Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Structural Analysis and Design of Process Equipment PDF
Structural Analysis and Design of Process Equipment PDF
STRUCTURAL
E ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
OF PROCESS EQUIPMENT
--1t. . E
,';i::::
-.r,..-'-;;,r&.
Mqon H. Jowod
Nooter Corporation
St. Louis, M issouri
-
E
Jomes R. Fqrr
t
- Babcock & Wilco.r Company
Barberton, Ohio
7 A Wiley-lnterscience Publicqtion
JOHN WILEY & SONS
I .r/C* N*w York Chichester Brisbone Toronto Singopore
To Our Wives,
Dixie and Barbara
\ \\ '1, r I i, | ,
', 'r, ' 1,, I lr,.rlr"rr
| 1",1, l,rl,lr,,fr,r|l'r., .rrrl rirtl.\
',
I ( lrcr)rcrl t,hnts lilLrrl)rrrcrn :trrl s(ri)l)lr(5 l)esirn
arrl conslroction L Farr. James R ll. lrllc
'tPr55.5.J.14 lq8l 660.2'83 83 12475
lslJN (, .171 (lt).)07 x
l,riIl.rl r!r rln | "rr,al \rlrr'\ lrl America
l09lJ/r)'il1 |
PREFACE
We wrote this book to serve three purposes. The first purpose is to provide
structural and mechanical engineers associated with the petrochemical industry
a reference book for the analysis and design of process equipment. The second
is to give graduate engineering students a concise introduction to the theory of
plates and shells and its industrial applications, The third purpose is to aid
process engineers in understanding the background of some of the design equa-
tions in the ASME Boiler and hessure Vessel Code. Section VIII.
The topics presented are separated into four parts. Part 1 is intended to
familiarize the designer with some of the common "tools of the hade." Chapter
I details the history ofpressure vessels and various applicable codes from around
the world. Chapter 2 discusses design specifications furnished in purchasing
process equipment as well as in various applicable codes. Chapter 3 establishes
the strength criteria used in different codes and the theoretical background
needed in developing design equations in subsequent chapters. Chapter 4 in-
cludes different materials of construction and toughness considerations.
Part 2 is divided into three chapters outlining the basic theory of plates and
shells. Chapter 5 develops the membrane and bending theories of cylindrical
shells. Chapter 6 discusses various approximate theories for analyzing heads and
transition sections, and Chapter 7 derives the equations for circular and rectan-
gular plates subjected to various loading and support conditions. These three
chapters form the basis from which most of the design equations are derived in
the other chapters.
Part 3, which consists of flve chapters, details the design and analysis of
components. Chapters 8 and 9 derive the design equations established by the
ASME Code, VI[-l and -2, for cylindrical shells as well as heads and transition
sections. Chapter 10 discusses gaskets, bolts, and flange design. Chapter ll
presents openings and their reinforcement; Chapter l2 develops design equations
tor support systems.
Part 4 outlines the design and analysisof some specialized process equipment.
Chapter 13 describes the design of flat bottom tanks; Chapter 14 derives the
ftitAct
cquations for analyzing hest transfer equipment. Chapter l5 describes the theory
of thick cylindrical shells in high-pressure applications. Chapter l6 discusses the
stress analysis of tall vessels. Chapter 17 outlines the procedure of the ASME
Code, VI[-l, for designing rectangular presswe vessels.
To simplify the use of this book as a reference, each chapter is written so that
it stands on its own as much as possible. Thus, each chapter with design or other
mathematical equations is written using terminology frequently used in industry
for that particular type of equipment or component discussed in the pertinent
chapter. Accordingly, a summary of nomenclature appears at the end of most of
the chapters in which mathematical expressions are given.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
In using this book as a textbook for plates and shells, Chapters 3, 5,6 md7
form the basis for establishing the basic theory. Instructors can select other
chapters to supplement the theory according to the background and needs of the
graduate engineer.
We are indebted to many people and organizations for their help in preparing this
In deriving the background of some of the equations given in the ASME
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, attention was focused on Section VIII, Di- book. A special thanks is given to the Nooter Corporation for generous support
visions 1 and 2. Although these same equations do occur in other sections of the rluring the preparation of the manuscript. Also a special thanks is given to the
ASME Code, such as the Power and Heating Boilers, no consideration is given American Society of Mechanical Engineers for supplying many of the illustra-
in this book regarding other sections unless specifically stated' tions used in this book and also to the American Petroleum Institute and the
Tubular Exchangers Manufacturers Association.
MAAN JAWAD We also give thanks to Messrs. W. D. Doty, G. Hays, G. G. Karcher, T. W.
JAMES FARR [,odes, H. S. Olinger, and R. F. O'Neill for reviewing the manuscript, and to
Saint Louit, Missouri Mr. W. H. Schawacker for supplying many of the photographs.
Barberton, Ohio We would also like to extend our appreciation to Mrs' Y. Batteast for typing
September 1983 portions of the manuscript.
M. J.
CONTENTS
2.7 Dcsign Data tbr Ncw Materials 't7 4.5.2 'l'heory ol' Brittle Fracture 70
2.8 Factors of Safety 17 4.5.3 Hydrostatic Testing 74
2.9 Allowable Tensile Stresses in the ASME Code t7 4.5.4 Factors Influencing Brittle Fracture 75
2.10 Allowable Extemal Pressure Stress and Axial 4.6 Hydrogen Embrittlement 76
Compressive Stress in the ASME Boiler and Pres- 4.7 Nonmetallic Vessels 77
sure Vessel Code l9 References 78
2.11 Allowable Stresses in the ASME Code for Pressure
Bibliography 79
Piping B31 22
2.12 Allowable Stress in Other Codes of the World 22
References 26 PART 2 ANAIYSIS OF COMPONENTS 8l
Chopter 3 Strength Theories, Design Criierio, ond Chopfer 5 Slress in Cylindricol Shells 83
Design Equotions 29 5.1 Stress Due to Intemal Pressure 84
3.1 Strength Theories 30 5.2 Discontinuity Analysis 92
3.2 Design Criteria 3l 5.2.1 Long Cylinders 96
3.3 Design Equations 33 5.2.2 Short Cylinders lO7
3.4 Stress-Strain Relationships 33 5.3 Buckling of Cylindrical Shells I 14
3.5 Strain-Defl ection Equations 35 5.3.1 Uniform Pressure Applied to Sides Only 114
3.6 Force-Stress Expressions 39 5.3.2 Uniform Pressure Applied to Sides and
References 42 Ends 116
Bibliography 43
5.3.3 Pressure on Ends Only lr8
5.4 Thermal Stress 119
Chopter 4 Moteriqls of Construction 45
5.4.1 Uniform Change in Temperature 124
5.4.2 Gradient in Axial Direchon 127
4.1 Material Selection 46
5.4.3 Gradient in Radial Direction r30
4,l.l Corrosion 46 Nomenclature 137
4.1.2 Strength 49 References r38
4. 1 .3
Material Cost 52
Bibliography 139
4.2 Nonferrous Alloys 53
4.2.1 Aluminum Alloys 53
4.2.2 Copper and Copper Alloys 3J Chopter 6 Anolysis of Formed Heods ond Tronsition
4.2.3 Nickel and High-Nickel Alloys 56 Sections 141
4.2,4 Titanfum and Zirconium Alloys 56 6. I Hemispherical Heads 142
4.3 Ferrous Alloys 60 I
6.1 . Various Loading Conditions 146
4.4 Heat Treating of Steels 6l 6.1.2 Discontinuity Analysis r52
4.5 Brittle Fracture 63 6.1.3 Thermal Stress 158
4.5. I ASME Presssure Vessel Criteria 68 6.1.4 Buckling Strength 159
CONTENTS xv
xiv CONTENTS
8.1 ASME Design Equations 206 10,4 Comparison of Theory and ASME Code Formula
for Circular Flat Heads and Covers without
8.2 Evaluation of Discontinuity Stresses 208
Bolting 278
8.3 ASME hocedure for Extemal Pressure Design 218
10,5 Bolted Flanged Connections 278
8.4 Design of Stiffening Rings 226
10.6 Contact Facings 279
8.5 Allowable Gaps in Stiffening Rings 23r
1O.7 Gaskets 281
8.6 Out-of-Roundness of Cylindrical Shells under
10.7.1 Rubber O-Rings 281
External Pressure 235
8.7 Design for Axial Compression 238 10.7.2 Metallic O- and C-Rings 281
Nomenclature 240
10.7.3 Compressed Asbestos Gaskets 282
Bibliography 241
10.7.5 Spiral-Wound Gaskets 285
CONTENTS CONTENTS xvii
1O.7.6 Jacketed Gaskets 285 I I.5 Ligament Efficiency of Openings in Shells 387
10.7.7 Metal Ring Gaskets 285 I 1.6 Fatieue Evaluation of Nozzles under Internal
10.7.8 High-Pressure Gaskets 285 Pressure 392
10.7.9 Lens Ring Gaskets 286 1t.7 Extemal Loadings 394
'10.7. I0
Delta Gaskets 287 11 .7.1
Local Stresses in the Shell or Head 394
10.7.1I Double-Cone Gaskets 288 I 1.7.2 Stresses in the Nozzle 407
I0.7. l2 Gasket Design 290 Nomenclature 415
10.8 Bolting Design 292 References 416
10.9 Blind Flanges 294 Bibliography 417
10. 10 Bolted Flanged Connections with Ring-Type
Gaskets 298 Chopter l2 Vessel Supports 421
l0.l I Reverse Flanges 307 12.1 Introduction 422
10. l2 Full-Face Gasket Flange 310 12.2 Skirt and Base Ring Design 423
10. l3 Flange Calculation Sheets 317 12.2.1 Anchor Chair Design 434
10, l4FlatFace Flange with Metal-to-Metal Contact 12.3 Design of Support Legs 438
Outside of the Bolt Circle 317 12.4 Lug-SupportedVessels 442
10.15 Spherically Dished Covers 324 12.5 Ring Girders 443
Nomenclature 330 12.6 Saddle Supports 449
References 332 Nomenclature 456
Bibliography 332 References 456
Bibliography 457
Chopter I I Openings, Nozzles, ond Externol
[oodings 335 PART 4 THEORY AND DESIGN OF SPECIAL
ll.l General 336 EQUIPMENT 459
I 1.2 Stresses and Loadings at Openings 338
I 1.3
'|
Theory of Reinforced Openings 343 Chopter l3 Flot Bottom Tonks 461
1.4 Reinforcement Limits 346 13.1 Introduction 462
I I .4.I Reinforcement Rules for ASME. 13.2 API 650 Tanks 462
Section I 349 13.2.1 Roof Design 462
I I .4.2 Reinforcement Rules for ASME,
13.2.2 Shell Design 470
Section VIII, Division I 359
13.2.3 Annular Plates 476
l l.4.3 Reinforcement Rules for ASME,
13.3 API 620 Tanks 482
Section VIII, Division 2 368
13.3. I Allowable Stress Criteria 487
II .4.4 Reinforcement Rules for ANSUASME
831. I 379 I 3.3.2 Compression Rings 490
I L4.5 Reinforcement Rules for ANSI/ASME 13.4 ANSI 896.1 Aluminum Tanks 496
83 t.3 383 13.4. I Design Rules 496
CONTENTS
xviii coNTENrs
498 I 6.3.2Dynamic Analysis from Wind Effects 577
13.5 AWWA Standard D100 16.4 Vessel Under Intemal Pressure Only
499 581
References
499 16.5 Vessel Under Internal Pressure and Extemal
BibliograPhY Loading 585
501 16,6 Vessel Under External Pressure Only 588
Chopter 14 Heql Tronsfer Equipmeni
502
16.7 Vessel Under External Pressure and External
- l4.l of Heat Exchangers
TYPes Loading 591
14.2 TEMA Design of Tubesheets in U-Tube 505
References 593
Exchangers Bibliography 593
Theoretical Analysis of Tubesheets
in U-Tube
14.3 508
Exchangers
Equations for
Chopter 17 Vessels of Noncirculor Cross Section 595
14.4 Background of the ASME Design
Tubesheets in U-Tube Exchangers
514 17,1 Types of Vessels 596
Theoretical Analysis of Fixed Tubesheets
519 17.2 Rules in Codes 601
14.5 523 17.3 Openings in Vessels with Noncircular Cross
14.6 TEMA Fixed Tubesheet Design
523 Section 601
l4'6'l Local Equivalent Pressure 527 17.4 Ligament Efficiency for Constant Diameter
l4'6'2 General Equivalent Pressure
Openings 601
14'6'3 Relationship Between Local and 17.5
533 Ligament Efficiency for Multidiameter Openings
Equivalent Pressure
537 Subject to Membrane Stress 603
14.7 ExPansion Joints
537 17,6 Ligament Efficiency for Multidiameter Openings
Nomenclature Subject to Bending Stress 606
538
References 17.7 Design Methods and Allowable Stresses 610
539
BibliograPhY 17.8 Basic Equations 612
17.9 Equations in the ASME Code, VIII-I 619
541
Chopfer 15 Vessels for High Pressure t7.to Design of Noncircular Vessels in Other Codes 626
541
15.l Basic Equations I 7. 10. I Method in Swedish Pressure Vessel
543 Code
15.2 Pres$essing of Solid Wall Vessels 627
547 I 7. 10.2 Design by Lloyd's Register of Shipping
15.3 Layered Vessels
15.4 Prestressing of Layered Vessels
558 Rules 630
Nomenclature
562 References 633
Biblio$aphY
563 Bibliography 633
Appendix L
Shells
Conversion Tables
689
698 BACKGROUND
INDEX AND BASIC
CONSIDERATIONS
CHAPTER
HISTORY AND
ORGANIZATION OF CODES
TIMERS [(lop) Courtesy Bobcock & Witcox Compony, (bol|or,) ( iuroly ,",r,,, , ,"r,,,,r,,,1
-OtD
2
-Y
'I'hroughout the world, the use of process equipment has expanded considerably.
ln the petroleum industry, process vessels are used at all stages of processing oil.
At the beginning of the cycle, they are used to store crude oil Many different
types of these vessels process the crude oil into oil and gasoline for the con-
surner. The vessels store petroleum at tank farms after processing and, finally,
scrvc to hold the gasoline in service stations fol the consumer's use. The use of
Droccss vessels in the chemical business is equally extensive. Process vessels are
uscd everywhere.
Prcssure vessels are made in all sizes and shapes. The smaller ones may be
no larger than a fraction of an inch in diameter, whereas the larger vessels may
be 150 ft or more in diameter. Some are buried in the ground or deep in the
occan; most are positioned on the ground or supported on platforms; and some
lctually are found in storage tanks and hydraulic units in aircraft
The internal pressure to which process equipment is designed is as varied as
thc size and shape. Intemal pressure may be as low as I in water gage pressure
to as high as 300,000 psi or more. The usual range of pressure for monoblock
construction is about 15 to about 5000 psi, although there are many vessels
designed for pressures below and above that range. The ASME Boiler and
Itcssure Code, Section VIII, Division t*, specifies a range of intemal pressure
liom 15 psi at the bottom to no upper limit; however, at an intemal pressure
abovc 3000 psi, the ASME Code, VIII-I, requires that special design consid-
crations may be necessary.r However, any pressure vessel that meets all the
rrquircrncnts of the ASME Codc. regardless of the intemal or external design
prcssuro. rnay slill bc acccptcd by thc authorized inspector and stamped by the
nrlrnrllclurcr with thc ASMI'l ('rxlc syrttbol. Some other pressure equlpment,
srrch as Al'l'' sl(nagc t Dks. rrriry bc dcsigned and contain no more intemal
pf('ssur( llriur lhitl gcncrirlc(l l)y lllc sllllic hcird of fluid contained in the tank.
llrt(,rt1lr llr( lrlr' lS(X):, ;rrrrl lrrtlv ltX)O\. (\l)losiotls in boilers and pressure
vcsscls rlcrc lr({tr{nt /\ lrrctrllx lrorlt t trplosiott tlrr thc Mississippi River
:,1{rlrlx);rt .\rtlt,ttt,t.t '\1rrrl .'/ lStr5. rcsttllctl itt thc boat's sinking within 20
nrnrt(.\,rr,l tlrrr|..rtlr,,l |')l)ilr,(,llr(r\JtoittlllrotrtcaliertheCivilWar.Thistype
r,l r rrtrr,,tr,rlrlrl r.trltttttr'rl un,rl)irl( (l rrrlo tlrc clrr'ly 1900s. In 1905, a destructive
, rlrl,,.r,,rr (,1 .r lr, lrlr( l!,rl(-r rrr ir sllrr'' lltellrly in Brockton, Massachusetts (Fig.
I l r. l rlllrl ''Il rr ,'r'l( . rrrlrrr, rl l l / otlrcls. and did Xi400,000 in property damage
'1,' rlL, r,\r \'.Alt r,rl, \'lll l,rrrrl VIII .'. rsrrrie(l lo (lcscribc thc ASME Boilcr and I'rcsstrrc
Vi....tl(,trit ,, l',," \'ftl ffl\, r'r l. /,,,'r.vt( V, rfry'.r, and l)ivisitttl2, Alk'r'ttttiK |tttll li'r l.l Firerub€ boiler explosion in sho€ focrory in Brockron, Md!3ochuseits in 1905. (Courlesy Horrford
Fisure
/!,11r,, l, \ \, /, St@m Boiler Inrpection ond Insurdn.e Co., Horrford, Cr.)
6 HISIORY AND ORGANT/N rION Of CODTS ].4 ORGANIZATION OF THT ANSI 83 ] CODI] IOR PRISST'RE PIPINO 7
Irr l(X)(r, l'r.llre'cx;rkrsi.rr irr . rlrr)c llrel.ry i'l,yrrrr. Massirclrrtsc.s, r.cs.ltcd T cqUipl c|l{ irrrtl ir;lrlielrliorr; olllcrs fctalc lo sl)ccilic Illillcliltls all(l tlrclll{xls l()f
irr dcalh, injrlry, a|ld cxtcnsivc propcrty darragc. Aticr this accidcnr, the Massa_ ()l
applicatiOn rn(l cot)trol ol cclt'tiprnctrt; lnd tlthcrs rclate ttt care !lnd inspoctioll
clrusctt$ governor directed the fbrmation of a Board of Boiler
Rules. The first set installed cquipnrctrt. 'l'hc tirllowing sections specifically relate to boiler and
of rules for the design and construction of boilers was approved pressure vessel design and constructlon:
in Massachusetts
on August 30, l9O7 . This code was three pages long-!-
In 1911, Colonel E. D. Meier, the president of-the American Society of
Mechanical Engineers, established a committee to write a set of Section I. Power Boilers (one volume)
rules tbr the
design and construction of boilers and pressure vessels. On February
13, 1915,
Section III
the first ASME Boiler Code was issuid. It was entitled ,,Boiler
Construction
Division 1. Nuclear Power Plant Components (7 volumes)
Code, 1914 Edition." This was the beginning of the various
sechons of the
Division 2. Concrete Reactor Vessels dnd Containment (one volume)
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, which ultimately became Code Case Class I Components in Elevated Temperature Service (tn
Section 1,
Power Boilers.3 N-47 Nuclear Code Case book)
The first ASME Code for pressure vessels was issued as ,,Rules fbr Section IV, Heating Boilers (one volume)
^
construction
the
ofUnfired Pressure Vessels,', Section VIII, 1925 edition. The rules Section VIII
applied to vessels over 6 in. in diameter, voiume ove. 1.5 ft3,
and pressure over Division 1. Pressure Vessels (one volume)
30 psi. In December 1931, a Joint API_ASME Committee wis ibrmed Division 2. Alternative Rules for Pressure Vessels (one volume)
to
develop an unfired pressure vessel code for the petroleum indusiry. .l.he
edition was issued in 1934. For the next 17 years,iwo separate unfiied
first Section X. Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic Pressure Vessels (one vol-
pre;sure ume)
vessel codes existed. In 1951, the last API_ASME Code
;as issued as a separare
document.a In 1952, the two codes were consolidated into one
code_the ASME
Unfired Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII. This continued
until the 196g A new edition of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code is issued on July
edition. At that time, the original code became Section VIII, Oivislon
I pres_
sure Vessels, and another new part was issued, which was
, I every three years and new addenda are issued every six months on January I
Seciion VI II, Division
2, Alternatiye Rules for pressure Vessels. and July l. A new edition incorporates all the changes made by the addenda to
The ANSUASME Boiler and pressure Vessel Code is issued the previous edition; it does not incorporate, however, anything new beyond that
by the American
Society of Mechanical Engineers with approval by the American'National coniained in the previous addenda except for some editorial corections or a
Stan_ change in the numbering system. The new edition of the code becomes manda-
dards lnshtute (ANSI) as an ANSI/ASME document.
One or morc sections of
the ANSI/ASME Boiler and pressure Vessel Code have been tory when it appears. The addenda are permissive at the date of issuance and
established as the
legal requirements in 47 of the 50 states in the United Str,", become mandatory six months after that date.
,,",f in all the Code CasesT are also issued periodically after each code meeting They
prwinces of Canada. Also, in many other countries of the
worlti, the ASME
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code is used to construct boilcrs arrc contain permissive rules for materials and special constructions that have not
pressure
vessels. been sufficiently developed to place them in the code itself. Finally, there are the
In the United States most piping systems are built to the ANSI/ASME Code Interpretations8 which are issued every six months These are in the form
Code of questions and replies that further explain items in the code that have been
for P.ressure Piping B3l . There are a number of different
piping couc sectrons
for different types of systems. The piping section that i" ,ir".i tiu. misunderstood.
boiiers in
combination with Section I of the ASME Boiler and pressure
Vcsscl (ixle is the
fo1!-o1er Piping, 831.1.5 The piping secrion thar is olicn uscrt with
!o09 -Cheniical
Section VIII, Division I , is the code for piant and lretnricLrrrr t{clinery
Piping, 831.3.6 I.4 ORGANIZATION OF THE ANSI 83I CODE TOR
PRESSURE PIPING
ANSUAPI Standard 620. "Recommended Rules for Design and Construction France.
of Large, Welded, Low-Pressure Storage Tanks," American Petroleum Insti-
tute (API), Washington, D.C. Constructton Code Calculation Rules for Unfred pressure Vessels, Syndicat
ANSVAPI Standard 650. "Welded Steel Tanks for Oil Storage," American National de la Chaudronnerie et de la Tuyauterie Industrie e (SNCT), paris,
Petroleum Institute, Washington, D.C. France.
ANSI-AWWA Standard D100. "Water Steel Tanks for Water Storage"'
American Water Works Association (AWWA), Denver, Colorado' Germany.
ANSVAWWA Standard D101. "Inspecting and Repairing Steel Water Tanks, A.D. Merkblatt Code, Carl Heymanns Verlag KG, Koln/Berlin, Federal
Standpipes, Reservoirs, and Elevated Tanks, for Water Storage," American Republic of Germany.
Water Works Association, Denver, Colorado.
ANSI 896.1. "specification for Welded Aluminum-Alloy Field Erected Stor- haly.
agc Tanks," American National Standards Institute, New York'
Itqlian Pressure Vessel Code, National Association for Combustion Control
lll, (A4. Standartl for Conk ner Assemblies.lor I'P-Gas, 4th ed, Under- (ANCC), Milan, Iraly.
wlitcrs Laboratories. Nolthbrook, Illinois.
t0
HISTORY AND ORGANTZATION OF
CODES BIBTIOGRAPHY
,ltpun.
ll
,lqnnt'st' l)tt,.t,rurt Vt,l;scl Code. Ministry of 8. ASME Boiler and pressureVessel Code, _fu terpretations, (isstred every
Labor, published by Japan Society of Mechanial Engineers, New york.
six months), Amedcan
lJoilcr Associution. Tokyo, Japan.
Juyuu'ts-t' Standarrl, Construction of pressure
by the Jupan Srandards Association. Tokyo, "- B- g24j,
Vessels,JIS e' 'J' published
Y'
Japan. BIBTIOGMPHY
Jap,ayle High pressure Gas Control Law,
Ministry of International Trade
1i1,1,".t":,ry.Jibtished by rhe rnstitution for
tngtneering, Tokyo, Japan.
sffi riigi;;Jrr*" c", ' Steel Tanks forLiquid Stoege', in Steel plate Engifieerin| Data, Vol.
l, 1976 ed., American Iron
"r and Sreel lnslirute, Washingron, D.C.
Netherlands.
vessets. Dienst voor het stoomwezen,
f,:|;:#i:"*-e The Hague, the
Sweden.
Swedish Pressure Vessel Code,-Tryckkarls
kommissioner, the Swedish pres-
sure Vessel Commission, Stockholm,
Sweden.
United Kingdom.
British Code 85.5500, British Standards
Institution, London, England.
More complete details. discussions of
factors of safety. and applications of
the codes mentioned are given in
Section 2.7. e summ,lry of iti. p_ug.upt,
which.ar.e appticable for ihe various,.reqrl;il
around the world is given in Appendix
;'r#J # ,ti .o0., ur.o
A.
REFERENCES
l3
l4 SttECTlON OF VESSIL, SPECIFICAIl()N". rtlr",lrr'., nND ALLOWABLE STRESSES 2.4 SPECIAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS l5
Although nrlrrly lttr l t. ,,'rrlrl,rt, 1,, llr( \( lL'clion of pressure vessels, the two Currently, the only pressure vessel code, exclusive of the ASME Code, III-l-
basic r.r;rrirr.rrfrrt,, tlr,rt ,rll,, t tlr, ,( [.r lion are safety and economics. Many NB, Nuclear Vessels, which specifically requires formal design specifications as
it(.Drs i||r. r rr,,rrI r,,l rr,tr,r', rrrrrtcrials' availability, corrosion resistance, part of the code requirements is the ASME Code, VIII-2, Alternative Rules for
lrltllrrl,, rrr, rrl,tlr r11, . .rr,l rrrrrgnitudes of loadings, location of installation Pressure Vessels. This code requires a User's Design Specification to be pre-
rr, lr,lprl, ( rnl I,r.r,l'rt' ,"r,t r.rrr'(lrquake loading, location of fabrication_(shoD pared and certified by a registered professional engineer experienced in pressure
"r 1., l,lr t", rrr,,r ,,t \i.,,s(.1 installation, and availability of labor supply at the vessel design. This certification by the professional engineer is given on the
ASME Manufacturer's Data Report, Form A- 1. The manufacturer is responsible
\l rrt, rrr, r, ,r'.rrr1' rrsc of special pressure vessel in the petrochemical and other
for retaining the User's Design Specification for five years.
rrr,lrr rl, , rtr. ;rvrilability of the proper materials is fast becomrng a maJor For other codes and standards, design specifications and design requirements
1,r,,t,1,,,' I lr(. nrost usual material for vessels is carbon steel. Many other special_ are not well defined. For the ASME Code, VIII-1, there is no specific statement
r,,, l r r,rr{ rlls iLre also being used for corrosion resistance or the abilily ro conmln
that any design specifications are required. The only indication of some sort of
.r tlrrrr Iwrthout degradation of the material's properties. Substitution of materials design specifications is the list of minimum loadings in UG-22 that is considered
r'. I x (.vl
lent and cladding and coatings are used extensively. The design engineer
for all construction . Sectron l, Power Eoilers, is less definitive on what loadings
rrrrrst lrc in communication with the process engineer in order that all materials
are necessary to consider and what shall be included in a design specification or
rrsctl will contribute to the overall integrity of the vessel. For those vessels that
purchase order. PG-22 of Section I states that loadings that cause stresses to go
rctluire field assentbly in contrast to those that can be built in the shop, proper higher than 107o above those stresses caused by internal design pressure shall be
(luality assurancc must be established for acceptable welding regardless;f ihe
considered. The Manufacturer's Data Report, Form U-1 for the ASME Code,
adverse condilions under which the vessel is made_ provisions must be estab_
V I-1, requires many items to be listed, which means that most of the basic
lished for ftrrliography, stress relieving, and other operations required in the design information must be given in a design specification or purchase order.
field. Although some codes help the purchaser regarding what data are needed for
For thost. vcssels that will operate in climates where low temperatures are inclusion in the design specifications, this is usually done by mutual agreement
encounlcr((l r)f contain fluids operating irt low temperatures, special care must between the purchaser and the manufacturer.
be takc rr Ir crrsure impact resistance of the materials at low timperatures. To "For those process vessels that do not have a "suggested" list of items in design
ohlirirr tlrs l,r()l)crty, the vessel may require a special high-alloy steel, nonferrous
requirements and specifications as part of code requirements, it is necessary to
rrrirlcrirrl, rrr some special heat treatment.
establish them in the purchase order or contract agreement. The contract infor-
mation is supplied by the purchaser or user with the manufacturer's help as to
what is needed and what shall be considered. Some design standards help the
2.? WHICH PRESSURE VESSEL CODE IS USED?
user and manufacturer by offering fill-in forms that specifically list the require-
'l lrc lrrst consideration ments for designing a process vessel. Design specification forms for a heat
must be whether or not there is a pressute vessel law at exchanger built to the standards of the Tubular Manufacturers Associationz are
llrc lo( irt ion of the installation. If there is, the applicable iodes are stated in the
given in Appendix B and lor an API Srandard 650 Storage Tanki are given in
l:rw. ll thc jurisdiction has adopted the ASME Code, Section VIII, the decision
Appendix C. It is always necessary to maintain a document containing design
rrrly bc narowed down to selecting whether Division I or Division 2 is used.
speciflcations so that a permanent record is kept for reference. Often on a large
I'here are many opinions regarding the use of Division I versus Division 2,
.but the "bottom line" is economics. In the article ,.ASME pressure_Vessel Code:
process vessel, some loadings from attached or supported equipment are not
known until after the job has started.
Which Division to Choose?",r the authors have listed a number of factors for
I
consideration. Division uses approximate formulas, charts, and graphs in
simple calculations. Division 2, on the other hand, uses a complex methocl of
fbrmulas, charts, and design-by-analysis which must be describcd in ir stress
2.4 SPECIAL DESIGN REOUIREMENTS
4. r{ ol thc yicld strength at temperature (except as noted below where 90Zo following: (1) | of the specified minimum yield strength and (2) j of the yield
is uscd). strength at temperature.
For Section IV, Heating Boilers, the criterion for setting the allowable
At temperatures ip the creep and rupture strength range, the least of: stresses is much more simple: (1) I /5 of the specified minimum tensile strength.
l, l00qa of the average stress to produce a creep rate of 0.0l per l000 hours
(l7o in 105 hour).
2. 67Ea of the average stress to produce rupture at the end of 100,000 hours.
2.IO ALTOWABLE EXTERNAL PRESSURE STRESS AND AXIAL
COMPRESSIVE STRESS IN THE ASME BOILER AND PRESSURE
3. 80Vo of the rninimum stress to produce rupture at the end of 100,000
VESSEL CODE
hours.
In the temperature range in which tensile strength or yield shength sets the Within the ASME Boiler Code, simplified methods are given to determine the
,_
allowable stresses, higher allowable stresses are permitted for austenitic stainless maximum allowable external pressure and the maximum allowable axial com-
steels and nickel-alloy materi-als where gleater deformation is not objectionable. pressive stress on a cylindrical shell without having to resort to complex ana-
criterion of I yield strength at lemperature lytical solutions. Various geometric values are contained in the geometry chart,
!9h:l*,the
9oVo,yield strength
may be increased to
whereas materials' properties are used to develop the materials charts.
at temperature. However, the factor
spicified minimum
!
yield strength is still maintained. Allowable stresses in the materials charts are based on the followine criteria
For the ASME Code, VIII-I, bolting material whose slrength has been en_ For cylindrical shells under external pressure, the least of:
hanced by heat treatment or strain hardening have the addition; criteria of (l) j
of the specified minimum tensile strength and (2) t of the specified minimum l. 33Vo of the critical buckling stress with a factor of 807o for tolerance.
yield strength. 2, 33Va of the specified minimum yield strength and yield strength at tem-
For the ASME Code, VIII-2, and Section III, Division 1, Subsection NB and perature.
NC-3200 of Subsection NC, the factor used to set the design stress intensity 3. 67Vo of the average stress to produce a creep rate of 0.01%/1000 hours
values for all materials except bolting is the least of: (17ol 100,000 hours).
4. IOOVo of the allowable stress in tension.
1. i of the specified minimum tensile strength. For spheres and spherical portions of heads under extemal pressure, the least
2. ] of the tensile strength at remperarure. -
OI:
3. of the specified minimum yield strength.
.2
4. J of the yielded strength at temperature except as noted in the tbllowing l. 25Eo of the critical buckling stress with a factor of 607o for tolerance.
paragraph. 2. 25Va of the specified minimum yield strength and yield strength at tem-
perature.
Higher design stress intensity values are permitted for austenitic stainless 3. 507o of the average stress to produce a creep rate of 0.017o/1000 hours
steels and nickel-alloy materi€ls where greater deformation is not objectionable. (17ol100,000 hours).
In this_ case, the criterion of J yield strength at temperature may be increased to
as high as 90Vo yield strength at temperature or any value beiween and gOVo
4. IOOVo of the allowable stress in tension.
!
yield strength at temperatue depending upon the acceptable amount of defor-
mation. However, the factor of j specified minimum yield strength is still
For cylindrical shells under axial compression, the least ol
maintained.
There are two criteria for setting bolting design stress intensity values in the
l. 259o of the critical buckling stress with a factor of 5OVo for tolerance.
ASME Code, VIII-2. For design by Appendix 3, the criteria are the same as for 2. 50Vo of the specified minimum yield strength and yield strength at tem-
the ASME Code, VI -1, because these values are used for the tlcsign of bolts perature.
for flangjs. Ior
design by Appendix 4 of the ASMII (ixlc. VIII_2, and by 3. 1007o of the average stress to produce a creep rate of 0.017o/1000 hrs
Sectirrn Division -l , Slbsdition NB ancl NC-32(X) ot' Sutiscc.riirn IrtC. the
III, ( l7ol 100,000 hours).
crilcria lirr setting bolting design stress intcnsity vitlucs urc thc lesscr of the 4. ljQVo of the allowable stress in tension.
o
t)
rrtt|tl ;6 ;5 ;6
-iA-i-l
Ed
tItl
; 0rt5
ta
a- cr
.9 \o \o t-. F- a- tr
oo ltltitll \o \o \o \o
-i -i .l ^' tt||l
o
@
g
-g eq rl||tl
q,
.i "i -; .-' ttltl
F
g
= .o..).o.i66+
(-)
o
.:9 ii>;h\> I
z
o
o
o :
.-o *s
.E6 -{
3Eq .\..\-\.\ Z. *9.
!ao a d':
ov.
(/)F |
,. i
-> .:Y
5d
:
.9-
ir
E E=
a
3.!
az * aEe
.g .;T .9ir^l$-
. o6; tE ;c===-
.\.\.\.\ ?!: Eg €Et5;;'
oo
.=9 |
;€i
>'<
6 ri\:'
O.
:EH3;E6EE
:E!l-.r'!55::-
E-= O o o o 6.
P-+tstE333E,
=g+ ;.:!do0EEEE
.Eo,;
:, .o
'H; i.g i-oi.lR4
4t4il Eoo+ !,
i;
=<
t-.
z
..'\fra\ot\ooo1
ao
: I.g PF H i.=.=.r
eEeEg,:EiEEfEEEE
E(aG6.6*d-EG?q<<<.
a
E; d---o
oo
120 -9 d* g?
"
c3 la€
go :is
I ."4 .0
5oN
F -;
bo '-i-
=P
E
F3trF ctrEEEE2CCCq
inEG*rj
.0.q.i E I CCE E E CJ
n=
do
E €.i
gv
E u) e g qO
d ;d '
20 F> v) ,5 ,5 =r5===S=55-E=g=3
21
22 STI.TCIION Ot VTSSTI-, SPTCIFICATIONS, REPORTS, AND ALLOWABIE STRESSES 2.12 ATLOWABTE STREss IN OTHER CODES OF THE WORI.D 23
Belgium
2.12 ALLOWABLE STRESS IN OTHER CODES OF THE WORLD
The Belgian rules issued by The Belgian Standards Institute (IBN) permir a
Throughout the world, various factors of safety are applied to materials' data to mixture of code rules from various other countries. The allowable stresses
establish allowable shesses for the design of boilers, pressure vessels, and depend usually upon the codes used. However, the basic allowable smesses are
piping. For the temperature range to that temperature where creep or rupture sets
set as follows:
the allowable stresses, the universal factor for setting allowable stresses is based
on yield strength. In some countries, a factor is applied to sets of data that have
been established from many tests; in others, the data are determined by the low ys
UTS
yield point or the high yield point. In still other countries, the actual data for the
component being designed have its yield strength determined by tests . The actual ' Boilers 3.2 1.6 1.5 n
data of the part are then factored into the design formulas. Not all countries Liquid gas 2.7 1.6 n n
choose to use the ultimate tensile strength as a criterion for setting allowable
stresses. When they do, the factor of safety between various countries rs some-
Air receivers n 1.8 n n
times very different. In order to show these differences, a discussion follows Pressure vessels Various factors at designer's choice
regarding the allowable stress basis of several different countries.
The ierms, symbols, and definitions used are as follows:
Czechoslavakia
UTS : ultimate tensile strength (either specified minimum or data at design
temperature)
y5 = yield strength (either specified minimum or data at design tem- Czechoslovakian rules are extensively detailed for all types of vessels with
different allowable stresses used for intemal pressure as compared with extemal
perature)
pressure. For the design of boilers and pressure vessels, the allowable stresses
R= stress to cause rupture in 100,000 hours are established by the least of:
C: stress to cause total creep or creep rate in 100,000 hours
na : not applicable
n: none or not used *l.5 at temDerature.
24 SELECTION OF VESSEt, SPECITICATIONS. REPORTS, AND ATIOWABTE STRESSES
2.I2 ALTOWABLE STRESS IN OTHER CODES OF THE WORID
UTS
UTS ys R L
Intemal pressure----cylinders
Cast Steel
wall
Heated n 1.6 1.6 1.0
3
wall
Unheated n 1.6 l.) 1.0
DIN n 2.0 l 5 n
Castings n 2.0 2.0 1.25
DIN2or1 n 2.5 1.5 n
Extemal pressure-cylinders without stiffening rings
Tested n l.) 1.5 n
Aluminum and seamless copper
All walls n 2.0 2.0 1.35
DIN 3 J.f
Castings n 2.5 2.5 1.7
DIN2orI
n
n 4.0
1.5
1.5
n
n
Tested n 2.5 1.5 n
F rance
Italy
The French rules for pressure vessel design establish the allowable shesses
depending upon the inspection and the compliance with the SNCT (Syndicat The Italian rules for boilers and pressure vessels establish the allowable stresses
National de la Chaudronnerie et de la Tuyauterie Industrielle) rules. The allow- by the least of the following:
able stresses are established by the least of:
UTS
v,5
Boilers 2.7 1.6 1.6 1.0
SNCT w/insp. 1.6 1.6 1.0 vessels
Pressure n 1.5* 1.5 1.0
SNCT w/insp. 1.6
and analysis 2.7 1.6 1.6 1.0
Not SNCT
w/insp. 2.4 1.5 1.6 1.0
Not SNCT Japan
w/o insp. 1.9 1.6 1.0
The Japanese government does not have one group to develop their design
codes. Rather have several different rules for designing boilerJ and pressure
Gennany vessels. Although they are published by different groups and generally written
by the different groups, all codes are under the control of the Japanese govern-
The three types of pressure vessels recognized by the regulatory agencies in ment. The basis for setting allowable stresses is the least of:
Germany are fixed pressure vessels, mobile pressure vessels, and boilers. The
allowable stresses are established according to a specific DIN (German Industrial
Standard) certificate or by testing. The allowable stresses are set by various
UTS rs
factors of safety on the yield strength with a constant factor of safety on rupture Boilers 1.6 1.67 av. 1.0
as follows: l 25 min.
ys
Pressure vessels 2/(1.6 - jI 1.5 av. 1.0
UTS I .25 min.
Altemative
Steel (not cast)
DIN 3 n I .:) 1.5 n
pressure vessels 3 1.5
DIN2orl n 1.8 1.5 n *1.5 used when YS/IS > 0.85.
Tested n Ll 1.5 n
'whcrcT: YS/TS < O.7.
26 SETECTION OF VTSSEI, SPTCIFICATIONS, REPORTS, AND ATTOWABI.E STRESSES REFERENCES 27
Sweden ANSUAPI Standard 650, Welded Steel Tanks for Oil Storage, 7th ed., American Petroleum
Institute, Washington, D.C., 1980.
1982 AnnuaL Book of ASTM Standards, Afieican Society for Testing and Materials, Philadel-
The Swedish rules for the design of boilers and pressure vessels set the allowable phia, Pa., 1982.
stresses using only the yield strength and the rupture strength as follows: DIN Standa (Deutsche Normen Dll,lr, Herausgegeben vom Deutschen Normeruusschu
(D,VA), Berlin, Gemany.
UTS ys C
Unilctl Kingdom
The British rules for the design of boilers and pressure vessels are collectively
called British Standards. The basis for settine the allowable stresses is the least
of:
UTS ys R
Boilers-
BS 1113 2.7 1.5 I _.'
Pressure vessels
BS 5500
Carbon steel 2.35 1.5 I _J
Stainless steel 2.5* 1.5 l.J
RTTTR.ENCES
l. Srrrrlcn, A. M., and J. R. Mase, "ASME Pressure-Vessel Code: Which Division to Choose?",
('hrt\k\tl lit|ineering, January ll,
1982.
lnrthorlt oJ luhular Exchanger Manufacturers.Asroc., 6th ed., Tubular Exchanger Manu-
lrrllrrrr As$oci0lbn, White Plains, N.Y., 1978.
rl,JJ [l lcnr|t(rrlrtrr.
- -
'Fxy
2f l+u)
CHAPTER 3
STRENGTH THEORIES,
DESIGN CRITERIA, AND
DESIGN EQUATIONS
i,=#n(* .,&*)
r1 = -q.C-/afu*razn1
" i 2 (l -p'J \ayz ,,'I
L. t" a_w
^J i 211*u; a*aY
29
30 sTRINGTH THEORIES, DESIGN CRITERIA, AND DISIGN TQUATIONS 3.2 DESIGN CRITERIA 3I
ln the design of process vessels and pressure equipment, two basic modes of The design criteria for both Sections I and IV basically call for determining the
failure may be assumed: elastic failure based on the theory of elasticity and minimum wall thickness that will keep the basic circumferential stress below an
plastic failure based on the theory of plasticity. Except for thick-walled vessels, allowable stress level. Additional rules and charts are included for determining
elastic failure is usually assumed for the design of pressure vessels. It is consid- the minimum thickness of various components. However, in general, a detailed
ered to occur when the elastic limit of the material is reached. Beyond this limit, stress analysis is required only for special designs. Sections I and IV recognize
excessive deformation or rupture is expected. These limits are usually measured that local and secondary stresses may exist in some areas of pressure vessels;
in terms of tensile strength, yield strength, and, to some degree, rupture design details, however, have been established to keep these stresses at a safe
strength. level with a minimum of stress analysis investigation.
Of the many theories developed to predict elastic failure, the three most The design criteria of the ASME Code, VI -1, and Section III, Division l,
commonly used are the maximum principal stress theory, the maximum shear Subsections NC except NC-3200, ND, and NE, are similar to those for Sections
stress theory, and the distortion energy theory. The maximum (principal) stress I and IV except that the ASME Code, VI[-I, and Section III, Division l,
theory considers failure to occur when any one of the three principal stresses has Subsections NC, ND, and NE require cylindrical shell thickness calculations
reached a stress equal to the elastic limit as determined from a uniaxial tension based on both the circumferential and the longitudinal directions. The minimum
or compression test. The maximum shear stress theory (also called the Tresca required thickness may be set by stresses in either direction. In addition, the
criterion) considers failure to occur when the maximum shear stress equals the ASME Code, VIII-1, permits the combination of primary membrane stress and
shear stress at the elastic limit as determined from a pure shear test. The primary bending stress to go as high as 1.5 S at temperatures where tensile and
maximum shear stress is defined as one-halfthe algebraic difference between the yield strength control and 1.25 S at temperatures where creep and rupture
largest and smallest of the three principal stresses. The distortion energy theory control, where S is the allowable tensile stress values.
(also called the maximum strain energy theory, the octahedral shear theory, and The design criteria for the ASME Code, VIII-2, provide formulas and rules
the von Mises criterion) considers failure to have occurred when the distortion for thd?nore common configurations of shells and formed heads for temperatures
energy accumulated in the pad under stress reaches the elastic limit as deter- when the allowable stress criteria do not exceed the yield strength and tensile
mined by the distortion energy in a uniaxial tension or compression test. strength range. Requirements include detailed evaluations of actual stresses in
Engineers have known for some time that the maximum shear stress theory complex geometries and with unusual loadings, especially if a cyclic loading
and the distortion energy theory predict yielding and fatigue failure in ductile condition exists. These calculated stresses are assigned various categories and
materials better than does the maximum stress theory.r However. the maximum subcategories that have different allowable stress values as multipliers of the
stress theory is easier to apply, and with an adequate safety factor it gives basic allowable stress intensity value. The various categories and subcategories
satisfactory designs. But where a more exact analysis is desired, the maximum are:
shear stress theory is used.
Two basic theories of strength are used in the ASME Boiler and hessure
Primary stresses, including general primary membrane stress, local primary
Vessel Code. Section I,2 Section IV,3 the ASME Code, VI[-1, and Section III,
membrane stress, and primary bending stress
Division 1, Subsections NC,4 ND,5 and NE6 use the maximum stress theory.
Section III, Division l, Subsection NB7 and the optional part of NC, and the Secondary stresses
ASME Code, VtrI-2, use the maximum shear stress theory. Peak stresses
In the two sections of the ASME/ANSI Code for Pressure Piping 83l that are
used primarily with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, both ANSI Primary stress is caused by loadings that are necessary to satisfy the laws of
83 l. l6 and 83 1. 3e use the maximum stress theory. 83 1.3 is unique in that it uses equilibrium between applied forces and moments. Primary stesses are not
the maximum stress theory but permits allowable stresses to be established on self-limiting .
the same basis as the ASME Code, VIII-2, which requires use of the maximum Secondary stress is developed by self-constraint of the structure. Its basic
shear stress theory. The other sections of 831 also use the maximum stress chamcteristic is that it is selfJimiting. That is, rotation and deformation or
theory. They require that in addition to the stresses caused by intemal and deflection take place until the forces and moments are balanced even though
cxternal pressures, tiose stresses caused by thermal expansion of the piping are some pennanent geometric changes may have taken place.
to he considered. Lastly, peak stress is the highest stress condition in a structure and is usually
32 STRTNGTH THEORIIS, DESIGN CRITERIA, AND DESIGN EQUATIONS 3.4 STRESS-STMIN REIATIONSHIPS
due to a stress concentration caused by an abrupt change in geometry. This stress 3.3 DESIGN EQUATIONS
is important in considering a fatigue failure because of cyclic load application.
In general, thermal stresses are considered only in the secondary and peak Once the allowable stresses are set, the basic design equations must be devef
categories. Thermal stresses that cause a distortion of the structure are catego- oped. The design of process equipment is based on the assumption that the
rized as secondary stresses; thermal stresses caused by suppression of thermal material generally behaves elastically at the design pressure and design tem-
expansion, but may not cause distortion, are categorized as peak stresses. perature. Accordingly, most of the equations are derived from the theory of
Potential failure modes and the various stress limits categories are related. elasticity and shength of materials basis.
Limits on primary stresses are set to prevent deformation and ductile burst. The
primary plus secondary limits are set to prevent plastic deformation leading to
incremental collapse and to validate using an elastic analysis to make a fatigue 3.4 STRESS-STRAIN RETATIONSHIPS
analysis. Finally, peak stress limits are set to prevent fatigue failure due to cyclic
loadings. The stress-strain relationship at any point within a homogeneous, isotropic, and
The basic stress iniensity limits for various categories relating to an analysis linearly elastic body that is subjected to a system of forces is obtained from the
according to the ASME Code, VIII-2, and Section III, Division 1, Subsection theory of elasticity. Referring to Fig. 3.1, the stress-strain relationship is given
NB, and optional Part NC-3200 of Subsection NC are: by
Factor Factor 1.
Based on Based on
e,: ELo,-
p(oy + ozl)
Allowable Yield Tensile
Stress Intensity Category Value Strength* Strength* t. ploz 'r
er = ELor-
o^)J
General primary membrane
(P,) ks, 3s, -!c e,-
I
: ;lo,- tt(o,- I o)l (3.1)
Local primary membrane I1-
(P")
himary membrane plus
UKS^ s) +s" rs
,DGE
2(1 + 1t)
.t/,- =
2(1 + 1t)
i--
In the ASME Code, VIII-2, and Section III, Division 1, optional Part NC- L
3200 of Subsection NC, a factor of ft is applied to various loading combinations
somewhat related to whether or not the loading is sustained or transient. The
Or, in a different form.
laotors are k = 1.0 for sustained loads including dead loads and pressure; -
k - 1.2 for sustained load plus wind or earthquake loads; t = 1.25 for hydro-
$tiltic tcsts; and k - 1.15 for pneumatic tests. [e,(l - pc) + p,(e, + e,)]
'I'hc dcsign criteria for Section III, Division l, Subsection NB, are very (r+ tt)(1 -zp.)
sinrillr lo thoso for the ASME Code, VIII-2, except there is less use of design
p) + +
-2tt) [e,(1 -
lirrrrrrrlrrs, culvcs, tnd tables, and greater use of design by analysis in Section IIL p.(e" e")l
(1,+p.)(1
'l'h(. cfllcgorics ol slrcsses and stress intensity limits are the same in both sec-
liorrs.
(l + p)(1 - LIL)
[€,(1 - pr,)+p(e.+er)] (3.2)
+AiiurriflI lhrt I ,\,,, (lcsiSn strcss intensity valuc fbr Section III, Division l, Subsection
-
| .O. Ii^,
Nll, n[(l thc | i',nrl pIr I {rl S hsr(.li()n NC, and thc ASMts Codc, VIII-2 (psi), S" = yicld strength T, : " ltl
(plri). url ,\,'t{ ultirrxrtc k nsil(. slfrJrgth (psi) 2(l + 1.t)
34 STRENGTH THIORIES, DTSIGN CRITERIA, AND DESIGN EQUATIONS 3.5 STRAIN-DEFTECTION EQUATIONS 35
t2 equations reduce to
I
' f1--->
@ I
t4
t"l
<-f3
e,:
t.
q= i\ar-
1.
E\ox - psr)
Po')
(3.3)
€,: Elo' + stl
2(1 + tt)
f"y = --E- r"t
o, = ---!
L-p- ,1u" * *rs
I o,:;\1e,
t-
+ p'es
I lL- (3.4)
, c,:0
(b) v
E
3.1 Slrcls rerulianr ot o point wirhin o
Figure homogeneous, isotropi<, ond lin€orly eldsri. body.
',=76+ iil*
F.,
r, = zG; 3.5 STRAIN-DEFLECTION EQUATIONS
tL)
Ev- Figure 3.2 is cross section of a pressure vessel wall. It undergoes an extension
Tn : ;:;---,----.._
L\r t trL) in the niddle surface of €o due to stretching plus extension due to bending. The
original length lr at a distance z from the middle surface is given by
where eb ey e,: axial strain in the.r, y, and z-directions, respectively
oo o, =oz axial stress in the .r, y, and z-directions, respeptively t,=adr-1\
"y,!, yr,, y- = shearing strain in the -r, y, and z-directions, respectively
: The final length l2 after extension is
re, T
rz, rp shearing stress in the.r, y, and z -directions, respectively
E = modulus of elasticity of material (psi)
tz: dstt + .*r(r - 4)
G = shear modulus of material (psi) \ r./
1,c
: poisson's ratio whereas strain is given by
In most pressure vessel applications, the values of o,, rr,, and r,, are relatively lr- lt
small compared with o, and or. Hence, they are normally ignored and the ,":
l,
36 STRENGTH THEORIES, DESIGN CRITERIA, AND DESIGN TQUATIONS
3.5 STRAIN.DEFTECTION EQUATIONS 37
However, because the quantity dw fdx is smal! compared with unity, the expres-
sion above becomes
d2w . d2w
X': 77 a;to Xt = 7F
(3.6)
Fisure 3.2 Cross s€ction of o sh€ll woll subie€ted to str€rchine ond bendins lodds'
"l'Y:"loq+a+P
Substituting the values of lr and lz into the above and deleting all small terms
where is the shearing stress due to in-place forces and d and B are due to
7qry
results in
twisting moments. Also, from the figure,
(t l\ : e0,_
€.: €or _ ,\,:_ z. x\
i) . (d/ d\'ldv du
d-srna -__6-: dy
where 1, is change in curvature. Similarly, (dD/?x)dx 0a
IJ-srnP- d, =A
€n : €ou
/ r l\
-,\4- i) = es - z' xt
and
Substitution of the above two equations into Eq. 3.4 gives
du 0a
(3.8)
F
+ f,t: Ioq, dy- a,
o,: ,-:--Lr" + peo! - z(y" trt'yt)
t-lt-
(3.5) From Fig. 3.30, which represents the middle surface, the rotation is given by
ti
q- ,--l€vt + l"r*- z(Xr+ PX') -@w I Ai. The minus sign indicates counterclockwise rotation. As a result of
t- lL- this rotation, any point at a distance z from the middle surface will have a
deflection of
Nolr llrirl llr(' cx|)tcssirttt f, is related to the deflection by the expression
dzw dx2 dw
/
x'=tt+kt"4'hffn dx
39
38 STRENGTH THEORIES, DESIGN CRITERIA, AND DESIGN EQUATIONS 3.6 FORCE-STRESS EXPRESSIONS
3.6 FORCLSTRESSEXPRESSIONS
The force-stress relationship for the cross section shown in Fig' 3 4a can be
exDressed as
u.= z)a"
z tD, [".'lt -
Figura 3.3 Sh€or dolormdliom of o unit cro$ .ection.
- u,= J",'lr - i)a,
,, = -[ ,,'lt - 1)a"
Similarly, u*= [,,",(t-4;,
dte
D = -Z--dy
In the majority of cases, the quantity z/r is small with respect to unity and can
Hence Eq. 3.8 becomes thus be dlsregarded. Also, substituting Eqs. 3.7 and 3.9 into 8q 3 10 gives
40 STRENGTH THEORITS, DESIGN CRITERIA, AND DESIGN EQUATIONS
3.6 FORCE.STRESSEXPRESSIONS 4l
,.:&(#.#) (3.1 r)
u,=ffi\(*tu. ,*tu)
,. Eilt - tL) drw
l2ll - lt2t ax dy
-230 x 10-6. What are the stresses in the three principal directions at the
opening?
Solutian. Using the equations given under Eq. 3.2, the stresses are determined
AS
,/
,oq :
o,: ;#1Q60X0.7)
( r.Jrw.+.,
+ 0.3(180 - 230)l 13'630 psi
,qq
'
",: -*l(180)(0.7)
t r.JJ(u.+,
+ 0.3(360 - 230t1 = 9499 O.;
?qo
o = (1.3x0.4)" --""' + 0.3(360 + 180)l :
"'' tr-?10rr0.7) 60 psi I
Exanple 3.2. What are the stresses in the two principal directions of the
cylindrical shell with the o, = gt
Solution. Using the simplified equations given under Eq. 3.4, the stresses are
determined as
Et
N. = r /,€q,
r-lJ' r(€0r+
Ft + 0.3 x
', =ffioso =
180) 13,6oo psi
N, : .--------t (€0) + p€0r.)
l- lL'
N,}
1'u,Et o, =ffi{rto + 0.3 x 360) : 9460 psi r
2(l + 1t)
42 SIRTNOTH THEORI€S, DTSIGN CRITERIA, AND DESIGN EQUATIONS
BIELIOGRAPHY 43
Problems
BIBTIOGRAPHY
3.1 Strain gages are attached to the surface of a tube subiected to internal
Brownell, L. E., and E. H. Yoi{Irlg, Process Equipment Design, John Wiley, New york, 1959.
pressure. The gages lie along the circumferential and l,ongitudinal axes.
FattWI, J, H., Engineering Design, John Wiley, New York, l9&.
The tube is carbon steel with t x :
= 29.9 106psi, 1.r, 0.3, and the stress Ha0ey, J. F., Theory and Design of Modern Pressure Vessels,2nd ed., Van Nostrand-Reinhold,
at the surface in the circumferential direction is 17,500 psi. What are the
Princeton, N.J.
strain gage readings in the two directions?
Seely, F. B. and J. O. Smith, Advanced Mecfuinics of Makriak,2nded., John Wiley, New york,
1952.
Answer: e,: *498 x 10-6
€i: +117 x 10-6
3.2 In the tube of Problem 3.1, what is the strain in the z -direction? Usins that
answer and the other answers in Problem 3.1, what are the calcrilated
stresses in the three directions?
REFERENCES
Criteria of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for Design by At],',ltsis in Sections III
and VIII, Division 2, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New york, 1969.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section I, Power Boilers, ANSVASME BPV-I,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New york, 1983.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Sectionly, Heating BoiIeB, ANSVASME BPV-IV,
American Society of Mechanical Enginers, New York, 1983.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division l, Subsection NC, Class 2
Components, ANSUASME BPV-m-I-NC, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New
York, 1983.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section l,
III, Division Subsection ND, Crllrr.i
Components, ANSL?ASME BPV-III-1-ND, American Society ofMechanical Engineers, New
York. 1983.
ASMII Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division l, Subsection NE, Class MC
(i)tnpt,nt',ttr, ANSTASME BPV- I-l-NE, American Society ofMechanical Engineers,
New
Y,nk, 1983.
7. ASMIj lllrilcr and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 1, Subsecrion NB, CIaJJ 1
( t'ntt\'tl' t.t, ANSI/ASME BPV- I-l-NB, American Society ofMechanical Engineers,
New
Y(n (. l()8l
ASMf i ( \nk. li,r I'rcssurc PipingB3l, Power Prping, ANSLIASME83l.1, Amedcan Society
ol Mrrhfiri(nl li[8inccrs, New York, 1980.
ASMf (irtfc lix Prcssure Piping B3l, Chemical plant and petroleum Rertnery pipin|,
ANSI/AliMll ll I I L Amcr'can Soc'ety of Mechanical Engineers, New york, 19g0.
CHAPTE R 4
MATERIALS OF
CONSTRUCTION
44
46 MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION
The vast majoriry of vessels are constructed of ferrous and nonferrous alloys'
Ferrous alloys are defined as those having more than 50Vo iron They are
used
in the eSME Code, VI[-l and 2, and include carbon and low-alloy steels'
steels'
stainless steels, cast iron, wrought iron, and quenched and tempered
copper, nickel, titanium, and zirconium
Nonfenous alloys include aluminum,
The ASTM designates all ferrous alloys by the letter A and all nonferrous alloys
the ASME
by B. ASME uses the prefixes SA and SB, respectively ln most cases
built to the ASME
unO eSfV specifications are identical. However, vessels
Code usually refer to the ASME specifications'
Nonmetilic pressure vessels may also be constructed to the ASME Code'
plas-
Recently, ASME Section X was published to include fiberglass-reinforced
tic (FRij vessels. Details of construction are given in Section 46' Concrete
rules are
vessels are also being considered by the ASME However, no specific
available at this time.
and
Selecting materials that are adequate for a given process is complicated
depends on many factors such as corrosion, strength, and cost'
4.1.1 Corrosion
Fisure 4.1 Cotroded corbon sleel lubesheet. (Courl$y of the Nooter Corp., St. touis, Mo.)
Corrosion,whichisdefinedasthedeteriorationofmetalsbychemicalaction'
is probably the single most important consideration in selecting materials
A
stigtrt ctrange in the chemical composition of a given -environment can sig-
in
nifi'cantly cilange the corrosive behavior of a given metal This is illustrated
epp""Oi* H, i,trich lists various environments and their effect on different
ferrous and nonferrous alloYs.
In a new chemical process, it is prudent to determine the factors that affect
the most
the corrosion and then run tests on various materials in order to select
"city
suitable one. Figure 4.1 shows an example of a heat exchanger.used in
water" service. The corroded tubesheet is made of carbon steel and the un-
corroded tubes are made of copper' Another example shown in Fig 4'2 is a
4.1.2 Strenglh
The strength level of a material has a significant influence on its selection for a
given application. This is especially true at elevated temperatures where the
yield and ultimate strength are relatively low and the creep and rupture behavior
may control the allowable stress values. In the ASME Code, VIII-l, the criteria
for allowable stress at elevated temperatures take into account both the creep and
rupture behavior as discussed in Section 2.4. In applying the ASME criteria for
allowable stress as given there, the following procedures are used.
In obtaining the minimum yield shess of a given material, test data are plotted
at vadous temperatures as shown in Fig . 4 . 5 . A smooth trend curve is then drawn
though the averages of the data for individual test temperatures. The specified
minimum yield stress curve is obtained by applying to the yield trend curve the
ratio of the specified minimum value, as given in the material specification, to
the trend value of 80"F.
Fisure 4.3 Hosrelloy C chure. (Courtesy o{ the Nooter Corp., Sr. rouk, Mo.)
temperature,"F
Fisure 4.4 Crock in o Corpenter 20 lube weld. (Court6y of Nooier Corp., Sr. toui., Mo )
Figure 4.5 Tensile ond yield 3irengrh.
48
!0 MATERIATS OI CONSTRUCTION 4.I MATTRIAI. SETECTION 5l
Creep Rate Example 4.1. A user is requesting code approval for a new material that has
a minimum specified tensile stress of 120 ksi and a minimum specified yield
In order to establish the creep rate of lVo /lffi,O}} hours, data are plotted as stress of 60 ksi at room temperature. Tensile and yield values for various heats
shown in Fig. 4.6. Interpolation and extrapolation may be needed to establish and temperatures are shown in Fig. 4.5. Creep and rupture data are given in Figs.
the creep rate for various temperature levels. 4.6 and 4.7, respectively. What are the allowable stress values at 300 and 1200'F
based on criteria siven in Section 2.4?
.0001 1,000
Llle llrs.
Figur€ ,{.6 Cre€p strengrh. Figur€ 4.7 Rupture strengrh.
52 MATERIATS OF CONSTRUCTION 4.2 NONFERROUS ATLOYS
Cost in
l. From Fig. 4.5, average tensile stress = 130 ksi. Type Dollars/lb
Tensile stress reduced to minimum : l3O x 120/140: 111 ksi.
Specified minimum tensile stress : 111 x 1.10 : 122 kst. Carbon steel 0.30
Maximum stress to be used cannot exceed 120 ksi. Low-alloy steel 0.7 5
Allowable stress based on tensile stress : 120/4 = 30 ksi. Stainless steel 0.90-2.50
2. From Fig. 4.5, average yield sffess : 60 ksi. Aluminum 1.50
Yield stress reduced to minimum : 60 x 60/75: 48 ksi. Copper, bronze t.'7 5
Allowable stress based on yield stress : 48 x 6 = 32 ksi. Incoloy 4.00
3. From Figs. 4.6 and 4.7 it is apparent that creep and rupture are not a Monel 5.00
consideration at 300'F. Inconel 6.00
4. Therefore, maximum allowable stress at 300"F = 30 ksi Hastelloys 15.00
Titanium 15.00
Zirconium 20.00
Allowable Stess at 1200"F
Tantalum 250.00
1. From Fig. 4.5, average tensile saess : 112 ksi. 'As of January 1983.
Tensile stress reduced to minimum : lI2 x 120/1,4O: 96 ksi.
