Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit IV - Marker Assisted Back Crossing
Unit IV - Marker Assisted Back Crossing
(MABC)
Marker A Marker B
Using markers A and B:
QTL
5 cM 5 cM 1 - 2 rArB = ~99.5%
• Using a pair of flanking markers can greatly improve reliability but increases time
and cost
Markers must be polymorphic
RM84 RM296
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
P1 P2
P1 P2
P1 x P2
Recipient Donor
F1
large populations consisting of thousands
F2 of plants
PHENOTYPIC SELECTION
P1 x P2
Susceptible Resistant
F1
LINKED DONOR
GENES
TARGET c TARGET
LOCUS
LOCUS
RECURRENT PARENT
CHROMOSOME
DONOR CHROMOSOME
• Markers can be used to greatly minimize the amount of donor
chromosome….but how?
Conventional backcrossing
TARGET
GENE c c
TARGET
GENE
c
F1 BC1 BC2
MAS BREEDING SCHEMES
1. Marker-assisted backcrossing
2. Pyramiding
3. Early generation selection
4. ‘Combined’ approaches
Marker-assisted backcrossing (MAB)
• MAB has several advantages over conventional
backcrossing:
– Effective selection of target loci
– Minimize linkage drag
– Accelerated recovery of recurrent parent
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Target
locus
FOREGROUND
BACKGROUND SELECTION
SELECTION
Pyramiding
• Widely used for combining multiple disease
resistance genes for specific races of a
pathogen
• Pyramiding is extremely difficult to achieve using
conventional methods
– Consider: phenotyping a single plant for multiple
forms of seedling resistance – almost impossible
F1
F2
Line number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Phenotype Race 1 R S R R S R R S R R R R S R R R R R S R
Phenotype Race 2 S R S R R R R S R S R R R R R S S R R R
P1 P2 F1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
MARKER 1 R1
S
P1 P2 F1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
R2
MARKER 2
S