posed tote openes een though sone woul actualy bret. Using Robert Gilpin
_avariety of research methodologies, Margalit finds that individuals fear not so much Pr
Secemoni cneqncs th ind al comequc cl getlabn THE NATURE
would be expected to show gateway strong
eee OF POLITICAL ECONOMY
But why have these states not done beter? Ross examines contending explorations
lack of democracy, il war, lick of oppertentes for momen, poor government
poles andaed goverment station He cance al pet-stae dont Themen cepts heey coc aise ce
parca dil taskol managing woke and vay rere | ttn se The chet mes, lla Lei pc comeing
loin inertness wth esto chico. Whee al
The eed of capt ap sed acts the diminion ofthe poet of the
spell nit of dona dealing Ge pee ofthe moka apo
tain beim paper, Lv agus for «pow alm
ro he new nrc mini powas! wich could countabalance American compote
5 domination, What appears wo one athe hil
Wiese sre ft rina coe ay esa consequenc of economic oy
the pa of
call conening
Ponce Gs 12 == gens tothe other 1o be an efit
the routers of mode ge the ion
‘sae is a very old-fashioned idea and bad! vei :
cert of pom
| nbee rere emcee rem Alkhough the advent ofthe mulation oo
wor pation has pa the question of the vlan
between economics and pois in 4 ew Ul
hese two staterents—the Fist by Kati Levit, ic iv am old isu In che nineteemth ent fo
2 Canadian nationals, the econ by George example, it was this issue chat divided ase
Bl, a former United States undersecretary of liberals like John Stuart Mill frm economic
stae—expes.a dominant theme of contemporary nanan, epesentad by Georg Frei hi
tings on inenaioal tcaions. Interasonal Whereas he former gave primacy in the onan
ie, we at tol is inctasingly ret between its ton of socery to economics and the producto of
conornic adits politcal oranization. On the wealth, the later emphasized che poli de
ome hand, portal economic and techno mination of economic rations, As this be Ie
I imerdepenkn ork cre bch othe comemporay debate a the
foes ae rein hi
con thus diminishing
«ance of national Boundaries On the other band, this study, this chaper analyzes the thiee mala
he tain signif multinational corporation aw the argue of
the nation tae coins to command men’ loy-_ etments of he relationship between economies
akc and o beth basic unit of pl decison and pls thas, the thee major idols of
making, As one writer has put the issue, “The pola economyThe Meaning of Political
Economy
The
et
modern worl, sa reciprocal one. On the one
hand, pits Inge determines te framowark of
conomic activity and channels it in detoas
co ofthis sy ita the reationship
n economics and pelts, a as in the
mended serve the inert of dominant group
the exercise of power in all ts forms is major
determinant ofthe nur of an economic stem.
(On the other hand, the economic proces ise
tends to vedisibute power and wealth ic rans
fovms the poner eationhip among groups, This
in van leads toa transformation ofthe polit
system, chy giving sew a new secure of
economic rlaonsips. Thus, the dynamic of in
ational elaions inthe modem word is gly
2 fut of the reioal interaction Kerween
conomics and pois
Fin ofall, what do T mean by “polis” or
“economics Charles Kindleberge speak of eo-
nomics and politic two diferent methods of
reource: the fit throwgh a
marke mechanism, the hae through a budget
Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye, in a excellent
analysis of imenationa poli economy dein
economics and pols in tems of two level of
analysis chose of structure and of process Pl
allocating scarce
tis is he domain "having ro do with the tab
lishment ofan order af relations, astructue
Economics deals with “shor-erm allocative
behavior (holding insttcons fundamental
asumptions, and expectations constan).
Like Kindlebergr’ definiion, however, hide
nition tends 1 isobve economic and pola!
Phenomena except under certain conditions
Which Keahane and Ny define a the“ plticia
si” ofthe economic system, Nether formal
tio comes to ermsaequaey withthe dynamic
and inmate nature ofthe relationship beowsen
In chis sty, the ise of the relationship
berween economics and polis anaes ino that
becween wel and power According this state
ment ofthe problem, economics aks a ts prov
ic the rein and disribton of weak; polis
isthe realm of power. Ishll examin thir ean
ship fom several idechgcl perspec, incdud
ing my own, Bur wha is well? Whats owe
Tn response tothe question, What is wealth
an conomisccolegue responded, “What do you
seam, my thitsceond othiry-slume answer”
Basie concepts ae elusive in ecanomics, as jn any
field of inquiry. No unchallengeble definitions
are possible. Ask a physic fer his dfnition of
the nature of space, tig, and matter, and you
will no gc avery satisfying response. What you
will eis an operational deniton, one whichis
use ic permits the physic ro build an ioe
ecu lfice whoe foundations would crumble
under the scrutiny ofthe philosopher
Simialy, the concept of wealth, upon which
the since of economic imately ests, cannot be
laid ina defi way. Paul Sarena his
textbook, doce even ey, though he provides 2
clue in his dfn of economics “the sad
of how mun and soci doe. erp
productive resources...t0 produce various
commode... and distibuethem for consump
‘on Following this ad, wecan syst we is
anything (apa nd or abr) ha cam generate
Fre incone ts composed of phys sets and
human cpt inclding embodied knowledge.