Specified minimum tensile stress = 96 x 1.1 : 106 ksi, which is less 4.2 NONFERROUS ATLOYS
than maximum allowed of 120 ksi.
Allowable stress based on tensile stress = 106/4 : 26.5 ksr. The 1983 ASME Section VIII Code, VI[-1, lists five nonfenous alloys for code
2. From Fig. 4.5, average yield shess = 54 ksi. construction: aluminum, copper, nickel, titanium, and zirconium. These alloys
Yield stress reduced to minimum = 52 x 6O/7t: 42 ksi. are normally used in corrosive environment or elevated temperatures where
Allowable stress based on yield stress = 42 x 6 = 28 ksi. ferrous alloys are unsuitable. Nonferrous alloys are nonmagnetic except for
3. From Fig. 4.6, creep stress for 0.O1Vo rn 1000 hours = 15 ksi. commercially pure nickel which is slightly magnetic.
Allowable stress based on creep = 15 ksi.
4. From Fig. 4.7. stress to cause rupture at 105 hours = 22 ksi. 4.2.1 Aluminum Alloys
Allowable stress based on rupture = 0.67 x 22: 14.7 ksi.
5. Therefore, maximum allowable stress at 1200"F = 14.7 ksi. I Aluminurn alloys have a unique combination of properties that make them usable
in process equipment applications. They are nonmagnetic, light in weight, have
good formability, and have an excellent weight-strength ratio. Aluminum sur-
faces exposed to the atmosphere form an invisible oxide skin that protects the
4. I .3 Moteriol Cost rnetal from further oxidation. This characteristic gives aluminum a high resis-
lance lo corroslon.
llt'r'rrrrsc costs of materials vary significantly, the designer must evaluate mate- Aluminum alloys have a systematic numbering system as shown in Table 4.2.
riirl (osl vcrsus other facton such as corrosion, expected life of equipment, 'l he specification number also designates the various product forms. For exam-
Ivrrilirl'ility ol material, replacement cost, and code restrictions on fabrication plc, SB 209 applies to plate products, and SB 210 applies to drawn seamless tube
rrrrl rr'1ririrs. n summary of the cost of some frequently used materials is given lxrtlucts. The first digit of the alloy designation number indicates its major
rn l irlrlt ,l. | . With the large difference in cost, the designer should consider the rllloying element as shown in Table 4.2.
lrx l(xs ltfior' 11r sclccting a given material. All aluminum alloys are categorized by ASME specification number, alloy
NONIERROUS ATTOYS Jf
54 MATERIATS OF CONSTRUCTION
EXAMPLE+
C ST'TG
FLITES
(n^|?{ sElra-Ess
NE DEGREE G C@,ITF|OL OF
fr-Ttta TE]FER OR TO IENTIFY
A STECIAL s,ET G MECH-
F4t5, A4AS
a $aPEli
cEr€E €EF a |€,/17
E(U{A'GF ltE
ffiffi6-
nE
DIE I TUTO
Fffi'T€S
,.ffi"ffi#*EffidF- 2- nLUT
At'tt.€ALm
Jfit<,6lLlfY. 3- TO.J HT TI]EN
"'ffi,#P.*,fffr4ffi..ffisffi* "-
#?,'ffif fi? ,HEN NATLTRALLY
AGED TO sTAfuE COI'IDIT ION
5- ARTIFICIALLY AGED o/v-Y
t' ffi.,,ffi*.ffi.ffi";^318H:" ,oPt-tcar td€ 6- SLUT lc',l HT TIIEN
ART]FICIALLY AGED
designation, and temper designation as shown in Tables 4.2 and 4.3. Some of Stain Hardening.
the terms in the tables are defined as follows: Modification of metal structure by cold working resulting in an increase in
strength with a loss in ductility.
Annealing.
Consists of heating the material to a given temperature and then slowly Thermal Treating.
cooling it down. The purpose is to soften the material in order to remove cold Temperature treatment of an alloy to produce a stable temper.
working stress.
4.2.2 Copper ond Copper Alloys
Norm.alizing.
Most copper alloys are used because of their good corrosion resistance and
Consists of heating rnaterial to a temperature slightly higher than the an- machinability. They are also homogeneous as compared with steel or aluminum
nealing temperatue and then cooling at a rate that is faster than annealing.
and thus not susceptible to heat treatment' Their strength, generally speaking,
S o lution H eat Tr eatin g. may be altered only by cold working. The alioy designation system serves to
identify the type of material as shown in Table 4.4. Alloys 101-199 are normally
Heat heating at a temperature high enough for the alloys to be randomly a high grade copper with very few alloys added. Alloys 201-299 normally refer
dispersed.
b brass products that are mainly copper and zinc. Alloys 501-665 are bronze
Stahilizing. products composed of copper and elements other than zinc. Other properties of
copper alkrys are also sbown in the Table.
A low temperature heating to stabilize the property of an alkry
56 MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION
E E
ra ra
Eo
di
\o
-co a':
of
a
d\o-
T 5
co cD rq
\D
\o
\O \O
@
oO
o
T
ca
A A U) \J U) tan U) u) a a I
I
HFr"
EoS E g,.E$
\o
l0l-199 Coppers 5
20tJ99 Copper-zinc alloys (brass)
.3;o
.t2 ax dicc ca rq...j Ecco e
a\)a a u1 v u) rh a
301-399 Copper-zinc-lead alloys (leaded brass)
401-499 Copper-zinc-tin alloy (tin brass)
501-599 Copper-tin alloy (phosphor bronze) E
601-645 Copper-aluminum alloys (aluminum bronze) z \o \o \o \or
64s-665 Copper-silicon (silicon brcnze) II rI IQCQ I
U' .J1 U) |
666-699 Miscellaneous copper alloys
701J30 Copper-nickel alloys
rr + a- C-+
Cold-Worked TemPer Designations \o \o \o \oi
ir) +
+ @
: O-
<f r)
B;=
a. ,B t: ta) tt) A I aa a t4 av)
Approximate 9o Reduction I
bY Cold Working
0.9
Qua(er Hard r
\o sf \o
Half hard 20.7
Three-quarte$ hard 29.4 vt(hu)l lv)aa
Hard 31 .l
Extra hard 50.0
Spring 60.5
68.7 >doF IIi
Extra spring €
<AE a ao !v Q
'r,
v v> 6 nG R
6 88
Most copper alloys are distinguishable by their color except for Cu-Ni alloys
that tend to lose their color as the amount of Ni is increased
s? a
$na$$qqqqq H5 g
al ao
6
-aEP
3-EE
& (./t
t3,38nA3nn3F^ AA n | 3 |
z q s€$3$€$€$$$€ € qq
sAAEn'-n3333a3383 I'i |:SX F-
E)
t83 tr
-ii
ocq
ttt ca u) || |
|
=- *A AAenE3a 3 -tY
l(ha
v-' \o
s$$nHfiH$$+q
q-
EEU*
nAaeBSaaSSa ; g nE H E
El
al R= ><> )<x i{
5
C)
t
gg
a^r'i=-=
EEEEtt
U
O O
O giss!ig$gqB
622t2322222
II.
z
U
t!
26
n*i
.i+t- ,9, ,9
1 o z zzz
!
U
I
g
;i .rrrr{a /\/tx
X XE AH O:'
ln ;Qo;FQ;Fe36g.S
i EuEt sc ig ig I5 ic kc ic Ig Ig d)i dliH C:F
3g5Eg6s€9lsd€
JJ.o i6\
59
MATERIATS OF CONSTRUCTION 4.4 HEAI TREATING OF STEETS 6I
4.3 FERROUS ALTOYS steels. lhese elements enhance the steel for high temperature applications and
in hydrrigen service.
Iron alloys with carbon content of less than 2qo arc known as steels and those High-Alloy Steels.
with more than 27o are known as cast iron. Steels are further divided into those
with carbon content of more than 0.87o, called hypereutectoid steels, and those These are commonly refened to as stainless steels. They have mainly chro-
with carbon content of less than 0.87o, known as hypoeutectoid steels. Most mium (over lOVo), nickel, and molybdendm alloys. The basically three types
steels used in pressure vessel applications have a carbon content of less than of stainless steel used in process equipment are as follows:
0.47o. Steels with carbon content of over O.4Eo are very brittle and hard to weld.
M artensitic Stainless Steels.
Cast iron used in pressure vessels dates back to the nineteenth century.
However, because cast iron is very brittle and because it cannot be rolled, This group includes type 410, which has a low chromium content of slightly
drawn, or welded, its use in pressure vessels presently is limited to complicated above lTEo. They behave like steel, are magnetic, heat heatable, and difficult
components and configurations. The ASME Code, VIII-I, also imposes lim- to fabricate.
itations on the pressure and temperature ranges and the repair methods.
Feffitic Stainless Steels.
Steel alloys can be produced with a wide variety of alloying elements. Some
of the common elements and their effect on steel products are shown in Table This group includes types 405 and 430. They are magnetic but not heat
4.6. The ASME Code, VIII-1, divides steel alloys into the following categories: treatable.
These are widely used in pressure vessels. They have mainly silicon and This group includes all 200 and 300 series and are chromium-nickel and
manganese as the main alloying elements and are limited in temperature chromium-nickel-manganese steels. They arc nonmagnetic and not heat
applications to about 1000'F. heatable.
Low-Allny Steels.
These are essentially cbromium (up to l07o), Molybdenum, and nickel-alloy 4.4 HEAT TREATING OF STEELS
The lattice structure of steel varies from one form to another as the temperature
Tqble 4.6 Effecl of Alloying Elements in Sfeel changes. This is illustrated in Fig. 4.8. Between room temperature and 1333"F,
the steel consists of what is known as "ferrite and pearlite." Ferrite is a solid
Element Advantases Element Advantages
solution of a small amount of carbon dissolved in iron. Pearlite, which is shown
in Fig. 4.9, is a mixture of ferrite and iron carbide. The carbide is very hard and
Aluminum Restricts grain growth Strengtheqs annealed
steels britde.
Chromium Incrcases resistalca to
Toughens steels In Fig. 4.8 between lines A1 Qower critical ternperature) and A3 (upper critical
corrosion and oxidation
Increases hardenability Improves oxidation temperature) the carbide dissolves more readily into the lattice that is now called
Adds strength at high reslstance "ferrite and austenite." Austenite is a solid solution of carbon and iron that is
temperature Increases hardenability denser than ferrite.
MirrUlocsc Counteracts sulfur Strengthens steel Above line 43 the lattice is uniform in property, with the austenite the main
brittleness Titanium Prevents formation of structure. The actual temperature for this austenite range is a function of the
I ncrcases hardenability austenite in high carbon content of the steel as shown in Fig. 4.8.
Molylrk rrrrrrr l{ iscs grain-coarsening chromium steels With this brief description, we can now discuss various heat treatments of
l('l|ll)crilturc Prevents localized carbon steel.
( illrrlcrircls tcndency depletion of chomium
t(,wirr(l lcnrpcr brittleness in stainless steel during Normalizing.
Iinllnrl(cs corrosion long heating This consists of heating the steel to about 100"F above the upper critical line
l( sislirtlec Vanadium Increases hardenability Ai and tben cooling in still air. The purpose is to homogenize the steel
Rcsists tcmpcring
structurc and oroduce a harder steel than the annealed condition
63
62
MATERIATS Of CONSTRUCTION 4.5 BRITTTE FMCTURE
'ri Quenching.
The rate of cooling of steel after heat treating is very
important in e-stablishing
SA-517 obtain most of their high
ifr" ft.an"t. of st"eel Some steels such as
on manY.factors such as
= ,t Uy qt"*fting. The rate of cooling.depends
"ttgtft tlmperature of quenching medium' and size and mass of
qu"nittlng -iAiu.,
the part.
Tempering.
they are heat
Ouenched steels are very brittle. In order to increase toughness'
;;;; il"* ;.;d then cooled to produce the desired propertv of high
strength and good toughness.
NORI'ALIZED
ANNEALED The Cv test is the simplest and most popular method of qualitatively determining
PEARLITE
Figure 4.9
PEARLITE
P€arlile 3tructure. ffi'rrl."--i-Grl^cF*-T
of
ASTM- A-370_-and consistf impact teslrn_g
9-n:sl:dJp.j"r_Tglllg: lljS
taken from a spbcifib location of a product lorm. l he speclmen ls srucK wlln a
falling weighi(Fig.4.l}b) and the energy required to fracture it at various
tempJratures is recorded. Figure 4.11 shows two typical plots of the temperature
llrrr r'orrrisls ol lreating the steel to about 50'F above the upper critical line versus absorbed energy. The magnitude of measured energy, shape of energy
,4, lrrrl tlrlrr ltttttittt cortling slowly. The purpose is to refine the grain and curve, and appearance of the cross section of tested specimens are all significant
rtrlttr'r srtllttr'ss in evaluating material toughness.
4.5 BRITTTE FRACTURE
ffil
| | '-*nn
fn',n
ingly low for .4-387 steels. Recognizing this fact is imperative in specifying
energy requirements for various steels at different temperatures.
The slope of the energy curve in Fig. 4.11 gives the rate of change of steel
toughness with increasing temperature. At the bottom shelf of the curve, the
(a) srnolno specruel steel is very brittle as indicated by the cleavage appearance of the tested speci
(b) resr ann*rormeu
men. Failure is normally abrupt. At the upper shelf, material fails in shear and
- the cross section has a dull area. Failure bicurs after excessive yielding. [ow]
W,q sharp increase in toughness as the temperaiure increases,
--.r-o"ttgm;f"@Slt
as sho_wnin_Curve,4 qf Fig. 4 1 l. @
-. as-sharu!_!J_ rfrrvx g-rn-\E:-.4.1t. This slight increase in toughness makes the
Cv test impractical to use in high strength steels.
The of dull and areas in the cross section of tested
(Fig. 4.10c).
(c) pencert or sxeln rnlctune
AFTEB TESTII'IG.
Fig'rre ,1.10 Chorpy V-notch sp€c'men.
nil ductility temperature.
The nil ductility transition (NDT) temperature shown in Fig. 4.11 is of
significant importance when considering low strength steels. This temperature is
below which the fracture appearance of steel changes from part shear to com-
plete cleavage. Thus, this temperature is below which vessels with low strength
steel must not operate without a detailed fracture evaluation.
The Cv tests give a good qualitative indication of fracture hends. TlpylQlot,
however. eive anv coffelation between enersv and stress levels. Such informa-
tion G-neeh wriirJ i-strisianaiviii is ftooila. roitrti.-iJ*n. other methods
were devised such as the drop weight test {DWT) established by the U.S. Naval
=
s Research. Laboratory .
I
Drup We@ht Test (DWT)
z
The DWT procedure is given in ASTM E-208 and consists of welding a brittle
bead on a test specimen. The bead is then notched and the specimen impact
I l$ted at various temperatures. The NDT temperature is obtained when the
specimen does not break upon impact.
In testing the specimens, deflection can be limited such that the stress at
failure does not exceed the yield value. Thus, a direct correlation is established
between the NDT temperature and yield stress. Such information is used in
constructing the fracture analysis diagram (FAD).
cuRvi(A) CURVE(s)
The FAD is one of the earliest applications of brittle fracture rules to fail-safe
designs. The results obtained from the curve are very conservative but require
64
-/
the minimum in engineering analysis. A simplified version of the diagram for stressed to a certain level and heated from one side to create a temperature
low strength steels is shown in Fig. 4.12 and indicates the types of tests required gradient as shown in Fig. 4.13.
to construct the diagram. Figure 4.14 shows the complete fracture analysis diagram. The range of flow
Point A is obtained from the DWT and it establishes the location of the NDT sizes at various stress levels has been obtained from experiments as well as
temperature with respect to yield stress. The crack arrest temperature (CAT) experience. The experiments consisted of using large spheres of good impact
curve, developed by the Naval Research Laboratory is obtained by running material and replacing portions of them with a notched brittle material. The
explosive tests on sample plates at various temperatures and observing the crack spheres were then pressurized to a given stress level at the NDT temperature of
pattem. From such tests the fracture tear elastic (FTE) point is determined at the the brittle material. The size of the notch was varied with different stress levels
temperature at which the crack pattem changes from bulge and fracture to bulge to obtain the range in the figure.
and partial fracture, as shown in Fig. 4.12. The fracture tear plastic (FTP) point
is obtained when the crack pattem changes from bulge and partial fracture to
bulge and shear tears. The FTE point also locates the yield stress with respect
to temperature, whereas the FTP point locates the ultimate stress.
Below point A in Fig. 4.12, fracture does not propagate regardless of the
temperatue as long as the stress is below 5-8 ksi. Between points A and other I
stress lines are drawn to correlate various stress levels. These lines are obtained mpAcT
from the Roberson test, which consists of impact testing a specimen that is
ERiP
Figure 4.13 Diosrom of specimen urd in Roberrson crock-drrBr bsr.
0{DT+60"F) ( DT+120'F)
YIELD
TEMP+ srnEss
ls
lz
T
lKl
M lft\ ll
"
tet
L_________J
,BULGE'
tL) I
I
FLAT" BULGE "BuLGE"
FRACTIJRE & & &
FRACTURE PARTIAL SHEAR =
FRACTURE TEABS riloT (NI'I+3o'F) (NDT+60'F) (NDT+r20'F)
TEMe-.-
Figurc 4.12 Frocluro onolFis diogrom. Fisuro 4.14 Generdliz€d frocture onolysis d,osrom.
MATERIATS OF CONSTRUCTION 4,5 BRITTLE FRACTURE 69
NDT + 120'F. This indicates that for thick sections, Fig. 4.14 is on the ,4O
unconservative side and the safe operating temperature should be greater ":l 30
Cl 20
than those indicated by the figure. El 10
El
4l o
Example 4.2. A low-carbon steel material with NDT temperature of 15"F is -l
ul -1o
used in a pressure vessel. What is the rninimum safe operating temperature for Ft -20
-30
such material?
_40
-50
Solution. Because no stress level is given, the minimum stress is assumed at -60
yield. Entering Fig. 4.14 at yield stress, the CAT curve is intersected at the FTE or11+22+3
point. Moving vertically, a temperature of NDT + 60"F is obtained. Thus, the THICKNESS
minimum safe opemting temperature is 75'F.
If stress concentrations are assumed in the vessel and the stress level is beyond GRoUP A: Nonnallzed SA-442 over 1,0 ln.
orinrl ized 5A-516 And sA-662
yield at some areas, then a conservative design is at the FTP point. In this case,
the safe operating temperature is NDT + 120'F, or 135'F. I GRoUP 8: SA-442 over 1.0 In. I'lhen l{ot Nonnallzed
5A-516 Up To 1,5 In. Thick
Solution. From the CAT curve in Fig. 4. 14 the minimum safe temperature is
at NDT + 30" or 1ffF for a stress of one-half yield. Thus, start-up temperature
is on the unsafe side because it is less than 10'F. If start-up temperature is
The above approach, although different from the FAD concept, is a practical
critical, the shess will have to be decreased or a better impact material se-
tool for preventing brittle fracture without requiring elaborate analysis; it is
lected. I based on test data.
4.5.1 ASME Pressure Vessel Criterio The FAD and ASME criteria are applicable to low-carbon steels where the
effect of temperature is prominent. Toughness of higher strength steels or mate-
The ASME Code, VIII, uses a different approach for preventing brittle fracture rials such as stainless steels, aluminum, or titanium is independent of tem-
in pressure vessels with carbon steel construction. Division 1 prohibits the use perature. Thus, a different approach based on the mathematical theory of frac-
of some carbon steels below -20'F and requires impact testing of all others that ture toughness is used in establishing adequate toughness.
are subjected to temperatures below -20"F, with some minor exceptions. Di-
vision 2 uses a more refined approach that takes into account the effect of Example 4.4. A 3.O-in.-thick pressure vessel is made of SA-533 Gr. B mate-
material type, thickness, and temperature. Figure 4.15 is a simplified version of rial with an NDT temperature of 0'F. The design temperature is 50"F and the
the code approach. It exempts some tough materials of a given thickness from design membrane sffess is three-fourths of yield. What are the code fracture
impact testing when the service temperature is above a specific value given in requirements of this vessel if it is constructed in accordance with (a) Division I
the filure. of Section VIII, (b) Division 2 of Section VIIL
MATTRIALS Of CONSTRUCTION
4.5 BRITTTE TRACTURE 7l
Solulian. (a) Because the temperature is over -20"F, Division I does not
configuration of the body and crack. Thus K1 can be expressed by
require any analysis.
(b) From curveD ofFig. 4.15, the minimum temperature that exempts impact
requirements for a 3.0-in.thick vessel is 120'F. Thus a Cy test is manda- &=oF (4.l)
tory. I where F : crack shape factor.
4.5.2 Theory of Brittle Frocture
Unstable crack propagation occurs when the value of K1 reaches a critical
value K1c, which is a function of the properties of the material. Temperature
Basically the brittle fracture theory assumes that stress at the vicinity of a crack
variation could have a drastic effect on the value of K1c. as is the case with low
(Fig. 4. 16) due to a load applied perpendicular to the direction of crack is given
strength carbon steels.
by the following expressions:
Some published K/c values are given in Table 4.7. Experimental deter-
mination of the Krc factors is described in ASMT E-399 and is rather costly to
. 0 30\
".:#(*":)(' - '... . -... ,, I
-stn-stn-l
-/
establish.
Values for the crack shape factor F are normally obtained from the theory of
.: #(*":)(' -i,a30\
srn;
"
srn ,-/ ,
elasticity. Because of the complexity of such analysis, only a few cases are
suited for practical use. Some of them are shown in Table 4.8.
Materials in general lose their toughness as the yield strength increases. One
T4= ./^ |1.0
K,
Sln; cos; cos r,
0 3a\ measure of toughness is the ratio K16 f or. Ratios larger than I .5 indicate tough
vzTIT\ z z z/ materials, whereas lower ratios indicate more brittle materials. A study ofK16/o,
and Eq. 4.1 reveals that the defect factor F has to be very small when o" is high
where a,, o], 7ry = stress components at a point (ksi) and K1q is low. In other words, very small defects in high strength materials can
lead to catastrophic failures.
r, 0 = polar coordinates from tip of crack
Fracture theory is one the most accurate methods presently available for
Kt : fracine toughness factor (ksiV-in) evaluating maximum tolerable defect size. The main drawback is the difficult
task of obtaining I</c factors for different materials. Economics might dictate a
The fracture toughness factor K1 is a function of applied load as well as the simplified approach like FAD or the ASME criteria with a small permissible
defect size rather than a fracture theory approach that might allow a larger
tolerable defect.
tft Relatiaiship Between K1g and Cy
Determination of K1c values is tedious and expensive especially for low strength
JK/c (ksi\-inJ
Material - 300"F -200'F - 100"F
A302-Gr. B 25 34 48
,A.5l7-Gr. F 34 44 7'7
A203 Gr. A norm. 38 50
A203 Gr. A Q and T 83
A.533 Gr. B 35 40 46 78
Figure 4.16 Elostic srres, distribulion neor rhe tip of
HV-80 55
Tqble 4.8 Shope Foclors for Common Configurolions
Tqble 4.8 Shope Foctors for Comrnon Configurolions (Coniinued)
case l: Flovl in a sheet of inf inlte vrldth. Case 4: Internal elliptic flow jn a thlck plate
l"
3t . If .a2
(
6 E-
E-'g_ E_ Rer'
F=V ra l,ihere u2a' is the ni nor axiiss and "2c"
" is the maior axl s
73
74 MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION 4.5 BRITTTE FRACTURE 75
steels. Various methods relating the,K/c factor to the relatively inexpensive Cy 4.5.4 Foctors lnfluencing Britlle Froclure
test have been suggested. One empirical method proposed by Rolfer and Barsom
consisted of preparing two equations for correlation purposes. One equation Many factors such as torch cutting, arc strikes, and cold forming affect the britde
relates the Cy and K1s values at the transition temperature region, whereas the fracture behavior of metals and should be considered in fabricating pressure
other equation is applicable at the upper shelf region. Thus, for the hansition vessels. Torch cutting or beveling of the plate edges may lead to hard and brittle
region,6 areas. In cases where this condition is underdesirable the plate should be heated
to minimize this effect. Grinding the edges eliminates the hard surfaces.
Krc:155Cvtl2 (4.2) Arc strikes can create failure by brittle fracture especially if the strike is made
over a repaired area. It is desirable to grind and repair all arc strikes before
whereas for the upper shelf range, hydrotesting, especially at low temperatures.
Cold forming of thick plates may lead to fracture in areas with stress raisers
or plate scratches. All stress raisers should be ground off to minimize their
f&Y:4ofQ-o.r)
\ov./ \sr /
(4.3)
effect. Hot-forming substantially improves the situation because it increases the
NDT temperature and thus prevents brittle fracture.
where Cv is in ft-lb, o" in ksi, and K1g in ksivG. Equations 4.2 and 4.3 are for
medium strength steels such as 4.517 Gr. F and 4302 Gr. B.
Example 4.5, A titanium pipe (ASTM 8265 Gr. 5) with a 2.375-in. outer
4.5.3 Hydroslotic Testing diameter and a 0.154-in. wall thickness has an actual stress of 30 ksi. a vield
stress of 120 ksi, and K1q :
40 ksiVin at a given temperature. The pipe
Hydrostatic testing of a pressure vessel is the best available method for deter- contains a flow of depth 0.05 in. and length 0.25 in., which is similar to case
mining maximum tolerable defect size. Thus, if a thick pressure vessel is 6 of Table 4.8. What is the maximum internal pressure the pipe can hold?
hydrotested at a pressure that is 50% greater than the design pressure, the critical
K1 is given by Eq. 4.1 as
Solutian. From a conventional strength of material analysis, the pressure
required to yield the pipe is given by Fig. 5.4 as
K1g = oF
a\Rl - Rl) -
'^
Assuming an intemal defect represented by case 3 of Table 4.8, the maximum 120(1.88'z 1.034':)
K16 immediately after hydrotesting is Rl - Ri r.88r - r.034,
Krc: t.5
/ I;\
r.(r\/;J Using fracture toughness approach, maximum stress is
Krc
Maximum defect size r at the design pressure is given by F
Hence, a crack that is discovered after hydrotesting can grow 2.25 times its ^ tll.4(t.88)2- t.0341 :
maxr: 14Jl(sl
original size before causing failure. This fact illustrates the importance ofhydro- ll8' r l034':
testing and is based on a hydrostatic temperature that is the same as the lowest
operating temperature of the vessel. 'l'hcrclirre liacture toughness criteria control the design. I
NONMETATTIC VESSEIS 77
MATERIAIS OF CONSTRUCTION
76
to be used
Examnle 4'6. An A302-B material with a yield stress of 50 ksiofisthe percent
irl The Cv value is 15 ftlb and an examination
".!*"* "".r"1.
#"i^il;; .rott ...,i* of tested specimens indicate a temperature in the
plarc uncovered an elliptical
transition range. Ultrasomc examination of the
il;;;;d. fit" surface that is 0.375 in long and 0 25 in deep How safe is
the vessel if the operating stress is I yield?
5
Solution. From Eq 4'2' K1g = 15(15)0 = t9 ksiVin-
From Table 4.8, case 4, 1C;-Yr Mo Stccl
\/;ajzr
F=
;ts+l;ts,,oI25/orus" - "-"
Hence, from Eq' 4'1, o-: 19/0'46: 41 ksi Actual stress : x So = r:
Therefore' operation'lof the vessel
i.fl*fit"rt it l_es's,rtan the critical brittle stress
is safe unless the defect grows in size l
4.6 HYDROGENEMBRITTLEMENT
BIBLIOGRAPHY
and fi lament-winding Processes.
In the contact-mol,cling process reinforcements and resins are placed in a cast
Aluminum Standards aM Data, Alrmin'um Association, Washington, D.C., 19'19.
mold and cured at room temperature. Vessels constructed by this process are
Alner, S. H.,Introduction to Phlsical Metallurgy, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964.
limited to a design pressure of 150 psi.
Nichols, R. W -, Pressule Vessel Engineering TechnologJ, Applied Science Publisherc, England,
In the bag-molding process a pressurized bag is used to compress Prerolled t91l
and heads preforms against an outer heated mold The
.
fiberglass Thielsch, H., Defects and Failures in Pressure Vessels akd PipinS, R. E. Krieger, New York,
"!hnd".t
uessels conjtructed by this process are also limited to 150 psi pressure' 1965.
In the centrifugal casting process, the cylindrical sections are formed from
chopped fiberglasi strands and a resin system in a mandrel, which is spun to
oroduce a suitible laminate and heated to cure the resin system Pressure vessels
constructed by this method are also limited to 150 psi design pressure'
In the filamenrwinding process, filaments of glass and resin are wound in a
systematic manner to form various components. The ASME code limits the
pressure range to 1500 psi for filament-wound vessels with cut filaments and to
i000 psi for filament-wound vessels with uncut filaments'
FRi' vessels normally operate at low temperatres. The ASME Code, Section
X, limits the temperature iange between a minimum of -65oF and a maximum
of 150'F. Also, because the modulus of elasticity is about 1 103 ksi, special x
care must be exercised in designing various components Because of this and
because different fabrication processes produce different strength vessels, the
ASME Code states that in order for a given vessel to be adequate, a prototype
must be cycled 100,000 times between zero and design pressure and then burst
at a Dressure not less than six times the design pressure'
REFERENCES
Pellini, W. S., "Principles of Fracture Safe Design-Part l" ln Pressure Vessels and Piping:
Design and A'',,lysis, Vol. l, American Society of Mechanical Engineers'
New York' 1972
Tetelman. A. S., and A. J. McEvily, Jr' Fracture of Structural Materidlt, John Wiley ' New
York, 1967.
Rolfe. S. T., and J. M Ba$om F/(r cture anal Fatig e Control in Structures' Prentice-Hall'
Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1977.
Water Reactor
Riccardella, P. C., and T. R. Mager, "Farigue Crack Growth in hessunzed
Vessels" in Pressare ye ssels and Piping: Disigtl and Analysis, Vol l, American
Society of
Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1972.
Roberts, R., and Newton, "lnterpretive Repoft on Small-Scale-Test Conelations with f''
C
DaA," Welling Rcs\rch Council' Bulletin 265, New York' | 981'
PART2
ANALYSIS OF
COMPONENTS
8l
CHAPTER 5
STRESS IN CYLINDRICAL
SHELLS
Atr'0|t|h,t|.otcy|lndr|co|lh!|hinochomicolP|on|'(cour|g,yofE.|.dUPontdaNomoursondco.)
83
11 3TR!IS IN CYTINDRICAI gHErrS 3,I STRI3E DUE TO INTTRNAT PRESSURE
85
Thc classic equation for determining stress in a thin cylindrical shell subjected
to pressur€-is obtained from Fig. 5.1. Summation of forces perpendicular to
plane ABCD gives
PL.2r:ZoeLt
Figur€ 5,2
ot= Pr (s.1)
Also,
T
dw
where p = g€ssure (s.3)
ar
Z = length of cylinder deflection of a cylindncal shell subjected to internal pressure
the.radj4 is
o, = hoop stress obtained by subsdrudng rhe quantity e6: osf E in6 Eq.
5.i. ilnce for thin
cvllnoers
r = radius
I = thickness
(s.4)
The stain ee is defined as
where
final length - original length E = modulus of elasticity
original length
and from Fig. 5.2, Equations 5.1 and 5.4 give accurate results when r/r >
10. As r// decreases,
however, a more accurate expression is needed because the stress distribution
2t(rIw)-2rr through the thickness is not uniform. Recourse is then made to the,.thick
shell,,
€0= theory' first developed by Lame. The derived equations are based on the
z1fr forces
and stresses shown in Fig. 5.3. The theory assumes that all shearing
---;- stresses are
zero due to symmetry and thal a plane section that is normal
to thjongitudinal
axls pressure is applied remains plane after pressurization. In other
-betore
w words, e1 is constant at any cross section.
(s.2) A relationship between oi and_o1 can be obtained by taking a free_body
_.
diagram of ring dr as shown in Fig. 5.30. Summing ior"", ii the vertical
direction and neglecting higher-order tdrms, we then h-ave
do,
ae- o, = dr (5.5)
o,
(l + rr)(1 - 2*rl+(t - + + e)l
\.
Flgor.5.l Fr€c-body diogrom ol d rylindricol $ell lubi.ctod to intarnol prerlure. 1t) p,(e, I
I
86 5.I STRESS DUE TO INTERNAT PRISSURE 87
w = -t . *n--t=A
.€1
Once w is obtained, the values of o6 and d; are determined from Eqs. 5.2, and
5.3, and 5.6 and expressed for thick cylinders as
whcre A and B are constants of integration and are determined by first substi- oI= EeI+2p(\? - !"31
tuting Eq. 5.7 into the first one of Eq. 5.6 and then applying the boundary r;- ri
conditkrns
This equation indicates thato1 is constant throughout a cross section because €r
o,: -Pi at r= ri is constant and r does not appear in the second term. Thus, from Fig. 5.7 the
expression ot can be obtained ftom statics as
rnd
4r? - P"r'z.
(5.10)
o, = _p, ,2_.?
ljxorrulon 5.7 then becomes With or known, Eq. 5.8 for the deflection of a cylinder can be expressed as
6=tr,..t!id-
- f;-Ji \ J' I)
"'=-++r(#)
surr.ce
Ar Inne.
+=t+
)=-t
surraco
.Ai
Ourer
+="#
ft=o
Figurc 5.4 Slrca! dishibdion in o rfiick cytirder du. to inrornol prcrlur€.
,,=#e#)
At fnnersurtace
"r=ffi
ft=o
aroorersurfaca
"r-#ifl
9=_r.o
P"-
Figuro 5,5 Str€ls dithibt ion in o thick cylin&r due l,o enornol pr.3sur€.
88
90 STRESS tN CYr"tNDRtCAt SHtrrs 5.I STRESS DUE TO INTTRNAI PRESSURT 9l
Example 5.1. The inside radius of a hydraulic cylinder is 12.0 in. What is the
required thickness if P :
7500 psi and a6 = 20,000 psi? loe +p
, = /l "\ /--------= -
Solulinn. From membrane Eq. 5.1
: 5.80 in.
t=-:
Pr 7500 x 12
22Eo. I
Hence, the error of using Eq. 5.1 in this case is
oo 20,000
= 4.50 in. Example 5.2. A cylinder has an inside radius of 72.0 in. and an internal
pressure of 50 psi . What is the required thickness if the allowable stress is 1 5 ,000
psi, 1.r
: 0.3, and E = 30 x 10o Psi?
')
: O.24 in.
External Pressure
and from Fig. 5.8,
Problcms
All the previous equations were based on the assumption that the cylinder is free which indicates that N, must be a constant.
to deform under pressure. In practical applications, the cylinder is attached to Let
end closures that reshain its deformation. Other items such as stiffenirg rings
and internal bulkheads affect the cylinder deformation and introduce local N,:0
stesses. These local shesses can be evaluated by a dicontinuity-type analysis
using the general bending theory of thin cylindrical shells. The theory assumes Also,
that the loads are symmetric around the circumference and that the thickness of
the shell is small compared with its radius. It is also assumed that the in-plane
shearing forces and moments are zero. The problem then reduces to that of >4=0
solving the forces shown in Fig. 5.9. The relationship between these forces can
be obtained from statics. Hence, from Fig. 5.9,
d?'+at=r
>4:0 dxr
(s.12)
Similarly,
ff*,ar=o 2M,=o
94 3TRE5S IN CYIINDRICAT SHETIS 5.2 DISCONTINUITYANAIYSIS 95
*-a.=o
ax
(s.l3) ee= -i
w
(5.18b)
Deleting Q, from F4s. 5.12 and 5.13 gives Substituting expressions 5.18a and 5.18b into Eq. 3.11 gives
N, + d2M,
---:--l : r (5.14) y,=.Et ;1r,r p,e6)=o
-r ta- t' - lt-
This equation has two unknowns, N6 and M,' Both unknowns can be
expressed
by Eq'
in t".-, of,h" O"flection w. The relationship between M' and w is
given
3.1I as du: /w\
dx lLl-
= \r/
|
Et' (s'15)
D,= rro=E
the a-direction is zero due to (5.19)
Because the rate of change of deflection in
symmetry, the above two equations reduce to
Substituting Eqs. 5.16 and 5.19 into Eq. 5.14 yields
-r(**) (s. 16)
".= u4*r(*\:-,
and
r' \dx+ /
_*(#) Defining
",: no: Lt ".il
- lL-)
-Jlt (s.20)
4r2D r2t2
Me = FM, (s.17)
the differential equation becomes
'l'hc cxprcssion for No is derived from the axial and hoop strains' In refening to
liil, 5.9, thc uxitl strain is given by (5.21)
ffi*oon*=-+
du (5.l8a)
ax where p is a function of .r.
)
96 tTRlSt tN CYUNDRTCAT SHlrtg 5,2 DISCONTINUIIY ANAIYSIS i7
One of the most practical applications of Bq. 5.21 is for long cylinders subjected
io end shears and moments as shown in Fig. 5.10. The force and deformation
a.l._,= n"= -,(#)1."
distribution at any point r along the cylinder due to O0 and M0 can be obtained
from Eq. 5.21 with P = 0. Hence, Hence,
aw .'.'*-"".--",
;i+4p.w:o _ -l
^ct=;;7i(Qo + Bmsli
LP tl
;
, :;fu<oro"* + escp)
#= *1roU""ctu+ S.AP)
(s.24)
t:=$aor"os+zeoD,,)
# = jour,De'- enBB,)
Values of Ap,, BB,, CB,, ar]d Dg, are given in Table 5.1.
Using the terminology of Eqs . 5 .23 and 5 .24 , the expressions for M, arfi Q,
Figur.5.l0 are represented by
98 sTRtss tN CYUNDRtCAt SHEttS 5,2 DISCONTINUITYANATYSIS 99
Tqblr 5.f Vqfurr of functiqng Ap* Bp- Cp. Dp, Toble 5.2 Vqrious Disconlinuity Funclions
2.00 0.0667
-0.1985 -0.0376
0.1231
E;r'- iPo ^p,
-0.r794 -0.0563
q9 . zB2.o,t4lrr -cr, ?$ D'ed DB, -aB")
2.50 -0.0166 -0.1149 -0.0658 0.0491 D-
B FX
3.00 -0.0423 -0.0563 -0.0493 0.0070
3.5 -0.0389 -o.0177 -0.0283 -0.0106 Ne zlioB2.r.Br, 28. r. Qo. CBx !1. ao ( 2ce
" -8." :.t.00(c^
F-3- p'
-8" )
6.0 0.0017 0.0031 0.0024 -0.0007 'clockwise moments and lotation arc positive at point 0. Outward forces and deflections arc
't.o 0.0013 0.0001 0.0007 0.0006 positive at point 0. Me = tir|..
that 0 momcnt epplicd at thc cnd dissipatewery rapidly and reduces as much as To find the maximum moment M,, the above equation can be differentiated
94% ofthe original momcnt atr = l.56Vrt. This indicates that any other force with respect to r and equated to zero. Hence,
applied ot that distance x can be analyzed without regard to the applied moment
Mo' I
Example 5.4. A long cylinder is subjected to end shear ps. Plot the value of *, = sinA
M, as a function of C0 from Fx : 0 to Fx = 4.0 and derive the location of the 3.e-&
maximum value of M,.
ff =o= sin Bx * Be-tu cos Bx)
ftr-Ou*
Solutinn, From Eq. 5.25,
,'=*o^
Referring to Table 5. 1 for values of D p,, a plot of M,/ (Qo/B) can be constructed
as shown in Fis. 5.11.
and maximum moment is given by
, _ o.34Qo I
Example 5.5. Determine the expression for the deflection of a long cylinder
with end closures due to intemal pressure p.
Solutinn. For intemal pressrre p, the axial force it 7'1, = pr/Z and the hoop
force is Ne = pr. Also from Eqs. 3.11 and 5.18,
PrEtlw\
z r-F-\"lexr lr-l
==:- r/
and
Pr (l - 2tt)
q ''Et2
'ry and
trlxomple 5.6. A
STNESS IN CYTINDRICAT SHELTS
(a) The discontinuity stress in the shell with the ring assumed to have
Figuro 5.13 Sign conv6ntion oi poini 0, clockwiss 0 ond i4" ore + , outword w dnd Q. oro -
infinite rigidity .
(b) The discontinuity stress in the shell and ring if the ring has a thickness
of 0.375 in. and a depth of 4.0 in. From Eq. 5.15,
Solution. D= 0.00143 E
tl(r-E\ -4 +!!=:o
E.r \' 21 2B3D zB'D
Qo-ZBUo:g e)
Mo : 321'4 in.Jb/in'
.=N.ry
= 40,900 psi
tigure 5.12
Me = 96.4 in.-lb/in.
tTRttt tN cruNDRrcat sHttls !.2 DISCONTINUITY AI,IATYSIE t0t
l0.l
2Qor(r + 2)
-,
"r
Etw
'= - bdE
0=0
But because w = 0, N6 is equal to zero and the maximum hooP stress is
Due to Mo,
*:T*,", w=0
d=0
The deflection comPatibilitY is
O) The shell deformations are expressed as follows:
Due to R
-1-', wp - wQo* ,*]"' - ,o + *roof^"
, - p,-'-
",
- ='#l'- i) {
,i( - t) -
#. #=,*#!".'3e#2
L'=o *-*-- I
?Y'oo'
Mo - 4.0@o: -296'8 (3)
Sirnilarly,
Due to Mo,
Mn
':t9o
-Mo
@ and
2BMs-20=g (4)
The ring deformations are expressed as follows:
Due to p,
Solving Eqs. 3 and 4 yields
pr(r + d/2\
n=- dE Mo = 152'0 in-lb/in.
pr
O,: -- r, ---:---
2Qor Pr
aDa
oe:::20'000Psi
= 1250 + 7370
Problams
= 8620 psi
5.4 A long cylindrical shell is welded at one end to a rigid bulkhead such that
Maximum longitudinal stress in cylinder is the deflection and rotation due to applied pressure are zero. If r = 36 in.,
I = 0.5 in., p : 240 psi. lt: 0.3, and E = 29 x 10" psi, what is the
Pr . ---A-
6Mn
maximum lonsitudinal stress?
O'=
- -
zt I-
_ 100x50 x6x t5?
. Pr -:E- 3Pr
Answet: a= zt
n'T tv3\t _ p2)
2x 0.25
(0.25).
: 24,600 psi
: 40,015 psi
Hoop force at discontinuity is f,.f, The shell in Problem 5.4 is welded to a thin bulkhead such that only the
deflection is zero due to applied pressure. What is the maximum
discontinuity stress?
. o= Pr 0.966Pr
z *;'Fyt - u31
where Answeri
w=lt,p-wgo*wyo
= 18,740 psi
=P"(,-E\- Q, * uo
E \' 21 2B3D 2B2D
5.2.2 Short Cylinders
_ M7,500
E
It was shown in Eq. 1 of Example 5.3 that the applied edge forces in a long
cylinder dissipate to a small value within a distance of l.56Vrr. This basic
behavior enables the designer to discard the interaction between applied loads
.. = E (0.25)(447 ,sOO/ E) when they are far apart. As the cylinder gets shorter, the assumption of long
'", -- 50 cylinders does not apply and constants C1 and C2 in Eq. 5.8 must be considered.
= 2238 lb/in. Consequently, Eqs. 5.23 and 5.24 have to be modified to include the effect of
all four constants. Equation 5.8 may be rewritten in a different form as
and hoop stress at discontinuitv is
w = Ar sin Bx sinh Bx * 42 sin Pt cosh Bx
No . 6Me *A3 cos Bx sinh pt + A4 cos Br cosh B-r 6.26)
oe=----1----r-
T T-
Example 5.7. Derive Np for the case of applied bending moment M6 at edge
5
s ,Tlri
-:- r = 0 for a short cylinder of length l.
:s dld,-------, -- Solution:
,-----..-- dl6
The four boundary conditions are:
Jr ulu v:{v At.r:0
UIU :9 dle | +
r $16 +F ".A.E.E
66aa
5d :E $16 T k k,al ,5 _,(*\ =,"
dld +
-i=._, : d \ax-,/
i<'F
t>.
:s,1, €1. s
+<'
< (a,
l+ri
d.d.&&d.d{d -,(*\
\dx' /
= o
e.eAP)'eAAe atx:
S .--- '=-
.ir ,:
s.d.&6.{&ds. I
--:- --r d|U } - ":"* iiifriEEE
E5r!666a
f- -i-.ir
f-"i-clo
dl6<ilr-, *.. sr tilri
f ltltllllllllllll -,(*\: o
, 5ss>":lss:s \ax- /
r s ",-
>' '-i- dlu
dl6 + _,(*\:o
riltiril6 + f,
i -i- ..i..
* >- dld
ru,
>,' _ ,u
\ax'/
s;' >"
)J --.:
L-J dlu
(JlU €
dlddlu F f - S
Ec:i
€lcq R $l* i
From Eq. 5.26, the second derivative is given by
. : _M^
3 t_,Y dl.: s
t l-. tTlri :g
| ."T..v,
dt6, E s'
.: .l ,i .1 ,1 rt q,
2D B,
(t
"--l =;+
sls slS-E- ht Substituting Eq. 2 into the second boundary condition gives
Az: At
-9
.o
q and from the third and fourth boundary conditions the relationships
F €
108
il0 3TRT33 IN CYIINDRICAI 9HEITS I.2 DISCONTINUITY ANAI.YSIS ltl
Mo lsin Pl cos Pl + sinhB/coshB/
A3 = Dtr \--GF7t:;tnT--
and
: Et*
N,
r
Ft (
= 1(Ar sin ft sinh ft * Az sin Fx cosh Fr
+ A3 cos Br sinh Bx + A+ cos Fr cosh Fr) (3)
Using the values of A1, A2, A3, Aa obtained above and the terminology of Table l_*
t-
,,
5.3, Eq. 3 reduces to
"r I
(b)
Figure 5.1,1
c, t'r f C"
N, = "' ;i*; | -sin pr sinh p1 + ::1sin Bx cosh Bx + cos Pv sinh Fx)
r U)15'| Lt
Cr = O.2028 Cz = 1.1164
C,
- Fx cosh Pr Ct = 1.5444 Cr : 0.5481
frcos I
C5 0.4568 Ce = 0.6596
=
or U=o.272r yl=0.4006
Vq = 1.4984 V: 0 8707
n, = ZrMoF'( -v,
\
* !v,
ct - !v,\
Lt ,/
r %=0.5986 V=0.949s
Example 5.8. Determine the maximum shess at point A of the thin cylinder Thus the expression for wo due to P is given by
in Fig. 5.lzla. I*t p' = 9.3.
and with B2 : 1.0495 nd D2 = 0.00145 E, the equation becomes " =ry =6Q-'?77:\ = 2s.e P psi
0.252
144'O2P - 288'S2Qo + 436'59M0 = 2983OQo - 313 'O7Mo Thb circumferential bending moment is given by
or Mo = drI" = 0.08 P
(1)
5 '2O6Mo - 4'M7Qo: -P The circumferential force N6 is given by Eq. 5.19 as
Mo = -0.27 P
0o = -0.08 P Probbm 5.6
I l4 STRESS IN CYTINDRICAT SHEtts 5,3 BUCKIING Of CYI.INDRICAL SHELTS 5
as dead
Most cylindrical shells are subjected to various compressive forces such
The behavior of cylindrical shells
weight, wind loads, earthquakis, and vacuum.
intemal pressure'
undlr ih"se compressive iorces is different from those under
In most instancei, the difference is due to the buckling phenomena that render rvr6" + aSoe
cylindrical shells weaker in compression than in tension'
Sturm3 used the system of fbrces in Fig. 5.15 to establish the buckling r"re +affoo
characteristics of cylindrical shells subjected to extemal comp-ressive
forces'
From the figure he derived a relationship between strains and deflections Using re+affae
this relatioiship and Eq. 3. 1 l, he obtained a of
system equations relates
.that
forces and moments to deflections. These equations together with the equi-
*$oe
librium equations determined from Fig. 5.15 result in the four basic differential r.r"=+ So' rvp" +$ae
equations for the buckling of cylindrical shells' a @o"
5.3. I Uniform Pressure Applied to Sides Only lrx +
Sox
For this case, the hoop force is
Ne=-Pr+f(x'0)
where/(x, g) is a function of and 0, which expresses the variation ofN0 from
.x
tt" an".uge uutue. Wtten the deflection w of the shell is very small,/(x, d) is also
u.ry ,-u- . Similarly, the axial and shear stresses are expressed by
N,:0+g(ir'0) Fisuro 5.15
Ne':O+h(x'0)
N'p=0+i(x'0) ..2 :=:;---------;1r"'z[N2,\2 - prti - lt - l]
n.- 3r \t - lt-)
Substituting these expressions into the four basic differential equations for the
buckling oi cylindrical shells, and using boundary conditions for simply sup- a * l.+ trlNz[l + (i t)(z-
oorted J.rds. tire solution for the elastic buckling of a simply supported cylindri- - AA
- tt)]- l}]
cal shell due to uniform pressure applied to sides only is given by
.,2:
L2 --n=
c.: rB(!\ 6.27a) d-r1
K=KtI
: poisson's ratio
"'(?)
I l6 STRISS IN CYLINDRICAT SHETLS 5.3 EUCKUNG OF CYUNDR|CA| SHttrS tt7
/nl
fi"T
$d
\J/ ,1,
P
{N'?[l + -r)(2- p)]- 1]
(^ n = ln, for side pressure only)
E *1;r"u.tr r\
(l P,r\ t | \u, tLL t
'{(t - $}tctt - pl + (1 + ri\ + a + 1 + p}I
t\ Ltl )
: 4
1 = moment of inertia
12 *(;l (s.27b)
A plot of the ( value in Eq. 5.27a based on the first two terms of expression F
"=
is shown in Fig. 5.17.
where &(Dj)
5.3.2 Uniform Pressure Applied to Sides ond Ends ": ",.
The values of No, N,e, and N6 are the same as those for pressure applied to sides ^:: ^tF ll7rl2L\
only. The value of N, is given bY F
A4 : A?;---------;;--
' -F + (n'r'/2Lt)
*^=+rge.ol
A plot of the K value in Eq. 5.27b using the first two terms of expression F
Substituting those expressions into the four basic differential equations for the is shown in Fig. 5.18.
r l8 STRESS IN CYLINDRICAT SHEtts 5.4 THERMAT STRESS I l9
P". : ( r6)(2e,ooo,r*,(q#)
P". = ll3 psi I
o,:n':
't\r/ o.6oE(t) (5.28) o= -q LTE for a uniaxial case (5.29a)
f,xample 5.9. A cylindrical shell with r : 30 in is simply supported at the where o = stress (positive values indicate tension)
cntl.. il L : l0 ft and t : A315 in., find the critical buckling pressure for a d:
runilirlrr applictl pressure to sides and ends. Let E
: 29 x 10" psi' coefficient of thermal expansion
AI : change of temperature (an increase is taken as positive)
Solttlirtlt
E = modulus of elasticity
t- : q.o
r If the same bar is restrained in two directions as shown in Fig. 5.19, the
2:
t
roo
(lcli)nnations due to 4 and 4, are calculated in the same manner as the uniaxial
tlolirrmation. The two compatibility equations then become
t20 sTRESs IN CYTINDRICAT SHEttS 5.4 THERMAT STRESS l2l
= -l (o"-
H +&r
aLT
\
Lro)
.lN
il----------'1--1
ti ]--t i "
\F
{ li-' _,|
a LT = -; (tr, -
\N
fI
p,rr,)
l--| \____J.i
l.,l 'l*-'-l L-,, L,. from which the expression
6t o.llE
(")
Ut : o' : --tl LTE
' t- p
T----l is obtained.
T l---lr In triaxial case, the thermal stress can be determined easily from the theory
a
I L
I
lll-
rl+ L- of elasticity. Substituting
results in
e: a LT in the first three expressions of Eq. 3.1
'r t N llt _J l*1,*'
= -a
o;- - o,: ct =
ATE
for a triaxial case (5.29c)
d = coeff. ol .rp.hsjon (b) ", | _ Zl"
dr- ch.nse 1n tenp. (positlve Hhen tenp. lncre.s.s)
T = Polssot's rrtlo
Figur.5.r9 Example 5.10. An intemal stainless steel rod is welded to the inside of a
carbon steel vessel as shown in Fig. 5.20. If the coefficient of thermal expansion
x x
is9.5 10 6 in./in.'F for the rod and 6.7 10-6 in.iin."F for the vessel, what
&-6r'+/'6"r=0 is the stress in weldA due to a temperature increase of400'F? Use E = 28 x
106
psr.
&+p8r,-6"r=0
Solution. Weld A is essentially subjected to a uniaxial stress. Hence,
where g, = proisson's ratio
6i", = deformation due to force 4 max 0: E La AT
6p, : deformation due to force F, = (28 x 109(9.s - 6.7)(10 9(400)
: 31,400 psi I
Solving the above two simultaneous equations gives
a LTE
for a biaxial case (5.29b)
1- tL
-(28 x 106)(9.5 -
o=@ 6.7X10-1(400)
-I Mo-nu
2PrD - BD:
(3)
Ifa more accurate result is desired, then a discontinuity-type analysis can be From Eq. 2, \:2FMo
performed. In referring nFig.5.2lb, and due to symmetry, the equations of From Eq. 3, n: 2BMo
compatibility and equilibrium can be written as From Eq. 4, 4: -4FMo
and Eq. 1 becomes
(a) ft=6r
(b) 0r=0
(c) 0z=0
#] = 1a", - a,,)(Af(r) (5)
(d) )F=0
From the above four equations, the four unknowns 4, Fz, Ft' and Mo can be
^l#.
obtained. Assuming the thickness of the cylinder is I= 0.1875 in. and using other given
Equation (a) can be written as values, the value of { from Eq. 5 is
The value of618 psi is significantly lower than the conservative value of44,800
psi obtained from Eq. 5.29b because of the ffexibility of the cylinder. If the
thickness of the cylinder is r :
3.0 in., then Eq. (5) gives
@l
(b) and the equation yields 4: -44,800 lbiin. or o = 44,800 psi compression in
Fisure 5.21 the weld, which is the same as that obtained from Eq. 5.29b. I
t24 STRESS IN CYIINDRICAI. SHELTS 5.4 THTRMAI. STRESS t25
5.4.1 Uniform Chonge in Temperolure M0 can be obtained tiom the second compatibility equation whereby the skrpc
in F\g. 5.22a at the interface is equal to the slope in (b). Or
H" M^ HN Mo M": O
(axA7i)(r) - t")tAl'ttn *
ffi* ffi= rp'o* ,Bo
and
from which
t\6<
Hn = @)(Lr1- AAX/)@)(D)
Max o: o.rrr-
= 20.500 psi
: -
(6.s x 10-6)(240 30)(6X1.4843f(5366)
The maximum bending moment due to I{0 was derived in Example 5.4 as
= 144 lb./in.
I' "--{';"' p/
lt psi
= n/4 is obtained
--14t"
,--. { ' li "o
Deflection due to flq zt Bx from Eqs. 5.23 and 5.24 as
'|
i-li
( 2 )Liquid ll o.322Ho
,=$ 2B"D
Hence,
(b)
Figwe 5.22
Ne = 827 lblin.
t26 sTxEss lN cYllNDRlcAt SHELl"S 5.4 THERAAAT STRESS 127
ln the
second compatibility equation the deflection due to temperature plus
end circumfcrcntial $trcss is
moment plus shear is equal to zero. Or
oo=
827 ^
0.3 x 12.000 : 10,200Psi
#+ o.$s +
#_#:o
Thus maxrmum stress occurs al rnterface with magnitude of 20,500 psi. I
and
Example 5.13. Determine the bending stress in a cylinder fixed at one edge Mo: (0.039)Qp2D)
(Fig. 5.23a) due to a uniform rise in temperature of 200"F.
: (0.039)(2X0.46941 (42.e30)
c = 6.5 x 10-6 in./in..F = 738 in.-lb/in.
E:30xl06psi :+
6M
o= = 70,800 psi I
p=o'3
5.4.2 Grsdient in Axiol Direction
Solution. Radial deflection of cylinder if ends are free is
The stress in a cylinder due to a thermal gradient f, in the axial direption can be
w : (a)(Afl(r) obtained by first subdividing the cylinder into infinitesimal rings of length dr.
: 0.039 in. Hence, the radial thermal expansion due to 4 in each ring is given by (c)(4)(r).
This expansion can be eliminated by applying an external force { such that
From Fig. 5.23a the rotation at the end is zero because the cylinder is fixed.
Hence deflection due to P, = deflection due to I
M" O^
BD zB,D
E= ",r,
= 2PMo Hence
Qo
p, = Etan
r
and
/1\-
lMo
Hs
-Pr :
ae: -l -taT. (5.30a)
Because the cylinder does not have any applied loads on it, the extemal force
P, usedto reduce the deflection to zero must be eliminated by applying an equal
and opposite force in the cylinder. Hence, Eq. 5.21 becomes
(b)
{!
tlx-
* aB'*:EJ$
fl,)
(5.30b)
Fisur€ 5.23
Itt STRTSS rN CYIINDRICAL SHEttS 5.4 THIR
'tAt
STRISS 129
Thc total strcss in thc cylindcr is dctcrmincd from Eqs. 5.30a and 5.30b. n-T
r =rx
Example 5.14. A vessel that operates at 800oF is supported by an insulated
skirt. The thermal distribution in the skirt is shown in Fig.5.24a.Ifthe top and and the circumferential stress due to ring action obtained from Eq. 5.30a is
bottom of the skirt are assumed fixed with respect to rotation, what is the
maximum stress due to temperature gradient? d = 7 x 10-o in./in.'F, p =
0.3,8= 30 x 106psi. ,,= -u"(T), (l)
Solutian, The equation for linear temperature gradient is E4uation 5.30b gives
The temperature change can be expressed as A particular solution takes the form
.="u$(Lf),*",
t- which upon substituting into the differential equation gives
aodF
and w reduces to
Tb= 2odF
w=rq.
e").
From Eq. 5.19
{a)
",=+:*(T) (2)
A
T x
'lr
t\
t
rv=(EJ,
)x=-sx
Adding Eqs. I and 2 results in
oe= 0
t\ which means that for a linear distribution the thermal stress along the skirt is
zeto.
The slope due to axial gradient is given by
J_/
(d
u
- = dw
--:- = rallT" - T,\
-----=;
Fhut. 5.21 dx\r/ I
gHEtts I.4 THIRMAT 3TRI33 |lr
rt0 3TRr93 lN CYI'INDRlCAt
dlt d , .f -E ,, *, ..,-(41\
T.;;"tr rt,\i)
and
I
,kl;ftt,'",t|: (s'37)
o= ,1450 psi
Solving the above differential equation and applying the boundary conditions
5.4.3 Grodient in Rodiol Direciion
gives
*: jl", - P(at + o)f + uT 6 32)
Ea-l_-+ P(r'z - r?
['" rra, [' rrar\
- J,,
-' = -:-------'--
o.
| - tt' r' \16 - ri J., /
u=|b,- p(a,+ os)l+ ar (5.33)
where d : inside wall temperature relative to outside wall temperature. - EaTt for inside surface
Cfe = C, = ,r,l _
!\r tL)
Substituting f into Eqs. 5.38 gives
EaT
(5.41)
ce: o,: Ltt
^- - lL) for outside surface
EaT, f (r2 r\zrt + r.) 2(r3-rl)-3r"(r2-r!)
' r'(l - 1t\ | -6(ri'r r")
rt-:
6(ri - r")
Case 2. Logarithmic Thermal Distribution
EeT f (r2 + r?)(2rt + r") 2\r3 - rl) - 3r"(r'z - r!)l
nr- -l
r-\t - pl L otrr r ro, o\r,
^
- ro) I
| \J.J')
In thick vessels, a steady-state thermal condition gives rise to a logarithmic
temperature distribution that can be expressed as
LAIi I zrt+ ro r"-rl
' (l - pll3(r1 + r,) r"- r,l
t: "/lu l"')
Figure 5.25 is a typical plot of o,, ae, and cz. The plot indicates that o, is \ln r" - ln r,/
relatively small compared with o6 and o,. For all practical purposes, o6 and o.
are equal.
and upon substitution of this expression in Eqs. 5.38 results in
The maximum values of op and ol occur at the inner and outer surfaces. From
8c.5.39.
'(;)l
2(l #cr.l'-'^?
u?T:,,
- *('. #)'(;)] (s.42)
r1, - 2Lnk-,t'i,,n/tr)l
"/ffi z(r - p,ntro/nL r ri-r; \/,/l
Again disregarding or as being small compared with o6 and o", Eqs. 5.42
have a maximum value of
I')tt'li From Eq. 5.38 it can be seen that cr, can also be expressed by Eq. 5.46.
tft: (r: - ,zt<l _ tl lirr insidc surlace
Example 5.15, A thin cylindrical vessel is heated by ajacket from the outside
oe: o, = Z\l _
EqT
lor outslde sunace such that the temperature distribution is as shown in Fig. 5.26.1f E 27 :
106 x
lD psi, a : x :
9.5 10-b in./in.'F, and p, 0.28, determine (a) maximum thermal
stress using Eq. 5.40 and (b) maximum thermal stress using Eq. 5.41.
which are the same as those for the linear case.
Solution. (a) 4: - 700 = -300'F. Hence at inside surface
400
Case 3. Complex Thermal Distribution
-(27 x t01(9.5 x tO-ox-300)/2(lJ) - t0\
ln many instances such as transient and upset conditions the temperature distri- - (t - 0.28) \3(13 - tO)i
bution through the wall of a vessel cannot be represented by a mathematical
expression. In this case a graphical solution can be obtained from the thermal = 55,800 psi
stress. From Eq. 5.38
and at outside surface
--
oe:
eq lt-rr,lf.'t'z[,.rrar-!f ,ror-r]
l- *l-rz,- r, 1, r- J,, (27 x 106)(9.5 x 10 6)(-300) lt3 + 2 x 10
I u= (l-028,
-- ,1 _ 92s1 \ :tr: _ rot
\3(13-lo)
For a cylinder where the thickness is small compared to the radius, the first = -51,000 psi
expression in the brackets can be expressed as
(b) For inside surface
I r trilrt2 p IrAr : 2r
-----';-'------- | --,- :
Ji: Trdr
r; - ri J,, ntr; - ril (-27 x 109(9.5 x l0 6)(-300)
= mean value of the temperature (5.44) '': 2(r - or2s)
distribution through the wall : 53,400 psi
oo: --\1n
.^ I) Ea (5.46)
-
I- IL
wncrc :
4n mean value of temperature distribution through the wall
thc wall is shown ln Fic..3.27 . Find thc msximum thcrmal stress at that instance.
Lct rr = 0.3, E = 3dx 106 psi, and a = 6.0 x 10-6 in./in."F
Solutlon. This problem can be visualized as a biaxial case where the inner
surfacs heats quickly while the rest of the wall remains at 300'F' Using Eq.
