Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Boyd Group - Q2 2018 - Final2
Boyd Group - Q2 2018 - Final2
September 2018
1
Forward-Looking Statements
2
Capital Markets Profile (as at September 7, 2018)
3
Company Overview
• Leader and one of the largest operators of collision repair shops in North America
by number of locations (non-franchised)
• Consolidator in a highly fragmented US$38.0 billion market
• One of the largest retail auto glass operators in the U.S.
• Only public company in the auto collision repair industry in North America
• Recession resilient industry
Revenue Contribution:
By Country By Payor
15-20% < 10%
Canada Customer Pay/Other
4
Collision Operations
5
North American Collision Repair Footprint
Canada
•
•
Ontario (76)
Alberta (16)
122
locations
• Manitoba (14)
• British Columbia (14)
• Saskatchewan (2)
U.S.
403
locations
• Florida (60) • Oregon (9)
• Illinois (57) • Tennessee (9)
• Michigan (47) • Oklahoma (5)
• North Carolina (29) • Pennsylvania (5)
• Ohio (27) • Utah (5)
• Washington (26) • Nevada (4)
• Indiana (26) • Texas (3)
• Georgia (25) • Alabama (2)
• Arizona (20) • Idaho (1)
• Colorado (19) • Kansas (1)
• Louisiana (11) • Kentucky (1)
• Maryland (10) • Wisconsin (1)
6
Glass Operations
7
North American Glass Footprint
U.S.
• Alabama • Nevada
• Arizona • New Hampshire
• Colorado • New York
• Connecticut • North Carolina
• District of Columbia • Ohio
• Florida • Oklahoma
• Georgia • Oregon
• Idaho • Pennsylvania
• Illinois • Rhode Island
• Indiana • Tennessee
• Kentucky • Texas
• Louisiana • Utah
• Massachusetts • Virginia
• Maryland • Washington
• Michigan • West Virginia
• Minnesota • Wisconsin
• Missouri • Wyoming
8
Market Overview &
Business Strategy
9
Large, Fragmented Market
U.S. Collision Repair Market
Dealer-
Large MSO owned
24.6% Shops
19.5%
Single Shops Small MSO Independent
67.2% and Repair
Franchises Shops
8.2% 80.5%
Source: The Romans Group, “Advancing Our Insights Into the 2016 Collision Repair Marketplace”
10
Evolving Collision Repair Market
Source: The Romans Group, “Advancing Our Insights Into the 2016 Collision Repair Marketplace”
11
Strong Relationships with
Insurance Companies through DRPs
12
Insurer Market Dynamics
Other
Insurers
28.3% Other
40.5%
DRP
Top 10 59.5%
Insurers
71.7%
13
Impact of Collision Avoidance Systems
• CCC estimates technology will reduce Impact of Crash Avoidance on Vehicle
accident frequency by ~30% in next 25-30 Claim Counts *
years -31% CY 2050
• Collision avoidance technology may lessen -30% CY 2045
the extent of damage in some accidents, -29% CY 2040
leading to less required repairs, but also a -25% CY 2035
higher percentage of repairable vehicles (less
-19% CY 2030
total losses)
-11% CY 2025
• Offsetting factors to accident frequency -3% CY 2020
decline include:
Increases in repair costs due to the additional
-1% CY 2015
repair or replacement requirements of
collision avoidance technology; and -1% CY 2014
Increases in vehicle miles driven resulting from 0% CY 2013
increases in ride-share and related increased 0% CY 2012
utilization of registered vehicles CY 2011
0%
• Large operators could also mitigate market 0% CY 2010
decline by continued market share gains in
-35% -30% -25% -20% -15% -10% -5% 0%
consolidating industry
All Rights Reserved Copyright 2018 CCC Information Services Inc.
