Samuel Bowles argues that good citizens and moral behavior are more important for economic and policy success than good incentives alone. He believes that the common assumption that people are purely self-interested, known as "economic man," is flawed and that policies designed with this in mind may undermine ethical behavior and backfire. Drawing on new research from economics and psychology, as well as examples of both effective and failed policies, Bowles advocates for an approach that recognizes people's civic motivations and shows how incentives can support rather than weaken such motivations which good governance relies on.
Samuel Bowles argues that good citizens and moral behavior are more important for economic and policy success than good incentives alone. He believes that the common assumption that people are purely self-interested, known as "economic man," is flawed and that policies designed with this in mind may undermine ethical behavior and backfire. Drawing on new research from economics and psychology, as well as examples of both effective and failed policies, Bowles advocates for an approach that recognizes people's civic motivations and shows how incentives can support rather than weaken such motivations which good governance relies on.
Samuel Bowles argues that good citizens and moral behavior are more important for economic and policy success than good incentives alone. He believes that the common assumption that people are purely self-interested, known as "economic man," is flawed and that policies designed with this in mind may undermine ethical behavior and backfire. Drawing on new research from economics and psychology, as well as examples of both effective and failed policies, Bowles advocates for an approach that recognizes people's civic motivations and shows how incentives can support rather than weaken such motivations which good governance relies on.
Why good incentives are no substitute for good citizens
Samuel Bowles, Santa Fe Institute
Why do policies and business practices that ignore the moral and generous side of human nature often fail?
Should the idea of economic man—the amoral and
self interested Homo economicus—determine how we expect people to respond to monetary rewards, punishments and other incentives? Samuel Bowles answers with a resounding “no.” Policies that follow from this paradigm, he shows, may “crowd out” ethical and generous motives and thus backfire. Drawing on new research in economics and psychology and the experience of both failed and successful public policies, Professor Bowles advocates an alternative approach and shows how well-designed incentives can crowd in the civic motives on which good governance depends.
Samuel Bowles directs the Behavioral Sciences
Program at the Santa Fe Institute. Professor Bowles is one of the world’s leading intellectual authorities on the study of social norms, cooperation and conflict, and inequality and redistribution. He has taught economics at Harvard, the University of Massachusetts and the University of Siena and is the author of Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions, and 29 May 2018 5:00 PM Evolution and (with Herbert Gintis) A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and its Evolution. Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies Marston Road Apply for tickets here Oxford OX3 0EE