w

e y Fash “Old
N rit

en li

ione
c

d” P
e
e
s ub R
b
n • Infl

h
u u n der- uential
p

T le

h e d s o ciety recogn and p
‘t an . ised ow
in m erful bu
g on ch

e
i n i
e ot Fit m a inly
• Pi
t c h
ode
r n
t
e jour es stori

C
“ S m te • ‘S nalis
t s
es a
o f ro a t u nts’
bou
t clie
y , p yK
m e d ia co a nd ‘p nts t
o
r
a ri ” t y b
v erag
e.
s eud
o-ev
m m e b n s d e s
• M
a x Ma
ents
’ to
l
u Ce tio stre
tchi
c r i bes rk s gen
s
a ’: l a ng t h
he t
i s o l d f
on
ashi
, o f M arks
erag
e

n d re ruth
.
o ned o n
PR t Sparks
ha echn !
ique PR agen
s an
• P d cy
Ne

ubl
wA
ic R
• S elat
ion
ge
exp t ron s ac
ans g l tivit
PR
ion i nk b y is
• T of P etw incr
h e R a e e n eas
pra nd
ctic re is s p rom wth
gro ing
ly v
es till a o o isab
• C lack t ion f cele
onn o brit le
ect f i nfo y cu
• S ing r m ltur
ocia w i t atio e an
pro l m hn n
mo ew a bou d
tion edia ‘I sm t da
a nd n fl uen e d ia A y-to
• K m -da
now aint cers’ ND y
n la ain are soc
ck o onl ‘mi ial m
f au i n e id c roc edi
the e ntit e leb a
ntic
ity y r
and ities’
stat g
us et pai
d fo

r
(Ce
leb Pro
rity ble
• T
ma
nag ms
o co em
ent in D
nne
ct w vs p
ubl efin
• To ith
new ic re
itio
gen
era
te p
sm
edi
a
latio
ns v
s pu
n
• T ubl and blic
og ic v soc ist v
ive isib i al m s ag
bra ility e
• T n ds e f or f d ia in enc
ow ndl am fl y)
ork ess e an uen
with way dp cer
s to rom s?
me con otio
dia n?
gia nec
nts t wi
to p th c
rod ons
uce um
star ers?
s?

l work
s e a rc h socioc
u l t u r a

of Re m o re
Lack
r
w i t h calls fo
, in line c
c t i v i t y a c t o f publi s
a p motion
l i c re l ations g s o f the im
n d p ro
ub i n a
N e e d for p l u n d erstand dia practices
• a
s o c i ologic ted with me
o r s t ro nge r
i t y a s s ocia
o n t o culture
df ctiv ntribut
i
• Nee work as an a n d c o
relatio
ns
P R m orals a
n
re re s earch o
o
N e e d for m
•