ScienceDirect

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect
Procedia Computer Science 00 (2018) 000–000
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
Procedia Computer Science 00 (2018) 000–000
www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
ScienceDirect
Procedia Computer Science 135 (2018) 544–552

3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Computational Intelligence 2018

3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Computational Intelligence 2018
A Fuzzy Goal Programming Model
For Production Planning
A Fuzzy Goal in Furniture
Programming Company
Model
For Production Planning in Furniture Company
Siti Komsiyaha, Meilianab, Hasegaf Ekaputera Centika a
Siti Komsiyaha, Meilianab, Hasegaf Ekaputera Centika a
a
Mathematics Department, School of Computer Science, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta,
Indonesia 11480
b
Computer Science Department, School of Computer Science, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta,
a
Mathematics Department, School of Computer Science, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta,
Indonesia 11480
Indonesia 11480
b
Computer Science Department, School of Computer Science, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta,
Indonesia 11480

Abstract

In the industrial world, there is always a problem of supply chain and always be for a long time. Production planning is one of its
Abstract
stages. Almost all of companies want to make production process efficient and optimized with minimum expenses while still
meet
In thewith the market
industrial world,demand. This paper
there is always presentofproduction
a problem planning
supply chain problem
and always in afurniture
be for company
long time. with planning
Production different is
operational
one of its
constraint,
stages. Almostincluding
all ofproduction
companiestime, wantwarehouse capacity, and
to make production quantity
process of rawand
efficient materials.
optimizedThewith
fuzzyminimum
goal programming appliedstill
expenses while to
maximize
meet with thethe profit,
marketminimize
demand. the Thisproduction cost production
paper present and minimize raw materials
planning problemcost. In this paper
in furniture was conducted
company at the
with different furniture
operational
company
constraint,CV. Arte Jaya
including which aims
production time,towarehouse
help company for decision
capacity, making
and quantity of regarding to production
raw materials. The fuzzyplanning model by using
goal programming fuzzy
applied to
goal programming.
maximize the profit,This Method
minimize theis production
suitable forcost
CV.andArteminimize
Jaya because the objective
raw materials cost.function can bewas
In this paper adapted to preferences
conducted of the
at the furniture
company.
company CV. TheArte
result obtained
Jaya which application
aims to helpprogram
companyforforsolving decision
decision makingmaking problem
regarding about theplanning
to production amountmodel
of production
by usingthat
fuzzyis
exact and still meetThis
goal programming. with the market
Method demand.
is suitable TheArte
for CV. application program
Jaya because that has function
the objective been created
can beisadapted
able totosimplify the of
preferences user's
the
performance
company. Theofresult
CV. Arte Jaya. application program for solving decision making problem about the amount of production that is
obtained
exact and still meet with the market demand. The application program that has been created is able to simplify the user's
performance of CV. Arte Jaya.
© 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
© 2018
This The
is an openAuthors.
accessPublished by Elsevier
article under Ltd.
the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Selection
© 2018 The andAuthors.
peer-review underby
Published responsibility
Elsevier Ltd.of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Computational
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Computational
Intelligence
This 2018.
is an open
Intelligence access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
2018.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Computational
Keywords:
IntelligenceSupply
2018.chain, Decision making, Production planning, Fuzzy goal programming

Keywords: Supply chain, Decision making, Production planning, Fuzzy goal programming

1877-0509 © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Selection
1877-0509and peer-review
© 2018 under responsibility
The Authors. of the 3rdLtd.
Published by Elsevier International Conference on Computer Science and Computational Intelligence 2018.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Computational Intelligence 2018.

