THE TYRANNY
OF WORDS
»
STUART CHASE
METHUEN & CO. LONDON
96 Bisex Stat, Stand, W.CACKNOWLEDGMENT
book tan experiment. Tt posible o explain words
Nh won? Can ome ofthe veton why rao diel,
wt to commaniate with one another by meate ef
gee ot forth In that sume ky medium? Te is
Bibs reat'n Ew bots vite hare broadened sry
Mlertandig ofthe world in which T ve, These cont
lions Tere atemp to pas on. To them I kave added
ch istrative uate ands few concluons of my
fi. The subject dealt with—human communication”
worst me fr many years 1 elve worries tery
‘who thinks abow lacquage at all Doct B now
A is ling about?” Does A himsc know cleasy
he ie talking about? How often do tinds met,
st do they completely mi each other? Tow
yo the worlds mlorenes are duc to nich mies?
Wa rule of ths unesines T long ago fermlatd a
ules whic tied to fllow in my twriing a tl
py wre on the cge ofthe mij wich coment
Wh this book. Tn de time 1 found certain hen who
ereteted. belly into the heart cf the nbjecy
with tols of anmls more sharp than any
Hie flow Bebind them here. T do ott all chat
tll, YeeasneT'do not understand al tht they tl
Ms isnot « Bul and crcl secemt of he fogs
vives esploers ato the jngle of words, bat only am
of what 1 fowed” peronally ittninatog” and
il. To Ali Korsyini, GK. Open, A. Richards,
hl W. Bridgman T tader my proud grate for
ep tney have extended, and alk ther indulgens for
a have let unsaid To ET. Bel, Lancelot Hoghen,
fran W. Armeld, B.S. Reb, Jerome, Fran
it abled Gt Bri ivw “TUE TyRANGY OF woRDs
Walon Hasiton, Henshaw Ward, ae other quoted i
the text Yam ony les indebeed,
"The manuscript has been read and cried in wha
‘orin part by Walter N.Polakov, John and Frances Gun
Dr. and Mrz Hugh H. Darby, Baset Jones, Raymon
Gran 'Swing, and. Morris Ernst. My debt to them
fit, TL. M, Feine and Beverly Magee typed the et
anuscrpt tice and eootiboted variws valuable mgy
ton My son, Robert Harfeld Chas, consented to
the part of guinea pig, marking in green. penal U
Doron ofthe manus ot leet him, 8 boy of ten
bre. This was dove on the perhaps not anwarrant
{Geumption that if Harvard undergraduate could und
fond the text any ineligent vader could understand i
He proved fie, conscientious guinea pig and Tam grat
tohlm. My le Marian Tyler Chase, ba given unsparing
tothe time and ciel neligence in reading, revising,
flocumenting the manmerpt, My gratitude to bir is
pei SD Ma itis ker, ap polow tome
been most amiable in allowing himself and hi afais
bbe inquired into during the couse of this study. As
wil ge, he comes clone to being the Beto of the story
Finally T should ke emphatically to point out tha
the semantic dscipline se set forth in. hese pages
ered primarily with objective. reaonaipe bet
the individual ad the outside word, between the "me
And the “"beyond-me” Into thow’sobjective relat
‘hips inside the "my" the paychoogieal domain of moti
‘asocition paths, complete, Guatons, and he rest,
Ive not seiusly ventred I do not know enough.
Geldof semantics, broadly interpreted, includes this acea
Sobjecive rladons alfet many of te problems which
ve here considered from the point of view of comm
tion. T urge more competent adents to extend and
Iu the analy in Geld, an analyse whieh Team
indicate
Redisg, Comme
STUART cHASt
Seen, 1997
CONTENTS
‘WORDS
Having weten a numberof books, your author
‘hk show vet Gad out the mre of he
trot he ut bern te condenly wg, DO
ade ino wht he ear by tse war?
‘Doe he Know bel? Surpeiingro f h
inal evestaaion.
lur Il, § LOOK ROUND THE MODERN
WORLD
Diactrour fics f ad Inguge a th lg
ttle beer Peient tnd Supreme Cour
Puli egal an enema hung peer.
revit fe mar verel poo te Unie
Sitar The neal or 2 coer omaaton of he
(Chjer 1H, INSIDE, AND OUTSIDE
Wat plot and nurlogits ave 0 sll
(rales ham the work ovis te
ne inde” How hese te Seah
the pater ofthe ewe wee! the macro:
‘top, raopie and eoicrnapse levee
Tioeracaning gett, and ow mitre
fat of te trvonmet in wich ve ve
‘ingest sree of the pei Bad anges
cra power aaaurval agent
lor 1A WRITER IN SEARCH OF HIS pcx