7
T
‘Impaired Gas Exchange
-Nimbex to decrease 02
demand on vital organs
-Epoprostenol continuous +
‘through vent (nebulization)
Partially comp. resp. acidosis
-ABG upon admission-
pH: 7.26, CO2: 68, HCO3: 30
-Dx of pneumonia
-ETT/ OG/Ventilator: A/C,
PEEP = 30, Fi02 = 80%,
TV = 300ml, Rate = 35,
-Rotoprone bed utilized
Pulmonary fibrosis/ARDS
Bilateral DVT and PE’s
a
Decreased Cardiac
Output
-Levophed 2m contin
-Fsmolol 3imV/ar contin
“MAP
“BP: 103-57
-Dx of acute kidney injury
‘minimal urine output during
shift (415ml)
-Hypoactive bowel sounds
x
-Nimbex (paralytic) ordered
to decrease 02 demand
= Pneumonia
= +Rhinovius
“Levaquin Q48H ordered
~-Maxipime Q12H ordered
“Temporature range 99.1-
100.9 day of eae
-WBC 300 (lobular
‘pneumonia; glucose = 211
‘Reason for Needin;
Health Care:
Acute Respiratory Distress
‘Syndrome (due to rhinovirus)
7B y.o. Female
NKA — Full code
Key assessment: Respiratory
Jamie Giambattista 1
a
‘Excess Fluid Volume rit
Acute Renal Failure
-Frothy pink sputum
CXR: possible pleural effusion
-24hr fluid bal = +1259m1
-Creatinine = 13; BUN = 80
“Mg = 27; K = 638; Na= 132
-BNP = 1975 (CHF)
-RBC = 2.85; Hab= 89;
Het = 27.1 (hemodilution)
Bilateral lower extremity 3+
pitting edema; facial edema;
periorbital edema present (patient
prone)
“CYP = 17mmHg
-Fcho showing severe pulm, HTN
Imbalanced Nutrition:
‘Less than body
‘requirements
Pertinent lab values
‘Albums
Total protein
Patient NPO
TF via OG tube: 10mi/nr
-Long term bedrest
4
6
Impaired Verbal 7 Impaired Skin Integrity (o Ineffective Family §
‘Communication -Rotoprone bed being utilized Coping
Imm ETT tube at -Intubated/sedated/paralyzed (ETT, Husband unaware of all
22cqn lip line Propofol, Peredex. Nimbex) details of wife's current
“Sedated -Diaphoretic patient status
“Paralyzed -Multiple IV lines: CVC triple lumen -Overall uncertain diagnosis
-Rotoprone bed R subclavian, arterial line L radial, Husband not on board with
“Facial edema CVC triple lumen R femoral palliative care after recent
-Drv oral mucosa -Micotin powder Q12H b/w pt folds PEA
-Q2H ms:
-Self-adhesive dressings applied 10
ankles, anterior foot, entire abdomen,
under breasts, and on upper chest to
protect and prevent further
breakdown while prone
eo
P. Scllugte}, Concept Mapping: A Critical Thinking Approach, Davis, 2002\
g
-
Jamie Giambattista 2
Problem # 1: Impaired Gas Exchange
General Goal: Increased Gas Exchange
Predicted Behavioral Outcome Objective: The patient will maintain an SPO2 of >95% with,
signs of improvement (ABGs trending back to normal limits) on the day of care.
‘Nursing Interventions
1. Assess breath sounds Q2H
Patient Responses
1, Bilateral U lobes = clear, symmetrical
Bilateral L lobes = diminished, symmetrical
2. Monitor SPO2 2. SPO2 remains 98-100% while prone =
3. Check ABGs | 3. 9/9: pH. 7.26, CO2: 68, HCO3: 30 eo LAT
6 ‘9/14: pCR) CO2: 60.4, HCO3: 2736p
VY 7 (partially comp. resp. acidosis for both)
4, Review chest x-rays _/ 49/13: mild bibasilar consolidation, possible
pleural effusions, no pneumothorax
5. Monitor ventilator settings 5. AIC, PEEP: 30, FiO2: 80%, TV: 300, R: 35
Patient continues to sat 98% during shift
6. Administer Solu-Medrol 40mg IV Q6H 6. Breath sounds clear bilaterally
7. Maintain patient prone and in Trendelenburg) 7. Patient continues to sat 98% during shift
8. Suction/mouth care PRN 8. Oral mucosa dry; pink frothy sputum present 4 Clessi—-
‘Sga
Peet
Evaluation of outcome objectives: Patient continued to sat 98% and ABGs showing a trend tee
“MET
Problem #2: Decreased Cardiac Output,
General Goal: Maintain Stable MAP
Predicted Behavioral Outcome Objective: The patient will maintain a MAP of >65 on the
day of care.