1877-0509 © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Computational
Intelligence 2018.
10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.207
 Siti Komsiyah et al. / Procedia Computer Science 135 (2018) 544–552 545
2 Siti Komsiyah/ Procedia Computer Science 00 (2018) 000–000

1. Introduction

In today’s era, business competition is no longer between the companies but does involve some production
planning problem. The production planning problem involves the cost factor in which from these factors it will
determine the income or benefits to be obtained from the company. Thus it need for good coordination between
suppliers and companies to be able to satisfy the customer in terms of both quality and cost which when the supplier
provides the raw material with good quality and as well as the cost, the manufacturing company will produce
products of good quality and low production costs so the products can satisfy the consumers in terms of both quality
and price. With the cost of raw materials can be moved up and down, a company must be smart in making decisions
what products will be produced and what quantities which is exact but still meet the needs of the market. Taking into
the cost factor allows the company to obtain the maximum benefit with minimum cost expenditures. Production
planning is a complicated task that requires cooperation among multiple functional units in any organization,
Therefore, new tools for production planning are required that consider these issues [5]. To achieve this, in this paper
use fuzzy goal programming in decision making problems to determine production plans.
Some researchers has already applied a fuzzy goal programming that is Gupta and Bhattacharjee [1] presents two
weighted fuzzy goal programming methods to solve multiobjective goal programming problem , Li et al. [2] applied
the fuzzy goal programming with multiple priorities via generalized varying-domain optimization method. Reddy et
al. [3] use fuzzy goal programming approaches in production centers selection problem for a manufacturing firm of
supply chain under production centers’ uncertainty and demand uncertainty. And Singh et al. [4] presents fuzzy goal
programming approach to multiobjective linear plus linear fractional programming problem.
A case study in this paper was conducted CV Arte Jaya which is a company engaged in the production of
furniture. Until now CV. Arte Jaya using prediction of the amount of production but using that method often
spending exceeded budget it should be. CV. Arte Jaya want to achieve a target or the goals that the company afloat
and not lose even lose customers. Target which to be achieved by CV. Arte Jaya is the minimum target profit to be
obtained, the maximum target expenditure of raw material costs, and the maximum target production expenses.
Thus, in this paper use fuzzy goal programming to perform troubleshooting on the amount of production in order to
obtain the optimal results and meet the targets or criteria of CV. Arte Jaya..

2. Literature Review

2.1 Fuzzy Goal Programming (FGP)

The FGP problem formulated as [6] :

Find 𝑥𝑥 ∗
Maximize λ
To satisfy:
𝜇𝜇𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 (𝑥𝑥) ≥ λ (1)
𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 ≤ 𝑏𝑏, 𝑥𝑥 ≥ 0 (2)
where the fuzzy membership function each objective functions are :
if 𝐹𝐹𝑖𝑖 (𝑥𝑥) ≤ 𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖 then

1 , 𝐹𝐹𝑖𝑖 (𝑥𝑥) ≤ 𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖

𝑈𝑈𝑖𝑖 −𝐹𝐹𝑖𝑖 (𝑥𝑥)
𝜇𝜇𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 (𝑥𝑥) = {𝑈𝑈 −𝑓𝑓 , 𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 < 𝐹𝐹𝑖𝑖 (𝑥𝑥) ≤ 𝑈𝑈𝑖𝑖 (3)
𝑖𝑖 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖
0 , 𝐹𝐹𝑖𝑖 (𝑥𝑥) ≥ 𝑈𝑈𝑖𝑖

If 𝐹𝐹𝑖𝑖 (𝑥𝑥) ≥ 𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖 , then

1 , 𝐹𝐹𝑖𝑖 (𝑥𝑥) ≥ 𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖
𝐹𝐹𝑖𝑖 (𝑥𝑥)−𝐿𝐿𝑖𝑖
𝜇𝜇𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 (𝑥𝑥) = {𝑓𝑓 , 𝐿𝐿𝑖𝑖 < 𝐹𝐹𝑖𝑖 (𝑥𝑥) ≤ 𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 (4)
𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 −𝐿𝐿 𝑖𝑖
0 , 𝐹𝐹𝑖𝑖 (𝑥𝑥) ≤ 𝐿𝐿𝑖𝑖
546 Siti Komsiyah et al. / Procedia Computer Science 135 (2018) 544–552
Author name / Procedia Computer Science 00 (2018) 000–000 3

The membership function form of equation (3) and (4) can be draw as following Fig 1.

