‘Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Folational Frame Theory, and the Third Wave of ‘Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies Sreven C Hoes eyo Ne ans ‘Sie fn! pce set Styl cle Tew woe echt ar det hn rs ae ‘Stns cp inn pe or ‘hn mashes pn Ace iirc hwy AC annem TACT coma ot then nee a ‘he eng ce: Roson ne Tey RF) RF alae yore fe mt cpl vast un a [Graentoe pce gringo ahh Seine Scere amd see see ane tn temo oe (ver thet sso yers gies mb of beta hepits ave merged ta donot teal to dna eatin whine Be. Earp iniose Diese Bence erpy CB Lien, 199) Pe til Ale Pyehrapy (FAP: Kohls & Tol, 193, tmegatve Behavioral Coupe They (BCT, Jacobson Chasers, 1990) and Micfubes- Based Cogine herapy (MCT, Sega, Wins, Teale, 2002 song several oes eg. Borkoves Roemer, 198, MeCuloueh 2oo0, Nari 0: Manel Adi ace, 201; Roemer Ori, say ac ine pp note kav et soa of it ese {iva presen te aes Ma Bey 20 “rele og pa yey nyo2002) No one fester unites these new metho, buts fave ventured no ‘rest radially reseed fr to lssempatcl wings of lel nerve. ‘on and analy, emphasizing seh ies a aecoptanes, idles, cop ‘ve dtuion, dies, ales, petal, and Felalonhi, Thee heh ‘are often more experanil han dacs to undeyingpueeopies sre more contests thn mec. “Accptstew a Comstent Therapy (ACT, sida one wor, not ase ‘es; Hayes, Seah e Wilson, 199) anthro his wroup. ACT i bad to catagrie. Tne Sadia distinctions (eg, behavioral Yrs Ges Usa erat cog) soar tobe more confusing ha clang THe recall speshing, ACT 5 gous behavior, bat ets sed on 3 com [stent cnpncal nays of hamn cognition (elaenal Frame Theor Ur RET Hayes Barer Holmes, Rech, 2001) Based ia clic beter Salyi, ACT nevetbelss seriously adess sues of spilt, values. tnd self enone er such spin, Sih eaogren ambiguity i shared wil the iajnty of theae new methods For example, le ACT ss supposed “pei” and MBCT is suppsedly "ogntive he vo seem ch more lol ale th eter re sa, Becks cognatve hevapy he on had trea dsestzaton onthe oe, ‘When sett of noms evens co-oecur that ae difiet wo categorize using wellesublsed distinsions, sometimes the el els reorganizing Behave therapy ha edly ved ough pesiods of reorganization na ‘Splnary Ite tat aw enters its ith dade Nb maybe suc ese The purpose of this atic to explain ACT and to show how teas othe inllecon ond practi evolution that coms to be unr way Wan eb leery ‘The Waves of Behavior Therapy Behavior therapy canbe roughly categorized nt thre wats or gener: ine (nc war one spect esd, we il ne he ere oie lortherpy oferta teen rane of bevionl and copie heap, {om cla bhava rly toc therapy) What ean by 2 "wave ‘Sarat or formulation of dint ssumpion, methods ad gal, sme ‘pict, hit help ganze eseareh thery, and pectic The Ft Wave “The fst wane of havior therapy was in part ebelion sein prevaling lineal eoncepions, Easy behav thespns beleved tha theories sho be bul upon the Setock of sientialywellextsised base eile, tn tha plied technologies shouldbe wellspeted and igo ested In'ontast esting eles tations bad vey oor lnk osetia tstblabed base enipes, vague speciation of nervetions an weab Scintie evidenem msppor ofthe mpct fee strveatons. an nc ‘Wis (1978 showed ie dul meteoric and empirical ence wherACHR AND HE MWD WAVEOF REUAMOR THERAPY 6S they defined behvior therapy in tars of “peratonly defined ering the ty and canoe to wel-esablbed experimental paradigms”. 7 The objections fo esting ei valitons were shred by Bath ofthe rmsjor sem within behavior therapy atte tine, oobi and tae analysis and for that eas Wht united early baie traps tremode frame testa dileancs song thet, Both of es tad hone were sony sintieslyse, a ts could unite part i ‘ou maton and empirical weakaes of competing clin paral “Th cre ofthe abjecton to sna apd humana concos Was et thecetcal and empirical, but the spctcagumens were sbbtante. For ramp, Fre’ eve of Lt Hats (924/195) war skewered by etry ehavor rapists, who ridiculed the amazing phe of peyeowalye fancy te eae sty Sood Bandura. 1900 pp. 11-13; Wolpe & Rach ‘man, 1960), Fre ego that Lite Hans wa fing to leave hae a3 ‘ean of siding Ocal elings and sulin estan anxiety The cor ‘ote remoning tht fed ths conclusion fclodd cals that t hase {ving though gt silat ees leaving he an, Toad eats hs prognnt woman, abd at "te fling Rese wasnt oly is dying Fate but lo is mother chibi” (Feu, 1985, p 128). eave hers (Gope & Rachnan, 1960) had afar sper explanation, Since Lil Hans td seen hore ro eat fll ver ast the ces and Steams of ides (Giang sve other bese elated fighting evens), it was mor lass "hat he sided png outside Deca he Had earned eof ores. Sea tor tera ped fan tte employ of pajehoualte thera by Sowing expenmenully tat simple contingencies could realy pect Tehvioe tht wold occasion bua pujelnalyteineretion (6, Asllon, Haughton Hughes, 1965), ‘Behavior herp fosed deel on peolonate behavior and ereton, ‘asd on coining nd no Beare! principles The gal wouldaot be sa th hypusie ncnciu fee desies Lite Ha ac ‘Shoal Paychoaalae rial this appreach eg Bookbinder 196. ‘Sehramt Sly 1966) onthe pounds dat syn substuton weal er ‘utp sper behaviors guns, ott enonsions dss weuld oe Stel ecesry defense chars But hs clam tslf was an object of | {etaor! enim (eg, Yates 1988) and, while seme posible om a ‘etal pointe view (Banda, 193, pp. 4845), aan empirical mater proved tote mich eso = problem than psychoanalyst suposed Nur= ‘orger& Hinge 1973). ‘Wi a diet change te focus came also a certain namoing of vision, omever The ete analytic and umamitieconepa were cca et, They penealy wee designed to address fgimental human ese ck vat poopie want ot of Heo why is ado be human. Unaunat.5 ‘agus conepis were rece thelr eying prpons lo Deas re ‘ively ntastionable