Imaging of Blunt Abdominal Trauma
A. Luana Stanescu, MD, Joel A. Gross, MD, Michelle Bittle, MD, and F.A. Mann, MD
I solated blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) represents about
5% of annual trauma mortality from blunt trauma. As part
of multiple-site injury (polytrauma), BAT contributes an-
other 15% of trauma mortality.1 Exsanguination accounts for
80 to 90% of acute deaths from abdominal injury. More than
75% of such cases are amenable to surgery, and recent years
have seen safe extension of nonoperative, image-guided
treatments to most victims of blunt-force trauma.2-21 Early
recognition and treatment decisions have been greatly im-
pacted by increasingly sophisticated cross-sectional imaging
and image-guided, minimally invasive therapies.22-32
Blunt Disruptions
of the Diaphragm,
Abdominal Wall, and Flank
The diagnosis of diaphragm rupture is often missed. A high
index of suspicion for diaphragmatic ruptures is warranted in
appropriate clinical circumstances, such as lateral impact ve-
hicle crashes, especially when left-sided, and direct frontal
impacts. Classical findings are present in less than 40% of
left-sided and less than 15% of right-sided diaphragm rup-
tures.33-37 Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) is falsely nega-
tive in 10 to 15% of cases.37-41
Delayed diagnoses are not uncommon: 10 to 15% of cases
present with more than 24 hours delay,33,35,37,42 especially if
the commonly associated intrathoracic (⬃90%) and intraab-
dominal (⬃60%) injuries require endotracheal intubation
and positive-pressure ventilation.37,43 It is believed that the
positive intrathoracic pressure prevents or limits herniation
of abdominal contents through the diaphragm. New, unilat-
eral “elevation” of hemidiaphragm following extubation may
represent herniation of abdominal contents through a previ-
ously unrecognized diaphragm rupture.
Conventional radiography (chest radiographs with enteral
tube placement; fluoroscopy) is abnormal in 60 to 90% of
acute traumatic diaphragmatic ruptures, but most findings
are nonspecific and cannot be distinguished from hemotho-
Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washing-
ton.
Address reprint requests to F.A. Mann, MD, 325 Ninth Ave., Box 359728,
Seattle, WA 98104-2499. E-mail: famann@u.washington.edu
196 0037-198X/06/$-see front matter © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1053/j.ro.2006.05.002
rax, atelectasis, etc. Sensitivity is 46% in detecting left-sided
diaphragm ruptures and only 17% for right-sided ruptures.44
There are two classical chest radiographic findings described
for diaphragmatic rupture: intrathoracical herniation of a
hollow viscus, with or without a collar sign (narrowed waist
of a herniated intraabdominal organ due to compression as it
squeezes through the diaphragmatic rupture), and detection
of a nasogastric tube above the left hemidiaphragm.45
In case series reports, diagnostic accuracy of computed
tomography (CT) was equivalent, but not clearly superior, to
conventional radiographic techniques.46 Thin-cut CT with
multiplanar reformations is expected to improve sensitiv-
ity.47 At CT, the so-called “dependent viscera” sign (intraab-
dominal contents abutting the posterior thoracic wall, espe-
cially where the scan level is in the upper third of the liver or
spleen) and the “collar” sign are nearly 100% specific. Other
findings, such as the “discontinuous” and thickened dia-
phragm signs, show intermediate sensitivity and specificity
(40 to 75%).46,48 Among reported series in which magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) depicted no diaphragmatic disrup-
tions, no delayed diagnoses have been reported.49-51
Injuries to the muscles and fascia surrounding the perito-
neum may result in three types of injuries: the most common
are type I, small defects, usually located in the lower abdom-
inal wall secondary to bicycle handlebar blunt trauma. Type
II includes larger abdominal wall defects after high-energy
injuries like motor vehicle accident (MVA) or a fall from
height, while type III are associated with intraabdominal her-
niations in the retroperitoneum following deceleration inju-
ries.52 Contained hematomas also occur and do not typically
require intervention, but may require embolization for ex-
panding hematomas.53-55 High-energy abdominal wall her-
nias, open or closed, almost always require surgical interven-
tion.56-62
Injuries to the Solid
Intraperitoneal Organs
Hemodynamic instability and evidence of on-going blood
loss are the strongest indicators for the need of intervention
in spleen and liver injuries.8,24,63 Among hemodynamically
unstable patients that are not taken immediately to the oper-
ating suite, focused abdominal sonography for trauma
(FAST) and DPL are diagnostically equivalent in detecting
Imaging of blunt abdominal trauma 197

Figure 1 A 42-year-old female sustained a grade IV liver laceration in a fall from a building. (A) Contrast-enhanced axial
CT scan through the liver at the level of portal vein shows deep lacerations involving the dome of the liver and extending
to the portal veins and IVC. (B) Contrast-enhanced axial CT scan shows small thrombus in IVC (arrow) and perihepatic
hematoma. No evidence of active vascular extravasation.

surgically important intraperitoneal hemorrhage due to solid
organ injury(ie, selecting patients in whom laparotomy is
therapeutic).64
Among hemodynamically stable patients, adjunctive diag-
nostic tests and serial physical examinations support nonop-
erative management.65-72 CT shows sensitivity in the mid to
high 90% in the detection of surgically important injuries of
the liver (Fig. 1) and spleen (Fig. 2).73,74
Although useful for epidemiologic studies, CT grading of
liver and spleen injuries based on morphology of wounds
does not reliably predict the specific outcome in individual
cases.66,75-77 On the other hand, active hemorrhage shown by
CT (Fig. 3) commonly leads to endovascular or surgical in-
terventions whether bleeding is “focal ”(intraparenchymal:
pseudoaneurysms versus arteriovenous fistula), “diffuse”
(free-flowing intraperitoneal fluid), or multifocal (most com-
monly seen in pelvic retroperitoneum in patients sustaining
pelvic ring disruptions).10,78-84
Extravasated contrast appears as relatively discrete con-
trast collections that increase or “pool” on delayed imaging
and measures within 10 to 20 HU of density of an adjacent
major artery or aorta, during the vascular phase of imaging.
With current generation CT scanners, contrast-en-
hanced CT does not reliably distinguish between pseudo-
aneurysm (⬎70% believed to progress to rupture in
adults) and AV fistula (natural history is uncertain).28,84-86
Parenchymal vascular lesions more often resolve sponta-
neously in children, and expectant observation may be

Figure 2 A 60-year-old male status post fall from ladder. (A, B) Contrast-enhanced CT scan through the dome of the
liver (A) and at the level of splenic vein (B) demonstrates extensive lacerations of spleen. Fluid is present around both
the liver and the spleen, but the fluid around the spleen is denser, indicating sentinel clot (arrow). More than 1 liter of
hemoperitoneum was found at surgery.
198
Figure 3 A 43-year-old male status post motor vehicle crash (MVC).
Contrast-enhanced axial CT scan through liver and spleen shows
anterior splenic laceration with active extravasation (long arrow).
Contrast extends into lateral perisplenic hematoma (short arrow).