5.29b results in
(6 x l0-6x600 - 300x30 x
o:ffi 106)
= -77,100 psi
Locations as Temperature
Ratios of Thickness T Area
0 600
0.1 460 53.0
0.2 400 43.0 tisur' 5.27
0.3 370 38.5
0.4 340 35.5 sness occurs at the surface only. Thus at
It is of interest to note that the high
0.5 320 33.0 one-tenth of the thickness inside the surface, the stress is
0.6 310 31.5
0.7 305 30.8 __ (30 x 10ux9I_!o-1res6 _ 460)
t= r-o!3 \JJu 'uu''
0.8 300 JU.J
0.9 300 30.0 = -26,700 psi
1.0 300 30.0
>355.6 The high stress at the inner surface indicates that local yielding will occur. I
And I'
= 356"F.
From Eq. 5.46, at inner surface, NOMENCTATURE
2. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler ond Prcssure vessel Code, Sdct/.rn yrrl-
Mp ' hoop bcnding momcnt
Rules for Constructiotr of Pressure Vessels, Division 1, ANSI/ASME BVP-VI -l,NewYork,
p = pressure 1980 Edition.
3. Strum, R. G., "A Study of lhe Collapsing Pressue of Thin-Walled Cylinde$," University of
P", = buckling pressure Illinois Bulletin, Vol. XXXIX, No. 12, 1941.
P/ = internal pressure
Po = extemal pressure BIBI-IOGRAPHY
O, = shearing force
The Amedcan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Ptessure Vessel and PipinS DesiSn-Colkcted
r : radius of cylinder Papers 197-1959, New York, 1960.
4 : inside radius
Baker, E. H., L. Kovalevsky, F. L. Rich, Stn ctarulAnalysis ofShells, Mccraw-Hill, New York,
1912.
ro = outside radius Flugge, W., Stesses in Shells, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1960.
Gibron, J. E., Linear Elasrtc Theory oJ Thin SherrJ, Pergamon hess, New York, 1965.
, = thickness of cylinder Hefey,I. F -, Theory and Design of Moder PresJrt? y?JtetJ, Van Nostrand-Reinhold, Princ€ton,
T = temperature N.J., 1974.
Timosheoko, S., S. woitrowskey-Krieger, frreory of Plates 4r1d Shelrs, Mccraw-Hitl, New York,
AT = iemperature change 1959.
p = deflection
c = coefficient of thermal expansion
Ot = longitudinal stess
or = radial shess
Oe : hoop sftess
REFERENCES
Con|co|hrodconsistingof|woeccgn|liccones.(co',rtesyoftheNool€rcorPorgtion,sr.LoUi!,Mlo.)
t4l
r40
142 ANAI.YSIS OT TORMTD HEADS ANO TRANSITION SICTIONS 6.I HEMISPHERICATHIADS t43
P: pressure
Hence, expressions 6.2 and 6.3 become
r= radius
This equation which assumes uniform stress distribution through the thick-
Figure 6.2 shows an inflnitesimal segment of a spherical head Summation of
ness, is adequate for relatively thin heads. As the thickness increases with
respect to the radius, this assumption becomes invalid. Hence, a more accurate forces in the radial direction gives
formulation is needed, which is obtained from the "thick head" equations.
From symmetry, it can be demonstrated that at any point in a hemihead ,",= -l(fi)<,'"t (6.s)
subjected to uniform pressure,
ld\l' , 'r :
From Eqs. 3.1, rl; ll+ +(rro,) |
\dr / Lr- qr I
0
I.
e, = E\ot - zlto,) (t6.2)
Its solution is expressed as
i12
(6.6)
5r-
The boundary conditions are given by
o,= -n al r: ri
and
a,: -n at r:ro
Solving the boundary conditions forA and B and substituting into Eqs. 6.5 and
FisiJr€ 6.1 6.6, we obtain
l.l{ Al'lAtYlll Ol lOR illD H!AD3 AND TnANSl?lON SICTIONS 6.I HIMISPHERICATI{TAD3
[6.-dor
'
\
\ ' d. /
Figure 6.2
Jo/f
I
fisurs 6,3
",:f+('-*)-*('-*
rl\ / (6.7a\ A comparison between Eqs. 6.1 and 6.7 is shown in Fig. 6.3.
06: r?P'
oo= -:ll
/ r3P 't\
+:+l
r; - ri \
+
-lzr'/ - -;l=lt
r; - /i \ 2r./ Example 6.1. A hemispherical head with r = 15.0 in is subjected to an
internal pressure of 4000 psi. If the allowable stress is 23,000 psi, find the
Equation 6.7a can be simplified for the following cases: required thickness from Eqs. 6.1 and 6.7.
f :re SrN0
cls:f1 d0
dr - ds .Cos P
2(15t(4000) + 2(23.000X l5 )3
2(23,000) - 4000
= 16.31
t : 1.31 in. I
When referring to Fig. 6.4a, the middle surface of a shell is taken as a surface N@+tl do
of revolution. This is generated by the rotation of a plane curve about an axis
in its plane. This generating curve is called a meridian. An arbitrary point on the
Noo + de
middle surface of the shell is specified by the particular meridian on which it is *F
found and by giving the value of a second coordinate that varies along the
meridian and is constant on a circle around the shell's axis. Because these circles ++ do
are parallel to one another, they are called the "paralled circles."
The definition of r, n, 12, and @ are shown in Fig. 6 4a. The radius 11 is Figure 6.4
r= 12 sin $
For the majority of pressure vessel applications, the loads are symmetric with
ds = r, d.6
respect to the axis of revolution. Hence, all derivatives with respect to 0 in
expression 6.8 and 6.9 can be deleted. Shearing stresses due to torsion are small
lrigruc (r.4/r is a free-body diagram of a section of a surface of revolution. comDared with other stresses. Thus expression 6.9 can be deleted completely'
Srrrrrrrrirrg lirrces parallel to the tangent at the meridian and simplifying by
Tire last equation of equilibrium is obtained by summing the forces in Fig'
th.lctirg lt:rrns of higher order, we obtain 6.4b perpendicular to the middle surface:
I fr 1
Ar' = -:=srn @
No: 12. sln- I r, r2(P, cos {-
-,,, @, ILJ Pasin Q)s\nQdQ + Cl (6.11) Dcos A
I
The right-hand side of Eq. 6.11 is equal to the sum of all the N6 forces around and the strain is expressed as
a circle of angle d. Therefore we can solve Nd at any given location { by
summing all forces in the {-direction. Once N6 is obtained, Nd can be deter- ,r=!1ucos@-wsin@) (6.14)
mined from expression 6. 10.
For a spherical shell, 11 = 12 = r. Hence, expressions 6.10 and 6.11 can be
simplified as follows: Substituting ro = 12 sin { and Eqs. 3.3 into expressions 6.13 and 6.14 gives
N5 I N6= P,r
(6 12)
No : " .l t.ltP, cos @ - P6 sin @) sln $ d$ + C I
I (6.15)
^,-,
sln - @ LJ I . h.__
lt:ucotO- EtlNe f"Na)
The displacement for various loading conditions is derived from Fig . 6 .5 . The
total change in length AB is
Equations 6.15 can be solved for the deflections once N, and Nc are estab-
lished from Eqs. 6. 12. Table 6.1 shows the solution of Eqs. 6. 12 and 6. 15 for
u:4ra6
aQ
- w d6t various loading conditions.
The strain is therefore Example 6.2. Determine the forces in a spherical shell due to snow load.
1/do
ea=-l-;--l w\
(6.13)
\ \aQ rr./ Solutian. From Fig. 6.6,
P, -- -P" cos2 Q
P:P,cosdsind
From Eq. 6.12
rl
N^' =+-l
sln- q)LJ
f(-p, "os' S - P" sin2@ cos @) sin A dQ + Cl
I
-p"rf r I
)(- =,.'i' ;l l(cos' d + sin'z d) sin 6 cos 0 dO + C
qlJ
sm-
I
I
-a
lt. ",1 ^l
:rtt}Lts'n-@l+c.l
-P",
.- :
/vr -P.r- 4rC
2 sin 0
i-
d0
- -
As 4 approaches zero, the second expression of Nd approaches infinity unless
Fisurs 6.5 C is set to zero.
!l !l
a oo-l dl I
;.t'
e r-;-1
o -l
'1
o. !l
-l+
'.t .
*il .lN
+
!'6
!l
!te
.tr rl
o
.t f---l
q. r^r
c
le
o .f;|* <f ! ,9,/
o + --,{
..l+
o -
+ + +k!
o! -i, |= | -lc
o + +
I \j/
{t
.trrr
I NI
I
o
o @e
-o
l5l
r50
6.1 HtMllpHlRlcAt l'llAol ltl
152 ANAI.YSI! OI TO|.MTD H!ADs AND TRANSITION SICTIONS
complicated numb€r
the comDatibility equations are taken into consideration, a
Oifierential equations result' The solution of these equations is
"i.i*oii-*ut
imoracticat. however, withouisome simplifications. By assuming
symmetric P.
forces only, the differential equations for a spherical shell reduce to
and
rt)=Eto (6.17)
#**Affi-o<""eQ-
Figor€ 6.6
Thus, for C = 0
-P.;
L)
Yr= -P.r(cos2 Q -
= -4cosz|
6, L2 DiscontinuitY AnolYsis
'l'hc rnctnbrane analysis discussed in the previous section fails to Sive adequate
is attached
rcrult$ whon the loais are localized or when the hemispherical section
to lnothcr shell that acts differently under certain loads' In these cases the
In Figure 6'7 it is seen that
hcnding moments must be considered in the analysis' 8 EIIDI NG FORCES
lix u givcn krading condition, the membrane and the bending moments can be
Fig'.rre 6.7
con$id;rcd us shoin. Proceeding as before where both the free-body forces and
lla Af{Al,Ygl ot fotMrD HIADI AND TRANIITION SlCrlONS 6.t HEITATSPHERICAI HIADI ll!
whcrc 0 is thc anglc of rotation and is given by 0 = slope
| /d'zo\
^ a ldw (6.18) EVG)
r raQ
w : radial deflection
By a rigorous analysis Gibsont has shown that in Eqs. 6' 16 and 6.17 only the
higher-order terms are significant in most usual pressure vessel applications. I r ..,
F;lt\ e - luYA)
Accordingly, the equations reduce to
The solution of Eq. 6.23 for various common loading conditions is given in
d2 o _ -Qrz Table 6.2.
(6.1e)
do' D
Example 6.3, Calculate the head discontinuity forces of the head-to-shell
junction shown in Fig. 6.8a. Let p : 3gg psi and /, = 0.3.
(e:
dE'
(6.20)
Solutian. From Fig. 6.8b and Table 6.1 the
pressure rs
deflection in the head due to
",,
P12
Eliminating 0 from Eqs. 6.19 and 6.20 gives 6o : - ,r) sin
=(l
(300x50)'?rl
(6.2r) _ _o?l
ffi++*o=o E(0.50) '-
where _ 1,050,000
E
/ ,\2
,\a=3(l-r1l;/ (6.22) Tqble 6.2 Approximote Force qnd Deflection funcfions for Sphericol Segments
,//-r-\ I
Nr- -Qcot0
y6-"- r'r" i n1r1*nll
= --9
lr L-rYsi n0osi n (ry ) Ho lto
N"-do ry
tT(f""-rt"t
6 to no" [zr"t no"o"rv ,ao lzre- I-,6- rs tiocos{ ry+r/a)
-+ucos0sinrYl,l
M^:2(+\
- r \dQ/
-rF*""o"""t rv*r+l]J
rnro"i n (r.r+r/a)l ro
1; t-z'F^2u-tt"
/-1r,3
rT \-- "-rt.o"rr\/
Mo = pMo (6.23)
It6 AltlAtYlll Of iotlillo HIAD! At'lD ltAilllTloN slcTloN3 6.r HlMrsPHtRtcat HtADs lt7
6,"=s#6
,rr: -3#ro
Similarly, the deflection in the shell due to pressure is obtained from Eq. I of
Examnle 5.5 as
,='#(' _;,tt\
:ffi,,-0.,r,
_ 637,500
E
B=
= 0.1818
E/ | n\3
D=-ij:j_=0.0916E
ra\t - u.J-)
u,":,--#4r"
Figirr€ 6.8
eo" = aEEm
8nd
6rr=yM,
- O.3)(lqoJ
0,"=gfMo
12.038
total deflection of head = total deflection of shell
From Table 6.2,
q#
6,:Wl^
r.r+4pq *
Tr" Y*" * = _
ryH" * Yr,
OT
)A2 pr T=1200-2Or
N.: 2tH" +':::-M^ +
-2
: z(r2.o3s)(-146." * ?g?qg@-' !9P The first integral in Eq. 24b gives
and The second integral is zero because the limits of integration at the inner surface
are both ri. Hence Eq. 6.24b gives
y^=A=7500 lb/in.
(30 x 106)(7 x l0 6)
Mo : 179.4 lb-in'lin. (1 - 0.3X30t
[2(3ot + (30t.. ^-^ ^^^.- (3ofll2oo - ^^ .l
2o(rnj
and
tffi ro'o5o'ooo)
'l'hc dcrivation of thermal stress in a spherical segment due to radial distribution The buckling equations developed by Von Karman and Tsien2 are the basis of
ol ternpcrature can be derived similarly to cylindrical shells (see Section 5.4.3). the design equations developed by ASME. Von Karman's equations, which are
Thc meridional and circumferential stresses in a sphere are the same due to substantiated by tests, give a more accurate prediction of buckling strength of
160 ANAI.YSIS OT FORMTD HTADS ANO TRANSITION SICTIONS 6.I HTMISPHERICAI.HEADS t6l
u,:
' Er'(!\o f fYJ^- r)'sin d/d (6.2s)
\r/ Jo \cos a /
Similarly, the strain energy due to bending is expressed as
-rB
o:alr-c,1"-4)l
L \ p'/l
(6.30)
U1: Prit I P sin'?dcan 0 - tan O) cos Q dg (6.27)
JO
where 0 is the slope and is related to the deflection by
The total energy of the system is the sum of Eqs. 6.25, 6.26, and 6.27 . Hence
a: , fu @ - o) dO (6.31)
U=Ut+U2+Ur (6.28)
JO
'l'hc solution of Eq. 6.29 is obtained by the Raleigh-Ritz method by finding an where
cxprcssion of the deflection that satisfies the boundary condition
Pr
o:'
0:0 at 4:0
s:B at Q=B and D is obtained from Eq. 6.32.
I62 ANAI,YSIS Of fORMTD HEADS AND TRANSITION SICTIONS 6.2 ETTIPSOIDAL HTADS r63
A plot ol l!. 6..|.1 is shown in lrig. 6. l(). 'l'hc nrinirnum value ol ljq. 6.33 dil'lerentiation results in an expression whose minimum value is
crn bc lirund by taking thc derivittivc with respect to B and equating the result
(o zero:
or 4/D\l + (3/280)t6/r),
fi = o.rtt
(6.34)
Et 5\r/l + t24/3st(6/tP Experimental values have shown that the minimum value obtained is of the order
of
which is shown as a dashed line in Fig. 6.10. This figure illushates the effect
of 6/t on the buckling shength of spherical sections. The minimum value of
buckling strength is obtained from the figure as
ff: o.tzs (6.35)
o.3
I (\ The governing equations for the design of ellipsoidal and torispherical heads are
obtained from expressions 6. l0 and 6. I l. For internal pressure, P. :
P, P6 O, :
and the two equations give4
o.2
El tve op,i
o.1 ,ro: 2
.o (6.36)
64.rc 14 18 Ne: +Prz=j;-
%
Fisure 6.10 We can write Eqs. 6.36 in terms of the major and minor radii a and b. Using
l6tl ANAl,Ytlt Ol lOt,UlD HtADt AND TRANSII|ON SICTIONS 6.2 rruPsotDAt HEADS
where
At any given point on the ellipse given by.re and y6, the angle { can be obtained
Irom
D^2
6.3 TORISPHERICALHEADS
B=
Equation 6.38 is similar to Eq. 5.21 for cylindrical shells except that in Eq.
6.38 the quantity p is a function of 12 that is variable along the meridian. This
requires numerical integration of all moment, force, deflection, and slope ex-
pressions at angles less than @ : 9g'.
If a discontinuity force is applied at the edge as shown in Fig. 6. 13, Eq. 6.3g
yields the following values.3
.:#rru,n,-FoB^Md.
u, :
7, -: z1,f;c FoBp,Mo)
^oo
n = Gr"^n, + zBoDe,Mi
(6 3e)
h/.
Fis'rr€ 6.12
*r=ffi<-oupo+ Ap"Mo)
Similarly,
Me = t&10
No=+(2br-ar)
zo-
/lno.|r4Rl
= -ffitz x 24, _ 482)
: -4800 lb/in.
and
- 4Rfn
o' = -(rf = -9600 psi I Fisuro 6.13
I6E ANATYIIT OI IORMTD HTADS AND TRANSITION STCTIONS
6.4 CON|CAT HEADS t69
whcrc AA = ., rr'(cos ps + sin Bs) The forces and deflections obtained from Eq. 6.40 due to some typical loading
Be, = e &(cos Bs - sin Bs) conditions are shown in Table 6.3.
Cs = s-8" t.,t P Exampfe 6.7. A conical shell with d : 45" and base diamerer of g ft is
Dp" = a-Fs rin B" subjected to an intemal pressure P Find the expressions for N6 and N".
.Rt - u\ Solutinn. For intemal : = p. Therefore, from
rh= \l--a- 6.40,
pressure, N" 0 and lr'e Eq.
p= poisson's ratio
:
Ne Ps tan 6r
The sfress distribution in a conical head can be obtained from Eqs. 6. l0 and p-
6.11. From Fig. 6.14 with d constant, (1)
cos a
r=ssind Also
/t=o
P .2
12= stard N"=;*d,;+c
Redefining N4 as N, and p4 as p", Eq. 6.10 becomes
at
Na : p,s tan d
s=0 N"=0
and Eq. 6.l1 becomes
Hence
rv" = + I ,0,- o,tan d)r dr (6.40)
c= 0
Ps tan a'
and
Pr
lV":;-:
zcosa , I
PR
Fisure 6.1,{ 2 cos c!
6.4 CONICAT HEADS t7l
od
I
d -o
\nP
d o (J NI
I at4
. 6t .t. Etr
Ao AIFr
, olsr
AI
^
:+!
r--:---r
ilN
t !
d.
'I
o R
itl
lo
o E - Ol
v; -l t 3
l6
o old
I IE N I
- - ;lo ;l .l olp
o ol olN olq
a, 'l'
o t *" ""1-
o
lt a drN
f'
o
o
-3 (b)
o
| -o
"i r:J
Figure 6.15
o I ld d -
p I (/lla o - ot-o
N | .1.^ u ltld
-o d old alN o olN Sumrnation of vertical forces at point 0 gives
(JI I E OIF
c tF Qti
a . lo) ilo N le Ull
of | 6 | . , tP 2zrRV = PnR2
(i ^" | ? ".li or
rlt
Fo
z@@
o
F
V =PR
2
..
,= PR t^n d
2
170
172 ANALYSI3 O' TORM!O HIAOS AND TRANSITION SCCTIONS
This tbrce H must bc resisted by ring action at the junction The required area
of the ring is given by
-
.HR
(f
o==
= =
ts I
NI
*'l * e- N l@
tl.{
R = radius at base of cone
o' = one-half the apex angle i-:-r
o: allowable compressive stress of ring
Example 6.8. What is the required area of the compression ring at the cone-
to-cylinder junction in Example 6.7? Let P : 20 psi and the allowable stress in
the ring 10,000 psi.
I .\r
Solution. From Eq. 6.41, F^
x Fl+ l-->
20x48'?x1.00 +
2 x 10,000
= 2.3O in2 . I o
o
.ol
6.4.2 Discontinuity AnolYsis t
o
@l
.l t
0, qI
I NIS'
tN
--> !l IN
N| -_>
The derivation of the discontinuity expressions for conical shells is similar to that
for cylinders. The resulting moment and force equations for conical shells are
expressed in the more complicated Bessel function terms. However, approxi-
mate solutions for various edge loading conditions can be expressed in simple
form as shown in Table 6.4. In this table, cg
6: =
.o *.
=11
^t
IJ='-,
' srn 4)
173
6.4 CONICAT HEAD5 t/5
t74 ANAIYSIS Of fORMEO HEADS AND TRANSITION STCTIONS
I exprcssrons:
f:Hu
F:H(1 -U)
/r\
M: HIiIVZ
\p/
where
Pr lan d'
Figure 6.16 H: 2
(1)
f+F:H
The maximum longitudinal stress due to M and pressure is expressed
as
to external hydrostatic
The solution of the buckling of a conical section subjected
The resultant equation is very
Sirrrilutly, oressure is normally obtained by energy methods s Experimental
ffi;;#ili; the iterativi prociis needed for lhe solution
shells has
and/ ,"."-"ft the buckling equations of conical and cylindrrcal
r()trti()n ol cylinder at junction due to M of cylindrical
.iro*oiftut"o-paring
tfti, U*lling of a conicai shell is similar to the buckling
of the cone and a radius equal to
F (3) r-n"fi.-*ift length eq-ual to the slant length
= rotation of cone at junction due to M and "
,h" un"aog" radiris of curvature of the cone Research has also shown that the
influence on the buckling of a cone'
qr""tiiy O - Dr/Dr) has a significant
llsirrl f rrlrlcs 5.2and6.4 and solving Eqs 1,2, and3 result in the following
176 ANAI.YSIS OF fORMtD HTADS AND TRANSITION SICTIONS
6,4 CONTCAT HEADS 177
2.42E (t /2r)25 The second bracketed expression can be approximated by the quantity
p
=6_EfnlL/r,-o.4sen84 (6.42)
For most applications, the second quantity in the bracketed denominator is small
r+ND,
compared with the first one and can thus be neglected' Based on this, the
buckling equation of a cone (Fig. 6.17). may be wrinen as Using a factor of safety (FS), the allowable external pressure on a cone is given
by
P, 2.6(t"/D2)25 (6.43)
E- (FS)(Le/Dz)
Example 6.10, Design the cone shown in Fig. 6.18 for an extemal pressure
of 15 osi. Let FS = 4.0 and E = 30 x 166 psi.
,. : T (' * noq)
= 24 3't5 in.
Fisure 6.17
I70 ANATYSIS OT FORMED HEAOS ANO TRANSITION SICTIONS NOMENCI.ATURE 179
NOMENCTATURE
s = distance along the slanted length of cone, measured from apex
? = temperature
for cones
7 =7r/2-Q
6 = deflection measured perpendicular to axis of symmetry
A : rotation
^p =\yto=-6i/F
= poisson's ratio
o = stress
o- = critical buckling stress
o, : radial stress
.r, = longitudinal stess in cone
od = hoop stress
od : meridional sfess
R,EFERENCES
t. Gibson, L E., Linear Elastic Theory of Thin SherrJ, Pergamon Press, New York, 1965.
von Kaman, T. and Hsue-Shen Tsien, "The Buckling of Spherical Shells by Extemal
P.essue" in Ptessure Vessel and Piping Detign: Collected Papers 197-1959, Afieican
Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1960.
Coates. W. M., '"The Stale of Shess in Full Heads of Pressure Vessels" in PressureVessel anl
Piping Design: Collected Papers 1927-1959, American Society of Mechanical Engineers,
New York. 1960
Baker, E. H. et al., Srell Arnlysis Manual, NASA CR-912, National Aelonautics and Space
Adminisb"ation. Washingto!, D.C., 1968.
Jawad, M. H., "Design of Conical Shells Under Extemal Loads," Jounal of Pressure Vessel
Technology, Vol. lO2, 1979.
R^etz, R. Y., An Experimental Investigarton of the Strength of Small-Scale Conical Reducer
Sections Between Cylindrical Shells under Extenal Hydrostatic Pressure, V. S. Department of
the Navy, David Taylor Model Basin, Report 1187, February 1959.
I
CHAPTE R7
STRESS IN FLAT PLATES
t83
l8.l 3TR!SS lN fLAT ptATrS
7.2 CIRCUI.AR PI.ATES t85
7.1 INTRODUCTION
lli:4gl
such .ucas
ru\,rr
* very common in grgcesl .quiq-"nt.Qiqrgql
as rozztc
areas .ts nozzle covers, bulk
DulK neads, ani tubesheets,
heads, and tuUesilOets, Ttrereas rcefanCular
-whereas
glles.are used as segnrylq! trays, baffles, and in rectangulir'p."rGffi;i;.
This chapter presenB-6rieTdescription of the theoretical iackground of
circular
and rggjqggkUllates.
The theory of symmetric bending of laterally loaded plates is generally
based
on the following assumptions:
These assumptions form the basis for developing the bending theory downward deflections are positive, the relationship becomes
of plates
and apply to plales where buckiing is not a consideration.
6 1dw
(7.2)
fr f rdr
7.2 CIRCULAR PLATES
The moment-curvature relationship is based on Eq. 3.11 and is given by
The relationship between the radius of curvature and the deflection
of a circular
plate is obtained from Eq. 3.6 as
1 1\
- -r p-l
1 d,2w
;= 77 Substituting Eqs. 7.1 and 7.2 into this expression gives
For a unilorrnly bodcd platc, thc tbrces acting on an clement are shown in Substituting Eqs. 7.3 and 7.4 into 7.6 gives
Fig. 1.2u. Taking moments uboul a-n gives
d1w I d2w_--=:
1dw O
(Mr1!!r l,lii,rr1= -g
Equations 7 .7 and 7 -t are the basis differential equations for the bending of
circular plates due to symmetric loading. Equation 7.7 can also be written in
term of the local load as
I d [,d l! d (,a\.ll c
r drl drlr dr\ dr/l) = (7.e)
D
Once w is determined from Eqs. 7.7, then the moments are obtained from Eqs.
7 .3 arrd 7.4. The shearing force is determined from Eq. 7.6, and is exDressed
as
o: D(+.!+ - \+\
\ dr- r ar- r'ar/
(7.10)
Example 7.1. Derive the moment expression for a uniformly loaded, simply
supported circular plate of radius a. For g, :
0.3, plot the moment diagram and
determine the maximum deflection. rotation. and stress values.
Solution. From Fig. 7 .3, the sheat Q at any radius r is givenby 2mQ : nnz P
or
Pr
(b)
tiswe 7.2
188 STRlSl lN rtAT PLATIS 7,2 CIRCUI.AR PI.ATES t89
Pra r2 13 + p\t_!_t
Pa2 Paa /6 + Zu \
r4':_
sD 4\l+prl8D 64D\t+p_ll 'l
or
o :, * '\
w: -)-(az '15+u
Fisure 7.3
UD'- - ,tll'; \l+p
.a2 - r2l
I
(3)
and
Therefore, from Eq. 7.7,
Et3
d,\' d,)
andwithp=0.30
A second integration gives the expression for the slope that is given by
o'696!aq
^ dw Pr3 Crr
-drl6D2r
Cz
(1)
,-
"'-"" Et3
^ = -Pat : -3^,
d'- (l - rr)
Pr4 C,rz 8r,(r + p) tP"'
w:_L+++C2lnr+,C,
64D4- -i
and with /.r = 0.30
At the center of the plate, r = 0 and the slope is zero due to symmetry. Hence,
liom liq. l, f,2: Q. s^^= -t.os
At r : a, moment M, = 0 and Eg. 7.3 gives EtY
Paz /3 u\+ The moment expression is obtained by substituting Eq. 3 into Eqs. 7.3 and
Cr: -8D\l+,,/ 7 .4. Hence
At r a, thc deflection is zero and Eq. 2 gives ,,=*rt + 1t)(a2 - 12) (s)
,,=#(T#-') u, =
ftbt{z + p.) - r2(1 + 3p.)l (6)
r90 tliltt rN trAT PtATtt 7.2 CIRCUTAR PTATIS t9l
and
I'
llt tt + tLt -
h
u, = 121t + 3p)) (s)
Figoro 7.4 Momeni diltriburion for simply suppord plolo.
tt2 $iltt tlit llaT ptATtt 7.3 RTCTANOUTAR PrAlt3 t9g
^
Answeri mo( lr = #
azMn
at center
zD\t + l.L)
max 0^ =
aM"
at edge
-_ft 'f
u\r p)
max M, = Mo throughout plate
m^x M, = Mo throughout plate
7.3 Determine the maximum moment in the circular plate shown in Fig. 7.6
: :
if a = 4 ir., b = 2 in., p 0.3, and P 100 psi.
A plot of Eqs. 4 and 5 for p = 0.3 is shown in Fig. 7.5. The plot indicates tlnt
the maximum moment occurs at the edge and is given by
M,*"= -Paz
Fieur. 7.6
and
q(x,yt+#.#=, (7 .1,r)
Substituting Eqs. 7 .13 andT .15 into7.1l and using M"t = -MofromEq.3.1l
gives
Summing mornents around the "r-axis and deleting all quantities of higher order
gives
, d,M, 2d2M*+
y,-r -;z a2M,
q\x, - -;i ir, = u (7.16)
^: o
u*' !-'Y^
= (7.18c)
Figwe 7.7 dxdy
Itc filttt tt{ il.tT tta?tl 7.4 CIRCUIAR PIATIS ON IIASTIC IOUNDATION I97
and tho shcarfng forccs Q, and p, arc determined from Eqs .7 ,12,7 .14, and3.ll comparison of the denominator in parentheses in the expressions for M, and M,
a8 indicates that M) will always give a larger value of M for the given values of a
and b. Accordingly, the maximum value ofM is given by
"t = 0.577216
The limits of the Z functions as 'r --> 0 and as x :+ co are given in Table 7' 1' The force exerted by an elastic foundation on a ciruclar plate due to deflection
The table also shows the limits for the first derivatives of Zt tltroryh Zq. of the foundation is expressed as
The relations between the various derivatives of the Z functions are as fol-
lows: P=Kow
where p = foundation load
Toble 7.1 Limits of Zfunctions
w = deflection of foundation
Limit as Limit as
.r ---+ 0
Ko = stiffness of foundation
Function
: modulus of elasticity of foundatior/depth of foundation.
Z{x) 1.0 f cos K
_x2 The differential equation of a circular plate on an elastic foundation can be
z2@) --7- -f sin K
obtained by modifying Eq. 7 .7 as
E+(x) 2
Ct - Qa : constants of integration
dx nx 1fu(cosg+sin0 Example 7.4. Detemfne the maximum deflection in a circular plate on an
I.1x
elastic foundation subjected to a concentrated load F in the center of the plate.
=:eXD""'=
' !2tx - !2 Solution. From Table 7.1 it is seen that as r approaches infinity, Z and Zz also
xn j-
'v26 +i
,t, =
approach infinity. Therefore, Ct and C2 must be set to zero. Thus
v86
w:CtZt(ar)iCaZa(ar\
100 tTmll rt{ tuT ptaTtt UEUOORAPHY 201
Substituting these derivatives into Eq. 7.10 and equating this to F' gives a = */EJD
poisson's ratio
^F
4azD REFERENCE
and l. Tiomoohenko, S., and S. Woircwsky-l<liege\ Theory of phtes and Shelts, McGmw-Hill,
New Yort, 1959.
'= BIBTIOGRAPHY
and
'fi6t'<*>
Hetenyr,M., Beams on Etastic Foandation, University of Michigan Pr€ss. Atrn Arbor, Michigan,
1964.
F McFarland, D, E., Smith, B, L,, aDd Bernhan, W. D., Analyris of plates, Spaftan Books, New
8rr2D York, 1972.
Szilard, R., Theory and Awlysis of Prorer, hedice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, {.J., 1974.
NOMENCI-ATURE
Et3
;:;:----------;:
tz\t - p-)'
E = modulus of elasticity
Kq = stiffness of foundation
= modulus of elasticity of foundation/depth of foundation
M, = radial moment in circular plates
PART3
DESIGN OF
COMPONENTS
203
X CHAPTER 8
DESIGN OF
CYLINDRICAL SHELLS
St tot,,is' Mo
a,' ,'l,rrrr-n rower used by o ferlilizer monufocturer' (Courtesv of lhe Nooter CorPorolion'
)
205
2tJ4
206 DlgloN or cyuNDRrcAr. sHEr.rs 8.I ASMI DESIGN EOUATIONS 207
Cylindricul vcsscls ure very liequently used in the petrochemical industry. They As the pressure increases above 0.4 S, Division 2 uses plastic analysis (see
a.re easy to fabricate and install and economical to maintain. The required Section 15.l) to obtain
thickness is generally controlled by intemal pressure, although in some instances
applied loads and extemal pressure have control. Other factors such as thermal
stress and discontinuity forces may also influence the required thickness. r /R+r\
=ftn \Ri (8.3)
Example 8.1. A pressure vessel with an inside diameter of 50.0 in. is subjec-
8.I ASME DESIGN EQUATIONS ted to an intemal pressure of 100 psi. Using an allowable stress of 17,500 psi,
find the required thickness according to Section VIII, Division 1. Assume that
A simplified equation was developed by the ASME Code, Vltr-l, for deter- all circumferential and longitudinal seams are double-welded butt joints and are
mining the required thickness of a cylinder subjected to intemal pressure. It is spot radiographed.
a simplification of Eq. 5.3 and gives accurate results over a wide range of r2/r1.
This equation is expressed as Solution. From Appendix J a value of, = 0.85 is obtained. From Eq. 8.1,
PR
100 x 25
sE - 0.6P
(8.1)
-t=-=SE PR0.6p
- 17,500x.85-0.6x100
where t: required thickness r = 0.17 in. I
P = inlemal pressure
Exarnple8.2. A seamless cylindrical shell with an outside diameter of 30.0 in.
R = inside radius is butt-welded to seamless ellipsoidal heads. The circumferential seams are not
x-rayed. Find the required shell thickness ifthe allowable stress is 15,000 psi and
S = allowable stress the intemal design pressure is 250 psi. Use Section XIII, Division 1 rules.
E : joint efficiency factor
A comparison of Eqs. 8.1 and 5.9 is shown in Fig. 5.6. It indicates the wide Solutinn. From Appendix J, with a value ofE = 1.0 (seamless shell), allow-
able circumferential stress must be reduced to 8070 since the circumferential
range of applicability of Eq. 8.1. The ASME Code, Vltr-l, has, however,
seams are not x-rayed.
limited the use of Eq. 8.1 to t less than or equal toR/2 and pressure less or equal
to 0.0385 S. Various forms of Eq. 8.1 are shown in Appendix I together with
From Appendix I, the required thickness equation in terms of outside radius
is given by
an altemate equation that expresses the thickness in terms of Re rather than R.
The factor E in Eq. 8.1 is an efficiency factor and its magnitude depends on
the extent of radio$aphy performed at the various seams of the cylinder. Appen-
PR
dix J illushates the effect of radiography of various seams on the values of E as SE + O.4P
established by the ASME Code, VI[-l.
In Section VIII, Division 2, of the ASME Code, the equation for required
thickness is based on the stress at an average radius. Hence,
250 x 15
^ P(R + t/2) (15,000 x 0.80)(1.0) + (0.4 x 250)
t = 0.31 in. t
Probhms
PR
(8.2)
8.1 An ASME pressure vessel with an inside diameler of4 ft has a seamless
s - 0.5P shell. The head{o-shell seams are partially radiographed. Find the re-
206 DtStON Of CYt"tNORrCAt" SHE|TS
8.2 TVATUATION OF DISCONTINUITY STRISSIS
quircd thickness il'thc alkrwablc stress is 20,()00 psi and the design prcs-
sure i$ 2900 psi. STRESS
CATEGORIES
Answer: t: 3.81 in.
8.2 What is the maximum allowable pressure that can be applied to a cylinder PR II4ARY SECON DARY
shell with an outside diameter of 6 ft, thickness 1.25 in., and an allowable
stress of 17,500 psi? Let E : 0.85.
general prima rY membaane nn e*'ampte of a local PririarY betqeen a nozzle and the in a vessel v/al l.
stress is one which is so membrane sttess is the menbrane shell to t,Jhich it is attached. 2) the difference betl/leen th
distributed ln the structure stress in a Shell Produced bY 3) the equivalent linear stress actual stress and the
that no fe-distributlon of external loadr dnd monent at a produced by the radial tenperature equlvalent I i near stress.
'load occurs as a result of perFanent suppoft or at a distribution in a cylindrical shell 3) the thermal stress in a
yielding, An exaniPle is the noz2le connection. cladding material.
stress in a circular cYlinder Figure 8.,{ Ihermdl Stress Cot€gori6 (Courr$y of lhe Aftericon Socierv of Mechdnicol Ensineers )
!o Pnhe.y or eR0n6.
tt
-I--,--.---t----*-1--1
tP. F{ s.) I I i
|i i
:
a
T\-/
I
|| || r-.+
| - - -;i I
.- -r- /-\ ri !
:
lP(-PD H1,5 s-) L__---*f ----.t
\--'l I
a U* &5iEn load3
---- Us op.aungloads
- .
lPr +P. +Q +F , s. )
H
\-/
-
Fisure 8.5
213
212
2ta Dltloltl Of CYtlNoRlCAt 3H!rr3 8.2 EVATUATION OF DISCONTINUIW STRESSES 215
rh = 60 + =
+! 60.5157 in.
B=
Fisur.8.6
,,1
3(1 - p')
h/
= 9.8465
o, = ,^'.!o'1
tz\t - p-),, =
o.so35E
=._"a
n, oe
Figur€ 8.2
Hence, the maximum shess = 15,300 psi, which is about 27o above the allow-
able sffess of 15,000 psi.
-
Point C . The discontinuity forces at point c are shown in Fig . g .g . From this
ngure, Fisure 8.8
216 Dt]Ot{ of cful{DflcAt 3H!U.3
8.2 EVATUATION OF DISCONTINUIW 5TRE55IS 217
Thc lirst cornputibility cquution is given by
^
aw"=
N,e 83,991
defl€ction of shell = deflection of head D,= h
^ r0.86M,
or ar, = En
. 4-
''': -
zp"D,
4r3'4s69Q
Eo M"+ 1'.9521Q= -7733.99 (4)
or
2. I-acal membrane plus secondary stress (pr + O) In the plastic region, ASME uses quasi-stresFstrain curves similar to those in
Fig. 8.11 to determine plastic buckling. These curves are plotted on log-log
a6 = 35,000 + 220 = 35,220 psi graphs with a factor of safety of two for stress. Because the stress-strain curves
+ 720 differ for different temperatures, a number of curves for different temperatures
ot = 7500 = 8220 psi
are plotted in Fig. 8.11. Hence, allowable stress is given by
o;: -500+0 : -500 psi
A comparison of Figs . 5 . 1 7 and 5 . I 8 indicates that the buckling due to pressure If allowable pressure is needed, then
applied to sides and ends is more critical than the pressure applied to the ends
only. Accordingly, the ASME code, VIII, uses Eq. 5.17 as the basis for design. ^ zto
-D.
4tB
This equation is modified to take into consideration nonelastic bucklins and FS (D,)
g
I I I 8lolgv:l
I
i
$ 33933 BssFF e ?3s 3
tl
-6
-8 -6 -6
:l V g;
11 -'t
a.>
!"" 5-
jE
I .."
E.n
\ \ JR
E
\ \ 5:.
E c- fq
fiA
tt5
5c;
.:.'
E
-a9
€
'6
E.E
I
- s 5F
q 9 fl-
; f :('
+Tet
\ .:J I
'= bt
j6 E
i;+
;bE
da EE9
oE 39PP9
4 -Fo
5g :* RFR R
'd
g9
aE 8.
i; !a
220 221
olsloN oF cYt"rNDRrcAL sHEtrs 8.3 ASME PROCEDURI FOR EXTERNAI" PRESSURE DTSIGN 223
l.l
(E.lr )
\D./t)'
P : 4
@"/t)FS The ASME procedure for the design of cylindrical shells under extemal
pressure is complicated because of the various parameters that must be consid-
----!-
ASME uses a factor of safety of 3.0 for buckling of cylindrical shells subjected ered. A summary ofthe procedure is shown in Fig. 8. 12 as an aid to the designer.
to lateral and end extemal pressures. Hence, for elastic region (D./t > l0),
Example 8.4. The length of a cylindrical shell is 15 ft, outside diameter l0 ft,
2AEo and is constructed of carbon steel with minimum yield strength of 36,000 psi.
(8.6)
3(D,/t) The shell is subjected to an extemal pressure of 10 psi. Find (a) the required
thickness using ASME factor of safety and (b) the required thickness using a
and for elastic or plastic region (D./t ;- lO), factor of safety of 2.0.
ForD,/t values less than 10, ASME uses a variable factor of safety that ranges p_ (2x0.009_l-8..1!Z? x 106)
: psi o.K.
from 3.0 for values of D"/t = 10 to a factor of safety of 2.0 for values of r0.9
(3)(32u)
D"/t = 4-O. This reduction occurs because for very thick cylinders, buckling
ceases to be a consideration and the allowable values in tension and comoression A check is needed to ascertain that buckling is in the elastic rather than the plastic
are about the same . Hence, for D"f t< 10 the allowable value of P is tfie lower region. FromFig.8.ll with A = 0.0018, a value of B:2600 psi is obiained
of the quantities Pr and Pz given below. in the elastic region of the curve. Hence, the above solution ;f l0.g DSi is
For D./t < lO, adequate.
^
"= DJr\'- oJ,) t= 0.3125 in.
where o = two times the allowable stress in tension or 0.9 times the yield Then
stress of the material, whichever is less.
I
Note also that for values of D"/t < 4, the following equation can be used:
4=38a
t
8.3 ASME PROCEDURE FOR EXTERNAI PRESSURE DESION 223
Coloulot.! A ad u..
ur",:jin.
lo r
E rt,r- not.rlol. ofi.r.i, vtLh A
I. A lo r.lght off oa .c61. Ext rrd eD..oi |ot. Example 8.5. A cylindrical shell with length 18 ft and an outside diameler 6
? l.nE r€tir-. I lfl
tE lzchlol ls crd ft is constructed of carbon steel with a yield stress of 38,000 psi. Determine the
..cd B
t. A to l.it, otfroO .col. thickness needed to resist an external pressure of 300 psi.
?
p 2x0.00095x29x106
3 x 57.6 = 320 psi
I. 2Sl, < O.96U ?
P-4x12'oon
,: = 278 psi inadequare
3x57n
Try r: 1.375 in. Then
and A:o.oo11
I. Pol < Poa ?
!=sr.o
Figure 8.12 The ASME method for daerminins moximum ollowobte oxternot pr€ssure on cvtinders. From Fig. 8.11,
224
226 Dl3tON Of CYUNDR|CAL SHEttS
lJ = 12,400 psi
dx It
'=^:"
don
'P: 3 52.4 =
x 316 psi O.K.
8.3 The thickness of a l3-ft diameter reactor is 5.50 in. and its effective leneth
is l8 ft. Ifthe design temperature is 900'F, what is the maximum allowa6le
external pressure?
Answer: t = 7/16in.
A jacketed pressure vessel with an intemal diameter of 12 ft is subject€d I
to an interni pressure of 400 psi and a jacket pressure of 200 psi . The shell
thickness is controlled by the intemal pressure using an allowable tensile E
stress of 15,000 psi at 800T with an E factor of 1.0. Determine the i
-F
required stiffener spacing from Figs. 8.10 and 8.11. '6
I
.J
Answer: L = 16.2in. I
+ E
I
8.6 A distillation tower is subjec0ed to a vacuum of 15 psi. lf D" = 9 ft, -J
p
t = 0.75 in., and stiffener spacing = 8 ft, what is the maximum permis- I
sible lemperature? +-
l'
E
E
J
Answer: T : 900"F I i5 a,
+ ,r&
.og
; e;
+- AF
8.4 DESIGN OF STIFFENING RINGS I
In deriving Eq. 5.17 for the maximum strength of a cylindrical shell under
cxternal pressure, it was assumed that the ends of the shell were simply sup-
F)rted. For this to be true, stiffening rings, flanges, and so on (Fig. 8.13) are
nccded as lines of supports. These supports are assurned to carry all the load that
thc shell carries due !o external pressure. By refering to Figs. 8. 13 and 8.14,
Iotal force in stiffener is
227
DESTON Ot CYltNDRtCAt SHfl.tS 8,4 DESIGN TOR STIFFENING RINGS
,:4P
FS PP"
': 2 2(t + A,/L)
With a factor of safety (FS) of 3.0 expression 8.5 becomes
-3PD"
a:or,aatra (8.8)
The stiffening ring must also be checked against buckling. The classical expres-
s ti ffener sion for the buckling of a ring due to external pressure is
I 2116
U;
E l1ti I
- A
tf=-:
Di,G + A,/L)L
PD.L = 2F
Es D')"A + A'/L)L
The stress in the shaded area of Fie. 8.14 is This equation can be used in conjunction with Eq. 8.8 and Fig. 8.10. In doing
so, a hial A, is normally selected and I is calculated from Eq. 8.8. Using the
value ofB, which already incorporates a factor of safety of 3.0, a value ofA is
o- I'- PD.
obtained from Fig. 8.11. With this A, the required moment of inertia is calcu-
- L(t + A,/L)- 2(t + A,/L) laled from expression 8.9
Because the stability of the stiffening ring is essential in calculating the shell
In this equation it is assumed that the area A" of stiffening ring is ,,smeared', over
stability, a higher factor of safety is used by ASME in the stiffening ring
the total length z.
calculations as compared with shell calculations. With a factor of safety of 3.5,
Using the terminology of Fig. 8.11 and expression 8.5,
exoression 8.9 becomes
'FS
28 .
t:--
DZL(I + A"/L)A (8.10a)
A-
230 DIS|ON Ot CYUNDRTCAT SHEItS 8,5 ATIOWABI.E GAPS IN STITFENING RINGS 23I
The svuilable / obtuined liom Eq. tt. lOa must be lower than the available Hence,
tmoment of inertia of the stiffening ring. This inertia is calculated without
considering the contribution of the adjacent cylinder. If the composite 1of the
ring and the effective cylinder are considered, then a penalty of 28Zo is applied r=;t4J\--.,/4ooo\
,* l: l0.4psi
to Eq. 8.10 and a new expession given by
Use a shell thickness of3/16 in. and try a 3 x 3 x 3/16 angle stiffening ring.
,, _ DzLa + A"/L)
' - lo.9
(8. r0b)
A, = 1.09 in.2 and I = 0.9622 in.a
must be used. The actual f is calculated from the available rins and shell areas : r
R = : ----------l-
/t0x72)
as shown in Fig. 8.15. " 4 (u187 5 + l og/4a: z)/u PSr
Example 8,6. A long cylindrical shell is constructed of carbon steel with a From Fig. 8.11, A : 0.00018.
yield stress of 38,000 psi and a radius of 36 in. If the stiffeners are spaced at a
4-ft interval, calculate the required shell thickness and the size of stiffening rings , _722 x 48(0.18?5 + 1.09/48 x0.00018)
for an external pressure of l0 psi at 100"F. A
Solution. l*t : 0.67 in. a OK t
r : D--
= tt+
0.1857 in.
a = 0.67 t
8,5 AITOWABLE GAPS IN STIFIENING RINGS
From Fig. 8.10,
Gaps in stiffening rings are normally provided to allow for drainage of vessel
A= 0.00028 contents or permit piping and other internals to extend through the ring. Exam-
ples of various gap arrangements are shown in Fig. 8.16. The maximum allow-
From Fig. 8.11, able gap can be calculated by assuming the distance between points a and b of
Fig. 8. 17 as a simply supported column of length l. The maximum buckling load
A : 21000 psi that can be applied to this column is given by
^ lf'I1ol
I'
(8.1 la)
The strength of the column must be equal to or greater than the cylindrical shell.
For large diameter shell the curvature is small and the buckling streneth of the
shell approaches that of a simply supponed flat plate. The riinimuit critical
buckling strength of the simply supported plate abcd (Fig. 8.17) loaded in the
circumferential direction is given by
_ 4i2Enl ----=-
4T2EJ
I'c, =;r=- _
t-tr - lt-t = t'
(8.1 lb)
.ing..
By comparing expressions 8. 1la and 8. I lb, it can be concluded that in order
Fisure 8.15 for the column aD to be as strong as the plate, its length must be about one-half
8,5 ATTOWABTE GAPS IN STIFFENING RINGS 233
S]
L.ngth of.ny g.p in u6eppo.r.d .lt nor o Figure 8.17
.r..sd l.ngrh ol .c ih*. in Fig. UG.29_2
that of the plate. Therefore, the maximum gap length must be one-half that of
a buckling lobe length of a cylindrical shell. In referring to Fig. 5.16 the
maximum gap length can be expressed as
-_l
g_;_-;; _ ttD. (8. l2)
_l
_+
^';
- Typ. ot onttrucrio.
ASME has developed curves that are based on Eq. 8.12. These curves are
1xa- shown in Fig. 8.18. A comparison, however, between Eq. 8.12 and Fig. 8.18
indicales some differences. These differences are due to the fact that Fig. 5.18,
which is used with Eq. 8.12, is plotted using the first two terms of expression
fl in Eq. 5.27a whereas Fig. 8.18 uses all terms. Therefore, the results of Fig.
8.18 are more accurate.
Tht larion lhatt h!v. mfr@r ot
i...ri. r.qui4d to. nng.
Figur' 8 6 voriou
Example 8.7. What is the maximum gap allowed in a stiffening ring of a shell
L : 15.0 ft, and r : 1.0 in.?
1 orrong€rnenrs oI rrittuning ring. for cyrindri.or vessers 3ubiecd ro exrernor
(Ref. 2).
preasure
with D. = 7.O ft,
Solution
L=
'-:
t
t+
r
a.zs
232
8.6 OUI-OF.ROUNDNESS OF CYTINDRICAT. 5HIItS
G ::+
(4X4)
: o.2oD^
-
d
!
G = 16.8 in. T
"":#ii .s
8.6 OUT.OF-ROUNDNESS OF CYLINDRICAL SHELLS UNDER
EXTERNAL PRESSURC
3,6+Id ;
"+r3
= In the fabrication of cylindrical shells, slight out-of-roundness invariably results.
*"""p;'L; E3 This is due to forming, welding, or postweld heat-treating operations. Normally,
$-E intemal pressures tend to minimize out-of-roundness, whereas extemal pres-
d;:; ";: sures tend to increase it. Because of that, and to prevent failure, extra pre-
cautions must be taken in fabricating shells that are subjected to external pres-
;a sures.
In Fig. 5. 16 it is assumed that the shell is approximated by a series of columns
s!
5= connected end to end. The length of each column is one-half a lobe length, or
nDo
E bet ,=
-2N
-5
;IJ The slendemess of each column is expressed by the ratio //r where r is the radius
=_- of gyration. Since r is eqtal to t2/\/12 in a shell wall. the equation becomes
@i
o5
t_ 5.44
r N(t/D.)
g gfig g F 8I 889 S R
The eccentricity of each column in expressed by e. If it is assumed that the
rTog'reu1lq1 - neurrg epcrng eccentricity ratio e/r affects the strength of a column in the same way as the
shell, it can be concluded that
el for columns
rr
and
e
------ca-
5.44
for cylinders
t/y12 N(t/D.)
234
DESION OF CYI.INDRICAI. SHELLS
I
I u
!:t c'
N(t/D)
(8. r 3) I I @E
V I oB
: /
where C1 1.57.
Experiments have shown that for constant tfD, ratios, the value of eft tl / I
increases with an increase inLf D.ratios. This, however, applies only in the case
of intermediate length shells. For this range, Eq. 8.13 was found to give ade- ( / /
quate results. As the length gets longer, tests have shown than an increase in
L/D"has no influence on ef t. On the other hand, tests have shown that as the
length decreases, the value of e/l increases slightly. Thus, Eq. 8.13 needs
modification to take into account the two extreme cases. Thus. disreeardins the
increase in e/t as L/D. decreases. an empirical equation of the fo;
/
/,1 "1
/t 4ls
il I
t q QE
I
*:1 t- . E=
9: Ct . f q 66
t N(Jf,j- "'"
..'- n
/
I
I I o €o
/ ct €.0
is found satisfactory. In using the values of C1 and C2 as obtained from tests, the
equation becomes
/ / I I
I I P6
/
C : o, o,'=8
+ o.ol5N (8.14)
dF
t N(t / D")
I E
,9d
Example 8.8. Calculate the maximum out-of-roundness allowed in a cylinder 3.ssps F s 8 t I tt3R8
subjected to extemal pressure with D, 5.0 ft, Z : 14.0 ft, and t -
0-75 in- : rTog rcurralql; lraueqq epnrng
Compare the result with that obtained from Fig. 8.19.
Solution
D-
R
5.60 t
= to
237
2il D|lrol{ o; cYuNDilcAr tH[t3 NOMINCIATURI 239
From Fig, 5.18, N = 3. From Eq. 8.14,
o,: -0.062510
n/t (8.1s)
f nnrr -l
&=3=roo
, u.)
8.7 DESIGN FOR AXIAT COMPRESSION From Fig. 8. 11,
Eo = 29 x 106 psi
For axial compression, Eq. 5.29 rnay be written as For elastic region,
: 12,600 psi
or
For plastic region,
A:ltEot:99
RJt
A =W: o.ooo87
The allowable strain can be expressed as
and
: modulus of elasticity tk)lt, M., "A Procedule for Determining the Allowable Out-of-Roundness for Vessels under
E6 External Pressure," in Pressure Vessel and Piping Desiqfi: Collected PaPers 1927-1959,
F : peak stress as denned in Table 8.2 American Society of Mechanical Engineering, New York, 1960.
REFERCNCES
ASME Boiler and Pressue Vessel Code, Section Vm, Division 2, Alrs rnative Rules-pressure
Vessels, ANSVASME BPV-Vn-2, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New york,
1980.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VItr, Division l, prcssure Vesrels,
ANSUASME BPV-Vm-I, American Society of Meahanical EDgineers, New york, 1980.
CHAPTER
Inside surfoce of o vessel hecd. (Courtosy of the Nooler Corp.. St. to'rir, Mo.)
243
2U DISION OT IORMED HTADS AND TRANSITION SECTIONS 9.I INTRODUCTION 245
9.I INTRODUCTION
A large variety of end closures and transition sections are available to the desisn
engineer. Using one configuration versus another depends on manv factors suih --r-.
as method of forrning, material cost, and space ."ihi"tionr. Some frequently
used heads are: ].'
(a) FLANGED
Flanged Heads. (b) HEI.lISPHERICAL
These heads (Fig. 9.1c) are normally found in vessels operating at low
pressures such as gasoline tanks, and boilers. They are also used-in high-
pressure applications where the diameter is small. Various details for their
design and construction are given by the ASME Code, VI[-l.
Hemispheical Heads.
_1
_T
,
Generally, the required thickness of hemispherical heads due to a grven
temperature and pressure is one-half that of cylindrical shells with equivalent
diameter and material. Hemiheads (Fig. 9.10) are very economical when
(c) ELLIPTICAL (d) FLAIIGED & DISHED
PR
(e.1)
2SE - O.zP
This equation with E : 1.0 is plotted in Fig. 6.3 and it approximates the more
complicated Eqs. 6.7 over a large range of r'fri- Othet forms of Eq. 9. 1 are
shown in Appendix I.
For external pressure, Eq. 6.35 is taken as the basis for the ASME Code
equations. Defining e". : A, r : R,, and modulus of elasticity as Es, Eq. 6.35
can be written as
0.t25
{a) ASiIE 2:1 Head Es R"/t
I "
. 0.125
R"/t
(9.2a)
(b)
T where A = critical shain
ASI.IE Flanged and 0ished Head R, = outside radius
fisure 9.3
t : thickness
246
214 DISION Of FORMED HTADS AND TRANSITION STCTIONS 9,3 ASME DESION EQUATIONS 249
The critical strcss in a sphcrical section is given by lixamplc 9.1. Using the ASME criteria, determine the allowable cxternrl
R, = 60 in. and t : 0.5 in. Use the 300'F line
prcssure on a spherical shell with
a*: P",R. in Fig.8.ll.
Zt
Solution, From Eq. 9.2a,
or
n rs l
A:ffi=0.00r
= 2%
P.,
R"/t=4+
R./t
(e.3)
Equations 9.2 form the ASME basis for determining allowable external pres-
sure for sDherical sections.
- : il'. (-tl] (e.6)
DISION Oi TORMID HEADS AND TRANSIIION SICTIONS
A plot of this equation is also shown in Fig. 9.4. The ASME Code uses the K -j :LLi - lts ttl ,^=
values given by Eq. 9.6 to determine the required stress ratios needed in obtain_ )o
l -l 6o
do
ing thickness of ellipsoidal heads. This is accomplished by multiplying the I // q-:
calculated thickness of a cylindrical shell with diameter D by'K valuis. Hince, do
for ellipsoidal heads, a
ct
ci
(e.7) rt
zSE - 0.2P 3*3533
ss€J1s ur\oJc 01 sseJ,ls xour Jo o|1ou
where t : thickness of ellipsoidal head
ur^rr r
P = internal pressure
D = diameter of shell to which head is attached
l< = sfiess intensity factor obtained from Eq. 9.6
S : allowable stress
6 = joint efficiency
For torispherical heads, tests conducted by H<ihnr and others have shown that
the stress at the knuckle area due to internal pressure reaches the yield value long
before the spherical region does. Hrjhn plotted an empirical equation that cor_
relates well with available test data, as shown in Fig. 9.5. To ivaluate Hcihn's
empirical curve, Fig. 9.5 shows anotler curve that indicates the stress rn an
251
DIsION O? TORMID HTADS AND IRANSITION SICTIONS 9.3 ASMI DISIGN IOUATIONS 253
equivBlent ellipsoidal head whose thickness is equal to the shell thickness. This
curve indicates that Hrihn's curve is liberal for small values of knuckle to crown + - z.z4,,os!) + rs.oszr(r)] r" I (9.10)
radri r/L. Accordingly, the ASME Code, VIII-I, developed an empirical curve fo.oozw
that parallels both Hdhn's curve for large values of rfL and the ellipsoid curve | /r\
for small r/Z ratios, as shown in Fig. 9.5. The ASME curve can be expressed + 10.26879 x 10 a - 0.442621;l +
by the equation
L \U/ ' "'-,(;i]l('";)]'
where t : required torispherical thickness
n =)(z + (e.8) -L : spherical crown radius
r = knuckle radius
Thus the ASME equation for the torispherical heads is given by
D = diameter of shell to which head is attached
PLM P : intemal pressure
(9.e)
zSE - O.zP S: allowable stress
where r : thickness of torispherical head
A plot of Eq. 9.10 is shown in Fig. 9.6.
P = internal pressure
Z = spherical crown radius Example 9,2. :t ifD = 144 in.,
What is the required thickness of a 3 head
M = stress intensity factor obtained from Eq. 9.9 P= 100 psi, S: 17,500 psi, E: 1.0?
S = allowable stress
g = joint efficiency Solutian. From Eq. 9.6, with a/b = 3,
o"/FS
= (0, *,,;);.,'(, -,,;)(i) - o 0006 Example 9.3,
D=24O in., L=2AO in.,
What is the required thickness of a flanged and dished head
r: 15 in., S:17.500 psi, E= 1.0,
if
and
P : 50 psi?
Sglving. for and
_r fetting or/FS
:S, the following approximate equarion
obtained and used by the ASME Code, VIII-2:
Solution.
l;rrrn Eq.9.tl.
l-
M=zG+vr6)
: 1.75
From Eq. 9.9,
t:-
50x240x1.75
'-2xl7joox1.o-02x50
: 0.60 in.
Because the thickness is obtained from Eq. 9.9 and because this thickness is
.17 l2: I Etl,plo'dar h€.d) small compared with the diameter of the head, the requirements of Eq. 9. l0 must
be checked.
r15
D 240
: 0.0625
P 50
;J 17,500
= 0.002857
/r\ :
ln l;l
\L/
-s.54851
o.oo38e
;=
t = 0.93 in.
9.6
9.3.1 Ellipsoidol ond Torisphericol Heods under Exlernol Pressure
Figure Required Thickne.s of Formed Heods (Courre.y of lhe Ane.icon Sociery of /vtechonicol
Ensineers.)
For extemal pressure, the knuckle area is subjected to a tensile stress. Hence the
critical area that is necessary for consideration under extemal pressure is the
! spherical region. Thus the ASME criteria for all ellipsoidal and torispherical
I heads under extemal pressure are the same as those for spherical heads.
254
116 DIIIO}I O' IOTMID H!ADs AND TRANSITION SGCTIONS
9.4 ASME EQUATIONS FOR CONICAT HEAD DESIGN 257
9.4 ASME EQUATIONS FOR CONICAL HEAD DESIGN
"\ I
T]--+. l+I
From Example 6.7 it is seen that the hoop force Np is twice
as large as the
longitudinal force N5 in conical heads subjected to internal pr"rr*".
Th" ASME
Code, VI[-I, uses Eq. 1 of Example 6.7 as the basis for establishing the
required thickness of a conical section subjected to intemal pressure.
The Jqua_ 2raon6
tion is given by
PD
_ (e.l l)
I' +ilvl_t -nT r
\l
I
I
2 cos a(Str' 0.6p)
,l
where P = internal pressure
D = inside diameter of cone at the point of consideration
I ?
measured
perpendicular to the longitudinal axis _t_ ___L
,S = allowable stress Fig'rr€ 9.7 Discontinuiiy iorcas dus ro internol preslur€.
g = joint efficiency
a = one-half the included apex angle of the cone at the center line of where, in this chapter, a is used rather than q' and X and Y are given by
the cone
X= 4.559U2 tan d
9.4. What is the required thickness of a conical head attached to
a
.
"I:TOr"whose inside
cyllnder diameter is 40.0 in. if the intemal pressure is 450 psi, the
Y = 1.316(V - 2V) tan a
allowable stress is 20,000 psi, E = 1.0, and a
= 20.0? and V and V2 are given as in Example 6.9.
Solution. From Eq. 9.11, The longitudinal stress in Eq. 9.12 is in tension for all values of a and does
not govem the design criteria. The f term in the circumferential stress expression
in Eq. 9.12 is positive for all practical applications. Hence the quantity a" varies
from a maximum tensile value of Prft to a compressive value that depends on
(2X0.940X20,000 x 1.0 - 0.6 x 450) the angle a. The ASME Code, VIII-I, limits the maximum compressive circum-
= 0.49 in. ferential stress to a value of Pr/r. Using these criteria, the quintity yl|rt;n
I Eq. 9.12 must be limited to a value of 2.0. Values in excess of 2.0 must be
9.4. I ASME Simplificotion of Discontinuity Anolysis due fo Iniernol supported by a ring added at the junction. The area of the ring is given by the
rressur€ equatron
The ASME Code, VtrI-1, uses the stress expressions obtained (Y\EIt -
in Example 6.9 tr2 tan q 2)
f9r inlernal pressu€ as the basis for establisiing simplified l.ite.iu
tinuity analysis at the cylinder-to-cone junction. At ihe large end
fo, dir"on_
of the cone
2 Y\6rt
(e.13)
,=!(o'+x{rz\ t2tanall
, ['
400 \ (9.14)
(9.12)
""=7(, - rrn The ASME Code,
1.5SE and thus
VI[-l, limits the comnressive circumferential stress to
258 DTSION OF fORMTO I{TADS AND TRANSITION SECTIONS 9,4 ASMT IQUATIONS FOR CONICAL HIAD DISIGN 259
t.o liquation 9. l5 is used by thc ASMB Cirde , Vl ll- I , as thc bitsis litr chccking
lllc.ioint bctween the cylinder and the large end of cone due to internal prcssuro.
o.e At thc small end ofthe cone (Fig. 9.7) the circumferential and longitudinal stress
o cquations due to internal pressure are
S
/
X=O.C t2 6-
\-7
,: !(o '-',4)
(9.16)
'7Li =,r.5591 'z Lan o\
o.2
--2 <=-l---<ly,o.brri
I
""=?('- ",4)
4 tO'
!Y= 1.3t6<,V | -zvz tLonc,.
