You are on page 1of 54

Mudlogging Services

Mohamed Bekhit
14 February 2010
Mud Logging: An Overview

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


1
What Is Mud Logging?

• Mud logging is the process of continuously collecting,


recording and analyzing the meaningful solids, fluids,
and gasses brought to the surface by mud.

• Provide comprehensive drilling data parameter


recording, monitoring and analysis.

• Real-time information service….

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


2
Mudlogging Operations – Drilling Crew

• Rig superintendent (Day toolpusher)


• Night toolpusher
• Drillers
• Assistant drillers
• Derrickman
• Roughnecks
• Roustabouts / load handling crew
• Mechanics and Electricians
• Catering / living quarters crew
© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
3
Mudlogging Operations – Connection

• Adding fresh length (joint


or stand) of pipe so that
the bit can drill deeper.

• While connection check


the pit system level and
check gas trap level and
shakers.

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


4
Mudlogging Operations – Connection

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


5
Mudlogging Operations – Tripping

• Withdrawing the drillstring is


known as (tripping out) and the
whole operation of extraction
and re-insertion (tripping in) of
the drillstring is a round trip.
• POOH (pull out of hole) is
another expression for tripping
out.
• RIH (run in hole) is another
expression for tripping in

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


6
Mudlogging Operations – POOH

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


7
Mudlogging Operations – RIH

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


8
Mudlogging Operations

Wiper Trip
• To prevent cuttings build up, esp. in deviated wells
• POOH to last casing shoe or to pull out a few stands
(10-30 stands)

Back-reaming
• Continuous rotation of the Drillstring as it is being
pulled out of the hole in order to keep the hole clean
and maintain the wellbore in gauge

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


9
Drilling Fluid Circulating System

1. Suction Pit
2. Mud Pump
3. Standpipe
4. Swivel
5. Kelly
6. Drillstring and Bit
7. Annulus
8. Return Flowline /
Shakers
9. Suction Pit

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


10
Circulating System – Shale Shaker

Shale shaker

Possum belly

Flowline
© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
11
Lag Time Determination

• What is Lag Time


• What are the factors affecting Lag Time
• How is Lag Time measured
• How is Lag Time checked

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


12
Lag Time Definition

• Lag time is the definite time interval required for


pumping drilled cuttings from a particular depth to the
surface where they can be collected
• Always exists
• Changes continuously as the hole deepens
• Must be frequently checked and corrected

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


13
Lag Time

Factors Affecting Lag Time


• Volume of the mud in the Annulus
• Mud flow rate

Annulus
• It is the space around a pipe in the wellbore, the outer
wall being the wall of either the hole or casing
• Sometimes called annular space

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


14
Lag Time

Volume of Mud in the Hole


• As hole gets deeper, mud volume increases,
therefore, lag time increases
• As the annular diameter gets larger due to hole
washouts the mud volume increases, the lag time
increases

Mud Flow Rate


• The faster the mud is pumped the quicker it returns to
the surface and hence the lag time is reduced

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


15
Lag Time Measured Using Velocity Method

Annular velocity ann. sec (ft/min) = 24.51 x Q / (D2 – d2)


Where,

Q = flow rate (gpm), D = hole or casing ID (ins.), d =


DP/DC OD (ins.)

Lag time ann. sec (mins) = Length of annular section / Annular


velocity of annular section
Lag time (mins) =  Lag time ann. sec
Lag time (strokes) = Lag time (mins) x spm

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


16
Lag Time Measured Using Volume Method

Annular volume = (D2 – d2) x 0.000971 x Length of annular


section
or
Annular volume = ((D2 – d2) / 1029.4) x Length of annular
section
Lag time ann. sec (mins) = Annular volume (bbls) / flow rate
(bbls/min)
Lag time (mins) =  Lag time ann. sec
• Disadvantage: affected by flow rate changes

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


17
Lag Time Measured Using Volume Method

Annular volume = (D2 – d2) x 0.000971 x Length of annular


section or
Annular volume = ((D2 – d2) / 1029.4) x Length of annular
section
Pump Output (bbls/stroke) = Pump output (gpm) / (spm x
42)
Lag time ann. sec (strokes) = Annular volume (bbls) / Pump
Output (bbls/stroke)
• Advantage: not affected by changes in flow rate

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


18
Well Profile

• Depth: 7750 ft
• Hole size: 8.5”
• Pump Output: 425 gpm at 100 spm
• Casing:
– shoe at 6000 ft
– 9 5/8” OD; 9” ID
• DP:
– 6350 ft.
– 5” OD; 4.276” ID
• DC:
– 1400 ft.
– 7” OD; 3.5” ID

