Sem. Herman C.

Bundac

Pascal’s Wager

According to Pascal every human being faces a challenge to choose: to choose

whether to believe in God or not. for him it depends upon you if your beliefs or not that
Got exist, that’s your choice, hence if you believe that God exists then you must obey
God in your day to day life, you must obey His commands, then if you decide to not
believe God does not exist that is your choice, you can live in accordance to your belief
but if God exist you lose your commitment and your life to Him.

On one hand It is possible that God exists in the same way it is possible that He
does not exists .If one believes in the God then if He exists then one receives an
infinitely great reward and if he does not exist then one loses little or nothing. On the
other hand It is better to either receive an infinitely great reward or lose little or nothing
than it is to either receive an infinitely great punishment or gain little or nothing. It is
better to believe in God than it is not to believe in God. It is rational to believe in the
God and irrational not to believe in the God. If one course of action is better than
another then it is rational to follow that course of action and irrational to follow the
other.

My Conclusion is it is better to believe that God exist, than not to believe in him
because if he really exist the you cannot vanished the wage but instead you win the
reward in that is eternal life in heaven,

Source

:https://www.patheos.com/blogs/everydayethics/2017/03/pascals-wager-argument-gods-existence/