30' 40. SO.
Because both expressions include a negative term, the equation for or controls
because X is numerically larger than Z Limiting the maximum compressive
o<
stress to Pr/t, the term in parentheses in the equation for o1 is
Figure 9.8 X ond Y volues for externot prossurc.
< 1.5
l.sSE :A
t and a stiffening ring is needed for values of XYr/t greater than 1.5. The
required area of the stiffening ring is
'l
Prl ran q l- t.s
E [ssz, l_=-=-tl
zSE I
_.:l
xt/r,/tl
V7= ! P
From Fig. 9.8, it is shown that the quantity X is approximated by 0.012a. Hence
Equation 9.14 thus becomes the required area can be expressed as
^,=G('_ --
tan
(9.r7)
" 1t^" 2sE L' d,rtl
or for the large end of cone,
By assuming that the maximum allowable longitudinal stress is limited to ,St,
the expression
. P,1 /. A\ t"
o':2sE\'-i) (9.15) Pr.
SE =;
where A, = required area of ring
P = intemal pressure can be substituted into Eq. 9.17 to give for the small end of cone,
=
12 radius of cylinder at large end of cone
J= allowable stress ^': #(' - *) "" " (9.18)
t : joint efficiency
A = 326.6\/FEE where A = *G
a= one-half the apex angle of cone r, = radius of cvlinder at the small end of cone
-*"--"W*-ffiUfY6ffiU'iii,aibt
iio mmnror uapng 9,.1 ASrvU IOUAT|ONS fOR CONICAI HIAD DlllON 261
Exanple 9.5. Doslgn thc conc ehown in Fig. 9.9 and check the cone-to-shcll and the required area
I junctions. L€t S = 20 ksi, E = 1.0, and p = 150 psi.
Solutian. From Eq. 9.11, ,=ffi(t-1ff)<o.sttt
= 3.70 in.2 I
100)
9.4.2 Conicol Shells under Exlernol Pressure
The goveming equation for the design of cones subjected to extemal pressure is
For the large end,
obtained from @. 6.43. Using a factor of safety 3.0, Eq. 6.43 becomes
For small end 9.4.3 ASME Simplificotion of Discontinuity Anolysis due to Externol
Presgure
A=89 = 7.71 The discontinuity forces due to external lnessurea at the large end of cone are
shown in Fig. 9.10 and expressed as
{irtt*-
Fisurc 9.9
_:I_
figur. 9.10 DLconrinulty for.e. dua lo cx|lrnol pr€!!ure,
262 DI3ION OI IORMTD HIADS AND NANSTTION STCTIONS 9.4 ASMI EQUATIONS TOR CONICAT HEAD DESIGN 263
lly limiting the axial stress to an allowable value of SE, the above equation can
u,__p_!t*r{^r,
I I''' bc written for large end of the cone,
(e.20)
'--&1'-"2)
r\ t/ o'=*'#""1'-i(|*2.4):] (9.2r)
A,: (N,tanr(;;)lt _ (Prz/N,) - 1f or N, s 0, which indicates that at the small end of the cone the axial force N,
O .027 a\/ r2/ t l must be resisted by a ring with an area for the small end of the cone
Figure 9.ll
o(
X ond Y voluer for externol pressure.
pressure load at small end stiffening n"t: O!&i#
2U DTSION Of TORMID HIAOS AND TRANSITION SECTIONS
NOMENCLATURI
'Ii)t l l()td itt lirrgc cnd duc ttl axial conrprcssitln, prcssurc Ily using
on conc, an<I pressure rr1 = E,A. thc above equation reduces to
on cylinder is
Ar2 A,
!. eliffi*
(e.26)
, = +tan q +, tun o+
which is the required moment of inertia of a cone-to-shell stiffening ring.
or For design purposes, the value of A in Eq. 9.26 is obtained from a
stress-strain relationship. This is achieved by considering the stress in the ring
F = P(M) +, tan 0 (9.24) as
where Fr
(9.27)
t,_r2tana, Lt ri- rl
Applying a factor of safety of two in the foregoing equation and using the
Extemal Pressure Charts in ASME (hat have a factor safety two), a design
Total load at small end due to axial compression, pressure on cone, and pressure criteria can be established as follows:
on cylinder is
1. Calculate f. from Eqs. 9.24 or 9.25.
^ Prttan c + PL,
/"= -=- + 14 - r? -r f,
2. Establish
z^ I =-P
br2 t0ll d
t?trr ct
F = P(N) + f2 tar, d. (9.2s) 3. Enter the Extemal Pressure Charts with a (factor B) and calculate the
strain A.
where 4. Use Eq. 9.26 to establish the minimum required moment of inertia. The
ASME allows a 307o increase in value if the composite ring-shell mo-
ment of inertia is considered and the equation then becomes
rv=?tun o+L:
L Z
+:3 lrl
O/2 l&Il (t
ADZA,
Equations 9.24 and,9.25 establish the maximum applied force at the cone_to_ 15.6
cylinder junction. The critical buckling stress of a iircular ring is
o" : 3Eol
nr, NOMENCTATURE
where A, is the total effective area given by A: strain as obtained from Fig. 8.10
At : area of stiffening ring at cone-to-shell junction
A' =
Lj + e,
+ for large end of cone
+ ,B = stress factor as obtained from Fig. 8.11
Lj D: diameter
A' =
+ + + e, for small end of cone
D1 : base diameter at small end of cone
26 OISION O' IORMID HTAO3 AND TRANSITION SICTIONS Bf sf.tooRAPHY 267
.1. Bourdtnun, l{, C., "Strc$scs al Junction ol Conc and Cylindcr in Tanks with Cono Bottuns or
l)r - base diumeter at large end of cone Ends" in Prc.rsare ye.rszl aul Piping Design: Colkcted papers 1927-,/9Jg, Amcrican Socicty
6 = joint efficiency of Mechanical Engineers, 1960.
4. Jawad, M. H., "Design of Conical Shells under Extemal Loads,,' Jounnl of pressure Vessel
8s = modulus of elasticity Technology, pp. 230-238. Vol. t02, 1980.
, = head depth
I = moment of inertia BIBLIOGRAPHY
lK : factor for ellipsoidal heads as determined from Eq. 9.6
Fliigg€, W., Strcrrer ir, S,ells, Springer-Verlag, New york, 1960.
Z = spherical crown radius of flanged and dished heads
Z' = effective length of cylindrical shell
L" : effective length of conical section
= 70 + Dt/D:.l
M= factor for flanged and dished heads as obtained from Eq. 9.g
P = pressure
P" = allowable extemal pressure
It = inside radius
R, = outside radius
r = knuckle radius
rr : base radius at small end of cone
/2 = base radius at large end of cone
S = allowable stress
r = thickness
t" = effective thickness of conical section
: tcos d
a = one-half the cone apex angle
4 : circumferential stress
(,r = longitudinal stress
REFERENCES
L Brownell, L. E., and E.H.Yorlll.g, Process Equipment Design, lolmWiley, New york, 1959.
2. Shield, R. T., and D. C. Drucker, "Design of Thin-Walled Torispherical and Toriconical
Pressure-Vessel Head,s" in Pressure Vessels anl Pipirrg: Design atd Anatysis-A Decade of
ProSleJr, Ameican Society of Mechaoical E4ineers, 1972.
CHAPTER IO
BLIND FIANGES, COVER
PLATES, AND FLANGES
Iypicolflons€: r.ody for in.tollins. (Courlesy G+W Tdylor-Bonmy Div., lqylor Forse)
264 269
SIIND fLANOTS, COVTR PIATES, AND TLANGES IO.I INTRODUCTION 271
IO.I INTRODUCTION
One of the more common types of closures for pressure vessels is the unstayed
flat head or cover. This may be either integrally formed with the shell or welded
to the shell, as shown in Fig. 10.1; or it may be attached by bolts or some
quick-opening device as shown in Fig. 10.2. It may be circular, obround,
square, rectangular, or some other shape. Those circular flat heads that are
I .--.i.nil
Fetaining i--l lhl/il
i --ltll-llll
rhreaded
I ll'hl- "*
\
-J- -t+-u--
(d)
(a) (b)
bolted into place utilizing a gasket are called blind flanges. Usually, the blind
flange is bolted to a vessel flange with a gasket between two flanges as shown
in Fig. 10.3. Although flat heads or blind flanges may be either circular or
noncircular, they usually have uniform thickness. In addition to the flat head or
blind flange+ype closures, many large vessels use a circular, spherically dished
cover with a bolting flange, as shown in Fig. 10.4. In all cases, the bolts ofthe
head attach either to a bolting flange on the end of the shell or to a thickened
shell.
In general, "failure" of a bolted flanged joint is due to excessive leakage at
't the gasket, with very few failures in the metallic pressure boundary. Occa-
t- sionally, problems encountered with bolts result from excessive tightening in
I
T
|-.............. reducing the leakage problem during hydrostatic testing of the assembly. Some-
T|-?\ I
times excessive stresses in the bolts cause them to break or to stretch until the
I I
)Fi
tt I
closure leaks.
-)-"--w The basic equations used for the design of flat plates and blind flanges in the
(e) ASME Code, VI[-1, are based on a flat plate with uniform thickness and
Figoro l0,l Int srol or wlld€d tlct h€ods. uniform loading over the entire surface due to pressure. Depending upon the
r0.t tNTRoDUcTtoN 273
dc(ails of the corner construction shown in Fig. 10.5, various C-factors are used
that require different minimum head thicknesses. The maximum deflection of
l
I the plate is assumed as not more tltan one-half the thickness and all the stresses
are keDt within the elastic limit.
icmkor!!dd .tth.^..2t,
_- _^_ jrr
r,rf l:l'^ ,.. .,. '
i-- L- _ i
'hnror75n ,,-,.,.i'i-'::l
ffi:.,,,M
1"6;,: .' lt M,.,,.:r:-
.WZ
14/4,.1,, l;
|', 1
i_4;"
rn:-,^.'o.25,,'"' {ll $-
",+#'
c'o.r7o,
L",Jr{-
c. o.r?
|c-033D "''^* **'
- -VA ":J^H:" #l-r.,
c.o3o
C.0.10 C m'n..0.20 C-o.20or0.13
(rt lb ll lb.2t l.)
h
lU-\ca,rer
'.1__{|I
Kiucrh \
! R.d,u' \
ffiSt
t [.\ i
| firj'I
\ c-0,33
Loos F1169. Typ.
Gastel -l-1n c::
|-1/2A-''--.------.1 + @*4
I F-l/a la 8l+ )I dllNni
I I .#f,
---?,,/-"), f
ll\l
r{lf
ll
ll
a f
I
T
t-
I
rcKl
t 1- h+
1t2 I C.
t2c C - O.2S o.33
tbt (d)
Figure l0-4 Sphericolly dish€d cove|'s with bolting flonses. (Courte.y Americon Socisry of Mechdn.col 10.5 Un3toyod flor heods dnd covers. (Court6y Americon Soci€ry of r{€€honicol Ensineerc,
Fis',r€ tom Fis.
[nsino6r', ftom Fig. l-6 of rhe ASr{E Code, V I-i.) UG-3,1 of rhe ASME Codo, Vlll-I.)
272
IO.2 CIRCUTAR TIAT PI.ATTS AND HEADS WITH UNITORM TOADING 275
274 BTIND FI,ANOTS, COVTR PTATTS, AND fIANGES
IO.2 CIRCULAR FI.AT PLATES AND HEADS WITH UNIFORM w^ = 0.0B6# ( 10.5)
TOADING
Tangential stress at edge equals
When an exact solution involving a discontinuity analysis at the shell-to-head
juncture is not wanted, flat heads are generally calculated based on the assump-
tion that the edges are simply supported or fully fixed. The true condition lies o': O'Ilrcf; (10.6)
somewhere between.
Exact equations for circular plates were developed in Section 7. l. In using
Radial and tangential stress at the center equals
those equations as a basis, the equations below were developed using the head
diameter d instead of the radius term a. The following nomenclature was also
substituted in the equations of Section 7.1: ^ . -_ P
OI: OI = U'IJJ'i (10.7)
Maximum deflection is located at the center and equals Example 10.1. Determine the maximum stress in a flat head under internal
presswe of 1000 psi, diameter / = 48 in., and thickness r = 7 in. for both
simple-supported and fixed-edge conditions. Assume carbon steel with
w* = 0'0554# (10.2)
fr = 0.3.
Maximum rotation is located at the edge and equals Solutian. Determine the total loading
,, = 0.239
-1109-(xx)t
!l--lj-: tlttzopsi I head-to-shell juncture (see Fig. 10.5) and contains a factor to
increase effectively the allowable stress to 1.5 S because the stress
is predominandy a bending stress
Example 10.2. For the flat head in Example 10. l, determine the deflection at
the center for both edge conditions. d = effective diameter of head (in.) (see Fig. 10.5)
t = minimum required thickness of flat head (in.)
Solution, For simple-supported edge use Eq. 10.2:
Example 10.3. Determine the minimum required thickness of an integral flat
rr R09,000x48f head with intemal pressurep equal to 1000 psi, S = 15,000 psi, d = 48 in. with
w= 0.0554* x
r.l toltzt' = u'uzrz rn'
no corrosion, and no weld joints within the head (E = 1.0). The arrangement
is the same as that given in Fig. 10.5, sketch , - 2, with m : l.O.
For fixed edge use Eq. 10.5:
Solation. From Fig. 10.5, sketch b - 2, C = 0.33 m: 0.33(l) = 0.j3.
From Eq. (10.10),
, = 0.0136#" r0.)or24gx4l
= 0.0057 in. I
0.33 x 1000
:
Problems
t=48 15,000 x 1.0
7.120 in. I
10.1 What is the maximum shess in a simple-supporied flat head whenp : 56
Example 10.4. Determine the minimum corner radius to make Example 10.1
psi, d: 24 in., t:0.75 in., and p = 0.3t acceptable (valid) to be used.
10.2 What is the maximum stress for the conditions in hoblem 10.1 usins the
simplified equation? PR 1000 x 24
'l::=---------:
sE - o.6P = 1.667 in.
15,000x1 - 0.6x1000
Answer: c,,," = 15,820 psi
From Fig. 10.5, sketch b - 2, the rule is for
In the ASME Code, Vm-1,1 and Section I,2 the minimum required thickness of 10.3 A flat head is constructed according to Fig. 10.5, sketch d. The diameter
circular, unstayed flat heads and covers without bolting are calculated by the d = 12in., thickness r = l.25in.,E: l.0,andS = 15,000psi. What
lollowine: is the MAWP (maximum allowable working pressure)?
IO.4 COMPARISON OF THEORY AND ASMT CODE FORMULA FOR provcd according to the code the dcsigner should recognizc th t s(nr1c calcu
CIRCUTAR FLAT HEADS AND COVERS WITHOUT BOLTING lltions can be avoided. If the flange is the type described in Appentlix 2 ol thc
ASME Code, the code permits using flanges with recognized standards that
As previously mentioned, the ASME Code formula contains a factor of 1.5 cstablish items such as dimensional standards, materials, and pressure/temper-
within the C factor to adjust for the permitted higher level of allowable stress ature ratings. The code accepts flanges designed to ANSI 816.5 .,pipe Flanges
because it is chiefly caused by primary bending stress. If the 1.5 value is and Flanged Fittings,"6 API 605 "Large Diameter Carbon Steel Flanges",T and
removed from the values of C, the range of C values in the code adjusts to ANSI 816.24 "Bronze Flanges and Fittings, 150 and 300 lb,'.8 Several other
C = 0.15 to C = 0.5. Rearranging Eqs. 10.8 and 10.9 into the same form as standards are not included; however, when the flanges are selected by this
Eq. 10.10, we see that C : 0.15 through C : 0.5 encompasses the two ex- method, no additional calculations are required to satisfy the ASME Code.
hemes from fully fixed edges where C = 0.188 to simply supported edges When calculations are necessary according to Appendix 2 of the ASME
where C = 0.309. Code, VIII-I, for a nonstandard design or when it is desired to upgrade a
The low value of C : 0.15 in the ASME Code is for a special head-to-shell standard flange, similar design calculations are required for blind flanges (circu-
configuration with an inside comer radius of at least three times the head lar flat heads with bolts) and for regular bolted flanges. Although each item is
thickness. The structural effect of this edge condition results in reducing the discussed in geater detail in the following paragraphs, the basic steps in de-
equivalent pressurized diameter on the circular flat head from the normal di- signing a flange are as follows:
ameter d to a diameter of 0.893d such that the Eq. 10.9 becomes
l. Establish design pressure and design temperature.
o=orssp(o8e'il=r"(il (10.11)
2. Select gasket material and dimensions and facing type. Calculate N
and b.
3. Calculate loads for both gasket seating and operating conditions.
4. Determine bolting sizes and gasket width check.
IO.5 BOLTED FTANGED CONNECTIONS
5. Establish flange dimensions (usually using those from a standard flange).
The most usual type of joint for easy assembly and disassembly used in the 6. Using loads and dimensions, calculate moments for both qasket seatine
process vessels and piping system is the bolted flanged connection. A convenient and operating conditions.
method to design and calculate flanges with ring-type gaskets that are within the 7. Determine required thickness of flange.
bolt circle was first published by Taylor Forge in 1 937 . 3 These rules were further
developeda and incorporated into the ASME Code, VI[-l, some years later.
These rules, which are still used to calculate this type of flange, are in Appendix 10.6 CONTACT FACINGS
2 Of thE ASME COdC, VIII.1.
Rules for calculating flat face flanges with metal-to-metal contact outside of For ring+ype gasket design as given in the ASME Code, VI[-I, Appendix 2,
the bolt circle are given in Appendix Y ofthe ASME Code, VI[-1. This design several types of flange facings are used. Some of the more usual types are the
incorporates a self-energizing-type gasket such as the O-ring gasket. fhe origi- raised face, the tongue-and-groove, and the lapjoint. When these types are used,
nal rules were restricted to analyzing identical pairs of flat face flanges. Current the full seal loading is taken by the gasket because no other part of the face is
rules have been improved to permit analysis of both identical and nonidentical in contact with the adjacent face.
pairs of flanges. In addition to the types of facing where the gasket must carry the seating load,
Further development of design rules in the ASME Code, VI[-1,5 came with one type of closure and facing depends upon the adjacent faces to be in contact
the issuance of reverse flange rules that use a ring-type gasket with no additional with each other, but it does not require a large seating load for initial sealing.
contact of the faces. These rules were added to Appendix 2, ASME Code, This kind of closure is used on both the ring-type gasket design of Appendix 2
VIII-I. and the flat face flanges with metal-to-metal contact outside the bolt circle as
In addition to these rules for flange design in the code, many designs are used described in Appendix Y ofthe ASME Code, VIII-1. This construction utilizes
in which rules are not in the ASME Code. One common type is the full-face a self-energizing or pressure-actuated O-ring gasket that is internally pressurized
gasket flange. There are many others that may be designed for ASME Code to seal the gasket and does not depend upon initial gasket seating by the bolts
approval by meeting the requirements of U-2(g) of the ASME Code, VIII_I. that cause compression of the gasket (Fig. 10.6).
Before any flange design calculations are performed for a vessel to be ap_ There are also special types of gaskets and facing designs that become self-
ETIND TTANOES, COVTR PIATIS, AND IIANOES 10.7 GASKETS 281
FACING DETAILS
o. Sell
r0.7 GASKTTS
Energizing
A large variety of gaskets is needed in process equipment. The diverse pro-
O.Rin9
cesses, temperatures, pressures, and corrosion environment require gaskets with
different configurations, materials, and properties. Some of the frequently used
gaskets are:
b.
/
/'' -)
l\ l. Rubber O-rings
Cold tr.t.t Finbi
t Metallic O- and C-rings
Met.llic 3. Asbestos
Delta R ing
4
\T-
4.
I
6.
7.
8.
Flat metal
Spiral wound
Jacketed
Metal ring
High-pressure type
These gaskets shown in Fig. 10.7a are used extensively in low-pressure applica-
Ring & Bevel
Cold Water
tions such as storage tanks and air receivers. They are normally confined in a
Finish groove to prevent exhusion and their maximum temperature limit is about
250'F. Because the required seating stress is negligible, the number of bolts
Lap Joint Ring Joint needed in the flange is kept to a minimum. A groove finish of 32 rms is usually
\ -\-l
b=, I \-1\__r/T;'l
10.7.2 Metollic O- ond C-Rings
Wirh Searing
Nubbin
The metallic O- and C-Rings in Fig. 10.7b and c have a wide range of applica-
Figur. 10.6 Typicol Gocing d.roil.. tions for both extemal and internal pressures. They have a good springback
characteristic and a low seating stress. The gaskets may be manufactured from
widely selected matbrials compatible with the flange. This eliminates the prob-
lem of thermal expansion between the gasket and the flange and increases their
sealing frorn the gaskets rotation and deflection that are caused by contact applicable temperatue range.
loading ftom a retaining ring and head closure. Some of these are called the delta O- and C-gaskets seals along a contact line. Accordingly, a finish of about
gasket as used in Bridgeman closures, the double cone gasket, and the wedge 32 rms is needed in the flange seating surface to properly seal the gaskets. In
gasket. In all these cases, the initial gasket seating load is low. As the pressure critical applications a silver plating is specified to help sealing.
in the vessel is increased, the gasket rotates and deflects into a special facing in The O-rings manufactured in ftree different styles shown in Fig. 10.7c are the
which the sealing load increases as the pressure increases. Care must be taken unpressurized, pressurized, and vented types. The unpressurized one is used at
with this type of closure because the gasket often "seizes" and it may be difficult high temperatures whereby the increased pressure from the sealed gas cornpen-
!o get the closure apart. In many instances, the gasket may be silver, gold, or sates for the loss of strength. The vented ring gasket is used at high pressures
platinum plated to help prevent the "seizing." for better sealine.
r0.7 oAsKtTs
EtIND TTANOIS, COVER PIATES, AND TI.ANOES
ITil
ll I
_)l
(a) Rubber O-Ring (t) sp iru t
tressurized tessurized
I7I Htr
)t )t O- Ring
These gaskets (Fig. 10.7a) are made from a wide variety of materials that can
10.7.3 Compressed Asbestos Goskels be cut from sheet metal to any desired configuration and width. Some frequently
used gasket materials and their temperature limit are:
'fhese gaskets in Fig. lD.1d normally consist of 707o asbestos, 2O7o ntbber
hinder, and l0% filler material and curative. They can be cut to fit various shapes Max. Temp. ('F)
Material
und configurations such as heat exchangers with pass partitions and oval and
square openings. Thicknesses are normally fumished beween fr and i in' and Ipad 212
rcquire a seating surface finish of about 250 rms. Asbestos gaskets are normally Aluminum 400
used for tempemtures up to 850T. A rule of thumb for determining the adequacy
Brass 500
of Nbestos gaskets for a given temperature and pressure is to limit the product
of temperature in T times the pressure in psi to about 300,000. Copper 600
2t1 IUttlD ttaNots, covER ptaTts, AND FtaNors r0.7 oASKETS 285
Lens The metal ring gaskets shown in Fig. l0.1h are used in high-pressure and
temperature applications. Their small cross-sectional area makes them ideal for
compact flanges. The required high seating stress has the same magnitude as the
pressure stress. The rings are made from many varied materials and are some-
times silver plated to improve sealing. The gasket groove finish is about 63 rms.
"p=G/z
The lens ring- gaskets in Fig. 10.8 are normally used in small
flanges. Thc
:f:r.-::"j^",:1T19j ttgflanc:
rins. through points a to b, must be equal to or larger
!o pyent crushing of the gasket. Thus knowing
sin 0
f:_T::i1t-Tl p:
Ine nslde-dameler"fof the gasket and the required bolt
area, the outside diameter where R : spherical radius of gasket surface (in.)
can be calculated from
I: angle of friction (for mild steel, it is 20")
oo =llr,+ (D),]'/ l.'rom the geometry, the inside thickness of the flange is calculated from
The delta ring gaskets in Fig. 10.9 are extensively used in the United Staies for
high-pressure applications. These gaskets rely on the inside pressure to wedge
them in the gasket groove for sealing and thus do not requhe any initial seating
or bolting shess. The general dimensions that are shown in Fig' 10.9 apply to
rings of all diameters. The pitch diameter G is normally taken as
G=ID+0.125
Figur. 10.8 t.n. so3k6t,
and tlle gasket seating width N is usually equal to 0.125 in.
IIINO II.ANOIS, COVER PI.AT!S, AND FTANOES 10.7 oasKlts
Double-cone gaskets are very popular in Europe and can be fabricated in (cos 60)(aXc)(3)(yield strength of gasket material)
various
slzes. A typical detail is shown in Fig. 10.10. The required cross-sectional
area
is given by and the pitch diamet€r G is expressed as
f t 1tl2 G=OD-0'5N
OD = l:A, + (rD), I
L1r I The height of the gasket is usually set so that the net pressure force does not
where OD : outside diameter of gasket (in.) exceed the seating force. Thus,
ID : inside diameter of gasket (in.)
A, = actual bolt area of flange (in.r) tzxrr(|)<,- 60) = (P)(,r)
290 ITIND IIANOIS, COVTR PI.ATES, AND TIANOES
r0.7 GASKETS 291
'l'he operating condition exists when the hydrostatic end fbrce from the internal
dcsign pressure tends to open the joint, for the gasket retains enough resiliency
' ----(rXN)(sin
P
6o)
l() keep the joint tight. Loadings and stresses are determined at design pressure
rund design temperature. The loading for the operating condition is
To avoid crushing the gasket in those bolted flanged connections where the
10.7.12 Gcsket Design gasket is carrying all the loading, it is recommended that the initial loading does
not exceed the gasket seating stress y. Once the actual bolting areaA, is selecied,
cnaraderistics depend upon the material and the design of the a check may be made to determine the required minimum gasket width by the
!a1f1t.fei1e,_r-fhe
gasKet rtself. gasket faclor m and, the minimum design seating sEess )l irre fbllowine formula:
th: cTk"jjlry and the gasket marerial. flrhou;h-the rn and
P^l:':j:o,ro
tactors have been in the ASME Boiler and pressure Vessel
y
edition, they are suggested values only and are not mandatory.
CodJsince the 194i
The originat
N^"=ffi (10.14)
iesting and development of the m and y factors are described
ln an articii Uy
Rossheim and Markle that does not give the underlying background
specific.values. V9ry
for the Example 10.5. A vessel has the following design data: design pressure
changes have been made to ttiese faciors since they p= psi; design temperature = 250'F; a spiral-wound metal, fiber-filled
_fu* 250/U..
were originally published.
stainless steel gasket with an inside diameter of 13.75in. and widthN = l.0in.
the of many inquiries to the ASME Code Committee regarding the
.A.s
validity of-result
The gasket factors are m = 3.0 and y =
10,000. Bolts are SA-325 Grade I with
the m and J factors, a large-scale investigation has been undertaken :
& = Sa 19,200 psi. Is the gasket width sufficiendy wide to keep from crush-
by the hessure Vessel Research Committeero of the frelding Research
Councit. ing out?
As experimental tests progressed, it became obvious that thJrz
and y factors are
."J1t"9 t" many items not previously considered. There is a closJ corretation Sohttian. Determine the effective gasket seating width as follows: N =
with the amount of tightening of the bolts, the gasket type, and the
material, for 1.0 in., b" : N/2 = 0.5 in., b = 0.5!bo = 0.3535 in., effective gasket di-
thel are all related to the leakage rate of the j-oint. "
ameter ls
the_gasket tlpe and material have bCen selected, the effective gasket
.g.nc-e
width for cabulation may be determined. For solid flat metal and for
type joints' the basic gasket seating width bs is found by the formuras
thJ ring_ G = 13.75 + (2 x 1) - (2 x 0.3535)
rn column
I of Table 7-5.2 of the ASME C;de, VI[_l, whereas for all other types of G = 15'M3 in.
gaskets' ba is delermined by the formulas in column rI.
The effective gasket
seating width D is found by applying the following rules: Gasket loadings are
With D deiermined the location of the line of gasket load reaction can
H,= 2brGmp = 2(0.3535)r(15.043X3X2500) = 250,600
determined as well as the values of G and h6 for calculating
be
Wa : H * He = 444,1A0 + 250'600 : 694'700
flange moments.
designing a flange, it is important to recognize that two'desiln
.ln
cxrst-the gasket seating and the operating conditions. Gasket seattg
conditions W^z: rbGy = z(0 3535)(15.043X10'000) = 167,100
condition
fi = Sa :
cxlsts when an initial load is applied by the bolts to seat the gasket
at ambient Since 19,200 psi, W.r sets the bolting arca A^ as
tcmperature with no intemal pressure. The minimum initial
biolt loaO is
.. = 36.8( 19.200) :
fl^" W.z W^r
zlq000).(15.0a, 0 748 in versus I in' actual
s, ot
Sa
One-inch wide gasket is sufficient to prevent crushing. f where & : allowable bolting stress at room temperature (psi)
w:0.5(A.+Ars" (10.16)
IO.8 BOTTING DESIGN
Certain times during the operation of a process vessel the bolts in a bolted
In designing bolting for flanges, the initial item is selecting the bolting matenal. flanged connection are subjected to actual stresses in excess of the allowable
It must be a malerial compatible with the flange material . ihat is there musr nor design stresses. This may be especially true during hydrostatic testing. Care
, must be taken to enswe that during this testing, no permanent elongation ofthe
be any chemical or galvanic action between the bolting and ffange material
that bolting has occurred. If so, the bolting may have to be replaced before the vessel
would cause the bolts to seize in the tkeads. Under certiin circurn'stances,
rt may
be necessary to plate the bolts or to make them from special material is put into service. Realizing this is especially important if each of two suppliers
to prot€;t provides half of the bolted flanged assembly and one does not know what bolting
them from the environment. Although it is not neceisary to select a 6olting
material with a tensile shength close to that of the flange material, one should is supplied.
carefully consider the effects of strain elongation and rehxation of bolting
materials that have a high tensile strength and requte a smaller cross-secdona'i Example 10.6. A vessel flange uses 16-2-in. diameter bolts. Flange sfress
area.- In addition, when high sFength material is used for the bolting, calculations indicate that a flange thickness of t : 4.5 in. is adequate. The bolt
care must
be taken not to rcduce the number of required bolts to such a small -number circle diameter is C = 22.5 in. Will secondary bending stresses be developed?
that
excessive bolt spacing is developed. r I
Wlren the bo_lt spacing exceeds (U + t), secondary flange bending is devel- Solutian. The maximum permissible bolt spacing without a penalty is
oped between the bolts to the extent that it affects the ;ormal flange (2d + t1 = (2 x 2 + 4.5; = 3.5 in. The actual bolt spacing is
bending . To
account for this effect, the flange bending moment M0 must be iricreased
by the rd _ n(22.5\
Iactor
1V -]6- = +Az n.
actual bolt spacing
(10.l5) Because the actual spacing is less than the rnaximum spacing without a penalty,
no secondary bending shesses are developed. I
where d = nominal diameter of bolts (in.)
Example 10.7. Suppose a vessel requires Z-2 j -in. diameter bolts on a flange
t : flange thickness (in.) that is 5.5 in. thick. What is the madmum bolt circle that will not cause
secondary bending shesses? The minimum bolt spacing for 2 j -in. diameter bolts
To detennine the total required cross-sectional area of bolting, both the gasket is 5i in.
294 lutito ftaNolg, covER ptATEs, AND frANOrS IO.9 BI.IND FTANGES
lo'5 x 24
n = 80.2 in.
Anstrer: l.l2 )
10.7 The minimum spacing for the wrench to fit I |-in. diameter bolts is 3 | in. Fisurg lo.l I loodings on blind flons€.
IO.9 BTIND FTANGES This is identical with the equation in the ASME Code, VI[-l, except that the
constants of 0.3 and 1.9 are used in the code instead of the exact constants of
The minimum required thickness of a cicular, unstayed flat head or blind flange 0.31 and 1.91 and the gasket load G is substituted for d. The general ASME
attachedty bolts and utilizing a ring-type gasket that causes an edge moment is Code equation for circular flat-bolted heads is
derived from the assumption that the flat plate is simply suppofted; the gasket
load line G and is loaded by a gasket seating load or a combination of easket
loading and a uniform pressure loading . The combination of these loadingJat the (10.20)
gasket and at the bolt circle causes an edge moment ofMg/zrG, as shown-in Fig.
10.11. ff the edge moment ffi
is assumed to be equal ta Wh", tlre theoretical For the gasket seating condition, the internal pressure equals zero and the only
stress at the center of the flat plate is load is the gasket seating load W" at ambient temperature with the allowable
tensile stress of S.. The equation for gasket seating condition is
_3(3 + + 1 /wrrc\
tt)p (GY
"-
" :z F)-"G\-F) (10'17)
t=G (10.21)
Sening trc = 0.3 and E = weld joint efficiency within the flat plate,
For operating condition the intemal pressure p as well as the gasket loading are
sE:(*rye\-r..(W) (10.18) applied. For this condition, Wr : H + Il, at operating temperature with an
allowable tensile stress of S1. The equation for operating condition is
296 ITIND ?LANOI3, COVTR PLATIS, AND FTANOTS t0.9 EUND FTANOES
%= 700,800
-,
O.3p |.9W.rhc
t:G srE- s"EGt
The moment arm is determined from
t = ls.(Ml.
rF
hc = 0.5(C - G) = 0.5(22.5 - 15.043) = 3.729 in. x 1.0 (t7,500 x
v 17,500 1.0x15.043t
fJgt Pxample 10.5, the design loading for operating condition is lll.r = Therefore, the minimum required flange thickness is t : 5.329 in. I
694,700.
The minimum required thickness is determined as the greater thickness of
. that
dctcrmined for gasket seating load according to Eq. 10.i1 or for operating load
Problcms
rrccording to Eq. 10.22.
10.8 Suppose the flat head in Example 10.8 is made by butt-welding flat plates
l.i)r gasket seating, together. The welds are spot examined so that E = 0.85. What is the
minimum required head thickness?
,= _ ll.gwhc ts.o+:{ffi
uV .__.. I t.9(700.800x3.729) :4.343in.
s,uoi = Answer: t, n = 5.780 in.
298 IIIND IIANOIS, COVER PLATES, AND TLANOES IO,IO sOTTED fI.ANGED CONNECTIONS WITH RING.TYPE GASKETS
) (l
I ) (l
IO.IO BOTTED FTANGED CONNECTIONS WITH RING-TYPE GASKETS |
lr
The design_rules for bolled flanged connections with a ring+ype gasket that is (a) Moment Loadlng
entirely within a circle enclosed by the bolt holes and with no iontact outside of
are satisfactory. The trial-and-error method is essentially due to the complei Illll.
l-----v------J
theory used by Waters, Rossheim, Wesshom, and Williams to solve the problem 'tt 0z
in the original development. The WRWW method, which was ultimatelv incor_ (c) Combined Loadlng
porated into the ASME Code in 1940, is ar elastic analysis of the intiraction Figure '10.13 Flongo loodin$ for alo:ric anolysii.
between the vessel or pipe, the hub, and the flange ring assembly. The shell and
hub are resolved by a discontinuity analysis that was previously described in
Chapter 5 and the flange ring is considered as a flat plate with ihe center Dart flat plate is assurned as linear with no dishing effect and superposition is accept-
rcmoved (Fig. I0.13). Interactions of rotations and deflections are oermiited able.
until lhe balance is obtained. The solution of the complex problem is simplified for code use by cwves,
. The basic assumptions in the analysis are that the flange materials are elastic,
that is, no creep or_ plastic yield at lower temperature ocJurs, the bolt loading
formulas, and tables that contain constants depending upon the geometry of the
assumed or determined from the gasket factors, and the moments due
ii flange assembly. Formulas for various coefficients are given in the code that
to loadinss permits cornputer programming of the basic equations for rapid solution.
are essentially constant across the width ofthe flange. In addition, rotation The code designates flanges with ring-type gaskets to be three types for
of tie
EIIND FTANOIS, COVER PLATES. AND FTANOTS IO.IO BOTTTD TTANGED CONNECTIONS WITH RING.fiPE GASKETS 301
Bnalysis: int€grsl, loose, und optionul. lntegral means that the pipe, hub, and
ring are one continuous assembly from their original manufacture as eithcr
forging or casting welded together by full penetration welds. lnose means no
attachment of the assembly to the pipe or no ability of the juncture to carry sheafs
and moments other than those required to seal against pressure. These types of
I
I
flanges are called slip-on, lap joint, and threaded, and they may or may not havc 6
hubs. Optional means flange designs that, by construction, are integral, but thc
analysis is permitted by the simpler method for loose-type flanges. Examples of
these various types are depicted in Fig. 10.14.
The calculation of a flange with a ring-typ€ gasket first involves selecting the tr=
-tr_r F
E--
material for the flange, bolts, and gasket in a manner very similar to the blind el \__ d *--'t
flange. Next, the facing and gasket details are set, the loads due to intemal
presswe are determined, and the required bolting area and bolt sizes are selected.
The bolt circle is then decided; and the loads, moment ams, and moments due
(d)
1+ (.)
to both gasket seating and operatihg conditions are determined as with the blind
flange. By knowing these and the geometry used to determine K and other hub
coefficients, stress calculations are made for both conditions. The longitudinal
hub stress, the radial flange sness, the tangential flange stess, and their various
combinations are comparcd with allowable stresses.
The method of calculation is virtually identical for welding neck flanges and
slip-on or lap-joint flanges except that the axial pressure load is applied at a IT l-T
slightly different location. For the ring flange design, the tangential flange stress {-..*,o
is the only one calculated. The minimum required thickness can be directly 9t 12 l9lt\
determined from A 9 j 12
(s) (h)
tM* (10.23)
V s-B Opii.nrl lYF. Fl.n96.
,..I Th6. M.y b. C.ldl.r..t.r Eirh.. Looro.or Inr.9..t.Typ.
Example 10.9, What is the minimum required thickness of a welding neck
flange as shown in Fig. 10.lzla with the following design data? (Nore.' These data
are the same as those used for the blind flange in Example 10.8. In Fig. 10.15
is a sample calculation of a welding neck flange.
Solutinn
3. Gasket dirnensions are
I orrron coxorrronr
J7i.^l u."^L azl-1,
13.154 l;ber fi//el,s u/eer tt"el
'r= rl t5 t.o. i t" ",tt /e'
h= 6'at B= to.7t "
Io-:". I P;Pe s'ze
ra't L. tza I
ll
tr
c. 2t,5'
I Ac =,5lc -6r = t.1L
hT
t6- 7"' eot::s - rc =.5(c - cr - t71'65
Figure lO.l,C(d) Flons€ dim€Bions ior Ex. 10.9.
4. Determine bolt loadings and sizing of bolts with N = l; b = 0.3535; .s(s, + srfq .5 {sr + srl =
y= 10,000; m=3.0.
a, : :
XB'p !{ro.ts)'{zsn) = 226906 Figuro lo.l5 weldins neck flonse sdmple colculotion sheet (Courtesv G+w Tovlor-Bonnev Div
' Tovlor
Fors..)
-
He = Hp:250,591
Hr : H - Ho : 1444,3231 - Q26906) = 2r7,4r7
Leaer Arms
303
hp=R+'0.591 = (2.5) + 0.5(3.375) = 4.1875
Itll'lD flANOt!, COVIR p[Arr3, Al,tD frANOrs
IO.IO BOLTID FTANGED CONNECTIONS WITH RING-fiPE GASKITS 305
nr; - O..J(C * 6) = 0..5(22.5 - 15.043) : j12BS
Lon g itudinal H ub Stre s s
}r=0.5(R*g1 * ft6):0.5(2.5 + 3.375 + 3.7285) = 4.9613
Flange Moments
sx = fMn/ LglB : (t)(2,928,490) / (r.763)(3.37 ra(0.7 s)
sa: !3,s70 q9!
Mo = Hp x hD = (226,910)(4.1875) = g5g,17g
Radial Flange Stress
Mo- Hox hc= Q5O,5g0)(3.7285) : g34,33g
Mr = Hr x h, : (Zt7 ,420)(4.3018) = t,O43,gg} s^= Qte + r)Mo/LtzB = <z.uzaf,s:x:rrii;li:..763)(4.s),Oo.7s)
Ma" = Mo + Mc + Mr = 2,928,490 s" = lLsg-Q-pg
He = W: 700,800
= (2.29)(2,928,490) / (4. r, 00.7 5) - ( 1. 39X 1 5,590)
Sr = 9140 psi
Lever Arm
10. Allowable stresses
hc=0.5(C-G):3.7285 < 1.5Sy: (1.5X17,500) >-11,10 pC)
56 = 26,250
Flange Moment Sa < Sr: 17,500 > 15,590 psi
$ < Sy: 17,500 > 9140 psi I
Mon= He x ft6 = (700,800)(3.7285) : 2,612,930
7. Use the greater of Md. or M6"g1/S);
Ms
2,92g,490. =
Example 10. 10. What is the minimum required thickness of a ring flange with
E. q}11pe consrants from the ASME Code,
VI[-I,
the same design data as given in Exarnple 10.9? The inside diameter has been
A/B = Q6.s)/(ro.7s) = 2.16s.
Appendix 2: K: increased to fit over the outside of the shell to where,B = 12.75 in. The bolt
i,e..-i 7 i, "s"Ju'i uro-,,
r = 1.35 z = 1.3e y 2.2e ^F,-":" ii : : z.ii."*""^'
loadings and bolt size are the same as in Example 10.9. A sample calculation
sheet is shown in Figure 10.16.
sr/ go = 3.375/1.0 :3.275
Solution
h=Vrry'=V@jr1D=3.27s
h/lro = 6.2s/3.2t9 = 1.906 1. Calculate total flange moment for design condition.
hc = 0.5(C - G, = 0.5(22.5
= 3.729 in. - 15.043)
hr = 0.5(ho + hd = g.514.gr1 + 3.729) = 4.302 n.
Flange Moments
, :
': iE
M*Y _ (3.029,000x2.812)
= -1r21x1)@.n : 5'8e8 in r Fisurs 10.17 Rwer$ flonge looding ond dimen3ions.
308 IUND ftANoxs, covrR puTEs. aND rrANG[S
'lhis muy cuuse sorns ol the moments t0 be applietl in thc opposite direction liom
I Drt|ox coxofioxt
those loads on a regular flange. However, the analysis is the same after thc
5/rr/ Kai'ed {""e-
fi l. r "t"-"/-
"new" total moment is determined. Again, the moments arc determined for both 'a.tat,
{,t/el, t& ;ahs 4a/
the gasket seating condition and the operating condition. In Figure l0.lg is a /r.75't0 ' / ltde-
' -
sample calculation sheet of a reverse flange.
Additionally, a new term aa is introduced to convert some terms from reqular
flanges io reverse flanges; fra and K are redefined and based on the reverse fl-anse
inside diameter; and a new equation is added to calculate the tansential flanie
stress at the inside flange bore. IOAO I llwt lr|| l Or{t|.l
-
A special precaution is noted. When K < 2, results are faidy satisfactory; t.=J(C+i'-23-t)=
however, when I( > 2, the results become increasingly conservative. For this
fi*r- x.t - t81,1o -,r'r' - _ I,Orl,tq l
r.r
reason the ASME Code procedure is limited to where I< s2.
- zz 1q f. y't f
Derivation of the new equations for reverse flanges is similar to that for the
regular flange except shears and moments are applied at the outer edge of the ring
* - Z,trL'?V
flange where discontinuities occur between the flange ana *re truU. Wittr
K = A/B', the conversion term ca is determined for converting T, Il, and y to
T,, U,, alrd If, which is obtained as
r(5r+ s.)rJ(s' + e!)
= 816EO ?e\
r.ir. rta. 9r ( ! a') =? I't,|o'l rtl
"=*['.*.#*)
=
(1,0.24)
rr = r:-rj.jb.t r = 0.957
Substituting this expression into the regular equation for tangential shess I=.ch/d loatr.+ l),,P=
- Z5r
4sr +tn.t 3l +n= qt6rl
(10.2s)
r".9, rrg, sr t^r r') =
ff
t =./3r+ | = l.
Example 10.11. A reverse flange is joined to a regular ring_type joint flange
to form a reducing connection . The total bolt-up momint ls coitroiting
anA equit
to Ms = 2,613,W. The flange bore d, = 13.25 in.; the outside diameter
A = 26.5.n.; and the flange thickness r = 5 in. What is the tangential flange
stress at the hub and at the inside bore?
" _Mol,,
tr= zl.,z \j
*,zl+ - i\l* r*7i
t, = #*#f
tj.zJ\zJ) L
r.ut - fl(r*
4.14\ --/] :
]3 " s " o.r:r)l szzopsi
Fisurs 10.18 Rwerse flonse somple colculotion she€|. (Courtesy G+W Toylor-Bonney Div.. Toylor Forge.)
s+ = kly _zK'?(_t +
gof
B'f L (K, - l)i l
309
ll0 luND ftaNots, covln puTrs, AND ItANOES IO.I2 FUI.L.FACT GASKET FIANGE 3l I
_ 2,6t3.(xx)L +lx5
.(,.
r3.2s(25)
oa
L-'"
_ z(+Xl
#*itti
x
= I6'o5opsi r
Example 10.12. With the reverse flange given in Example 10.11, what is the
minimum required thickness based on an allowable flange stress of 17,500 psi?
Solutia3. The tangential flange stress at the flange bore of 16,050 psi is
controlling. Because / appears in several terms in a no;linear manner, the easiest
way to select the proper thickness is by nial and error. For the initial trial, use
a square relationship as follows:
16,050 17.500
--tl-: l1z- or t:48in.
The term ,\ is recalculated as 3.855. Using this, the .ti = 16,900 psi. By
successive recalculations, the approximately correct thickness is , : 4.6g in.
which gives Si: 17,500 psi. I
Pmhlcm
10.11 Using the details of the flange described in Example 10.11. what is the
minimum required thickness if the material of the flange is changed to one
with an allowable stress of 15,000 psi?
919 gp" ot flange that is frequently used but no design methods exist in the
is the flange using a full-face gasket, as shown in Fig. 10.19.
lfME "C:* is a sample calculation sheet. This type
Figure.10.20_ of flange is designed
according to the provisions of U-2(g) of the ASME Code, Sectiorivll, Division
l. This code paragraph permits using good engineering design for those con-
structions where no rules exist in the code. Although the analysis is similar to
l-l
_tA I
tonce$ or momcnt olTns lrom the bolt circle to the ccntroid of the annulus from
I oraa.. corDmoxt 2
the bolt circle to the outside diameter and from the bolt circle to the insidc
diameter. In solving for the distances, the angle is assumed to be small and F'tt - F'.e ,/1eturtL.f 'be. - |ltt=7 qrlE
thc z
arc lengths are evaluated as sfiaight lines. From Roarkr2 and using his 5 to9
termi-
nology, the basic equation is sA-rzt cv.l ro^0 aro fori calcul lo|t
rlj= 6tor + ti'.r
= l,tq,tqQ wd/s. d w-Jt= 17., n
^- =ebcL'of
)c.1b
tt,=26ra6r = | 18,q86 \^.2 t(.- z"Q tJte
N.A
^,= .+^,1t.= 706,t16
,=i(T#) (lO.26a)
I
lr
tlEoo
)qzoo
14
ftl trtD = t/tt.r1' =
Fi E=cnr/.=
reL
4 t r' 5 t1
1t,168
wr'=tt +lt.r+t|'r = 7At,1l3
w=tl
tr'at=r./:. ttc,= 94a, 4q6
Horvever, converting to the terminology used in the ASME Code and as I ltv ar
in Fig. 10.19a, the equation becomes
shown 5 it - r)trl. - 1,'t,o4\ r. - r+ .5r, - tl,t 1 Pt-,d6- tZt,r72
,tt-E-ED- 1L,17-4 |'-Jtr+.,+tEl - { Zt, & - rrir - l1{,,rO{
V. - ?t1,h.6
a-
A_C 6= !!:!E!-*9=- = 2.9915' (.
=bg.4Lgl= = r.oz?2'
(10.26b)
2
,.o=\a -l|.= LlAtSoa *" = h.L- = o. 11 f6 a.=8.t-t'= 1C4 tozL
b= (10.26c)
"^err,J 8 t:* 3nls3 CIICULllDOT-€4din, 6 x er,o sur rrcrort
*(#) (10.26d)
16!, |kb, ti = nJIEI
r.rErFEgr: Pb/f
r-r. tla 9=-.t/f -u.-
-
= 1tt 71 ?ta
t1,71o ?,1
?,95'
:-j.5(5r+ s.l'Jl3r +5'l q' ToL,?r
- L
-
hL (rO.26e) t/iDrrt 5trE$ al tolt oto.t '-i 0 t118
. -r.+l r l.:5
t calak+r = l.4IO
(10.27) -afi - t. ool l
,, (A-C'^)(U+Cl , -.tla - O,o.lo1
- 6(A + C) r -t+a - r,o1',
-=rL,rt - H?.l6
3r3
3I4 II.IND ?U\NO!S, COVER PTATTS, AND TIANOTS IO,I2 FUIL-FACE GASKET TIANGI 3I5
ln a similar munncr, the distance or moment &rnt k)w&rd the inside diameter
h1; .. (A - c)(u + c) (26.5 - 22.5t(2 x 26.5 + 22.5)
is determined as
6(C + A) 6(22.5 + 26.5\
C_B hb : 1.0272 in.
-0"=+('!:'\
5 \O + c /
(r0.26f)
Determine the gasket dimensions:
. C_B
a: (to.26s)
2 G= C - 2hc:22.5 - 2 x 2.5915 = 17.317 in.
, = .r(?*) . c-B\
t-44
(22.5-10.75)
(10.26h) =- = 2.93?5 in.
c-B n = Tc.p
4'4 = +,r7.317)r(3z})
: 75,368
Example_10.13. A welding-neck flange with the same geometry as that in Determine bolting requirements: A' is the greater of Wa/S"ot W^z/S.
Example.10.9 except for the thickness is used with a full-facJ gasket. The design A^ = 36.76 in.'z based on ffi
pressure is 320 psi and the "soft" gasket is vegetable fiber with m
= 1.75 and At = 36.8 in.'z based on 16-2-in. diameter bolts
y = 1100. What is the minimum required thickness?
W = 0.5(A^ + A) : s.5136.76 + 36.8)(19'200) = 706'176
Solution
Determine flange moments at operating condition.
l. Determine the lever arms of the inner and outer parts of the sasket:
Flange Loads
h',_ =
hahh (2.5915X1.0272) Answer: t,"q'd. = 2.19 in.
"o - ho + hb-- Q.915) + [onr) = 0'7356 in'
IO.I3 FTANGE CATCULATION SHEETS
Fhnge moment
Calculation sheets are included for the following types of flange design:
Mr: H6h'[ = (630,808X0.7356 = a6a,O22 Sheet 1. Welding neck flange with ring-type gasket
All flange geometry Sheet 2. Slip-on or lap-joint flange design with ring+ype gasket
constants are the same as in Example 10.9.
1 Calculate flange stresses. Assume flange thickness t = 2.03 in. This is Sheet 3. Ring flange with ring{ype gasket
set directly from the radial flange stress at the bolt circte which is Sheet 4. Reverse welding neck flange with ring-type gasket
Sheet 5. Slip-on flange with full-face gasket
sF=, M' 6(4u,022) Sheet 6. Welding neck flange with full-face gasket
" t"(rc - Nd)- (2.0j),(22.5t - 16 x 2)
SF = n,a@ psi < 17,500 psi allowable. stress IO.14 FLAT.FACE FTANGE WITH METAT.TO-METAL CONTACT
OUTSIDE OF THE BOIT CIRCLE'",'O,''
Inngitudinal Hub Stre ss
Rules for the design of flat-face flanges with metal-to-metal contact outside of
L= te+l
T
+a= 1.0021 +0.0407 = 1.0428 the bolt circle are given in Appendix Y of the ASME Code, VIII-I. The rules
are for circular, bolted flanged connections with identical and nonidentical pairs
\4e,022) of flanges. The pairs of flanges that are in metal-to-metal contact across the
Sr= whole face and the gasket load to compress the gasket are small. (see Fig. 10.21)
L'?n (1.0428X3.375f(10.7s)
The rules also apply to identical pairs of flanges with a metal spacer added at the
Sa = 3634 psi < 26,250 psi allowable stress outer edge between them.
torrD afto aorY calcut
'|or{S
It
ro/ro r llvar /lr|r rOAO l val - |rorlxl
^rr
3t8 3r9
tl0 ll.lND .ANO!s, COV!n p[AtES, AND trANOls
5 r tavl| atr
I iD=J(C+r,-2$-tJ=
ti=.5(c-G)
.Jlrb rEl E
+
^,=.r{.-F-
iiiiiiS,iiiidiii'fi iF,il,,i -""'!,iit,y,,,:,.^*,-,.". M.l
1."'.e
6 rxpt coxrr^'m l-t I "',i,:. rtttsS carculaiox-{rf, rolin, 6
L3,nfl;:r,,1*-;E;F- r{e, xu5, 5r =ti./I!r'
xAtD |lut t^cro$
at lt,
1, 5:t
Co"ur.d-
G.*.d_
O.r.
ili5.,-- 9 "?.::' ttr$t cllcutano|r- sdd.. ""+[+:!Ilr#rl t-
)-
.rub, g rr =+.a, r
Shs€i 3. ning flonga yrith ring-iypo golk€t. (Cou|.tosy G+W = Ircllo,r
Toylor_Bonney Div., To),lor Fo; ! rod,crae.,sr
= pn./lt l;-------=_+
r.^o fl!., S'= Ur=drU
^cfr/r' -Z',to.6rt.+n/R=
llji .la, +sa- rrs, + s,r =
r-, n,.. s" 1^l 11 = f, _
i::" i i,' ] = 7 trrls3 Forr ui,a ;^cort
x r_..
[v
|t--|r---T-
scribed in Section 10.9 is the additional pryi'nl
the two flanges. of ;fil;;;iliit;
contact | / h ]_-,_ ,__<.
't r 4'"F-
tt
To organize the calculations svsiemadcally, II
it is necessary to !ru!.
blies and to categorize each individual nann". -- "--veJqr !v classify assem_
r-bJ
il
+
C hs s ifcation o! As s e mb ly
--l,o l.-----r=
Cmptrd- D.h.-*----
aadl. <t_A: Chxr.d- N!ib.r=--
Class l. This is a pair of flanges that are identical except
for the gasket Sh€€l ,a. R€verc€ w€ldins n€* flonse wirh rins-fyp€ goskst. (Court$y c+W Toylor-Sonney Div., Tdytor
g'oove. Fors€.)
Class 2 . Ii consists of a pair of nonidentical
flanges where the inside diameter
of the reducing flange Jxceeds one_half the
U.it Ou."to*
Class 3- This is a flange combined with "i."f"
a flat head or a reducing flange where
the inside diameter is small and ao", oot
on"_tlif" fieiort ctcte
diameter. "*"""0-
321
I o8rox cDaa!|no{t 2. 3
Ir
li
Wn=fi+i!+fi'?=
IOAO : lavn rrr - |tot,Nt I TIVlt T
,r lA-Cll2A+Cl= tc-tlra+o=
""=-:rc+.i- -=-=iiT6-
h,i= l'.1"., -
322 323
321 II.INO FIANOIS, COVTR PTATES, AND FI"ANOTS
t0.15 sPHERtcattY orsHED covtRs
dished head and the flange ring. The flange thickness is set by the combination
of the circumferential ring stress and the tangential bending stress. Figure 10.22
shows the head geometry and the loading applied to the ring flange resulting
liom the reaction from the internal pressure against the dished head. It is derived
thus. Using the geometry in Fig. 10.22, the following is set:
adjacent side :
(10.30a)
cos B, =
adjacent side _\/L'''' - ( _ \/4L'1Err-=E
hypotenuse L' 2L'
Catagory of Flonges
9i*g.IV^
t. This is an integral flange or an optional flange calculated
as an
mtegral flange.
ca'gory 2.It consists of a loose-type flange with a hub that is
considercd to
add shength.
3. A.loose-type flange that is with or without a hub
:l"g.y
type calculated as a loose type
or an optional
where no credit is taken for the hub in any case.
W:H+Hc+Hc (r0.29)
A ( outeide dianeter)
'Ihe ASME.Code
contains special rules for designing spherically dished covers
flange. The formulas given in the code are approximate
I-tllI
DecauseTntnC,
tney do"ng
not take into account the discontinuity existing between the
Fisuru 10.22 Sphcricolly-dirhed covcr.
t26 .tND ttANO!!, COVIR puTrs, AND traNols
IO,I5 SPHERICATTY DISHED COVERS
Substituting l, = tr', cos B,; D = B; and , = (/ _ B)/2 in Eq. 10.30c, l)ividing by S and rearranging terms to form a quadratic,
-
-'
vM"
(10.32)
head, it would have to be examined for compressive buckling that might set the
thickness.
T2B
I€t
r = PBldt=E
8S(A - 8)
-^^ ,_ Mo(A + B)
(10.3s)
s8(A _ B)
Then
'r':pL
-n- -(25mV2l'sl
:2r,s" =lo'zolb '" _
(2s00x10.75)y'4f11.8 I tP-:-(l0l75f = o 54o
8(17,500x26.5 - 10.75)
Horizontal force = F' cos p1 = GO,24O)(0.972\ = 9950 lb If we assume T = 5.75 and M0 : 2,503,000,
Vertical force = F' sin Br = O0,'2,40)(.236) = ?A2O lb
r :32.8so =
Total horizontal force
:
= a(10.75)(9950) : 336,000 'ffi;ffi 31.467
I=32.850"?*i:# =ro4tl
Load furn
T = 0.52+0 * y'1g5a0t + (30'4lD = 6.081 in.
Moment
He = W. = 700,800 ho = 0.5(C - G) : 3.729 Mo = H6h6: 2,613,000
l'robhms NOMENCTATURT
10.13 A spherically dished flange with an outside diameter ofA = 36 in. and
: lndividual nomenclature is used throughout Chapter 10. It is usually noted near
an inside diameter ofB l8in. is subjected to a gasket seating momenr
of 3,500,000 in.lb. The allowable tensile stress of the flangi material to where used. The following list gives some of the general nomenclature.
is 15,000 psi. What is the minimum required thickness at the gasket
seating condition? A : outside diameter of flange (in.)
I = inside diameter of flange (in.)
Answer: t^n = 6.24 in.
C = diameter of bolt circle (in.)
10.14 For the flange in Problem 10. 13, what is the maximum allowable flanse E : weld joint efficiency
moment if the allowable tensile stress is increased to 17,500 psi and tie G : diameter of gasket reaction (in.)
flange thickness is set at 6.25 in. ?
1u' : gasket seating width (in.)
Answer: M51o* = 4,|O2,NO in. lbs./in. circumference N-6 = minimum gasket width (in.)
P = total load 0b)
R = spherical radius of gasket surface (in.)
S = allowable tensile stress (psi)
S. : allowable bolt stress, room temperature (psi)
56 : allowable bolt stress, design temperature (psi)
design pressure (psi)
REFERENCES
ASME Boiler atrd Pressure Veso€l Code, Section VIII, Division I, Pressure Vessels,
ANSVASME BPV-Vn-I, Amedcan Society of Me.hanical Engine€$, New Yo*, 1983.
ASME Boiler ard Pressure Vessel Code, S@ton I, Pover Boilcrs, ANSVASME BPV-I,
American Society of Mechadcal Engineers, New York, 1983.
Wate$, E. O., D. B. Wesstiom, D. B. Rossheim, and F. S. G. Williams, "Formulas for
Sft€sses in Bolted Flanged Connections," f/dns. ASME, vol. 59, 1931, pp. 16l-169.
Wate$, E. O., D, B, Rossheim, D. B, Wesstrom, aDd F. S. G. Wilham's, Development of
General Formulas for Bohed Flaryes, Taylor Forge atrd Pipe Works, Chicago, 1949.
Waters, E. O., and R. W. Schneider, "Derivation of ASME Code Formulas for lhe Design
of Reverse Flanges," WeldittS Research Council, Bulletin 262, October 1980, pp. 2-9.
ANSI Standard 816.5, "Pipe Flatrges and Flanged Fittings," American NatioMl Srzndards
hstitute. New York.
', API St ndard 605, lzrge Diametcr Carbon Stee, FrarSer, ANSVAPI Std. 605, Americatr
Petroleum ltrstitute, Washington, D,C.
ANSI Staftlard B16.24, 'Bronze Flanges ard Fittings, 150 aod 300 lb," America! National
Standatds Institute, New Yo*.
Rossheim, D, 8,, and A. R, C. Markl, "Gasket Irading Con$tants," Mechanical Eb
gi ceri g, Vol. 65, September 1943, W. 647-648.
Raut, H. D., and G. F. Iron, "Report of Oasket Factor Tests," Welding Research Council,
Bulleti! 233. New Yort. De.ember 1977,
11. Modern Flange Design, Bulleth 502, Tttt ed, , G aDd W Taylor-Bomey Division, Southfield,
Mich.
12. Roark, R. J,, FormnJas for Stress and Strain,3d ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1954.
13. Water$, E. O,, 'Dedvatior of Code Fordulas for Part B Flanges," WeUinB Research
Coun il, Bnlletin 166, October 1971, pp. n47.
14, Schneider, R. W., and E. O. Waters, "The Backgrcund of ASME Code Cas€ 1828: A
Simplified Metbod of Analyzing Part B Flanges," Tranr, ASME, Jounal of Presrure Vessel
Technology, Vol. 100, No. 2, Mt! 1978, pp. 215-219.
Schneide., R. W, and E, O, Wate$, "The Application of ASME Code Case 1828," Irarr,
ASME, lournal of Pressure Vewel Technology, Vol. 101, No. I, February 1979, pp.87-94,
CHAPTER ll
OPENINGS, NOZZLES, AND
EXTERNAL LOADINGS
334 335
336 OPENINGS, NOZZIES, AND EXTERNAI' LOADINOS
I I.I OENERAI,
Ml
f-
F^l
figura tl.l Applied Pras$rre ond externol loodings on noz-zle' FigurG ll.2 Voriotion in d/D rotio of nozzles ond piping.
OPININOS, NOZZICS, AND EXTERNAI TOADINOS I I.2 STRESS€S AND TOADINGS AT OPTNINOS
vcss€l parts or piping system are established. A slight change in the details at tho
intersection may enable the vessel to operate through many more cycles of
pressure and temperature loadings.