Two liters of hemoperitoneum was present at surgery.
preferable to urgent intervention.87 Notably, larger pro-
portions of blunt trauma patients show extravasation
when multidetector CT is used with higher injection rates
(⬎2.5 ml/s) of intravenous contrast and scanning in early
to mid portal venous phases.74,84,88-92
Patients in whom CT detects multiorgan “package” inju-
ries (eg, spleen and left kidney; left lobe of the liver; and
pancreas) are more likely to undergo surgical intervention.93
In addition, liver lacerations that involve the hilum, particu-
larly those associated with partial avulsion of the gall bladder,
may benefit from repeated CT scanning or ultrasound,
cholescintigraphy, or direct cholangiography to detect possi-
ble biliary complications (Fig. 4).94-99
Liver lacerations involving the hepatic veins, especially
when associated with large regions (⬎10 cm) of focal hy-
poperfusion, are associated with injuries to the retrohe-
patic vena cava that commonly require intervention
(Fig. 5).92,100,101
During postinjury monitoring, serial CT scans do not ap-
pear to be useful in altering therapy or determining the time
for return to full activities for patients without increasing
abdominal pain, falling hematocrit, or clinical features of in-
traabdominal sepsis.102,103 Nonetheless, if serial follow-up
imaging is believed to be indicated in specific cases, ultra-
sound is a more cost-effective alternative than CT.104
Blunt Injuries to Retroperitoneum:
Duodenum and Pancreas,
Adrenals; Kidneys and
Ureters; and Great Vessels
Retroperitoneal injuries are sometimes suspected based on
clinical history, physical examination findings, and labora-
tory tests (eg, microscopic hematuria),105 but often are oc-
A.L. Stanescu et al
cult. CT is the diagnostic procedure of choice, as neither
FAST nor DPL adequately assess the retroperitoneum.106
Conventional radiographic procedures (upper gastrointesti-
nal positive-contrast fluoroscopy, intravenous, or retrograde
pyelography) may be helpful in secondary or follow-up eval-
uations of individuals known to have sustained injuries to the
duodenum and upper urinary tracts, respectively.107-110
In adults, the duodenum and pancreas are rarely injured in
isolation.111,112 However, children and adolescents may sus-
tain isolated duodenal, or duodenal and pancreatic injuries,
especially from bicycle handlebar goring mechanisms
(Fig. 6).113
Pancreatic injuries range from contusions to lacerations,
fractures, and duodenal-pancreatic disjunctions.114 The ma-
jority (⬎50%) of pancreatic injuries are contusions, hemato-
mas, or superficial capsular lacerations. An additional 20 to
25% represent deeper pancreatic parenchymal lacerations
without involvement of a major pancreatic duct.115 Injuries
to the main pancreatic duct and combined pancreatico-duo-
denal injuries necessitate intervention and are often associ-
ated with complicated treatment courses.114,116-119
Compared with its performance at detecting acute injuries
to intraperitoneal solid organs, CT is relatively insensitive to
acute pancreatic injuries, even to severe injuries completely
disrupting the main pancreatic duct or pancreatico-duodenal
junction.120-123 Direct signs include a fracture plane travers-
ing the neck, body, or tail of the pancreas, or separation of the
duodenum from the head of the pancreas. Indirect findings
on intravenous contrast-enhanced CT include heterogeneous
enhancement or focal enlargement of the pancreatic paren-
chyma and fluid around the pancreas, especially posteriorly,
where it may separate the pancreas from the splenic
vein.94,120,124,125 Definitive diagnosis and staging of main pan-
creatic duct injuries require either intraoperative, endo-
scopic, or MR cholangio-pancreatography.116,120,126,127
The range of duodenal injuries includes contusion, mural
hematoma, and lacerations (partial versus through-and-
through).118,124,128-131 CT depiction of retroperitoneal fluid
adjacent to the duodenum, especially when seen in conjunc-
tion with retroperitoneal gas, suggests duodenal injury.130,132
Intravenous contrast-enhanced CT may also demonstrate
asymmetric mural enhancement, and duodenal hema-
toma.130,133 Where intravenous contrast extravasation is
shown, delayed images (5 to 30 minutes) facilitate distinction
between medical and surgical bleeding (increased “pooling”
of contrast on delayed images) and may facilitate the decision
of whether and how to intervene.130,134 Oral contrast may be
helpful in delineating both pancreatic and duodenal pathol-
ogy. While controversy exists as to whether positive or neg-
ative alimentary (eg, water) contrast provides more diagnos-
tic information,128,135-139 we favor water orally or per enteral
tube. Although extraluminal positive enteral contrast can
make a specific diagnosis of bowel rupture by CT, it is rare
that this would be the only finding leading to surgical explo-
ration, and positive contrast limits evaluation of wall and
mucosal abnormalities (such as absent perfusion, which is
better visualized with negative contrast agents).
Renal parenchymal injuries (Fig. 7), whether isolated or
Imaging of blunt abdominal trauma 199

Figure 4 A 7-year-old girl in high-speed MVC, front unrestrained

passenger. (A) Initial contrast-enhanced axial CT scan shows deep
liver lacerations extending to portal vein, porta hepatis, and gall-
bladder fossa. Spleen is poorly perfused, which can be a sign of
hypovolemia. Large hemoperitoneum is present. (B) Initial contrast-
enhanced axial CT scan shows that anterior gallbladder wall does
not enhance (arrows). (C) Follow-up contrast-enhanced axial CT
scan obtained 16 days later shows large biloma along inferior sur-
face of left lobe of liver.

combined with retro- and intraperitoneal injuries, are more
common than duodenal or pancreatic injuries.140-142 Inter-
ventions are more often required when the collecting systems
or ureters are injured, and when renal injuries are combined
with pancreatic or bowel injuries.142 Even when FAST or DPL
are “negative,” contrast-enhanced CT is indicated for gross
hematuria (all age groups); children (⬍15 years old) with
high levels of microscopic hematuria (⬎50 red blood cells
per high-powered field, or 3⫹ or greater on urine dipstick),
regardless of their hemodynamic status; and adults with he-

Figure 5 A 69-year-old female status post MVC. (A) Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan at the level of the pancreas shows
active vascular extravasation (arrow) in the region of the portal triad. (B) Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan shows
intraperitoneal accumulation of extravasated contrast inferiorly.
200
Figure 6 A 11-year-old male with bicycle handlebar trauma to upper
abdomen. IV contrast-enhanced axial CT scan at the level of second
and third portions of duodenum shows retroperitoneal periduode-
nal hemorrhage with focal bowel thickening and discontinuity at
the junction of 2nd and 3rd portions of duodenum (arrow).
A.L. Stanescu et al
maturia (1⫹ or greater on urine dipstick, or ⬎50⫹ red blood
cells per high-powered field) who have any documented sys-
tolic hypotension (⬍90 mm Hg).140,143-148
Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT ideally shows clinically
important renal vascular (vascular pedicle injuries including
dissection, thrombosis, pseudoaneurysms, and AV fistulae),
parenchymal (parenchymal lacerations), and collecting sys-
tem injuries.109,142,149,150 When low- or iso-osmolar intrave-
nous contrast agents are employed, imaging during late pa-
renchymal phase and after a 5- to 10-minute delay detects the
presence of virtually all important upper urinary tract inju-
ries.151 Repeated CT scanning 24 to 72 hours after trauma
aids in detection of complications among patients with high-
grade renal injuries.152
Indirect intravenous contrast-enhanced CT findings of
upper urinary tract injury include perinephric stranding
and hematoma, and heterogenous parenchymal enhance-
ment.153-156 Medial perinephric hematomas, especially
when large and extending into the root of the mesentery,
are associated with renal venous and uretero-pelvic junc-
tion (UPJ) injuries.144 Otherwise, the location and size of
perinephric hematoma poorly correlates with the severity
Figure 7 A 29-year-old male status post MVC. (A) Axial contrast-
enhanced CT scan in the interpolar region of right kidney shows
deep lacerations. (B) Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan at the level of
right upper pole shows active vascular extravasation (arrow). (C)
Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan delayed images show diffusion
and dilution of extravasated contrast within perinephric hematoma
at the same level as (A). Angiography demonstrated arterial extrav-
asation, which was successfully embolized.
Imaging of blunt abdominal trauma
of parenchymal injury or the need to intervene. However,
large subcapsular hematomas can be associated with sub-
sequent hypertension (Page kidney).157
Direct intravenous contrast-enhanced CT findings of renal
injury include parenchymal lacerations and vascular and/or
urinary extravasations; the latter two necessitate intervention
or follow-up imaging.144,156,158 The frequency, timing, and
optimal methods for follow-up examination remain subjects
of debate. Our practice is to perform a portal venous phase of
the abdomen and pelvis, followed by 10-minute delayed im-
ages in patients with renal injuries or where unexplained
fluid is found adjacent to the kidney, ureter, or bladder.
