Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PAST TECHNOLOGIES
C.A. Young§ and T.S. Jordan, Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Montana Tech,
Butte, MT 59701
ABSTRACT
Cyanide (CN-) is a toxic species that is found predominantly in industrial effluents
generated by metallurgical operations. Cyanide's strong affinity for metals makes it
favorable as an agent for metal finishing and treatment and as a lixivant for metal
leaching, particularly gold. These technologies are environmentally sound but require
safeguards to prevent accidental spills from contaminating soils as well as surface and
ground waters. Various methods of cyanide remediation by separation and oxidation are
therefore reviewed. Reaction mechanisms are given throughout. The methods are
compared in regard to their effectiveness in treating various cyanide species: free
cyanide, thiocyanate, weak-acid dissociables and strong-acid dissociables.
KEY WORDS
cyanide, metal-cyanide complex, thiocyanate, oxidation, separation
§
Corresponding author.
(y-x)R4NCl + M(CN)xy-x →
Fe(CN)64- + 2M2+ → M2Fe(CN)6(s) (11)
(R4N)y-xM(CN)6(s) + (y-x)Cl- (13)
HOCH2CN(aq) + H2O →
In the Degussa process, hydrogen peroxide
HOCH2CONH2(aq) (24b)
is used to chemically oxidize cyanide [117].
Hydrogen peroxide is an oxidant stronger Cyanate and ammonium ions are also ob-
than oxygen but weaker than ozone. It is tained as by-products. (3) When sulfuric
often considered better because it is rela- acid and hydrogen peroxide are mixed, a
tively cheap, water soluble, and easy to highly exothermic reaction occurs, forming
handle and store. The Degussa process persulfuric or Caro's acid, H2SO5. Caro's
has been examined in several research acid readily decomposes to oxygen and
efforts, especially for comparing to other sulfuric acid and, therefore, must be made
processes [118-125]. Results of these on site at the time of use. It reacts with
studies show that hydrogen peroxide reacts cyanide to produce cyanate [123, 129]:
with cyanide to produce cyanate and, when
added in excess, nitrite and carbonate and, -
CN- + H2SO5(aq) → OCN + H2SO4(aq) (25)
eventually, nitrate form:
Similar reactions occur for thiocyanate and
CN- + H2O2 → OCN + H2O
-
(23a) WADs; however, SADs do not react. Test
work has also shown that hydrocyanic gas
OCN- + 3H2O2 →
NO2- + CO32- + 2H2O + 2H+ (23b)
volatilization is negligible in spite of the fact
that an acid is being added and produced.
NO2- + H2O2 → NO3- + H2O (23c) This is attributed to fast reaction rates and
the inability of SADs to volatilize since equi-
Otherwise, the cyanate will hydrolyze ac- librium pH is established between 6.5 and
cording to Reaction 15. The Degussa proc- 8 (see Reaction 6). Reactions similar to
ess is successful at oxidizing most WADs Caro's acid were also noted with persulfate,
but has little or no effect on thiocyanate S2O82-.
and SADs. Even so, it has been incorpo-
rated into numerous mining operations in Alkaline chlorination has been practiced
Canada and the U.S. as a primary cyanide ever since cyanide leaching of gold was
destruction process as well as a stand-by commercially developed in 1889 and, con-
process for emergency situations. sequently, has been the most commonly
applied technique for cyanide destruction
Other chemicals can be added to increase [18, 28, 109, 130-132]. As will be ex-
reaction rates and efficiencies of hydrogen plained, alkaline chlorination removes toxic
peroxide: cupric cation, formalde- WAD and free cyanide species completely,
hyde/Kastone reagent and sulfuric acid [1]. quickly and economically. However, it suf-
Cupric cations act as catalysts for Reac- fers from high reagent costs regarding al-
tions 23a-c [2, 3] but can be consumed by kaline pH control and chlorine
precipitating ferrohexacyanide anions (see gas/hypochlorite consumption, high dis-
Reaction 11) [2]. Cyanide reacts with for- charge concentrations of chloride and hy-
maldehyde (HOCH) in the presence of pochlorite anions of which both are toxic,
DuPont's proprietary Kastone reagent to and inability to remediate SADs.