1 1

𝜇𝜇𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 (𝑥𝑥) 𝐹𝐹𝑖𝑖 (𝑥𝑥) 𝜇𝜇𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 (𝑥𝑥) 𝐹𝐹𝑖𝑖 (𝑥𝑥)

0 𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 𝑈𝑈𝑖𝑖 0 𝐿𝐿𝑖𝑖 𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖 𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚

0 a 0 a
Fig 1. Membership function form

The greater the value of λ, the fuzzy membership value for each function of the objective function will be greater
so that the solution obtained near the optimal value.

2.2 Fuzzy Goal Programming Model

From observations and interviews with the CV. Arte Jaya the following model is a model to be applied in the CV.
Arte Jaya:

Goal function:
Max 𝜆𝜆 (5)
Constraint function:
𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏 𝑞𝑞
∑𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑖 𝑏𝑏𝑖𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 ∗ 𝑥𝑥𝑖𝑖 − ∑𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑖 𝑃𝑃𝑖𝑖 ∗ 𝑥𝑥𝑖𝑖 − ∑𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑖 ∑𝑚𝑚
𝑗𝑗 𝑏𝑏𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 ∗ 𝑥𝑥𝑖𝑖 − ∑𝑘𝑘 𝑓𝑓𝑘𝑘 ∗ 𝑔𝑔𝑘𝑘 − (𝑍𝑍 ∗ − 𝑍𝑍̅)𝜆𝜆 ≥ 𝑍𝑍̅ (6)
𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏
∑𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑖 ∑𝑚𝑚 𝑗𝑗 𝑏𝑏𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 ∗ 𝑥𝑥𝑖𝑖 + (𝐵𝐵̅ − 𝐵𝐵 ∗ )𝜆𝜆 ≤ 𝐵𝐵̅ (7)
∑𝑖𝑖 𝑃𝑃𝑖𝑖 ∗ 𝑥𝑥𝑖𝑖 + (𝑃𝑃̅ − 𝑃𝑃 ∗ )𝜆𝜆 ≤ 𝑃𝑃̅
𝑛𝑛
(8)
𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝
𝑐𝑐 𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 ≤ ∑𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑖 𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑖 ∗ 𝑥𝑥𝑖𝑖 ≤ 𝑐𝑐 𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 (9)
∑𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑖(𝑥𝑥𝑖𝑖 + 𝑥𝑥𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖−1 ) ∗ 𝐿𝐿𝑖𝑖 ≤ 𝑐𝑐 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 (10)
∑𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑖 ∑𝑚𝑚 𝑚𝑚
𝑗𝑗 𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 ≤ ∑𝑗𝑗 𝑐𝑐𝑗𝑗 (11)
𝑛𝑛 𝑛𝑛 𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚
∑𝑖𝑖 𝑥𝑥𝑖𝑖 ≥ ∑𝑖𝑖 𝑥𝑥𝑖𝑖 (12)
∑𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑖 𝑥𝑥𝑖𝑖 ≤ ∑𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑖 𝑥𝑥𝑖𝑖𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 (13)

Where :
Index symbol
i : Index of types of product (1,2,3,…,n)
j : Index of types of material (kaca, triplek 18 mm,…)
k : Index of worker (1,2,3,…q)
w : Index of time period (1,2,3,…)

Parameter symbol
𝑥𝑥𝑖𝑖 : Quantity of product i
𝑏𝑏𝑖𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 : Selling price of product i
𝑃𝑃𝑖𝑖 : Production cost of product i
𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏
𝑏𝑏𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 : Purchase cost of material j to produce product i
𝑓𝑓𝑘𝑘 : Cost of worker k
 Siti Komsiyah et al. / Procedia Computer Science 135 (2018) 544–552 547
4 Siti Komsiyah/ Procedia Computer Science 00 (2018) 000–000