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


19
Example #1 (Velocity Method)

Section 1: 24.51 x 425 / (92 - 52)


Annular Velocity = 186 ft/min
Annular Section = 6000 feet
Lag Time for Section = 32.26 minutes

Section 2: 24.51 x 425 / (8.52 - 52)


Annular Velocity = 220.46 ft/min
Annular Section = 350 feet
Lag Time for Section = 1.59 minutes
© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
20
Example #1 (Velocity Method)

Section 3: 24.51 x 425 / (8.52 - 72)


Annular Velocity = 448 ft/min
Annular Section = 1400 feet
Lag Time for Section = 3.13 minutes

Total Lag Time = 32.26 + 1.59 + 3.13 = 36.98 minutes

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


21
Example #2 (Volume Method)

Section 1: (92 - 52) x 0.000971 x 6000


Annular volume = 326.25 bbls

Section 2: (8.52 - 52 ) x 0.000971 x 350


Annular volume = 16.05 bbls

Section 3: (8.52 - 72 ) x 0.000971 x 1400


Annular volume = 31.60 bbls

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


22
Example #2 (Volume Method)

Pump output (bbls/min) = 425 gpm/42 = 10.12 bbls/min


Pumps are pumping at 100 spm -> Pump output
(bbls/stroke)= 10.12/100 = 0.1012 bbls/stroke

Total Lag Time (strokes)


= (326.25 + 16.05 + 31.6) / 0.1012
= 374.15 / 0.1012 = 3697 strokes

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


23
Lag Time Check

• Under normal circumstances a check should be made


every twenty-four hours or 400 ft, whichever comes
first. However, if carbide information is required due to
suspicions of incorrect lag or washout, then carbides
should be run as required
• A tracer is used to obtain an “accurate” measurement of
lag time
• Common tracers used are:
– Calcium carbide (most common)
– Rice, lentil, cellophane
• Carbide + water -> acetylene
© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.
24
Example

• Example:
– Actual strokes from carbide = 5128 strokes
• Calculations:
– Down strokes are 1278 strokes.
– Lag strokes are 3697 strokes
– Pump output is 0.1012 bbls/stroke

• Calculate carbide check?

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


25
Collecting a Sample

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


26
Reasons For Sample Collection

• Paleontological Analysis
• Geochemical Analysis
• Oil Company Partners
• Governmental Requirements
• Future Reference / Library Samples

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


27
Sample Intervals

• Set by the client


• Common intervals: 5 feet to 30 feet
• Regardless of the sampling interval, under no circumstances
should the Mudloggers neglect their other responsibilities
• Other times that the sample interval should be shortened:
– During coring – 1 ft or 0.5 meter intervals
– Areas of geological interest
– Changes in drilling parameters (drill breaks / reverse drill breaks,
torque changes)
– Changes in mud properties (viscosity, cut MW, chlorides, etc)
– Changes in gas content

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


28
Sample Types

• Unwashed Samples
• Washed and Dried Samples
• Geochemical Samples
• Paleontological Samples
• Metal Shavings
• Mud Samples

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


29
Sample Collection

• Install a sample collection board at the base of the shaker


• Try to collect from the shaker with the smallest mesh size
• Samples are taken at regular intervals specified by the
client
• Samples should be taken when changes in ROP,
background gas or any other parameter is noticed
• When sampling in smaller intervals than required, the
sample bags should be progressively filled up
• Clean the sample board after a sample is taken

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


30
Sample Catching Board

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


31
Sample Preparation

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


32
Cuttings Examination

• Samples are examined under the microscope for:


– Lithology
– Oil staining
– Porosity

• Objective:
– To depict changes of lithology and appearance of
new formations

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


33
Cuttings Examination

Sources of Sample Contamination

• Cavings
• Recycled Cuttings
• Mud Chemicals
• Cement
• Metal
• Unrepresentative Samples

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


34
Sample Description

Major Functions of Sample Description

• Allows others to understand the components and


structure of the rock and to draw conclusions as to the
source, depositional environment and subsequent
history of the formation
• Allows others to recognize the rock whenever it is
seen again

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


35
Porosity and Permeability

• Porosity is a measure of the volume of void space in


the rock. It determines the amount of fluid that is
present in a rock.
• Permeability is a measure of the capacity of a rock
for transmitting fluid and it is dependent on effective
porosity and the mean size of the individual pore
spaces. It has a direct bearing on the amount of fluid
that can be recovered.