Detailed rules for designing vessels and piping to accommodale the primary
membrane stresses and loadings from intemal and external pressures are given
in codes and regulations such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codel
and the ASME Code for Pressure Piping B31.'z In addition, some design rulcs
are given in the more advanced sections of these codes to permit considering
shess intensity factors (SIF) and stress concentration factors (SCF) in deter-
mining peak stresses. The peak stresses are used to determine the design fatigue
life of the vessel. Other codes do not mention peak stresses or fatigue evaluations
and leave the latter as the designer's responsibility. At the present time, none of
these codes contains detailed design rules for the consideration of extemal
loadings from either dead loadings or piping expansion loadings.
Both single and multiple openings require calculations that show that the stresses
and loadings in the shell and head are kept within acceptable limits. Single
openings are calculated by the reinforcement method, whereas multiple open-
ings are calculated by either the reinforcement method or the ligament efficiency
method. In both cases, the primary stresses are effectively kept less than the
allowable stress by replacing the area removed for openings.
For a single circular opening in a flat plate with infinite boundaries in two
directions (not through the thickness) that is subjected to applied forces and
stresses along opposite edges of the plate, stresses are increased above the
nominal applied stress in the unperforated plate. The stresses decrease away
from the opening until the nominal stress in the plate is obtained. The ratio of
the stress at the examined point divided by the nominal stess is the stress
intensity factor.
The shess intensity around an opening may be expressed either in general
terms of applied stresses and geometry or in location of the considered point. The Figure ll.3 Two-direction'lood combinorio's on flot Plote with circ"ldr oPening'
intemal pressure-the basic equation for the stress intensity factor is found by
Tqble I I.l Streu Inlenally
combinine the effects of sfesses in two directions according to Eq. l I l:
Foctors for Vorious Rolios of
Applied Stress
cos 20 = + 1
", =ilo.
,(')' . ,(;)'] (l l.s)
r = radius of circular opening in plate (in.)
r: distance from centerline to point of SIF (in.) At the edge of the opening, the sffess intensity factor is determined from Eq'
1 1.2 assuming cr : or vnd 02 = 0.5or so that
For applied stress ratio of 1 : 0-the condition of an axial tension load
only-the basic equation for the stress intensity factor is obtained by solving Eq. c* = 3or -O.5or = 2.5oot (1 l.6)
1l.l with 0 = rl2 wherc cos 20 = -1, giving
Substituting various values of r for.r in Eq' 11.5, stress intensity factors at various
"' = Zl'. (;)l - i l' -''0']t-'r distances from the edge of the opening are
r
21
3.00sr
1.15ar
'=t*$' (l l.7)
At the edge of the opening, the stress intensity factor is determined from Eq' 1 I .2
3r l.Mo1
assuming that at = or dllrd cz: 6t as given by
4r l.O4o1
c*:3c1 - ar=200or (11.8)
For an applied stress ratio of 2 : l-the condition of a cylindrical shell under
oPlNrNoS, l{onfis, AND ExftRNAr toAD|NOS I I.3 THEOTY OF REINfORCID OPENINOS
Substituting vsrious vulucs ol'r li)r r in Lq. 11.7, stress intensity tactors at
I'roblems
dislances lrom the edge ol'the opening are
II .1 What is the stress intensity factors for a plate under a stress ratio of 2 : - I
for the vessel given in Example 1 1.1 at the edge of the opening and at
r 2.O0oy distances of 2r,3r, and 4r?
2r l.25or
Answeri Incat\on SIF
31 1.11o1
41 1.06s, r 3.50
21 1.2O
Exarnple 11,1 A vertical vessel under intemal pressure and dead load contains 31 1.05
an opening that is qubjected to applied stresses. The dead load stress is equal to 41 1.Oz
the circumferential pressure shess. For this stress condition, what is the basic
equation for the stress intensity factor at any location from the center of the 11.2 In the ASME Code, VIII-2, a local stress regionis one in which the stress
opening? intensity of 1.15, does not extend more than VRt In terms of the radius
of the oiening r, how far ftom the edge of the opening in-a hemispherical
head under iniernal pressure is required to have a stress of 1' 15. assuming
Solutian. The applied stress in the circumferential direction is o1, whereas in
the longitudinal direction it is the longitudinal pressure stress minus the longi- S^ = o1?
Tn
\,i:
.r!, \:;i*
T
Figt re I
From Fis.
L,4 ,{€lhods of odding r6inforc€msnt moteriol. (Court*y Arnericon Socisry
UM6.l of the ASr'tE Code, Vlll-l)
another problem such as high thermal stresses. Investigations by the pVRCa and
others indicate that the placement or location of the reinforcement is important.
of it€chonicol Engine€rc,
T
5
l
On most pressure vessels, the reinforcement is added to the outside as shown in
Fig. 11.5. However, on some vessels the reinforcement is added on the inside
as in Fig. 11.6; and on still others, some of the reinforcehent material may be
added !o both the outside and the inside as in Fig. 11.7. The best arrangement \tl.t
for reinforcement is the so-called balanced reinforcement which consists of
about 35-407o of the area on the inside and about ffi-C|Vo of the area on the
outsidg. On many designs, it is difficult to place any reinforcement on the inside Figur€ I1.6 R€infor.€ment odded to intid. of op€ning'
345
t.l6 OPININOS, NOZZTES, AND IXTIRNAI. I.OADINOS
I I.4 RTINFORCEMENT TIMITS
ular to the surt'ace of the shell. These are set at a point at which it is l'elt that the
added reinforcement within the limits is effectively helping to replace the metal
removed at the opening.
Tn
Two formulas are used for setting the limits measured from. the opening
c9!!er!!e3!91g.1@g!qg".jg@f, with--th" t-c*
offlre two inswEis used.
The first answer is equal to the diam6fer of the opening d. The second limit equal
tothesumof ?l + T^+ O.5d. AsshowninFig. 11.8, the thickness ofthe nozzle
wall usually determines which of the two limits controls. At a distance d from
the centerline without reinforcement added, Eq. 1 1.5 for a cylinder gives a SIF
of 1.23or and Eq. 11.7 for a sphere gives a SIF of 1.25 q.
With additional
\i,:'l reinforcement material, the nominal stress is reduced close to that in an un-
{.a \i-;.jl:i perforated plate.
If z nozzle is attached at the opening, it also offers reinforcement arca
T
available for replacing that area removed from the vessel at the opening.lU-
@iruegAUC!.d9l4bl9-lgled on the wave
I
damping length of a beam on an elastic foundation. For a cylindrical shell, this
length is a function of l/B, where B for a poisson's ratio of 0.3 is equal to
1.285 /Y rt .
either because it is not accessible or it interferes with flow or drainage. The _l\/, \/o.tv
balanced reinforcement is often used at manway and inspection openings where
- p r.285 1.285
= O.246r = 2.46t
no nozzle is attached.
For applications in design problems, where the reinforcement requirements For code application, the number was rounded off to 2.5 f. With the wide range
are established, the method of replacing areas is chosen rather than a method that of r/t ratios, which are currently used in process vessel construction, some of
balances loads or stresses . An area at the opening for carrying primary loads and the codes are setting this reinforcement limit in the vertical direction by
shesses is removed. Thus this required area must be replaced by another area
adjacent to the opening that is not used for that purpose. It is desirable to replace L= O.7S !r-I" ( 11.e)
that area required for primary loads by an adjacent reinforcement area. Within
the reinforcement limits, the reinforcement areas are assumed to have the same where L = reinforcement limit perpendicular to shell (in.)
load-carrying capabilities as the area removed for the opening. Consequently, /, = mean radius of nozzle opening in shell (in.)
when the reinforcement areas are equal to or exceed the required area, primary
stresses have been restored to as near the unperforated plate as possible. 4, : nominal thickness of nozzle (in.)
Each pressure vessel and piping code treats the calculation of the reinforce-
I I.4 REINFOR.CEMENT LIMITS
ment area somewhat differently and establishes both parallel and perpendicular
limits in different ways. A discussion of the reinforcement requirements for
As described in Section I 1.2 , the stress intensity factor for an opening in a shell several different codes follows.
or head is highest at the edge of the opening and decreases away from the
opening (based on a shell wall with constant thickness). When the effective
thickness is increased, as happens with added reinforcement material, the ever-
Example 11.3 A cylindrical pressure vessel that is 60-in. ID by 6-in. thick
contains a nozzle that is 12-in. ID by 3-in. thick. What is the stress intensity
age stresses are lowered. Limits of reinforcement are set parallel and perpendic-
factor at the reinforcing limit that is parallel to the surface of the vessel?
I r.4 RqNtoRctMENT tlMlrs
d:12in.
0r
11.4 If the new reinforcement limit in the vertical direction were based on
r/r = 5 instead of r/r = l0 that was used to obtain the present limit of
2.5T,, what is this multiplying factor in terms of T^ for r/t = 5?
Ans*ert The vertical limit is 1.74?1, based on the limit of r/t = 5'
11.5 For an allowable stress of 15,000 psi, what is the maximum design
pressure permitted for an rft = 5 based on the circumferential stress
formula given in the ASME Code, VtrI-l?
The rules for reinforced openings in ASME, Section l, Power Boikrs, permlt
using the replacement of both area and ligament efficiency provided certain
limits are met. Ligament rules may be used for repeating pattems of openings
provided the maximum diameter of any hole in the pattern does not exceed a
diameter determined from Fig. PG-32 of Section I. This figure is a plot of the
following equation with limiting values of K between 0.5 and 0.99:
Ti+Tn+o,td
a,,, =z.ts{WJr-x) (11.10)
Figur. I1.8 Reintorcomsnt limits porollsl to she'l sur{o.6. p= intemal design pressure of maximum allowable working pressure
(psi)
348
3IO OPTNINOS, NOZZTES, AND TXTERNAI. TOADINGS I I.4 RTINFORCEMENT TIMITS 35I
4nn" : msximum alkrwable diameter of opening (in.) 3. Except for hemispherical heads, formed heads have dlD
= 0.25 Bnd
d^* : 2-in. NPS, which is the same as for cylindrical shells.
D, = outside diameter of shell (in.) 4. For hemispherical heads, the actual center-to-center distance in item I is
fl = nominal thickness of shell (in.) met. The value of K is one-half the value of 1( as determined bv Eo.
11. 14.
S= allowable tensile stress (psi)
5. For formed heads, d,- of Eq. 11.10 is met.
For shelfs designed to PG-27.2.2.1 of Section I,
Size and. Shape of Openings
K:
- 1.6 s?iP?' (1 l. l1)
The shape of the opening when these rules are applicable is limited to circular,
elliptical, or obround where the ratio of the large-to-small dimension is < 2.0.
For shells designed to PG-27 .2.2 of Section I, When the ratio is ) 2.0, special requirements may be necessary to resist any
twisting moment. For shapes other than those above, a special analysis or proof
test is required.
r=
-- PD" (t|.r2)
1.82 St No limitations are set on the size of an opening by Section I rules. However,
the rules in the text are limited to the following sizes:
N o Reintorcement Re quhe d
l. For vessels 60 in. and less in diameler, the opening shall not exceed
The rules for openings in Section I contain proyisions for single openings when 0.5 D or 20 in.
no calculations are required to prove the adequacy of the shell. No calculations 2. For vessels over 60 in. in diameter, the opening shall not exceed 0.33 D
are needed for a cylindrical shell when either of the following is met: or 40 in.
l. d /D < O.25 arrd d^* = 2-in. NPS. When these sizes are exceeded, suggested rules place the available reinforcing
2. d* = maximum diameter using Fig. PG-32. area close to the opening.
For openings in forrned heads, no calculations are required to prove the ade-
quacy if all of the following are met: Required Area of Reinforcemenl
The total cross-sectional area of reinforcement required for any plane through the
1. Actual center-to-cenier distance between openings is less than I where
center of an opening is given by
A+B
L= 2(r (11.13) A = dt,F (r1.15)
+ K)
where d = diameter of opening (in.)
r = --!2:-
-- (1 1.14)
1.82 S?: t, = minimum required thickness of seamless shell (in.)
A and B : diameiers of adjacent openings (in.) f = 1.0 except that Fig. PG-33 may be used for integrally reinforced
openings, where permitted,
D, = outside diameter of formed head (in.)
F=0.5(cos'z0+l) (11.16)
{ = nominal thickness of formed head (in.)
Other terms are the same as for Eq. 1 1. 10. For torispherical heads when the opening and its reinforcement are within the
spherical part t, is the minimum required thickness for a hemispherical head
2. The edge of one opening is no closer than I to the edge of the adjacent when the radius is equal to that of the spherical part of the torispherical head.
opening. For a 2 : I ellipsoidal head when the opening and its reinforcement are within
352 OPININOS, NOZTLES, AND EXTERNAT I.OADINGS I I.4 REINFORCEMENT IIMITS 353
The limit of reinforcement parallel to the shell measured on each side of the
opening centerline is the greater of (1) / or (2) T, + T, + 0.5d.
If the thicknesses of the shell and nozzle are uniform and the reinforcement area
does not extend beyond this uniform thickness, the following formulas may be
used for determining the available area of reinforcement. However, if the open-
ing and its reinforcement extend into areas with different nominal thicknesses Figorc tt.9 binfo.cing requirom6nb for mlltiple oPnings. (courles), Americdn so.i6tv of r{e.honicdl
and different minimum required thicknesses, these formulas are not applicable. Ensin€€rs, Froh fig. PG-38 of the ASME Code, S€crion l)
When two or more openings are spaced so that theil limits of reinforcement
1. Minimum required thickness of shell at E : 0.95 is
overlap, the combined area is used and counted only once. The spacing between
any two openings is to be not less than 1.33 4". For a series of openings in a x 33
PR 2875
pattern, the area between any two openings equals 0.7f' of the area obtained by ' sE - 0.6p 16.800 x 0.95 - 0.6 x 2875 .- -
multiplying the center-to-center distance by the required thickness as shown in
Fie. 11.9. use 6i in. plate
I I.4 RIINFORCEMENT I.IMITS 355
--
b EX
The only single openings are 5 in. and 6{ in.;others are not considered
T^
single. Consequendy, all nozzles have the reinforcement area calculated
x x (see Table 11.2).
2X 6. All nozzles except the 24-in. ID nozzle are "set-on" type and calculated
together.
A B( D=LIMIT OF REINFORCEMENT 7 Reinforcement area required by Eq. 11.15 is
K'- = 0'99 Area available is greater than atea requied and values of 4 that were assumed arc correct.
354
116 OPININOS, NOIZI.Is. AND EXTERNAT IOADINOS I I,4 REINIORCEMENT IIMITS 357
18. Area available in r:r.rrzzle wall; wall extends inward for 6j in. as full
reinforcing limit oulward:
20. Also, check 'tlose-in" limit. Determine limit parallel io shell as the
greater of
Because the parallellimit is the same for the "close-in" limit, the area
required of 0.674, is also satisfied without further calculations. I
4. Exnminc thc longitudinal plane l-2. Actual spacing = 4.5 in. parallcl ll.7 For triangular anangement of openings shown in Fig. I l.l I with oPen-
limits without overlap = 2x = :
2(2.438) 4.875 in., exceeds actual ings that are 2.25-in.lD, what is the minimum side length of a spacing
spacing. Therefore, limits ovedap and special rules apply. that forms a series of equilateral triangles?
A,= dt,F = (2.2s)(0.552)(1.0) = 1.242in.2 Ans#sr.' Minimum lensth of side is 4.631 in.
Az - t^)(2Y) : (0.188 -
= (7, 0.035)(2 x 0.469) : 0.143 in., The rules for reinforced openings in ASME Section VIII, Division 1, Pressure
A' = A1 t Az = 1.432 in.z Vessek, arc similar to those for ASME Section L However, the rules for
reinforcernent are given as the main choice, with ligament rules used only as an
Asa = (0.552)(4.5X0.7 x 1.0) = 1.739 in.2 alt€rnative for repeating pattems of openings. Rules iue contained in both the
iext and the appendices. They are given for both internal pressure and extemal
A561s: (l.125)(4.5 - 2.25') = 2.531 n.2 > 1.739 in.2
pressure. The rules are essentially the same except that only 50% of the replace-
5. Examine the diagonal plane, 2-3. With a row-to-row spacing of 3 in. and ment area is required for extemal pressure assuming that the minimum required
thickness in each case is based on the appropriate formula and design rules for
a longitudinal spacing of 4.5 in., the diagonal spacing is + \,tr ZB
: 3.75in.,0 = tan-' 3/2.25.0 = 53.13.. With a spacing of 3.75in., both intemal and extemal pressures.
the parallel limit of 4.875 in. exceeds the actual spacing; therefore, the
limits overlap and the special rules apply. From Eq. 11.16, N o Reintorcement Re quiNed
F:0.5(cos2 0 + l) = 0.68 for g = 53.t3'.
Single openings in vessels that are not subjected to special applied loadings, such
A, = dt,F : (2.2s)(0.ss2)(0.68) = 6.30r
.n.,
as cyclic loading, do not require reinforcement calculations if the openings do
Ar = (4 not exceed the following size limits.
- r'r,)(spacing - d) = (1.125 - 0.68 x 0.552)
(3.75 - 2.25) = 1.124 in.2 1. In plate thickness of $in. or less, d,,. = 3-in. NPS.
A: = 0.143 in.'z 2. In plate thickness greater than;i"., d* = 2-in. NPS.
A, = A1 ! Az = 1.267 in.2 > 0.845 in.2
Size anl Shape of Openings
A14a: (0,552)(3.7 5)(O.7 x 0.68) : 0.985 in.,
The nrles apply to openings that are circular, elliptical, or obround. The latter
4567s = 0.125)(3.75 - 2.25) = 1.688.in., > 0.985 in.,
shapes often result from an opening in a curved surface or from a nonradial
6. The assumed values of T, = 1.125 in. and ?i = 0.188 in. are satis- nozzle. However, other shapes arc permitted when considered according to
factory. I u-2(e).
For openings in cylindrical shells, the rules in the text are limited to openings
Problzms of the following size limits:
11.6 What is the minimum required wall thickness (rounded uo to the next 1. For shells 60-in. and less in diameter, the opening is not to exceed 0'5 D
l/8 in.) of a t2 3/4-in. ID nozzle atrached to a 60-in. by 3.75-in. or 20 in.,
d
thick drum? The allowable stess of both the shell and nozzle material is 2. For shells over 60 in. in diameter, the opening is not to exceed 0.33 D
15.0 ksi. The nozzle is attached by a full penetration weld with comer or 210-in.
fillet welds with a throat of 0.7 ?i. The design pressure if 1400 psi at room
@mperature. When these size limits are exceeded, in addition to the rules in tle text, the rules
in Appendix l-7 are also to be met. These additional rules may require some
Answer: t-in = 2.50 in. reinforcement to be placed closer to the opening than required by the rules in the
360 oP!N|NOS, NOZZUS, AND CXTEnNAL tOADINOS II ,4 RETNIORCEMINT TIMITS 361
text. l.'tlr opcnings in sphcrical shells and lbrmed heads, the text rures are mer
by considering the use of reverse curves and conical sections where possible.
There are no specific limitations on size and shape of openings in spherical shells
and formed heads.
The total cross-sectional area of reinforcement required for any plane through the
center of an opening is given by
A: dt,F (ll.2l)
where d = the diameter of the opening on the longitudinal plane of a
cylindrical shell or any plane of a spherical shell or formed head
(in.)
F : conection factor for pressure stress on plane being examined with
respect to longitudinal axis, as shown in Fig. 11.12. This factor is
applicable only to nozzles with integral reinforcement,
t, = minimum requked thickness of a seamless shell based on the
circumferential stress (longitudinal plane) or of a seamless formed
head with the following additional provisions:
1 When the opening and its reinforcement are totally within the spherical
part of a torispherical head, l. is determined using the hemispherical head
formula with both E and M = 1.0 (see Fig. t1.l3a).
2. When the opening and its reinforcement are in a cone, r, is the required
thickness of a seamless cone.
3. When the opening and its reinforcement are in an ellipsoidal head and
o" r;o 2oo so" aoo loo coo loo loo
Atb
eoP
Arrelr ol Pt.na wlih Loneitldltral
within a circle that is equal to 8070 of the shell diameter, r, is determined Fisur€Il.l2 Charr tor der€rmins F. (Courreiy Amsricon Socistv of l'lechonicol Ensine€rs, From Fis UG-37
using the hemispherical head formula for a seamless shell of radius K1 D , of d's ASME Code, Vlll-l .)
where D is the shell diameter and K1 is obtained.from Table 1 1 . 3 and as
shown in Fig. 11.130.
Limit o! Reinforcement Perpendicular to Shell
The value of t, obtained from any of the methods given above is used only
to determine the required area of reinforcement. The value of t" used to set the The limit of reinforcement p€rpendicular or normal to the shell measured either
minimum required thickness of the shell or head is based on the thickness inward or outward from the surface of the shell is the smaller of (1) 2.57' or (2'S
fbrmulas that consider all the design loadings and weld joint efficiencies. 2.5n+ L.
When the size of tle opening is within the limits in the text, the limits of When the reinforcement limits do not extend outside the zone of nominal wall
reintbrcement parallel to the shell surface measured on each side of the center- thickness of the shell and nozzle, the area available for reinforcement may be
line are the larger of (l) d or (2) T" + Tn + 0.5d. calculated by the following formulas:
t62 OPININO!, NO! T!3, AND TXTIRNAT TOADINGS I I.4 REINTORCTMENT TIMITS
Tqble I 1.3'
The limit of reinforcement parallel to the shell measured on each side of the
opening centerline is the greater of (1) 0.75 d or (2) T, + T, + 0.5d.
The limit is set exactly the same way as for a nozzle that is within the rules of
(b) Limits for Etlipsoidaf Head
the text.
Figt r€ I L I 3 Dorerminorion of sp€ciol limirs ior determing t, to u!€ in roinfior€€rnenr colculations. Wlen any two adjacent openings are spaced so that their reinforcement
overlaps, the combined area is used, but is evaluated only once in the combined
area. The preferred spacing is at least 1.5d"", with 507o of the area required
between the two openings.
1. Area available in shell wall is the greater of
Example 11.6. Determine the reinforcement requirements of an 8 in. 1D
nozzle that is centrally located in a 2 : 1 ellipsoidal head. The inside diameter
41 =(2"d._d)(ET,_Ft) (11.22) of the head skirt is 41.75 in. The allowable shess of both the head and nozzle
or material is 17.5 ksi. The design pressure is 700 psi and the design temperature
is 500'F. There is no corrosion and the weld joint efficiency is E : 1.0. See Fig.
tu = 2(7" + T^ + 0.5 d) - d(ET, - Ft,) (r1.23) 11. 13. 1 for details of a nozzle.
l. The minimum required thickness of aZ: I ellipsoidal head without an A,: A1 'r Az: 1.960 + 4'805 : 6 765 in''
opening is determined from UG-32(d) of the A3ME Code, VIII-I as
Area provided = 6.765 in.z > area required = 6.040 in.'? If additional
PD 7oo (41'751 area is needed, use fillet weld area. I
zSE =-
- 0.2P= 2(17,sn x 1.0) - 0.2(700)
= 0.838 in.;
use 1.0 in. Example 11.7. Determine the reinforcement requirements for a l2-in.
x 16-in. manway opening. The l2-in. dimension lies along the longitudinal axis
t As noied in the definition of r, ro use with Eq. 11.20 and shown in Fig. of the cylindrical shell. The manway cover seals against the outside surface of
11.13.1, when an opening and its reinforcement are located in an ellio_ the opening so that the opening nozzle is under intemal pressure' The ID of the
soidal head and within a circle equal to 80Zo of the shell diameter, ,. to shell is 41.875 in. Both the shell and manway material have an allowable tensile
be used in reinforcement calculations is the thickness required for a stress of 17,500 psi. The design pressure is 700 psi at a design temperature of
seamless sphere of radius K1D, where D is the shell ID and E for a 2 : I 500'F. There is no corrosion and the joint efficiency is E = 1.0' Details are
ellipsoidal head is 0.9 frorn Table 11.3. For this head, the opening and shown in Fig. 11.14.
reinforcement are within 0.8 D = 0.8(41.75) = 33.4 in.
3. Using the spherical shell radius of R = K tD = 0.9(41.7 5) = 37 .57 5 n. Solution
in the hemispherical head formula gives
1. The minimum rcquired thickness of the shell is found from
!' = = PR = -
PR 7oo (37.575)
= u. /f)
2SE - 0.2p x _ rn. 700 (20.938)
2(17,500 1.0) 0.2(700)
-t=-=sE -PR0.6P (17,500 x 1.0) - (0.6 x
":'::-
700)
= 0.858 in.:
4. The minimum required thickness of the nozzle is use 1 ln.
,^= PR' 7OO (4) 2. The minimum required thickness of the nozzle is obtained as
'- sE - 0_6P = (17,500
x 1.0) - 0.6(700)
= 0.164 in.
700 (6)
!. Limits paraUel to head surface = X = d or (T, + T, + r), whichever rs ', : --!lo-
sE - o.6P
= (17,500 x 1.0)
- (0.6 x 700)
= 0.246 in.:
larger. X = 8 in. or (4 + | + t.125 = 6.125 in.); use 8 in. use 1 i in.
6. Lirnits perpendicular to head surface i s y = 2.57, or 2.52,, whichever rs
smaller. y = 2.5(1) = 2.5 in. or 2.5(1.125) = 2.813 in.; use 2.5 in.
,|
Because the limit of 2X = 2(8): 16 in. is less ihan 33.4 in. of item 2
above, the provision of the spherical head may be used.
E. Reinforcement area required following Eq. 11.20 is
3. Uxuntinution ol thc longitudinal planc where t' = | .0 is determined tiom is 70O psi at a design temperature of 500'F. All joints are fully radiographed with
Fig. l l.12. t joint efficiency of E : 1.0. There is no corrosion.
Limits parallel to shell, whichever is larger:
Solutinn
d: 12 in.
+ T, + 0.5d : 6+ 1. The minimum required thickness of the cylindrical shell from Example
T, 1 + 1* = S+in. 11.7 is
Limits perpendicular to shell, whichever is smaller:
t= 0.858 in.: usel in.
2iT, = 2.5(r) = 2.5 in. 2. The minimum required thickness of the head is
2+r": z.s(1.25) = 3.125 in.
PL 700 x 20.938
O.zP 2x x 1- = 0.420 in.;
Reinforcement area required by Eq. 11.20 is zSE - 17,500 0.2 x 7W
A,: dt,F : use I in.
12 (0.858X1.0) = 10.296 in.2
Reinforcement area available in shell by Eq. 11.21 is 3. The minimum reouired thickness of the nozzle is
At = 57,(7, - t,,) = S(t)(1.2s - 0.246) = 5.020 in., 4. Limits parallel to vessel surface, whichever is the larger of
Azz = 57,(7, - t^) = 5(1)(1.2s - 0) = 6.256 ;n.z
d. = 6in.
Total reinforcement area available:
or
At = At + A^ + An = 1.704 + 5.020 + 6.25O-_ 12.974 in.2 T, + T, + 0.5d= I + 0.75 + 3 = 4.75in.; use6in.
Area provided of 12.974 in.2 ) area required of 10.296 in.2 5. Limits perpendicular to vessel surface, whichever is the smaller of
4. Examination of circumferential plane where F = 0.5 from Fig. 11.12
gives the reinforcement area required by Eq. 11.20 as 2.5T, = 2.5(1\ = 2.5 in.
or
A,: dt,F = 16 (0.858)(0.s) : 6.864 in.2
2.5f": 2.519.'lt, = l'875 in.; use 1.875 in.
If the arc length of l6.4in. is used,A, = 7.036 in., Either of these areas
is less than A. in item 3 and does not control. The longitudinal plane 6. Reinforcement area requhed by Eq. 11.20 is
conhols. I
A, = dt,F = 6(0.858X1.0) = 5.148 in.'z
Example 11.8. Determine the reinforcement requirements for a 6-in.
ID noz_ ,1
Reinforcement area available in shell and head by Eq. 11.21 is
zle that is located at the junction of a cylindrical shell and a hemispherical
head.
The entire opening is in the cylindrical shell, but ttre reinforcemlni
extends in
Dotn drectlons-some into the head and some into the shell.
The ID of the shell
At = (ET" - - 0.8s8X6 - 3) = 0.852 in.'?
Ft,, = (1
is 41.875 in. The allowable shess of all material is 17.5 ksi. The design pressure Arz = (ETt, - Fil = (l - 0.420X6 - 3) = 1.740 in.2
3e0 oPlNlNos, NOZZ|tS. AND TXTEnNAT TOAD|NGS I 1.4 REINFORCIMINT LlMlTs 369
A: dt,F (1r.27)
I 1.4.3 Reinforcement Rules for ASME, Section Vlll, Division 2
where t, = minimum required thickness by either internal or external pressure
The rules for reinforced openings in Section VtrI, Division 2, are similar to those rules, as aPPlicable, (in.)
for Division 1 ; but there are some differences . Reinforcement limits and spacing F = factor depending upon the plane under consideration' 1 0 for
are based on the damping length of a beam on an elastic foundation. The rules formed heads and on the longitudinal plane' For nonintegral
are for either intemal or external pressure with no specific rules given for connections, F = 1.0 for all Planes'
extemal loadings or for fatigue. However, there are stress inlensity factors that
can be combined with the intemal pressure stresses to indicate the peak stresses
One-half of the required area of reinforcement is placed on each side of an
for fatieue. opemng.
T7O OPlNINO8, NOZZ!Is, AND IXTERNAI" I,OADINGS
371
OPININOS, NOZZTES. AND EXTIRNAI IOADINOS I I.4 REINFORCEMENT TIMITS 373
{.1
Fisurc ll.t6 Limits of reintorcine zone. (Courrely Amgrkon Sociory of rnechonicot Ensine€rs: From Fis. Figuro I I . I 7 Nozzlo d6tqil. 60r u3€ of olr€rnorive rul€t. (Courl$v Arnericon Soci€ry of tn€chonicol Engineers'
560.,{-l of the ASME Code, V t-2.} From Fig. AD-560.IJ of {'s ASME Code. Vlll2.)
375
116 OPININOS, NOZZTES, AND EXTERNAT IOADINOS
I I.4 REIN'ORCEMENT I.IMITS 377
Az = 2Y(7" - t^) = 2(2.s)(r.rz5 - 0.132) : 4.965 in.2 X= d or (f, + f, + r), whichever is larger
X= l}in. or (6+ 1+ 1.25) = 8.25 in.; useX = 12in'
8. Total reinforcement available form head and nozzle within 1007o rein-
forcement limit is (b) For two-thirds of required reinforcement area,
A, = Ar r,4z = 1.688 + 4.965 = 6.654 in.'? > 6.312 \n.2 X' = r 4 0.5\/R"t or (2, + I" + r) whichever is larger
9. Reinforcement available with two-thtds limit is x' = 6 + 0.5\Cl.438XD = 8.315 in. or 8.25 in.; use
= 1.3O2 in.2
10. Total reinforcement available from head and nozzle usins two-thirds
limit is
(c) For limits normal to shell surface, the larger of 5. In examining the circumferential plane, reinforcement area required ac-
cording to the ASME Code, VIII-2 is
y=05\/VJ+x or
A,: dt,F : 16 x 0.858 x 0.5 = 6.864 in.2
Y = 1.73x +
+ K Z.ST, and, < L + Z.Stp
=2.5te
y = 0.5\/6.625 x l2s + 0.25 = L698 in. or Using the arc length of 16.4 in., A. = 7.036 in.']Either of thetwo areas
is less than 4, in item 4d and do not control. Longitudinal controls. I
Y : 0 + 2.5(1.25) + 0.25 = 3.375 <
2.5(l) = 2.5 in. and < 3 + 2.5(1.25) = 6.125 in. Problem
A, = A1 * Ar + A:z= 3.2& + 4.872 + 5.912 = 14.048 in., No calculations for reinforcement are required when the following limits
are met:
At = 14.M8 > A, = 8.834 in.,
The lotal cross-sectional area of reinforcement required for any plane through the
center of an opening is given by
A, = l.o1t*dl (1 1.30)
Ar=(2dz-d)(7,*t,,t)
t, I
. zl(n - t'h)
(11.31)
T;
A1 ---------1-- (rr.32)
A3
=
= area
sm(I
of fillet welds
-T
Aa : arca of reinforcing rings, pads, and so on.
A5 = area of saddles
i a Ar.! A3 - rilld *ld dll't
F.di6d 6lnro6m..t.r!.
Reinlorcement Zone N^N jml[mt a& A4 - ncor In rin!, prd. or Ini.s.l
N' a6. at -.rc6wdl l. h.!d. dinro,c.d.nr tNol! {2ll
br.nch l@' ar. 45 - m'ttt in td'!t doc tun
f Au A2 -.rcF wttl in
The limits of reinforcement are formed by a parallelogram with sides of d2 on B3l l (Coud$v Americon Soci€tv of rn€chonicol
fislr6 I I .20 Dim€nlions ond not'otions for ANSI/ASME
each side of the nozzle centerline and an altitude of Z perpendicular to the shell
Ensinosru, From Fis. 1O'1.3.1D of ASMBANSI B3l'l )
surface.
2. Try to limit centerline spacing to 1 54" with at least 50% of area
The total cross-sectional area of reinforcement re4uired for any plane tbrough the
center of an opening is given bY
A, = l.olt*dr (11.30)
The total area available for reinforcement is the sum ofAl + A2 + & + +
45 where each area is determined as follows:
At=Qlz-d)(T"-t*)
^
(11.31) ;rI
t,
. zL\T, - t*)
Ar- = -_---:--
A3
sln a
surl'rce.
2. Try to limit centerline spacing to l 54" with at least 5070 of area
between opemngs.
Mulliple Openings
a design
Thc folkrwing should be aPPlied:
Example 11.11 A steam Plpe has a 24-in' inside diameter with
psi stress of 14,500 psi at the design tem-
-"r.ui" of 2500 and an-ailowable
an angle of
l. Ovcrlapping area shall be counted only one time' ;;;;;.; ;;-.fi pipe with an inside diameter of 8 in' connects at
?82 OPININOS, NOZZITS, AND EXTERNAI. TOADINGS I I.4 REINFORCEMENT IIMITS 383
Shell requirement: 24-:lr.. ID x 2.5 in. thick l+ : vertical limit perpendicular to header surface (in')
Nozzle requirement: 8-in. ID x 2.0 in. thick F: acute angle at intersection (degrees)
Fillet weld requirements: 2 with 0.5 in. legs required thickness of header (in.)
,,, =
I L4 RllNrgRcltllllr I Llmlrt
. thd(z - sin B)
ar: (11.34)
-----T-
\,
3 The horizontal limits on each side of the centerline
of the
E Horizontal Limits.
nozzle is the larger of
t2 '6- 1
6!l ic d1 or T1+4+05dI
t;- I
i.- I
12
ie: I
l. Determine actual and minimum required sizes at the branch run inter- Ar = 2(1.095)(0.438 - 0.194) = 0.534 in '
section as follows:
In fillet welds:
4= (0.s93)(0.875) = 0.519 in.
Ao = 2(r()2: 0.063 in.2
{, = (0.s00)(0.875) : 0.438 in.
th: PD/2(SE + py) = (600 x 20)/2(13,100 + 0.4 x 600) Excess area in Azr Az + Ao = 1.939 in'2 This is less than '4r; con-
sequently, a pad shall be provided. Determine the thickness of pad based
= 0.450 in. on the pid extending to the horizontal limits of reilforcement'
b= Pd/2(SE + PY): (600 x 8.625)/2(13,100 + 0.4 x 600) Il
(7.r25)H = 3.206 - 1.089; = 0.297 in.
= 0.194 in.
Assuming f, = 5116 in. determine minimum pad width'
Fillet weld size is the lesser of 0.7?i or i in.;
0.7(0.438)
(2w - 7'r2s)(0'3125) = 2'117
= 0.306 in.; use fillet weld,ir" = | in.
W = 6.95 in. Use 14 in. x 5/ 16 in. pad.
2. Determine the horizontal limits of reinforcement from the following,
whichever is the greater: 45 = (14 - 7.125X0.3125) = 2 148in2
d1 = (8 - 2 x 438)/sin 90" = 7.125_in. opening size Available area of reinforcement in A2 + A3 + A4 + As = 3 '237 in''
dz = (0.519) + (0.433) + 0.5(7.125) : 4.519 in. or This is greater than A1 and therefore is satisfactory'
d2 = it : 7.125 in.; use d, : 7.125 in. It may be possible to obtain more refinement and a thinner or narrower plate by
reevaiuating the vertical limits by setting T,
: 0 312 in and by including the
3. Determine the vertical limits outer fillet;elds if they lie within the horizontal reinforcement limits' This
of reinforcement from the following, recalculation may reduce the pad thickness and/or the pad width However, a
whichever is less:
14-in. by 5/16-in. pad is satisfactory. I
L4 : 2.5(0.519) = 1.298 in. Problem
or 11,12 For the construction in Example 11 . 12, what is the maximum allowable
working pressure when the allowable stress is increased to l8'8 ksi?
Lq = 2.5(0.438) +0: 1.095 in.; use Za = 1.095 in,
Ansper.' MAWP = 880 Psi
4. Determine the reinforcing area required according to Eq. 11.33 as fol_
lows: I 1.5 Ligomenf Efficiency of Openings in Shells
cos2 0 + I
(11.37)
ligoment el'licienoy method considers the loarJ-carrying ability of the area bc- intensity of tension on any plane
tween two points in relationship to the load-carrying ability of the ligament
reTltlilg when the two points become the centers of two openings. In thc : sin d cos d
intensity of shear on any plane ( l 1.38)
ASME Code, only the shell plate is considered; however, Lloyd;s Rulis6 permit
some help from integrally attached nozzles.
The basic method of diagonal ligament efficiency for application in thc total rension _ cos, g + l(p,4) (11.39)
ASME Code was developed in 1915 by Black and Jones oiihe Babcock & z
Wilcox Company, which was published in 1920 in the Marine Engineer's A. ,-,
sin A cos
Handbook.T ln 1975. a limit design analysis was used to examine suesses ln a rotaf shear: *\p'T,) ( 11.40)
perforated cylindrical shell.8 This limit analysis was further developed for
ASME Code application and used to update the original code rules. The rules
and curves are still given in several sections of the ASME Code and several The stress factor for tension for any section of the ligament is obtained by
foreign codes that determine the ligament efficiency used in the cylindrical shell dividing the total tension by the cross-sectional area of the ligament. The shess
formulas. factor for bending for any section of the ligament is obtained by dividing the
The ligament efficiency curves apply only to cylindrical pressure vessels bending moment of the section by the modulus of the section. The bending
where the circumferential lension (stress) has twice the inbnsity of the longi- moment is the product of the total shear multiplied by the distance between the
tudinal tension (stress). Once this was established, Rankine's Eilipse of Streis section considered and the point of contraflexure, which is the plane passing
was used to determine the iniensity of lension and of shear on any diagonal through the centers of the openings. The distance is Y in Fig. 11 22'
ligament. This is shown in Fig. 11.22. The total tension and the total shear are
ottained by multiplying the intensity of tension and of shear, respectively, by length of ligament : L = P' - \/F=4 (11.41)
the diagonal pitch between openings and by the shell thickness, as ixpressed by (rr.42)
bending moment = (6161 shear)(I)
the following equations:
cos20+ 1 (p'T,\
"'^ 2 lp'-\/d2-4Y'z)T,
(11.44)
Undcr the sponsorship of the Pressure Vessel Research Committee, an exten- The lowest factor is used to calculate the minimum efficiency for the angle 0
sive limit design analysis of perforated cylindrical shells with uniform patterns being examined.
ofopenings was completed. This limit design analysis was used to determine the
upper and lower bounds of limit pressure. A 2 : 1 ratio of stress field was
considered and the shell plate curvature was not included. From this analysis, efficiency : -l- = O'437 : 43 7vo
2.29
the basic lower bound equation was develooed into
Examplell,l3. Determine the minimum required thickness of the shell given
I + cos2, - d/P\4 +-5io?n in Example 11.5 using the ligament efficiency rules.
PLqb = 2 (11.46)
1+3cos20
Solution
For application in the ASME Code, the equation was rearranged so that the
diagonal efficiency term was expressed as p' /d, a number equal to or greater 1. Determine the longitudinal efficiency based on the longitudinal spacing
than 1.0, and the efficiency was expressed as a whole number. The equation for of 4.5 in.:
code use is
I'= A\-2)5
E=r ^'- -:::------:j::: O {0f)
/"-^ a\ p' 4.5
sec2 o + I - I "':;YI\A + sd2-7
-'- \P /d|
0.015 + 0.005 sec2 0
(1r.47) 2. Determine the equivalent longitudinal efficiency from the diagonal effi-
ciency using Eq. 11.47 as follows:
ll.l4 ln Problem ll.l3, what is the circumt'erential spacing for the samc
where R = inside radius of shell or head (in)
conliguration'l r = inside radius of nozzle (in)
Answer: The circumferential spacing is 3.108 in. 4 = nominal thickness of shell or head (in)
D. : mean radius of shell or head (in) = 2q * t
P = intemal design pressure or pressure range (psi)
I I.6 FATIGUE EVALUATION OF NOZTES UNDER INTERNAL
PRESSURE I : stress index for various locations (see Table 11'5)
o, = normal stress in plane being examined (psi)
When a fatigue evaluation is required, it is necessary to determine the peak
stesses around the openings. The current methods are the stress index method, or = tangential stress in plane being examined (psi)
experimental 0ests and measurements, or a theoretical analysis procedure such o, = radial stress in plane being examined (psi)
as a finite element analysis. The stress index method is the easiest method and
is allowed by the ASME Code, III-1 and VIII-2. The stress index method was 11.14. A cylindrical shell that is 36-in ID by 2'5-in' thick contains
Example
developed from reviewing a large amount of experimental and analytical data that is 4-in. ID by 0 75-in thick' The design pressure is
a perpindicutar nozzle
determined in a program conducted by the Pressure Vessel Research Committee .
td00psi at a design temperature of 450'F. The vessel is subjected to cyclic
The stress index method pennits easy calculation of peak stresses at the analysis is requircd' Peak stresses and- str-ess concen-
operation and a faiigue
nozzle-shell or nozzle-head intersection without resorting to any complex anal- noi known for the specific geometry to be used' What method
dation factors are
ysis. The stress index method gives conservative results; and if the exact multi- peak stresses for a fatigue analysis?
can be used to evaluate the
pliers for a specific geometry are known, they should be used. Essentially, the
nominal stress in the shell or head is multiplied by the stress indices and the peak
Solutian. At the intersection of the nozzle to the shell, peak stresses are
shesses are obtained.
obtained according to Eq' 11.48. The nominal stress is determined
as
The peak stresses are determined from the following equations where the
shess index I is multiplied times the nominal shess. PD^ + 2.5)
_ : _ 1900(36
= 14.630 psi
For spherical shells and formed heads: " 2T, 2(2'5)
.PD. (11.48) The peak stresses are determined as follows using the factorc for stress
index I
from Table 1 1.5:
For cylindrical shells: Longitudinal Plane Transverse Plane
must be
These values are the peak stresses due to intemal pressure only and
Cylindrical Shells
Spherical Shells and on the shell for
Formed Heads LongitudinalPlane TransversePlane combined with other peak stresses occurring at the same location
a.fatigue evaluation. I
Problem
- (r/R)
2.0 2.o - (r/R) 3.I 1.2 1.0 a1
-o.2 2.O - (r/R) -0.2 1.0 -o.2 z,o 11,15 A reactor vessel is 5 ft. 0 in. inside diameter with hemispherical heads'
qr -4r"/D^ 0 -2r"/D^ 0 -27"/D. 0
: The design pressure is 450 psi at 650'F The allowable stress of the
OPININCS, NOIZI-TS, AND IXTtRNAt TOADINGS
I I.7 TXTTRNAL IOADINGS
vcsscl is 17,5(X) psi. l'hc hcatl and shcll rrc nradc ol.rrinirnurn
thickncss
r)alcritl roundod up to (hc ncxt I in. Thc vessel is operated undcr ir Extcmal loadings cunsidered by W/?Cl arc longitudinal nx)r)lcnt, tr nsvcrse
r)lorncnt. torsional moment. and axial fbrce. Stresses at various locations on thc
cycling conditkrn.so.that a fatigue analysis is n"""r.ury. It is necessary
inside and outside surfaces are obtained by combining the stresses from variuus
to place an 8-in. inside diameter by l-in. thick nozzle, in the vessel.
Is offects. This involves considerable "bookkeeping" that WRC 107 developed t<r
the peak stress less in the head or in the shell at the nozzle junction
and help alleviate. Once the stresses are obtained according to WRC, they must be
what are the values ofpeak shesses at the maximum location in
ttre treaa combined with intemal pressure stresses to determine the overall stresses.
and shell? Thin-wall equations are used.
Bijlaard's original problem was finding the effects of structural supports on
a cylindrical shell. This initial work considered the radial loads and moments
Answers: oFar = +48,510 psi in shell over a flexible, rectangular loading surface. The initial treatment of nozzles was
an approximation based on a rigid attachment without the effects of nozzle wall
o''.*, = +27,220 psi in head
flexibility. Bijlaard extended this work to spherical shells based on a shallow
shell theory and considered both solid (rigid) attachments and nozzles with
I I.7 EXTERNAT LOADINGS flexibility parameters. Usage of the rules is generally limited to D/, between 10
and 200 for cylinders and between l0 and 250 for spheres. Usage is also limited
When extemal loadings are applied to nozzles or branch piping, local saesses to d/D oI about 0.33 for cylinders and 0.50 for spheres. However, depending
are generated at the nozzle-shell intersection. Several typis of ioading upon other parameters, the value of d/D nay go as high as 0.60 for some
may be
applied, such as sustained loadings, transient loadings,- ind thermal cylinders. A limit of 0.80 is also applied to the value of d/YD^T for both
flexibility loadings. Sustained loadings are continuorisly applied and "*paniion cylinders and spheres.
combined
with iniernal pressure, such as dead Ioads. Transient loadings are applied for The curves in WRC 107 are related to certain parameters at the intersection.
a
short period of time, such as earthquake and wind loadinls, pressure fluctu_ The two important parameters are the shell parameter and the attachment param-
ations, and water hammer loadings. The thermal expansion Ioadlngs are eter. The different applications on spherical and cylindrical shells follow.
caused
by potential axial growth of piping from temperature expansion.
-the
. When external loadings are applied to nozzles,
the nozzle and the shell or
stresses are generated in both Spherieal Shells
head. Although the stresses in thJ nozzle are both
membrane stresses, which are acting upon the entire nozzle cross The shell oarameter is
sectlon, and
local membrane stresses, which are aciing through the nozzle wall thickness,
present analysis procedures are available only for the general
stresses without r0
resorting to some procedure such as a finite element -analysis. These general
procedures usually have a way of applying a stress intensihcation
facto; (SIF)
"
:t :
..fn;r (11.s0)
that predicts the local stresses in the nozzle. The stresses generated in
the shell
or head adjacent to the nozzle are-focal stresses. A proce-<lure for determining
For a square attachment, the shell parameter is
the_se local stresses is given in detail in Welding Reseirch
Cor,rncji, Bulletin Nol
ttJ7 "
c1
It
"= (l1.sl)
| | .7.1 Locol Stresses in the Shell or Heod o.875\-RJ
Although a considerable amount of theoretical development work on local
strosses in shells from external loadings was conducted ind reported by p. p. In the attachment parameter for all solid attachments, no parameter is needed.
iiJyalff'r in the early 1950s, it was not until rhe Welding Risearch Councit For a hollow cylinder (nozzle),
ff
IlulldinNo. 107 was issued that all the miscellaneous inforriation from Bijlaard
and others was put into a concise form for easy use. The range of (11.52)
usige is
rcslricted by limitations on various parameters,'but it is infinitily better
than
t
anything before WRC 107 was issued. Currently, experimental and
theoretical T
work is being conducted to extend its useful ranse. (1 1.53)
I
396 OPIN|NOS, NOZZLES, AND EXTERNAI I.OADINGS I t.7 EXTERNAT T.OAOINGS 397
l.br a hollow squure, proper values must be read carefully because it may be necessary to interPolate
not only from line-to-line but from curve to curve. The values on adjacent charts
(11.54) do not always increase or decrease in a consistent direction. Computation sheets
0.875t are given for:
The attachment parameter for both solid and hollow is for a cylinder
e=o8i:. (r 1.57)
For a square,
= where cr (1 1.58)
*g
For a rectangle
C!
F, R.
c2
B, R^
If
t,, u=
f' -*(f; -'),' - n)\/e,k 01.5e)
If
Co}.IOIN,jD S?RESS INTDNSII1 - S
t. r,
l ) Hhcn r I o, s - I rrI:L-lL!j-$-c--[.!qi it u r" 4f 4ith:r \
K))\/e,e, s - l/2 lox+oy ! llox - ay)2 | at2 Jot r'tax - oyl' ' 4r'
u=
[' - i(' - f;),' -
(1r 60)
2) r,then t = o, s = largest absolur. ndgnitudc of either
s - dr, oy or (ox - oy)
Using these parameters and the curves given in WRC 107, stresses may be Figure 1'1.23 Computotion sh€.t for rigid onochment to.Phericol shell. (Courr.sy Welding Reseorch Council,
calculated at the inside and outside surfaces due to the various loadinss. The WRC Sulloiin lO7. A',s'Et 1965,)
I;
F-igure 11.25. All attachments to a cylinclrical shell
Figure 11.24. Hollow attachment to a spherical shell T
Mt
Mc
GF6atfia Pc?omalcra M" o
L Appliod Lootir'
p 't T=- Rh v!
g.;=
Rodiol looC,
CirG. l5h. hl, ROUND
Long. Xolttl, |lL:-i6. lb.
-15. ATTACHMENT
l. Appl,cd Loodr'
e=-lb.
3. Gemrtric Poromctcrr
Tonica f,oronl. lr =-_i^.
vc -- -in.fb. lb.
lb. P to.orsr*.-
Rod,ol Lood,
Shror Loqd, vt2_lr. . z .*
"_ : =- thocr Lccd,
Slcr Lcod, VL --lb.
v, r -
an.lb.. 02
Shcor Lood,
Ovc.terning Mom.nr, M, '- 2. Goaary
OvGrturhrng Moarcnt,
lorrronol Momcnt, i: -lb'.- ,'j# =- Vorrrl thicllorr,
Arccharat rt,dlur,
T,
aCg 'NOTE: Enrrr cll fcrco volvcr in
-
-if.lbr: 4. 5t.a3r ConcGnt.oiion
dua lcl
Focfora Yorrol odior. Rn: -an.
-rn.
a^. cccordoncr rilh aign co'vcition
5P-l to l0 Xrl
lor alicrr cnd antar ratull ' AU L 8u BL €u CL Ds
!A
,.0
t ta^26 -
_ -"(""ft)'#= f t-
F *^ (s,')'? = rd t- t-
IA
rc/ tnE
T *'(ts)' *l= F + + f -^(-#)'#
N,r\r/E;T\
ta -= xo
IL,/ tra6l
= I P
5r4- | ro l0 N,rfiiT
ilt ^'\T/ /
'' r r
= f + I I or
It-r
r9
IL/ trlt
/ 16\
t5l-l
\nzr-B /
6fL
r-Prr - + +
@ / x,rlr/ffii\ r,
+ +
3C or
-g-
? t?,a
.. (*,)' -! r
Ht \ t 7'ii7ffi= ac -
Add olgcbroicolly
tt \
lo, .ummol;on of r, r,
rr /
I :
fr{R6f
I +
ffiE'
ir
*(#)'#?' I t
t At \ +
lP- I ro l0
+ /xvT\
\ P /
?
T?
2A
tr
J.c/l,aP
xr\;ta,B-'l' 6l{c
itffi
IL
=
I
It
T -'(+) ';l ' # + + t a
_E! r
rL/litp '"("-fo)' ;;EF - t +
., +
3lr-l to l0 xyrr/if
Bl
-"\T/'iffi=
xrr,r/-.i\
7 r,
f .t-
---{a
2t-l
A- olgrleially
rllrrp -
f.t D.-tl-
"(""+-r'#= +
ol | $tott.lCt €
xyrr/EiT
r.,
+ f 5br lror
ro l*rio, I
Jo
rrlr < {rP ' =
l{t
2nc2o' + ? r f + t F t-
xrr/F;-i //Nrry'nhr \ r,
xt ""\--*l-/.ffi= .l- + lh-r dr.. ar.
ro ld, Yc T,+ =
"F
+ F
f
xv1fiiT
r *'\;;_/.ffi=
7xyffii \ 6tr
f {- llorr rtnrr &r
r. l-4. YL
Trd =
YL
;;T
+
Figvre 11.21 Computotion sheet for hollow otiochmenl to sphericol shell. (Courtesy Welding Reseorch
Council, WRC Bullerin 107, August 1965.)
399
398
4OO OPTNINOS, NOTZIIS, AND TXTTRNAL IOADINGS I I.7 IXTERNAL TOADINGS 40I
In addition tt) thc linritllions ()n tlrc gcorlrctty in thc anitlysis in MiC, thctc
^: -+L:
arc othcr lirnitations. 'Ihis analysis detennines only the stresses in the shell or
head due to the extemal loadings and thus those from intemal pressure must bc
VD,"T
added to them. Because no nozzle stresses are determined by this method, they
must be determined by a separate analysis. However, engineers felt that when where d, = diameter of opening in shell (in.)
the extemal loadings are applied to a relatively thin-walled nozzle, the highest D^ : rnean diameter of shell (in.)
stresses may be in the nozzle. For thick-walled nozzles, it appears that defor-
mation is similar to a solid attachment and maximum stresses will occur in the ? = nominal thickness of shell (in.)
shell or head adjacent to the nozzle. Bijlaard's method indicated that for a
longitudinal moment, the maximum stress occurs on the longitudinal axis. Because the ASME Code, VI[-l, has neither an acceptance criterion nor a
However, experimental results obtained in PVRC tests indicate that for larger rnethod to classify stresses, the designer has to establish a method that is
nozzles with ad/D = O.5 or larger, the maximum stress may lie somewhat off acceptable to the Authorized Inspector. For guidance, the method in the ASME
from the longitudinal axis. Thus adjustments have been made to some of the Cod;, VU-2, may be followed by considering the differences in stress theory
curves in l\lfiC Bulletin 107. In spite of these shortcomings, a reasonable and allowable stresses between the methods in VIII-I and VIII-2 This method
estimate of the stresses due to the external loadings is obtained by following
permits the designer to assign stresses into such categories as primary stresses'
wRC lo7 .
iecondary stres;s, and peak stresses depending upon what loadings are in-
Recendy, in considering certain PYRC work to extend the ueful range of cluded.
WRC 1O7 , J. L. Mershon concluded that within the range of its applicability, the
Example 11.15, shell that is 84-in. ID by 1'0-in nominal
A cylindrical
curves for loadings on a cylindrical shell could be reduced, for all practical
purposes, to an easier-to-use set of curves given in Appendix K. This set of thicknLss contains a nozzle S-in. ID by 1.0-in. nominal thickness' The design
pressure is 400 psi and the allowable stress of the material is 17.5 ksi' The nozzle
simplified curves practically eliminates the need to interpolate between various
curves in WRC 107 to determine the factors used to calculate the stresses. When is subjected to an inward radial loading of 12,000 lb and an applied moment in
the simplified curves are used, it will still be necessary to combine the internal the longitudinal directionof 150,000 in.lb. What are the combined sttesses on
pressure stresses and to develop a method of "bookkeeping" for the signs of the the lon-gitudinal axis due to these two extemal loadings using the Mershon
various stresses due to different loadings. metfodand the curves in Appendix K? The vessel is not subjected to cyclic
The sign convention used with the Mershon method is identical to that of loadiqg, and therefore no stress concentration factors need be considered'
WRC lO7, as shown in Fig. 11.25. The figure shows that stresses may be
obtained at the same locations. The relationship of the curves given in WRC and Solution
the Mershon curves given in Appendix K is as follows:
1. The shell parameter is
Solution
From Fig. K.4 N,H = 0.076
1. For the WRC method, the following shell-nozzle parameters are required:
FromFig. K.4 N6H:0.260
,5
B:0.875f;= 0.875 x a2r=
o.roz
Using these constants, the stresses due to the longitudinal moment are
R^ 42.5
determined as follows:
Y=;=i= 42's
n In addition to the stresses from the extemal loadings, the stresses from
internal pressue must b€ combined. These stresses may be determined = 9250 psi
898 Y|56 88S s"qaR
-..i --t & oi ,.i 6 I \ct .d
I
+-: I
all+
f
I
O\FF'
8833
ldui di -i ,.i d
t':+
-t-
i++l
REB :5t516;6
O\:O
..r --i ..i
ttl +'++
s:8 €98
a" +- v1 \
\o^ v1 ..!
-i -i .i
ttl t$.1 +ll
o
e88
1o\\
o\ \o ar
o
.9 t++ +tl J +tl
o ,9
t o o
o o
2
o
t O\\OF = F:o\
o .9 o'
o t++ q
l++ +++ c..l | -! ol
o o o
ao 6
tt o 6 s
o f
aa B
o :H5 E
o
o oi ..i 'd o
tll c o
-o
o
t -o
o {,
o
ao
=o o =o o
t iO\Q F
q 1 ."1 vl b
o
b
o
NINI
c ttl tt.: t.icjtl
t f
I
in
f )
9 \ q
o
o.: \s @
o -g
Eonr
-o I9E
AF,.Y
-9
-o
o eeE -o
F
q
zlaF o
l-
::c-fi:
>oA.F
F
M 405
406 oPlNlNOs, NOZUuS, ANO EXTERNAT tOAD|NOS | 1.7 EXTIRNAI LOADINOS 407
Probhms
From Fig. t" h= 6.6 * -l?41 = l6eo psi
11.16 For the same vessel described in Example 11'15, what are the stresses on
the transverse plane when the applied moment is changed from a longi-
From Fig. tc-t + = 0.12s x
ai?rq = e000 psi tudinal rnoment to a transverse moment M": 150'000 in'lb and the
radial loading remains at 12,000 lb using the method in Appendix F?
150,000
4B
FrornFig.
Mfu= 1.3 x (42.5),(0.103X1) Answer: o6: Cu = -8180 Psi
1050 psi Cr. = +30,460 psi
6 x 150,000
From Fig. 28 M,/(ML/R^O = 0.072 x
(42.5X0.103X1F
Du = +33,280 psi
Dt = -6200 Psi
= 14,800 psi
4t Cu = -3550 Psi
3. Using the intemal pressure stresses determined for Example 11.15 and
combining then with these stresses gives: Cr' : + 19'970 Psi
oO
Du = +23,030 Psi
A7 BU BL
Dt = +47O Psi
Pressure mernbrane +23,800 +23,800 + 23,800 +23,800 11.17 What are the same results using WRC l0'l?
Pressure bending + 3,400 + 3,400
Answer: o4:' Cu : -7730
-3,400 -3,400
P membrane Psi
- 1,690 - I,690 - 1,690 - l,690
P bending - 9,000 + 9,000 -9,000 + 9,000 = + 31,150 Psi
C.
M1 membrane -3,630 -3,630 +3,630 +3,630
Du = +34'670 Psr
M1 bending -9,250 +9,250 +9,250 -9,250
Totals -880 +37,100 +24,880 +25,860 Dr. = -7050 Psi
or Du = +21.820 Psi
10
x 'tactor t = O-75/h213
l|
8
51 = allowable sfress at design temperature (psi)
.9
/ = reduction factor from Table 11.11 based on number of cycles
3
.\
The design is acceptable when S5 < 51. 2
\
lrngitudinal stesses Sa due to sustained loadings, such as pressure and dead
loading, shall not exceed S7,. When 51 ) .[, the difference may be added to the
t! 1.5
I
cl
I I
tf.
term 0.2551 in Eq. 11.57. This gives 1.00
0.75
,So :/[1.255" + 0.255, + (Sr - Sz)] 0.50 1 end flanged cr = i]
o.375 2 ends flanged c1 =i1l3
or o.25
s.t EE
oo E
o e
q:33 33:
o o
sA =/[1.25(s" + s) _.ir.l (11.6s) Characteristic t
1l't I (
rs -lf't I s
q
lms
t)t
ill,\
N ili@
o
W ilM
lIrJ H
g
e't rFi I rF,ls
E€o *lh :l {.- Jl{
rr-,.|s
#E .RIG
-i-
EIN
9l'
+l r,-rs
<f
+
It\
tFr
c adl
\t
rr-. | {
It\ l'> (,)l *l =r
rr.., I .n
+ -l- +
€'\ l< o\ l{ o\l{ o, lE
9X <i lt ol\ e l"t <i l!
o
g.F
o
oF. (.:9
dltli
o\ t{ o'lQ l{ o
dl\lt
o. o.
E
o !.) qli o.
ctl\
lE. o. o. lQ
ctl\ ..tF ct l\ ct lt cil\ c]
o rt) ot{
=
o
'=ll
E x .!s 9I's !a
€lsl;'
vr
i I'q
l;
rn
!
o
o
o !>r
c --&-
!-
E}?
3bX
.:
g E EE J{ A
-o
x
'Eo
61!.
lee
d0
E €E E"*ii"Eq
"E Ea
o
E S '^c
i 'r::
0 - TE 35F i - gSEFe"gE
;
d
F: €: 9€
eE -dsF Fi;-
€ ^.,* <;
e .i ltt
Es
-9
-o
B sY HH.t g;Ill
it .E
&,
I .bv
trl Fr' EtIigEtEEEFf
4r0 4ll
illr€ tr I h
E;3
Ei E =
{
5
E
g
F"
5
Eg E E ; B*
3E
€;E 7
€r t €9c
i
E
g9
613
hF
2A
;: i gHE
E; r i.Ex*,+
€
p,B
'E I
E€ E Z.E.gEE }F €t
Es E E.F*€E
>!!
P.2
'*6
EOEE{ EE g E:.gCi
g.E E ssso; .E
gq 2-\
eltt-,
,-->
\tRl
ac a
sb E l!";:5 g
EE
€ra
E.Ets
E--R
q
+
o
E
Eg
{>r E
'{
9
5
E ir-a
c
o
o .9.
-E .s
EE EO E .9 -EE
6 F!
Jg; ET
di >, a.- o
9'x E
.E
>, *!€
.z .-' i'
o
o AE€ !E' * q
E *E €
E*c c$F ;
*;
.i;i ao .-' >i >-:--
,S I E .l- =6
E 3.3 €t
.i -t FF E e
c t\ 5fi
d"
at)
.9
o
ll'6 ?EH E:E ; t
'E
:H Hfr R H6 {lrF.
-e;
E
co Fei i:€ E g €
e; a 5 E --:-\
E9 d o o { la-
.g
o
p
.EE Bfl
gESF EE€EI
F
.3 FE.E
Eg
?A EFs€ggg
412 4t3
1t1 ollt{lt{ol, f{ollt|t, AND rxil${ r KTAD|NO3 NO'rltNCtATURt 4lt
Tobb ll,ll Strcr-Rongr Rrductlon 7. Determine allowable stress range S,r:
Focl,oru ( f)
Cycles, rV Factor, / / = 0.8 for 20,000 cycles
n=4 __ 1.312
R, 5.719 =n,r"n Answer: M. = Mr = 331,400 in.-lb
u:H=z.qo
n-'-
t = o.75i" + i = o.7s(2.$) + 0.25 = 2.05 (
3. Determine torsional stess:
NOMENCTATURE
s,=E=ffi=*oo.t
4. Determine the bending shess: Individual nomenclature is used throughout Chapter 11 and usually noted close
to where used. The following gives some general nomenclature:
2.05 x 600,000), + (2.40 x 900,000
Sa= : 20,770 psi p, or P = intemal design prcssure or maximum allowable working pressure
122.6 (psi)
5. Determine the stess range: F" : extemally applied axial force (lb)
n : extemally applied horizontal force (lb)
s" - !*|14 = \/Ao,nTT4@ - 2t,t7o psi
M6 = extemally applied bending moment (in.-lb)
6. Determine sustained longitudinal stress:
OT = total local stess at opening (psi)
s : allowable tensile stress (psi)
sL: ezu) nl4i: 3760 psi
:
D inside diameter of shell (in.)