𝑔𝑔𝑘𝑘 : Worker k
𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝
𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑖 : Time required to manufacture products i
𝑐𝑐 𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 : Minimal capacity of production time
𝑐𝑐 𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 : Maximal capacity of production time
𝑥𝑥𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖−1 : Quantity of product i which has been produced from the previous period and remained in storage
𝐿𝐿𝑖𝑖 : Spacious storage of products i
𝑐𝑐 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 : Available storage capacity
𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 : Quantity of material j which is used to manufacture of product i
𝑐𝑐𝑗𝑗 : The capacity of raw materials j available in the warehouse
𝑥𝑥𝑖𝑖𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 : The minimum production quantity for product I which specified by the company
𝑥𝑥𝑖𝑖𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 : The maximum production quantity for product I which specified by the company
𝑍𝑍 ∗ : The Maximum profit which obtained by using linear programming
𝑍𝑍̅ : The Minimum profit value which want to be obtained by company
𝐵𝐵∗ : The minimum value of raw material which obtained by using linear programming
𝐵𝐵̅ : The Maximum value of raw material which determined by company
𝑃𝑃 ∗ : The minimum value of production cost which obtained by using linear programming.
𝑃𝑃̅ : The Maximum value of production cost which determined by company

3. Material and Method

3.1 Data Analysis

The data used in this paper are primary data or data taken directly from the CV. Arte Jaya. Data is collected by
observation and direct interview with owner CV. Arte Jaya. Data being collected includes data products sold by CV.
Arte Jaya, the data of raw materials, data on the use of raw materials for a product, the data of purchase of raw
materials, the production time of a product, production cost data for a product, the data of sales price of a product,
the operating hours of employees, labor costs, and warehouse area.

3.2 Fuzzy Goal Programming Methods

The data obtained from CV. Arte Jaya then be analyzed in which will build a model of mathematical equations
that will be the base in solving optimization problems on the proper production quantity and in accordance with the
criteria of CV. Arte Jaya using Fuzzy Goal Programming. Once the mathematical equation model has been
constructed then the number of production optimization problems can be solved.
The steps in Fuzzy Goal Programming is :
a) Choose products that want to be optimized.
b) Entering input values for each product like product selling prices, costs of production, the minimum amount of
production, and the maximum amount of production.
c) Input three levels of aspiration or goal function to be achieved.
d) Go to the first calculation phase, seeking optimal value for the third factor that is maximize profits, minimize
costs of raw materials, and minimize production costs. If there is no an optimal solution to the first calculation phase
then go back to step b.
e) Comparing the three level 3 aspirations with the optimal value goal factors. If all three levels of aspiration meets
the requirements then phase calculation using Fuzzy Goal Programming can be done. If there is an aspiration level
which does not meet the requirements then go back to step c.
f) Establish a Fuzzy Goal Programming calculation model.
g) Entry into the calculation phase Fuzzy Goal Programming. Fuzzy Goal Programming calculations model will
yield a solution that will be displayed on the screen. When Fuzzy Goal Programming model not produce a solution
then go back to step b.

A flowchart for fuzzy goal programming model for production planning can be seen in Fig 2
548 Siti Komsiyah
Author et al. / Procedia
name / Procedia ComputerComputer
Science Science 135
00 (2018) (2018) 544–552
000–000 5

c
Fig 2. Flowchart for fuzzy goal programming.

4. Simulation Result and Discussion

The simulation show that the firm wants to produce products : student desk, cabinet, work table, bed divan, and
wardrobe. The following data taken by the company:

Table 1 Input Data for Simulation

No Product Name (x) Selling Price (IDR) Production Cost (IDR) Min Production (Unit) Max Production (Unit)
1 student desk 8.500.000 700.000 0 10
2 cabinet 10.000.000 800.000 5 7
3 work table 5.000.000 600.000 0 10
4 bed divan 8.000.000 750.000 2 10
5 wardrobe 36.000.000 2.000.000 3 8
 Siti Komsiyah et al. / Procedia Computer Science 135 (2018) 544–552 549
6 Siti Komsiyah/ Procedia Computer Science 00 (2018) 000–000

Suppose the company has a target for minimum profit to be obtained is IDR. 70.000.000, -, target for maximum
cost of raw material to be spent is IDR. 150.000.000, - and targets for maximum production costs to be spent is
IDR. 30.000.000, -