Bladder ruptures may be intra- or extraperitoneal, or a
combination.159-163 Almost all extraperitoneal bladder rup-
tures (Fig. 8) are associated with high-energy osseous disrup-
tions of the pelvic ring.162,164 Classical CT patterns of extra-
peritoneal extravasation are “molar tooth” configuration of
contrast extravasation in the prevesical space (Fig. 8A); ab-
dominal wall extension of the contrast (Fig. 8B); or, in cases
with serious fascial plane disruptions, extension to scrotum,
and/or thigh (Fig. 8C).
201
Figure 8 (A) A 40-year-old male status post three-story fall. Axial CT
cystogram scan at the level of acetabular roof shows “molar tooth”
configuration of contrast extravasation into the prevesical space. (B)
A 45-year-old male involved in a motorcycle accident (MCA). Axial
CT cystogram scan at the level of pubic symphysis shows anterior
bladder wall rupture with a large amount of contrast and small
amount of air extending to the abdominal wall. (C) A 45-year-old
male in MCA. Axial CT cystogram scan at the level of upper thighs
shows contrast extending into scrotum, outlining testicles, and to
fascial planes of the left leg.
Although most intraperitoneal ruptures are also associated
with high-energy osseous disruptions of the pelvis or acetab-
ulum, an over-distended bladder rising out of the true pelvis
may rupture from direct blunt-force impact without pelvic
fracture.164 Contrast extravasation can be detected in para-
colic gutters (Fig. 9A), inferior peritoneal recesses (rectoves-
ical/rectouterine, vesicouterine) (Fig. 9B), or surrounding the
liver edge (Fig. 9C).
With combined intra- and extraperitoneal bladder rup-
ture, if one component is large and the other is small, contrast
may exit only through the larger defect, leaving the other
component undiscovered.
Hematuria associated with high-energy pelvic ring disrup-
tions, especially if perivesical hematoma or bladder wall
thickening is present, warrants positive-contrast cystogra-
phy, which should not be considered adequate to exclude
injury unless intravesical pressure reaches at least 40
cmH2O.162,163,165 Delayed images of the pelvis, with passive
filling of the bladder by renal excretion of contrast, are not
adequate to evaluate for bladder injury, as the extent of blad-
der filling and intravesical pressure cannot be controlled.
202 A.L. Stanescu et al

Figure 9 (A) A 25-year-old female in car versus pedestrian accident.

Axial CT cystogram scan at the level of L2-L3 shows intraperitoneal
contrast in right paracolic gutter and around small bowel loops. (B)
A 33-year-old male in MCA. Axial CT cystogram scan at the level of
acetabular roof identifies intraperitoneal contrast in rectovesical re-
cess (long arrow) and the right and left anterolateral inferior perito-
neal recesses (short arrow). (C) A 51-year-old male post forklift
injury to the pelvis. Axial abdominal CT scan at the level of Mori-
son’s pouch following CT cystogram shows intraperitoneal contrast
surrounding the liver edge.

With the advent of CT, adrenal injuries are now recog-

nized as the most common retroperitoneal injury.166,167
The right adrenal is injured much more often than the left,
and bilateral adrenal hemorrhage is relatively rare.167,168
An association also exists between right adrenal hemor-
rhage and liver lacerations involving the bare area.169 De-
spite their frequency, adrenal hemorrhages very rarely re-
quire treatment. Embolization may be done for large,
active extravasations associated with ongoing hemody-
namic consequences.170,171
Adrenocortical replacement therapy may be needed for
hypoadrenalism, a very infrequent consequence of bilateral
adrenal hemorrhage.172
CT findings of adrenal injuries (Fig. 10) typically dem-
onstrate irregular, globular enlargement of the gland, typ-
ically measuring 40 to 70 HU.173 However, definite dis-
tinction from preexisting nontraumatic adrenal path-
ology may require targeted follow-up CT, ultrasound, or Figure 10 A 63-year-old male in MCA. Axial IV enhanced CT chest
MRI.174 scan shows new, bilateral adrenal hemorrhage.
Imaging of blunt abdominal trauma
Blunt Injuries to
Hollow Intraperitoneal
Abdominal Viscera
The small bowel sustains surgically important blunt injury
more frequently than the colon.175 The spectrum of bowel
injuries includes wall contusions, serosal injuries (“desero-
salization”), perforations and transections, mesenteric rents,
and hematomas.176,177 When mural disruption occurs in the
proximal gastrointestinal tract (stomach through proximal
jejunum), leakage of alimentary tract contents into the peri-
toneum induces acute chemical peritonitis and related clini-
cal findings.178 Distal small bowel and colon spillage tend to
present later as peritoneal sepsis.177 Delays in diagnosis of
bowel injury are associated with complicated clinical courses
and increased mortality.179,180 Serial physical evaluation of
the abdomen alone (ie, without adjunctive diagnostic tests,
such as CT, ultrasound or US, DPL) may be associated with
⬎24-hour delay in diagnosis of surgically important bowel
injuries in 10 to 15% of individuals with distracting injuries,
such as femur fractures.181 DPL remains a somewhat more
sensitive test than CT for isolated hollow viscus injury, even
with intravenous and alimentary contrast enhancement,
thin-sections, and multidetector technologies.180,182,183 How-
ever, less than 1% of surgically important blunt-force hollow
visceral injuries occurring in adults are found in the absence
of other, often more obvious and clinically immediate, intra-
abdominal injuries.176 Conventional radiography, ultra-
sound, and MRI have little or no role in the routine diagnosis
of bowel injuries.184
CT performed without oral or intravenous contrast en-
hancement may show intramural hematoma as focal, asym-
metric hyperdensity within bowel wall with adjacent mesen-
teric edema (“misty mesentery”).128,185 Bowel contusion may
be suggested on intravenous contrast-enhanced CT by focal
(Fig. 11) or multifocal (Fig. 12) bowel thickening and mural
Figure 11 A 38-year-old restrained driver, lapbelt only, in high-
speed MVC. Axial contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scan at the level
of mid-abdomen shows focal thickening of jejunum in left abdo-
men.
203
Figure 12 A 10-year-old girl involved in high-speed MVC, seat belt
sign. Contrast-enhanced axial abdominal CT scan at the level of
mid-abdomen (inferior pole of right kidney) shows free intraperito-
neal fluid with multiple focal thickening in the jejunum and cecum.
enhancement. Oral contrast (positive or negative) may help
in appreciation of intramural hematomas.186,187
In contrast, diffuse bowel wall thickening and enhance-
ment (Fig. 13), especially associated with slit-like infrahe-
patic inferior vena cava and hypodense and contracted
spleen, suggests under-resuscitation and the so-called hypo-
perfusion or shock bowel syndrome.188-190 Spillage of posi-
tive alimentary contrast or contents and free intraabdominal
gas are diagnostic of bowel perforation.132,191-194
While use of oral positive contrast appears to be
safe,138,195,196 its use does not seem to be diagnostically essen-
tial and may delay imaging in acutely ill patients.135,136 The
combination of triangular interloop collections within the
mesentery and abnormal-appearing bowel wall strongly sug-
gests transmural bowel injury (Fig. 14).133
Likewise, nonphysiologic amounts of free intraperitoneal
fluid (⬎75 mL in minimally resuscitated women of child-
Figure 13 A 23-year-old female, high-speed motorcycle crash. Axial
contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scan at the level of renal hilum
shows diffuse bowel thickening consistent with shock bowel, he-
moperitoneum, and slit-like IVC; also noted is injury to right renal
hilum.