form glycolnitrile (HOCH2CN) which, in turn,
hydrolyses to glycolic acid amide Alkaline chlorination can be accomplished
(HOCH2CONH2) in the presence of hydro- using chlorine gas as discussed earlier for
gen peroxide [126-128]: electro-chlorination (see Reactions 19b and
19c):
Due to the high pH, sulfate and metal hy- 2OCN- + 3OCl- + H2O →
droxide precipitates are formed; however, N2(g) + 2CO2(g) + 3Cl- + 2OH- (32)
only WADs react according to Reaction
27b. SADs are inert. When in excess, chlo- Clearly, hydroxide consumption is minimal
rine gas can also react with cyanate to pro- and only becomes high when concentra-
duce nitrogen and carbon dioxide: tions of thiocyanate and WADs are high, as
indicated by Reactions 31a and 31b. To-
2OCN- + 3Cl2(g) + 4OH- → day, hypochlorite is predominantly added
N2(g) + 2CO2(g) + 6Cl- + 2H2O (28) as sodium or calcium salts since these
metal cations have natural buffering ten-
In such a case, chlorine and hydroxide dencies.
consumptions become excessive, only in-
creasing the difficulty in maintaining alkalin- The INCO process for cyanide destruction
ity above pH 10 to avoid the volatilization of involves mixing sulfur dioxide and air with
hydrocyanic and chlorocyanic gases. free and metal-complexed cyanide as well
as thiocyanate to yield cyanate [133-137]:
To compensate for this high base con-
sumption, the hypochlorite alkaline chlori- CN- + SO2(g) + H2O + O2(g) →
nation process was adapted due, in princi- OCN- + H2SO4(aq) (33a)
ple, to observations that the hypochlorite
that was produced by the hydrolysis of M(CN)xy-x + xSO2(g) + xH2O + xO2(g) →
xOCN- + xH2SO4(aq) + My+ (33b)
chlorine gas also remediated cyanide:
SCN- + 4 SO2(g) + 5H2O + 4O2(g) →
Cl2(g) + 2OH- → Cl- + OCl- + H2O (29)
OCN- + 5H2SO4(aq) (33c)
In this regard, hypochlorite reactions are Reactions 33a-c can be catalyzed with cu-
similar to those depicted for chlorine gas pric or nickel cations; however, SADs do
(see electro-chlorination). For example, hy- not react. Since the reactions generate
pochlorite and cyanide react, producing sulfuric acid and are most efficient near pH
chlorocyanogen which, in turn, hydrolyses 9, lime is added for pH control. This gen-
to cyanate (see Reaction 19c): erates sludge due to metal hydroxide and
gypsum precipitation which, as noted ear-
CN- + OCl- + H2O → CNCl(aq) + 2OH- (30a)
lier, can be difficult to clarify (see Reactions
CNCl(aq) + 2OH- → OCN- + Cl- + H2O (30b) 7 and 8). The INCO process has been in-
corporated into numerous mining opera-
Cyanate is also formed via hypochlorite re- tions in Canada and the U.S. since the
actions involving thiocyanate and metal- technology was commissioned in 1983.
complexed cyanides:
Table 1. Effectiveness of separation processes for cyanide remediation as discussed in this paper as modified and
updated from Ingles and Scott [18].
Table 2. Effectiveness of oxidation processes for cyanide remediation as discussed in this paper as modified and
updated from Ingles and Scott [18].
7. R.G. Rosehart, Mine Water Purification 16. G.K. Longe and F.W. DeVries, Some
by Reverse Osmosis, Can. J. Chem. Recent Considerations on the Natural
Eng., 51 (1973) 788-789. Disappearance of Cyanide, In: Proc.
