algae Handbooks in Gorman Idelion is sets of comprehensive ad auhoi-
tate ede volumes on the major German deals philosophers and theres.
Underpinning the series ithe succes Passe Handbak of German Idem
(2014), eta by Mathew C. Alan, which provide an overview of the period,
is greatest pilosopher, and is ioral and philosophical importance,
Individual volunes focus on specie philosophere and major theres, fing
more dealed treatment of che many faces ofc workin metaphysis, ep
‘emology, logic, ethics, 2esthetes,poical philosophy, and several other areas,
Each volume is ee by a globally ecognized exper in the subject and con
cribuors incl toch esablished figures and younger scholars with inoraive
readings. The seis offers wide-ranging and authoritative insight into German,
Ideals, appropriate for both students and speci.
‘More information abou this serie at
xpd vwnnapringercomseries 14696
‘The Palgrave Kant Handbook
Edited by Matthew C. Altman
The Palgrave Schopenhauer Handbook
Eiced by Sandra Shapshay
The Palgrave Hegel Handbook (forthcoming)
Edited by Marina Bykova and Kenneth R. Wesxphal
The Palgrave Ficte Handbook (forthcoming)
Edited by Steven Hodes!
‘he Palgrave Handbook of German Romantic Pilephy (forthcoming)
Edited by Ezabeth Mila
The Palgrave Sebllng Handbook (forthcoming)
Edited by Sean J. MeGrath and Kyla Bruff
The Page Handbook of Tsendetal, Nev Kantian and Peleg Helio
‘The Palgrave Handoookof Crte of Ideal (forthcoming)
Alo by Matthew C. Aleman
‘ACOMPANIONTO KANT'S CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON
‘THE FRACTURED SELF IN FREUD AND GERMAN PHILOSOPHY
(coeuthored)
KANT AND APPLIED ETHICS: The Uses and Limits of Kant’ Practical
Philosophy
‘THE PALGRAVE HANDBOOK OF GERMAN IDEALISM (edited)
Sandra Shapshay
Editor
The Palgrave
Schopenhauer
Handbook
palgreve
macmillanpare Handi in German Wee
SINS aes TERNITESSINCTS. (ek)
SP tet 27
‘Bs gu hme ight Al che ely nd nas ec ty he Pr wht
a femal ence pay hi a at
Sans sn, mes on mop a Ho
“aceon in goa depen wpa hea ye
‘Sit meagre ier rb kept
‘etapa die ans oped a nes ev ms heen do
ings he aan feck tenet ch ame ae pt hom on pane
‘le wed mune de wed nonin ta
gin ew onl mr def psn Nise pl ashe
Stoner Somes ops sel pet el aed rap ce
SES bn pod ep ern he eel
re thin Og Sck Pa
“BlPapn Maa pi pled yg Mee
Rested apy en eed Ring
Speed emp an Coco 9 Cam Sard
Series Editor's Preface
“The er of German Idealism sande slongside ancient Greer and the French
Enlightenment as one ofthe most ful and influendal pesiods in the his
tory of philosophy Beginning wih the publication of Kats Critique of Pure
Reason in 1781 and ending abour ten years after Hegel's death in 1831, the
peviod of “dasied German philosophy” eansformed whole flde of phil
‘sophicalendeaver. The intlleewual energy of this movement is sil very
such alive in contemporary philosophy: the philosophers of that period
‘continue to inform our thinking and spark debates ofimeprezation,
[fer a period of neglect as 2 result of the early analyic philosopher’
rejection of idealism, interes in the Beld has grown exponentially in recent
years, Indeed, the study of German Idealism has pethaps never been more
‘actve in the English-speaking world than ic is today. Many booke appear
‘every year that offer historiallinerprecve approaches to understanding the
‘work of the German ldslis, and many others adopt and develop thes
Jnsghts and apply them co contemporary sues in epistemology, meta
physics, ethics, pelts, and aesthetics, among other fields. In addition, +
‘umber of international journal are devored to idealism as a whole and co
specific ideals philosophers, and journals in both the history of philosophy
and contemporary philosophies have regular contributions on the German
‘Weis. In numerous countries, there are regular conferences and study
sgroups run by philosophical associations thar focus on his pesiod and its
Fey figures, especidly Kane, Fiche, Scheling, Hegel, and Schopenhauer
‘As part of chis growing discussion, the volumes in the ograve Handbooks
Jn German Idealion series are designed to provide overiews ofthe major
‘guses and movements in German Idealism, with 2 bresdth and depth of2B.
sepa
9. Tan SudeaShapaay for ber helpful comments onan cbr i of
2. ateDemi
‘Ac fr aI can see, e would ot be incosinent for 2 mere pei
telieve in an ello adie God who crated senentbenge in oxder wo el
turer desoy theme As His o wanton bos are we othe godt/Tey kil af
Forhee sport (King Ler V1. 44-15), 7
“To say tat creyone wens shoes thr pinch docs not mean that ce
fels the plach ia the sume place or tothe ume degie,
fighly elle out atention to Schopenhauer secogaition ofthe Gc.“ Midh
aus temporary eel fom mal dire, boredom, and temporary
fiom boredom consiate the great part of human exence for the
forunate. The less frcnate have i even worse! (The Ride of the We
A Reconidetion of Seapenaurs Philly (Oxfords Oxford Unive
Pres, 2008), 129,
[Now thar if Schopentaue i ight, dhe Cartan string plat in
lowophy—one' immediacy known subjeciy or selt—alimarey le
tot meaphysic which relgtes that sacing-pine eo che level of mes
7
Schopenhauer's Two Metaphysics:
‘Transcendental and Transcendent
Alistair Welchman,
cape
The woud ie my representation” (WWR I, 23: SW 2:3). With this opening ine
of The World ax Repraetain, Schopenhauer postions himself squarely within
tradition of Kans transcendental idealism. This isthe docuine according
To whch the best explanation of our experience of objects is tha several en
‘specs of dat experience, including space and dime, are formal srucues
of human cognition that make experience posible! Objes of experience ae
mpitclly real bur canscendenally ideal. As 2 coolly, we possess prior
owiedge of the base spatiotemporal propets of empirical objecs because
thee formal rucares make experience ofebjecs posible inthe fist place; but
fy the same ken, we do not now whar sings ae in themselves, only as they
iprear tous, Schopenhauer Git seve ofthe metaphysical comprises the sn
These cognition a prio chat makes experience posible. This is Schopenhaue’s
toncendenal metaphysics, which he never offically abandons, but which
4s much more prominent in his eatlest work, lke the 1813 Fowfold Ror of
tbe Principle of Sufficient Reson. As he developed pilosophically however,
Schopenhauer devised a second sens ofthe metaphysical. This second sense also
pends abe nega, on canscendenal delim because ts cea cll
thatthe thing in feof should be idendied wih will—looks like precisely 2
A Wildman
Univers of Tea, San Anton, TX, USA
‘ml AliaieWelchmangucs.edu
The aha 207 9
Sh en i, ge Ha