204
Figure 14 A 54-year-old in MVC crash. Axial contrast-enhanced ab-
dominal CT scan at the level of lower abdomen shows abnormal
thickening of the jejunum with triangular-shaped areas of mesen-
teric and interloop fluid (arrow).
bearing age, ⬎25 mL in minimally resuscitated adult males,
and ⬎25 mL in children) without evidence for intraperito-
neal solid organ injury suggests occult hollow viscus injury
and should lead to additional diagnostic testing or serial ex-
aminations.179,197,198
Acute abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), a poten-
tially treatable and often fatal complication of trauma, is a
manifestation of shock-related capillary leak and is not un-
common among severely injured patients who have received
vigorous fluid resuscitation.199 Although ACS may be seen in
the absence of significant intraabdominal injury, hemody-
namically significant major intraabdominal trauma is a com-
mon antecedent. Findings at intravenous contrast-enhanced
CT include slit-like infrahepatic vena cava, marked diffuse
edema and dense mural/mucosal staining of the bowel, flat-
tening of the kidneys, expansion of the intraperitoneal space
(circular cross-section of the abdomen at the level of the renal
veins, elevation of the diaphragms that may invert to efface
the left and right cardiac ventricles, distension of the com-
mon femoral veins, and bilateral inguinal “hernias”).200-203
Injuries to the
Abdominal Aorta and Its Main
Tributaries, and the Vena Cava
Traumatic disruption of the midline great vessels is rare. Both
clinically and at imaging, the presence of a midline hema-
toma surrounding the aorta and infrahepatic vena cava war-
rants careful attention. Aortic injuries are commonly associ-
ated with lapbelt injuries (thoracolumbar spine distraction
injuries) and may present with an acute aortic syn-
drome.204-207 Infrahepatic vena cava injuries are suggested by
surrounding pericaval or juxtacaval hematoma, contour ir-
regularity, and indistinct contrast interface with irregular lu-
men margins or contrast-extravasation on contrast-enhanced
CT.208,209
A.L. Stanescu et al
Conclusions
Imaging modalities of choice in evaluating blunt trauma pa-
tients are CT and FAST. Intravenously contrast-enhanced CT
remains the most common and efficacious means of correctly
categorizing patients into those likely manageable with non-
operative techniques and those who need surgery. The in-
creasing tendency of nonoperative management requires
early identification of the lesions, which is provided by the
increasing sophistication of the CT techniques. CT also pro-
vides a very important tool in following up the patients and
detecting complications not initially diagnosed.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr Lee B. Talner for proofreading the manuscript
and Dr Harigovinda R. Challa for case contributions.
References
1. Anderson RN MA, Fingerhut LA, Warner M, et al: Deaths: Injuries,
2001. In: National Vital Statistics Reports. Hyattsville, MD: CDC,
2004, p 88
2. Gilroy D: Deaths from blunt trauma, after arrival at hospital: plus ca
change, plus c’est la meme chose. Injury 36:47-50, 2005
3. Beck D, Marley R, Salvator A, et al: Prospective study of the clinical
predictors of a positive abdominal computed tomography in blunt
trauma patients. J Trauma 57:296-300, 2004
4. Eubanks JW 3rd, Meier DE, Hicks BA, et al: Significance of ‘blush’ on
computed tomography scan in children with liver injury. J Pediatr
Surg 38:363-366; discussion 363-366, 2003
5. Santaniello JM, Miller PR, Croce MA, et al: Blunt aortic injury with
concomitant intra-abdominal solid organ injury: treatment priorities
revisited. J Trauma 53:442-445; discussion 445, 2002
6. Aseervatham R, Muller M: Blunt trauma to the spleen. Aust NZ J Surg
70:333-337, 2000
7. Maxwell RA, Fabian TC, Croce MA, et al: Secondary abdominal com-
partment syndrome: an underappreciated manifestation of severe
hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma 47:995-999, 1999
8. Wasvary H, Howells G, Villalba M, et al: Nonoperative management of
adult blunt splenic trauma: a 15-year experience. Am Surg 63:694-
699, 1997
9. Krige JE, Bornman PC, Terblanche J: Liver trauma in 446 patients. S
Afr J Surg 35:10-15, 1997
10. DiGiacomo JC, McGonigal MD, Haskal ZJ, et al: Arterial bleeding
diagnosed by CT in hemodynamically stable victims of blunt trauma.
J Trauma 40:249-252, 1996
11. Pachter HL, Hofstetter SR: The current status of nonoperative man-
agement of adult blunt hepatic injuries. Am J Surg 169:442-454, 1995
12. Nghiem HV, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mindelzun RE: CT of blunt trauma to the
bowel and mesentery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:53-58, 1993
13. Pachter HL, Spencer FC, Hofstetter SR, et al: Significant trends in the
treatment of hepatic trauma. Experience with 411 injuries. Ann Surg
215:492-500; discussion 500-492, 1992
14. Cogbill TH, Moore EE, Jurkovich GJ, et al: Nonoperative management
of blunt splenic trauma: a multicenter experience. J Trauma 29:1312-
1317, 1989
15. Flancbaum L, Morgan AS, Fleisher M, et al: Blunt bladder trauma:
manifestation of severe injury. Urology 31:220-222, 1988
16. Gomez GA, Alvarez R, Plasencia G, et al: Diagnostic peritoneal lavage
in the management of blunt abdominal trauma: a reassessment.
J Trauma 27:1-5, 1987
17. Mucha P Jr: Changing attitudes toward the management of blunt
splenic trauma in adults. Mayo Clin Proc 61:472-477, 1986
18. Brotman S, Oliver G, Oster-Granite ML, et al: The treatment of 179
blunt trauma-induced liver injuries in a statewide trauma center. Am
Surg 50:603-608, 1984
Imaging of blunt abdominal trauma
19. DuPriest RW Jr, Rodriguez A, Khaneja SC, et al: Open diagnostic
peritoneal lavage in blunt trauma victims. Surg Gynecol Obstet 148:
890-894, 1979
20. Alho A, Karaharju O, Kallio E: Blunt hepatic injury. Ann Chir Gynae-
col 67:66-69, 1978
21. Gill W, Champion HR, Long WB, et al: Abdominal lavage in blunt
trauma. Br J Surg 62:124-124, 1975
22. Yoon W, Jeong YY, Kim JK, et al: CT in blunt liver trauma. Radio-
graphics 25:87-104, 2005
23. Madoff DC, Denys A, Wallace MJ, et al: Splenic arterial interventions:
anatomy, indications, technical considerations, and potential compli-
cations. Radiographics 25:S191-S211, 2005 (suppl 1)
24. Balogh Z, Caldwell E, Heetveld M, et al: Institutional practice guide-
lines on management of pelvic fracture-related hemodynamic insta-
bility: do they make a difference? J Trauma 58:778-782, 2005
25. Labori KJ, Raeder MG: Diagnostic approach to the patient with jaun-
dice following trauma. Scand J Surg 93:176-183, 2004
26. Brook I: Intra-abdominal, retroperitoneal, and visceral abscesses in
children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 14:265-273, 2004
27. Peitzman AB, Harbrecht BG, Rivera L, et al: Failure of observation of
blunt splenic injury in adults: variability in practice and adverse con-
sequences. J Am Coll Surg 201:179-187, 2005
28. Haan JM, Bochicchio GV, Kramer N, et al: Nonoperative management
of blunt splenic injury: a 5-year experience. J Trauma 58:492-498,
2005
29. Wahl WL, Ahrns KS, Chen S, et al: Blunt splenic injury: operation
versus angiographic embolization. Surgery 136:891-899, 2004
30. Tsugawa K, Koyanagi N, Hashizume M, et al: New insight for man-
agement of blunt splenic trauma: significant differences between
young and elderly. Hepatogastroenterology 49:1144-1149, 2002
31. Mizzi A, Shabani A, Watt A: The role of follow-up imaging in paedi-
atric blunt abdominal trauma. Clin Radiol 57:908-912, 2002
32. Minarik L, Slim M, Rachlin S, et al: Diagnostic imaging in the fol-
low-up of nonoperative management of splenic trauma in children.
