Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, New Jersey, United States of America,
2 New Jersey Department of Health, Trenton, New Jersey, United States of America, 3 Rutgers University,
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America
a1111111111 * gloria.post@dep.nj.gov
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111 Abstract
Perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs), a group of synthetic organic chemicals with industrial and com-
mercial uses, are of current concern because of increasing awareness of their presence in
drinking water and their potential to cause adverse health effects. PFAAs are distinctive among
OPEN ACCESS persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) contaminants because they are water soluble and
Citation: Post GB, Gleason JA, Cooper KR (2017) do not break down in the environment. This commentary discusses scientific and risk assess-
Key scientific issues in developing drinking water ment issues that impact the development of drinking water guidelines for PFAAs, including
guidelines for perfluoroalkyl acids: Contaminants of
choice of toxicological endpoints, uncertainty factors, and exposure assumptions used as their
emerging concern. PLoS Biol 15(12): e2002855.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2002855 basis. In experimental animals, PFAAs cause toxicity to the liver, the immune, endocrine, and
male reproductive systems, and the developing fetus and neonate. Low-dose effects include
Editor: Linda S. Birnbaum, National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences, United States of persistent delays in mammary gland development (perfluorooctanoic acid; PFOA) and sup-
America pression of immune response (perfluorooctane sulfonate; PFOS). In humans, even general
Published: December 20, 2017 population level exposures to some PFAAs are associated with health effects such as
increased serum lipids and liver enzymes, decreased vaccine response, and decreased birth
Copyright: © 2017 Post et al. This is an open
access article distributed under the terms of the weight. Ongoing exposures to even relatively low drinking water concentrations of long-chain
Creative Commons Attribution License, which PFAAs substantially increase human body burdens, which remain elevated for many years
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and after exposure ends. Notably, infants are a sensitive subpopulation for PFAA’s developmental
reproduction in any medium, provided the original
effects and receive higher exposures than adults from the same drinking water source. This
author and source are credited.
information, as well as emerging data from future studies, should be considered in the develop-
Funding: The authors received no specific funding
ment of health-protective and scientifically sound guidelines for PFAAs in drinking water.
for this work.
toxic effects similar to long-chain PFAAs [17], while the toxicity of others may not have been
adequately studied [13].
Both the scientific literature and awareness of PFAAs in US drinking water have greatly
increased in the past decade. A PubMed search for the keyword “PFOA” and synonyms
located only 244 citations before 2006, 667 from 2006–2010, and over 1,100 from 2011–2015.
Similarly, PFAA occurrence was investigated in only a few US public water systems (PWS)
near sites of industrial release until New Jersey conducted the first statewide studies of PFAAs
in drinking water, which included 54 PWS, in 2006 and 2009–2010 [3,18].
The recent US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Unregulated Contaminant Moni-
toring Rule 3 (UCMR3) study revealed previously unknown PFAA contamination in PWS
throughout the US [4]. UCMR3 required testing of all large US PWS (serving >10,000 people)
and a limited sample of smaller PWS for six PFAAs from 2013–2015. PFAAs were reported in
194 US PWS (about 4% of those tested) serving about 16.5 million people in 36 states and terri-
tories [19]. AFFF, particularly from discharge at military bases, is identified as the source of
many PFAA detections in UCMR3 including in some PWS with the highest levels.
UCMR3 reporting thresholds were much higher (e.g., 20 ng/L for PFOA; 40 ng/L for
PFOS) than in other studies of PFAAs in PWS such as the two conducted in New Jersey (4–5
ng/L; [3,18]). Because of these differences in reporting thresholds, PFAAs were detected sev-
eral times more frequently in the two New Jersey studies than in New Jersey UCMR3 monitor-
ing. Similarly, PFAAs are also present at levels too low to be reported in UCMR3 in many
additional PWS in other states [20]. Although PFAAs from industrial sources or AFFF were
recently discovered in several small US PWS, most small PWS were not tested in UCMR3.
Additionally, PFAAs have been detected in private drinking water wells adjacent to sources
(e.g., [21,22]), but many such wells remain untested.
Long-chain PFAAs including PFOA, PFOS, perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA; the nine-carbon
carboxylate), and perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS; the six-carbon sulfonate) are found in the
low parts per billion (ng/ml) range in the blood serum of almost all residents of the US and many
other nations [23,24]. Body burdens of these compounds result from exposures to both the
compounds themselves and conversion of precursors in the body [25]. These long-chain PFAAs
are not metabolized and are slowly excreted with human half-lives of several years. Thus, PFAA
serum levels remain elevated for many years after exposure ends. In contrast, short-chain PFAAs
such as the four-carbon compounds perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA) and perfluorobutane sulfo-
nate (PFBS) are eliminated much faster, with half-lives of 3 and 26 days, respectively [26,27].
While general population exposure to PFAAs and precursors comes from sources including
diet and consumer products, studies of exposed communities and predictions based on toxico-
kinetic factors show that low levels of PFAAs in drinking water (i.e., well below 100 ng/L [parts
per trillion]) substantially increase blood serum levels. These empirical observations and toxico-
kinetic models (Fig 2) consistently demonstrate that serum PFOA levels in adults increase on
average by more than 100 times the drinking water concentration [8,28], with greater predicted
increases for PFOS and PFNA. Notably, serum PFOA and PFOS were significantly higher
among individuals residing in zip codes with UCMR3 detections than in other zip codes,
although the study design tended to minimize differences between these two groups [29].
