You are on page 1of 1

THE COMPARISON OF EUTOPIC PPARγ IN THE PATIENT WITH

ENDOMETRIOSIS AND NON ENDOMETRIOSIS


Muharam R, Olivia L, Fuady M, Harahap JS
Departement of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine University of Indonesia
Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital
Jakarta

INTRODUCTION RESULTS DISCUSSION


Of the 50 subjects studied, 1 subject experienced endometriosis which PPARγ concentrations of endometrial tissue in all groups had a
The increase of proinflammatory cytokines in patients with endometriosis has
was not detected so that it was immediately excluded from statistical range that was not much different with the lowest value of
been reported in several studies.2,3 The activation of PPARγ can increase insulin
analysis. PPARγ value of endometrial tissue has collected was not 19.28 ng / μl and the highest concentration of 30.42 ng / μl, while
sensitization and increase glucose metabolism, cells differentiation,
normally distributed (Kolmogorov - Smirnov and Saphiro Wilk test endometriosis tissue had the lowest value of 18.33 ng / μl and the
apoptosis, and inflammation. The aim of this study is to determine the
for normality), but based on the coefficient of variance. The standard highest value was 28.61 ng / μl. The standard deviation was small
comparison of eutopic endometrial PPARγ receptors in the patient with
deviation divided by the average <0.2 could be concluded normal for eutopic 2.29 and ectopic 2.52. Each sample of endometrial tissue
endometriosis and nonendomteriosis.
distribution both endometriosis and control group. PPARγ levels of and endometriosis tissue which was extracted by RNA first, each
endometrial tissue in all subjects had an average of 22.34 ± 2.27 ng / μL. sample had equalized weight, which was 30 mg. On the other hand,
The mean value of PPARγ expression of endometrial tissue in the endometrial tissue and endometriosis tissue of endometriosis patients
METHODS control group was 22.52 ± 2.28 ng / μL and PPARγ expression of o r i g i n a t e f r o m t h e s a m e c e l l o r i g i n .
This study involved the patients of Gynecology Polyclinic and Operating endometrial tissue in the endometriosis group was 22,16 ± 2,29 ng/μL.
Room of RSCM and Yasmin RSCM Kencana clinic who would undergo The concentration of eutopic control when compared with eutopic
surgery at Obstetry and Gynecology Departement of Medical Faculty of endometriosis showed higher results for eutopic control (eutopic 22.52
Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta. Sampling was Table 1.The comparison of endometrial tissue expression in the ± 2.28 and ectopic 22.16 ± 2.29ng / μl). A normal eutopic endometrium
begun from December 2016 to October 2017. endometriosis group and control
has a gamma PPAR which is slightly more that can be activated by
The subjects of this study were taken by consecutive sampling, who are PPARγ Mean sd other endogenous ligands, such as 14-prostaglandin J2, 15 deoxy
diagnosed with endometriosis who underwent laparoscopy and confirmed by Endometrial 22,52 2,28 delta-12, the origin of essential fat, eicosanoid, phytanic acid,
tissue of
histophathology examination at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital nonendometriosis palmitolethanolamide, nirolenoleic acid.15
Endometrial 22,16 2,29
After laparoscopy is performed in the operating room, a biopsy of endometrial tissue of

tissue is performed. Patients were diagnosed endometriosis based on direct endometriosis CONCLUSIONS
observational laparoscopic the endometriosis lesion are included to Based on the comparison result, the eutopic concentration of control
endometriosis group. The samples tissue of endometriosis issent to an integrated was higher than eutopic endometriosis.
laboratory of FKUI/ RSCM for real time PCR examination to see the expression
mRNA PPARγ of endometrial tissue. Laboratory examination results are REFERENCES
1. Jacoeb TZ. Pengertian Endometriosis. In: Hadisaputra W, editor. Panduan Kinis dan Algoritme Penanganan
included in the table and analyzed to see how the similarities, differences, how Endometriosis 1. 1 ed. Jakarta: CV. Sagung Seto; 2009. p. 9.
2. Oral E, Olive DL, Arici A. The peritoneal environment in endometriosis. Hum Reprod Update. 1996;2(5):385 – 398.
the average difference between eutopic endometrial PPARγ mRNA expression in 3. Gupta S, Agarwal A, Sekhon L, Krajcir N, Cocuzza M, Falcone T. Serum and peritoneal abnormalities in
endometriosis: potential use as diagnostic markers. Minerva Ginecol. 2006;58(6):527– 551.
endometriosis and non-endometriosis patients. The endometrial eutopic tissue 4. Kiec-Wilk B, Dembinska-Kiec A, Olszanecka A, Bodzioch M, Kawecka-Jaszcz K. The selected pathophysiological
aspects of PPARs activation. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2005;56(2):149 – 162.
was taken from curettage with endometrial pipelle shortly after the patients were 5. Ren P, Zhang Y, Huang Y, Yang Y, Jiang M. Functions of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma
(PPARgamma) in Gynecologic Disorders. Clin Med
anesthesia and then inserted intothe tube containing 500 μl later RNA. Then Picture 1. Boxplot comparison of PPARγ mRNA expression of endometrial 6. Dilmy et al. PPARy Expression in Eutopic and Ectopic Endometrium of Reproductive Age Women with
Endometriosis. Indones j obstet gynecol. 2015;3(4):200-205.
tissue between the control group and endometriosis
stored at -80oC in an integrated laboratory of FKUI. 7. Schopfer FJ, Lin Y, Baker PR, Cui T, Garcia-Barrio M, Zhang J, et al. Nitrolinoleic acid: an endogenous
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligand. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(7):2340 – 2345.

You might also like