Econ. and Practice of Heap Leaching in
8. L.T. Rozelle et al., Ultrathin Membranes Gold Mining, Cairns, Australia, 1988,
for Treatment of Waste Effluents by pp. 67-70.
Reverse Osmosis, Appl. Poly. Symp.
No. 22, 1973, pp. 223-239. 17. D.W. Grosse et al., Treatment Technol-
ogy Evaluation for Aqueous Metal and
9. G.W. Bodamer, Electrodialysis for Cyanide Bearing Hazardous Waste, J.
Closed Loop Control of Cyanide Rinse Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 41 (1991)
Waters, U.S. EPA Report No. EPA- 710-715.
600/2-77-161, 1977.
18. J.C. Ingles and J.S. Scott, Overview of
10. E. Hinden and P.J. Bennet, Water Cyanide Treatment Methods, Cyanide
Reclamation by Reverse Osmosis, in Gold Mining Seminar, Ontario, Can-
Water and Sewage Works, 116 (1979) ada, 1981.
66-73.
19. N. Hedley and H. Tabachnick, Chemis-
11. S.E. McGivney and P.R. Hoover, try of Cyanidation, American Cyanamid
Evaluation of Reverse Osmosis Mem- Co., New York, NY, 1958.
branes for Treatment of Electroplating
Rinsewater, U.S. EPA Office of Re- 20. H.H. Huang and H. Long, paper in
search and Development Report No. preparation, Montana Tech, Butte, MT,
EPA/600/2-80-84, 1980. 1995.
12. M.J. Nicol, C.A. Fleming and R.L. Paul, 21. M.N. Hughes et al., Oxidation of Metal
The Chemistry of the Extraction of Thiocyanates by Nitric and Nitrous Ac-
Gold, In: G.C. Stanley (Ed.), Extraction ids, Part II, Kinetics, J. Chem. Soc.,
Metallurgy of Gold in South Africa, 1969.
SAIMM, 1987.
22. T.I. Mudder and A.J. Goldstone, The
13. A.T. Kuhn, Electrolytic Decomposition Recovery of Cyanide from Slurries,
of Cyanides, Phenols and Thiocyanates Proc. Eng. and Min. J. Int. Gold Expo,
in Effluent Streams - A Review, J. Appl. Reno, NV, 1989, pp. 107-140.
Chem. Biotech., 21 (1971) 29-34.
23. W.J.S. Craigen and F.J. Kelly, Eco-
14. R.F. Roberts and B. Jackson, The De- nomic Evaluation of Cyanide Removal
termination of Small Amounts of Cya- Processes, CANMET, Energy Mines
nide in the Presence of Ferrocyanide by and Resources Canada, Lab Report
77-5, 1977.
29. J. Clennel, The Cyanide Handbook, 38. K. Tanihara et al., Treatment of Waste-
McGraw Hill, New York, NY, 1915. water Containing Iron Cyanide Com-
plexes, II, Precipitation Removal of Iron
30. W. Hutchings, Laboratory Experiments Cyanide Complexes by Simultaneous
on Aluminum and Zinc Dusts as Precipi- Dosage of Zinc Sulfate and Sodium
tants of Gold in Cyanidation Practice, Thiosulfate, Kyushu Kogyo Gij. Shik.
Can. Min. J., 10 (1949) 74-79. Hokoku, 31 (1983) 2005-2011.
31. E.A. van Hahn and T.R. Ingraham, Ki- 39. T.M. Hendrickson and L.G. Daignault,
netics of Silver Cementation on Zinc in Treatment of Complex Cyanide Com-
Alkaline Cyanide and Perchloride Acid pounds for Reuse or Disposal, U.S.
Solutions, Can. Met. Q., 7 (1968) 15- EPA Report No. EPA-R2-73-269,
26. Washington DC, 1973.
32. I.A. Kakovski and O.K. Scherbakov, Ki- 40. J. Ingles, The Treatment of Mine-Mill
netics of Noble Metal Cementation from Effluents for the Removal of Iron Cya-
Cyanide Solution, Izv. Akad. Nayk. nides, Mining and Metallurgical Divi-
S.S.S.R. Metall., 1 (1967) 76-85. sion, Environment Canada, 1981.