The asc cone of pial scence is owes
Most political scietss would nt stop hee: they
oul includ nthe denon of politi science
‘he purpose for which powers use, whether his
be the advancement of the public welfare o the
domination of one group oer another. In any
«ase few would dissent fom the following tar
ment of Harold Laswell and Abraham Kaplan
The comept of poner is pehaps the most
Fandamenl in the whole of pli cence
‘he poi proce is theshaing. ditto,
dese poner Gna wide ee, fal che
desecrate, oof inlaracein ge
Powers such is noe the sl ot even the pring
pal gal of state behavior. Oter goals or valves
consteute thecbjectives parsed by atom state:
ele, scurry, peste. Buc power in its sect
foxms (itary economic, psyebologia) l
smatythe necessary means to acieve these gol
For this reason nation states are itensely jealous
of and sensitive to thet elatve power postion
The dsribution of powers important becanse i
profoundly affcs the ably of states wo achieve
wha they perceiver be het incre.
The nature of power, however, is even more
clasivethan tha oF welt, The number and var:
ctyofdefiniions should beam embarrassment to
polical scientists. Unfovronately, his study
cannot bring the nradisiliary squabble ro an
end. Rates, adops the defition wed by Hans
Morgenthau in his influential Polis among
Nation:“manisconeol oer the minds and actions
of other men Thus, power ite wea, isthe
capa to produce erin resus
Unlike wea, however, power cn not be
untied nded, it canot be overemphasized
that power has an inpatantpycholgial
dimension, Perepton of power raion ate of
eritcal importance: asa consequence, funda
rental ask of statesmen is to manipulate the
perception of othe statesmen regarding the dis
tribution of ower. Moreover, powers elativeto
a spi sitation ost of circumstances there
isto single hierarchy of power in international
relations, Power may take many forms—miltary.
economic, opsycologicsl—though, i the inal
analy, force is the ukimare form of poe.
Finally the inabily 1 predic the behavior of
st signif
others rte outcome of events if
cance. Uncertaimgy regarding the distribution of
power and te ability of the statesmen to contd
‘evens plays an important tle in incernational
relations. Ukimatey the determination of she
Aisaibuion of power can te made only in retro
spect asa consequence of wa. His precisely for
this eason hat war has ha unforrunatey, such
4 cena pce inthe hisory of iteration
relations. In short, power is am elsive concept
indeed upon which to eect science of politi,
The dsinction***berweea economics asthe i
cence of wealth and pots the scence of power
is esemially an analytical ne. In dhe eal word
wealth and power are wkimaey joined. This, in
fact is the basic ational fora politcal ecomomy
of tteationa relations. Ba n onde o develop
theargument of tis study, wealth and power will
tbe ated, a st forth moment, 8 aaltically
distince,
To provide a perspective on the mature of
pica ecomomy, the next setan ofthe chapter
wll discs the three preaing conceptions of
poli economy: beralisn, Marxism, and er
anvils, Liberalism regsds polities and evo
nomics as rdlavely sparble and autonomous
spheres of activites: I assoate mos professional
conomists as wells many other acaderics, bus
resmen, and American oficals with this out
look, Maryam efirs to tv radical critique of
cepitalsm idemfied with Kal Marc and his com
temporary dail aconding to this conception,
economics determines plies and politcal stu
ture Mercanilis is amare questionable term
because ofits historical asaiaton withthe desire
of pation tates for a ade spas and for weasure
(money). Oe mus ditngsh, homer, berween
the speci foom mescanlim cok in the seven
general
tect and eightcrth cenaies and the
cvlook of mercatisicshwght. The esence of
the mercantile perspecti, whether itis ke
economic nationalism, pe
urine of the German Histrcal Schoo, isthe sub
servence of the economy to the state and its
Gilpin The Nature of Patcsl Economy 5inersts—imerests that ange fiom matters of
domestic ele ths ofinterational scsi
Jes his more general meaning of mera
thas implied bythe use of the em in hissy
Three Conceptions of
Political Economy
The thre pean conceptions of poll econ
omy dle on many pis, See ita die
coves wil be examined in his bef compan.
(See Tble9.1)
The Nature of Economic
Relations
‘The basic assumprion of liberalism is that che
‘acu of imemaionalecanomi elton iesen
aly harmonious Herein ly she great inlet
jnnovaion of Adam Sith, Disputing his me