= *) SISON vs. PEOME 28 SRA 5e A snail goup oF Maras byslisss comerged at the Luneta fark, RS. result x, who was only tracked becouse he Has wearing a ~ Yel hich, died due * Marling given 4p Himby Are leyaliste. Severa) ——Infonmettions were Alec going jhe Idenhfied Marcas loyalists, chasging then —wsith murder of XK. cased contended thot the prologcayns were sot propesty identified , hene, the cout wns weng in admitting ake sone. 18 the contention oF +h ccused correct 7 fs G1ule, phoigrophe, when presented in evidence, must be identified byte Prolegrapher as tbls production and testified as to ite Greamsances under sotfen_ they were peduasd.. The phoiogegter, however, isnot he only wines - sho Can identify the pictures be has fokon. The conveciness oF he phofagraph con ke Proved in. prina race idence, either ky tesinony cp tte pessen utp made i echy offer competent wineses, after adich the court can admit Ht sujet impeachment as tb its accuracy. 2) PEOPLE vs. RLLEPA pap aA S04 ____% was. charged uith rape ‘or hovirg coma krowledge with Y. The sittin ane her — 1 snotner sestffied 4noh she wos.enky 9 yeas odd ot the time of the cope. ‘The ————Proseaution. did not oprer ‘the Y's_certificate_oF ive Firth or sinilan authentic _ __ documents in evidence, The court cemicted X ond sentenced tint death ___ Petause Ate viciim ws teow 7 yoars old atthe He. of the commissicn of he “efi «1S 4e_qourt correct in ansédering the YS oppeararce as ciject erence’ ehST Ne _ Jurisprudence prerves trol a pesoné appearance, where relevat} is __._____inissibe_as Bec evidence, the some being -oddte sed to te senses op the court. However, in rape cases, mature three ard o half yeor old C0 _eQsily) be mistaken or an undevdopad seven-year old. be axorded much weight onl ste testineny of the nether is, by itself, inautitiat Rs HOS pot ben estatlisned with moral certdinly ‘thot Y was below Seva NEOs _ _____0d. of the time_oF rape, X camot be senienced 40 supper the perclly ep doth. 6. YAP VS. WOMBIER IR, AN. Mis -o7-191 Cox) on the some doy , Judge 2 isaled an exter of release on the bass Fa _____casn bend pasted on March 8 , 1999 a5 shown by AN official _ceceipt,_ond in substitution, a property bad was filed on March 10. SPO2 x Aled on Odminisrotive case cosine Judge Y dleging thot tte lotler ‘Sued 4e orders alttough fhere was yet no cash bond er property pond. Thaygh his own testimony , Judge t daimed that the OR. was isaed en March 6, not March ®, A ond ___- thot # wos Ate clerk of court who changed ‘te date oF the O-R. whch hs ewtlone has the greater weight” PnsweR: __ HIS bast mie Seung fl ie documentary ond ool evidence, he _ former _catties more weight pec tie cada REET soho March 1989, 0 Sren_ty the Inthe case ot tar, Are appeqance oF the Vidim, as eect andere, canrct a ____ SPO2 X_omested Y, the ocaused in.o pending criminal case on March ©, 1999. him___epriciok_receigt the property tend in. atfvlin.op te cath bord, was fed, . fot.on March, bul. an March 10, 06 shawn. by. Ae ju Fae poh Odes OF Retase were iguied on. March 6. Therepere,, these. 15. 0 doses Anat. eaporcnt judge ordered the nuance oF the acused despre. the foct that Pere was yet ro hail filed and approved for hi provieral liberty « 4 | —X_tpank filed _a_comptains) ogpinst 7 aleging ‘ot i loored 1 sition __ 4071 eutdenced bya premissery note + In. his dnswer, Y said “hat be tos __never_ signed +e promissory role, Duing 'riol, % sayht cdmissen. of the ______ dupticate_ciginal of the preninsscry rete as it coud ne isnger found te __@Figinal_copy.Y didnot sfecifically deny the dee eecuiicn and. gensineress oF ARE document but insted, he filed a_mmbken tocismiss on tte grunt ___ thal K ne longer poscesced any. proce 06 7 alleged indepiieess. The Mo) court ordered the exduson of BALA ard F and geanted He meticn fe dismiss. bs the cost conect 7 AinsWER No. To deny ‘the genuineness and due exeaution oF ‘an actionable document, the defendant mas deciore under cath that he did not sgn. the doaument & otherwise false or fabricated. In this case., their judicial admission with, respxcl to _geniness and. eeaution Bia Of the promissory mie Sufficienty astaiaished Aheie \atoily 40% althexoh re _4he. latter failed 40 precent the. crignal oF said sete