Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 The Effectiveness of Using Role-Play To Improve ST
1 The Effectiveness of Using Role-Play To Improve ST
Alek Andika
Universitas Maárif Nahdatul Ulama Kebumen
Abstract:
The research was pointed to progress the students’ speaking abilities of the
tenth of SMA Negeri 1 Pejagoan by actualizing the role-play technique. It
was carried out based on the strategy that had been arranged some time
recently. The observation was action research. It was conducted in three
cycles with one assembly in the to begin with cycle and 2 gatherings in the
moment and third cycle. The subjects of this inquire about were 32
students of lesson tenth grade at SMA Negeri 1 Pejagoan. The subjective
information were collected by watching the educating and learning handle,
and meeting the students, the instructor and the collaborators. The
information were in the shape of field notes, meet transcripts, and photos.
In the interim, the quantitative information were collected through
evaluating the students’ speaking execution by comparing the implies of
the pretest and post test. The information were the students’ speaking
ability. The strategy of the inquire about comprised of surveillance,
arranging, acting, and reflecting. The comes about of this inquire about
appeared that the utilize of Part Playing procedure was effective to move
forward the students’ talking capacity. Based on the subjective
information, the utilize of classroom English made a difference the
understudies to be more recognizable with English. The lexicon and
elocution hones and part play exhibitions too made a difference them to
improve their lexicon information and construct their exactness.
Key words: role play technique, improving, speaking skill, student
13
Volume 6, Number 1, Februari 2015 Alek Andika
subjects for senior secondary school have enough chance to hone their
which have four noteworthy dialect talking admirably. The less extent of
aptitudes that ought to be aced by getting the hang of talking influences
understudies amid their time of understudies to consider the talking
learning in school. There are tuning in, aptitude as the most troublesome and
talking, perusing and composing. testing expertise to learn.
Talking is one of the four dialect
abilities that is vital in human life. In light of the scientist's perception
Through talking, numerous individuals and furthermore showing practicum
can convey each other. As per and showing knowledge in the tenth
Cameron (2001:40), talking can be grade understudies, there were a few
characterized as a dynamic utilization issues in educating picking up talking.
of dialect to express significance with The issues were; the understudies were
the goal that other individuals can get bashful and absence of certainty. At
it. Talking happens when a speaker the point when the educator requesting
utilizes a dialect effectively to express that they showcase a discussion before
and convey importance keeping in the class, they were as yet modest and
mind the end goal to collaborate with hesitant to do what they were
the audience. It implies that, speakers requested to do. The majority of the
can utilize dialect effectively to understudies said that they were
interface with the audience members. hesitant to misspeak words and had
low inspiration on testing themselves.
Getting the hang of talking is still in Another issue amid the lesson was, the
less extent in light of the fact that in vast majority of the understudies
examinations, the spotlights are stalled out and did not comprehend
generally on the two abilities: the what they needed to state. As the
perusing expertise and composing outcome, the class turned out to be less
aptitude. Besides, the learning open since they like to stay noiseless.
procedure is ruled by those two At the point when the specialist asked
abilities though understudies bargain the understudies for what good reason
more with correspondence movement did they stay noiseless, the greater part
in their lives. Consequently, they don't of them said that they didn't know how
14
Volume 6, Number 1, Februari 2015 Alek Andika
15
Volume 6, Number 1, Februari 2015 Alek Andika
16
Volume 6, Number 1, Februari 2015 Alek Andika
17
Volume 6, Number 1, Februari 2015 Alek Andika
exchange over, the pretend system can the class and executed the learning
be connected as a method to enable the they as of now had. For sure, it helped
understudies to enhance their talking them enhance their talking. In the
abilities. The execution of the pretend wake of being acquainted with talking
method was joined with different exercises, the understudies appeared to
activities, i.e. utilizing classroom have better execution in talking. It was
English amid or toward the finish of simpler for them to discover thoughts
educating and learning process, giving to talk than previously.
