Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abigail Fricke
Mrs.Stanford
ENG124
22 August 2018
I. Thesis:
A. Although written very differently, about two very different topics, the
books, Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka and The House on Mango Street by
Sandra Cisneros, share a common theme. They both talk about how
although certain things may get in your way, some sort of change is
possible for everyone and within that change, you are always able to find
II. Analysis:
something that a lot of people did. So, throughout the book, she struggles
to find out who she is as a person and who she wants to be as a writer. Her
Esperanza’s wishes to be a writer and would rather her stay at home and
help out with their family. For example, at the beginning of the book (page
xiii), the text says, “The daughter claimed she’d been taught that a writer
needs quiet, privacy and long stretches of solitude to think. The father
decided too much college and too many gringo friends had ruined her.”
These things, along with many other obstacles, cause Esperanza’s life in
Chicago to be very confusing in the sense that she doesn’t know who to
new and shiny.” She struggles with this feeling for years on end but with
the help of her family and some of the experiences she goes through,
writer. This relates to what she said on the last page of the book, “I put it
down on paper and then the ghost does not ache so much. I write it down
and Mango says goodbye sometimes. She does not hold me with both
very short story, set sometime in the 1800s, that is all about a traveling
salesman named, Gregor Samsa. His change has to do with him one
many other changes to his life came abruptly after he woke up that
morning. In fact, they were so abrupt, Gregor didn’t think it was real. This
thought. It wasn’t a dream” (Page 5). So, additional to this obvious change
of him going from a man to a bug, his appetite, home life and the way he
example, he lost his job, stayed in his room 24/7, and had a family who
now wouldn’t even talk to him. For instance, he would always try to hear
what they were saying through his bedroom door. On page 20 it reads,
o, because of all
appropriate door and press his whole body against it.” S
those things and more, Gregor didn’t know who he was or what he wanted
his true identity to be. Unlike Esperanza, he didn’t have an outlet like
writing to release and write down how he was feeling, so he was forced to
keep it all bottled up inside. This wasn’t a good thing to do yet somehow,
Gregor managed to stay alive and do the things he could do to the best of
his ability. However, his father still unhappy with what Gregor had
become, had begun to convince his mother and sister that Gregor wasn’t
himself anymore and that he was just a burden if nothing else to them. In
fact, on page 39, he says, “You’ve got to get rid of the idea that that’s
and his own thoughts, furthered Gregor down the path of not knowing
Fricke 4
peace with what had happened but sadly, when that time came it was too
late because he died a few hours afterward. But nonetheless, his struggle
III. Discussion:
A. However, additional to the ones mentioned before, these two books still
have a lot of differences that have to do with the way that they were
written not specifically what they were written about. For example, the
language are used as ways to help Esperanza describe her friends and
her friend, Minerva, to a “house on fire” (page 84) because she is sad all
the time and in her mind, something is always wrong. Minerva, who is
similar in age to Esperanza, already has a husband and two kids of her
own. Her husband is mostly non-existent so Minerva has to raise the kids
on her own and therefore, cries all the time causing Esperanza to think
what she thinks. Another time Esperanza used figurative language in the
book, was to describe her views on the relationship between boys and
girls. She believes the two live in separate worlds and that she doesn’t
have a best friend in either one of them. She compares herself to a “red
Fricke 5
follow whatever she does, she believes that if she goes out and makes
friends with the wrong people, they will end up just like them. So for now,
from the ones used in Metamorphosis. Now, granted The House on Mango
nothing in that sense was used. Metamorphosis was written in the style,
“old English”, with very little to no figurative language in it. Basically, the
author, Franz Kafka, wrote the story so that everything he said, was
exactly what he meant. This is the exact opposite of The House on Mango
Street, where details that could be turned into metaphors or similes, were.
C. Another difference these two books have laid in things like their syntax,
diction, and tone. All three of these things, in their owns ways, are very
sentence structure is very long and put together. There weren’t many two
or three sentences. Most sentences were put together like this, “For some
reason, the tall empty room where he was forced to remain made him feel
uneasy as he lay there flat on the floor, even though he had been living in
it for five years.”(Page 18) Now, on the other hand, with The House on
Mango Street, in order to get that length of a sentence, a few shorter
back. Not a man’s house. Not a daddy’s. A house all my own. With my
D. Now, along with the sentence structure, comes diction. Diction is word
choice and with these two stories, it’s two different things. As shown in
the sentences above, The House on Mango Street uses more modern and
words like awkward or good, Gregor would say things like splendor or
perversity.
E. These words, additional to being way different than each, also have a
different effect on the tone of the stories. Although, there were sad stories
in The House on Mango Street, t he tone of the story was judgemental but
at the same time a little hopeful and wishing for the best. The use of words
and phrases like ugly, pretty and morning glories help to support that. On
tone to it. The book used more phrases and words like, prejudice,
engrossed and “there was a threat of a lethal blow to his back or his head
from the stick in his father's hand at any moment.” (Page 16) T
hings like
this really caused the whole novel to just have a very negative and
depressed tone which was quite the opposite of The House on Mango
Street.
Fricke 7
IV. Conclusion:
do still share a common theme of growth and the search for identity for the
two characters, Gregor and Esperanza. Even though they were in two
although these characters did have their change and all, I don’t necessarily
think their books were all that good or interesting. With Metamorphosis,
the storyline was absolutely terrible and although it was only 43 pages, it
still took me almost 2 months to read the entire thing. In those months
when I was reading it, half the time, I could barely even understand what I
was reading and even when I could, it’s not like the content was all that
exciting. Now, on the other hand, The House on Mango Street wasn’t all
that bad. The content and what the book was talking about, besides
Esperanza’s search for identity, was most of the time really good and
relatable. The part that I didn’t like was the storyline. You can only really
understand this if you read the book, but there just wasn’t a storyline. For
example, the author talked about a lot of things that happened throughout
Esperanza's life but they weren’t in order; it was just a jumble of stories,
here and there, with no set chronological order. I don’t think what was
being talked about was bad but I definitely think that if it were put in
better order, the effect of what the author was trying to say with all the
Fricke 8
stories would've been better. But nonetheless, these books were a part of
my project and I can’t change that now. But I can change what I read in
the future, and for that, I plan to read books probably similar to The House
Works cited
Cisneros, Sandra. The House on Mango Street. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 2015
Kafka, Franz, and Stanley Corngold. The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka. Bantam Books, 1972