The Liberty Union
P.0. 80x 602
ESSEX JUNCTION. VERMONT 05452
=:
SANDERS FOR GOVERNOR
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 864-7061
My name is Bernard Sanders. 1 am formally announcing today my
intention to seek the Liberty Union nomination for Governor of Vermont.
I want to say here and now that there ia no doubt in my mind that the
candidates of the Liberty Union Party will do far better than we have
ever done before, I also want to say that we are in this race to win.
The fundamental and over-riding issue in this campaign is whether
the people who vresently own and control the state of Vermont - and the
nation - should be allowed to maintain their positions of incredible
power. In my opinion the heads of the multi-billion dollar banks and
corporations, and their political representatives in Washington and
Montpelier, have had their chance, and they have failed miserably, It
is time for them to move over, quickly, and for the oppressed people of
this state and nation - the people who work for a living - to take
immediate control of the economy if we are to survive.
In America today 2% of the population owns more than 1/3 of the
national wealth, which includes 80% of the publicly owned stock and
virtually all of the local, state and federal tax exempt bonds. At
a time when 30,000 Vermonters are unable to find jobs, when approximate-
ly 50,000 workers earn less than $3,00 an hour, when many of our elderly
people peep are facing severe economic deprivation, the gap between
the rich and the poor - both in Vermont and the nation - is growing
wider,
The major question that I will attempt to address during the course
of this campaign is the-following: How can the people of our state&
Dest use the state's wealth, natural resources, and labor force in
order to provide a decent standard of living for all Vermonters.
During the coming months of this campaign John Francoyand I will be
releasing a number of specific proposals directly relating to that
question. For the moment, however, in this first statement of the
campaign, I will respond to that question in general terms.
1 am unalterably oprosed to the continued economic blackmail of
this state by the giant banks and corporations. From New York City to
chi1e, from Italy to Vermont, the huge multi-billion dollar banks and
corporations make the essential decisions which determine how people
will live, or die. In New York Gity, for example, the government of
that city has completely abdicated its role as‘S representative of the
people there and has been replaced by the banker's dominated Emergency
Financial Control Board, In the underdeveloped world, 3rd world
countries are in debt to the major banks to the tune of $100 billion
dollars - and many of the economies of the developing world are
completely dominated by these banks.
In Vermont, the control of Wall Street and the wealthy over this
state is easily seen, Several examples will suffice. Bverybody knows
that the vast majority of people in this state are thoroughly dicgusted
and oprosed to the outrageous utility rate increases of thepast few
years, With such wideppread opposition how does state government,
which presumably representas the people, allow these rate increases to
go through. From Tom Salmon to Stella Hackel to Richard Snelling - and
to virtually every Democrat and Republican - the answer is the same,
these people claim “We have to give these companies the rate of return
they want or else they will not invest their capital in Vermont and
vtinity service here will deteriorate." Also, according to these
Democrats and Republicans, the banks and wealthy individuals who own
these companies have " a right to a fair return on their investment
2and it would be illegal and immoral to deprive them of that right.”
Thus, either the people of this state are forced to pay outrageous
utility rates, or they suffer inadaquate service. Although there is
@ "right" for wealthy investors to get a “fair return on their invest-
ment," there is no such "right" for working people to get cheap and
adaquate utility service, This is economic blackmail. We either give
the individuals who own thesecompanies what they want - or we suffer,
in Vermont we have a tax structure which is thoroughly regressive
and unfair. People who earn $5000 a year pay larger percentage of
thier income in taxes to state and local government than do people who
earn $50,000 a year - and thecorporate income tax brings in less revenue
than the cigarette tax, This, despite the fact that the top 3% of
Vermont's income recipients earn as much money as do the bottom og.
And what do the Democrats and Republicans say about this legalized
robbery? Without exception, their response is the same, They say that;
“We have to give tax breaks to the corporations and wealthy individuals
or else they'll leave the state and go elsewhere. If we don't give ther
what they want they'll move to New Hampshire, or Mississippi or Hong
Kong - and we'Bl have fewer jobs and less sobial services than we pre-
sently do." Once again - economic blackmail, Either wé get down on
our knees and beg the corporations tocome here and exploit us - granting
them tax breaks, cheap labor and direct state aid - or they'al go some-
where else and, presumably, we'll be worseoff than before.
Despite the fact that many low income and working people are suffer-
ing serious economic hardship during this deptession period, the Vermont
State Legislature recently made substantial cuts in education, social
servicesand health care, At a time when people desperately need more
help from the government, they are getting less. Why? The Democrats
and Republicans say that if we don't cut government spending our “credit