BIBI.IOGRAPHY 417
4 t6 OPTNINOS, NOZZtTS. AND TXTTRNAT I.OADINGS
"strcsscs liorl Radial Loads aDd Lxlonl l MoDrcnls in Cylintlrical I'r'cssttrc Vcs
d = insidc dianrctcr ol nozzle (in.) scls," Wtltlint: Journal, Vol. 34, Rcsearch Supplcncnt, pp 601ts-617s, 1955
: inside radius of opening (in.) -, "Computation of the Sbesses ftom Local Loads in Sphcrical Prcssurc Vcsscls or
Pressure vessel Heads," Wewing Research Council, Bulletin No. 34, New York, March
= distance from center of opening to point being examined (in.) ,l 195't.
-, "Local Stresses irr Spherical Shells from Radial or Moment Loadings," Weklirg
r, : nominal thickness of shell (in.)
14.
Joumal, Vol. 36, Research Supplement, pp. 24ls-243s, 1957.
T^ = nominal thickness of nozzle (in.) -, "Sresses in a Spherical vessel from Radial l,oads Acting on a Pipe," weldinS
Research Council, Bulletin No. 49, New Yo*, April 1959
= minimum required thickness of shell (in.)
-, "Stresses in a Spherical Vessel from Extemal Moments Acting on a Pipe," ibid , pp
3t-62.
= minimum required thickness of nozzle (in.)
17. "Influence of a Reinforcing Pad on the Stresses in a Spherical Vessel under Local
-,
l-oading," ibid., pp. 63-?3.
- , "Additional Data on Stresses in Cylindrical Shells under Local Loading," ibid., pp.
l0-50.
-
REFERENCES
1. 'ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code," ANSVASME BPV, American Society of Me-
chanical Enginee$, New York, 1983.
2. 'ANSI/ASME Code for Pressure Piping B3l" ANSI/ASME 831, American Society of BIBLIOGRAPHY
Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1980.
3. Harvey, J. F., Theory and Design of Modern Pressure Vessels, 2nd ed., Van Nostland
Reinhold, hinc€ton, N.J., 1974.
4, Rodabaugh, E. C., and R. C. Gwaltney, "Inside Versus Outside Reinforcing of Nozzles in
Ellyin, F., "An Experimental Study of Elasto-Plastic Response of Branch-Pipe Tee Connections
Subjected to lntemal hessure, Extemal Couples, and Combined lrading," wRC BulletinNo
Spherical Shells with Pressure Loading," Phase Report 117-7, January 1974, Battelle-
230, Welding Research Council, New York, September 1977.
Columbus Inboratory, Columbus, Ohio.
Ellyin, F., "Elastic Stresses Near a Skewed Hole in a FIat Plate and Applications to Oblique Nozzle
5. Rodabaugh, E. C., "Proposed Altemate Rules for Use in ASME Codes," Phase Report 117-3,
in Shells," WRC 8llrrerln No. 153, Welding Research Council, New York,
Attachments
August 1969, Battelle-Columbus Laboratory, Columbus, Ohio,
August 1970.
6, Rules and Regulations for the Classifcatior o/SiDJ, Lloyd's Register of Shipping, Irndon,
l98l. Ellyin F., "Experimental Investigation of Limit lnads of Nozzles in Cylinddcal Vessels"' wRc
BulletinNo.2lg, welding Research Council, New York, September 1976
7. Sterling, F. W ,, Marine E gi eers Handbook, McCtraw-Hill, New York, 1920.
Eringen, A. C., A. K. Naghdi, S. S. Mahmood, C. C. Thiel, and T. Ariman, "Stress Concen-
E. Porowski, J. S., W, J. O'Donnell, and J. R. Fan, "Limit Design of Perforated Cylindrical
trations in Two Normatly Intersecting Cylindrical Shells Subject to lntemal hessure," WRC
Shells per ASME Code," Jounal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Vol. 99, Sedes J, No. 4,
Bulletin No. 139, welding Research Council, New York, April 1969.
November 197?.
q- Fidler, R., "A Photoelastic Analysis of Oblique Cylinder In&fiections Subjected to Intemal
Wichman, K. R., A. G. Hopper, and J. L. Mershon, "Local Stresses in Spherical and Ptesslure," WRC Bulletin No. 153, Welding Research Council, New York, August 1970.
Cylindrical Shells due to Extemal lradings," Welding Research Council, Bulletin No. 107,
Ncw York, August 1965. Findlay, G. E. and J. spenc€, "Bending ofPipe Bends with Elliptic Cross Sections," I/Rc B!.rletin
No. 164, Welding Research Council, New York, August 1971.
lll. Bijlaad, P. P., "Shesses from Local Loadings in Cylindrical Pressure Vessels," T/ans.
I.\ME, Vol. 77. pp. 805-816. 1955. Gwaltney, R. C., and J. M. Corum, "An Analytical Study of Inside and Outside Compact
Reinforcement for Radial Nozzles in Spherical Sheus," ORNL 4732, June 1974, Oak Ridge
ll. _, "Stresses ftom Radial Loads in Cylindrical Pressue Vessels," Welding .loutnal,
National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn.
vol. 33, Research Supplement, pp. 6l5s-623s, 1954.
al! oPlNtt{ot, t{ozz[3, aNo rxTaRNAt r,oAotNos BIEIIOORAPHY 4I9
Kruus, H., "A Rcvlcw dnd llvlluution of Computcr Program6 for thc Analysis of Strcsscs in the Conelation of Photoelestic and Stcel Model Data for Nozzlc Con'
SellcrB. F., "A Note on
PrcBsun Vc$scls," MtC BulletinNo. 108, Wclding Research Couocil, New York, September ne.tions in Cylindrical Shells," WRC Blt eri, No l39, Welding Resealch Council, Ncw
1965.
Yo!k, April 1969.
teveD, M. M., "Photoelastic Determination of the Sftesses at Oblique Openings in Plates and
Taylor, C. E,, and N. C. Lind, "Photo€lastic Study of the Stresses neat Operdngs in hcssure
Shells," WftC Bunettu No. 153, Welding Resea.ch Council, New York, August 1970.
Vessels," WRC Burkr,t No. ll3, Welding Resea.ch Council, New York, April 1966'
teven, M. M., "Phoioelastic Determination of thc Shesses in Reinforced Openings in hessure
Tso, F. K. W., J. w. Bryson, R. A weed, and S. E. Moore' "Stress Analysis of Cylindrical
Pressure Vessels with Closely Spaced Nozzles by the Fhit€ Element Melhod"'in Vol l'
Vessels," WRC Bulletirr No. ll3, Welding Resea.ch Council, New York, April 1 6.
Lind, N. C., A. N. Sherboume, F. Ellyin, and J. Dainora, "Plastic Tests of Two Branch-pipe Stres! Analysis of vessels with Two Closely Spaced Nozzles under Intemlrl Pressure'
Connections," lyRC trrrerir No. 164, Welditrg Research Council, New York, August 1971. oRNL/NUIiEG-18/vl, November 1977, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, oak Ridge, Tenn'
Marwell, R. L., atrd R. W. Holland, 'collaps€ Test of a Thin-Walled Cylin&ical Pressue Vesscl
with Radially Attached Nozzle," WRC Bulletin No. 230, Welding Research CouDcil, New
Yort, September 1977.
Mershon, J. L. , "Intetpretive Repoit orr Obliqle Nozzle Connections in hessure Vessel Heads and
Shells udder Ifternal Pres$ur€ tading," WXC Sarr?rrn No. 153, Welding Research Council,
New Yort, August 1970.
Mershon J. L., "Preliminary Evaluation of PVRC Photoelastic Test Data on Reinforced Openings
in Pressur€ Vessels," WRC Bullain No. I13, Welding Research Council, New York, April
1966.
Raju, P. P., '"Tbre€-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of 45" Lateral Model | (tl/D = 0.08,
D/T = lO, under External i&Plarc MomeDt lrading," TR-3984-2, Teledyne Engin€edng
Services, Waltham. Mass. December 1980.
Raju, P. P,, "Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of 45"I-ateral Modelz(d/D :0.5,
D/f : n) under Int€rtral hessur€ and Extemal in-Plane Moment Loading," TR-3984-1,
T€lcdyne Engineeriry Services, Waltham, Mass., December 1980.
Raju, P, P., "Tbree-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of 45" Lareral Model l(d/D = 0.08,
D/T = lO) under Internal Pressure and Extemal in-Plane Moment Loadings," TR-3X9-1,
revis€d A, Teledyne Engineering Services, Waltham, Mass., January 1980.
Riley, W, F., "Experime al Detennination of Stress Disributioni in Thin-Walled Cylindrical and
Spherical Pressure Vess€ls wilh Ciltula. Nozzles," WRC BulletinNo. 108, Welding Research l
Council, New York, September 1965.
Rodabaugh, E. C., "Elastic Stesses in Nozzles iD Pressue Vessels with Intemal Pressue Load-
itr8," Phas€ Repoft ll7-1, April 1969, Battelle-Colubus Laboratory, Columbus, Ohio.
Rodabaugh, E. C., "Review of Service Experietrc€ atrd Test Data on q)ening$ in Pressure Vessels
with Non-I egral ReiDforcidg," WRC Bulletin No. 166, Weldiog Research Council, New
York, October 1971.
Rodabaugh, E. C. , and R. C. Gwahiey, 'Additional Data on Elastic Stresses in Nozzles in Pre$sulE
Vessels with Intemal Pressure loading," Phase Report ll7-2, December 1971, Battelle-
Columbus kboratory, Columbus, Ohio.
Rodabaugh, E. C,, aDd R. C. cwaltoey, "Elastic Stsesses at Reinforced Nozzles ir Spherical Shells
with Pressur€ and Moment Loadiog," Phase Report ll?-gR, September 1976, Battelle-
Columbus Iaboratory, Columbus, Ohio.
Rodabaugh, E, C,, and S. E. Moore, "Evaluation of the Plastic Characte.istics of Piping hoducts
in Relation to ASME Code Cdteiia," NUREC/CR-0261 ORNI-/Sub-2913/8, Oak Ridge
National Inboratory, Oak Ridge, TeIm., July 1978.
Schroeder, J., K. R. Srinivasaiah, and P, Graham, "Analysis of Test Data on Bmnch Connections
Expos€d to Intemal Pressure and/or Extemal Coluples," WRC Bulk,n No. 200, Welding
Research Council. New York. Novemb€r 1974.
Schoeder, t.,
and P, Tugcu, "Plastic Stability of Pipes and Te€s Exposed to Extemal Couples,"
WRC Bullctin No, 238, Welding Research Couucil, New York, June 1978.
CHAPTER 12
VESSEL SUPPORTS
Ditfereni v$sel supporis. (Courresy of the Noofer Corporotion: St. touir, Mo.)
421
420
412 VISSfl" SUPPORTS I2.2 SKIRT AND BASE RING DESIGN
I2.I INTRODUCTION
I.'igure 12. lc shows an alternate design where the lcgs irLre attached to lugs that
in tum are welded to the vessel. The bending stiffness of the shell and its ability
Process equipment is normally supported by one of the following methods: to resist the moments adequately, must be considered. The cross-bracing ol the
legs may be needed to minimize lateral and torsional movements.
1. Skirts
Vessels supported by ring girders, (Fig. 12.1d), are usually placed within a
2. Support legs structural frame. The ring girder has the advantage of supporting torsional and
3. Support lugs a;. bending moments resulting from the transfer of loads from the vessel wall to the
4, Ring girders supports.
5. Saddles Horizontal vessels, (Fig. l2.le), Ne normally supported by saddles. Stiff-
ening rings may be required if the shell is too thin to transfer the loads to the
Most vertical vessels are supported by skirts, as shown in Fig. 12.Ic. Skirts saddles. The problem of thermal expansion must also be considered.
are-economical because they generally transfer the loads from the vessel by shear
action. They also hansfer the loads to the foundation through anchor bolts and
bearing plates. I2,2 SKIRT AND BASE RING DESIGN
I*g-supported vessels are normally lightweight and the legs provide easy
access to the bottom of the vessel. An economic design is shown in Fig. 12. lb, Design of the skirt consists of first determining the dead weight of the vessel W
where the legs attach directly to the vessel and the loads are transferredby shear and bending moment M due to wind and earthquake forces (see Chapter I 6) . The
action. stress in the skirt is then determined from
(f = -w -+-Mc (r2.r)
^ I
In most practical applications, the ratio R/t ) 10. Hence, the area A and the
moment of inertia I is exPressed as
A : 2rRt
I: rR3 t
(d) Because the compressive stress is larger than the tensile stress, it usually
Rins Gl rder (e) Saddtes
controls the skirt design and is kept below the skirt's allowable axial com-
Figur€ l2.l Vessel supporrs.
pressive stress as given by Eq. 8.15.
VESSIt SUPPORTS
Toble 12.2 Bolt Dimensions ond Cleorqnces Bolting Dqtd
Atlcr the thickncss of the skirt r is determined, the next step is designing the
anchor bolts. For a given number of bolts Nthe total bolt area can be expressed Nut Dimensions
as NA where A is the area of one bolt. The moment of inertia of bolts about the
vessel's neutral axis is I = NAR2/2.'fhtts, Eq. 12.1 is Bolt No. of Root Across Across Bolt Radial Edge Wrench
Size Thrcads Arca (in.'?) Flats Corners Spacing Distance Distance Diameter
B RE a,
M : 1500 ft-kips and temperature = 300. F. Assume A307 bolts and use
Figure 8. 11 for the exiemal pressure chart.
3i8 v 7 .487 5 5.515 tt a= Ji 7i
3i8 8.'749 5.928 '7L 8
Skirt design
Tqble 12. I
Allowable Cross-Sectional
Bolt Tensile Area
Type Stress (ksi) (in.')
tr/^ 0.9743\'
4307 20
t\" - -7rr- 1
4325 40 Nominal
4449 40 Nominal
A.490 54 Nominal
From Eq. 8.15, 1. The contribution of the bolts on the compression side is negligible'
2. The bolts on the tension side are assumed to act as a continuous ring of
0.125 width r", where r" is calculated from the equation
A: RJt
= 0.001 I
,,=4
zrd
(t2.4)
From Table 12.2 W l|.-lln. diameter bolts (N' =.S). Thus from Table 12.1,
Allowable
1=,t" =W=t-2k (12.6)
4. Concrete on the compression side is assumed to have a width t" that is the
same as the width of the base plate.
The disance between I and the neutral axis expressed by 12 is
6.
The allowable complessive stress of concretel is taken from Table 12.3.
The ratio of the modulus of elasticity of steel to that of concrete is defined ''t"=4l<r/z+nt't+t.st*t"
2L
n+o
(r/2 * 7) sinT * cosT
f (r2.8)
as n. J
Similarly, the total force C of the compressive area of the concrete is given by
n: .E"
Ec
=f'/e,
f" e"-f"e" f"a"
b=<,,*-{;lls::=;v] (12.e)
In an elastic analysis, the stains in the concrete and steel at any location are the
same. Hence, e" : e, and
c=(t,+*"r\h*
':ti - ,=* The distance /3 between C and the neuhal axis is
Also, from Frg. t2.2c, using similar triangles
, _ dl(n/2 -z)(sin'zy + l/21 - 1.S(sinycosy)'l
f,
d-kd
nf.
kd
"-216]
The relationship between extemal forces M and I7 and the intemal forces I and
C are derived from Fig. 12.2c. He,nce
x,1= lJ2's)
2M"=O
1] 1Jnf"
From these assumptions afr Fig, 12.2, the following relationships are
obtained: M - w(h + h) - r(h + 4) = 0
alo v|lilt lutFom 12,2 SKIRT AND lASl RINO DlllON .ltl
0nd Example 12,2, ln Example 12.1, it was found that l2-lN in. A307 anchor
bolts were needed for a vessel with an outside radius R = 7 ft,Wt = 160 kips,
^t = M-W(\+l)
1ra
(12. r0) M = 1500 ft-kips, and a skht thickness of0.375 in. If/l = 3000 psi, determine
1, the actual stess in the concrete and bolts.
Similarly,
Sohiion. By referring to Fig. 12.3 and Table 12.2, for le-:ff' bolts, the bolt
)r',=o circle can be calculated as
1a = o.srr
:1 = 0.8s
(t
&: 2.157
49,750
:35.230
(0.027 3)(r7 2.2s / 2) (2. 1 s7), 35,230
: 9810 psi
(o.027 3)(t7 2.2s / 2) Q.e 47 )
: 5085 psi
From Eq. 12.1I
C = t95,230
C = 49,750 + 160,000 f"=42psi
:2O9,750lb
and
Equation 12.9 gives
K: : 0.076
2@,750 r+(5085/10+42)
f": lo.on3 + (10x7.37st (t72.2s/2) (r.836)
which is apptoximately the same as the assumed value. Hence;[ = 5085 psi and
= 18 psi
I" =42 psi is the answer. I
,4r.tll',t!tf!,t;;
The base ring is designed both for the effect of the concrete-bearing load on the
side of the foundation under compression and for the bblt force on the other side r]--l
of the foundation in tension. On the compressive side, the base ring can bc
assumed as a cantilever beam subjected tol as shown in Fig. 12.4. The required
ls-l
lrl
thickness is obtained from
PARTIAL VIEW
6lj4
C= __V t t: l6It4 OF
\/; BASE RING
(") (b)
Substituting for M the value
M= r!-
: (,
wherc t required base ring thickness on the compressive side of the neufal
Fisuru 12.5
axis
F(t) = 21,1016 - dr
h + u, (a - fi j
or
__r' Mp=
2[2n /a + a /2t - d(2/a + r/21)']
Using. a load factor of 1.7 and a factor of l.l5 to allow for fleld-line comer
effect,r the equation
^4M
't'
Fi$,r. | 2.a
lta w||tt tuDotTl I2.2 SKIRT AND !A3! RINO DISION
(f =
l.5Fb . force F in bolts = 17,500 x 1.405
(12.r4)
ntzh
-:-
= 24,6M lb
u.c)(b4)
'' zzh
From thls trblc, cloarancc for wrcnch diametcr is 3.75 in. Allowing for gusset
flllct wclds, the distance between gussets is as shown in Fig. 12.7i. froi fq. --+--
12.13. /F lor
I t 91 x z4-roo
-- t-i-7
\i-_/
v q
Jtcrta,r
'4-,4
ile- designq tlis point has a choice to make. One can either use a base ring
I1.07
thickness of in., which is controlled
by bolt load, or use a base rin! [Iil-[f[ff]w
thickness of 0.73 in. with anchor chairs, as shown n Fig. 12.7.
The stess in the shell is obtained from Eq. 12.14 as
ruro,
1.5x24.600x6
"- = -1t x oigt n \7V ,,,u,"'r.,
: 10,4O0 psi
This sbess is combined with the axial stress and the total must be less than thre€ Column B in Fig. 12.8 is designed to carry shear in accordance with the equation
tirnes the allowable stess. I
T
-Il=VQ
r
I2,3 DESIGN OF SUPPORT IEGS
I
The shearihg force f at the top of columns B causes bending mornent in the
column if no cross-bracing is used. With cross-bracing the force T is resolved
Support legs are designed to take into consideration axial loads, bendins mo_
irito axial forces as shown in Example 12.4.
ments, and shear forces in tlre vessel. Refering so Fig. 12.g we see that at-cross
section A-A all forces are expressed in terms of M, V, and W. The axial force
W.is canie.d uniformly by all columns. Bending moment M is carried by the Example 12.4. Determine the forces in columns A and B of the vessel shown
columns away from the neutral axis and the shearing forces v are carried by the in Fig. 12.9.
columns closest to the neutral axis as shown in Fie. 12.g.
Column A in Fig. 12.8 is designed by using Eql I2.3 given by Sohtlion. Axial force in colurnns A and B due to W is
P =-w * 2tu1
F= w 240 :30
n{ -NR N8
where P: load per column Axial force in column A due to M is
W = weight of vessel
iV : number of columns
_ 2t4
.NR
R = radius of columns' circle 2x20p,0
M = noment due to wind or earthquake loads
--"--*-"-ry*"trffiffitrufft
t2.3 DIS|ON Ot SUPPOnT uog 4l
rr3t. I'he quantity p of the crosshatched area in this figure is givcn by
a= wo(?,\
\1t /
/= 50k = 2:r2t
M-2aaa8Fr
The force Il is then given by
. V (2r2t) v
(b) "H- (in3t)(zt)- nrt -2V
A
a= (o.z6sr)(:3y
/
: 12.50 kips
(d) This force Il is normally resolved into two components as shown in Fig. 12.9d'
X= /2.5 Force U is a r{dial force on the shell and force X is a horizontal force in the plane
of the cross-b\acing.
u=W
h F : kips
#n:6e.61
The moment of inertia I of the whole cross section in Fig. 12.9c is given by force E = = 7O.lt fip.
BA
"n
vtss suPPokrs
I2,5 RING GIRDTRS
total forcc in column B : -50 - 69.61 : 119.61 kio M": Fe ( r2. r5)
total force in bracing : 70.91 kips I
and the maximum stress in the shell is calculated from reference 2. Both mem-
If the cross-bracing is eliminated in Example 12.4, the shear force tends to brane and bending stresses are calculated. Details ofthe required calculations are
cause a bending moment in column B. Assuming the bottom end of the columns well established in reference 2. Further treatment of this topic is unnecessary in
pinned, the horizontal force causes a bending moment at the top of the column this book.
of magnitude 12.5 x 20 ft : 250 k-ft. Thus, without a bracing system, column
B must be designed to withstand a compressive force of 50 kips plus a bending
moment of 250 k-ft rather than a compressive force of 119.61 kips with a bracing I2.5 RING GIRDERS
system.
Note that the absence of a cross-bracing causes the tops of the columns to Ring girders (Fig. lz.ld), are common in elevated vessels supported by a
sway laterally because of reduced rigidity. This can also cause excessive vi- structural frame. An exact analysis of the stresses in a ring girder due to various
bration or deformation of the vessel. loading conditions is very complicated. For a uniform load, the stresses and
forces can be determined easily with the following assumptions:
Based on these assumptions, t}le moments, shears, and torsion at the supports
and in-between supports are given by
M, = Kzwr2 M^ : Kswrz
V, : Ka,wr v^:o (12.16)
r, =0 T^:o
where M,, V,, T" = support moment, shear, and torsion, respectively. Posi
tive direction is shown in Fig. 12.11.
M,, V^, T^ = midspan moment, shear and torsion, respectively
)r-l
t4 1,.,
t
r: radius
The maximum torsional moment occurs at the ansles shown in Table I 2 .5 and
Fisur€ 12.10 is given by
Ifl' Viiiliti,hom f 2,t milo ottDltt 4t
_ In deriving Eqs. 12.16 it is assumed that thc loade and thc rcactions rct
through the neutal axis ofthe girder. In pressure vessels the loads are tansfcrre.d
to the ring girder through the shell. If the ring girder is taken as a channel section
as in Fig, l2.l3a, tben the loads in the sh-ell cause a bending moment in
the
girder because they are not applied through the shear (flexural) center.
This
moment, shown in Frg. l2.l2a, has the magnitude
m=-we
Figuro l2.l I where e is the shear c€nter moment arm, which can be expressed as
: b2d2h
T*" Kewr2 (r2.r7) e=
41,
The moment, shear, and torsion expressions for any given location between
The uniform bending moment m causes tension hoop sbess above the r_axis
supports are obtained ftom
and compression hoop stress below the.x-axis as shown in Fig. l2.l2b. T\e
,,
M=-mr= -v,rb2d2h
4L /.tsev-rr * rt
mry
a:
L
(12.19)
wb2d2hry
4I?
where o- = sftess
D = width of flange
d = distance between flanses
ft = flange thickness
I, = rnoment of inertia of girder
r : radius of vessel
r = shell thickness
w = unifonn applied load
At the supports, the reaction eccentricity tends to produce compressive forces (bl
.
in the top flange and tensile forces in the bottom one as shown in Fig.. 12.13c.
(c)
Figurc 12.13
The.top and bottom flanges can be assumed to fansfer the loads as shJwn in Fig,
12.13b. TIla forces are derived as
At the supports, 0 = 0 and
H W$tt tupPotll
f 2,6 SADDU tUPPOmt 49
Solutlon
r,_ = .f,| cos a
7_.i
smt w 200
(zXl00) =
0.637 k-in.
fia
v,: +!:!s
a .a
from Table 12.5, with N = 8,
t-z & = -0.0519 Kc= 0.3926
Ks : -0.02.52 K6==3.940x10-3
The positive directions of M1, F1, and % are shown in Fig. 12. l3c.
Maximum torsion occurs at 9.53' ftom support.
Exanp!9 12.5. The ring girder shown in Fig. 12.t4 is supporred at eight
points. If I7 = 200 kips, find the forces in the ring at the supports and at the The forces given by Eqs. 12.16, 12.19, afi 12.?I are detemrined in Table
point of maximum torsional moment. Fig. 12.15 at the supports and at the point of maximum
12.6 and illustrated in
torsion.
Horizontal vessels supported by two saddles (Fig; 12. le) act as simply supported
beams. For vesSels with dished heads (Fig. 12.16a) the equivalent beam lenglh
is taken as .L -l 4H 13 where L is the tangent-to-tangent length of the vessel and
.br (,
At Support At Point of Maximum Torsion
Eq. 12.16
M", M^ -82.65 k-in. 0 k-in.
v", v^ 12.50 k 7.20k
L,T^ 0 6.n k-ln.
Eq. 12.19
M -60.05 k-in. -60.05 k-in.
Eq. 12.2V
Mf +40.54 k-in. -101.50 k-in.
Fr 14.80k 13.58k
lxx = 587.4Inl u -6.13 k -8.50 k
" Ihese equatioas apply at poifis a and D; poirts A and C have opposite signs.
'-. Wk+e'\
_ 200 1.89 + 4
812
= 12.'26'
a==z:45o
6'
Flgure 12.14
t2.6 SADD!! SUPPORTI 4tl
Il is the depth of the heads. The vertical load on each head is given by
V = 2IIw 13 and is assumed to act at the center of gravity of the head. Thc
horizontal pfessure on the heads due to liquid heads is resist€d by a horizontal
force F acting as shown n Fig. L2.l6b.It is interesting to note that for hemi-
spherical heads where 11 is equal to r, the bending moment at the head{o-shell
junction due to force F and vertical force V is zero. The bending moFent at any
M=60.05 K-in point in the vessel is obtained from statics as shown nFig. n/f6 lL b
The section modulus of the shell between the saddles is I/c and is expressed
as rr2t. At the saddles, the effective section modulus is reduced due to the
dqfonnation of the shell which renders the full cross section less effective.
Research has shown3 that the length of the effective cross section of the shell is
equal to the arc length of the contact angle of the saddle plus one-sixth of the
Fo.f.! or Support. Fotce. tt point ot l rrinr,n
unstiffened shell, as shown in Fig. 12.17. The section modulus of the arc length
Figur. 12.15 that is in t€nsion is expressed as
+
Z: r2t
[4
Thus the maximum longitudinal stress values can be expressed as
L/
,TEI
'(. F=r.w
Fisur. 12.16
450 tigur. 12.17
112 Vllln tuPForTl t2.6 SADDI tUPPOtTt 4t0
whorc or - longltudinal bcnding shoss in shell (ksi) The shearing stress at the saddle area is influenced by the deformation of thc
unstiffened shell above the saddle. Experimental research has shown that the
I7 = weight of vessel plus its contents (kips) shear near the saddle is distributed along an arc length of
t = length of vessel between tangent lines (in.)
r: radius of vessel (in.) t=2,(!+9\
" \z 20)
t= thickness of shell (in.)
c,:
'
J-
,ft't
as shown in Fig. 12.18. The shearing stress can then be calculaied as
a, = CtV (12.24)
^-ll IsinA/A - cosA
"-r4LA+;inE;I-2Giltlfu)l
a
wher€
t=o+E
^
Cr : -;- sin d for saddles away from heads
The shear sress in tlre shell between the saddles is computed by assuming a n\n-d+srnccos)
sinusoidal distribution of the shear forces where the maximum value is at c sinacosa
ihe
- flI6 / -(l + Smdcosc/)
sin
equator, given by for saddles near heads
\n-
o' = I (12.23) where r : radius of vessel
nn 'io
' a: 0/2 + F/20
where @ is measured as shown in Fig. 12.18.
d= ang(e as rneasured in Fig. 12.18
\
h : ngle that varies between z - a and r
o-" = shear sftess
.
Equation l2.Z is also used to check.the stess in the head. In this case the
value of t in the expression for C3 is taken as the thickness of head rather than
shell.
The circumferential stress in lhe shell at the saddle area is calculated by
assuming the shell above the saddle 0o act as a fixed arch subjected to shearing
s&ess as illustated in Fig. 12.19. Using the theory of indeterminate stuctures,
the moment at any point along the arch can be expressed as
wrf - s I
Ma = *anLa | cos {(sin'zB - iFsin2F + 79'z cos2 F)
L
/1 | \
+ dsind(iB'z + osnzB -
sin,9)
I
+ jFcosPQF + sin2p)
. lr | | \1
Flgurc 12,18
-sinp [;B
\4
+ ;o sin 2B + ;+ gcoszllll I
#a v||l|taultom 12.6 SADDtl SUPPOffg .ltt
160
3.#Pi
"r
o
o
6
o
140 V
.\
s1s
120
-Ut
t@ \
w
2 Fi$rc 12.19
o o.ol o.o2 0.o3 0.o4 0.(E 0.06 0.o7 0.G o.os o.t o.2
Cs ond C6
where
tigw.12,20 Volucr of C5 ond C6 or o tunction oI the loddlo onsl! 0. (R.f. 4, p. 212)
ll
Cc=s111.2|-:^P'-=sn2!.
'24 The maximum circumferential force P at the hom of the saddle is determined
from
The maxirnum value of M6 given by this equation occus at 0: B. Hence
the maximum circumferential bending moment in the shell can be expressed asa
,'= (v)", (12.26)
, /, Experimental work has shown that the wjdth of the shell that is effective in
..= + l*+ifu - "',8] . #*F (cs - c,)
, / j/resisting the moment in F4, 12.25 can be taken as four times the radius or and
" one-half the length of the shell, whichever is smaller.
It has also been showna that Eq. 12.25 is valid whenA/r is eqgg!-Io lf€reater
than 1.0. For A/r values of 0.5 or less, it is suggEGTll[llvalG-i@1e t, : frf,r,u(t - | "o,n * ) o"ne - le,)
reduced l tfre neaA. nor in-
between values of A/r, a reduction factor (Rf)
- l|rnA + llcosFQP+ sin2B - ssinp + B cosB)]
* = (;i -', 0.5<:<1.0 A plot of the Quantrtt C6 is shown in fi9. 12.20.
When the stess in the shell as calculated from Eq. (12.25) nd 92.?,6) is
excessive, stiffening rings are used at the vicinity of the saddles to carry the
can be used.
bending moment.
.t!6 v|llll luttotTl illuooRAPHY 1r'
NOMENCTATUR,E {, Browncll, L. 8., ald E, H, Young, Procr$ Equlpmcnt Datlgn, John Wiloy, Now York,
1959.
REFER,ENCES
l. Wood, R, H, , Pla.rric aal Elattic Design of Slabs 4nd Prater, Ronald hEss, New York, 196l .
t Wichman, K. R. , A. G, Hopper, ad J. L. Mershon, "Local Stiesses ir Spheric€l a|ld Cylin-
&ical Shels due to ErteErl lradings," BAC Barr"ri, 107, Welding Res€arch Council, New
YorL. 1965.
Zic}' L. P., "St€ss€s it Large Horizortal Cylitrdrical Pressur€ Vers€ls otr T\a,o Saddle
Suppons" in Prr$rr" Vesscl dnd Piphb DesigL, Collected Pqert 1m7-1959, lJreicat
Society of Mechanical Elgircers, New York, 1960.
PART 4
THEORY AND DESIGN
OF SPECIAL EQUIPMENT
459
''"' 'rii tir
CHAPTER I3
a
T FLAT BOTTOM TANKS
't
.!
E
I
z5
,l
'b
*
p
g
o
461
462 fl.At toTIoM TANKS
I3.I INTRODUCTION
Flat bottom tanks are normally constructed according to one of the following 7 F*
F llr.rF.=
four standards: < ld..l oZ zzz
1. API 650. Welded steel tanks for oil storage.
2, API 620. Recommended rules for design and construction of large, @
welded, low-pressure storage tanks. z F- - o.l XXX
3. ANSI 896.1. American National Standard for welded alumrnum_alloy < | 42 -i -i
storage tanks. cl cl
xxx
4, AWWA D 100. Standard for welded steel elevated tanls, standpipes, '6bE
qa- 9- E
and reservoirs for water storage.
:.: txz
Table 13.1 shows a general comparison between the requirements 6
of the various
standards. The values in the table serve as a general comparison;
however, a.l .- q. q.
specific requirements and limitations are obtaiied from the standards \o *9.9-
them_ 9e
selves.
-t tz zz zzz '6
.- Irr ,-
I3.2 API 650 TANKS
J t-z
The requkements of API 6501 are for flat bottom tanks containing
liquids with
litde or no surface pressure. The design criteria are based on simpti"fied F
equations ?
with a minimum amount of analysis.
o
ao
(,)
| 3.2. I Roof Design
o
.+ :.9
XXX ed b
Flat bottom tanks with large diameter and fixed roof normally are
designed with o ERE
E<
column-supported roofs. As the diameter gets smaller, seif_supporting
roofs < txd aa .E e .<
}!'EU
become more economical. Dome and cone ioofs (t \o XXX
-" th" -ort popolar iypes.
The following equation for designing self-supporting do-" .ooi. E
(t
F frR g
9:-?,
is obtained
^ Eq. 9.2b, which is based on a fairor
from ot saiety (FS) four: *.E 6 EE ;
co 5?)XF-
290F
d, <zx-..; .E A.{l
'H€ ^" 3
E H.c ; ::
'^
P=-
0.0625 E
(n111' (13.1) 'o r.)oo
Fe{ife
0 a€EitE
The required thickness is obtained by assuming that the maximum pressure
an a ErEb::e
E r F3::i
consists ofa live load of 25 psf, which is the assumed maximum snow load,
l
o ^\ Es 8.9
E3 E€
.9*
a dead load of a maximum roof thickness of 0.5 in. as allowed by ApI.
and
Hence
o
E e 8-: EE^ gsEEctg
EFsE EEH
v 5t | , ,t g s.2
P : 25 psf live load + 20.4 psf dead load EtrEE Ve
= 0.315 psi o tsFEE ?sEFEfE
4 aa6e
-o
o
F
,= .9
>€ 5 e*ff s trtrtrE
a6.l ttAt lOnOiit IANK!
I3.2 API 650 TANKS
. D lcs(tan 0)lo4
'= u" g zza,sq
( 13.6)
Figure 13.2 shows a plot of this equation for various factors of safety. A more
simplified equation used by API is
,: -J
400 sin 0
(13.7)
-3:sin 0.
A= 2645
API uses the simplified expression
D2
(13.9)
3000 sin 0
For tanks with small intemal pressures, the maximum pressure is limited to that
which does not cause the uplift of the tan} in the ernpty condition. Hence ftom
Fig. 13.3 the upward force due to pressure is equal to the downward force
resulting from weight of shell plus roof:
Pt?2=w.(q)(')
4 r. -.2r. /
Flgure | 3.2
PD
n= 4sin0
and
A=Dz o (13.8)
8c sin 0
Using g: 1.5,000 p€i p = 0.315 psi, and expressing D in feet and.4 in
equare inches, the rcquired area is
tlg0re 13.3
'*""'- *-^ffi**Yffiiffiitnmr
13,2 API 630 TANKT {i60
or
lrtting a = 20,000 psi and I = 490lbfit3, this equation reduces to thc approx-
Imate equation
4
P==6w+h't
- 30,8004tan0
r'N=--2 + ^6th (13.1 1)
where P = intemal pressure (in. of water)
W : weight of shell (lb) where P = intsmal pressure (in. of water)
D: diameter of tank (ft) A = required area at roof-to-shell junction (in.'?)
^ Mo tan d
r=--jr-+thy .
e=ffi+tt,
It.2 AFI 610 TANKT ilTl
Sub8titutlng thia oquatlon into Eq, 13.12 givcs
which is the circumferential oeam between courses A and B, This mcthod
considers that the bottom plate on course B stiffens the next course at point X
0.153 W
(r3.14) 0nd the maximum stess occurs at a location higher than X. This location is
30,800 tan 0
arbiharily set at "one foot."
where .4 : required tangible roof-to-shell area (in.2) At point X the hoop stress is given by
API 650 includes two rnethods for the design of shells. The
Defining y : 62.4 pcf and adding the corrosion allowance to this expression
first is called the gtves
"one-foot method," which consists of calculiting Ae re4uir"O
ttrict<r,"ss of sn"l
course A in Fig. 13.4 based on the hydrostatic pressure
at I ft above point X r)G
t:2.6p(H_- + cA (13. r s)
4:6p
V PR2
TFo= n
Fisure 13,4
.. ZB3DPR'
'= E-
?AI'IKS
'IAT 'OTTOM 13.2 APt 650 TANKS 473
'l'osts have shown that this equation is too conservative because the maximunl
strcss can be many feet away from thejunction where the pressure is reduced and
the stiffness ofthe second course becomes signincant. Accordingly, the equatbn
lirr the desisn of the bottom course is modified to read
( 13. l6)
The thickness of the second course is determined from the following equations;
.2- t, ir +<r.37s
I h. -l
- ,r*--,1 ir l'375 <;;<2'62s
h,
Fieur€ 13,5
t-=t^ + (t. -t^\l
'4/t 7l
-''
.L
The hood stress at any point along the cylinder close to
the junction ls given by
.2- t,. it L-z.ezs (t3.r7)
= 1.06 PR
where "r is the variable design point that is a function of the thicknesses of layers,
Hence tank radius, and liquid height.
In referring to Fig. 13.6,.r is the minimum value of .r1, -r2, and "r, obtained
from the following equations:
t= Ne/S
_ 2.42E ( (t/o)rt 1
P
locATtot{
Fs (r - *zltte \n /o - o.4s \/;lDl
OF
CF TAN(
or for long cylinders with E : 30 x 106 psi and p = 0.3,
3 TA
VARIAELE \ SHELL
oEstcit Fo[{T
H =77.e2
" ro.#,l/*)"
0.3iI Gh,
'"1-: r" \u/
0.61 fr/ Substituting P", : 25.6 psf and FS : 2.0, this equation becomes
'TnI
(13.19)
/
iflN. Hrr. OF xi
WHEl,l
+'1.o;c-o.xr
,6+j.-l
'll I
v \ where Il = length between stiffeners (ft)
UNRESTRAIT{ED
MDIAL t : thickness of shell (in.)
0..'ffi t D, \ lh,,t1
t.-{// --Et-
GROTIT'TH
GROTITN
D = tank diameler (ft)
The required section modulus of the stiffening ring necessary for resisting the
Figure 13.6 Elo3fic nrov€ment oI rh€ll cour!€. ot girth lateral pressure is obtained from the following classical buckling equation of a
ioint (R€t. 5).
ring:
I *=? ^ 3EI
R3
Hence
API a__100-mph wind velocity for design purposes unless a higher value is
,yses
specified. Hence
PrlilFS)
3E
P = 25.6 Psf
Because the pressure distribution may cause a vacuum
on part of the shell, the
shell is designed to withstand a yaglum pressure of 25.6 psf.
expression for the buckling of cylindrical s-hells is given
A simplified z= PHD2 FS
(r3.20)
Uy fq. O. tZ as 2AE C/D
!;rlll.rr{jwlillirfrs
1rt illT tonom ?aNl(t I3,2 APt 650 TANKT 4ll
API arsumca that tho rstio of thc outstanding leg of a stiffener to thc diameter
of the tank is not lcss than 0.015. Hence, C/D = 0.0075. Usins FS : 2.0.
P = 25.6 psf, E = 29 x 106 psi, and expressing D and If in feet,-the equation
for the required section modulus of a stiffening ring is
The requircd thickness of the bot8om plate in an ApI 650 tank is given in Table
13.1. At the shell-to-bottom plate junction, the ApI standard requires a butt- ( al
welded annular plate whose thickness varies between 0.25 and 0.15 in. and is
a function of the shess and thickness of the first shell course. The width of the
annular plate nust be adequate to support the column of water on top of it in cas€
of a foundation settlement. By referring to Fig. 13.7,
*=+ ,
lM
4M (b)
tisut 13.7
L= R
Y; /a : thickness of annular pla0e (in.)
1l: height of liquid (ft)
L= t;fr G: specific gravity of liquid
yGH
"l Exarnple 13.1. The steel tank in Fig. 13.8a contains a liquid at the roof-to-
Letring p = 62.4 pcf, a), = 33,000 psi, and expressing H in fe,et and 4 in
inches, the equation becomes shell junction level. Eesign the various tank components if G = 1.1, CA =
0.0, S = 15,000 psi. Use the "one-foot" method for shell design.
._ 195 tb
- \/GH Sohtian, For the roof design, Eq. l3.l gives
API 650 uses a factor of safety of two for the length. The length of the annular n80
plate is thus expressed as ' 2M -' 2n
' = 0.40 in. Use t : 7116 in. for the dome roof
L= 390 h
Out not less than 24 in.) (r3.22)
\/ GH For the shell design the required thickness for the bottom course is given by Eq.
':.!1].:, ., ]''' ',]i!,!r
ata torTors ?A]{t(l r3,2 APt 6!0 ?ANK3 lV'
'ltt
The required inteffiediale stiffener spacing is obtained from Eq. 13'19 ae
I/ = 6(100t)
t o:sV
I1 :6(100 x 0.25)
ft
v\s"/
Zroo
= 26.20
(.)
Because this is larger than the height of the tank, no intermediate stiffeners are
needed.
The required area of the roof-to-shell junction from Eq. 13.5 is
Angl€ 4r4xt
,DR
" 1500
_ (80x80) ,
1500
: 4.27 n.2 Use 4 x 4 x 5/8 in. angle with A = 4.61 n.2
For the bottom plate use t = ll4 in. according to Table 13.1.
Assume the annular plate is 1/4 in. thick. Then the width of the armular plate
from Eq. 13.22 is
. 39oh
L = ------_
(b) YGH
Fisur6 | 3.8
-:ffi 390 x 0.25
. 2.6(80\Qo - txl.t) The above details of construction are shown in Fig. 13.8b. I
' 15,m0
Example 13.2. In Example 13.1, determine (a) the maximum allowable inter-
= 0.29 in. Use r = 5/16 in. for the bottom course nal pressure and the maximum failure pressure, (b) the required roof-to-shell
area if a ftangible joint is required, and (c) the thickness of the shell using the
For the top course design conditions of Example 13.1 and the variable point method.
.- _2.6(80X10-1x1.1) Solation
15,000
(a) The maximum pressure that does not cause uplift of the shell is obtained
= 0.14 in. Use t - 1/4 in. for the top course according to Table 13.1
ftom Eq. 13.10:
-'. -*-ry--'fil?Yffiii irrxr
r3,2 APr 630 IANKS 4tl
wctght of eholl = (a0.82)(a)(EO)(tl)(s/16 + U4) h1 l0x12
= 57,800 tb Yrtr v(40 x 12x0.3) -10
. _ 0.245 x 57,800 ^
r'*=--lo-+Ex0.437s indicates that tz :
t2! as given by Eq. 13.17.
Equation 13.18 is based on an iterative process that is initiated by assuming a
value of f2, which can be obtained from the approximate equation
= 5.71 in. of water
: 0.21 psi 2.6H- t)' DG
-'
t":
15,000
The maximum pressure that does not cause excessive
stess ai the head-to-shell
junction is giveo by Eq. 13.11 as _2.6x9x80x1.1
15,000
(30,800x4.61x0.s77)
^ : 0.14 in.
^ -
0.t53 W
Hence -r : l0 controls and
t"" d
3oSoo
API 620 tanks2 tend to be more complicated in geometry and are generally
:llJ9:Id g hiekr-ilptt^pressu'e than Apr 650 tank;. Accordingly, trr!
r€quirements of API 620 differ significantly fiom those of ApI 650
because the
mrckn€ss of the components is obtained from shess analysis that considers
the
biaxial shess state rather than a set of simplified formulas.
_ The shess analysis procedure in Apl 6t0 is based on Eqs. 6.10 and 6.11.
Equation 6. I I for /Vd can be determined- for any shell configuration
by using the 'l .62,4 pct
summation of forces obtained from a free-body diagram.-The advantage
of a
free-body diagram is that forces other than pressure cair be accountedlor
without
C:inF tryugh T inregration process. Once Nd is determined, the value of ly'e is
obtained ftom Eq. 6.l0 as
l&*&=o (r3.23)
R2 Rr
The maximum force in the shell is at section b-D as shown in Fig. 13.10r. Total
av - ,o,ll o weight of liquid at section D-b is
w
v=!=s"ff
= 600 lb/in. Total pressure at r-, is 5 + =:rr^;*:X,:,o,
(62.4/144)(35).
(e)
lV:i
c- +-
(c)
c- _c
b- - - .-b
Tfr-{-tT
v
o)
b"-
(d)
Figuro 13.10
----d
and
iV' = 600 lb/in' Figurc 13.10 (Continvod)
&=g0=uo?o:!!)
-- srn 0.707
20-Ft Shell
= 6847 lb/in. At section c-c the value of V in the 20-ft shell is the same as V in the cone duc
to continuity. Thus
The horizontal force at trnint b is Ho = 600 lb/in. (inwards) !
Figure 13.10c shows the forc€s at point c. The weight of tiquid N1 = lt : -2777 lbli'..'
in conical
section is ,'1llol,ff^",,,',
*=4rl+R,R,+n3)
At section d-d the liquid weight is given by
_nx62.4 x 10..^" l0
.^
xzo+202) W: j,?rr,9oo + (62.4)(n)(r0)2(zs)
-3
: 457.2100 lb -(Iy+ = 3,692,000 lb
whorc t : rcquircd thickncss ol'componcnt (in.) Compressive Stress with Equal Magniludc in the Meridional and Circum-
Ne = hoop force (lb/in.) lerentinl Dbections
No : meridional force (lbs/in.) The goveming equation is obtained from Eq. 6.35 for the buckling of a spherical
J = allowable tensile stress (psi) shell with a factor of safety of four. Using E : 30,000,000 psi, the equation
becomes
E = joint efficiency similar to discussion in Section 8.1
The rules for this case are based on the axial buckling of a cylindrical shell as
/.\
r,ooo.oool;l (13.26)
given by Eq. 5.28. With E = 30,000,000 psi and a factor of safety 10, this \^/
equation becomes
This value is 1.8 times smaller than the value given by Eq. 13.25. Accordingly,
,=,.,,,o'(f) ( 13.2s)
the limit ofEq. 13.26 is established as 15,000/1.8 = 8340 psi. Thus oDElc in
Fig . I 3 . I 1 is the criteria used for components having compressive stress of equal
magnitude in the meridional and circumferential directions.
To prevent the stress in Eq. 13.25 from exceeding the allowable tensile stress
of the material, an arbihary value of 15,000 psi is established as the upper limit
Compressive Stress with Unequal Magnitude in the Meridional and Circum-
of the allowable compressive stress. This is shown in Fig. 13.11 as line OABC
where 4-B is a transition line between Eq. l3.ZS and the upper limit of 15,000 terential Directions
psi.
The criteria for this case are based on the following equations:
t ,
rrr
- actual comoressive stress
--ii_------:-i--------------
E allowaDle comDresslve sress
Figure l3.ll (Coortesy of the Anericon Perrol€um Inlritute.)
tuom OABC of fin. t:.tt
fLAt lotTot TANKS
I3,3 API 620 TANKS 491
und
Rool ol l8nk
_ actual tensile
,r^, - r-i-----_:-i_--- stress
allowaDle tenslle stress-
Then
M2+MN+N2=1.0 (13.28)
The interaction of this equation with Eq. 13.25 is shown
in Fis. 13.12.
13,3.2 Compression Rings
6
Q=Na,Wn+N1'"W"+HR (r3.2e)
:
l" *r'o is,ooo--L
when Q is compressive
(r3.30)
Flgura 13. | 2 Sioxiol stress chon for combinod retuion ond comprelsion
3O.Om p3i ro 38,OOO pst yietd srr$s
rt.oh. (Courrory of rh6 Am6ricon petrol€sm tmrirute.l = when Q is tensile
#
'.' --*""*'ffi **TffiTffi
f irmr
whorc A - roqulrtd a,rpa (in,2)
Example 13.4. Deterrnine the required thicknesses of the 20_ft shell and the
conical reducer in Example 13.3. Also detemine the required stiffening ring
arca at point c. I,et S :
20,000 psi, E = 1.0, and CA :0.O.
Sohttian
20-Ft Shell
No : -2777 lVn'
ffd = 2940lblin.
Nt : -2177 lbln.
Nd = 4236 lblin.
z
Thus forces at point d control. From Eq. 13.24,
P..niisibl. wh.r. rEf (ft bor+.E)
pldl! thi.tn... i5 nor 6v.tiir.
4236
'- 2o"ooo x lo
kt
= 0.21 in.
4t
, tf-
. 9.
t=i6-' Y-J Not P.rh'.3rbrc
Figurol3.14 som€ Fmi.libl. qnd noip6rml$lble d.lcik ot compr€$ioo'ringFiuicturo conJ?udioi. (cour-
Then
!,6!y of {|. Amlricon Peholcum lnrtituL.)
f.: o.oo+z
493
.91 IIAT IOTTOM TANK! 13.3 APr 620 TANKS 495
actuel compressive sress = ffi = +S+O Vsi actual compressive ,o"r. = o%-
u.t)6 /)
= 5710 Psi
x
allowable compressive stess from Eq. 13.25 = l.g x allowable compressive stress from Eq. 13.25 - l'8 1q10 6875 = 7290 psi
8zl40psi 106 10.5625\
\-m-)=
From Eq. 13.28, ru=ffi=0.:o
7530
: 0.38
n =W:
7290
o.ts
20,000
0.302 + 0.30 x 0.78 + 0.78'? = 0.91 0K
4940
M = ,Ooo = O.SS use t = 11/16 in. for conical hansition section
0.38'? + 0.38 x 0.59 + 0.592 =0.72 < 1.0 or user=9/16in. shell.
Compression Ring
Conical Transition Section
From Example 13.3 the discontinuity force at point c is
From Example 13.3, forces at point , are
H = -3927 lb/in. (inwards)
N, = 849 lb/in.
w. = 0.6 (120X0.s625)
Ne = 6847 tb/in.
= 4.93 in.
and from Eq. 13.24 / rtn \ (0.6875)
Wt'" = O'6 {;+ |
\u. /u// '
6847
' = 20,000 = 6.48 in.
actual rensile rt
"rr
=
ffi = 6o5o psi Use 2 in. x 12 in. ti"g. I
.9O ILAT IO'TOM TANKS
I3.4 ANS 896.I AI.UMINUM TANKS 497
I3.4 ANSI 896.I ALUMINUM TANKS
lilllowing expression, which is similar to Eq. 13.5:
The rules for ANSI 896.1 Tanksr follow the same general
criteria as ApI 650
rules. Differences in various requirements between
ai-uminum anJ sieet tants are
given in Table 13.1. , = r"oo
- Y:-,e)I
897 sin 0
(13.34)
/: ulkrwablc tcnsile stress ol'alurninum (psi) dcsign of components. Instead it outlines the general requirements associatc(l
e = joint efticiency with design loads, earthquakes, allowable compressive stress in columns, radio-
graphic examination, and so on. Most of the requirements in API 650 can bc
ANSI B96.1 does not contain mles for intermediate applied to AWWA tanks. Some exceptions are given in Table 13.1.
stiffening
'iilio.
rings. For open
top tanks, a stiffening ring is required, *hich
is basJ;; a. i" *,,
Il is defined as the overall height of the t"*
,J-E{I.'liio;;";;". ""*, REFERCNCES
- _ PHD, (FS)
(13.38)
l. Weldcd Steel Tanks for Oil StoraSe, 7th ed., API Standard 650, American Petroleum Institute,
48 E Q/D) Washiqton, D.C., 1980.
2. Recommended Rules for Design and Construction of Large, welded, Lout-Pressure Storage
In an elastic body, Tanks, 7th ed., API Standard 620, American Petroleum lnstitute, washington, D.C., 1982.
1. American Nation^l Standard for welled Aluminum-Allo! Storage fdt tJ, ANSI 896.1-1981,
America[ National Standards Institute. New York. 1981.
f = Ee ( 13.3e)
4. AwwA Standotd fot Welded Steel Elev.tted Tanks, Standpipes, and Resen'oirs for water
and for a stiffener in bending, the relationship StoraS?, AWWA Dl00-73, Afterican Water Works Association, New York, 1973.
between strain and curvarure r 5. Zick, L. P., and R. V. Mcclath, "Design of Large-Diameter Cylindrical Shells," presented
at the 33rd Midyear Meeting of the American Pekoleum Institute, 1968.
t
t= (13.40) 6, Karcher, G. G., "Stresses at the Shell-to-Bottom Junction of Elevated-Temperature Tanks" in
2R l98l Proceedings-Refning Department, 46th Midyear Meeting, American Petroleum Insti-
tute, May 1981.
Hence, from Eqs. 13.39 and 13.40
t =f BIBTIOGRAPHY
2D 2E
Steel Tanks for Liquid Storase-Steel Plate Engineering Data, Vol. l, Americao hon and Steel
Substituting-this expression into Eq. 13.3g Institute, Washington, D,C,, 197 6.
and using a factor of safety 2.0, the
expression for the required section modulus
Z becoires
501
HEAT TRANSFER IOUIPMENT
Heet transt'er cquipment is used in many applications such as boilers in power raat aNo
atiEu tYPl5
plants, heat exchangers in the petrochemical industry, and condensers and evap- .'AT|oNARY I{€AO TY?II
orators in heating and refrigerating systems. Heat transferequipment varies from '1t'-ii'
miniature heat exchangers a few inches in diameter to power boilers over 100 ----tlll!-i l,-tn
E L
ft long. This chapter presents the theoretical background and design equations
A flxlo Tuscs8fEr
of heat exchangers and boilers. ONE PA3s SHETL LIKE 'A" STATIONARY
-lL---,?'-"-'---'JU
H(AO
!i i:
---{11=i l-\
-_
la-llrI
fIXED TUBESHEI
-Jl TWO PrSs SHEI! LIKt "8" STATIONARY IIIAD
Heat exchangers in the United States are normally designed according to the WITTI TONGITIJDINAL AAfRC
-tL---.>
Standards of Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association (TEMA)I and the
ASME Code, VI[. In general, TEMA requirements are a supplement to the a I G N
ASME requirements, for they tend to include areas not discussed in the ASME. !ii!r I ftxED TutEska6t
IIKT 'N" STAT|oNARY I]EAO
Most of the TEMA design e.quations relate to tubesheet design when affected by BONNET (NftCRAI
differential pressure and temperature, expansion joints, bustles, and so on.
TEMA uses alphabetical designation to differentiate between vadous types of p
frequendy used components. This is illustrated in Fig. 14.1. The components H
OI,i'!;IDE PACKCD FLOATING
can be interchanged to form a wide variety of heat exchanger configurations, as c 'IEAO
+J11------
shown in Fig. 14.2.
Their rules, which apply to thft€ different classes of construction depending ----Lfn\ \
s .---LI $.=.!a_(n===
on the severity of service, are referred to as R, C, or B. A summarv of the J FLOATING HEAD
differences between these classes is given in Table 14.1. WTH DEVICE
'ACKNG
N
I
Tqble 14.l Some TEMA Requiremenfs of Closses R, C, qnd B Exchongers PUTI THROIJOh fLOATING HEAO
K o_-
CIIANNEL II '1-1-------------\\
|| ,l
u
Paragaph KETILf TYPE RE'OILEN
fu-
IJ-IIJBf SUNOLE
Service t.l2 Severe Moderate General
Corrosion allowance 1.15 i rn. * in.
-l in. D x __'ii', __
(cafton steel) w --r-€:++:.,:zlTT
-----t=:E-+ \ lu
6---r=--l
Shell diameter 3.3 8-60 in. 6-60 in. 6-60 in. SPECIAL TiIGH PICSSUR€ CTOSUNE
€xrERft^trY slatED
FIOAIINC TUBTSHEEI
Minimum thickness of 4.42 i h. I in. carbon I in. carbon
longitudinal baffle ste€l steel Figurs l,(.1 Vorio{rs IEMA component6. (Courtesy of the Tutulor Exchong€r Monufo€turoi! Alsociotion, Inc.)
I in. atloys in. alloys
Minimum tie rod 4.71 ; in. i io. "1
i in.
diameter
Prefened gasket 6.32 !+ None None
contact surface
tolerance
Minimum bolt size l0. t ?n. s j in. t in.
503
AJW
Fis'lrc l,{.2 (conrinued)
The basic equation for the design of heat exchangers is obtained from Examples
7.l and 7 .2
^s
|.'APaz
= for simply supported Plate
" T
0.7 5Pa2
o= -7= for fixed plare
5(M
50s
5OO HIAT TRANS;IR IOUIPMTNT I4.2 TEMA OESION OF TUBESHETTS IN U-TUBE EXCHANOTNS 507
'-7 Vst,
-_FG (14.1)
Tle $earing stress in the tubesheet at the outer tube perimeter must
- also be Fisurs l,{.3
checked and kept below an allowable stess. The
tota force W aue io press*e
in the tubesheet of Fig. l4.3is
C : perimeter of outer tubes, as defined in Fig. 14.3
W=PA d"= outside diameter of tube
The shear area A" through the outer perimeter is obtained
from Fig. 14.3 and is p= distance between tubes
e,= cr( -e) Example 14.1. A tubesheet for U-tube exchanger has a 12-in. diameter and is
subjected to a design pressure of 100 psi. If the tube layout is as shown in Fig.
Hence the shearing shess o ls expressed as
14.4 and S :17,000 psi, what is the required thickness? Assume the edge to
be simply supported.
w PA
A" Cr(l - d,/p) (14.2)
a= 0.8S
and
Similarly, the radial bending moment in the tubesheet is given by
a = radius of tubesheet
r4.9 THEORETTCAI ANArySts oF TUBESHEETS tN U_TUBE
EXCHANGERS
Fn
DX 1 2 3Or
More
o 4.OO 400
o.2 3.83 3a3
OA 3.69 3.70
o.6 359 3.60
o8 3.52 3.53
1.O 3.OO 3.43 3.46
F'sur6 la.5 (R€f. 2) Figure 1,t.6 (RcI. 2)
I)clining I4.3 THEORETICAT ANALYSIS OI TUSTSHETTS IN U.TUBI TXCHANGTRS 5l I
where D* is the modified flexural For simply supported tubesheets, the moment at the edge is not zero because the
rigidity of the tubesheet and ly' is the total
number of tubes. The differential erquation outer tubes have a bending moment that is transferred to the tubesheet. For this
of the bending ofa plate as given by
Eq. 7.7 becomes boundary condition, the value ofAl is given by
.20
.18
.16
74
12
.10
.oa
.ou I
""1 234567
.o2 |
rigurc 1,1.8 (ReI.2)
u .t , Or-U 6 7 8 9
" 10
Fisurs ra.; Equations 14.16 and 14.17 arc combined in a plot, as shown in Fig. 14.9.
Ger. 2l
*lY€ . 4 = coefficient obtained from Fig. 14.8. Example 14.2. Find the thickness of the tubesheet in Example 14.1 if
The interaction between the tubeshe"t
,
oy combining Eq. 14.6 with Il"
ttii"t n"r. _O tt e pressure is illustrated E* : 9.0 x 106 psi lt* : 0.3
= !a: Etvng
N= 88 Ir = O'0166
t r-zts T
- AA (14.16)
where
1a\
L l
^=ftztl=il4f.Nr,lt/t
E+ Iasl
Also Eq. 14.13 can be expressed
as
/l\=
\qo/ ^'
6F^U2n
or
5t2
ff: ar.utu (14.17) Fisurg 1,{.9 (Ref. 2)
drAr la srlR laulPMlNT
I4,4 BACKGROUNO OF THE ASMT DESIGN TQUATIONS FOR IUBCSHTETS 515
Solullon. tct ?.= 0.24 in. Then
(9.0 x
^* _ 12(1 106X0.24)r
_ 031) 11,390
U.:(a=18.78
T=THIcKNESS Or PERFORAIED PIAIE
From Fig. 14.7,
f. = 0.008 (conservative)
,=10--9'7s=0.r,
and from Eq. 14.14,
< 0.6
(6)(0.008)(100)/ 6
o_ Y (,6 o.s
0.2s \o.z+) > o.4
o= 12,000 psi OK
I H o.s
UI
r4.4_-.BACKGROUND OF THE-li_t4E
DESTGN EQUATTONS FOR
TUBESHEETS IN U-TUBE EXCHANGERS
, = T2 P ,".
(14.18)
",e.J )t2 a2 )t'rlo'" '
where f = 6F^
c,=+s
r, : otl(f)
110
(14.19a)
6 HIAT TRANSITR IQUIPMINT I4.4 BACKOROUND OT THT ASME DISION TQUATIONS FOR TUBESHETTS 517
6.00
4.00
3.00
-0.1
\
2.OO
\
SIII'AFE P|ICII ROTATED SOI'ARE PITCH
T-THICX ESS OF PERFORATED PLATE 1.00
0.80
1.O
0.60
09 0.50
0.40
o8
0.30
o:l C6
2 0.20
o.6
2
o
o 05
OA 0.r0
0.04
uI o3
0.06
a2 0.05
0.04
o.l
0.03
oo rtl
o.2 0:i o4 05 05 oa o.o2
LGAmENT EFFrcrENcy , - PFd'
SQTJAFE PITCH
Fisure l4.l I (Ref. 3)
o.2 0.3 0.40.s 0.6 0.8 1.0 2.O 3.0 4.0 5.0
T/ c^
Expressing Triangular pitch
Figvre 14.12 (Coud6s), ot ihe Amsricon Sociaty of Mechonicol Engineers.)
D
K' F4. 14.19a becomes
a
G
a ,: of rlZ,,
(l4. r9b)
and
where /* is obtained from Figs. 14.14 and 14.15.
li'
"r*:
Example 14.3. Determine the thickness of the tubesheet of Example 14.2
2K' using ASME's Eq. 14.l9b.
t tl IAT TTANIIII IOUIPMINT
I4.5 THEORETICAT ANATYSIS OF FIXCD TUBESHEETS 519
(
;; \,
t 66
,) FfiF (/
2AAeA
I*AE / er=6o"
ile\
\7 \
SOUARL
P]TCH
ROIATTD SOUARI
P TCH
TRIANGUTAR
PlTCH
(.Ya K: bA
Fisur. l,l,l/a Fis'rra l,(.15
(Court sy of th6 Am6ricon Soci€ty oI ntechoni.ol Enginsers.)
