DRILLING
Jack Up Rigs: Evolution of Design
Jean Cahuzac
Jean Chevallier
Lee Turner
‘Montrouge, France
In August 1988, Sedco Forex’s jack up tg,
Trident 1X, spudlded a well for Cabinda Gulf
il Company (Chevron Corp.) off the coa
ff Angola in a record water depth of 391
feet (119 meters). Built in 1982, Trident 1x
vas the first jack up developed for depths
Lup to 400 feot [122 meters] (right). Until the
late 1970s, most jack up rigs were designed
to operate in shallow water, up to 250 fect
[76 meters}, and in mild environments,
Today, several jack ups are capable of work
Jing at 400-foot depths and in adverse ocean
nd weather conditions previously reserved
for semi-submersibles and cil ships
Sell-levating jack ups are the most com
‘mon offshore drilling unit. A jack up has
several advantages that may appeal to the
‘operator, the most important being, cost. A
jack up is less expensive to build than any
‘ther type of offshore rig and this con:
tributes to a lower day rate and therefore
Tower operating costs forthe oil company.
Logistical expenses are also lower. lack ups
require a smaller crew than other rigs, and
less powerful boats fo move them. A jack up
usualy requites no anchoring.
Jack ups also have lower maintenance
costs, There is no subsea blowout preven:
tion system and the wellhead assembly is
much simpler. Cost may also be reduced
Volume 1 Number 1
seco Foren’ Tide 1 jack up rig cil in 2 record water depth of 391 eet [19 meters) in
showe Angola,
because of less down time. Once on loca:
tion, the rig’ lack of mobility makes drilling
‘operations more straightforward than on rigs
that move with the ocean swell
The limitations of jack ups are safety and
water depth, although as the Trident IX
record suggests the depth limitation is being,
stretched. A jack up's legs must be firmly
implanted on the ocean floor and stay there
throughout the drilling operation. Two
major problems can arise. Firs, the legs
may not be long enough to accommodate
the water depth and some penetration into
the ocean sediments. Second, during
drilling, one oF more of the legs may sud
‘denly punch through a weak layer of formas
tion, toppling the rig into the ocean.
‘Another safety limitation with jack ups isthat they cannot be moved off location in
case of a blowoul or other mishap.
‘Most jack up rigs have three legs.! Each
leg is formed from a lattice of K-shaped
trusses fabricated with reinforced steel
tubes. The tubular leg extremities may be
set in place directly on the ocean floor if it
can withstand the rig’s pressure of about
140 pounds per square inch (psi) [10 kilo
trams per square centimeter (kg/cm). For
‘cean floors of intermediate strength, the
legs are equipped with so-called spud cans
that reduce pressure to about 40 psi
3kgy/em?| by distributing the ri’s weight
‘over a larger area (below). The spud can is
cular of polygonal and constructed with a
heavy point to penetrate the hardest sea
floor. The point also serves to ease retrieval
from soit floors. Most jack ups are designed
to allow about 30 feet [9 meters} of leg pen:
tetration into the ocean floor. ln exceptional
Circumstances, up to 150 feet [46 meters} of
penetration has been experienced,
Very soft ocean floors may require so
called mat jack ups (right). A steel mat
welded to the bottom of the ig’ legs, dis
ibutes the weight ofthe rig evenly on the
‘ocean floor reducing pressure to 4 psi (0.3,
kg/cm]. However, a mat requires a rather
flat ocean floor, ree of irregularities that
might damage the mat
1, Seco Forex only Jick op wth our eg he
vr nth rd quis 9 four eg ai.
2. Seaco Fare ack ups excep he Tent i
Cons
36
1One of Tent 1s
three spud ean ding
‘om Toyo ship:
sate ig was
ering Co
(Mode) and delivered
in 1983. The te ver
thal bes at the spud
ect with the g's
three vertical cho
The tubes sre 60 feet
118.3 meters)
loescate
The trend toward using jack up rigs in
deeper water and more hostile conditions
stimulated several innovations in leg and
the jack up system design, jack up's st:
bility depends on its weight resisting the
horizontal loads of the wind, waves and
Current of the worst possible storm. A crit
cal point is where bending moments caused
by the horizontal forces exerted on the legs
are transmitted to the main body of the rig
or hull
'A matiyp jack up, the Seco Fore “Luan
in tans. The sec, horseshoe shaped mit
fnange is welded to the bron of te rs eas
to pronide sale weigh dstbution on soft oces
floors. The igi. ed on the cack of
2 carir vessel 0 fod ther,
the vessel submerged dep enough to at the
‘up. Then the tansport vessels debated.
Oilfield ReviewUppers
iv
7
ewer use
‘radial facing system, in which overturn
Jing moment fs mainly borne by gues above ards
Delow the jack house, Vertical rst forces hick
arm at the jacks rack aa pinion mechanism
‘are equal both sides ofthe eg, indicating that the
Jacks bear only the ry’ buoyant weight. The
‘vertuming moment is canted bythe hovizniad
thas forces a the guides. Note te ri’ rao
and ney legs
Volume 1 Number 1
Jacking Up System
In the traditional jack up rig, the jacks are
strong enough to elevate the hull, but ean-
not bear any bending moment.? The
‘moment is resisted at guides above and
bplow the rack and pinion mechanisms that
raise and lower each leg. This design
requites some distance between the upper
and lower guides and slender, heavily con-
structed legs (lef) In the Trident IX, the
jacking units are more robust andthe bene
ing moment is sustained mainly atthe rack
and pinion mechanisms mounted on the
three vertical elements of each leg, called
chor.) Only a small part of the moment is
tome by guides below)
To sustain bending moment in this way
required increasing the distance between
chhords to 60 feet [18.3 meters. This leads
to large but ight legs, which in tum leads to
A less expensive rg, ‘Tident X's legs weigh
only 1.74 tons per foot 0.53 tons per meter
compared with 2.13 tons per foot 10.65 tons
ident Ws jcking
ssten in which
benelng moment is
mainly bome at the
Jack hooses be
fei. The vertical ust
forces a the jacks
either ide of es are
‘neq, indicating
substantia overtaing
‘moment i being
Pied there. Tiden Xs
Ter les oe es
resistance to wind and
‘water det