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2002855.t001
such as inability to determine the dose-response relationships for individual PFAAs due to co-
occurrence of other PFAAs, preclude the use of human data as the primary basis for PFAA
drinking water guidelines. Accordingly, animal data are the primary basis for all PFAA drink-
ing water guidelines developed so far by governmental organizations. This approach should be
reconsidered if future studies provide further support for use of human data.
Although current guidelines are not based on human data, considerable evidence linking
some PFAAs with multiple human health effects even within the general population exposure
range indicates the need for caution about additional exposure from drinking water [31].
Therefore, health-protective guidelines for PFAAs must consider the resulting increase in
blood serum levels (Fig 2). Unfortunately, this has not always been the case; for example, the
EPA PFOA guideline of 70 ng/L [58] will increase average blood serum levels from the general
population median of about 2 parts per billion (ppb) to about 10 ppb, with much greater
increases in infants [31]. Links with several health effects at lower serum levels indicate that
increases of this magnitude are not desirable and may not be protective of public health.
An important consideration in risk assessments is the choice of the toxicological endpoint(s)
used as their basis. Drinking water guidelines for PFAAs are generally based on non-cancer
effects, and guidelines based on sensitive non-cancer PFOA endpoints, such as the value recom-
mended by the New Jersey Drinking Water Quality Institute [31], protect for carcinogenicity at
the one-in-one-million lifetime risk level.
For PFOA, hepatic effects, delayed bone formation, and accelerated puberty are the primary
basis for recent guidelines [31,58], while more sensitive developmental endpoints such as
delayed mammary gland development would result in much lower values [8,31,59,60]. Delayed
mammary gland development from low doses of PFOA is well established, and several studies
linking PFOA with shorter duration of breastfeeding support potential human relevance [31].
References
1. Buck RC, Franklin J, Berger U, Conder JM, Cousins IT, de Voogt P, et al. Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluor-
oalkyl substances in the environment: terminology, classification, and origins. Integrated environmental
assessment and management. 2011; 7(4):513–41. Epub 2011/07/28. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.258
PMID: 21793199; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3214619.
2. Fromme H, Wockner M, Roscher E, Volkel W. ADONA and perfluoroalkylated substances in plasma
samples of German blood donors living in South Germany. International journal of hygiene and environ-
mental health. 2017; 220(2 Pt B):455–60. Epub 2017/01/12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.12.014
PMID: 28073630.
3. Post GB, Louis JB, Lippincott RL, Procopio NA. Occurrence of perfluorinated compounds in raw water
from New Jersey public drinking water systems. Environmental science & technology. 2013; 47
(23):13266–75. Epub 2013/11/06. https://doi.org/10.1021/es402884x PMID: 24187954.
4. USEPA (2017). Occurence Data for the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule—UCMR3 (2013–
2015) occurence data. Updated January 2017. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/dwucmr/
occurrence-data-unregulated-contaminant-monitoring-rule. Accessed April 10, 2017
5. Lindstrom AB, Strynar MJ, Libelo EL. Polyfluorinated compounds: past, present, and future. Environ-
mental science & technology. 2011; 45(19):7954–61. Epub 2011/08/27. https://doi.org/10.1021/
es2011622 PMID: 21866930.
6. Backe WJ, Day TC, Field JA. Zwitterionic, cationic, and anionic fluorinated chemicals in aqueous film
forming foam formulations and groundwater from U.S. military bases by nonaqueous large-volume
injection HPLC-MS/MS. Environmental science & technology. 2013; 47(10):5226–34. Epub 2013/04/
18. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3034999 PMID: 23590254.
7. Barzen-Hanson KA, Roberts SC, Choyke S, Oetjen K, McAlees A, Riddell N, et al. Discovery of 40 Clas-
ses of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Historical Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (AFFFs) and
AFFF-Impacted Groundwater. Environmental science & technology. 2017; 51(4):2047–57. Epub 2017/
01/19. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05843 PMID: 28098989.
8. Post GB, Cohn PD, Cooper KR. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), an emerging drinking water contami-
nant: a critical review of recent literature. Environmental research. 2012; 116:93–117. Epub 2012/05/
09. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2012.03.007 PMID: 22560884.
9. USEPA. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) under TSCA. PFOA Stewardship Program.
Available from: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/and-
polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfass-under-tsca. Accessed April 25, 2017.
10. OECD (2015). Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Working Towards a Global
Emission Inventory of PFCAs—Status Quo and the Way Forward. OECD, Environment, Health and
Safety Publications. Series on Risk Management, No. 30 Available from: http://www.oecd.org/
chemicalsafety/risk-management/Working%20Towards%20a%20Global%20Emission%20Inventory%
20of%20PFASS.pdf. Accessed April 10, 2017
11. Cousins IT, Vestergren R, Wang Z, Scheringer M, McLachlan MS. The precautionary principle and
chemicals management: The example of perfluoroalkyl acids in groundwater. Environment interna-
tional. 2016; 94:331–40. Epub 2016/06/24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.044 PMID:
27337597.