! Chapter IV
wepia AND LANGUAGES. THE CASE OF NELSON GOODMAN
rd: Media as Languages?
act the attention of those who work in the field
also of interest to scholars (linguists, philoso-
munications experts, etc.). In spite of such multifarious
jon “what exactly are media?” still today remains full of
le use to us: medium is the intermediary
hus is what provides a contact between
hare really or only virtually connected. Media, there-
ction, social behaviour and communication in the
how do they involve language and the vari-
2 And in what way is a ‘mediologist’ also
0. Forew'
media repeatedly attr
The
ion. They are
of communicati
phers, mass-com
interest, the quest { exa
ning, Latin etymology is of litt
meat
re things, and U
between two or mo}
two universes, whicl
fore, are related to inter
broad sense. But, stricto sensu,
ous disciplines of communication
ascholar of language?
Essentially, people talk about
they are viewed as technologies W!
human faculty, widening its importance.
han, saw them as playing a leading role in social
authentic revolutions. The characteristic of media when considered as
ee lies in the fact that they embody their meaning or, rather,
cae They absorb the interest of their users and, if they assume a
Media-techs at most another medium that is thus integrated into the first.
ondly i nologies are not instruments of deferment but catalysts. Sec-
Meme can be considered as substitutive. It is an instrument
Which is i the attention of the user as a meaningful form (Significans)
eu to defer to its meaning (Significatum). Unlike media-
but they can, aos deferments do not contain their meaning 1 eae
‘resewanin, arious ways, represent it. To use Peirce’s term, they
Acc
medium ae toa conception that seems to combine the
Wolling the ype of technology which is capable of mo
relationship in a given culture between its pro
media in three ways. In the first sense
hhich are capable of substituting a given
The ‘discoverer’ of media, McLu-
life and as instruments of
first two senses, @
dulating and con-
ducts and the in-
181eco ot sont te
rs ton
=]
ans ever eT ay
tage eting trom But soe: OMIa the pt ME OF pe USBE. Thi noe ote
‘th th 10" the sin (tO-Ve a
Media 43Y°aleng POF sleep toi of