Gempesaw vs. CA GR 92244, 9 February 1993 Second Division, Campos Jr. (J) Facts: Natividad Gempesaw issued checks, prepared by her bookkeeper, a total of 82 checks in favor of several supplies. Most of the checks for amounts in excess of actual obligations as shown in their corresponding invoices. It was only after the lapse of more than 2 yeats did she discovered the fraudulent ‘manipulations of her bookkeeper. It was also learned that the indorsements of the payee were forged, and the ‘checks were brought to the chief accountant of Philippine Bank of Commerce (the Drawee Bank, Buendia Branch) who deposited them in the accounts of Alfredo Romero and Benito Lam. Gempesaw made demand ‘upon the bank to credit the amount charged due the checks. ‘The bank refused. Hence, the present action, Issue: Who shall bear the loss resulting from the forged indorsements. Held: As a rule, a drawee bank who has paid a check on which an indorsement has been forged cannot charge the crawer’s account for the amount of said check. An exception to the rule is where the drawer is guilty of such negligence which causes the bank to honor such checks. Gempesaw did not exercise prudence in taking steps that a careful and prudent businessman would take in circumstances to discover discrepancies in her account. Her negligence was the proximate cause of her loss, and under Section 23 of the Negotiable Instruments Law, is precluded from using forgery as a defense. On the other hand, the banking rule banning acceptance of checks for deposit or cash payment with more than one indorsement unless cleared by some bank officials does not invalidate the instrument; neither does it invalidate the negotiation or transfer of sald checks. The only kind of indorsement which stops the further negotiation of an instrument is a restrictive indorsement witich prohibits the further negotiation thereof, pursuant to Section 36 of the Negotiable Instruments Law. In light of any case not provided for in the Act that is to be governed by the provisions of cexisting legislation, pursuant to Section 196 of the Negotiable Instruments Law, the bank may be held liable for damages in accordance with Article 1170 of the Civil Code. The drawee bank, in its failure to discover the fraud committed by its employee and in contravention banking rules in allowing a chief accountant to deposit. the checks bearing second indorsements, was adjudged liable to share the loss with Gempesaw on a 50:50 ratio,