‘cone conrenon wih some ef the fundamental concepts of Feary hioiogrphy trey theory ond teary sory ore fut nteraspendent rather than opposing Hels cary Fistor underpinned by numerous theoetea peesppos tes pow wily cop at erry histo are the reat of @ theo. based prove feonstton trary ioe ot of trotletve representation oftheteary po they pruce mod Sian wth ul ere {oval etegoras is ls general agreed tha he categories ‘Sedby rary hstosane peed ond genre designations fot cre co constr Asa comures of heconsacted ‘atu tary histo we shoul replete noon one story of Englah or Arran Mestre wit the premise hat Ihereton be sumeros hire of ny oe atonal iterate ‘and any one pod pecs gees and erry ureter tobe garded aster nto fer than ea eumng ject then he ution ‘otra and nether hictoncrprcpeof onstucon frei conadertien, In te quotation at he begining ott ‘hopes, bmw Meta (1992 3) sucac pots cut tat the ‘fmiton ot how thes oles re consraced a ental impor ‘ther Aero thepormets sed focte een anderrange tren often in Merery hor determine oo ag exten the ‘Moy nehchopesodar gents presented The question of what ‘horas tena test, prod orgene aaa hen {Sgenrly eid bythe peerenes othe terry hstortanand theory horse wos with Cael pation o teary {ntogoterermgtedin onder to be ableto reer catatese the dive genre mantestatons of or example the Erlsh ‘Sore of te Shalerpeareon era or the 2oiveenury Ameo novel ‘le should therfore fry be amore of the distinction between Tsay instal ecurenes ond phenomena fr exp, the publica cerry works changes the book nana tele $end fmol crass te) ond taton of tee ecirecrs nat sos, hear st Eiriapanted frm, Ye smbvant degoato iter Ror ‘att tthe stbjectonte tht to ay, thera eve ‘pron of Ita nd ts cconsruco and presentation 1 {owen anit ey Hoy 188, tte story wo ey Canatctan Detnitontrary hgh As ts serine ‘es whichstandon te bokshel re ute stn fe ei {2 bjs that they deere. sons arse costing ‘eins bers the etorptiverprsntatons efits ‘staria facts ond aca ray sical evens G Problems of Literary Historiography I Selection, Evaluation, Canon Formation, {and the Debate on the Canon deci aco i determining which works of Heatue ae grad tawny The si neo ery ded mepetes histo, Summarised by sing the metophorofomop by means cf whey) Ine within teary ster, and what try ag, 1 ey mr nipiStenopcontiheineytoufomectteeaascance | Seintonafitemu ted core’) RSs hameopirstcinpiatnc tatty Racecar foie obrndacinton tetas Srhaccre {roe ae tee repmmdon fhe ing oasinoacountl pn pin mal Bey ‘Sepa eucprae °CH mi en tery he] tenets Cong ato eed he Stein elon an concn wits | Sy a te ies tae on inisinotiwrrcieantagerandotengtacgetente | Stole ian odton oh he mal ee Heinle sate enced spean | etcetera ea ek Uy hasan ce ebccoecesreet Sco on oro of up eww we Pecrtwetslorcttmcompertsinetpatsagetic | Sonora ermal x yess icp. Biypoticion- wre enc nde casein Spor ade sey, ey nook weal Monona te meoper fe ncn ee mapond |e a sgn Werary __ fitoryshedssomelighton the potential ss ofliterar ister, cont terry histories tho adopt narrower dein Ge, uemimecsccecumcnesacts || ramen tne rane geearate {ction ihiniheobersceriatng est ee escalated ‘Symeoonhtonmerntberakcactinglon ec vey | Rl ene nee Sh ows intl enor one ngen is pw oun Miiyhoegeice iningeirkcteacicccc regen | Te tems afadaton od ercaan ody wll the ny sone ‘is ns ea wy er ‘selection The metaphor of the model or the map also draws attention to Eanes hich Cuthors. works and opens jan {xe fundamental questions concerning Iterary histarography: ‘important to be included. It is not a question af whether literary, Smsnton epadgnat efron sate somatic qunn. | Ten mae cin at fw cosy ‘sfcombination Whicelemen aera wane which Terris texts or vent) oe incuded in each reece ‘map? Acorng to which aspects oe the eet objec suc fre or embined wit sorhinwadulInerory