Pediatr Surg Int 18:429-431, 2002
33. Patselas TN, Gallagher EG: The diagnostic dilemma of diaphragm
injury. Am Surg 68:633-639, 2002
34. Killeen KL, Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE: Imaging of traumatic dia-
phragmatic injuries. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 23:184-192, 2002
35. Shackleton KL, Stewart ET, Taylor AJ: Traumatic diaphragmatic inju-
ries: spectrum of radiographic findings. Radiographics 18:49-59,
1998
36. Murray JG, Caoili E, Gruden JF, et al: Acute rupture of the diaphragm
due to blunt trauma: diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of CT. AJR
Am J Roentgenol 166:1035-1039, 1996
37. Voeller GR, Reisser JR, Fabian TC, et al: Blunt diaphragm injuries. A
five-year experience. Am Surg 56:28-31, 1990
38. Hammond JS, Yudd A, Schwartz LB, et al: Peritoneoscintigraphy in
the diagnosis of traumatic diaphragmatic rupture. Am Surg 62:1055-
1059, 1996
39. Baron BJ, Scalea TM, Sclafani SJ, et al: Nonoperative management of
blunt abdominal trauma: the role of sequential diagnostic peritoneal
lavage, computed tomography, and angiography. Ann Emerg Med
22:1556-1562, 1993
40. Feliciano DV: Diagnostic modalities in abdominal trauma. Peritoneal
lavage, ultrasonography, computed tomography scanning, and arte-
riography. Surg Clin North Am 71:241-256, 1991
41. Hawkins ML, Bailey RL Jr, Carraway RP: Is diagnostic peritoneal la-
vage for blunt trauma obsolete? Am Surg 56:96-99, 1990
42. Shreck GL, Toalson TW: Delayed presentation of traumatic rupture of
the diaphragm. J Okla State Med Assoc 96:181-183, 2003
43. Orsi P, Rollo S, Montanari M, et al: [Rupture of the diaphragm caused
by closed thoraco-abdominal trauma. Case contribution and
anatomo-clinical considerations]. G Chir 19:13-17, 1998
44. Gelman R, Mirvis SE, Gens D: Diaphragmatic rupture due to blunt
trauma: sensitivity of plain chest radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol
156:51-57, 1991
45. Iochum S, Ludig T, Walter F, et al: Imaging of diaphragmatic injury: a
205
diagnostic challenge? Radiographics 22(Spec No.):S103-S116;
discussion S116-S108, 2002
46. Rees O, Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K: Multidetector-row CT of right
hemidiaphragmatic rupture caused by blunt trauma: a review of 12
cases. Clin Radiol 60:1280-1289, 2005
47. Larici AR, Gotway MB, Litt HI, et al: Helical CT with sagittal and
coronal reconstructions: accuracy for detection of diaphragmatic in-
jury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:451-457, 2002
48. Bergin D, Ennis R, Keogh C, et al: The “dependent viscera” sign in CT
diagnosis of blunt traumatic diaphragmatic rupture. AJR Am J Roent-
genol 177:1137-1140, 2001
49. Tsuda M, Ichiki K, Doki Y, et al: [Thoracic surgical approach for
traumatic diaphragmatic hernia]. Kyobu Geka 57:949-952, 2004
50. Barbiera F, Nicastro N, Finazzo M, et al: The role of MRI in traumatic
rupture of the diaphragm. Our experience in three cases and review of
the literature. Radiol Med (Torino) 105:188-194, 2003
51. Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, White CS, et al: MR imaging evalua-
tion of hemidiaphragms in acute blunt trauma: experience with 16
patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:397-402, 1996
52. Goliath J, Mittal V, McDonough J: Traumatic handlebar hernia: a rare
abdominal wall hernia. J Pediatr Surg 39:e20-e22, 2004
53. Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Van Holsbeeck B, et al: Diagnosis and treat-
ment of expanding haematoma of the lateral abdominal wall after
blunt abdominal trauma. Eur Radiol 9:1553-1555, 1999
54. Klingler PJ, Wetscher G, Glaser K, et al: The use of ultrasound to
differentiate rectus sheath hematoma from other acute abdominal
disorders. Surg Endosc 13:1129-1134, 1999
55. Zainea GG, Jordan F: Rectus sheath hematomas: their pathogenesis,
diagnosis, and management. Am Surg 54:630-633, 1988
56. Hardcastle TC, Du Toit DF, Malherbe C, et al: Traumatic abdominal
wall hernia—four cases and a review of the literature. S Afr J Surg
43:41-43, 2005
57. Aguirre DA, Santosa AC, Casola G, et al: Abdominal wall hernias:
imaging features, complications, and diagnostic pitfalls at multi-de-
tector row CT. Radiographics 25:1501-1520, 2005
58. Mancel B, Aslam A: Traumatic abdominal wall hernia: an unusual
bicycle handlebar injury. Pediatr Surg Int 19:746-747, 2003
59. Lane CT, Cohen AJ, Cinat ME: Management of traumatic abdominal
wall hernia. Am Surg 69:73-76, 2003
60. Hickey NA, Ryan MF, Hamilton PA, et al: Computed tomography of
traumatic abdominal wall hernia and associated deceleration injuries.
Can Assoc Radiol J 53:153-159, 2002
61. Killeen KL, Girard S, DeMeo JH, et al Using CT to diagnose traumatic
lumbar hernia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1413-1415, 2000
62. Esposito TJ, Fedorak I: Traumatic lumbar hernia: case report and
literature review. J Trauma 37:123-126, 1994
63. Toutouzas KG, Karaiskakis M, Kaminski A, et al: Nonoperative man-
agement of blunt renal trauma: a prospective study. Am Surg 68:
1097-1103, 2002
64. Bode PJ, Edwards MJ, Kruit MC, et al: Sonography in a clinical algo-
rithm for early evaluation of 1671 patients with blunt abdominal
trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:905-911, 1999
65. Romano L, Giovine S, Guidi G, et al: Hepatic trauma: CT findings and
considerations based on our experience in emergency diagnostic im-
aging. Eur J Radiol 50:59-66, 2004
66. Poletti PA, Wintermark M, Schnyder P, et al: Traumatic injuries: role
of imaging in the management of the polytrauma victim (conservative
expectation). Eur Radiol 12:969-978, 2002
67. Ravera M, Cocozza E, Reggiori A: Blunt splenic rupture— experience
in a preserving non-operatively orientated care team in a tropical
hospital. S Afr J Surg 37:41-44, 1999
68. Becker CD, Mentha G, Terrier F: Blunt abdominal trauma in adults:
role of CT in the diagnosis and management of visceral injuries. Part 1:
