it ie i bad! (Catlin . Je a finale “SYLLABUS. + | REMEDIAL LAW REVIEW IT SCHOOL. 2015-2016 i "PROF. HENEDINO M. BRONDIAL 1. PROVISIONALREMEDIES (Rules 57-61) iminary Attachment (R-57) rounds (S-1) quirements (S-3) r of Attaching (S-5) ischarge of Attachment (S-5,12,13) rd Party Claim (S-14) laim for damages (S-20) 1 |eim, Jr. vs. Lazaro, 700 SCRA (7/3/13) 2. Ligon vs. RTC of Makati, Br. 56, 717 SCRA (3/26/44) 3: Torres vs. Satsatin, 605 SCRA 4. s fangita vs. CA, 387 SCRA BAR . hui vs. Sandiganbayan, 349 SCRA saphacige i B. Prelinhinary Injuriction (R-58), + 1. Definition, Classes (S-1) 2, Grounds (S-3); TRO 3, Requirements (S-4) 4, Daimages (S-8) Cases: 1. ddolor vs. CA, 351.8CRA_ : i 2. Gustilo vs. Real, 353 SCI i Hi 3. Lagrosas vs. Bristo-Myers, '565 SCRA 4. Jenosa vs. Delariarte, 630 SCRA ~Fais ff 5 Solid Builders Inc. vs. China Bank, 695 SCRA, 4/3/13. 6.;Plaaa vs Lustiva, 718 SCRM, 3/5/14 7 Office of the Ombudsman vs; De Chavez, 700 $CRA. C. Réceivership (R-59) 1. When writ may issue (S-1) 2. Requirement (8-2) 3. Power of receiver (S-8) 4, Termination and Compenfton (s8) Cases: | 1. Larrobis, Jv; vs. Phil Vetertns Bank, 440 SCI | 2, Tantano ve.Espina-Cabovelde, 702 SCRAC/49/13) | 3. Koruga vs. Arceis, $90 SCRA ' | \ ii :IE. SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS (Rules 62-71) D. Replevin (R-60) “1, When writ may issue (S-1) * 2, Requirements (S-2) 3. Third Party Claim (S-7) 4, Judgment and’ Damages (S-9,10) Cases: 1, Grosa vs. CA, 329 SCRA 2, Smart Communiations vs, Astorgo, 542 SCRA 3, Hao vs. Andres, 555 SCRA 4. Navario vs. Escobido, 606 SCRA 5. Agner vs. BPI Family Savings Bank, 697 SCRA, 6/3/13 E, Support (R-61) 1, Application for Support Pendente Lite (S-1) 2-Comment, Hearing, Order (S-2,3,4) 3. Enforcement of Order (S-5) 4. Restitution (S-7) Cases: 1. De Asis vs. CA, 303 SCRA 2. People vs. Manahan, 315 SCRA * 3. Lima vs. Lint, 604 SCRA 4. Gotardo vs. Buling, 678 SCRA 5. Lim-Lua vs, Lua, 697 SCRA A Interpleader (R-62) 1, What is an action in Interpleader (S-1) 2. Requisites (S-1) 3. Procedure (S-2 to 7) Cases: 1. Wack-Wack Golf and Country Club vs. Won, 70SCRA 2. Eternal’ Gardens vs. IAC, 165 SCRA 3. Pasricha vs. Don Luis Dizon Realty, 548 SCI 4. Bank of Commerce vs. Planters Dev. Bank, 681 SCRA B. Declaratory Relief and Similar Remedies (R-63) 1. Nature; Kinds (S-1) 2. Parties (S-2) 3. Conversion into ordinary aétion (S-6) Cases: 1. Almeda vs. Bathala Marketinig Ind.,542 SCRA | i2, Republic vs. Orbecido, 472 SCRA 3. Malana vs. Tappa, 600 SCRA 4, Chaves vs. Judiciat and Bar Council, 676 SCRA . 5 Sabitsana vs. Muertegui, 703 SCRA (8/5/13) 6. Republic vs. Rogue, 706 SCRA (9/24/13) In relation to Southern Hemisphere case, 632 SCRA October 5, 2010 C, Review of Judgments and Final Orders of the COMELEC and COA eR 64) - The distinctive iiature and procedure of this special civil action Case: Alliance for Nationalism and Democracy vs. COMELEC 705 SCRA 340, September 10, 2013 D. Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus (R-65) 1. Certiorari (S-1) a. grounds b. requirements ©. procedure; parties and effects Cases: 1. Ampil vs. Ombuelsman, 703 SCRA, 7/31/13 2. ALL. Ang Network, Inc. vs. Mondejat, 714 SCRA, 1/28/14 3. Maglalang vs. PAGCOR, 712 SCRA, 12/11/13 4. People vs. Castaneda, 712 SCRA, 12/11/13 5. UP Board of Regents vs. Ligot-Teylan, 227 SCRA 8, Tuazon vs. RD of Caloocan, 157 SCRA 2. Prohibition (S-2) a. grounds b. requirements ¢. procedure; parties and effects Cases: : 1, Vivas vs. Monetary Board of BSP, 703 SCRA\8/7/13 | 2. Corales vs.\Republic, 703 SCRA, apis | | 3. Tari vs. CA, 524 SCRA | _3. Mandamus (§-3) | | a. grounds b. requisites | ©. proctdur¢y:parties and effects | | d, damages: | | Cases; i‘ 1. Hlipos, Sr. ys; Bay, 581 SCRA 3/171 2. Sanche vs.|Lastimdsa, 534 SCRA, 9/25/07 3. Social Justice Society vs. Atienza, 517 SCRA, |3/7/07 4. Fauna vj. Méniltr Eeonomic and Cultural Offide, 715 SCRA Febrisn} 4, 2014