The Indonesian Business Competition Supervisory Commission found that PT Garuda Indonesia violated anti-monopoly laws by giving an exclusive dual access agreement to PT Abacus Indonesia and requiring travel agents to use Abacus's system. The Commission fined PT Garuda Indonesia 1 billion rupiah and ordered them to cancel the exclusive agreement with Abacus and remove the Abacus connection requirement for travel agents. The case was brought by an unnamed company complaining about PT Garuda Indonesia influencing agents and forcing them to rent computers from PT Abacus Indonesia.
The Indonesian Business Competition Supervisory Commission found that PT Garuda Indonesia violated anti-monopoly laws by giving an exclusive dual access agreement to PT Abacus Indonesia and requiring travel agents to use Abacus's system. The Commission fined PT Garuda Indonesia 1 billion rupiah and ordered them to cancel the exclusive agreement with Abacus and remove the Abacus connection requirement for travel agents. The case was brought by an unnamed company complaining about PT Garuda Indonesia influencing agents and forcing them to rent computers from PT Abacus Indonesia.
The Indonesian Business Competition Supervisory Commission found that PT Garuda Indonesia violated anti-monopoly laws by giving an exclusive dual access agreement to PT Abacus Indonesia and requiring travel agents to use Abacus's system. The Commission fined PT Garuda Indonesia 1 billion rupiah and ordered them to cancel the exclusive agreement with Abacus and remove the Abacus connection requirement for travel agents. The case was brought by an unnamed company complaining about PT Garuda Indonesia influencing agents and forcing them to rent computers from PT Abacus Indonesia.