1) The scholar notes that many Adventists are no longer moved by the 1844 event in heaven 160 years ago since it has changed nothing on earth and seems distant from the Second Coming.
2) The scholar provides several points that have helped them personally make sense of the meaning of 1844, including that it adds urgency to gospel preaching and confirms Adventism's divine origins.
3) The scholar argues that recent world events like terrorism and natural disasters give pre-advent significance to 1844 and show we are in the time of the end.
1) The scholar notes that many Adventists are no longer moved by the 1844 event in heaven 160 years ago since it has changed nothing on earth and seems distant from the Second Coming.
2) The scholar provides several points that have helped them personally make sense of the meaning of 1844, including that it adds urgency to gospel preaching and confirms Adventism's divine origins.
3) The scholar argues that recent world events like terrorism and natural disasters give pre-advent significance to 1844 and show we are in the time of the end.
1) The scholar notes that many Adventists are no longer moved by the 1844 event in heaven 160 years ago since it has changed nothing on earth and seems distant from the Second Coming.
2) The scholar provides several points that have helped them personally make sense of the meaning of 1844, including that it adds urgency to gospel preaching and confirms Adventism's divine origins.
3) The scholar argues that recent world events like terrorism and natural disasters give pre-advent significance to 1844 and show we are in the time of the end.
Dr Ford expressed the same concerns in 1980 (see page 18).
The laborious trek across year-day,
One scholar makes the following 457 BC etc in this work has been for observation relative to Chapter 6: a reason. Internet material abounds The problem for Adventists with repeating Dr Ford’s 1980 1844 is not the details of the propositions (see Chapter 10) so this chronology (the 457 BC date, the work has endeavored to address each day for a year etc) but the of Dr Ford’s points honestly. For continuation with time. For our many these propositions are still pioneers 1844 (that is, the topical. Folk such as Dale Ratzlaff investigative judgment) was a brief (“The Cultic Doctrine of Seventh-day act of God that interfaced closely Adventists”) continue to ventilate with the Second Advent. The 1980 issues without admitting that intervening 160 years now most issues have been addressed. separates 1844 from the Second Advent and gives it an There are some considerations about eschatological stance somewhat 1844 which have helped me independent of the Second Advent. personally. May I share them? Hence it is becoming difficult for Adventists to give 1844 an 1. If the apostles lived today their eschatological meaning that does frustration would exceed ours. not overshadow the biblical They were expecting the emphasis on the two advents of Advent 1,972 years ago. Christ. In other words it is now difficult for us to call 1844 the 2. Events such as 9/11, the Bali “pre-advent” judgment in any bombing, the Iran earthquake meaningful way. You do not seem and the late 2004 Asian to sense this difficulty or really Tsunamis, add pre-advent addressed it. This is not just the urgency to 1844. Students of problem of some esoteric scholar; Bible prophecy see end-time many Adventists are not significance in these events. particularly moved by an event in Events such as this are quickly heaven 160 years ago that has forgotten but the terror is not. changed nothing on earth. It is odd The world today is on edge in that Adventist historicism has this anticipation of more of the crucial date not on earth but in same. Against prophecy, heaven – that’s Platonism not events such as these for me historicism isn’t it? It is at the end revitalize 1844 as pre-advent of the day a pastoral as much as a phenomena. theological challenge.
i APPENDIX to Chapter 6 ii
3. The judgment of the wicked is 9. The pioneers looked at the
to occupy 1000 years. 160 investigative judgment as a years for the judgment of the brief act of God interfacing righteous must be considered closely with the Second against that scale. Advent. Intermittent acceptance of justification by 4. 1844 tucks into ‘time of the faith may explain the end’ schema depicted in continuing delay. In recent Daniel, the Olivet Discourse, decades this truth become 2 Thessalonians and events in more widely proclaimed with Revelation. It is one more peg a loud voice. Technology in the ground nestled many advancing at exponential pace amongst others that casts our will finish the work in months. day in the time of the end. Global warning must outrun global warming. 5. 1844 adds urgency to gospel proclamation and is calculated 10. August 2003 brought into to galvanize listeners to effect the EU Working Time penitence. Directive. Article 5 legislates a weekly rest period to include 6. It is arguable that 1844 is Sunday. This civil legislative evidence of Adventism’s action follows on from the divine sponsorship. Vatican’s 31 May 1998 Apostolic letter, in which 7. 1844 indeed points to a Section 67 recommends civil heavenly event. The origin of legislation to ensure Sunday evil occurred many thousands sacredness. USA Bishops of years ago, also in heaven’s voted on Nov 15 2004 to join sanctuary. Evil began and will the USA evangelical alliance end in the heavenly sanctuary called ‘Christian Churches for it is the place of God’s Together USA’. Since 1844, throne. These reasons the SDA Church has warned harmonise the 1844 heavenly these phenomena would occur event with the drama of the in the last days. ages. The earthly veil is a glass darkly which be-clouds These points add dimension to 1844. our view. For those with faith, While some nit-pick at theological an event in heaven is just as gnats, the fast-moving sweep of exciting as an event on earth. current events confirm the credibility of Ellen White’s ‘The Great 8. The Second Advent is as close Controversy’. She also foretold the as our next heart-beat and in events in 10. She wholeheartedly the event of our untimely supported 1844 and the investigative death, the Advent is only one judgment and must be taken more sleep away. seriously than her embittered critics. ii