45. ASTM, Research Report D2036:19- 55. J.E. House, The Development of the
1131, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1987. LIX® Reagents, Min. Met. Process., 6
(1981) 1-6.
46. J.H. Espenson and J.G. Wolenuk, Jr.,
Kinetics and Mechanisms of Some 56. J.D. Miller and M.B. Mooiman, A Re-
Substitution Reactions of Penta- view of New Developments in Amine
cyanoferrate (III) Complexes, Inorg. Solvent Extraction Systems for Hy-
Chem., 11 (1972) 2034-2041. drometallurgy, Sep. Sci. and Tech., 19
(1985) 895-909.
47. A.F. Taggart, Handbook of Mineral
Dressing, John Wiley and Sons, New 57. M.B. Mooiman and J.D. Miller, The
York, NY, 1945. Chemistry of Gold Solvent Extraction
from Cyanide Solution Using Modified
48. A.M. Gaudin, Flotation, McGraw Hill Amines, Hydromet., 16 (1986) 245-261.
Book Co., New York, NY, 1957.
58. J.D. Miller et al., Selective Solvation
49. R.B. Grieves and D. Bhattacharyya, Extraction of Gold from Alkaline Cya-
Precipitate Flotation of Complexed nide Solution by Alkyl Phosphorous
Cyanide, Proc. 24th Ind. Waste Conf., Esters, Sep. Sci. and Tech., 22 (1987)
Purdue Univ., Lafayette, IN, 1969. 487-502.
50. A.K. Reed et al., An Investigation of 59. H.A.C. Montgomery, D.N. Gardiner and
Techniques for Removal of Cyanide J.G. Gregory, Determination of Free
from Electroplating Waste, Water Poll. Hydrogen Cyanide in River Water by a
63. G.A. Strobel, Cyanide Utilization in Soil, 72. E. Goldblatt, Recovery of Cyanide from
Soil Sci., 103 (1967) 299-302. Waste Cyanide Solution by Ion Ex-
change, Ind. Eng. Chem., 51 (1959)
64. J.S. Scott and J.C. Ingles, Removal of 241.
Cyanide from Gold Mill Effluents, Proc.
13th Annual Meeting of Canadian Min- 73. N.L. Avery and W. Fries, Selective Re-
eral Processors, Ontario, Canada, moval of Cyanide from Industrial Waste
1981. Effluents with Ion-Exchange, Ind. Eng.
Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 14 (1975) 102-
65. T.D. Chatwin and J.J. Trepanowski, 104.
Utilization of Soils to Mitigate Cyanide
Releases, In: Proc. 3rd Western Reg. 74. J.J. Trachentenberg and M.A. Murphy,
Conf. on Prec. Metals, Coal and Envi- Removal of Iron Cyanide Complexes
ron., SME, Rapid City, SD, 1987, pp. from Waste Water Utilizing an Ion Ex-
151-170. change Process, SME, Littleton, CO,
1979.
66. J. Zhang and J.L. Hendrix, Attenuation
of Cyanide in Soils, In: D.R. Gaskell 75. M. Akser, R.Y. Wan and J.D. Miller,
(Ed.), EPD Congress '91, TMS, War- Gold Adsorption from Alkaline Aurocy-
rendale, PA, 1991, pp. 677-686. anide Solution by Neutral Polymeric
Adsorbents, Solv. Ext. Ion Ex., 4 (1986)
67. R.C. Bansal, J.P. Donnet and F. 531-546.
Stoeckli, Active Carbon, Marcel Dekker,
Inc., New York, NY, 1988. 76. M. Akser et al., Synthesis of New
Phosphonate Ester Resins for Adsorp-
68. S. Honda and G. Kondo, Treatment of tion of Gold from Alkaline Cyanide So-
Wastewater Containing Cyanide Using lution, Met. Trans. B, 18 (1987) 625-
Activated Charcoal, Os. Kogyo Gij. 633.