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


36
Sample Description Format

• Rock type / Classification


• Color
• Texture: Cuttings shape and parting (calcareous and
argillaceous lithologies), Grain size, Grain shape or
roundness, Sorting, Hardness or induration, Luster / Slaking /
Swelling
• Cementation or matrix
• Fossils and accessories
• Visual structures
• Visual porosity
• Oil show descriptions

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


37
Particle Shape: Roundness vs. Sphericity

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


38
Sorting

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


39
Oil Show Evaluation

• Solid Hydrocarbons and Dead Oil


• Oil show description
• Hydrocarbon Odor
• Oil Staining
• Natural Fluorescence
• Solvent Cut Fluorescence
• Other Tests

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


40
Sample Examination Procedure For HC Shows

• Take a mud sample, aside from the regular sample


or bottoms up sample, when there are significant
gas shows. If a significant gas peak arrives in
between sampling intervals, a spot sample is
caught along with a mud sample.
• Pour mud sample into a shallow dish and observe
under UV light. If nothing is seen, water is added to
the mud and the mixture is stirred. Again the
sample is observed under UV light.

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


41
Sample Examination Procedure For HC Shows

• The unwashed sample is also observed under UV


light.
• For the lithological samples, smell the sample first
before observing it under the microscope. Observe
sample under microscope for staining / bleeding.
• Place some oil-stained cuttings, if any, into some of
the depressions on the spot plate. Observe under
microscope.

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


42
Sample Examination Procedure For HC Shows

• Observe sample tray under UV light. Separate


some fluorescing grains and place them in the spot
plate.
• Observe the grains that have been selected in Step
6 under the microscope for stains/bleeding.
• Use the Solvent Cut Test on the samples in the
spot plate. Observe under UV light.
• Observe cutting samples in plain light.
• Observe the residue.

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


43
Observing a Sample Under the UV Box

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


44
Order of Oil Show Description

• Free oil in mud: amount, intensity and color


• Petroliferous odor: type and strength
• Visible oil staining/bleeding: distribution, intensity and
color
• Sample Fluorescence: percentage, intensity, color
• Solvent cut: speed, character, intensity and color
• Cut color and intensity
• Cut residue (intensity and color)

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


45
Bleeding Core Sample

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


46
Fluorescence: Indication of API Gravity

Gravity (API) Color at 3600A

< 15 Brown

15 - 25 Orange

25 - 35 Yellow to Green

35 - 45 White

> 45 Blue White to Violet

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


47
Mineral Fluorescence

Rock Type Fluorescence Color


Dolomite, Sandy Limestone yellow, yellowish brown

Some Limestones (magnesian) brown

Chalk, chalky limestones purple


Paper Shale yellow to coffee brown, greyish

Fossils yellow-white to yellow-brown

Marl, Clay Marl yellowish to brownish grey


Anhydrite grey brown, greyish, blue

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


48
Solvent Cut or “Wet Cut” Test

• The speed in which the solvent cut occurs yields


useful info
• If the suspected cutting will not initially cut, the test
can be repeated. Samples can be dried, crushed or
have diluted HCl applied to it
• The residue oil that remains in the spot plate is the
oil’s natural color
• Be careful not to get the cutting agent into the rubber
of the dropper as it might “contaminate” the solvent by
giving it a pale yellowish fluorescence

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


49
How To Do A Solvent Cut Test

• Place a few drops of solvent, enough to immerse


the sample, on the sample in the depression in the
spot plate or the test tube.
• Observe the following:
– Cut speed
– Cut nature
– Cut color fluorescence and intensity
– Cut color intensity
– Residue color and intensity

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


50
Summary

• Lack of visible stain is not conclusive proof of the


absence of hydrocarbons
• Lack of fluorescence is not conclusive proof of the
absence of hydrocarbons
• Hydrocarbon shows will usually give a positive cut
fluorescence (wet cut). High gravity hydrocarbons will
often give a positive cut fluorescence and/or a
residual cut, but will give negative results with all other
hydrocarbon detection methods. Minerals which
fluoresce will not yield a cut.

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


51
Responsibilities of a Mud Logger

• To collect and record all the engineering and


geological data obtained while drilling
• To interpret the acquired data
• To inform the client of significant changes in the well
• Maintain good relations with the client and other
personnel on the rig
• Ensure that the unit and equipment are properly
maintained and in good working order
• To perform all duties in a safe manner

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


52
THE END

© 2007 Weatherford. All rights reserved.


53

You might also like