‘Nursing Interventions Patient Responses
1. Check echocardiogram results 1. 9/10: severely dilated R ventricle, moderate
tricuspid regurgitation, severe pulm, HTN
Smale LeveHV-runningtoRfemFEC AP=71
‘Wave dampened; arterial line positional
BP; 103/57, MAP: 71, P: 79, RR: 35, T: 99.1
412-4mi*hr-was rumning-tntil heparin was DIC p77
2. Titrate Levophed 16mg/250m! per order (2.
3. Maintain arterial line 3
4. Monitor vital signs 4
gat
wv, o 5. Titrate heparin 25,000U/250ml per order 5.
e
fo 6 Monitor aPTT values 6
(07 7. Titeate Nimbex 20mg/100ml per order 7
8. Check ECG or patient 8
overall due to +GIB (gastrointestinal bleed)
9/13: 66.7 (HIGH), 9/14: 22.4 (WNL) Ps
6-2mb¢he-Nimbex running to Rfenr TEE, BIS, gs") 9e-!*
conincs tobe nanned cad ~ #2 *iapoe
Patient in NSR, with HR <100
Evaluation of outcome objectives: MAP averagi
help of the paralytic and Levophed, (MET)
P. Schuster, Concept Mapping: A Critical Thinking
ing at 79 during my shift today, with the
ik
Approach, Davis, 2002.snahce! OF Jamie Giambatisia 3
WA
Problem #3:Jatection- Hyperthermia F 7eckion
General Goal: Improve the Status of Current Underlying Infection(s)
Predicted Behavioral Outcome Objective: The patient will maintain a temperature of <100
and WBC <10,000 on the day of care
‘Nursing Interventions Patient Responses
1. Monitor WBC levels 1. 9/13: 34,800, 9/14: 37,300 (trending upwards)
2. Asses for REEDA (S/S infection) 2. Skin warm with ecchymosis; 3+ pitting
edema BLE; breakdown on skinfolds
3. Obtain temperature Q4H 3. Temperature range during si=99.1-1009
4-Administer antibiotics as ordered 4 i FS0mg/TSOml QaRH @-1OOmIthr Zlob
Lesagom er eoipios Maxipime 2a TVPB ¢ eT
prior day 7AM agave
5. Assess clarity of urine output 5. Sediment noted in urine output
6. Utilize Chlorhexadine in mouth care kit 6. VAP-protocol; patient’s lung sounds are clear
(VA? Retecad\, bilaterally; sputum collected during
suctioning was pink and frothy
7. Disinfect IV hubs prior to any medications 7/8: NoREEDA noted during assessment,
ongoing temperature and elevated WBC count
8. Good hand hygeine prior to patient care
Evaluation of outcome objectives: Patient’s temperature ranged from.99.1@100,9 during,
‘my shift, WBC continued to be elevated (37,300). (PARTIALLY-MET; CONTINUE)
eee? wey
Problem #4: Excess Fluid HA Oe
General Goal: Fluid Volume Balance oma OY
Predicted Behavioral Outcome Objective: The patient will have a 6-hour net 1/0 within
100ml on the day of care.
‘Nursing Interventions Patient Responses
1. Monitor electrolytes (*Na/K*) 1. Na= 132, K=6.8 (AKI and fluid overload)
2. Assess BP and overall edema 2. BP: 103/57, Edema: 3+ pitting edema
go bilateral lower extremes, facial edema;
bilateral periorbital edema
3. Assess urine color, quantity, clarity 3. Total 6-hour output = 415 ml; concentrated
yellow, sediment present
4, Administer Albumin 25g 1V Q6H 4. 9/14 albumin levels = 3.4 (improving)
5, Monitor 1/0’s of patient 5. 24 hour /O net = +1259ml
6. Assess lung sounds for fluid overload 6. Lung sounds clear bilaterally
7. Monitor serum calcium levels 7. 9/13: 78, 9/14: 8.5 (Albumin administered)
Evaluation of outcome objectives: Patient’s net VO during my 6-hour shift was +44ml
(= 459ml, O = 415 ml) (MET)
P, Schuster, Concept Mapping: A Critical Thinking Approach, Davis, 2002