ENGLI111 Honors Project 1 Peer Review 2 pate: V/Z6/ 16, Reviewer: Givi Writer: Wand cavallare ment changes = list the revisions here. What argument cl shaniges were made? Pull details out bout concems. Are they 1. Before you read the essay, ask what the writer has revised were made? What do they think the strongest partis? What structural of the writer (information that may not be in the essay — yet). Then ask the writer al happy with this piece of work? If not, why not? Take careful, ‘detailed notes (list form is fine). = Alot - havea MOA -added pnotrs ee - wen ve expuins Clack pact) - ingore deel Sw mage — MEM aret a pan - me see ae toy 8 uPrmnannere /ot tw alot conta 2 €s 2. Read the essay without marking it and write a response to the writer's concems (from above). Do the same things concem you? If so, why? If not, why not? Again, more detail/specificity is better than less. We want to get down to sentence, phrase, and word choice level here. And, again, a list of phrases works here, “wate MUS VOU pha ecf essog — (Bes Ve mantopte YF wnttd soues Cie vruem) - wv . af Sawe Mig Mien we trie \Fe eae © 1A our mein nm 3. Let's get physical: First, use a bright color to map the essay — you could, for example, draw boxes around sections that deal with a single example/subject. Then, read through the essay and underline/check/star places that are problematic OR interesting OR working very well. Working with your peer reviewer, create a code you both use: a check for interesting, a star for problematic, or similar. Comment here on the *best* or most interesting places you find. Can you find a more interesting place for the essay to begin? 4. Is the essay meeting the spirit of the assignment? Our goal is to explore. When we explore, we tend to begin in one place and end up somewhere else. 1s that happening? How does exploring show up in the text? What can the author do to show more exploration? How do you see the author exploring? Ys, i % chewy WE aur explores Ver wmptc avd Onan ayes eer ete Mur dey weit S- Ro Crrneny Ger) 5. What's still missing from this essay? Also consider what the writer has done to specifically address the audience (your peers in this class) ~ exactly what characteristics of the essay are aimed at the audience of your peers? Is the author still writing for that anonymous, distant grader person? (Flip the page!) W defini 4 Miemgy Me & ymat? wikR Ne a (Pr © WwRemdrn ove Co Wier goes Misa y mann nave ft? do with He pel?