ISSUE – Does the witnesses presented by the prosecution were credible witnesses?

HELD – No. The Supreme court held that it did not find merit in the appellant's
argument that the prosecution's evidence is weak because unlike the defense, it did not
present any disinterested witness.

He suggests that since the place where the incident happened is thickly
populated, there were many people who saw the gunmen and who could have
pointed to the accused if they were the ones who committed the crime
considering that they were familiar to the residents of the area. In the first
place, it was not shown that at the time the incident occurred, many people
were already awake and were able to see the gunmen. In the second place,
assuming that it was so shown, the determination of who should be utilized as
witnesses by