liver and spleen. Eur Radiol 8:553-562, 1998
69. Van Etten EP, van Popta T, Van Luyt PA, et al: Changes in the diag-
nosis and treatment of traumatic splenic rupture: a retrospective anal-
ysis of 99 consecutive cases. Eur J Emerg Med 2:196-200, 1995
70. Tricarico A, Sicoli F, Calise F, et al: Conservative treatment in splenic
trauma. J R Coll Surg Edinb 38:145-148, 1993
206
71. Andersson R, Bengmark S: Conservative treatment of liver trauma.
World J Surg 14:483-486, 1990
72. Wolf Y, Vinograd I, Katz S, et al: Non-operative management of trau-
matized spleen in children: the role of open abdominal tap. Z Kinder-
chir 42:23-25, 1987
73. Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K: Trauma radiology: part I. Computer-
ized tomographic imaging of abdominal trauma. J Intensive Care Med
9:151-163, 1994
74. Shanmuganathan K. Multi-detector row CT imaging of blunt abdom-
inal trauma. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 25:180-204, 2004
75. Barquist ES, Pizano LR, Feuer W, et al: Inter- and intrarater reliability
in computed axial tomographic grading of splenic injury: why so
many grading scales? J Trauma 56:334-338, 2004
76. Hackam DJ, Potoka D, Meza M, et al: Utility of radiographic hepatic
injury grade in predicting outcome for children after blunt abdominal
trauma. J Pediatr Surg 37:386-389, 2002
77. Shapiro MJ, Krausz C, Durham RM, et al: Overuse of splenic scoring
and computed tomographic scans. J Trauma 47:651-658, 1999
78. Mohr AM, Lavery RF, Barone A, et al: Angiographic embolization for
liver injuries: low mortality, high morbidity. J Trauma 55:1077-1081;
discussion 1081-1072, 2003
79. Kushimoto S, Arai M, Aiboshi J, et al: The role of interventional radi-
ology in patients requiring damage control laparotomy. J Trauma
54:171-176, 2003
80. Willmann JK, Roos JE, Platz A, et al: Multidetector CT: detection of
active hemorrhage in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. AJR Am J
Roentgenol 179:437-444, 2002
81. Okamoto K, Norio H, Kaneko N, et al: Use of early-phase dynamic
spiral computed tomography for the primary screening of multiple
trauma. Am J Emerg Med 20:528-534, 2002
82. Fang JF, Chen RJ, Wong YC, et al: Classification and treatment of
pooling of contrast material on computed tomographic scan of blunt
hepatic trauma. J Trauma 49:1083-1088, 2000
83. Taylor GA, Kaufman RA, Sivit CJ: Active hemorrhage in children after
thoracoabdominal trauma: clinical and CT features. AJR Am J Roent-
genol 162:401-404, 1994
84. Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, Sover ER: Value of contrast-enhanced
CT in detecting active hemorrhage in patients with blunt abdominal
or pelvic trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 161:65-69, 1993
85. Gavant ML, Schurr M, Flick PA, et al: Predicting clinical outcome of
nonsurgical management of blunt splenic injury: using CT to reveal
abnormalities of splenic vasculature. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:207-
212, 1997
86. Killeen KL, Shanmuganathan K, Boyd-Kranis R, et al: CT findings after
embolization for blunt splenic trauma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:209-
214, 2001
87. Goffette PP, Laterre PF: Traumatic injuries: imaging and intervention
in post-traumatic complications (delayed intervention). Eur Radiol
12:994-1021, 2002
88. Pinto A, Magliocca M, Grassi R, et al: [Role of computerized tomog-
raphy in the diagnosis of peritoneo-intestinal lesions resulting from
closed trauma. Experience at 2 emergency departments]. Radiol Med
(Torino) 101:177-182, 2001
89. Miller LA, Shanmuganathan K: Multidetector CT evaluation of ab-
dominal trauma. Radiol Clin North Am 43:1079-1095, viii, 2005
90. Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE: CT scan evaluation of blunt hepatic
trauma. Radiol Clin North Am 36:399-411, 1998
91. Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, Reaney SM: Pictorial review: CT ap-
pearances of contrast medium extravasations associated with injury
sustained from blunt abdominal trauma. Clin Radiol 50:182-187,
1995
92. Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE: CT evaluation of the liver with acute
blunt trauma. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 36:73-113, 1995
93. Peiper HJ: Significance of traumatology in abdominal and vascular
surgery. Jpn J Surg 15:93-102, 1985
94. Gupta A, Stuhlfaut JW, Fleming KW, et al: Blunt trauma of the pan-
creas and biliary tract: a multimodality imaging approach to diagnosis.
Radiographics 24:1381-1395, 2004
A.L. Stanescu et al
95. Benedict MD, Rafal R: Finding of CT and MR evaluation of gallbladder
hemobilia. Emerg Radiol 10:46-48, 2003
96. Kohler R, Millin R, Bonner B, et al: Laparoscopic treatment of an
isolated gallbladder rupture following blunt abdominal trauma in a
schoolboy rugby player. Br J Sports Med 36:378-379; discussion 379,
2002
97. Endress C, Wollschlaeger G: Traumatic gallbladder rupture: CT diag-
nosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:738, 1995
98. Colletti PM, Barakos JA, Ralls PW, et al: Hepatobiliary scintigraphy
and scintiangiography in abdominal trauma. Clin Nucl Med 12:901-
909, 1987
99. Harrell DJ, Vitale GC, Larson GM: Selective role for endoscopic ret-
rograde cholangiopancreatography in abdominal trauma. Surg En-
dosc 12:400-404, 1998
100. Hewett JJ, Freed KS, Sheafor DH, et al: The spectrum of abdominal
venous CT findings in blunt trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:955-
958, 2001
101. Taga S, Ezaki T, Yano K, et al: Hepatic venous injury; a case report of
atriocaval shunt by a centrifugal pump. Hepatogastroenterology 44:
1219-1221, 1997
102. Mehall JR, Ennis JS, Saltzman DA, et al: Prospective results of a stan-
dardized algorithm based on hemodynamic status for managing pe-
diatric solid organ injury. J Am Coll Surg 193:347-353, 2001
103. Allins A, Ho T, Nguyen TH, et al: Limited value of routine followup
CT scans in nonoperative management of blunt liver and splenic
injuries. Am Surg 62:883-886, 1996
104. Luks FI, Lemire A, St-Vil D, et al: Blunt abdominal trauma in children:
the practical value of ultrasonography. J Trauma 34:607-610; discus-
sion 610-611, 1993
105. Maull KI, Rozycki GS, Vinsant GO, et al: Retroperitoneal injuries:
pitfalls in diagnosis and management. South Med J 80:1111-1115,
1987
106. Al-Salamah SM, Mirza SM, Ahmad SN, et al: Role of ultrasonography,
computed tomography and diagnostic peritoneal lavage in abdominal
blunt trauma. Saudi Med J 23:1350-1355, 2002
107. Shah P, Applegate KE, Buonomo C: Stricture of the duodenum and
jejunum in an abused child. Pediatr Radiol 27:281-283, 1997
108. Kunin JR, Korobkin M, Ellis JH, et al: Duodenal injuries caused by
blunt abdominal trauma: value of CT in differentiating perforation
from hematoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:1221-1223, 1993
109. Goldman SM, Sandler CM. Urogenital trauma: imaging upper GU
trauma. Eur J Radiol 50:84-95, 2004
110. Savage C, Reabe S, Goldman SM, et al: Imaging of bilateral uretero-
pelvic junction laceration from blunt trauma. Emerg Radiol 10:99-
101, 2003
111. Beyrouti MI, Beyrouti R, Kchaou I, et al: [Duodeno-pancreatic trauma.
About 14 cases]. Tunis Med 83:73-82, 2005
112. Ludwig K, Petermann J, Lorenz D: [Diagnosis and therapy of trau-
matic injury of the pancreas]. Zentralbl Chir 123:245-250, 1998
113. Wales PW, Shuckett B, Kim PC: Long-term outcome after nonopera-
tive management of complete traumatic pancreatic transection in chil-
dren. J Pediatr Surg 36:823-827, 2001
114. Lucas CE, Ledgerwood AM: Factors influencing outcome after blunt
duodenal injury. J Trauma 15:839-846, 1975
115. Nowak MM, Baringer DC, Ponsky JL: Pancreatic injuries. Effective-
ness of debridement and drainage for nontransecting injuries. Am
Surg 52:599-602, 1986
116. Jobst MA, Canty TG Sr, Lynch FP. Management of pancreatic injury in
pediatric blunt abdominal trauma. J Pediatr Surg 34:818-823; discus-
sion 823-814, 1999
117. Kim HS, Lee DK, Kim IW, et al: The role of endoscopic retrograde
pancreatography in the treatment of traumatic pancreatic duct injury.