The results of data processing

Goal function:
1).Maximize of Profit
8500 𝑥𝑥1 + 10000 𝑥𝑥2 + 5000 𝑥𝑥3 + 8000 𝑥𝑥4 + 36000 𝑥𝑥5
3895 𝑥𝑥1 + 5340𝑥𝑥2 + 2275 𝑥𝑥3 + 3170 𝑥𝑥4 + 13730 𝑥𝑥5
700 𝑥𝑥1 + 800 𝑥𝑥2 + 600 𝑥𝑥3 + 750 𝑥𝑥4 + 2000 𝑥𝑥5
+50000
________ _____ −
3905 𝑥𝑥1 + 3860 𝑥𝑥2 + 2125 𝑥𝑥3 + 4080 𝑥𝑥4 + 20270 𝑥𝑥5 − 50000

2). Minimize of Material Cost

650 𝑥𝑥1
1020 𝑥𝑥1 + 1275 𝑥𝑥2 + 765 𝑥𝑥3 + 1020 𝑥𝑥4 + 3060 𝑥𝑥5
+ 1170 𝑥𝑥5
775 x1 + 465 x2 + 310 x3 + 775 𝑥𝑥4
+ 375 𝑥𝑥4 + 1000 𝑥𝑥5
1200 𝑥𝑥1 + 500 𝑥𝑥4 + 3500 𝑥𝑥5
250 𝑥𝑥1 + 500 𝑥𝑥4 + 5000 𝑥𝑥5
3600 𝑥𝑥2 + 1200 𝑥𝑥3
__ +
3895 𝑥𝑥1 + 5340𝑥𝑥2 + 2275 𝑥𝑥3 + 3170 𝑥𝑥4 + 13730 𝑥𝑥5

3). Minimize of Production Cost

700 𝑥𝑥1 + 800 𝑥𝑥2 + 600 𝑥𝑥3 + 750 𝑥𝑥4 + 2000 𝑥𝑥5

Constraint function:
1). Production time => 24 ≤ 𝑥𝑥1 + 0.5 𝑥𝑥2 + 0.5 𝑥𝑥3 + 𝑥𝑥4 + 3.125 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 25
2). Inventory =>0.78 𝑥𝑥1 + 1.5 𝑥𝑥2 + 1.2 𝑥𝑥3 + 2 𝑥𝑥4 + 1.5 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 250
3). Materials
Glass => 𝑥𝑥1 ≤ 100
triplex 18 mm => 4 𝑥𝑥1 + 5 𝑥𝑥2 + 3 𝑥𝑥3 + 4 𝑥𝑥4 + 12 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 600
triplex 15 mm => 6 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 300
triplex 12 mm => 5 𝑥𝑥1 + 3 𝑥𝑥2 + 2 𝑥𝑥3 + 5 𝑥𝑥4 ≤ 600
triplex 9 mm => 3 𝑥𝑥4 + 8 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 300
melaminto => 12 𝑥𝑥1 + 5 𝑥𝑥4 + 35 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 600
paint => 𝑥𝑥1 + 2 𝑥𝑥4 + 20 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 300
HPL => 6 𝑥𝑥2 + 2 𝑥𝑥3 ≤ 300
4). Quantity of product student desk (min and max) => 0 ≤ 𝑥𝑥2 ≤ 10
5). Quantity of product cabinet (min and max) => 5 ≤ 𝑥𝑥2 ≤ 7
6). Quantity of product work table (min and max) => 0 ≤ 𝑥𝑥2 ≤ 10
7). Quantity of product bed divan (min and max) => 2 ≤ 𝑥𝑥2 ≤ 10
8). Quantity of product wardrobe (min and max) => 3 ≤ 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 8

The optimum profit obtained using linear programming is:

𝑍𝑍 ∗ = 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼. 111.664.800, −
The optimum material cost obtained using linear programming is:
𝐵𝐵∗ = 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼. 107.866.875, −
550 Siti Komsiyah et al. / Procedia Computer Science 135 (2018) 544–552
Author name / Procedia Computer Science 00 (2018) 000–000 7