tory? The {question af what sindaed endear hres pnts {toward the spicata which underpin the slat po. (es: These ters oe rately de expt however they om ‘edoced rom the geen aon snd more tat ape hn {8 tterary history, = wel os om thse that ae ead. Are al se athe flowing scion of te chap te tsk of od ‘oust secting and scaring dates fats and context pest Terry nsterine with a mmo problems Slt hr sdiston cer oe question o wet sci apd te team aon ces come the more gent when we conser ha tere con sean is custo, ets auton Sey elec Mery isons, even though the eect eres crduneryngvaleludgunentsdewrmine etureandobet hie hs “itera histories ther ploy on important portin he ts pettions Prcee known a Canon fomettor he te cano’ res 1 eee ‘Eihoietens nt rergordsospartcany importantes and ‘anen fay supenor Tons hele emong theo won of tomar {onep inane ave the tats xs though the poste factors of he canon, whieh nude securing te comity of Tray taen ad proving o ramon fer he sy of trate, should not Be eweaake, the prebemiateospects of non ication nove erraced @ good deal of tenon and robles fey Hay Secon tata, Cann aman 155‘asm in een yous, Literary Works arnt. ater al, pa ‘canon perv hey ae gradual cononioed egos ‘conan bymeans fection procedure which nee. trations (or example, ear reves, Mary ps ook trade academia and rary hetonography) ALEX ang ‘ArSutn dsb the procs of een omarion, which ees Sy ema te exon of the restr prof erry wos etn fad metry cn mp oon {he peeing tain This achcrlby fovea taper (nc parca ae fared and exe andcope these Rains {mosh conceaiedy ty. Al tention then fot on hi se, ‘reams ero (sous SN 1987.1) 3 Focuses of secon and eonosston ar generally conduc nthe bos of eegoes tht are cna) mpreat eh ‘mea parse erry histor ster The tol Ou tnd ears understanding of ltary and gener conven {Seles he prevalingcoslounes nd ese north day, eve gener tga he the detison of Mean ‘sl te vale Jugements and peerencs wndering erry Hstriogrphy ore sb ohare hange. Ral ot her Tear stn il eld numerous samples cheng the sssexment of te nojoy of great autos. Satay fer instance was rot velved ahi in the heen an ocgid i Is fame os one af the grate Bish authors ey ding the | ‘ure ibe at eenug or tng tne, there wos general ogrement on the sub of, hich tents soul be ined nthe canon of gst woth hols iterate verte past ree decades ower con tle controvers has been sparked by the quton of whet wore ‘rent plac in hisarerof Engi’ iat. Although hefner Prints the cson, wheeled canbe cere nt sy [Eb and reading lito ange numer estate for Ean ‘Gnd American ees connote cused etal ee sade hiteratire shoul be ware ofthe probit ond ie lating te canon formation, esearch eto minor berate ond feminist demand for ae coat cet oy wa omen have es arenes ofthe problems atendant en ony cone dd tte ‘ted freon. Demands for revo of he cone sed fan the view thet eran the prvtose metaphor, ler mope ct erry star aller ease sid a dtoned representation the Ieratwe of tygune peed The moltiaral nate of ‘Amaia Iertur es ben aired rinse, end sion af eontibutanson Natve Amescan, AfroAmencan Aner.) can Jews, Aslan Amercan and Chicane heatue In more | rsey a 5 SB nt nn ty yn tray ocr Za 1957101, he pref ‘net scaly mane y eatetonenc ey Sto, a panacea ea ek cra enooe kepaes ee a Problems of terry Historiography I adradon ond Contention So Scorn ce meaner eae Sei heen ares pean Siete sams Seno hoe ems eee a a es Te a ct ed osetia Siete een hee nr ats ‘Leen eis ee sree ier rae cai tas ri cers ee Taine ae Sen eee teeta Fel eee Ua come oat Spee a earn am Fei teers Sayre ete eto Se ee rere eis capi sac a tn en cer ecme ron neaas Se an ee gered eee Stars ca cot een or trea peony wes sine te Sr pe a ee eae rhe eer anbarag ts cre ie an eee nacre {Bh robles of Ley Hargapy I Pouaaon and oneatin 157 rr Fa oor Somer syetony Gacony