Gastrointest Endosc 54:49-55, 2001
118. Sekino Y, Kobayashi A, Takagi S, et al: Successful treatment for com-
bined pancreatoduodenal injury by a second-stage pancreatojejunos-
tomy following pancreatoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology
51:1674-1675, 2004
119. Yeung CY, Lee HC, Huang FY, et al: Pancreatitis in children— expe-
rience with 43 cases. Eur J Pediatr 155:458-463, 1996
Imaging of blunt abdominal trauma
120. Bigattini D, Boverie JH, Dondelinger RF. CT of blunt trauma of the
pancreas in adults. Eur Radiol 9:244-249, 1999
121. Coppola V, Vallone G, Verrengia D, et al: [Pancreatic fractures: the
role of CT and the indications for endoscopic retrograde pancreatog-
raphy]. Radiol Med (Torino) 94:335-340, 1997
122. Lane MJ, Mindelzun RE, Sandhu JS, et al: CT diagnosis of blunt
pancreatic trauma: importance of detecting fluid between the pan-
creas and the splenic vein. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:833-835, 1994
123. Sivit CJ, Eichelberger MR, Taylor GA, et al: Blunt pancreatic trauma in
children: CT diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158:1097-1100, 1992
124. Jayaraman MV, Mayo-Smith WW, Movson JS, et al: CT of the duode-
num: an overlooked segment gets its due. Radiographics 21(Spec
No.):S147-S160, 2001
125. Becker CD, Mentha G, Schmidlin F, et al: Blunt abdominal trauma in
adults: role of CT in the diagnosis and management of visceral inju-
ries. Part 2: Gastrointestinal tract and retroperitoneal organs. Eur
Radiol 8:772-780, 1998
126. Rescorla FJ, Plumley DA, Sherman S, et al: The efficacy of early ERCP
in pediatric pancreatic trauma. J Pediatr Surg 30:336-340, 1995
127. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Yelon JA, et al: Magnetic resonance cholan-
giopancreatography (MRCP) in the assessment of pancreatic duct
trauma and its sequelae: preliminary findings. J Trauma 48:1001-
1007, 2000
128. Scaglione M, de Lutio di Castelguidone E, Scialpi M, et al: Blunt
trauma to the gastrointestinal tract and mesentery: is there a role for
helical CT in the decision-making process? Eur J Radiol 50:67-73,
2004
129. Holmes JF, Offerman SR, Chang CH, et al: Performance of helical
computed tomography without oral contrast for the detection of gas-
trointestinal injuries. Ann Emerg Med 43:120-128, 2004
130. Timaran CH, Daley BJ, Enderson BL: Role of duodenography in the
diagnosis of blunt duodenal injuries. J Trauma 51:648-651, 2001
131. Ciftci AO, Tanyel FC, Salman AB, et al: Gastrointestinal tract perfora-
tion due to blunt abdominal trauma. Pediatr Surg Int 13:259-264,
1998
132. Kim HC, Shin HC, Park SJ, et al: Traumatic bowel perforation: anal-
ysis of CT findings according to the perforation site and the elapsed
time since accident. Clin Imaging 28:334-339, 2004
133. Levine CD, Gonzales RN, Wachsberg RH, et al: CT findings of bowel
and mesenteric injury. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:974-979, 1997
134. Taylor GA, Sivit CJ: Computed tomography imaging of abdominal
trauma in children. Semin Pediatr Surg 1:253-259, 1992
135. Stuhlfaut JW, Soto JA, Lucey BC, et al: Blunt abdominal trauma:
performance of CT without oral contrast material. Radiology 233:
689-694, 2004
136. Halsted MJ, Racadio JM, Emery KH, et al: Oral contrast agents for CT
of abdominal trauma in pediatric patients: a comparison of dilute
hypaque and water. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1555-1559, 2004
137. Allen TL, Mueller MT, Bonk RT, et al: Computed tomographic scan-
ning without oral contrast solution for blunt bowel and mesenteric
injuries in abdominal trauma. J Trauma 56:314-322, 2004
138. Federle MP, Yagan N, Peitzman AB, et al: Abdominal trauma: use of
oral contrast material for CT is safe. Radiology 205:91-93, 1997
139. Federle MP, Peitzman A, Krugh J: Use of oral contrast material in
abdominal trauma CT scans: is it dangerous? J Trauma 38:51-53,
1995
140. Rathaus V, Pomeranz A, Shapiro-Feinberg M, et al: Isolated severe
renal injuries after minimal blunt trauma to the upper abdomen and
flank: CT findings. Emerg Radiol 10:190-192, 2004
141. Noor MA, Ather MH: Difference in the outcome of patients managed
with isolated renal injury and co-existent abdominal organ injury. J
Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 15:29-32, 2003
142. Baverstock R, Simons R, McLoughlin M: Severe blunt renal trauma: a
7-year retrospective review from a provincial trauma centre. Can
J Urol 8:1372-1376, 2001
143. Santucci RA, Langenburg SE, Zachareas MJ: Traumatic hematuria in
children can be evaluated as in adults. J Urol 171:822-825, 2004
144. Smith JK, Kenney PJ. Imaging of renal trauma. Radiol Clin North Am
41:1019-1035, 2003
207
145. Brown SL, Haas C, Dinchman KH, et al: Radiologic evaluation of
pediatric blunt renal trauma in patients with microscopic hematuria.
