Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mod 1
Abstract: This experiment evaluates the growth of lemna in two different tank systems. The
control tank is set to room temperature water, as the experimental tank uses heated water. This
experiment requires daily interaction, as the leman growth in tracked in grams. Lemna is an
aquatic plant that helps enhance water quality and lead to healthy water environments. Our
experiment found that the room temperature tank promoted more growth compared to the heated.
Lemna grew in both environments substantially, but the control tank saw the best growth. This
experiment can help enhance our own tanks in class to stabilize the varying water quality of our
tank systems.
(duckweed) as it attempts to grow in different water environments. For the experiment, lemna is
allowed to grow in two different environments, as the objective is to study growth in these two
areas. Lemna grows in a rapid pace as it seems to grow in many water environments, allowing it
to reproduce rapidly in many regions. For the project, we will evaluate how heated and room
temperature water impact the growth of lemna. For the experiment, I predict that room
temperature water will be better to create a stable and healthy environment for lemna to grow
rapidly. Lemna is one of the smallest flowering plants on Earth, as it rapidly grows in nearly any
water environment. Even though it lacks stems, leaves, and roots, lemna is one of the most
abundant flowering aquatic plants in many water environments. Lemna reproduces asexually,
throw a process known as budding. A normal reproduction cycle has one single lemna produce a
duplicate each day, accelerating the rapid way of reproduction. Lemna is high in protein for
fishes, especially tilapias, as the plant can enhance any water system. Lemna can also enhance
water quality in pod systems, as it acts as a stabilizer for harmful substances created by the fish
Materials and Methods: For the experiment, several items were required to evaluate and record
lemna growth. First two small fish tank systems were created and filled with water to allow for
the experiment to begin. Once the tanks were filled with water and stabilized, a heater was
installed in one creating the experimental tank, while the other was left alone to be a control. The
heater was put on a timer, as the heater stayed on a few hours each day to test lemna growth. A
small strainer was used to collect lemna each day to evaluate growth, as it was weighed on a
scale each day. The data was recorded in pen in our logbooks, as the data was evaluated on Excel
of leman growth. Once the tanks were filled with water, the lemna seeds were inserted into the
systems to begin growth. A timer was attached to the heater in the experimental tank, as it only
activated a few times each day. Each day a small strainer collected as much as leman as possible
to be weighed on a scale. The weight was evaluated to see how much growth had been
accomplished in the one day timeframe. The experiment was repeated for many days, even with
many of the original leman seeds dying after several days of growth in each tank.
Results: After completing this experiment, the lemna in the room temperature control tank had
the best growth. Each tank allowed leman to grow, but the room temperature tank created the
healthiest environment. From the observations in the control tank, we clearly observed much
more leman growth as the plants greatly outnumbered the experimental tank. Additionally, the
average biomass in the control tank was greater than the heated tank, by about 10 grams of
additional biomass.
Data Tables:
Calculations: With the copious amounts of data, there were many pieces of data that were
utilized to statistically compare growth between the heated and unheated tank systems. For the
control tank, the average biomass in grams sat around 105.1g. For the heated tank, the average
biomass was around 94.8g. For the control tank, the standard deviation was about 6.3 while the
heated standard deviation was about 3.6. After completing the T-Test, the difference between the
data sets came to about 10.8, which correlates to less than .1% difference.
103 100
Paired T-test 110 99.1
t= m 97 91
s /√n 99 94.5
m= mean both mean and deviation 103.5 98
s= standard deviation are from the diffrences in 116.5 93.5
n= size of data each pair of the two sets of 108 89.5
data 103.5 93
avg 105.0625 94.825
m= 10.2375 std dev 6.264626 3.593658
s= 2.67096813664352 amount 8 8
n= 8
t= 10.2375
0.944329841
Graphs:
140
Control Tank vs Emperimental Tank Biomass
120
100
BIOMASS (G)
80
60
40
20
0
DAY NUMBER 1 2 4 7 8 9 10 11
Biomass (Control) 103 110 97 99 103.5 116.5 108 103.5
Temp (Control) 19.2 17.5 17.7 16.1 15.8 17.1 18.1 18.5
Biomass (Experimental) 100 99.1 91 94.5 98 93.5 89.5 93
Temp (Experimental) 25.7 26.6 26.1 23.1 25.7 26.3 26.1 26.8
Discussion: After completing this experiment my prediction was accurate, as the control tank
promoted better growth compared to the heated tank. Lemna grows in almost any water
environment and was true in both tank systems. However, the tank system that only utilized
room temperature water had the best growth. The heated experimental tank allowed for growth
to occur, but the average biomass was over 10 grams less compared to the control tank. The T-
Test provided the differential between the data sets had a miniscule significance, showing that
the experimental difference is influenced by outside environmental factors. After completing the
experiment, several examples of error could impact data collection and analysis. The collection
of lemna may have not been extremely thorough, allowing traceable amounts to be left in the
tanks causing mass measurements to be inaccurate. Additionally, when collecting and analyzing
data, calculations and roundings may have been done incorrectly creating skewed results. To
improve the experiment, the next testers may set up another tank system and try chilling the
Conclusion: After completing this experiment with lemna, I have a better understanding of how
this aquatic plant grows so rapidly and the environments it can do so. The lemna we planted in
the room temperature control tank and grew greater amounts comparted to the heated tank. The
experiment helped us experiment with lemna growth and see the rapid nature of its reproduction.
Lemna can grow nearly everywhere, but it’s important to find its most stable environment. From
completing this experiment, we can better utilize lemna in our large-scale tank systems to
enhance water quality. The tilapia tank systems would benefit most from additionally ways to
enhance water quality. Lemna is a complex and easy to study aquatic plant, and the research
gathered from this experiment can help enhance any of our numerous tank systems in our class.
References: