S— gef United Nations Development Programme county: NEPAL rower bocunet Projet Tle: Community Bes Hood and Gail ake Outhurs Rik Reduction Projet People ingin sees dnerab to cate change and acters bani rm ‘UWDAF Outcomelsk improved management and are more relent fo Raarlated shes (ourcome 7 pected cP Outcomels Sere aS UNDAF Ouceme ‘expected Nepal Coney Pogmine Aen Plan (CPAP) Outpt) (output 73. Verb populnions have increased knowin about date rk management and cepodty or ‘mete change edeptation end mitigation of sts ‘utp 732. Water evel in ne Gti Lake reduced by 3 meters ondisk mitigation mesures oboped 4st Voinerobe Yor atts seating Enty/imoleienting Parmer: Department of Hydrology & Meteorloey (OHM, Minty of Scloee, Technology and Ervonment ESTE) Implarentng Entty/Responsble Parner: UNDP Pagan Pood 18-2007 Tal located resources T2084 ‘es hat + oerapor 6200000 Boece 2 OND» fay Sean | pase | ofan inspect) stent: 2" Onoe (CORN) ose eutwe 4 2asrert 2 coaNepsomor ona Nonagenem angenens 2 Ustoaaserasis nae pecmera i 2 rawoo ‘7os009 Helos a Ta Coane tance * For UNDP support GEF funded projects ahs indudes GE pn requrementsBrief Description nepal i one ofthe most deaeraffected counts athe wor and amorg the top te counties that ae Ino affected by ciate resi natrc.Neps!s ecomie and human evelopent have beer ea [ania by the coutr/s mantinor tra, nk of aca tte seu ads hgh sicepty to metrl (Grater parieuary foods, lnlces, windrtorns, haters, earthauaks fret Res, ida lake outburst ‘eds (GLO) and avalanches Cimate change i projet to increase the sevety and unpredctabiy of ‘odig and wl as lncreasethe risk of potential extstrophi lac Lake Outurst Floods (GLOF) inthe igh mounts as laces retreat ana gacil les expand. A recent report on Disaster Rik Reduction nclded that 35 chmate conge Impacts Increase, ore than 1 milion people in Nepal would become ‘neato cmatesnucea dates evry yar. The Government of Nepal cut awate of the growing Fecblemns the county faces dust eitng an itr cmertte azads Mowever, tere are umber of fey bares nat must be overcame oF suppor wil hl the GON to overcome same af he ay barr to managing the eomig iss of GLOFS Inthe High Mountains and long in he Tara and Chul Ranga of southern eal through witha song ‘emphacs on community engagement empowerment and sola Incson. A preset, hee i nsuficint Intron knomledge oe eassey to understand aed manage GLOF nts, 5 tey are iy complex, site ‘pede and fo cost: ad athe ame tie there Inks cohesion among Bernt agence to mange he ee aselsed with recuretfoocng in the Tara in crvent on gana ropemmes. The suppor wi se {the gaps anc help increase testinal nowfege and capac ofthe varous stakeholders anda ulé the ited capacity and understanding prong local camunis regarding ways o rede tet vlne?ity toGlOFsin te mounts and Soadng in Tar wil grove infornaven sharing and coerdination atthe Cental and oc! an srg the various Mints, Departments and pn-governrental acon. Under {he fe component, the projet sate fer edn GLOF vs ar om mse posing Brest toca oplatons, mater arate and tours Vistng Sagarmatha (Mount Everest) Nationa Park wil have Sear redved by reducing the lake volun teeugh an afc contalles drainage aster combined wh emmy bce ear waring sat (CBEWS] Under the second component the project tee for ‘eng onan and ater eres or recent floadng events 4 ood prone dats (anata, Soha, ptr ond Uday wl ave incresed te adap copay foc communities in eight VDC: of ‘wer bain (at, Khon, Cap) and we bute Hada anor thrush nal appropriate rural nd nonstratral messizes, induding looepreted water and sanitation sstens, 9 sediment conta Drogromme, eve bank ant dope stabizallen andthe implementation of CBEWS. Te sediment contra Programe in Rat vr, the Wt of ts ind n Nepal wil demonsvate the rial importance of marging {tear downstream lage in any twine food rk marapement programme. Troup Ms supp I “ton to senha capacty ot ay local and mations inettuions na tks ders to mane {Fan nan oats ep prone 96552 verte people wb ec Sei these inerventons ey (UNOTable of Contents Lisr or Anes 4 Lustor FicuRes| 5 stor Tasues 6 Lisror Acrowts 7 1. SITUATION ANAUSIS a 141 BRierCounrm OvenstEw 2 112 Cumare cuance-nDUcEDreooLeM 15 121. Observed Trends in Cimate-related Fooding Hazards Losses and Damages 8 122 GLOF Ris nthe High Mountains of Nepal 2 4123 Floodingin the Tarai and the Churia Range 2 124 Summary of Projections from Climate Change Models and Scenarios 2s 1.3 Lone-TERM SOLUTION AND BARRIERS To ACHIEVING THE SOLUTION 2 131 Options ond Borriers to Managing GLOF Riss in Nepal 30 132. Options nd Barriers to Managing Lowland Flading Risks # STRATEGY 38 21 PROJECT RATIONALE AND FOLIC CONFORMITY 38 22 cour ownensi 3 "224 Country eligibiliyand county drive » 222. Stakeholder Baseline Anais » 23, DEsiGn PRINCIPLES AND STRATEGIC CENSIDERATIONS 8 231 Alignmere with LDCR Results-based Management Bramework and Linkages with the LCE Adeptation Portfolio 46 232. Linkageswith Key National Policy Procescee ond natives 4 233 Linkages ich Major Recencand On-geing DRM ond Climate Chonge Programmes ond Projects st 234. Social and Gender Aspects of Disaster Risk Management in Nepal 3 235 Project Target Areas or 236 UNDP’ Comparative Advantage or 237. Expected National and Loca Benefits e 24 PacyereOnserar, Orcs, duro AND INNcArIve AcTTES 6 25. KEYINDICRTORG RISKS AND ASSUMPTIONS or 26. Corr-eeuerieness 3 227-SustaNaalury 4 28 RePucasiury 34 29 SraxenowoeR nvoLVEMENT PLAN 95 IML, PROJECT RESULTS FRAMEWORK 96 IV. TOTAL BUDGET AND WORKPLAN 108 MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS. 7 Vi. MONITORING FRAMEWORK AND EVALUATION ws ‘VIL LEGAL CONTEXT a2 Ter taremseer manatee m