World J Surg 25:1557-1560, 2001
146. Morey AF, Bruce JE, McAninch JW: Efficacy of radiographic imaging
in pediatric blunt renal trauma. J Urol 156:2014-2018, 1996
147. Miller KS, McAninch JW: Radiographic assessment of renal trauma:
our 15-year experience. J Urol 154:352-355, 1995
148. Stein JP, Kaji DM, Eastham J, et al: Blunt renal trauma in the pediatric
population: indications for radiographic evaluation. Urology 44:406-
410, 1994
149. Ihara N, Yashiro N, Itoh K, et al: Early ureteral luminal enhancement
on computed tomography in a renal trauma patient: a characteristic
sign of communication between artery and collecting system. Radiat
Med 22:272-274, 2004
150. Brandes SB, McAninch JW: Urban free falls and patterns of renal
injury: a 20-year experience with 396 cases. J Trauma 1999;47:643-
649; discussion 649-650, 1999
151. Titton RL, Gervais DA, Hahn PF, et al: Urine leaks and urinomas:
diagnosis and imaging-guided intervention. Radiographics 23:1133-
1147, 2003
152. Blankenship JC, Gavant ML, Cox CE, et al: Importance of delayed
imaging for blunt renal trauma. World J Surg 25:1561-1564, 2001
153. Bretan PN Jr, McAninch JW, Federle MP, et al: Computerized tomo-
graphic staging of renal trauma: 85 consecutive cases. J Urol 136:561-
565, 1986
154. Fanney DR, Casillas J, Murphy BJ: CT in the diagnosis of renal trauma.
Radiographics 10:29-40, 1990
155. Sebastia MC, Rodriguez-Dobao M, Quiroga S, et al: Renal trauma in
occult ureteropelvic junction obstruction: CT findings. Eur Radiol
9:611-615, 1999
156. Harris AC, Zwirewich CV, Lyburn ID, et al: CT findings in blunt renal
trauma. Radiographics 21(Spec No.):S201-S214, 2001
157. Sufrin G: The Page kidney: a correctable form of arterial hypertension.
J Urol 113:450-454, 1975
158. Sofocleous CT, Hinrichs C, Hubbi B, et al: Angiographic findings and
embolotherapy in renal arterial trauma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
28:39-47, 2005
159. Morey AF, Iverson AJ, Swan A, et al: Bladder rupture after blunt
trauma: guidelines for diagnostic imaging. J Trauma 51:683-686,
2001
160. Deck AJ, Shaves S, Talner L, Porter JR: Current experience with com-
puted tomographic cystography and blunt trauma. World J Surg 25:
1592-1596, 2001
161. Pao DM, Ellis JH, Cohan RH, et al: Utility of routine trauma CT in the
detection of bladder rupture. Acad Radiol 7:317-324, 2000
162. Morgan DE, Nallamala LK, Kenney PJ, et al: CT cystography: radio-
graphic and clinical predictors of bladder rupture. AJR Am J Roent-
genol 174:89-95, 2000
163. Deck AJ, Shaves S, Talner L, et al: Computerized tomography cystog-
raphy for the diagnosis of traumatic bladder rupture. J Urol 164:43-
46, 2000
164. Festini G, Gregorutti S, Reina G, et al: Isolated intraperitoneal bladder
rupture in patients with alcohol intoxication and minor abdominal
trauma. Ann Emerg Med 20:1371-1372, 1991
165. Rehm CG, Mure AJ, O’Malley KF, et al: Blunt traumatic bladder rup-
ture: the role of retrograde cystogram. Ann Emerg Med 20:845-847,
1991
166. Schwarz M, Horev G, Freud E, et al: Traumatic adrenal injury in
children. Isr Med Assoc J 2:132-134, 2000
167. Burks DW, Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K: Acute adrenal injury after
blunt abdominal trauma: CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158:503-
507, 1992
168. Pinto A, Scaglione M, Pinto F, et al: Adrenal injuries: spectrum of CT
findings. Emerg Radiol 10:30-33, 2003
169. Patten RM, Spear RP, Vincent LM, et al: Traumatic laceration of the
liver limited to the bare area: CT findings in 25 patients. AJR Am J
Roentgenol 160:1019-1022, 1993
170. Yao DC, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mirvis SE, et al: Using contrast-enhanced helical
CT to visualize arterial extravasation after blunt abdominal trauma:
208
incidence and organ distribution. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:17-20,
2002
171. Tixedor N, Lesnik A, Vernhet H, et al: [Embolization treatment of a
traumatic adrenal hemorrhage]. J Radiol 80:733-735, 1999
172. Lewis JV: Bilateral adrenal hemorrhage after blunt trauma: diagnosis
by computed tomography. South Med J 87:1269-1271, 1994
173. Rana AI, Kenney PJ, Lockhart ME, et al: Adrenal gland hematomas in
trauma patients. Radiology 230:669-675, 2004
174. Dueck A, Poenaru D, Kamal I: Hypertension following minor trauma:
a rare presentation of pheochromocytoma. Pediatr Surg Int 15:508-
509, 1999
175. Longo WE, Degutis LC, Baker CC: Blunt hollow viscus injuries of the
digestive tract: a poorly recognized phenomenon. Conn Med 53:451-
454, 1989
176. Watts DD, Fakhry SM: Incidence of hollow viscus injury in blunt
trauma: an analysis from 275,557 trauma admissions from the East
multi-institutional trial. J Trauma 54:289-294, 2003
177. Munns J, Richardson M, Hewett P: A review of intestinal injury from
blunt abdominal trauma. Aust NZ J Surg 65:857-860, 1995
178. Moss RL, Musemeche CA: Clinical judgment is superior to diagnostic
tests in the management of pediatric small bowel injury. J Pediatr Surg
31:1178-1181; discussion 1181-1172, 1996
179. Brownstein MR, Bunting T, Meyer AA, et al: Diagnosis and manage-
ment of blunt small bowel injury: a survey of the membership of the
American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma 48:402-
407, 2000
180. Neugebauer H, Wallenboeck E, Hungerford M: Seventy cases of inju-
ries of the small intestine caused by blunt abdominal trauma: a retro-
spective study from 1970 to 1994. J Trauma 46:116-121, 1999
181. Ferrera PC, Verdile VP, Bartfield JM, et al: Injuries distracting from
intraabdominal injuries after blunt trauma. Am J Emerg Med 16:145-
149, 1998
182. Menegaux F, Tresallet C, Gosgnach M, et al: Diagnosis of bowel and
mesenteric injuries in blunt abdominal trauma: a prospective study.
Am J Emerg Med 24:19-24, 2006
183. Pikoulis E, Delis S, Psalidas N, et al: Presentation of blunt small intes-
tinal and mesenteric injuries. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82:103-106, 2000
184. Shih HC, Wen YS, Ko TJ, et al: Noninvasive evaluation of blunt ab-
dominal trauma: prospective study using diagnostic algorithms to
minimize nontherapeutic laparotomy. World J Surg 23:265-269; dis-
cussion 269-270, 1999
185. Halvorsen RA Jr, McKenney K: Blunt trauma to the gastrointestinal
tract: CT findings with small bowel and colon injuries. Emerg Radiol
9:141-145, 2002
186. Killeen KL, Shanmuganathan K, Poletti PA, et al: Helical computed
tomography of bowel and mesenteric injuries. J Trauma 51:26-36,
2001
187. Jamieson DH, Babyn PS, Pearl R: Imaging gastrointestinal perforation
in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma. Pediatr Radiol 26:188-194,
1996
188. Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K, Erb R: Diffuse small-bowel ischemia in
hypotensive adults after blunt trauma (shock bowel): CT findings and
clinical significance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:1375-1379, 1994
189. Sivit CJ, Taylor GA, Bulas DI, et al: Posttraumatic shock in children:
CT findings associated with hemodynamic instability. Radiology 182:
723-726, 1992
A.L. Stanescu et al
190. Taylor GA, Fallat ME, Eichelberger MR: Hypovolemic shock in chil-
dren: abdominal CT manifestations. Radiology 164:479-481, 1987
191. Sharma OP, Oswanski MF, Singer D, et al: The role of computed
tomography in diagnosis of blunt intestinal and mesenteric trauma
(BIMT). J Emerg Med 27:55-67, 2004
192. Butela ST, Federle MP, Chang PJ, et al: Performance of CT in detection
of bowel injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:129-135, 2001
193. Brody JM, Leighton DB, Murphy BL, et al: CT of blunt trauma bowel
and mesenteric injury: typical findings and pitfalls in diagnosis. Ra-
diographics 20:1525-1536; discussion 1536-1527, 2000
194. Strouse PJ, Close BJ, Marshall KW, et al: CT of bowel and mesenteric
trauma in children. Radiographics 19:1237-1250, 1999
195. Nastanski F, Cohen A, Lush SP, et al: The role of oral contrast admin-
istration immediately prior to the computed tomographic evaluation
of the blunt trauma victim. Injury 32:545-549, 2001
196. Tsang BD, Panacek EA, Brant WE, et al: Effect of oral contrast admin-
istration for abdominal computed tomography in the evaluation of
acute blunt trauma. Ann Emerg Med 30:7-13, 1997
197. Eanniello VC 2nd, Gabram SG, Eusebio R, et al: Isolated free fluid on
abdominal computerized tomographic scan: an indication for surgery
in blunt trauma patients? Conn Med 58:707-710, 1994
198. Rathaus V, Zissin R, Werner M, et al: Minimal pelvic fluid in blunt
abdominal trauma in children: the significance of this sonographic
finding. J Pediatr Surg 36:1387-1389, 2001
199. Miller PR, Meredith JW, Johnson JC, et al: Prospective evaluation of
vacuum-assisted fascial closure after open abdomen: planned ventral
hernia rate is substantially reduced. Ann Surg 239:608-614; discus-
sion 614-606, 2004
200. Goldman R, Zilkoski M, Mullins R, et al: Delayed celiotomy for the
treatment of bile leak, compartment syndrome, and other hazards of
nonoperative management of blunt liver injury. Am J Surg 185:492-
497, 2003
201. Laffargue G, Taourel P, Saguintaah M, et al: CT diagnosis of abdom-
inal compartment syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:771-772,
2002
202. Epelman M, Soudack M, Engel A, et al: Abdominal compartment
syndrome in children: CT findings. Pediatr Radiol 32:319-322, 2002
203. Pickhardt PJ, Shimony JS, Heiken JP, et al: The abdominal compart-
ment syndrome: CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:575-579,
1999
204. Lin PH, Barr V, Bush RL, et al: Isolated abdominal aortic rupture in a
child due to all-terrain vehicle accident—a case report. Vasc Endovas-
cular Surg 37:289-292, 2003
205. Berthet JP, Marty-Ane CH, Veerapen R, et al: Dissection of the abdom-
inal aorta in blunt trauma: Endovascular or conventional surgical
management? J Vasc Surg 38:997-1003; discussion 1004, 2003
206. Roth SM, Wheeler JR, Gregory RT, et al: Blunt injury of the abdominal
aorta: a review. J Trauma 42:748-755, 1997
207. Michaels AJ, Gerndt SJ, Taheri PA, et al: Blunt force injury of the
abdominal aorta. J Trauma 41:105-109, 1996
208. Duncan IC, Sher BJ, Fingleson LM: Blunt injury of the infrarenal
inferior vena cava—imaging and conservative management. S Afr
J Surg 43:20-21, 2005
209. Parke CE, Stanley RJ, Berlin AJ: Infrarenal vena caval injury following
blunt trauma: CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17:154-157,
1993