The shess analysis of fixed tubesheets in heat exchangers is very complex due
to the large number of variables that affect the analysis such as difference in tube
and shell strain, the ratio of shell and tubeshe€t stiffnesses, effective applied
pressure, and relative thermal expansion of shell and tubes. The development of
Tlar the simplified TEMA design equations for determining fixed tubesheet tlickness
SOUARE PIrcH is based parfly on the theoretical work done by Gardnel'5 and Miller.6 From Eq.
Figure l,l.l3 (Court .y ot rh€ Arn.ricon So<ie, of riG.honicol Engin.er3) 7.9 the differential equation for the bending of circular plate is given by
f+ : o.sz Q:Cz'rKlm-2w)
From Eq. l4.l9b with G - 3.0, where g: local pressure
C2 = constant
r = 3.0(0.s2) (0.25X17,000) Nt(d!;-t)Er
Kr = tube bundle stiffness =
= O.2A in. I R = bolt circle
!20 HIAT IRANSFIR TQUIPMENT I4.5 THIORTTICAL ANATYSIS OT FIXTD TUSESHEETS 521
:
L lcngth ol tubcs l'he valuc ol C2 can then be deternlinctl liorn this cqualittn as
where qo :
local pressure at radius a.
*ffi*2,'fi-*#*,ff**oo=o Then from Eqs. 14.20b and 14.21,
Z,(x.),,
where
^
-,
,a =--
x. Zz@.) h6) - " (r4.24)
2 zi&"\
, = (4\*
*,/ (r) = Br
'1-IJ'-"'" zl?.)
\D
and and from Eqs. I 4.20e and 14.2Of
q=C2[27@)+HZ2@)] zl(x)
(r4.20b)
H=-
. =
ffiV,<ol - Z1@) + HLzze) - z+(x)l| (14.20c) ZL@.)
(14.26')
e=ffifzX,l+Hz!(x)l (14.zod)
The value of 11 is based on the edge condition of the tubesheet. For fixed
: 4:
{1", . (*)'r-,1 -,f,,<,t - (*1,*111
tubesheet, 0 and Eq. 14.26 gives
", ft
(14.20e) ,=-t# for fixed tubesheets (14.27)
whcre the Z functions are as defined in
Chapter 7 and C and II are consranm to :
be det^ermined from the boundary condidons. Similarly, for simply supported tubesheet M" O and E9. 14.25 becomes
Definrng P as the average pressure acdng
on the fubesheet, its total value is
[zzb) + l0 -
,.. = -\ffi] ttt/x"Vt,- r\ simply supported hrhesheets
, =
# I"
*o * = r,z&)lt - rffi] (14.21)
"t 04.28\
i|IAI IiAII'IIR IQUIPMINT
=T (1)'" (14.30)
"
For large values of -r, the Z val.uls can
be approximated by those gtven in
Table 7.1 and rhe quantities Fo and F^."n
u"
"' "'"
"ili..r"J ^i
I
F=
7{l + t/-X.l for fixed tubesheets 1234567A9
t/i (14.3 t)
Fieur€ 14.16
F^ =
=-:
IX"
I"rom Fig. 14.16, F. = 0.059 and T : 0.25. From Eq. 14.30,
and
,+P(ort)ro o'nr
F :
;O 2\/-2x)
+ for simply supported tubesheets ":
(14.32) a : 20,390 psi I
F- -,-n/4
''' 2x"
I4.6 TEMA FIXED TUBESHEET DESIGN
Example 14.4. Determine the stoess at the edge of a fixed Development of the TEMA simplified equations are based on Eq. 14.23 and can
tubesheet of thick_
? = 0.50 in. if the eeometry L u, ,to*n?
ness
lb/in.3. E* = 9 x 106 psr, p*
n!:'il;;?:
p = icrii-pri. = 52,800 generdly$e<fi.r'idedinto.thraseparateieps-..The first is determining an equiv-
=-0..1. -a alent local pressure on any given tube. The second step is establishing an
equivalent general pressure on an equivalent tubesheet. The third is incorpo-
Solution
rating the first two steps into the differential equation of the tubesheet that is
considered as a plate on elastic foundation. These three steps discussed in the
D.=q;#H#=103,020 next three sections are based on th work of Gardner. ? The notations used are the
same as those given by TEMA.I
o = (^\r'_ x 52.800\o,s
-\/2 ro3"oro-/ I4.6.1. locol Equivoleni Pressure
"-\o-) =I'0062
xa: 9(6) = 6.037 One of the main assumptions made by TEMA in the analysis of tubesheets is that
the tubes are uniformly distributed tbroughout the tubesheet. Referring to Fig.
524 HIAT TNANS;ER IOUIPI,ITNT 14.6 TTMA FIXED TUBESHITT DESION
Similarly, the total force 4 in one tube due to shellside pressure P, is expressed
n = nAf' (14.33)
where A = ra2/N
a : inside radius of tubesheet o:*l#-ry1=*+l'-i(*il
4 = outside diameter of tubes
4= force in tube due to pressure ,q acdng on face of tubesheet 4: nAf, (14.34)
4: shellside pressure
Besides forces 4 and force F" also acts on the tubes of Fig. 14.3 that
4 a third
is caused by such factors as thermal stresses, restraint due to other tubesheet, or
other unbalanced forces in the heat exchanger. This force is expressed as
'ti_il ||ttttPs F*= nt(d. -
li
wrl
t)on ( r4.3s)
Actual Contiguration The total summation of Eqs. 14.33,14-34, and 14.35 is equal to an assumed
equivalent force q acting on an equivalent tubesheet of radius r. Hence,
4na2
N
= E- n+ F* (14.36\
or
s=@f,-u)+\u,-ttot, (t4.37)
T"^I1r",9t ** Eq. 14.39 can be.obtained Fig. 14.18. The strain of 14.6.2 Generol Equivolent Pressure
tube at a distance r fromthe centerline .r ,r,. lrom
r,."i i_ir,_g". i,j*L*"o
a
Wp = ra'P (r4.43)
Because W|, is not necessarily equal to w', the unbalanced force transmitted
through the shell is
W: 1ra'(n - P) (14.44)
w (14.4s)
Figur6 14.18
nt!(Do - ts)
.,.,6r$g.t,.rr:t,r^tr1rtii4t;ti.
14.6 ilMA flxlD luBllllllr DttloN lt9
Flnally, the value of €,r can be written as
+ = ^! - (4,47)
",e,
whcre d" : coefficient of thermal expansion in shell
AZ, = change in shell lengtrh
4 = temPerature change in shell
And the value of 4", is
*,=o#* (14.48)
Substituting Eqs. 14.44, 14.46, 14.47 , and 14.48 into Eq. 14.45 gives
ot=*o.m-ee;ln (14.49)
Equation 14.49 has two unknowns, Atr" and P. It is also based on Eq' 14.47
which does not take into consideration the strain due to an expansion joint.
When the dhell has an expansion joint, E4. 14.47 must be modified accord-
ingly. In Fig. 14.20a the expansionjoint can be approximated as shown. The flat
FigurE l,t.l9 plite aD in Fig. 14.?-Ob is assumed fixed at points a and b' The total deflection
of the shell is given by
where D, - outside diameter of shell LL"= 1" + La"Q * 6 (14.s0)
= thickness of shell
r"
where 6 = deflection of expansion joint.
ob = longitudinal stress in shell
The expansion joint deflection 6 can be expressed in terms of two components
as
and the longitudinal snain is given by
6=t"+6, (14.51)
,*=!6r- 1",o*'1 (r4.46)
where 6. : deflection due to mechanical load
where d, : modulus of elasticity of shell 6p = deflection due to pressure load
e6 = longitudinal sfrain of.shell Furthermore, the deflection due to mechanical load 6, can be written as
ratio of shell
" = Iroisson's
tr
Fisur. 14.21
s
2n=Lyra-!(w+w+wet)t3
8 EIi 3 EjIi - lMol"
2 EIr
(r4.54)
+w)lz +MoI
"' :!w,il2
e -L(w+w"
6 EiL 2 EiIi Ey'i
(14.55)
Tho TEMA design equation for fixed tubesheets is based on F4s. 14.23,14.41,
I 2nl3 rnd 14.49. At r : 4 it is assumed that the quantity 2w in Eq. 14.41 is negligible.
ISj r2Ey'i Substituting Eq. 14.23 into Eq. 14.41 and equating the latter with Eq. 14.49
. tlsult,in the following expression:
P=Pr'-P!+Pa (14.60)
^' = 968,L"
,); (r4.57)
2n(D1 - D")3
P
r4'4' 14'48' 14 sc and the expressions ror Pi =
xrolr + 0.,UK(l.s
+/)l
.t:ii:tflTri HL w* afr woi +
:T*n{o.*lrsp*
-t I + r(r.5 +/r]
+=ffi_w*,,," ":
_(:)(j#)1,.,ffi])
* P) +
$1",<n - rt"(Do - ,sa + - Dhp"] o _ un,r, (o--rt'fu!__g!f\
[<o?
'- 1p"- a\ u )\-r+.nq /
This equation can be simplifed by letting .. E,t,(D" - t)
n=Effi@" 1s
I
Ir+"@"-t"t*t"1 Fe:0.2s+ tr - o.ol1e%&(ql]'A
J LZ4J (14.58)
E modulus of elasticity of tubesheet material
=
Hence,
"'
=t*4{o'*Irr's + K(1'5 +Dr (+)('"5)t
,,-(#+)(w\
the stress in the tubesheet of the heat
3:Httf exchanger
"ti..L.iftrlate rrzo-*boruees
E : n x ld psi for tubesheet material on'lt"tnntout-lR pttct-t.
and shell
d" = 0.5 x 10-6 in./in."F
Iength of tubes = 144 in.
thickness of tubes = 0.065 fu.
f (assurne a simply supported
plare)
.= !,ZS
tubeside plessule = 75 psi (b)
concruTent shellside pressure
= 15 osi tigor'11.22
E, = 30 x 106 psi
d, = 6.5 x 10-6 in./in.gF From Se.tion 14.6.3
operating temperature of shell
= l87T Q7 x rO\(O.2s)(36 - 0.25) = 2N.73
operating tempexature of tubes
= ll9? K: (27 x 101(0.06s)(0.75 - 0.06s)
ambient temperature 70.F :
Solution. From Eq. 14.57
Fq = o 2s + (, 2s _, .,|#_qa#ft#% (#;l]'"
of Fq : l '8752
a _ O6)Q7
"i -
x 106X0.1698)
= 165,300 lb/in.
t:t-i(*, 1
-@Xlxl?l)47=6t-- rr2o I 0.75 - 2 x 0.065
j =, * s(ry?E#H:1]q =l- +\ ,l 35.5
= 32 85
: 0.9146
OI
J= 0.0304
= 0.8750
!36 HIAT TRANSfTN IQUIPMfNT
NOMENCTATURE
llcncc,
/r'\
1 + (0.0304X200. 73)(1.87 s'
7-)
Itll\:r-=
x [1 + 0.4(0.0304)(200.73)(l.s + 0.9146'
FLANOED 1I FLUED EXPANSION JOIN'I
/f,
=_ ""'
16 RO?7r
'
12.4428.-
: n.lnn
41.55
15
ilil||tl
___-/uuu\F._______
1 + (0.0304x200.73)(1.s7 s' l-.-------1
t s + 200.73(1.5+ 0.s75)l
EELLOWS EXPANSION JOINT
Fisur€ 1,t.23
{o.oro.orooltr.
_ rr.0 - 9.0304)/ot,; ll r,).I
\ 2 /\ 3s.52 lJ I4.7 EXPANSION JOINTS
l5 'fhe two most common types of expansion joints are the flanged-and-flued and
= nTarr<s.trst - 0.36s0)
the bellows, shown in Fig. 14.23. The flanged-and-flued expansion joints are
= 6.57 used where the deflection between the tubes and the shell is not very large. The
most frequently used method of analysis is that of Kopp and Sayre.E It treats the
joint as an equivalent rectangular structural frame with some modifications to
account for the inside and outside radii. Many experimental investigations have
x [9.5 x
been performed to verify Kopp and Sayre's method. The results have shown that
10 6(187 - 70) - (6.5 x 10-6)(119 _ 70) tbr most applications this method is satisfactory.
12.4428 Bellows are used for large deformations of the shell. The analysis based on
= 1.48 a NASA researche is similar to that of Kopp and Sayre in that the bellows are
treated as a structural frame with hoop stresses resisted by rings or equivalent
From Eq. 14.58 plate-and-shell segments of the bellows. A frequently used standard in the
united states is that of EJMA.I0
P=41.55-6.57+1.48
= 36.46 NOMENCTATURE
From Eq. 14.I
a = radius of tubesheet
. F2G2 P b = G/2
47" D. : outside diameier of tube
(1.2r2Q5.r2 36.46 F : modulus of elasticity of shell
4
E,r : modulus of elasticity of tube
: 8686 psi OK t G = diameter of tubesheet
530 HIAI TRANSTTR IQUIP/IITNI
BIBLIOGRAPHY 539
/I, i: poisroo's r.ittio ol tubcshcct ntatcrial (r. Milfcr, K. A. G., "fhc Dcsign of l'ubc Pla(cs in Hc.rl Exchrngcrs," in l'r(!$ut? V(tii,l Ml
/r* : poisson's ratio of perforated plate P4ing Design Colletted Pape^ 1927 1959, Amcrican Socicty ol Mcchanical lirgirrccrs,
1960, p. 6'72.
o = allowable bending stress 7, Mcmo from G- P. Byme, Jr., Secretary ofthe Tubular Exchanger Manufacturcrs Associatk)n
to Members of the Technical Commiftee, dated January 3, 1964 regarding Standards Back-
K' = b/a ground Data prepared by Karl Gardner.
M, = radial bending moment in a tubesheet 8. Kopp, S. and M. F. Sayre, "Expansion Joints fo. Heat Exchangers," Contributed by the Heat
Transfer Division and presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Mechan-
Mr = tangentizl bending moment in a tubesheet ical Engitreers, New York, November 27th, 1950.
't. Analysis of Stresses in Bellorrs, Design Criteria and Test Resubs, Part l, Atomics Inter-
N : number of tubes national Repon NAA-SR-4527.
P = pressure 10, Standads of the Exponsion Joint Manufacturers Association,4th ed., Expansion Joint
Manufacturers Association, New York, l9?5.
P, = shell side pressure
4 = tubeside pressure BIBTIOGRAPHY
p = rube pitch
: Rubin, F. L., "What's lhe Difference Between TEMA Exchatrger Cl^sses,"? Hydroca/bon Prc-
g local pressure ce$in8, June 1980.
J = ASME allowable tensile stess Rubin, F. L. and N. R. Gainsboro, "Latest TEMA Standards for Shell-and-Tube Exchangers,"
Chemical Engineering, September 24, 1979.
Z = thickness of tubesheet Yokell, S., "Heat-Exchanger Tube-to-Tubesheet Connections," Cr"nical Engineering, Feh aty
8, 1982.
t = thickness
t" = thickness of shell
t, = thickness of tube
a" = coefficient of thermal expansion of shell
a, = coefficient of thermal expansion of tubes
n =(p-d)/d.
REFERENCES
This chapter presents some design aspects of solid and layered vessels with
pressures in the range of 10,000 to 100,000 psi and higher. In these high
pressures prestressing, or autofrettaging, becomes an important consideration in
the design.
It was shown in Eq. 8.1 that
PR.
t=. sE ,,,
- 0.6P
is the design equation for vessel shells. As the quantity (,SE - 0.6P) approaches
zero, the thickness approaches infinity. In other words, as the pressure increases,
the allowable stress of the shell material must be increased higher than 607o of
the design pressure for the equation to be valid. This increase in allowable stress
requires materials of high tensile and yield properties. The limitations ofEq. 8.1
for high pressures are usually overcome by using a different equation that is
based on the theory of plasticity as discussed later in this chapter.
Equation 8. 1 is shown in Fig. 5.6 as being very similar to Lame's Eq. 5.9 for
thick vessels. Disregarding extemal pressures, Eqs. 5.9 and 5.10 become
A thick-woll loyercd vsss€t (Courres), of rhe Nooter corpororion, Sr. touis.)
/ ,2\ (1s.1)
o,=P'lt-41
r-l
\
540 ot = P'
541
512 vt33!13 foR HtoH PRtssulEs
r5.2 PRESTRESSTNG Ot WAU"S
whcrc
whcre W = strain energy
/,?\
P' = Pl ,!! "l t, : poisson's ratio
\r; - rfl E = modulus of elasticity
.
The shess distribution given by Eq. l5.l is
shown in Fig. 15. 1 for a vessel or, cz, 03 : principal shess
with rJ 11 = 2.2. The max-imum stress is in the
hoop direction and is at the inner
surface where r = ri. As the pressure is increased,
the stesses increase until bar stressed to the elastic limit in simple tension,
F-or a 02: a3 : 0 and the
they reach a maximum limiting stress where cncrgy of distortion expression becomes
rainre is assumJ ti oc-cur. r,o. trrin
vessels the ASME Code assrirnes that failure
occurs *f,"oG-ii"ra poin, l,
reached. This failure criterion is conveni*t
*a
sfess tleory. In thick vessels the crirerion usually""lf"i
t tir"'rni*iriut pnocipat
;p;Iil f;;;i" mareriats
w:--6-
0 I u\ol
is the energy of dislortion theory. This trr""q,
-combination .lt"Jil;i
tl,;lrrii.o"
in a body under any of sfesses begins only when""uor,the", lror a pressure vessel with the tbree principal stresses given by Eq. 15.1, the
TI,I)oi",
*oCy .I per unit volume absorbed at trrefiiit cnergy of distortion expression is
Sstorrion
^s:11 energy of distortion
stain
is Squar to tfre
absorbed per unit volume at any poi* in u
to the elastic limit under a state of.umaxral
i*
.,r"rr"O
+ De),
test. The equation that expresses this theory
i, giu"n iV--
"'* """,
stress as occurs in a simple t€nsion
-o (#
/t + p\",f ,'; .f1tY
* = \!t<r, - oz)2 * (sz - o), * (o3 - c1)21 (1s.2)
=
\- l \r;- ri/ \r/
Itecause Ws, : l4lr, the maximum pressure at which yield is assumed to occur at
the inner surface is given by
'.:($(T)Gl (15.3)
It is interesting to nole that when the axial strain is assumed to be zero, the
axial stress becomes
o1 : p,(21t)
rl - r?f ri , \r - 21t'fl-t/z
or
\/3 --l-Ll - 3 I (1s.4)
In most applications the difference between Eqs. 15.3 and 15.4 is negligible.
.L As the pressure in Eq. 15.3 is exceeded, the inner part of the shell becomes
plastic, whereas the outer part remains elastic, as illustrated in Fig. 15.2. The
Figu.e 15.t
derivation of the relationship between dle elastic and plastic regions is beyond
,4 vtt!!t! fot HtoH PnlssuRrs
15.2 PRESTRTSSTNG OF WAU.S 545
wlrrrc or, o,, a1 = hoop, radial, and longitudinal stress, respectively (psi)
or, = yield stress of material (psi)
Rrc,o, 't' r, = outside radius of shell (in.)
.," o'r"sr'c
ri : inside radius of shell (in.)
r= radius at any point in the shell (in.)
p= elastic-plastic interface radius (in.)
lklrution 15.7 may be used to determine the lower bound pressure P* at which
ytrl(ling occurs by letting p : 4. Hence
Fisurc 15.2
-2o" lnr
(+)H ('.!) \r5
(15.9)
@)6 (t -'4\
Itlxnmple 15.1. A pressure vessel with a solid wall has an 4 of 8 in., r, of
(15.5) l?.6 in., and o,, : 80,000 psi. Plot o6 and o, when P = P* and when P =
({).000 psi.
o, = ss+o(r. ,,-/!g\
@(5"*z'n!) \
*:trfl':H[X ?iween
the applied pressure and the elasric-plastic
interrace
o,=rsno(r -ry)
'l'hese two values are shown in Fig. 15.3.
:
#(' -4
f; - zr,L\
p/ (r5.7) From Eq. 15.7 with P = 60,ffi0 psi and o,
calculation gives p :
80,000 psi, a trial-and-error
11.50 in. Hence from Eq. t5 5
t46 Ytlstt3 foR HtoH PRISSUnES
I5,3 I.AYERED VESSEIS 547
Figlro'15.4
Solution. The maximum autofrettaging pressure of 60 ksi is less than fwice the
lower bound pressure P*. Accordingly, the stress distribution resulting from a
pressure drop of 60 ksi is in the elastic fange, as shown in Fig. 15.4. FromEq.
RaDrus , lNcH t5.1.
Fisurc 15.3
od ar P=45Ksl
c(
o
o
f
The earliest reference to layered vessels was made in the 1951 API-ASME
( bde. In later years when the API Standard and the ASME Code were separated,
'?iiLi;i* llre layered-vessel criterion was deleted from both. It was not until Jan'tary 1979
that layered vessels were included in the ASME Code. In establishing the new
Wodd War II the technology of building layered llyered-vessel rules, consideration was given to the state of the art as well as the
vessels has improved substan-
tialty..Today layered vesseJi are used ii'",i,ia"i"re" and research accumulated by the industry in the past 50 years. An
tions in the penochemical industry
;i[nfT"."ru." "iperience
c l ibrt was also made to provide rules to accommodate all types of known
as heat exchangers, "pp,,""-
ammonia conven€rs, autoclaves. and-such - reactors,
urea l:ryered-vessel construction.
coal gasificati;;
Layered vessels consist of a multitude of layers
,#il. Today most layered vessels are constructed in accordance with the ASME
wrapped tightly around an ('ode, VI[-1, Division 2. The majority of the design equations given in the code
inner shell to form a pressure-retarnlng envelope,
as shown in Fig. 15.6. The lor solid wall vessels are applicable to layered vessels. For fabrication, the
vent hole system is a safety feature incorporateainio
ttre iay"iJu"."sel o"_ ASME Code, VI[-1, Division 2, gives additional rules for layered-vessel con-
hon. It consists of a mulritude of small holes "on.t _a
drilled radiity lntoit fuy"., struction. One criterion for controlling wrapping tightness of layered shells is
extending from the ouiermost layer to and including "
tfr. i'uy", uj1'u""nt to tfr" rhat the area of any gap between two adjacent layers, as measured from the end
inner shell. The holes are sized and spaced so
that they do not affect the of a shell section, must not exceed the thickness of a layer expressed in square
structural integrity of the vessel. The venting
potential problems such as erosion and
,yrt"- uJt, u. u'rnonitor of inches. This is illustrated in Fig. 15.7.
at -ay oc"urln ti" inner rt
during the operation of the vesset. "orrosioritt Another criterion used occasionally to measure the tightness of layered shells
"tt is limiting the circumferential expansion of the outer layer during hydrostatic
Layered vessels are constructed by various
-
these methods is in the thickness of inoiuiaua
methods. The difference between testing to a value not less than one-half that ofan equivalent solid wall thickness'
Uyeri *.ap-piig !.-o""ou.", tlencJ the stress at the outer layer due to internal pressure P as given by Eqs.
In^ general, layered-vesset "nA
construction can be divided inro
I:l1ilg-r."ryiqy
three categories. The first is 5.9 and 5.10 is
the colcentric_ or spiral_wrapped method where
layers.consist of segments welded together the
i
in spiral ;;;;;;fashion to 2Prl
ItT ft::"guld ftickness, as shown in Fig. 15.6a andb. The second
method
co = --;--"--
r;- ri
is the shrink fit method wherebv layers ."'inOiuiOuutty for_"Jiito
and shrunk on each other to form thl reguired total ,r,t'L"*'ii]g.'is.orl.
"yfmO"r,
rr,"
C,=0
to. ft: coil-wrapped method whereby
ItlO a .rrti"u""r-J""t i. it ip i, *ounO Pr?
rn a spiral or helical fashion to form a cylinder
as in Fig. 15.4:' ' r;- ri
wtt|tt tot HtoH PR!33UR!3
15.3 t/aYIRED VISSILS 55t
'l'hc uctusl measurcd growth must not be less than one-half the value given by
l!. r5.10.
A third criterion for determining the maximum permissible gap in layered
rhclls is by relating the gap height to a given shess level. Referring to Fig. 15.8
End Eq. 5.12 and assuming the end to be fixed against rotation, it can be shown
lhd the gap /, can be related to the bending moment by the expressron
Mo
,F; (15. 11)
,:d+
e,' = 9.--DP'J into Eq. 15.1l gives
E(rz. - r?)
The circumferential growth can - O.55ro,
h= (1s.12)
be expressed as E
,
_ ,*,
=,#ii
-Ee=A-
Lt n-tr', defined as the mean radius. Then
11 =P--!
-2
,.=n"+|
and the circumferential growth
is given by
SERnt (15.10)
Figur6 15.8
5!2 V!!t!ts toR t{toH PRESSURIS
r 5.3 TAYTRED VESSfl.S 553
Equati0n 15.12 cannot be used directly becau-se
the quantity o, is not readily by
known. This. quantity, however, can be related llv('I
to un uiio*udr"-Jt uy
lating the principal stresses at a layer as ".. "ut"u. 1-n / o,.
K= I + --:--- - l:i--
,?(m - l) \JJ6
( 15. r 6)
oo: S + pab ')
a,= -P wlrcrc m : 3.0 for carbon steel
The maximum stress inrensiry o; is limited by the ASME Code, VIL[, Section 15. 18)
2, to 3S,. Or in general terms
",o+f,+"=#r. (
z^\-
'
o= o'ss/s"
E fN L
- 0.5 - :lJ..l ( 15.19)
(15.15)
^ where N = 25"/KS^
where & = alternating stress as defined in the ASME Code,
VIII, and K is : 3 for indefinite number of cycles
vtttttt tot HtoH PnrssuRES
r5.3 |AYERED VrSSfl.S
K=-+.,,"[**
& = maximum allowable alternating stress
S. = allowable stress
E = modulus of elasticity
r= radius where gap is measured
P : design pressure
Fisur€ 15.9
The total snain required to close one gap is obtained by substituting Eqs. 15.21 o,= -P
and 15.23 into 15.25, which gives
Hence the maximum stress inlensity is
where
A=l- 2+ h/Rl
'1*'1r, + + P < NS,
2(l-cosa+h/R) ri- ri r- lL-- e
=l----).
4: I r h (2 + h/R)(h/R)
and
Rr 2(l -cos d+h/R)
C: + h/R)(r - d + h/R)
y.=!d(rs. (15.28)
2(1 cos - (2 + h/R)(h/R)
A plot of Fq. 15.26 will show that the lines are a linear function of strain Example 15.4. The following gaps =)
were measured after forming a layered
versus /r/R1. Hence, the ASME Code, VItr, Division 2, approximated 84. 15.26 vessel of 11 = zl0 in. and rz = 55 in.
by the quantity
Gap lrngth Height At Radius
. < 0.r0er4) (rs.27) Determine if these gaps are acceptable 1f E = 3O x 106 psi, P = 6000 psi'
\/-/ /, = 0.3, S. = 20,000 psi, and N 3. :
Equation 15.27 calculates the strain needed to close any given gap. The total
stain required to close all the gaps is determined by summiig all -the individual Solutian. Frcm 84. 15.27 ,
shains given by Eq. 15.27. The hoop stress in a layir due o all accumulated gap
stains is approximated by .,:o.loefi# =2.33x10-6
6(o o09t
eo =9 1"^ UYJJII = 2. l0 x tO-o whcrc r/, : radial dellection of layer l, shown in Fig. 15.7, duc to intcrlacc
pressure ffa1
rotal€=10.30x10,6
d. = radial deflection of all layers beneath layer i due to interlacc
From Eq. 15.28, pressure fl11
-;t
| - u2/ ,.?D \
("t - f+,) = rr,. *-,r,- (, x 2o.ooo - H#)
Substituting Eq. 15.30 into Eq. 15.31 gives
NS
a.-4,: ( 1s.32)
= 1O.47 x 10-6 Z
ff:"iffilr:'"X.ll,ii,X#ill1ffi:J.T
r \n,t,-ni-,-"''/ (1s.34)
;i Substituting Eqs. 15.33 and 15.34 into Eq. 15.32 and reananging
s=kw (Is.29) yields
where s = transverse shrintage rn welds
^ nsE ____lRL
(Ri. | - RiXR:-2 - Rr'?- r)
ft = coefficient of transverse shrinkase ,i-,: 4.IrRr-j _ R?) (1s.35)
,ns
2t (15.30)
o' =
nkwE (RIt
v'nR'n-'
- 4.iR!*z -
lRi'z - Ri)
R!.)
(rs.37) * = -\t/- **)
R?\
4
4*rR?-'
- Ril:E
Stress in the layers below I due to welding i is Itxample 15.5. Determine the wrapping stress in the-vessel shown in Fig'
l5.11lf n =2,k=o.1',8= 30 x 106 psi, w = 0'375 in'
-i.,,Ri*r /. *;,7
R?\
Solution. From Eq. 15.37, stress in layer one due to wrapping of layer one is
"'= il:;r-1t
Stress in any layer due to welding other layers around it is
= 8733 psi
,,= {\ 1R?,,-nl
- -(t\ * x'/ r !-,Ri,. (r5.38)
Stress in layer two due to wrapping of layer two is
Substituting Eqs. 15.29 and 15.35 inio Eq. 15.3g resulrs
in 2.25 x tO6 - 2r\(21.52 -
or:4igffi@ (21'z 21'z\
n-r=#
and the total sbess in the outer layer is
E = modulus of elasticity
BIBTIOGRAPHY
e = circumferential growth
h = gap Armstrong, W. P., and M. H. Jawad, "Evaluation of Thermal Conductivity in Layercd Vessels,"
ASME Jounal Prcssure Vessel Technology, November 1981.
K = weld shrinkage Brownell, L. W., 8trd E, H. \onnl, Process Equipme t Deiqn, John Wiley, New York, 1959.
Jawad, M. H., "Wrapping Stress and lts Effect on Strenglh of Concentrically Formed Plywalls,"
Mo = longitudinal bending rnoment
NME Publication 72-pvp-7, Seprcmber l9?2.
n = number of seams in a layer Prager, W., andP. G. Hodge, Theory of Perfectb Pkstic Sortrb, John Wiley, l'{e\t York, 1 5.
P = pressure
CHAPTER t6
TALL VESSELS
564 565
566 TAtt vtssfl.s
16.2 IARTHQUAKI LOADING 567
for a specific vessel, may be a worse combination than any V : ZIKCSW (16.1)
^t;*:::::,b,:l!:y:
or me condltons listed above. The designer must be certain
that all conditions
aretxamined for determining the controlling condition. where Z = coefficient depending upon the earthquake for the location of
The required thicknesses and other desigi requirements vary
somewhat de_ installation. For ANSI A58. I for zone O' Z = | /8 ' For both the
pending upon the design theory chosen. Thi .*i-u,
,o".r ,fi.o* is used for UBC and the ANSI 458.1, the following apply: for zone 1'
Ine oeslgn ot most tall vessels. This theory is used in Z= 3 /16 for zone 2, Z : 3/8; for zone 3, Z : 3/4; and for
the ASME Code. VI[_I,
and the API 620t and 6502 design rules. Tie effects
of using other theori"s a.e zone 4. Z: 1.0.
discussed later.
Iv = total dead load of vessel and contents above plane being consid-
The two-external loadings that are important in the design
are those due to ered 0b)
e:mnquake toadrngs and wind loadings. AJthough the ASME
Code, VI[_ | , does
not specify design methods or design codes th-at are considered,
application of I: importance factor; assume I= 1'0 for vessel
zn t;n"
^' 3.52 (16.2)
\ EI,s
Substituting I = 386.4 in./sec2 gives
r = o.osos.g. (16.3)
When KCS = 0.3 is substituted into @. 16.1, the total lateral earthquake
force becomes
V= O.3O Zw (16.4)
When the vessel is rnade from shell sections with different dianieters and
thicknesses, the lateral earthquake force is determined for each cylindrical shell
section above the plane being examined. However, for a cylindrical shell of
uniform diameoer and thickness, the total lateral earthquake force V is distributed
as follows:
s68
570 lAt I vrlslt 3
I6.2 EARTHQUAKETOADINO 571
-f
Ongg A9 values of d and .{ are determined and
the moment arms to the
respective forces are known, the overtuming moment
is determinel as
v = zIKCSw
Z = earthquake factor depending upon site location. Boston is located in I
earthquake zone 2
where Z = 3/8
-+
I
1= 1.0
K=2.0
W = total dead load of vessel and contents is
shell weight = n(30.52 - 30\(360)(490/1728): g7gs16
weight of heads = (4/3)n(30.53 _ 3O?)(4gO/ |TZS\: 1630 lb Figure 16.2 Eonlquoks lood distribulion on o toll vos!€|.
312 tAtt vrlstts 16.3 WIND IOADING 573
v = (3/s)(t)(0.28)(34,24o) _ 3600 tb Two distinctly different kinds of design considerations are generated from wind
Ioading. First, the static force from the wind-loading pressure against the vessel
4 = 0 when ? is less than 0.7 (T :0.1006). Therefore, V ou".to-ing moment that must be considered in designing tall vessels
4=0. I = 3600 lb and "our"a'-
installed in the vertic-al position' The second consideration is the dynamic effect
from vorlex shedding of wind passing arcund the vessel'
Example 16.2. The tall vessel described
in Example 16.l is to be supported
at the lower head-to-shell iunction. 16.3.1 Externol Forces from Wind Looding
Dete-rmin" ,fr" i"""".frg'iro-"n,
- -'i-'i''|b 'n
support line from the lateril earthquake
forces.
u, *"
As with earthquake loading, many different design lnocedures determine the
Sotution. previous calculations show that the period of vibration places wind loading and its applica:tion to i vessel. The two most widely used standards
&e horizontal earthquake force to-be all of
applie; ;t;r-""',,#;;i#loaoing. are the ANSI A58.1 Code and the Uniform Building Code'
For
the vessel in Example 16.1, this grves Although there are differences in tle procedure for determinilg the wind
loads betieen the ANSI A58'1 Code and the Uniform Building code' both
M" = (3600)(20 x methods use the same rnap for determining the wind velocity at the location
site'
rZ) = 864,000 in.{b I Building Code'
as shown in Fig. 16.3 for the Uniform
Problems When the ailst A58.1 Code is used, the basic equation for determining the
velocity pressure q, at various heights z is calculated from
16.1 What is the total lateral earthquake force
using the ANSI A5g.l Code for
the following vessel? A vertiial vess"t
*irh ;-;;;l;;.il-o.on"o o, q" = 0.OO256 K,(tv)2 (a)
lower head. The shell is a seaml"r, pip" *"
in. thick,.and 40 ft. long wirh 3_in.-ih'i.k
*i;h ;_i;: inrialtii.am","., ,.0
pressure (Psf)
ri;;;J#;. rd"uJrlr"r where q, = veloclty
gas at ambient temperature.
The vesset is instJleJin "ont"tn. importance factor; assume 1 = 1'0
4 where Z = l.O. --.*mqo"k" ,on" =
1
y= design wind velocity (mph) from Fig' 16'3
Answer: Lateral earthquake force is 3910 lb. : veloc8
K, Pressure coefficient
16.2 Consider the exact same vessel given
in problem 16.1. What is &e total In addition, it is necessary to modify Eq.a by the force coefficient C1' which is
lateral earthquake force using tri'"
u.ii"""-i",rar"!'C"iJ.ll"r, 0.6 for a cylinder, and by the gust factor G, for the height of the vessel above
-basic
ground bv!I. Once the wind speed is determined from Fig' 16'3' ttte
Ansu,er: Latel-3l earthquake force is 4970
lb; ielocity pressure for a cylinder is obtained from Table 16' 1a' To determine the
16.3 WlNo toADlNG 515
Tqble l6'lo velocitv Pressure for cylinder' (q x Q) ucing ANSI A58'l codr'
P"t
|il|
:F E €I
'E 5 *,J l40-200 12 16 20 25 30 36 42
_i 200-300 14 18 23 2E 34 41 48
i- F! E 5?
r-, ,!aA
gi >
=:! trr 100-400 15 20 26 31 38 45 s2
| :at
q
i*i 95
5 E +l
; a:- i E6' FT
eE I E::E €F
i!;
rb8 frE; ; $
*8i iEF sE tlesign wind pressurep, the velocity pressure is modified by G, from Table
16' 1b
'-9 i
I!t *EFE
: p:
9rE I
=:a
li
uccordins to
tr gEg
Ei=s
::5 b5
i:
-E€
p=(qxc)(G) ( 16.8)
(16.9)
P = C,C"q'l
Height above
ground (ft) 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 '10 80 90
Gust factor 1.32 1.29 1.27 1.26 1.23 1.21 1.20 1.19 1.18 1.17
Height above
ground (ft) 100 Dn AO 160 180 2N 250 300 350 /100
Gust factor 1.16 1.15 1.14 1.13 1.12 1.11 1.10 1.09 1.08 1.07
574
T t"t wtl .l
16.3 WIND LOADING 577
Tqblc 16.2 Derign Wind Pressure pfor o Cylinder Uslng the Unlform Bulldlng
€odo (psf)
lrss than 20 t2 l6 20 z) 30 36 42
;10-40 t4 18 22 27 38 .to
40..{0 16 20 25 31 37 44 53
l,{l -10O t'7 22 n 33 40 47 JO
t(x) 150 t9 u 30 45 53 63
110-200 20 26 32 ,10 47 56 6't
t(x) 300 22 29 35 44 52 62 '14
Ituilding Code are different from those given in the ANSI standard. A typical
rlistribution of wind loads at various elevations for a tall vessel is shown in Fig.
I t6.4.
-f
I 16.3.2 Dynomic Anolysis from Wind Effecfs
When a laminar wind flows by a circular pressure vessel, the air stream or wake
bchind the vessel is no longer smooth. There is a region of pressure instability
in which vortices are shed in a regular pattem. These vorlices cause an alternat-
ing force perpendicular to the wind direction that could make the vessel vibrate.
When the frequency of the vortex shedding coincides with the natural frequency
ol the vessel, a resonance is caused with increasing amplitude. To prevent this
Figrrr. 16.,t Wind lood disiriburion on o rollwr!€|. condition, the natural frequency of the vessel is set higher than the vortex
slrcdding frequency determined by the maximum velocity of laminar wind at the
vcssel location.5 Resonant wind velocity is related to the heighfto-diameter ratio
where p = design wind pressure (psf) ol a cylindrical vessel, as shown in Fig. 16.5.
C" = coefficient for combined height, exposure, The natural frequency of the vessel/, is greater than the frequency of vortex
and gust sheddingJ, using the following equations:
Cq = pressue factor = 0.g for cylinders
I
4, = wind stagnation pressure at 30-ft level (16.10)
f, = i = natural frequency of vessel (cps)
1 = importance factor = 1.0 for pressure
vessel
f,^= -t;
o.2v
The Uniform Building Code basic. wind = frequency of vortex shedding (cps) (16.1 1)
speed map is shown in Fig. 16.3.
*._dg::rry_p for a cylinder for vari9";r,!r!itz"i", The
1"11T
rs glven in Table 16.2. Aeain- there tn" grouoo 1 = period of vibration from Eq. 16.3
"ilou?jesign
may be sevlral aifferent
pressure Ioads for different-height winC
zones. The height zones for the Uniform I{ = maximum velocity of laminar wind or resonant
velocity (fVsec), (see Fig. 16.5)
rAu. vlll .l
16.3 W|NO LOADINO
110
Solution, The UBC map shows that Corpus Christi, Texas, is located in a
.8.
100-mph wind zone. Therefore, the wind forces at various locations are calcu-
100 lated usins Table 16.2 as follows:
3
90
.s
!
E 0-30 ft ri = Qs)(2o)(62/12) = 2,580 lb
=
;l Upper
-- Head
Total
\r?r,
470 lb
15,860 lb I
Exampte 16,4.
What is the overtuming moment due to the lateral wind forces
assuming that the vessel is supported at the lower shell-to-head junction for the
vessel in Example 16.3?
12 t4 16 la 20 E--24---i
Height to diameter rario, ltD Solution
Figl|rre t6.5 Relononr wind velocir,, V,, v€rcus
H/D.
Load Arm
D= outside diameter of vessel (ft) 0-20 ft x 10 = 25,800 ft-lb
2,580
2040 ft x 30 : 83,700 ft-lb
2,790
f,>L (16.12) 3,2N x 50 = 160,000 ft-lb
4}-ffi ft
In addition to the vorrex sheddins. 6,820 x 80 = 545,600 ftlb
60-100 ft
Upper head 470 x 101* : 47,470 ft-lb
y,:.:.1 is examined for ovalling vrbration
as a dng. The ovalling frequenc-v l" at least twice the vonei shedding
frequeniyf, Mo : 862,570 ft-lb a
",i"s;;i;itil;;:,fi#11,f
Example 16.5. Determine if the vessel described in Example 16.3 is adequate
f' = # = ovalling frequency (cps)
(16.13) to resist vortex shedding and ovalling vibration.
r = nominal thickness of shell (in.)
Solution
H 000x12) I6.4
D= ii; = te.3s VESSET UNDER INTERNAL PRESSURE ONLY
V : 40.33 ftlsec l,or tall vessel under internal pressure only, the primary additional consid-
F|rli(nr to the intemal pressure is the effect of fluid pressure head and the dead
_(0.2)(40.331 ['rrl. 'lhis is especially important at the bottom of a vessel where the effects may
D - --51? = I.56cps
'"s =0.2V r rrrubine. The fluid pressure head may occur only during hydrostatic testing of
lh{' vcssel or it may be a continuing load occurring during operation ofthe vessel,
f, > f, 1.65 > 1.56 oK lh' additional pressure caused by the ffuid head is calculated as follows:
- 683(1)
J. = .o;i = 25.55 cps
(16.ls)
f' > 2k 25.55 > 3.12 oK ",=W
Problems wlrt lc PJ = additional internal pressure effect from fluid pressure head (psi)
Il = height of fluid column above point (ft)
16.5 A tall vessel conshucted with a- cylindrical
to be installed near Denver, Coloiado.
shell and flat closure ends i8
7 : density of fluid. lb/ftl
Th" ffi;;#;;.or tlre cyfin_
drical shell is 8 ft, the nominal
length from head weld seam b head
*rl.rhi"k;;j, i.6't.l'Joo ,r," ,o"igr,, |l the fluid head exists in the vessel during operation, the value ofP7is added
are 6.0-in. nominal thickness.
*aJl""- i, izJ n.-rir" nut t"ua, t' lhe intemal pressure when the minimum required thicknesses are set. At the
Wt at is tf,e totA fa*J*ioO '
design of the vesset fouowing rh"
*d;irh";;i;rltili io."" u."O fo. lr(,ttom of tlte vessel, the stresses and minimum required thickness are set by the
tirtrl pressure. It may be possible to decrease the thickness when the fluid head
Answer: ""a"r rllcct is decreased in a vessel where a variation in plate thicknesses is accept-
Lateral wind force = 14,060 lb. rrblc.
16.6 What is the total lateral wi * the vessel given in hoblem 16'5
If the fluid head exists in the vessel only during the hydrostatic testing, the
using the Uniform Buildinf,%tff; plirnary membrane stress frorn the combination of the hydrostatic test pressure
rrrrtl the fluid head pressure may go as high as the yield strength of the vessel
Ansu'er: Laterul wind force t|r terial at the 0est temperature. However, if the resulting minimum required
= 21,100 lb.
tlrickness from the combination is indicated as more than that thickness required
16'7 Many_design specifications requirea-minimum lrrr the normal design conditions, substitution of a pneumatic iest or a combina-
design wind speed of r00
mph. What is the total lateral^wlnd torce tion of hydrostatic/pneumatic test should be considered. In general, the min-
on the vessel in problem 16.5
based on a wind speed of 100 irnum required thickness of a vessel should never be set by the requirements of
mph?
thc hydrostatic head unless it is impossible to test it any other way. Also,
Answer: Lateral wind force rcrnember tJlat a hydrostatic test may use fluids other than water if water causes
= 21,390lb.
rr rrroblem such as corrosion.
..7 TAtl Vt!!!ts
16.4 VESSCL UNDTR INTTRNAI PRESSURT ONIY 583
F'or u vcssel untjcr intcrnal pres
. lrr hoth Eqs. 16.18 and 16.19, the dead load term may be either tension or
iffi:i;:lJ:,.:ji,# ffi #*'#liilT":lji
Whether the ,t .ir", ;iilliJi,l,,lj,
vslrcr uur
;ii il.;",l:ll,l
also lts weight to be consi( q'orrrpression depending upon the plane being examined. In general, above the
pressive sresses a"p""a,
"uur.J.Un",t-,w cause tensile or rrrpport line, this term is compressive and the total longitudinal stress is the
"r# ,ii:e
: locatton
-addttronal.loadings
of the extemal supports or s[
sKrn tocation. rllllcrence between the intemal pressure effect and the dead load effect. When
llris is below the support line, the terms are both tensile. For some arangements,
. In th€ actual design, the minin is initiallv set by
circumrerentiaLsnesi;ffi il thc condition without inlemal pressure may be more critical than when intemal
#l}1T3ffi:*|"**' prcssure is considered.
ll
.rr is positive, the actual stress is positive and the allowable stress is
or=PR
_ rlctcrmined from the allowable tensile stress tables. If the value of or is negative,
t (16.1
lht: allowable stress is determined by the method that establishes the maximum
From the equation rrllowable axial compressive stress in a cylindrical shell.
in IJG_Z7tct(l of the ASME code,
ter-s or sr', tte vltr-I, expressed
'e;;#;"i:') l{xample 16,6. For the vessel described in Example 16.1, determine the total
kngitudinal stress in the cylindrical shell above and below the support line that
sE=P(4+o' (r6.1 lN at the lower shell-to-head junction. The value of SE
: 15,000 psi.
where = allowable tensile shess (psi)
,S
,l{rrtttion. Assume the intemal pressure is set by Eq. 16.17 for a value of
E = weld joint efficiency (E
= I.0 for seamless)
Jr, = 15,000 psi. Reananging the terms gives
,PR w (lo.sls)
30_n"\
oL: 2x0.5 "'- I -
2t rD^t (16.18) +Q45)(
a(60.5X0.5)
wnere ot: tatal longitudinal sress (psi) ot: *730O - 110 psi
W= total dead load of ot = 7190 psi tension with intemal pressure
examined(rb).rhl,;.h:#X,,:?lf being
:*;r.TdLJr""" ot : ll0 psi compression without internal pressure
D" = mean diameter of shell (in.) _
211 * ,
'lhe dead load of vessel and contents below the support line is
From the equafion in uG_27(c\et.:lg:
rearranged and the dead VI[_ | , with rhe rerms
load term added, 1tM-E.-C"de,
the following equation is grven: Lower head 815
Shell fluid 20,620
,,=+p(!-o.z)t w Head fluid 2,290
\zr / rD^t (16.19)
23,725 tb
tta TAtt wr!![3
16.5 VESSEI. UNDER INTCRNAT PRISSUR€ AND EXTERNAI IOADINO 585
The longitudinal $tress usinS Eq.
16.19 is
16,12 What is the maximum longitudinal stress in the vessel in Problem 16.10
with and without considering the internal design pressure?
oy: + (245)l/ ;--30 - O.2l
\ oe:'<r
+ \'r'tzr)
\z ^u.r / r(60.5X0.5) Answersz ot = TllO psi tension with intemal pressure considered.
a1 : I 73C0 + 250 = 7550 psi tension with intemal pressure
ot: l7O psi compression without considering intemal
pressure.
Example l6J. For the vessel described in Example
16. 1, determine the
t;;*r;ivo'l.,jii'L,r"e,
l"TlT !Trftri".'tainingnuidat35rb/ft I6.5 VESSEL UNDER INTERNAL PRESSURE AND EXTERNAT TOADING
6t: lR \ w 4M.
For water P, = = 15.2 psi *P (t - or/ =i.,';fr (16.21)
As can be seen from this equation, many different combinations of stresses must
Problcms hc examined to obtain the maximum stress such as, with the first term equal to
zero when tlere is no internal pressure (vessel not operating), and with internal
16.10 What is rhe circumferential syss bgeO_o1_tfre pressure, with the second term either iension or compression, and with the third
ASME Code, VIII-I, at tcrm either tension or compression. There may be more combinations because
the bottom of a tall vessel rh"t contains
nuiC at sO tUTdJj an intemal
design pressure of 400 osi? .The. "#al'ta_eter
,"r."i; ;;:;. rhe value of W, the dead load, varies depending upon the location of the plane
uy lhat is being considered. Usually, the maximum stress is located at the support
0.5-in. minimum wan uv +s ft 0
heads on each end.
i".;;;;l ,."e,i,, *iii"i_il. n* line; however, when the vessel has various diameters, it may be necessary to
E = l.U and the vessel is supported at the ".*
bottom. cxamine stresses at different cross sections. This, of course, is not considering
any local stresses in the shell caused by the support.
Answer: c6 = 15,200 psi
16.11 What is the naximum shess in the Ilxampte 16,8. The vessel described in Example 16.l is to be supported at the
shell of the vessel in problem 16.10
during a standard hydrostatlc test Iower shell-to-head junction. What are the longitudinal stresses in the shell
of 1.5p?
above and below the support line? The intemal pressure is 225 psi.
Answer: o, : 22,700 psi Solutian. From Example 16.1, the dead load of the various components is
386 TAtr vlssEls I6.5 VESSET UNDER INTERNAI PRESSURE AND EXTERNAT I.OADING
=
;::: i:;::i: M. = (862,570)(12) 10,350,840 in'-lb
For.a tall vessel under external pressure only, in addition to the basic 10
1.0 2 3 4 56 810
consid. 0.1
erauons tor external pressure design given in Chapter g, the effect Length to diameter ratio {t/Da}
of fluid lo uniform extornol pr€ssuro
pressure and dead load is considered. This is very iimilar llsure 16.6 Numb€r of Lob€!, 4, into which o .hell will collopse when subi€cr
to those conditiong
considered in Section 16.3 for the vessel under intemal pressure
only. When
bl9: caused by th€_ fluid pressure and dead load create a compressrv!
S::l
toadrng. lt has to be combined with the loading from the
extemal pressure. nnd the compression term m is
]he ASME Code, YI[-l, has methods to consider each of these rwo
- rypes
of.loadings separately. Extemal pressure, of course, is described in UG_2g 1.23 D:
and
aluar compresslve stress on a cylindrical shell is described in
UG_23(b). How_ "' L',
(16.24)
ever, there is no method given in the ASME code that describes how
to consider
both at the same tirne. An arbitrary method to consider these two
simultaneously and use the ASME Code, VI[-l, procedure was developed
loadings Ity applying Sturm's equationT for the ratio between the extemal pressure alone
Dr. E.O. Bergman in 1954.6 This method combinei the effects of
iy rrna thi *i"t loadings, an equation can be developed that gives an
axial loadinge "o-p."ssive
cquivalent external pressure Pj for the combined loading as a multiplier of the
and extemal pressure by establishing an adjusted pressure
used in the extem-al base extemal pressure Po. This equation is
pressure calculation procedure given in UG_2g.
Based on the von Mises instability formulas as discussed in
Pl= n2-1+m+mct
Chapter 8 for a
cylinder loaded with both radial and axial pressure fouaing, uju. D (16.2s)
oJ-r-i,
" tom wtrich
drtermined-for values of L/D. and t / D,. This is plotted in f.igl tO.O n2-l+m
the value ofz can be easily determined for varioius values of"Lf
D. versus t/Do, For a ) 1.0, the vessel rnay fail by yielding and should also be checked as
A comparison of results between pressure on the sides only and pressure on
the sides and ends indicates that the value of z changes very iinle u cantilever beam including the axial shess effect due to the external pressure'
for values
c < l 0. The ratio a is the axial compression unit toad divijed by the allowabloof fhe axial load from the extemal pressure is
extemal pressure that is permitted when it is acting alone. Eipressed
in an P* = 0.25 P"D- (16.26)
equadon,
p 'Ihe axial load from external pressure in Eq. 16.26 is combined with the axial
(16.22) load from dead loads in Eq. 16.23 to give the total axial loading on the cylindri-
Pp. cal shell. When this loading is divided by the shell thickness, the result is the
And the axial compression unit load is total axial compressive shess on the cylindrical shell. This actual stress is
compared with the allowable axial compressive shess determined according to
UG-23(b) of the ASME Code, VI[-l.
W
' = nD^
P.. (16.23',)
shell and two
Example 16.10. A tall vessel is constructed with a cylindrical
589
I6.7 VESSET UNDER PRESSURE AND EXTERNAI. TOADINO 59I
TAu, VtSSH.S
psi' in'.is satisluctttry
?5
is less than the permissible pressure of 23 9
r
hemisphericul heuds. The vessel is designed for lull vacuum (15 psi
lir .:.0
is needed' I
pressure) at a design temperature of 550'F. The material is 5A-516 Grade
i;il;; ;i;;; tian I .0' no cantilever beam check
-1
c:_=--::0.{1666 l'roblem
ls v(l.0029)
r(C = (2.0X0.0666) = 0.1331 16.16 For the same vessel described in Problem 16'15' what is the required
CS= (0. 12X1.5) = 0. 18; maximum is CS : 0. 14 thickness if the 20,000-lb force is applied at the edge of the
cylinder
KCS = (Z.O)(0.14) = 0.28; maximum KCS : 0.3 rather than at the center of the head?
y = (3/8)(l)(.28)(607,000) : 63,740 rb in Although--the €ffect of the
Answer.' Required thickness = 5/8
F' = 0.07(1.0592)(63,7 40) = 4,7301b but not more than 0.25y = overtumlng moment ls added, the thickness originally selected is ade-
0.25
(63'740, = 15,940 lb; F, = 4730lb quarc.
F" = V - F, = 63,740 - 4730 : 59,010 lb
M" = (s9,010X1400)(2/3) + (4730)(1400) = 61,698,000 in.-lb
REFERENCES
ffr^@# : 310.6 +
Peroleum Institute '
," =
ffi* 5387:1 = s6e8.3
ANSTAPI Standard
Washington, D.C.
65 O, Wetded Steel Tanks for Oil Storage ' American
P, = 15.0 ANSIStandardA58.l-lgS2,BuildingCodeRequirementsforMinimumDesiSn.I'oadsin
Auiidings and Other Stntct r€r, American Nalional Standards Institute'
New York' 1982'
P /56OR 1r
Uniform Buitditrg Code, 1982 ed , Intemational Conference of
Building Officials' Whittier'
"=#r=ffi=3-t266 Cal.
Hydrccarbon Pro-
m = 0.1401 Dechetto, K., and w. Long, "Check Towers for Dynamic stability
c?rrir,g, Vol. 45, No. 2, February 1966, pp' 143-147 ' "'
n=3.0 Bergman, E.O., "The Design of Venical Prcssure vessels
Subjected to Applied Forces"'
it"?in vuutt ona piping Design ASME New York' 1960' pp 576-580
9-l+0.1401 Ctlinders' University of
= 15.8 psi 7. Strum, R.G., A Study of the Collapsing Pressure of Thin'walled
Illinois, Engineering Experiment Station, Bulletin No 329' 1941
Because r :
0.75 in., MAW? = 23.9 psi at 550.F, the shell is still acceptable
with the earthquake loading. When a is larger than 1.0, the vessel is checked
as a cantilever beam. The axial unit stress due to p- is BIBLIOGMPHY
595
396 V!33H.3 0r NoNctRcutaR cRoss sEcfloN l7.r TYpES Ot vEsstls 597
Although many kinds of noncircular cross sections may be used for proces!
vessels, only a few configurations are used widely. The ASME Code, VI[_l,
limits design rules to vessels of rectangular cross section as shown in Fig. 1i, i
and Fig. 17.2 and to obround cross sections. Some additional rules are given fof
vessels with a circular cross section that utilizes stay plates to give addedltrength
to the vessel. The rules in this chapter are limiied to vessels with a straight
longitudinal axis and noncircular cross sections. Rules are given elsewhere ior
vessels with or without a circular cross section that is made into some other shaoo
than one with a shaight longitudinal axis, such as a torus.
Some vessels contain very few openings, whereas many others contain many
openings. If tlere are only a few openings, they usually are individually rein'.
forced by replacing the area removed as described in Chapter 11. In manv
vessels, multiple openings are calculated according to the rules for ligaments.
Ii
jlte diamelers of the openings are uniform through the wall thiikness, the
ligament efficiency is calculated very similarly to that for a circular vessel. Ifthe
opening consists of several different diameters through the vessel wall thickness
,
depending upon the type of calculated stress (either direct membrane sfiess or
bending shess), the effective opening size and the ligament efficiency calcu-
uiitir.
-'. ,tuv'ptut"t to stiffen the flat sides of the vessel'
for rectangular cross
i"n"rui diff"."nt combhations are shown in Fig' 17'3
for rectangular cross sections with stay
r""ii#ii rt ti r"yplates, in Fig' 17'4 circular sections with and without
;;;;d]; F s i'?.5 for obrooid isandsimilar forcross vessels with intemal pressure
Figur. l7,l
"*y ;il; ;ilf""gh the analysis plates on each type
witfr tnos! with extemal pressure, the effect of stay
Four-plore rectongulor hoodcr utilizo! wsld ioints or eoch corner. (Coortesy Ecodyne MR/r{
Diviiion)
"oirJarea
is di-fferent.
+--J
+ l";
figur€ 17.3 Ploin ractongulor crols sectioff. (Courtesy of Americdn So.iery of rt^€€honicol Engineer!, from
Fis. l3-2(o) of the ASME Cod€, vlll-I.) s99
598
I7,4 TIGAMINT ETFICIENCY FOR CONSTANT DIAMETER
OPENINGS 60I
CROSS SECTION
I7.3 OPENING IN VESSELS WITH NONCIRCUTAR
number of openings that are
lirr those vessels and headers that contain a limited
mav be applied For
:';; ;;;g;-lrt p"n"m, the method of reinforced openings
the flat sides of noncircular vesseis, the
reinforcing rules for flat plates apply lf
ligament efficiencv
i;; ;;;;i;;t ;;angea in a reluiar pattern' the method of
rrrav be apDlied.
""i;;Jfi;i"ament efficiency appears in both of the equalions for
mem-
foi some opening confi€urationsit is neces-
brane stress and for bending stress,
stress and the
,^t a J"i".-it" both *rJ hgament efficiency for membrane
$ress' In addition' it is necessary to determine
ili;,-#;i"*t r- t"nain! to the degree of weld joint examination' The
iii**"Ld i"* relati-ve
"in;iency
k,wer effiiiencY of the two is used'
DIAMETER OPENINGS
(c) (d) I7.4 TIGAMENT EFFICIENCY FOR CONSTANT
Figure 17.5 Obround ond circl.llor cros. .€crions with ond wiftout sioy plote!.
a regular pattem as shown ln
l'or flat plates with constant diameter openings in
(Co,rrr,e5y Americon Socioty
oI lchonical Engiru.rc, tom Fig, t3-2(b) ond (c) of th€ ASME Code, V t_I.)
and bending stresses is the
i ig.'i?.6, ,ii" flg"."nt efficiercy for b;rh membrane
same. When the two opemng's being considered
for setting the ligament
an equivalent
rtu"" Ano"nt diam;ters, it is necessary to determine
"iil"i*"y
oi"-"i"i"i,ft" openings by averaging their diameters as
follows:
(17.1)
DB=O'S(dt+dz)
Da=05(1 5 + 1'25):1375in'
.|.|rglisamentefficiencyisbasedontheminimumspacingofp=3'5in.ustng
tlrc eq-uivalent diameter Dr = 1'375
in'
l'roblems
l?.lAheaderisdesignedforaligamentefficiencyofe-=-e'=0667What
is the rninimum cen
for 1 ?5-in diameter openings?
".-,o-tJnt"' 'puting
Answer: d = 5'25 tn'
two.rows of 7 /8in'
17
'' .2
'- Theflat side plate of a rectangular header contains
ie openings,are on 8-in'
iiL"L th" 3-in' apan and the
Jt"-ui" "p"oing.' 'o*'
r6.gi*-oinal spacing along each row The header. aLso contains
Example 17,1. What is the membrane and bending ligament efficiency in a Answer: E = 0'825' which is the ligament efficiency'
rectangular cross section header in which 11:6 lf|.-, h = 12 in., and
tt = tz = 0.75 in. with a single row of 1.5-in. diameter holes on 4-rn. cenrer-
OPENINGS
to-center spacing? I7.5TIGAMENT EFFICIENCY FOR MULTIDIAMETER
SUBJECT TO MEMBRANE STRESS
Solution. Using Eq. 17.2, calculate the efficiency as
Therearemanydifferentarrangementsofplateswith.openings.withmulti. the
4-1.5 ;;;; .iio*n in Fig 17 7' For use in air-cooled heat exchangers'
= 0.625 T ", ar" orr-gJd in increasing diameter through the-plate
."iiidi".J" thickness
tube
rolling in the
*t i", ,. tubJs the larger diarieters are needed for
may be considered'
!,xrmple 17.2. A single row of openings is altemately spaced on 4-in. and for "*",
holding "a-inAny nrrung"'fi"nt of various diameters
power.
3.5-in. center-to-center spacings. The opening diameters also alternate with first For me-mLrane stress, the ligament efficiency is
a 1.5-in. diameter opening followed with a 1.25-in. diameter oDenins. What is
the minimum ligament efficiency for setting thickness? D-Da ( 17.3)
p
Solution, Calculate the equivalent diameier DE to be used in the ligament
vt33!t3 0f NoNctRcutaR cRoss sEcfloN I7.5 TIOAMINT EFFICIENCY SUBJECT TO MfMBRANI STRESS
nr
I
I-,--
IN
t:
:I P
11 . p- d1
+
lFl
I
a, tt.n>j
IF;--;;;'r
*1
do = 1,625"
J
figure 17.8 Hole dsloils Ior oxomple l7'3'
in. I
Figur. 17.7 Op.ning! wirfi muhi{iomeier. Example 17'4. Tubes are expanded into a rectangular header that
is 1'25 in'
'fne grooves in the
tt ict. notes ute 0.875-in. diameter with two 0 3l25-in -deep
hole for holding power. The grooves are 0 125 in' high with 0 25-in'
spacing
between them.-The top gtoove is 0.25 in ftom the top edge
What is the
where membrane ligament efficiincy if the openings are on 3-in' centers?
17.5 A seamless square header that hasT l/4-in- inside measurement by 1.125 2A= boTo + bll + bzT) + .. . + b"T" (17.8)
in. thick is to be formed so that it will have a constant thickness. Thc
header contains a row of 2-in. diameter on 3-in. centers. The holes havc >AX Eq. 17 7
"-
(17.9)
one groove for expansion at the midthickness of the plate that is 0.125 in. >A Eq. 17.8
high and has a2.125-in. diameter. The opposite wall contains a series of
handhole openings 4.25-in. diameter on 7-in. centers with a seat on the From Eq. 17.6
outside 0.125-in. deep by 4.75-in. diameter. What are the ligament
effi ciencies for membrane stresses?