The optimum production cost obtained using linear programming is:

𝑃𝑃 ∗ = 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼. 17.980.000, −

For aspiration levels of profit is acceptable because the value of 𝑍𝑍 ∗ ≥ 𝑍𝑍̅ which is 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅. 111.664.800 ≥
𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅. 70.000.000 , for aspiration levels of material costs may also be accepted as the value of 𝐵𝐵 ∗ ≤ 𝐵𝐵̅ is
𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅. 107.866.875 ≤ 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅. 150.000.000, and for aspiration level of the production cost can also be accepted because
of the value of 𝑃𝑃∗ ≤ 𝑃𝑃̅ is 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅. 17.980.000 ≤ 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅. 30.000.000. With all the criteria are met then the next step is to
form a fuzzy goal programming models. The following is a fuzzy goal programming models:

Goal function: Maximize 𝜆𝜆

Constraint function:
3905 𝑥𝑥1 + 3860 𝑥𝑥2 + 2125 𝑥𝑥3 + 4080 𝑥𝑥4 + 20270 𝑥𝑥5 − 50000 − (111664.8 − 70000) ≥ 70000
3895 𝑥𝑥1 + 5340𝑥𝑥2 + 2275 𝑥𝑥3 + 3170 𝑥𝑥4 + 13730 𝑥𝑥5 + (150000 − 74230)𝜆𝜆 ≤ 150000
700 𝑥𝑥1 + 800 𝑥𝑥2 + 600 𝑥𝑥3 + 750 𝑥𝑥4 + 2000 𝑥𝑥5 + (30000 − 11500) 𝜆𝜆 ≤ 30000
Production time => 24 ≤ 𝑥𝑥1 + 0.5 𝑥𝑥2 + 0.5 𝑥𝑥3 + 𝑥𝑥4 + 3.125 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 25
Inventory=>0.78 𝑥𝑥1 + 1.5 𝑥𝑥2 + 1.2 𝑥𝑥3 + 2 𝑥𝑥4 + 1.5 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 250
Materials
Glass => 𝑥𝑥1 ≤ 100
triplex 18 mm => 4 𝑥𝑥1 + 5 𝑥𝑥2 + 3 𝑥𝑥3 + 4 𝑥𝑥4 + 12 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 600
triplex 15 mm => 6 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 300
triplex 12 mm => 5 𝑥𝑥1 + 3 𝑥𝑥2 + 2 𝑥𝑥3 + 5 𝑥𝑥4 ≤ 600
triplex 9 mm => 3 𝑥𝑥4 + 8 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 300
melaminto => 12 𝑥𝑥1 + 5 𝑥𝑥4 + 35 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 600
paint => 𝑥𝑥1 + 2 𝑥𝑥4 + 20 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 300
HPL => 6 𝑥𝑥2 + 2 𝑥𝑥3 ≤ 300

Quantity of product student desk (min and max) => 0 ≤ 𝑥𝑥2 ≤ 10

Quantity of product cabinet (min and max) => 5 ≤ 𝑥𝑥2 ≤ 7
Quantity of product work table (min and max) => 0 ≤ 𝑥𝑥2 ≤ 10
Quantity of product bed divan (min and max) => 2 ≤ 𝑥𝑥2 ≤ 10
Quantity of product wardrobe (min and max) => 3 ≤ 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 8

