File No..29, Brajesh Chandra Verma v. State of UP.

Issue : Whether HC was justified in dismissing the writ petition of Petitioner providing the wrong information about
the appointment as Home guard. ?

1. Facts : The petitioner has applied for the post of constable in UP, Vishesh Parikshtra Vahini.(only trained home
guard were allowed) in 2010. He got selected and and appointment letter was issued to him and was asked to go
to Lucknow for joining.
2. When he reached there he was not allowed to join and was informed that his name was not there and can make
enquiries from office of Director General of Police, UP.
3. He was informed that he has wrongly mention the date of his appointment and got marks for the period in
which he was not in service hence he is ineligible for the selection. Aggrived by this he appeal to HC,which was
rejected and hence SLP.

Order of Single judge, High Court of Allahabad [23.4.2015] [pg 45-48]

The judge recorded that the petitioner has not actually worked as home guard for the period between 26th
November,1999 to 21st january,2008. (8years and 3 month). For the wrong information provided by petitioner he
was awarded marks for the period of between 26th november, 1999 to 21st january 2008.If the marks for such period
is excluded then we would have got only 17 marks and would have not been entitle for the selecton. So order of
office of Director General of Police was correct.

Impugned Judgment,Division Bench, High court of Allahabad.[26.09.2016]

Upheld the judgment of single judge and there is no illegality in the judgment and dismiss the appeal of petitioner.

Prayer [pg 9]
Order of Director general of police [pg 20]