I=2Ior2AXz (17.10)
From Eq. 17.14, the equivalent diameter is + (2.125X0.25X0.125 + 0.125 + O.5 - 0.6243)2
+ (2.0625)(0.125)(0.0625 + 0.5 - 0.6243)2
Ds = 4 -#ffi = 4 - z'47: 1'53 in. + (2.125x0.sx0.6243 - O.2s\2
610 vrsslr.s 0f NoNcrRcurAR cRoss s[cTtoN
STRISSES 6I
I7.7 DTSIGN METHODS AND ALLOWABTE I
17.8 What are the ligament efficiencies for bending shesses in Problem 17.5?
"tn"i"n"y;
rt" p-", irxamined, only the ligament efficiencies. need be considered'
"3"* "i
Provisions are given to account for holis with different diameters
thrcugh the
determined for calcu-
Answers: et : 0.333 on tubeside olate thickness.-For those cases, an equivalent diameter is
iating
- the ligament efficiencY.
et : 0.367 on handhole sido iio- ttt"" for"going discussion, one realizes that care is. required
in deter-
a:t any location. In general, it is. easier to separate the
-i.i; tttd"s
tlt"-
a"-ti-" stress and the bending stress at each location examined
ln most
I7.7 DESIGN METHODS AND ATIOWABIE STRESSES , shesses should be ixamined at the
midpoint and ends of the side
"r"ig*"ti-t
pf"telt waf as at the weld joint, if one exists Other points may
also have to
Design rules given in this chapter are for vessels and headers that have a sraight be examined.
The calculated primary membrane stress is limited to the basic
longitudinal axis with a noncircular cross section and closure plates on each end, allowable
The fonnulas are based on assuming a unitJength vessel section with no t"nril",t gin"nin the applicablecode; however, the combination of primary
stengthening effect form the longitudinal direction of the plate. However, for
certain uniform thickness vessels and headers, provisions are given for plates
-".U.-""r..6tt pfus primary bending stress for a plate thickness assumed to be
rectangular in cross section is limited to the following:
with a length-to-width ratio of two or less to compensate for the added strength
from the longitudinal direction. govern'
1. At design temperatures where tensile strength and yield strength
The design rules in the ASME Code, VItr-I, provide for vessels of rectan-
the lesser of the following:
gular and obround cross section where different walls may have different thick-
(a) 1.5 times the basic allowable tensile stress at design temperature'
nesses. The method used in the ASME Code, VI[-1, combines plate and shell
(b) Yield strength at design temperature'
theory and stuctural design theory where it is necessary to assume wall thick-
nesses and calculate stresses that are compared with allowable stress values. 2. At design temperature where creep and rupture strength govem' the
These methods were described in Chapter 7. lesser of the following:
(a) 1.25 times the basic allowable stress at design temperature'
For vessels and headers of uniform thickness, e.quations can be developed that
(b) Yield strength at design temperature'
17.8 BASIC EouAlloNS 0r3
612 VtSSttS OF NONCTRCUTAR CROSS SICT|ON
is
["br externll prcssure, where the total stress may be compressive, a limitation llcnding moment at cOrner O
also set based on buckling of the side plat€.
il
The basic theory is the maximum strsss theory that is generally used in
structural analysis. For cross sections of members and stifieners other than
M"=+Hl{'##) (17.18)
For analysis purposes, the noncircular cross section of the vessel is considered
as a skuctural frame. Each component of the rectangular or obround
frame
contains a load that causes a membrane stress and i moment that causes Internal Pressure, ?
a
bending shess. The total stress at any point is the summation of these
two
stfesses.
As shown in Fig. 17.9, the direct or membrane
_
by intemal pressure
skess at any point is caused
loading against the adjacent walls. fhls toaaine is resisted
by strength of material, and weld or ligament efficilency of the
-the-thickness,
lvall! that are carrying the load. The applied loading d e)(1,) and the resisting
loading is (&Xr)(2d. When these are equated to e;ch other and solved
for S,l
the membrane stress for the short-side iJ
-Ph
t^: xrn (17.16)
From the theory of structural frames,3 the basic moment equations for
a
rectangular frame under intemal pressure loading p when the two pairs MM
of
oppcsite sides have equal thickness and equal length, as shown in Fig. -.9, diogrom ior reclongulor !€crion heodor'
are lnbrnol pr*3'rr. looding ond b€nding moment 'ro$
as follows: rigur€ '17.9
6t4 Vt!!!ts 0f NONCTRCUTAR CROSS SECTION
17.8 BASIC EQUATIONS 615
Momont ol incrtiu /1 lirr short-side is
L=\
t3 M,=ilffi)-?
. P /htl, + Htlz\ PHz (r728)
'12 (t7,2ll
('learing Eq. 17.28, we obtain
Moment of inertia 12 for long-side is
p /hJt. + Hjlz\
,. - L t:_:.L-- P l2rrz (17.2e)
|-
1..
r3
'2
""- t2\w,+at, J r28
n 07.22,t
Clearing P/12 in Eq. 17.29 gives
The basic equation for bending stress rs
M-=+ffi#-1.s''?) (17.30)
So:M'
I Multiplying Eq. 17.30 through by (-l),
Bending stress in comer of short_side is
M-=+('5"'- +J#) (17.31)
G)a=ryx!
Z.lt E (r7.23)
Substituting Eq. 17.31into Eq. 17.25 andcfor hf2:
Bending stress in comer of long_side is
$),=h(""'- +tuo,.; (11 .32)
6;)a=ryx!
2lz E (r7 .24)
Ilxarnple 17.7. Determine the adequacy of a rectangular cfo-ss-sectional
Bending stress at the midpoint of the short_side headeiwith a design pressure of 150 psi and made from a seamless forging with
oi t2,soo psi' The header inside dimensions are 14 in by
is
tn allowable .t
"ti
7.25 in. with a constant thickness of 1 in. All openings are reinforced'
tsr.lr: $
UtE* 1 (17 .2s)
Solutian
Bending stress at midpoint of the long_side is
1. Calculate the moment of inertia:
,",
rs-,u=_PH=
(t50x7.2s) \-'Y:-' = o.o2o3 I,: tz\ (lt -= 0 0833
l,r (0.625)r
T ,(D :540 psi L = i= i=;-
Mp using 8q 17 18:
10. Calculate membrane stress on short-side:
3. Calculate the bending moment at the comer
Ph t50)( 14)
(J'),v=t= (
lo5opsi
r(ri:
ll. Total stress at corner of long-side: 4. Calculatethebendingmomentatthemidpointofthelong.sideMMusing
Eq. 17.19:
(S)o,u = (,S.),r.r * (S)aa:540 + 11,030 : 11,570 psi
(S)u = (&)v + (Srr : 5,40 + 11,020 = 11,560 psi 5. Calculate the bending moment at the midpoint
of the short-side Mrv using
Eq. (17.20):
13. Total stress at comer of short-side;
6t8 vlsSIts of NoNctRcutaR cRoss stcTtoN 9 EOUATIoNS lN THE ASME CODt',
vlll'l 619
. 17
Mn = Mo -'+ = 84r.3s - t+q :323.8s (S)o,v = (S,)'v + (Sr')o'v = 1550 + 12'950 = 14'500 pst
'l'hc allowable stress for membrane stress is 17'500 p:'-Td ft^t't* combined
<s,t*=W:ffiffi=5o5opsi rrrembrane plus bending t*t""t-'it"i i-s = l 5(li'500) = 26'250 psi All
stresses and are acceptable'
|rlculated sfesses are tess tnan tne aiowable
7. Calculate the bending stress at the midpoint of the long-side with
holes (E = ea = 0.60): l'roblems
C-sections that are-buttrvelded
along
Mucz : ( 1778.50X0.5.) 17.9 A header is made ftom from two *eld is not examined and the backing
tsttu = -ilF: I /./eu psi fn"
(0.0S33X0O the centerline of th" bv 6 bv
il;;;. in pro""; tr'"tiiott' E = 0 65 -The.header-is 12
'tto*-'iA"
at the weld
is the stress
8. Calculate the bending stress at the comer of the short-side (E = 1.0): I in. thick with a de"gn p'";tit" oiZoO psi' What
joint?
Maq: (841.35)(0.3125)
= 10'160 Psi
(o^oro3xl3) =
ttilaN = 12'950 psi Answer: Maximum stress
iE
along
C-sections that are bxtt welded
9. Calculate the bending stress at the midpoint of the short-side (E : 0.80): l?.10 A square header is made from two
wetd- efficiency
liJes' The is 0 65'
ioint
the centerline or t*o oppoiit" 2-in diameter on
of openings that
The adiacent side co"tain' u 'ow
t.)att : Mucr= (323.85X0.3125) = bzru Psr 5.75-in. centers' fr'" O"'igtipt""ut"
ii ttoisi and the lreader is 7'25 by
'are
lF (oJro3xojo) it tfi"''l*ito* where is it located?
stress and
0'75 in. thick' Wf'ut
10. Calculate the membrane stress on the long-side (E = e^: 9.691
Maximum stress = 5950 psi at corner of welded
side
Azs*er"
\r.)M =
PH= (l rsx6) :
Ui ,(lx0f) )uu PSr
I7.9 EQUATIONS IN THE ASME CODE'
VIII-I
11, Calculate the membrane stress on the short-side (.E = 0.S0):
Appendix13.r,h:f y:::*h#t" j;,:.lllllll1lH"',,'Tl:H jiJ,::iT;
=
Ph= (l1sxt3.5) jfi *::*'ffi
\r^tN
zttE ,(o.6rsxo3) = l55u Psr
ttriillT:l:i:Tfl
ASME :re
Code irs:i;if#l:h'#'
mexpressed c
'll"l,l:
to the sPecific geometries shown'
12. Total stress at corner of long-side: same thickness' the equations
in the ASME
When the opposite sides have the lT lT However'
Code, V[I-l, are the same * tnot" *iu"n in Eqs 17 16 and
(S)oy = 6^)u + (S)e1a = 580 + 5050 : 5630 psi *"tt' *"*rt"" theri are rounded comers' or when
when opposite thicknesses a specific
ue ,esM! code has
some other variation occurs , iir"'g"".""y,
13. Total stress at midpoint of long-side: oiut J"utiopta ttot the theory of structural
equation for that conngo'ut'on
'f'ui
(S),v = (S.),y + (Stff : + ftHl'"quu,ion, The prin-
580 17,790 = 18,370 psi for the bending stresses were similarly.developed
t4. Total stress at comer of short-side: .ipi",oi"*o*a f.T::"',::1"*f .J:rT: ;#:ffiil:tX"il:^1f'""?#'fl
to sive different equatrons rol
+
Z:
\-l
'{
-!:
-(\
-+
I
,: -s
3 +: +
*sl
+I j
crs \l* \i ;
I
I I
t(a
-^-r-i- T 5 i T-r
't!.
-i
+ (J
9,)
€-E-'"r
lt5\(l
l- c.l
;
:' I
Fst.
^slv
,n ^r
F .*
,-..:\
^;l{
al
+ +
:
{lv +I
c'l
\]:
ol+ -l+ \) di
*l+ + I
ll-=l-
-l-tir Eo N +
\]
N
+
.:_-:-\
+ '{
ol
f'l
r_]d
dl
d
.\ilNI
6Jor
i
!J
.-i-
-i1c.|
i-]^ F
"? ^' ]: : \"1^ :J I a.a\
*+.F\E I
tl$ ti! rl$ tlH ;F it5 ].
E
le
{-l$
IN
*<-
<\'
lai '--:a
-l tN ,lla -t{ :l lA:
rN
s
.+Y
+< dl-
*llc ili
^ t!.1
I
qJ
620 621
622 vfssg.s oF NoNctRcurAR cRoss sEcTtoN
t't .3b
Short-side
Long-side
Short-side
Ph /(2hE)
Ph/(2t28)
Ph /(2^D
(17
n Long-side -=:=--=l4NH'-2h'? | (K, + k?)
b./Yttt2l I L
K= -kt(Kt + k) + Kr - Kr))\
t;td (r7 , "'k
P(a + L)/^E
|+ = t. * l4 *
I:, 1] h3lt + H3t2 17 .3c Short-side
P(h + s)lhE
o2K -
r,^i]____Fh
Lh,..
(r7. Long-side
p(tE l17 + d/ns
comel
+
r+K=l *11 "',.1 -htt+Ht2 (r7 t't .3d Short-side Php/2(At ph)E
Lh rtl hll Long-side PHp 12( z + pt)E
_h2(l + a2n = _orlhtl, + Hrl, u H, I _ h3lt + H3I2 l7 .3e Shon-side P(L+L.l+a)/hE
(l+K) -L h'1, "ht,+Htr] hlt + HI2 (t7 .
Long-side P(h+h+a)/t2E
tt.)a Midpoint, curve P(a + L)/nE
Substituting Eq. 17.38 into Eq. 17.33 gives Pa/hE
End, curve
Side PaltzE
@,:#,rftt"'- +:#] (17 t't .5b Midpoint, curve
End, curve
P(a+L)pl(At+ph)E
Pap/(A, + ptt)E
Pap/(At + ph) E
Equation 17.39 is identical to Eq. 17.32 and shows the relationship between Side
thl
gquations in Appendix 13 of the ASME Code, VI[-l, and those derived fron
basic theory. The ASME Code contains extensive nomenclature in Article
13.!
fo-r yarioug configurations. Equations for the bending stresses in Table
l3_lg,l
of the code are shown in Table 17.1. In addition, equations for membrana Tqble 17.3
:hTle! for various configurations in the ASME Code, VIII_I, are summarizod LtlH or Lr/h Cz
in Table 17 .2.
Although all the formulas have been developed on the basis of a length_to. 0.56 0.62
1.0
width L1/H and Ly /ft of four or more-the ratio where there is no long dimen. 0.70
1.1 0.64
sion effect-provisions are given for the simple rectangular header shown o.77
in 1.2 0.'13
Fig. 17.3a to reduce stresses when the aspect iatio is lei than two. The mem,
1.3 o.79 o.82
brane stresses remain the same, but the blnding stresses are reduced
by multl. 0.85 0.87
plying by the factors in Table 17.3. The stressei are then obtained by 1.4
using tho 0.91
following equations: l.) 0.89
1.6 o.92 0.94
For the short-side at the comer: 0.96
0.95
1.8 0.9't 0.9'l
(Sa)o = Eq. 17 .23 x C2 (17.40)
1.9 0.99 0.99
2.O 1.00 1.00
For the shon-side at the midpoint:
623
r7.9 EQUAI|ONS lN THI ASMI coD[,
vlll'l
vEssH,s oF NoNctRcurAR cRoss sEcfloN
For the long-side at the corner: midpoint of the long-side using Table
17 l'
Calculate the bending stress at the
lirst equatlon:
(sa)o = Eq' 17 '24 x Cz
f, . - I +-t(0.51?9)rl = lr.020psi
(l50x0.s)(l4f I
For the long-side at the midpoint: (s,)" =
1;(o58txt L' ' I o.5l7e I
(Sa),r.r = Eq. 17.26 x Cl ( 17. truilt with a shortened
l,lxample 17.10. The header in Example 1?'9 is to be
midpoints considering the
For those cases where eitdrrer Lr/H or Ltf h is elss than 1.0, it is necessary ffi;;ffi;;; = ia in. wttu' trt" foesses
'"
at the
rho-rtened length?
reorient the axes of the header and to recalculate all properties such as
of inertia of the wall. Dimensions are chosen so that the longest dimension is L1,
Solutian. Zr = 18in';H = 7 '25 in'; andh = l4it' Calculate the following:
the next dimension is ft, and the shortest dimension is 11. This may result in
pafi which was originally considered to be an end closure becoming a wall
the header. All calculations are based on this revised confieuration.
L'
= 18 2.48 cr : c2 = l.oo
Vessels of noncircular cross section may be subjected to external pressuro, H 7.25 =
Membrane and bending sfiesses are considered the same as for intemal pressun L:
unless the resulting stresses are compressive where stability may be a possibh =9 =
h14
t.ZS Ct = 0.79 znd Cz = 0.82
mode of failure. Interaction equations are used to examine the various plates fot
stability. Calculated stresses are compared with critical buckling stresses with I long-side only because the length-to-
The strengthening effect applies to the
factor of safety applied. This is described in Article 13-14 of the ASME Codo,
width ratio ii less than 2'0 This gives
vl[-l.
(s6)r x cl = (11,020)(0 79) = 8?10 psi I
(s)1q' =
Example 17.9. The rectangular cross-sectional header in Example 17.7 il be built with a shortened
made according to ASME Code, VIII-I, rules. What are the bending stresses at ExamDle l7.tl. The header in Example 17 9 is to
axes for analysis and what
the midpoints of both the short-side and the long-side? ffi1ilfi;;''= iz in' whnt is aonejo trt" n"aaer long-side?
midpoints oi the short-side and the
,rt"
^r"",il"'r'o""". "
Sohttion. Knowns: Il = 7.25 in.: h= 14 in.; r= 1 in.; c = 0.5 and geometry properties as follows:
Solution. Calculate the header
E = 1.0. Calculate a. 1. and K as follows:
Lr: 12 = t.66
H 7 '2,5
"=#=T:o.ttn 4 =9 = o'ss
rl fl\l h14
r=i=;-=0.0833
( reoriented for analysis ln the
Lr/h 1.0, the axes of the header must be
. = (,:)" =
0.0833
(0.0833X0.s 179)
:0.5179 Since
ffi;#, r,) tqin.,h= 12in', andrl-= -,,1:
7'tf in' -
flat end closur-et^which have now
The first assumption is that the originat
Calculate the bending stress at the midpoint of the short-side using Eq. 17.33 b".;.';i;;";'also I in trti"t on'tttur basis' 1= 0'0833 remains'
and Table 17.1, second equation:
" =+
=ff = o.suz
/t4), I
(1s0)(0.5)
fr s,z rsv - rr+,
+ (0'5t79)3'l
(Ja)":
l2(0.0833)(1) Lt.J\t.zJ, K= O.6042
VESStLs lN OTHER CODES 627
vEsSEt s o; NoNCtRCUtAR CROSS SCCTTON l7,lo DGSION Of NoNclRcutAR
/c, -- (150X0.5)(lD2f .- - I + (0.6042)r'l (0 62; One term in the denominator is the membrane
effect and the other term is the
'""' D6lEl5?i) 1t': 1; fi,ai | = ae5e o,'
t em"ct. Substituting terms from the ASME
Code' gives VI[-l'
"nOing
Problems h eb K = bending moment tenn
I 2: €n =
^ =;
21
s*i. =
17,11 A rectangular vessel of the cross section shown in Fig. 17.3c ir 100 for kilo x=d
constructed from 5A-516 Grade 60 material. The design pissure
is 75
psi.at a design temperature of 300.F. There is no cfusion and
full Substituting these terms into Eq 17'rg gives
radiography is applied at all weldjoints. What are the total stresses
in tho
s= (z'
long-side plaies and in the comer section using the method in the ASME
P- '2 (r7.4s)
Code, VI[-1, Appendix 13? Dimensions are as follows: 11 0.75 in,;
a=3in.;L=6in.;h:3:[il. = \/'/ *i;. +1hKtr'
Rearranging terms and solving Eq' 17 45 for S gives
Answen At center, ,t = 14,100 psi
Ph lta 3hK\
At end, ,S : 1480 psi s=*\*= )
(17 .46)
Ph
I7.IO DESIGN OF NONCIRCULAR VESSETS IN OTHER CODES
-s = 2Et'= (td. '+ 3hn
(r7.47)
In addition to the ASME Code, VI[-l, design rules for noncircular pressure
the Swedish Pressure Vessel Code
vessels are contained in other design codes as well
as in various textbooks. In The basic equation for the short-side ftom
addition, empirical design rules have been developed and used is:
for a numUer of
628 VtSStts of NoNctRcutAR CROSS SECTTON I7.IO DESIGN OF NONCIRCUTAR VESSETS IN OTHTR
CODES 629
K = K^ =(o.s18f
+ 40.s18) - 2
= -0.116
\-LA--rZd
K^: (17 .s2)
+_1lj-_lj x (0 116)
T
s_
1s0(14X1 = 6170 psi
Midpoint of short-side:
q-ttq-z Problems
KN: ( 17.53)
17.12 Using the design conditions for the vessel described in Example 17 12'
Any point y. from midpoint of long-side: if thJ same cross_sectional area is kept but the cross sectlon $ square
midpoint
at the
iort*A of a""t-gular, what are the maximum stresses
and comer of thJ side using the Swedish Code?
K^,: K.- o.s (Y-)' (17 .s4) : 4560 psi
\m/ Ansrver: Stress at midpoint
lT.l3ForthevesseldescribedinExamplelT12'what-isthemaximum
K^' = K, - 0.5 f)-)'
\n/
(17.55)
allowable working pressure for the header if the thickness
is increased
tot= 1.5 in'?
Example 17.12, Using the Swedish pressure Vessel Code formulas for n Answer: MAWP = 600 psi based on the stress at the corner of the
rectangular header, determine the maximum stress at the midpoint of both the short-side'
lN oTHER coDts 63l
630 Vl33tr3 0F NoNctRcutaR cRoss stcTtoN l7.lo DESIGN Ot NoNclRCUl'AR VESSELS
surlace of b = {7L'
17.14 A vesscl of the dimensions in Example 17.12 is made from two cular limits measured from the vessel is the nominal
Aia*"tet and
sections welded along the centedine of the short-side. The weld ioint where d, is ttre actJ op"nin^g
'd
only visually examined and no backing strip is used (E = 0.70). Wt ,fti-.tn"t' of the tube stub (in'')
are the maximum stresses at the midpoint and the corner of the
determined from either Eq' 11 44a or F4'
side? Once the ligament efficiency.ls
from
fl.+S, th. valie of K is determined
Ansrrel: Stress at midpoint = 8810 SE
Stress at comer : 12,530 psl
x=V
17.10.2 Design by lloyd's Register of Shipping Rules where S : allowable tensile stress
(psi)
Rules for the design of forged, rectangular cross-sectional headers air given P = design Pressure (Psi)
Chapter J of Lloyd's Rules. In order to use the rules, the header has\i con
E = ligament efficiency
radius of not less than 0.25 in. As with other desisn methods for
cross-sectional headers, stresses at the corner and in the ligaments betwecn A= distance ftom centerline of hole
'l'he value ofA/8 is then determined where
from tangent of comer to tansent
openings are examined.
The method used to detennine the efftciency of ligaments between openingl
il;#;;;;";;,uaio' -a r = ditt*""
in Fig lT l0 Using the value of K'
enter
of corner (both in inches), u'
't'o*n the.value of A/B'Readhorizontauv
is similar to that used in other codes except that Lloyd's Rules permit coniiderin'g
the reinforcement area in a welded tube stub as giving a smaller equivalent
lri.'"..iiJ" #i;.;t. irj"'ii
""4 ""'JJlvio
uJui r' the minimum required thickness'
of
ro determine the value ot
diameter. Without welded tube stubs, the hole diameter is used.
H;"ji.i;',H*1""a. 'lo' 'n" of r tnitt U" greatel than t. [f the values are
fi,"
"Au. pto""doi" repeat€d until the values are
For a regular pattem of holes, the ligament efficiency is
uDart. the value of I ls reduceo und th"
cIose.
(17.s6) doss-sectional htd:t using the
p Example 17.13. A rgctlnSlr| -square wittr no ftbe openings' -lt-,*t]t The allow-
Llovd's Rules. The header rs I :]in' 150 psi'
For an irregular pattern of holes, that is, one in which the spacing between th" d"tign pt"ssure P equals
abli stress of the materi* is rs,o0O fsi':oJ
op;nings is variable but the opening diameter is the same, the ligament ffi"ij, ,it" rnrnrfi required thitkness of the header?
efficiency is
Solutinn
p, Io,-Zd
L- =" - (17.s7)
Ptrpz 4=o
B
anct J= 1.0
K=Y= lfiH
For an opening without a tube stub, the hole diameter d is used. For an
opening with a welded tube stub, the diameter used is the equivalent diameter = rooo
d. determined by
t
0.056
d"=d-LT (17.58)
B
B:7'5-2(o'2s)=t'o
where I = nominal thickness of shell or header (in.). r = (7 0X0'056) :0 392 in' I
A, = excess area in tube stub over that requ ed for internal design on 3 5-in' centers lies along
pressure plus area in attaching fillet welds within perpendi_ Example 17.14. A row of2-in' diameter openings
6t2 vtgSlrs 0i NoNC|RCUTAR CROSS SrcTtoN BIBTIOORAPHY 633
A/B
4 = 0.s0
E3333SB I B
B
1 = (0.23)(7.15 - 2 x O'25) = 1.668 in' I
I'roblems
of a
17.16 Using the Lloyd's Rules' what is the minimum -requi-red.thickness
' "^" 0'25-in corner radius and 9-25--in' inside
wall-to-
;J";;er'with psi and the
i^l;i;;;;"rtrl" urro*uur" tensile stress is 1s'000
10865432 contains a row of openings that is
desiqn Dressure 1800 psr' One side
K i.o-in. aiut.t.t on 3'b-in' spacing along the center'
AIB Answer: t,ni,, = 1'75 in'
0,30
u.lTwhatistheminimumrequiredthickness(withinl/16in')inProblem
The tube stubs are
17. 16 if welded tubestuus' are added at the openings?
o,m
anA aftached by a 0'25-in' fillet
1.O-in. inner diameter uy O ZS in' ' tttict
0,15
weld.
tlB
t";n: 1'75 in Cannot be reduced to 1'625 in'
0,10 Answer:
0,08
0,07
0,06
REIERENCES
0,05
and Other Pressue vessels"' it Rules and
l. Lloyd's Register of Shipping, chap J' "Boilers
the Co structon and tlassirtcaio of Steel Ships' London' lg72'
K Relulatiotls for
of the Strength of Pressure^Vessels' Publication
Figuro l7.t0 Rcclongulor r
hooder thickness 'aquiremenis for tlovd's regisr€r
ot shippins (courl'elv Llovdl
2. Swedish Pressure V essel Code' Calculation
Stockholm' 1967'
Rssisior ot shippins) Series A No. lE, Swedish ttessure vessel Commission'
August 19?6, James F. Lincoln Arc
r, tiJg"t, o.", w ., DesiSn ofwellments, 8th printing,
the centerline of a header that is 7. 75-in . square Wetdog gounAation, Cleveland' Ohio' 1963'
with 0. Z5-in. inside corner radii.
The material's allowable stress is.15,000 psi tf," J"riln
-a
What is the minimum required thickness bf the f."rr*"
fSOO pri.
header?
BIBTIOGRAPHY
Soltrtion. Calculate the ligament efficiency as follows: Barberton'
Recnngular Headcts' Rabcock & Wilcox'
Allovlable Working Presswes--square vnd
Ohio, 1950 (private communicatlon) '
^ 35-)
E=::_:____-::=0.42g6 Roark, Raymond J. andwaren Young' Fom ulasfot Stess and Strai'' 5th
c ed Mccraw-Hill'
'
'
New Yolk, 1975
Calculate the other properties of the header
as follows:
sE (15,000)(0.4236)
r = P= (1500) = 4.286
,!t
APPENDICES
635
GUIDE TO ASME sEC.
VIII' DIV' I
fu|.fu4'A*dirr'.'cu^nno
1r
il
APPENDX A lt
ll
ffibv ft e Am€ricon
:l:;1ffi
nn''""''
societv or
.'liJi"l
i,Li; lill iH' Lv ioo'z''o'n'"'i
e
H;:ij,'"3ill:"1il'.f;".)'li
l'Jll"i'i,J-*it, ""** ins' De'' \ela \
637
GUIDE TO BRITISH CODE BS.55OO CODE
GUIDE TO A. D. MERKBTATT
J. W. Strowson, Oil Componies Mqleriols Associotion, London e'V''
H. Steffen, Vereinigung der
Technischen Uberwochungs-Vereine
Essen, Wesl GermonY
1,---^-*--J:l
sb,ve-J'.tNol..
tribi (,dud) dm
rr.iriLon (o!u{n rdrcn
^o.B?- -aos2
lB:i'",-,..*'
srh..ic.rt d'hd B
^D.s3- 11 e lf$<
3:llll"ft-*-^""""" :liEEry,.+
ii*ri*;;'::m*:::::*l i'drcnit G!-11:::
PEumia Gi
LEg I
r#r:g:'liJ.Tffi:
tmF
-",..::::",""
Fif
-aY-:.-:
ddd4e/od_
- -- '::;:;
"."f.";Y'
18-32,
cort HeymonnsVerlos KG, Gereoftrr*!€
Fisuro A.2 cuid6 to Brirish Cod6 SS.55OO. (p,rblirhed by rhe Britilh gondords Insriturion, 2 pdrk Sirser,
ffi ot Germ i3,'n- a n'***bon Prccessins' D*
1978')
London WfA 2BS, co{r.t sy o-sOm s cotogn", F.derot Republic ""i'
ot Hy&ocatbn kocessing, De<. lg7'.)
639
VESSET CODE
GUIDE TO DUTCH STOOMWEZEN CODE GUIDE TO SWEDISH PRESSURE
The Swedish Pressure Vessel
P. von Rossen, Diensl voor hef Sloomwezen, ,s-Grovenhoge, The l. Berglund, Tryckkirlskommissionen'
Netherlonds Commission, Stockholm
lo,5-xozh..dorc.h.d
sE'9.|4-Geo'12!)
D &h'c. ri.
*'-""---- ":::7"
l1rli?..-i,-",".'--) H:H l*T'":il -,"..?,r il
"x
F.DrD _Ooaqs.|s@or.Mr,o7oi
'"' :i#lBffiil$rj#'1fiilj{ffilljlf;3$C*{E"F}::#'3'ff:U'ii
Sf{*,.*if
(Published bv Trvchkkorkkommi'3ion€n
lvA' P o Box
Fio'ireA.5 Guide to Swsdi3h P'e$ure ve$er code Prccessins' DEc teTa')
ot ttdrcnrbon
fisu.6 A.,{
cuid€ to Dukh Stoomw.zen Code, (Published for rhe Minisrry of Sociot AfidiB [Di€nsr voor h6r l":ti. l-iti;;1.anorm, sweden; courtesv
Stoomwezenl by Govornm€nr Publishing Offico, Chrisioffel Plonriinsrroot, The Hdgue, N€thendnds; courbiy
ol Hydrea$on Processing, Oe<. l979.l
&1
640
VESSEL CODE
GUIDE TO ITATIAN PRESSURE VESSGT CODE GUIDE TO JAPANESE PRESSURE
".!-$ll'#:'""'"'-
-a1..=1e-lAH{H'rud",.
rird ,itit ;:.d.;;i#6i."!-?o?1r"
r\
wdd oFrir
-r,r.o2 I
a
tt \=lE!-T
-v.s.R.r.t,s
^l.t.iob-v.s'i''''i
rrntu l'-G.n Bbi
:1-- l,llx.li'" ----."r{; iEEi'i' J Xl ;":;-.-, -""- "
-v5e.r.F.3
I=IHH ::il'H*4fi' iX'bF *t;;* :tt'i= I
atu6,d rul.
fr;;u^d o{gd-nt!
.".--'' '5
5'
.rdn.lor.u.--4rie
2'0 I
ffi
-s
Fisu.o A.6 Guide to ltolion Pres5ur6 Vossal Code. (pubtkhed by Co3o Ed;rrice tuisi Di G. piroto, vio bv rhe
% Ab'irvoku Yo'iki Kouzou Kikohu'
CorFlico, P.O. Box 3680, Mifon, lt'j,ly 2468Ar <owtety ot Hdroc bon pro.essing, D... 197A., Fisur€ A.7 G!i& ro rory:a
P:'*:"::::;;iln s-ss-r st'il'o r^ino'o-Ku,Iokvo,
roPon' courtesv
the JoPon borrc
r.rinirtrv oI I'obor, poblish€d bv
tlioeorbon processns' De'
19741
"l
&3
g2
tAW
PRESSURE GAS CONTROT
GUIDE TO JAPANESE STD. PV CONSTRUCTION GUIDE TO JAPANESE HIGH
i;;;;d;F;'-,.,5
5
-arrr
rhddh'dd9.dd.-1.
thB|lA.eij'.d.-B T-ffi
12
-senrk
rv dbH @
;liliiffi
PF-.J
ii:}i:F,s--- ";
Mrr rndrbb *dit p,[*r-t3 n::,ffi;u:--"*.'.
flllf:i"---------;li ,ffi
tu:;;::
f,ll*1i:!l-=--' '{i=----------=1r'
fuol4[ch( Ej-.':;
sq
stud. l\
645
d44
HEAT EXCHANGER SPECIFICATION SHEET
APPENDX B
SAMPLE OF HEAT
EXCHANGER SPECI FICATION
SHEET
u6 47
API Strndrrd 850
Stor.gc Tlnk Spcctllcltlon Dlta Shcet
sh..t 1 ol3
FlL No.
Phdic _---
SPECIFICATION SHE -
Dbnatar, nur,
rd/or 8.bin Rdtena
l,t i!i!. rs.
Co|EtL
D'C'
Court$y ot lhe An€ricon Pelroler,m Inslitur€, Woshinglon'
u8 g9
8h.at 3 ol 3
ahrt 2 0t: Flh No.
Conalnrc on On I. (!t ttrutotur., rnr'o, Frxdr-r, ar
Ff. o.
I Manul&arcr ^tDtb!b)
Clty
$ara
S.fial tto.
2 Fabrlcator
- Doof Stt..t ( PP.
Flulh-TYP.
650 651
Pressure Veesel Deslgn Dsta Sheet
Bcagr.4s$c!
cepaclty of v65e1: ec.ktns pte6Bure: ----l?!- P"18
653
.10
ata APPTNDIX
llBrde rsdlu' .' Dorzr!: (8.623-7.750) (.137) (15,000/17'500) - .103 3q' ln.
r".-,. .;';;;:.",'..';;;;-;;",.';.,,."-
*a€+{+ (s!€clfy) befolc
"""t', "-
coiloBion atr. (cf ttc-4b)
D@rnal,h1c'.!e.6, .,rc''ii.ve of
I \ . 1.045 so. ln.
".,.J::':,i:,:::'.1,.1..i::
bhlEle lequlred thlcknels (!efere.(€:
#*
U6-Z,) ... .....,.... ._ ;;; A- - Ectrl' ln th. aotrl. rlll oultlil' th' 'h€11
!btcy!!t3
- ' rv.ll.bl! fo! r!bfotc@'D!: At - .J9Etr x. i.r.
rsr-;jta-o (.438-,$e) (2)G)
€xce8E "
thlckDea€ ....., ,...........,. r_t_ 0,137
(.43S-.139) (2) (1.s95) t" belo' for h :-:913-cs.:-$.:-
2, Norzle A- - r.L1 ritil.il .| t.i.3lorc@cat '!d !'trt b 'lircbo6t
tlalertal uEed: se€lless s.eet pt!€, sA-i06. clede B (s3h - rililoil tolaforcrocrt (U2
toaxlD@ aUorable 6t!es3 . !.... <,.. ...
80) Lach Phtc' 8-5/8 :D bv 14-5/8
j.n'l.e ittuere! of lblshcd r,.;,"r"; :"";r;;";'...:: oD)
"".,r"r
ndlnal thlcksess excluslr€ 6f
:tr* (.50O) (r4.525-8.525)
.3.000 rq. 14.
co!!.€ron 6Uoasn4. . . ,.. . .. , . r o'rt3fi! of
thlcknese lequlled for hrrp.Ere6s ,U"-rtl ,.....,.........
0.438 in. o4-belt tnch fuU ftU€t s'ld! 'losad
,_] ;;; i.raiotcf"g Plrtc .!il srolad noztlc srll:
tTPR. (.50) (.50) (.50) (4)
. .50O .q, b.
- -
3. sk€rch
".le1nforc.€Eepr ,:rhar*-ra-3fii3#isi
of
GE :{ol-:?r
dto€nslors 4: - g.soo b.
6id seidlns deialt (W_15._X5._1E.1 'o.
3. Ifdth ol .!.s of t.luforc.DcDt nolEil to v'sscl nrll:
oc-40(e)
(2.s) ('587) - 1.720 1D.
and Selection
Attochmcnt Weldlng for 8-tnch Ouflet (UW-fS, -16) It-Inch Lap'Jolnt l'lange Attachment
fo! !o
rtrd 6h'11 rnd t'l[fo!c1!8 '!r'rgth
l. lllo!.!1c .t!.3!G6 1p vc1d6: (Tbt. Un-lsJ r.l chcck tleldbg b'r'c'! noztl'
(!) ccabiDcd 6at rlit 31d€ loadLlt €rr.s6 1n brrt ,.1d6 I ot.h".^od hvillollrllc fotc'
'ril LB butt .'']d' (rbl n$-15)
(17500) (0.74) - ;:;;; 6t!c' 10,500 PE1
12,950 }rt '""'
(b) cmblned .[d ind s1d. lo.trlls 6t!!86 tD flllct eeld€ (u,sOO) (.60) '
of butt r"1it (cf 'h!* 4 for
drDdlloDs)
(17J00) (0.49) - ;.1;..;.; 195,450 tb.
E,560 ?.1 (ro'500) -
2, Strhrth of l,l€1d6: (r) (s,525) (.687)
!orc! to bslil' ilt'!'tet o:
noz'rc
(r) outer ftuer s.Ial b.tr..! ves6cl ratt lDd r.hfolcbg plar€ ;'";..t".Dd 24,700 tb.
(n/4) (?.750)' (525) '
6\ 04.62512) (0.500) (Es5o) - 9E,500 lb. *r' ro! b'd!o3t!tlc 'Dd
(b) :;:"'.;:'";;; ,.,u .'*' 195,460>24'700 lb. .
butt rr.ld b.tr..r v.sr.l r'ru .nd !6rzt! !'eU '.
foic' 4o0 l!'
(n) (8.52512) (.687) (12r9s0) . PlP lt rEr)t's ltd Flttrt'gs' uB'
(c) f1U€! !r.1d b.tt'ecD lorrl. |!it r.lDforclDS phr.
1.20,500 lb, 2, Fror A161 315.t192 srlrL
(1) (8.6?'s12> (0.500) (8550) . !.!.il .! 565 Ptt rt 50' F'
38,000 r!. FtoD vtti'6'! cttrlogt
(d) b!!! ultd b3rt'!.! aoz.tc ndl rlil t.bto!c!.!8 ph!.
(n) (8.625/2) (0.500) (r2950) - D,'!b!! of boltt
87,600 rb. .1t' ot bolt'
E$!: 13 lnchli
(r) .tt.!gEh 1n !.n.toD of rh. pL!. rroov.d firC-41(b)(2) boll cltcf ill'Dltct """"'""' tDchcs lons
8'625 oD bv ?'625 lD bv I
(17500) (.550) (8.6?5) - ,, o.. ;:;.;t 't!rb 'Dd' 1^5 ln' saskot - i2 rn' (D bv I tn' D -
831000 $. ;: ;;;; crirl'os' ts'
(b) .r!.Dgth of !.trt 1D vcrr.I rrtl .v.lhbl. for r.lnforc.r!.!t
(17500) (.137) (15,50 - 8,625) - 15,500 11.
(.) rclEJorc6!6r lord e.!tLd by rh! ro:rt.|'rtl
(15000) (2) (.438) (.687) - 9,030 :.b,
+ (15000) (2) (.2ee) (1,59i) . 14.330 It.
23,380 tb.
(il) rclDfolc.o.a! 1o.dt c.rrLat by r.l.DforctoS lhtc
E3!000 - (15,500 + 23,380) - 43,120 th.
4. -9.w.:
(r) 16.d !o bccrrrt.d !y rltrcb.it r.hforc.o€nr
E3,000- 16,500 - 55,500 tb,
rtr.Dtrh of rtt.clDllr - 98,500 + 120,500. 219,000 Ib.
(b) lord to b. clrrlcd by lorzh ritl - 23,380 L!,
atlen8th ol rttrchElDt - 120,500 :.b,
(c) r6.d to bc c.Flcd bt r.hfofcllt ptrt€ - 43,120 tb.
.r!.n8th of rttrclE.nt - 98,500 1!.
Attr.hD.Dr elldl[g ls lrtlsf.ctor?
cto 661
APPENDIX
Prollmlnary Derlgn of tE.Inch Inregrel
l.lrnge
Prellmlnary Deslgn of lE'Inch Integral Flange
- (27,L25)
^c - (24.525, d.!tr! p!G..ur! - aBlestos sasket HlI1 be us€d 19 lnch ID bv 22 I'ph @
ll ,. ^ r/rS lnch flat '
S2S
:rrna!d.318n rt!.!i r ]2,OOO
Dort d.8tgn .t!€si . 2O.OOO
z, Flon Table 2-J.2t
try 1.250 ln. Dl.s!t.! bott!
root .!e. - 0.943 iq. tn, (8
,!i e6rtEar. basrc sasket Beatitts f,ldth, \o = G/z)(n - 19)/2 = o'?5o i^'
8. . 0.553 1n. rlitth, b = (1'/z) -dffr = o'D3 rn'
B.crlon fo!
I radlar effective €€,sk t sea,tjns
f
), locatlon of g.sk t load reaction' fabk
frary. 2_5'2
h hub
fi
K--
olcttca6
W d= 22'o'2(o.4)t) = 22'o ' 0'866
G = 21'1?r in'
Y
r. hub l.Drth, r, i-'JE . \\n r"-;;l;; . ,.0,,,
2. c.nt€r 11n. bolt cilclc to hub l (r.j)Db _ tly h r 3,00 1!.
3, DlntltlD bolr cllc]e itl.ecrcr for ! o.j)(r,25) - r.875 tly R.2.00 1n.
4. bo,, Bpaclna - g rn. or (2.25ror):'.;Xn; ]',:,i'li:.', trrC.24,0in.
r. nu!b!! of bot!! . r(21.0)/2.Er r 26,s
t?y 24 bolr!
DESICT COIIDIIIOI{S
pcrrurc,r- 525 pri t!op.!.tu!.. @! C - O.3o UG-34(d)
5. Sk.tch of bllniM!!8'
2-Ll2 La,
1/4 tn.
a,zt6
AT,LOI'A3II STRESSES
II'IESS CAI,CI'IJITIONS
lolgl.tudtral hub .tt.!3r
- (fu) /(r.e
S"
!!dl.el fLrs. .tr!!!, sR - (€x)/(!t") -
!raa6!t.l fhng. !rr..., S- - (nt/
3,Zoo
664 66!
APPTNDII APPENDIX
Dolo Sh€ca for Relnforcement Calcula ons (UG_37. .40)
R€inforcement Cslculations for l8'Inch
Manway
corroslon alloe.rc.
0.063 1n.
,.'.'""til,?i ?fi:l:;:li ii::tt.;'*' salr'!hlcraeE6 . 10,310 1!.
lDltd. r.d1us of .h.Il,--elr-rr-qr erora r.Cr--, e- .lsr,-^t.-n
---r.a&.-(!p.clfy) .bcfolc corro.io! atlorarc. 1. lddcd ..,,.,., a,
.Fh.-1o.1 .. -* E*i"tJd ""-t. ".u['j..'i,;'e6su!' ln Dozzl€ - 9,450 h rb.
L, K.D t8 1p. - 16,260 rb. cot!.
!oEl 1 thlchr.!3, .xclulive of corroslon ltloelnc. . . . . . . , . .. (s25) (18) (1.72)
Elnlelr !€qut!.d thtches3 (!.fe!cnce uc_27) .€! .hc.r 4
....,..,. 0.687 ln. v'63'r r'au tbtckncss
. 15, 000 h 1!.
. ... ., ,... . t! 0.550 1n. '. "'.Ti!o8i ?;;"b'?i:,;llo;i"'o'
(.500) (z) (1.72) (15,000) 25,800 1!. co!r.
.
".''iii.!Li"i"ti,$l-;:llii;,'": :":":::*
iio:iioi - is,iso r.rzl'10,310+ e'550
1.5,860
19,E50
lb, .6t.
$' cor!.
" r'hfolc'Dent
t- Lo.it to b€ csrrlcd by rdd'd . 124'840 lb. .5t.
.xc.33 lhlcla.us 333.000 - 192'300 - 15'660 120'840 t!. cor!'
.,.,..r !_r, 0.137 ln iillooo - rsz'loo - 19'850 (h ' 1'72 1D')
2. Nozzl.
8. Are! tcqul!.d of add'd !'b!o!c€o'dt . ?.13 h.2 cst'
lrtellal ! r.&t€.s ar..l plpe.
ur.d 5A_106. clad€ ! (Sch 40) 124,840/17,500
'' -* :i.'fi"*"";inl',i'i:*
E :ri!ur! .11@rbt. srr.l3
ln3td. dl.roete! of flnt6hed op€ing h colrod€d cordltlon .
r.5.000
'**ii"vi-il4' :ttt?l rD bv 27'5 ,o'b o! . .-.^.
('75) ('7s) (2) (1/2)
' 7't2 ta'Z
corlos1on ellorance".,""",...
. .....,.,.....,..
",.,... :,''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
. .....,,,................. s t7.500 prl ,. ".i::i!},::;":"1:;iii,f;:il hcrd e'r'1'chlct$esa - 5,110 Lb.
c h, not'le
rnsl.e redlu. or she11, o! ,,",." ;;;';;;;";:
;_.;;;;;"'..
0.063
4. Iolit crrrl.d by lotzle tr1l 'lu' to P!t'6ur€ 1n
- 2,350h Ib.
tphellca] radlus (!p.crfy) beror€ corro6r.or (525) (4.50) (b)
itro,aac€ 1s of nozlle erU outBlde of h'rd thlcv'lle63
add.d ,. ..... .. ,. ,. .. 5. 6t!en8th -
:: t'#*
8'220b Lb.
(.2?4) (h) (2) (r5,Ooo)
;:$": .' .: :: ::
H*lll"L!i";'i1"""1:'x;:uc-37(b)' 6. 6tt.Ee!h of Dozzl. r.11 rvrtl'bl' fo!
"' .'i,iii"iielito--
r'1Efolc'Deal
('3!' h'1)
z,rso)c') - 11,000 ]b. .3t.
uA-4(d) t! - 9,160 lb. .o!r.
E ' r, !t. 1 """' ll* 5,140 + 4,020
load to b. crrrl.d bt tildcd rebfotc'ocnt Ib. crt.
cxce88
'' .rE!ffi:E - i-#-4j+Ar=-sEi 33:333 : 8i:i331*;13!'- 5E,600 - {4,740
-
-
10,400
13,850 lb, corr.
thlckle6.
2. Nozzl€ """"1"" t-t! rr.! t!qu1r.d of tildcil tclafolc" !! b. Itt
- 0.694 6q.
eat.riat used: s€apl€ss ,tett ptpe. 10,400/15,000
S4_106, clade B, schedule 80 Fc! of rclDfolc.lcnt u!.d: tson 5/8 tnch f1l1'! a'eldt
Da:(letrD aUoralte st!!3s
.. ,...,.. iiJa.'.iii'i-rr"" cxtcnsto! Eo22]' Inlld€ of h'rd
s 15.000 p.r (.525) ( ' 625) (' 5) (4)
- .781 tq. b.
lns1i'e i,rsDete! of frEtsh€i, .".,,;;.;;.;;;;.; ldcldEr - .342 sq. b.
;;;;;;;;.....:..: d aor21.: (.625) ('274) (2)
DcelDar. thrck..s. e*.lusive 3.9s1 1p.
or ..r;""r""
lb'
,hlcknes. r€qu1led ., o*".L *#
"rr*"--^:--
**,"'iiXl,i']lllll......:. :.. :.. "ii98il tii,iSS'i'iS?i,iili3', - 18,810
,
MATERIAL SPECITICATIONS
Tubes
Seamless
MATERIALS FOR PROCESS NICKEL AND NICKEL A[oY ASME 5B-163' specify alloy and
temper'
ALLoy
coppER AND coppER
iiil| |i.lll, |fl-1,il llli ill lilill.
Welded
resistance welded'
CARBoN STEEL ASME SA-214' electric
SA-249' specify grade'
HIGII Au-oY STBEL ASME
ShelIs,Chonne|s,Covers,F|ootingHeods,TubesheEts,ondF|onges
PtPe
G^rade B or Grade A'
CARBoN STEEL ASME 5A-106 seamless' A'
ASME SA-53 Grade B or Grade
NTCKEL AND Nrcrcr Ar,roy. ASME 58_162, specify ternper. ALUI"ff.IUM AND ALUMINUM ALLoY' ASME SB-247' specify alloy and
temper.
ASME SB-127, specifu temper.
ASME 58-168, specig temper. Bolting
Al-ulvrtrutvr AND AruMtrnM Aury. ASME SB_209, specify alloy and Stu/s artd Stttd Bolts
Emper.
Au,oY STEEL. ASME SA-193, specify grade'
CoppER AND CoppER Arioy. ASME SB_ll, specify type.
ASME 58_96, specify alloy. NICKEL AND NICKBL ALt oY ASME 58-160' specify temper'
ASME 5B-169, speci$ alloy and temper. ASME 58-164, specify temper and class'
ASME SB_171, specig altoy. ASME 58-166, sPecifY temPer.
ASME 58402, specify alloy.
ATLoY ASME SB-2 I 1 ' specify ailoy and
ALu\,m{uM AND ALUMINUM
Castings temDer.
A. Code PolicY
Pressure Vessel.Commiftee to
1. It is ttle policy of the ASME Boiler and
'' ;d.il;.'i;;il.ion s""ti* n onlv such Specifications that have been
in
for Testing and Materials
adopted by the Amencan Society
approval will normally be for
2. lt is expected that requests foi CoatSp#fication.
APPENDX F materials for which tn.r. ,.'t'nSiV
For other materials'
to develop a Specification which can
request should be rnuO" to 'CiTN{
Le^oresented to the Code Codmittee'
REQUIRED DATA FOR
B. MechonicolProPerlies
MATERIAL APPROVAL IN THE l. Together with the Specification for
the material'-the inquirer shall
sfess
fumish
values for
to but" ailoyalte
the Committee with uO"qout" ouil-on-*ttl"h
ASME SECTION VIII CODE inclusion in the applicable stress ible'
The data shall include
elongation' creep strength'
values of ultimate
and stress-
il;;;;dd."l.futh, reductio;i;a'
and welded joints over the.lang:-1f-.temperatures
rupture strength of base metar
etty treatment that is required to produce
at which the materiut i, to u" ot"O'
healt
ue'fuiii Ott"tiu"o' Adequate data,on the notch
the tensile properties strouto
ii"titt temperatures must he furnished'
toushness in the proposed
'ung"
temp;;a;iunge contimpluted witl be usetul to the
Seriice experience in the
Committee.
2'Ifthematerialistobeusedinvesselstooperate.underextemalpressure,
sfess-strain curves (tension titp*1ti*l shall be fumished for a range of
"t
design temPerature desired'
C. WeldobilitY
intended
data on the weldability^of material
The inquirer shall furnish complete tests
and performance
for welding including <lata on piocedure secton 'qlalification
x
w-etaing tests shall be
made in accordanc" *itr' t'"
or
"qliitt"nis which the
i" material is to be used'
made over the full range tr friJt""tt to ar
Pertinent information, such ul t'"ut tt"ut-"nr.Jequ]red: -suj::etibility
be given'
in *elding the material shall
ffi;;;; il;ount or
"*p"ti"nt"
D. PhYsicol Chonges
characteristics and the degree of
It is important to know the structural stability
-^i
i"tpttutut". of new materials' The
retention of properties *itft "-pJt*t treat-
as forming' welding' and thermal
influence of fabricution p'""ui"i totft
ments of the mech*i""f p"p"tt[t '
Jo"iiltty' .-d ti'tt":At:: of the material
i"r'"i" a degraclarion in eroe-el::.Tav be cool-
encoun-
;fi.i,ilil;il"'i"irv *n'ges of exposure or heat Eeatment'
tered. Where particot' t"tp"'ut*"
672
6f4
E. Potenls
The inquirer shall state whether or not the material is covered by patents
and
APPENDIX G
whether or not it is licensed and if licensed the limitations on its manufacturt.
F. Code Cose
F O R P ROV
ID IN G
.
P NOC-T
..-DATA
O U NE
FOR CODE CHARTS
In exceptional circumstances, the Code Committee will consider the issuance
of
a Code Case effective for a period of three years permitting the use
of a material
provided that the following conditions are mec -FOR
l. The inquirer provides evidence that a specification for the material ic
EXTERNAL PRESSURE
before ASTM.
The material is commercially available and can be purchased within tho
DESIGN
specified range of chemical and tensile requiements and other require-
ments described in B.
The inquirer shows that there will be a reasonable demand for the mate-
rif by industry and that there exists an urgency for approval by meang
of a Code Case.
The request for approval of the rnaterial shall clearly describe it in ASTM
Spelincatiol foll, including such items as scope, process, manufacturc,
conditions for delivery, heat teatment, chemical and tensile requ E-
ments, bending properties, testing specifications and requirements,
workmanship, finish, marking, inspection and rejection.
5. The inquirer shall furnish the Code Committee with all the data specified
inB0oE.
675
676 APPENDI
q aPPENDIX 677
On occasion the ASME Boiler and pressure Vessel Committee is rcqucsrctr ((r l. The nrinirnurn specilied yield strength or yield point (statc which) as
provide for a new material chan for external pressure design such ai thosc irr given in the specifications for the material.
Appendix V of Section VIII, Division l. The SGDE/SCD requires reliable rlttu 2. Stress-strain curves representative of the material at the following tem-
upon which to base the construction of charts. The SG is not in a position to perarures:
develop or evaluate the required data. Consequently, the SGDE recommends thc (a) Ambient (room) temperature.
following procedures to be followed in providing the SG with adequate and
reliable data.
(b) The highest temperature for which coverage is desired'
(c) One or more intermediate temperatures as may be desirable to
1, The compiling and evaluation of material data are rightfully the re- facilitate interpolation on the chart.
sponsibility of the Subcommittee on hoperties of Me1ds. The threc Temperatures at some multiple of 100'F are preferred'
subgroups involved would be the SG on euenched and Tempered Steel,
The shess-strain curves should extend to at least the 0'37o offset point
the SG Strength-Steel and High Temperature Alloys, and the SC (to ensure being able to obtain reliable values of the tangent modulus to
Strength-Nonferrous Alloys.
O.2Vo offset). Consideration should be given to extending tests to higher
2. Upon receipt of an inquiry for a new chart, the secretary should refer the values of strain for possible future use with stress intensity values in the
inquiry ro the appropriate SG of SCp. The SG shall ditermine whether elasto-plastic range. (This is much less expensive than to run additional
or not adequate data are available or whether the inquirer shall be re- tests at a later date.)
quested to supply the required data. The SG should screen and
evaluate Stress-strain curves in compression are preferred. It is recomrnended
the data and forward them to the SGDE with their commenrs or recom_
that compression tests be made in accordance with ASTM Specification
mendations. The Materials SG should clearly identify the material and
E-9, Standard Methods of Compression Testing of Metallic Materials'
define its use as to product form and, where applicabie, any restrictions
on the method of fabrication of the completed pressure vesiel (i.e., heat Stress-strain curves from tension tests will be acceptable if there is
heatment or welding limitations). sufficient background of information to show that there is no substantial
difference between the stress-strain characteristics of the material in
3. It is su€gested that, to expedite processing of inquiries, a specific individ_
tension and compression. Data should indicate whether tension or com-
ual might in some cases be designated as the member iesponsible for
pression tests were made.
liaison with SGDE. This member would be responsible for the trans-
mission of approved data to SGDE. 3. The expected properties of the material at the temperatures described
above, for material having the minimum specified properties, are as
description of the data required for proper preparation of the design charts follows:
_ _A
follows. It is felt that these are minimum requirements for the preparation of (a) Yield strength or yield point (state which).
reliable charts. The use of so-called typical stress-strain curves based on a
statistically significant volume of data may be satisfactory if the region between
(b) Proportional limit.
the proportional limit and the yield shength is accurately reprisented. The (c) Elastic modulus (state whether by the dynamic method or from
developrnent of the tangent modulus in this region is a critical step. It is sug- stress-strain curves).
gested that this description be prepared in a form suitable for attachment to any 4. The condition of the material as stated in the specifications, for example,
requests for material data from an inquirer. annealed, hot finished. cold drawn. temper. and so on'
A copy follows of a description of the method used to derive the material 5. Stated whether intended for welded construction. The above data should
curves on the charts directly from the laboratory stress-strain curves. It was felt properly include the effect of the heat of welding on the properties of the
that this procedure might enable the Materials Subgroups to better evaluate our rnut".iut. It it acceptable in such cases to use data for the material in the
data requirements. The balance of the lines on the chart are functions of the annealed condition .
geometry of the vessel, and so do not change with material of construction. 6. The inquirer should supply data from at least three specimens at each
temperature and that these specimens should preferably be taken from
more than one "production lot" or "heat."
DATA NEEDED BY THE SG EXTERNAL PRESSURE FOR THE
PREPAMTION OF CODE CHARTS FOR EXTERNAL PRESSURE DESIGN
For the use of the SG on Strength Properties and the SG on Nonferrous Mate_
nals.
,.Q
^i
iiri
.t:
ir
APPENDX H
CORROSION CHARTS
"i?
I
i:t
i:t
trl
t"t
I rl
1"t
t"l
I 8l
| 31
l;t
l3l
tl
i
t^t
rl 3l
!l il
't"l
tI
,t .:t
't"l
ri
il
rlll r ll'i il i '1.'ll
I
i
i
;
!
ill:il:lilt .:- l
-l
ti t::
t^""
lr li litl
ti lit ti
i
i ,G
I i
.i
tw
Ti
ii *l
:l
rii ^",1
;r*-
l% Ti "l
.!l iil
it tl
IT
t; t:
il
680 68r
;{
APPENDIX
l
I
l
I
i..
:l!:9,
l
l
lrl
ll
l
642
683
t-. I
oll ^l
El sl ol ql I
qt
ol al
ol*
@l
nl
ilr-lc-l
?l
xl ..
*
RI
oqlg
u'^ +l* ol cr o16
EE qt +l* +l& +l& c.l
JI- /rl lle.l
r..t |
6dt :l 8 U^ Tl
I
aa v)
&l el I
a.t {l €l =l
ill
vl
C] [.l \l EI
wl
-:t q,l AI {il
r* ls "l;
l- ll @lo
9^ l.E le lo I
fte
='d sl? *F
l&
-lg 11
q) sl+ nl? Hl; n[ nle ;l:
Fd ta(
$l?
IE la
ul* afu lo< la< lo Klt l\rr lr
lE ro
li
fr.
lc^l
re lt lft rq l* lt lr-
(l)^ sl* lft la ld ^l-
El; El* dlL El*
Fl+ > t>
t?
!.=
rl? rl? Rl? gII FII ri)
3 lu lR .it., !1\ ld
lu lH
(ir v
R
lR tca
lc.l l+
lH ltrl
l?r
lc.l
cil
E E --^S*
:l
A
g, F* F, gest E E $ *EEl" H*
Bg $e :t $Eg 'l tE .i
e
$e $
685
6U
Toble J.l Roundobouf lt Full X-Royed
FULL S POT
SEAMLESS SEAMLESS
F X-RAY X RAY
FULL SPOT
L SEAMLESS SEAMLESS
L X-RAY X_RAY
FULL SPOT
SEAMLESS SEAMLESS SEAMLESS
n X'RAY X.RAY
FULL S POT
SEAMLESS sEAMLESS SEAMLESS
L
L X-RAY X. RAY
697
Tobb J.3 Roundqbout lr Spor X-Royed
l-l- NO 5EAIVLEsS SEAMLESS
X-RAY
FULL SPOT
SEAMLESS
L X-RAY X-RAY
J, E. .85 LO t.o
HEAD sf.R
too% 63 lo 6)./o
APPENDX K
J.E LO .85 R5
>=
q u-, ^t^
t 6)
^-O/ /o too% roo% SIMPLIFIED CURVES FOR
SHFI
EXTERNAL LOADING ON
I
tA SPOT
SEAMLESS SEAMLESS sEAMLESS
D X- RAY
FU LL SPOT
tL SEAMLESS SEAMLESS
X- RAY X-RAY
Nr
M,
/\,'^
/No
:
\:
\" L
3
J J
z
Bending str$s = I(, [,| tt".ottd"tMcD K,lNv,i)ld"Tll'l"ll
#, Mambrane 3tres =
=
-_//
7l-
/
0.001 0.q)1
0. t0 1.0 '1.0 10.o
| 0.0 0,r0
'' ,/D-r
Figut K. I t'{o.crt tl6 a @"/ tn) duc to an ex".nol cir.",mfrronr'ror mon,.nr ,,L on o circuro. cyrnd".. (d"/'{i.) luc to on trLrnol mofieni i'lc on o cird,,lor qlind€r'
figurc K,2 , .mbrono forct N6,a
690 691
'.,Mm*-- . ., ?rL!!4. .rrlllltrtr
t4s
Mo
\ 0.t 0
'".,,**j"ilj;*N E
\o
cq
{
Bendins strels = ff, t,nr', lr,rr.,, Mombrane stress = *"t*,,,, to.rtr7lffi
" * \t 0.01
\T\\-
''1
\
0.001 0.001
0.10 0.10 r 0.0 1.0
r = --js-
,E_r
F'o'rrcK'3,{om*r,{k,(d./roducroon.xtlmor '/D.r
ro.,girudinor mom.nr /lt on o cir.oror cy'indor. Fig!ru X.,t lrt mbrsn€ tor.e NF,a (d"t/r.) doe to on €xlrrnol nomcnl 14 on o circulor Eylindar.
692
693
."'!M'RF'*..-
t.o I I | | | lll
-
=\
\
0.10
D!,lT
N
3
;a
Bonding gtre$ = ,(, (ttt', d /
=
Eenditg rtre$ = tr, {it(,
0.01
,00f
T
'- \
2(x) V
6m
0.001 I tl I ttl
0.r0 1.0 to.o 0.10 1.0
- 'lo a= 7"1./6)T
,/DF
Figir. K.6 Bcnding mdnGnt ir(,,it.lu.lo on.xtornol rodiol lood on o cirorhr cylinder' 't'l'/Pon longi|vdlnol
Fi$r. K.5 Lnding morn€nt t{(&A du. lo on od.rnof rodiol food P on o .ir.ulor qlindf'. tl/p on oxi., l,|,/P on lrols€rt. qxb.
longihdinol arb, ,t{a/P on frunwrn <uit.
695
694
F*-- ., --,
'!U;|F "a?.e!.r,ry@!
1.0
I tt tl tttl
\.",
ri t--
e
{ J
E
0.00t
0.10 1.0 0.001
0.10 1.0
,/aA ./87
Figuro K.7 rrtemhrone iorce r.,h,a t/p due io on .x|€rnsl rodiol lood p on a cirorlor
cylind.r (rqnw.r.. orh).
Figure K.8 ,rt mbrcnc lorc6 N(,rI/P due io on sxi.rnol rodiol lood P on o cirsrlor <ylinder (loqgiludiml
arir).
696
697
-,wF6'-*- .,.._.-*".- *rr'w'|
Converrlon to SI Unltr
699