Then simplify result becomes,

Goal function: Maximize of 𝜆𝜆

Constraint function:
3905 𝑥𝑥1 + 3860 𝑥𝑥2 + 2125 𝑥𝑥3 + 4080 𝑥𝑥4 + 20270 𝑥𝑥5 − 41664.8 𝜆𝜆 ≥ 120000
3895 𝑥𝑥1 + 5340𝑥𝑥2 + 2275 𝑥𝑥3 + 3170 𝑥𝑥4 + 13730 𝑥𝑥5 + 75770 𝜆𝜆 ≤ 150000
700 𝑥𝑥1 + 800 𝑥𝑥2 + 600 𝑥𝑥3 + 750 𝑥𝑥4 + 2000 𝑥𝑥5 + 88500 ≤ 30000
Production time => 24 ≤ 𝑥𝑥1 + 0.5 𝑥𝑥2 + 0.5 𝑥𝑥3 + 𝑥𝑥4 + 3.125 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 25
Inventory=>0.78 𝑥𝑥1 + 1.5 𝑥𝑥2 + 1.2 𝑥𝑥3 + 2 𝑥𝑥4 + 1.5 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 250
Materials
Glass => 𝑥𝑥1 ≤ 100
triplex 18 mm => 4 𝑥𝑥1 + 5 𝑥𝑥2 + 3 𝑥𝑥3 + 4 𝑥𝑥4 + 12 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 600
triplex 15 mm => 6 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 300
triplex 12 mm => 5 𝑥𝑥1 + 3 𝑥𝑥2 + 2 𝑥𝑥3 + 5 𝑥𝑥4 ≤ 600
triplex 9 mm => 3 𝑥𝑥4 + 8 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 300
melaminto => 12 𝑥𝑥1 + 5 𝑥𝑥4 + 35 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 600
paint => 𝑥𝑥1 + 2 𝑥𝑥4 + 20 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 300
HPL => 6 𝑥𝑥2 + 2 𝑥𝑥3 ≤ 300
Quantity of product student desk (min and max) => 0 ≤ 𝑥𝑥2 ≤ 10
Quantity of product cabinet (min and max) => 5 ≤ 𝑥𝑥2 ≤ 7
 Siti Komsiyah et al. / Procedia Computer Science 135 (2018) 544–552 551
8 Siti Komsiyah/ Procedia Computer Science 00 (2018) 000–000

Quantity of product work table (min and max) => 0 ≤ 𝑥𝑥2 ≤ 10

Quantity of product bed divan (min dan max) => 2 ≤ 𝑥𝑥2 ≤ 10
Quantity of product wardrobe (min dan max) => 3 ≤ 𝑥𝑥5 ≤ 8

The following are the results of calculations using fuzzy goal programming:
Student desk = 𝑥𝑥1 = 0
Cabinet = 𝑥𝑥2 = 5
Work table = 𝑥𝑥3 = 0
Bed divan = 𝑥𝑥4 = 3
Wardrobe = 𝑥𝑥5 = 6
with 𝜆𝜆 = 0.76667

Thus, the amount of production that is right and appropriate and meets the desired objective function of the
company criteria is to produce 5 pieces kabinet, 3 pieces bed divan, and 6 pieces wardrobe with the profit to be
gained is:
= 3905 𝑥𝑥1 + 3860 𝑥𝑥2 + 2125 𝑥𝑥3 + 4080 𝑥𝑥4 + 20270 𝑥𝑥5 − 50000
= 3905 ∗ 0 + 3860 ∗ 5 + 2125 ∗ 0 + 4080 ∗ 3 + 20270 ∗ 6 − 50000
= 103160 => IDR. 103.160.000,00

Material costs to be spent to produce that is:

= 3895 𝑥𝑥1 + 5340𝑥𝑥2 + 2275 𝑥𝑥3 + 3170 𝑥𝑥4 + 13730 𝑥𝑥5
= 3895 ∗ 0 + 5340 ∗ 5 + 2275 ∗ 0 + 3170 ∗ 3 + 13730 ∗ 6
= 118590 => IDR. 118.590.000,00

Production costs to be spent to produce that is:

= 700 𝑥𝑥1 + 800 𝑥𝑥2 + 600 𝑥𝑥3 + 750 𝑥𝑥4 + 2000 𝑥𝑥5
= 700 ∗ 0 + 800 ∗ 5 + 600 ∗ 0 + 750 ∗ 3 + 2000 ∗ 6
= 18250 => IDR. 18.250.000,00

The results using fuzzy goal programming, all the goal function desirable by the company are meet where the
profit exceed the profit desired by the company that is IDR. 103.160.000,00 ≥ IDR. 70.000.000,00 , material costs
incurred is not exceed the material cost desired by the company that is IDR.118.590.000,00 ≤
𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼. 150.000.000,00 , and production cost incurred is not exceed the production cost desired by the company IDR.
18.250.000,00 ≤ IDR. 30.000.000,00. If the product defect 1 or 2 pieces, the results were still meet with targets or
criteria by CV. Arte Jaya.