*Source: CCC Information Services Inc. Crash Course 2018: Updated projection expands the ADAS technology to include systems like lane
departure warning, adaptive headlights, and blind spot monitoring, uses HLDI’s predictions in regard to the ramp-up in percent of registered
vehicle fleet equipped with each system, and includes projections of the number of vehicles in operation in the U.S. Projections based on current
projected annual rate of change - impact may increase with changes in market adoption and system improvements
14
Business Strategy
Operational Expense
excellence management
Enhance
UNIT
Unitholder THE BOYD
HOLDERS GROUP
Value
15
Operational Excellence – WOW Operating Way
16
Expense Management
35.0%
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
17
SSSG - Optimizing Returns
from Existing Operations
Same-store sales increases in 33 of 40 most recent quarters
13%
3-year average SSSG: 4.1%
8%
3%
-2%
-7%
Q2-08
Q3-08
Q4-08
Q1-09
Q2-09
Q3-09
Q4-09
Q1-10
Q2-10
Q3-10
Q4-10
Q1-11
Q2-11
Q3-11
Q4-11**
Q1-12
Q2-12
Q3-12
Q4-12
Q1-13
Q2-13
Q3-13
Q4-13
Q1-14
Q2-14
Q3-14
Q4-14
Q1-15
Q2-15
Q3-15
Q4-15
Q1-16
Q2-16
Q3-16
Q4-16
Q1-17
Q2-17
Q3-17***
Q4-17
Q1-18
Q2-18
*Total Company, excluding FX.
**Adjusting for the positive impact of hail in Q4-10, Q4-11 SSSG was 4.7%
***Adjusting for the negative impact of Hurricane Irma and Hurricane Harvey, Q3-17 SSSG was 1.0%
18
Focus on Accretive Growth
19
Strong Growth in Collision Locations
120 600
525
100 500
105
80 400
60 300
64 58
40 200
42
54
29 30
20 100
0 0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD 2018
Annual additions Total locations
• May 2013: acquisition of Glass America added 61 retail auto glass locations
• March 2016: acquisition of 4 retail auto glass locations
20
Financial
Review
21
Revenue Growth
(C$ millions)
$1,569.4
$1,600
$1,387.1
$1,400
$1,174.1
$1,200
$1,000
$844.1
$800
$578.3
$600
$434.4
$400
$200
$0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
22
Adjusted EBITDA Growth
(C$ millions)
$145.6
$140
$124.3
$120
$101.7
$100
$80
$69.0
$60
$41.5
$40
$29.4
$20
$0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
23
Financial Summary
3-months ended 6-months ended
(C$ millions, except per unit and percent amounts)
June 30, June 30, June 30, June 30,
2018 2017 2018 2017
* Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net earnings, and adjusted distributable cash are not recognized measures under International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"). See the Fund’s Q2 2018 MD&A for more information.
24
Strong Balance Sheet
(in C$ millions) June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
Net Debt
(total debt, including current portion and bank indebtedness, $174.9 $219.1
net of cash)
25
Financial Flexibility
26
U.S. Tax Reform Impact
• U.S. effective tax rate decreased by 13% after considering state taxes
beginning January 1, 2018
• Proforma 2017 (if tax reform was effective January 1, 2017): would have
lowered total tax expense (current and deferred) by approximately
$11.0M
• Boyd’s low leverage makes interest deductibility limitation very unlikely
to impact Boyd unless its leverage increases significantly in the future
• Tax efficiency of the income trust structure is still maintained, however
the benefit is reduced due to lower U.S. tax rate
• The Company is currently rolling out enhancements to benefits for U.S.
employees that will be funded by a portion of the tax savings to be
realized from U.S. Tax Reform
27
Distributions
$0.45
$0.40
Nov 12 - Nov 13 - Nov 14 - Nov 15 - Nov 16 - Nov 17 -
Oct 13 Oct 14 Oct 15 Oct 16 Oct 17 present
28
Five-year Return to Unitholders
Boyd Group S&P/TSX Composite S&P/TSX Income Trust
800%
5-year
700% total return:
600% 553.50%*
500%
400%
300%
200% S&P/TSX
Composite
100% 51.3%
0%
S&P/TSX
Income Trust
-100%
31-Dec-12 31-Dec-13 31-Dec-14 31-Dec-15 31-Dec-16
40.8% 31-Dec-17
29
Delivering long-term value to unitholders
• Best 10-year performance on the TSX in 2015 and 2016
• Second best 10-year performance on the TSX in 2017
S&P/TSX Composite Index +9,966.5%
BYD.UN
+5,795.6%
+4,655%
+58.6% +57.5%
+15.4%
30
Experienced & Committed
Management Team
31
Outlook
32
Summary
33