Jessel Marian P. Abraham Time/Schedule: Sat. 8-11:00 am
Professor: Rommel Alcantara 1. What is your position/opinion about it? (Republic Act No. 9344 “Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006” - The bill would only discriminate against less fortunate kids- a deeper symptom of a disturbing societal condition in the country. Children’s mind are not yet fully developed and are not able to fully discern consequences of their actions. Citing studies “adolescent‘s brain function reach maturity only at 16 years old, affecting their reasoning abilities and impulse control”. If the bill is passed into law, social workers have another issue to deal with- the possibility of mixing younger children with teenagers who have committed more serious crimes. For me, I am really against it especially when they there’s many to turn over the children. I also pity those 9 years old and above who will be mixed in detention with those 15 to 17 years old with criminal cases. The older children tend to physically and sexually abuse the younger one I think. What is the best age that the child can be held criminally liable? For my own opinion it is 16 years old and above because that’s the time when adolescent brain function reach mature. In fact lowering the age of criminal liability would be disadvantages to the poor. Given the current state of the justice system in the country, the bill risks victimizing the poor, among whom most offending minors come from primarily because of need. These families’ means barely cover their needs, let alone hiring a lawyer. While poverty is not an excuse to commit crime, there ought to be a clear distinction between making the children responsible for their acts and criminalizing them. There is a bigger picture surrounding juvenile crime which is usually left out of the discourse. The problem of children in conflict with the law is deeply rooted in the social ills of the country-increasing inequality paired with decreasing support for social services such as healthcare and education. These problems will require more holistic and nuanced solutions rather than simply lowering the age of criminal liability. What are the possible effect of this law to the development of the child? - For me, it will only scar children and adversely affect their future 2. “Electricity is not only present in a magnificent thunderstorm…. - Electricity is not only present in a magnificent thunderstorm and dazzling lightning, but also in a lamp; so also, creativity exists not only where it creates great historical works, but also everywhere human imagination combines, changes, and creates anything new. “The teacher must adopt the role of facilitator not content provider” - A facilitator is the person who assists a group of people in grasping at their common targets and in achieving them without any intervention on his or her behalf. Therefore, when we say the teacher has to play the role of a facilitator in the classroom, this means that the teacher should not be the king who controls the activities of the learners. He/she should grant the learners some space to let the spirits of creativity and innovation. In other words, the learners must get involved into an active participation that would be involved into an active participation that would be represented in argumentative discussions and teamwork activities, so that the process of learning become comprehensive, Not a content provider who supplies information or answers to the questions in an activities that the student itself must answer it in their own. 3. If you will become a teacher, how will you apply the theory of Lev Vygotsky during the teaching learning process? Make a particular example about it. - Vygotsky’s concept of the zone of proximal development is based on the idea that development is defined both by what a child can do independently and by what the child can do when assisted by an adult or more competent peer. Knowing both levels of Vygotsky’s zone is useful for teachers, for these levels indicate where the child is at a given moment as well as where the child is going. The zone of proximal development has several implications for teaching in the classroom. According to Vygotsky, for the curriculum to be developmentally appropriate, As a future teacher, I will plan activities that encompasses not only what child are capable of doing on their own but what they can learn with the help of others. Vygotsky’s theory does not mean that anything can be taught to any child. Only instruction and activities that fall within the zone promote development. For example, if a child cannot identify the sounds in a word even after many prompts, the child may not benefit immediately from instruction in this skill. Practice of previously known skills and instruction of concepts that are too difficult and complex have little positive impact. I will use information about both levels of Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development in organizing classroom activities.