You are on page 1of 4
Republic of the Philippines. REGIONAL TRIAL COURT Fourth Judicial Region Branch 12, Lipa City MAYA ANGELOU M. PEREZ, Civil Case No. CV-2015-24 Plainuft, For: Collection of Sum of -versus- ‘Money with Damages HAZEL ANNE M. MANALO, Defendant. ANSWER DEFENDANT HAZEL ANNE M. MANALO, by undersigned counsel, unto this Honorable Court most respectfully states that: 1. Paragraphs one (1) and two (2) of the Complaint are admitted: Paragraphs three (3) to five (5) of the Complaint are denied for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief ax to the veracity or falsity thereof. the allegations therein being matters known only to and are within the control only of the plaintiff: Paragraph six (6) of the Complaint is denied insofar as it alleges that the defendant ewes the plaintiff a sum of moncy and fails to pay the same, the truth being those alleged in the special and affirmative defenses part hereinbelow: SPECIAL AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES ‘On May 25, 2015, the Defendant and the Plaintiff did not see each other becattse the lormer was having a vacation in Baguio City as evidenced by the photocopy of entry/exit of vehicles monitoring sheet, attached herein, marked as Annex “A’, and made an integral part hereto. Such monitoring sheet is issued by the Gate Security Department of the Subdivision where the Defendant resides, Pagel REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION REGIONAL TRIAL COURT BRANCH __ CITY OF MANILA Janice Alberto Arceo, Petitioner, versus: Civil Case No. For: Declaration of Nullity fof Marriage under Art, 36 of Family Code Rhoicland Mantomingeal Arceo, Respondent, PETITION COMES NOW petitioner, through the undersigned counsel and to this Honorable Court, respectfully alleges! 1, That petitioner Janice Alberto Arcen is of legal age. married, Pilipino and resident of 1473 G. Masangay St., Sta Cruz, Manila: 2. That respondent Rhoicland Arceo is likewise of legal age. married, Filipino and presently residing at 1473 G. Masangkay St, Sta Cruz, Manila; 3, That petitioner and respondent eclebrated their marriage on December 28, 2003 before the Parish Church of San Agustin, Manila, certified true copy of their Marriage Certificate is attached and made integral part hereof as Annex "A": 4, That petitioner and respondent have two child, They have no written agreement executed before the marriage to govern their property relations nor have any community property acquired during their marriage. They have no debts: 5. That petitioner met the respondent sometime in 1998 in City of Manila, Their romance culminated in a marriage belore the priest of San Agustin chureh;

You might also like