lands of the public domain, which are the only natural resources the Fact: government can alienate. In their present state, the 592.15 In 1973, the Comissioner on Public Highways entered into a hectares of submerged areas are inalienable and outside the contract to reclaim areas of Manila Bay with the Construction and commerce of man. Development Corportion of the Philippines (CDCP). 3. Since the Amended JVA seeks to transfer to AMARI, a private PEA (Public Estates Authority) was created by President Marcos corporation, ownership of 77.34 hectares110 of the Freedom under P.D. 1084, tasked with developing and leasing reclaimed Islands, such transfer is void for being contrary to Section 3, Article lands. These lands were transferred to the care of PEA under P.D. XII of the 1987 Constitution which prohibits private corporations 1085 as part of the Manila Cavite Road and Reclamation Project from acquiring any kind of alienable land of the public domain. (MCRRP). CDCP and PEA entered into an agreement that all future projects under the MCRRP would be funded and owned by 4. Since the Amended JVA also seeks to transfer to AMARI PEA. ownership of 290.156 hectares111 of still submerged areas of Manila Bay, such transfer is void for being contrary to Section 2, By 1988, President Aquino issued Special Patent No. 3517 Article XII of the 1987 Constitution which prohibits the alienation of transferring lands to PEA. It was followed by the transfer of three natural resources other than agricultural lands of the public domain. Titles (7309, 7311 and 7312) by the Register of Deeds of Paranaque to PEA covering the three reclaimed islands known as PEA may reclaim these submerged areas. Thereafter, the the FREEDOM ISLANDS. government can classify the reclaimed lands as alienable or disposable, and further declare them no longer needed for public Subsquently, PEA entered into a joint venture agreement (JVA) service. Still, the transfer of such reclaimed alienable lands of the with AMARI, a Thai-Philippine corporation to develop the Freedom public domain to AMARI will be void in view of Section 3, Article XII Islands. Along with another 250 hectares, PEA and AMARI entered of the 1987Constitution which prohibits private corporations from the JVA which would later transfer said lands to AMARI. This acquiring any kind of alienable land of the public domain. caused a stir especially when Sen. Maceda assailed the agreement, claiming that such lands were part of public domain (famously known as the “mother of all scams”). Peitioner Frank J. Chavez filed case as a taxpayer praying for mandamus, a writ of preliminary injunction and a TRO against the sale of reclaimed lands by PEA to AMARI and from implementing the JVA. Following these events, under President Estrada’s admin, PEA and AMARI entered into an Amended JVA and Mr. Chaves claim that the contract is null and void. Issue: w/n: the transfer to AMARI lands reclaimed or to be reclaimed as part of the stipulations in the (Amended) JVA between AMARI and PEA violate Sec. 3 Art. XII of the 1987 Constitution w/n: the court is the proper forum for raising the issue of whether the amended joint venture agreement is grossly disadvantageous to the government. Held: On the issue of Amended JVA as violating the constitution: 1. The 157.84 hectares of reclaimed lands comprising the Freedom Islands, now covered by certificates of title in the name of PEA, are alienable lands of the public domain. PEA may lease these lands to private corporations but may not sell or transfer ownership of these lands to private corporations. PEA may only sell these lands to Philippine citizens, subject to the ownership limitations in the 1987 Constitution and existing laws. 2. The 592.15 hectares of submerged areas of Manila Bay remain inalienable natural resources of the public domain until classified as alienable or disposable lands open to disposition and declared no longer needed for public service. The government can make such classification and declaration only after PEA has reclaimed these 1