In the production process there must be a defective product because it can arise from a variety of factors.
Defective products will reduce the gains from company which led to the profit targets to be achieved can’t be
realized. However, by using fuzzy goal programming companies can have the possibility for the target / goal
determined by the company remains to be realized. Suppose that there are defective products on the kabinet as much
as 2 pieces. The total cost of the production process of the kabinet is the total cost of materials for the production of
kabinet + total production costs for the production of the kabinet,
Total production process to produce kabinet (2 pieces) = 2 ∗ (5340) + 2 ∗ (800)
= 12280 =>IDR. 12.280.000,00
Total profit becomes = IDR. 103.160.000,00 – IDR. 12.280.000,00
= IDR. 90.880.000,00
Total profit still exceeded the company's targets to be achieved, which is IDR. 70,000,000.00. Therefore, by using
fuzzy goal programming defective product can still be handled. Simulation program display result to input product
and display Result to Solution Result Using Fuzzy Goal Programming shown in Fig 3a and Fig 3b below :
552 Siti Komsiyah et al. / Procedia Computer Science 135 (2018) 544–552
Author name / Procedia Computer Science 00 (2018) 000–000 9

Fig 3a. Application Display to Input Products Fig 3b Application Display to Solution Result
Using Fuzzy Goal Programming

5. Conclusion

Based on the result analysis and discussion can be concluded that the fuzzy goal programming models can be
applied to CV. Arte Jaya where the level of aspiration can be adaptable to the preferences of the CV. Arte Jaya.
Furthermore, by using fuzzy goal programming, losses from defective products can still be handled where the profit
is still meet with the criteria from CV. Arte Jaya. The difference of profit from the practice in the company and FGP
model is obtained IDR 33.160.000,00 or saving about 32.14 %. And moreover the application program that has been
created is very helpful for user performance of CV. Arte Jaya in calculating using fuzzy goal programming to
determine the amount of furniture product that is exact and in accordance with the preferences of company in the
production planning model.

Acknowledgements

We thank to Bina Nusantara University was supported this research and who provided insight and expertise that
greatly assisted this paper

References

[1] Gupta, M., and Bhattacharjee, D. (2012). “ Two Weighted Fuzzy Goal Programming Methods to Solve Multiobjective Goal Programming
Problem ”. Journal of Applied Mathematics (2012)
[2] Li S., Y.Yang, C.Teng. (2004). “ Fuzzy Goal Programming With Multiple Priorities via Generalized Varying-Domain Optimization Method.
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy System ”. Journal Mathematics 12 : 597 – 605
[3] Reddy, B. C. M., Reddy, K. H., and Reddy, C. N. M. (2012), “ Production Centers Selection Problem for A Manufacturing Firm of Supply
Chain Under Production Centers’ Uncertainty and Demand Uncertainty by using Fuzzy Goal Programming Approaches “. International
Journal of Research in Mechanical Engineering & Technology 2
[4] Singh P., Kumar, S. T., Singh, R. K. (2011). “Fuzzy Goal Programming Approach to Multiobjective Linear Plus Linear Fractional
Programming Problem”. Journal of Applied Mathematics
[5] Bhargava, A.K, Singh, S.R, and Divya Bansal. (2015). “Fuzzy Goal Programming Techniques for Production Planning in Industry“.
International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research 4 (2) : 92-96
[6] Tampinongkol, F. F., Rindengan, A. J., Latumakulita, L. A. (2015) “Aplikasi Fuzzy Goal Programming (Studi Kasus: UD. Sinar Sakti
Manado)”. Jurnal Matematika 4 (2)