criticism on the understudies' The implementation was conducted in
exhibitions, giving day by day two cycles. Based on the reflection of
freebees with another subjects, Cycle 1, the students’ improvement
intriguing adjusted English materials, had not covered all aspects of
asking the understudies to dependably speaking. Their comprehension,
have word references with them, vocabulary building, and
utilizing different media or fun pronunciation improved but still low.
exercises in showing new dialect, Some students have improved their
giving classroom English guidelines, pronunciation but others haven’t. The
giving a few inputs amid or toward the findings also showed that the students
finish of instructing and learning still were shy and nervous to have a
process, and welcoming the role play with their friends in front of
understudies in rivalry among groups the class. However, they had not
to answer inquiries toward the finish shown great improvement on fluency.
of the lesson. Moreover, another problem emerged
during the cycle, i.e. the students’
The point of these activities was to grammar accuracy had not been
enhance understudies' certainty, achieved. Cycle 2 was directed to
understanding, familiarity, elocution, solve problems that emerged in the
vocabulary and sentence structure. It previous cycle as well as to improve
was additionally meant to lead the the speaking factors that were still low.
understudies to have all the more In this cycle, the use of role play as an
talking rehearses, furnish them with activity in the teaching and learning
more chances to apply the talking in process was well in improving the
18
Volume 6, Number 1, Februari 2015 Alek Andika
students’ confidence to speak English. 65.5. From the pre-test only three
Day by day, they were able to deliver a students who passed the KKM (70)
good dialogue with appropriate and there are twenty nine students who
expressions and intonation. As they get the score below the KKM. From
worked together with their friends in the result in the pre-test, the researcher
making and practicing the dialogue, conducted the cycle 1. The score in
they helped each other to improve cycle 1 after the action was 72.00. The
their speaking skills. In this cycle, students who passed the KKM were
their participation in the teaching and seven students and there were twenty
learning process improved five students who were below the
significantly. KKM. The score in cycle 1 showed
The speaking skill in the cycle 2 was that the improvement of students’
increased but the improvement is still speaking skill still low. So, the
low. Although the improvement in the researcher did cycle 2 in order to know
cycle 2 was better than cycle 1, the the improvement of the students
researcher also conducted cycle 3 to speaking ability. The score of the
solve problems that emerged in the students in cycle 2 is 79.02. There
previous cycle. In cycle 3, the students were not students who did not pass the
were more confident in role playing KKM. All students passed the KKM, it
with their dialogue. They were busy to showed that there were an
create their dialogue be a good improvement students’ speaking skill
dialogue. And they also planned to use in the cycle 2. The researcher thought
their good performance. In cycle III, that the score in the cycle 2 still low,
the students were more creative than so the researcher conducted action
cycle I and II. They more focused in research in cycle 3 to get the better
doing speaking activities. They more result in improving the students’
enjoyed their role play activity. speaking score and skill than the
The result of the research before the previous cycle. In cycle 3, the mean
implementation of the role play score of the students were 89.9. There
technique, the researcher got the data were not students get average score 70.
from the result of pre-test. The mean It showed that all students passed the
score of the class before the action was KKM, so it has met a criterion of the
19
Volume 6, Number 1, Februari 2015 Alek Andika
action success. To support this result Media such as video and recording
of this research, the researcher did a that implemented in the teaching
post-test. The score of post-test was learning process of English. The
89.1. It showed that all students got a students also can know how to say in a
score above the average score of the good pronounce like a foreign. The
KKM (70). Based on the discussion video and recording help the students
above, the role-play technique can be to improve their speaking in
implemented as a technique to help the pronounce aspect and students also
students improve their speaking skills. know the express that the foreign use
in speaking.
Conclusion
Based on the discoveries, it can be
concluded that there was improvement References
in the students’ speaking skills after Arikunto, Suharsini. 2006. Prosedur
the applying of the actions. The Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan
conclusions of the observation can be Praktik.Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
concluded as follows; 1. The students
had better speaking skills after having Burns, A.1999. Collaborative Action
role plays as one of the activities in the Research for English Language
20
Volume 6, Number 1, Februari 2015 Alek Andika
21