Shik. Koho, 18 (1967) 367.
77. V.I. Lakshmanan and P.D. Tackaberry,
69. J.E. Huff and J.M. Bigger, Cyanide Advances in Gold and Silver Process-
Removal from Refinery Wastewater ing, In: M.C. Fuerstenau and J.L. Hen-
Using Powdered Activated Carbon,
84. J. Allen and G.A. Strobel, The Assimila- 94. U.S. EPA, Quality Criteria for Water
tion of HCN by a Variety of Fungi, Can. 1986, 440/5-86-001, U.S. EPA Office of
J. Microbiol., 12 (1966) 414-416. Water Regulations and Standards,
Washington, D.C. 20460, 1986.
85. B. Skowronski and G.A. Strobel, Cya-
nide Resistance and Cyanide Utilization 95. L.C. Thompson and R.L. Gerteis, New
by a Strain of Bacillus pumilus, Can. J. Technologies for Mining Waste Man-
Microbiol., 15 (1969) 93-98. agement: Biotreatment Processes for
Cyanide, Nitrates, and Heavy Metals,
86. P.A. Castric, Hydrogen Cyanide, a In: F.M. Doyle (Ed.), Mining and Mineral
Secondary Metabolite of Pseudomonas Processing Wastes, SME, Littleton, CO,
aeruginosa, Can. J. Microbiol., 21 1990, pp. 271-278.
(1975) 613-618.
96. L.C. Thompson, R. Fischer and S.W.
87. S. Raef, Fate of Cyanide and Related Beckman, SITE Demonstration of
Compounds in Aeration Microbial Sys- Bioremediation of Cyanide at the
tems, Water Research, 11 (1977) 477- Summitville Colorado Site, 21st Annual
492.
98. R.H. Howe, Bio-Destruction of Cyanide 107.J.E. Entwistle, The Electrolytic Proc-
Wastes - Advantages and Disadvan- essing of Cyanide Wastes, Effl. Water
tages, Int. J. Air Water Pollut., 9 (1965) Treat. J., 16 (1976) 123-128.
463-478.
108.W. Chen, H.L. Recht and G.P. Hajela,
99. R.D. Fallon, Evidence of a Hydrolytic Metal Removal and Cyanide Destruc-
Route for Anaerobic Cyanide Degrada- tion in Plating Wastewaters Using Par-
tion, Appl. Eviron. Microbiol., 58 (1991) ticle Bed Electrodes, U.S. EPA Report
3163-3164. No. EPA-600/2-76-296, 1976.
134.E.A. Devuyst, V.A. Ettel and G.J. Bor- 143.R. Venkatadri and R.W. Peters,
bely, Inco Method for Cyanide De- Chemical Oxidation Technologies; Ul-
struction in Gold Mill Effluents and traviolet Light/Hydrogen Peroxide,
Tailings Slurries, Proc. 14th Ann. Fenton's Reagent, and Titanium Diox-
Meeting of Can. Miner. Process., ide-Assisted Photocatalysis, Haz.
1982. Waste Haz. Mat., 10 (1993) 107-149.
135.E.A. Devuyst et al., A Cyanide Process 144.G.E. Burdink and M. Lipschuetz, Tox-
Using Sulfur Dioxide and Air, JOM, 12 icity of Ferro- and Ferricyanide Solu-
(1989) 43-45. tions to Fish and Determination of the
Cause of Mortality, Anal. Chem. Acta,
136.A. Zaidi et al., Evaluation of Inco's 49 (1970) 192-202.
SO2/Air Process for the Removal of
Cyanide and Associated Metals from 145.W.S. Rader et al., Sunlight-Induced
Gold Milling Effluents at McBean Mine, Photochemistry of Aqueous Solutions
Wastewater Technology Center Report of Hexacyanoferrate (II) and (III) Ions,
- Environment Canada, Burlington, Environ. Sci. Technol., 27 (1993)
Canada, 1988. 1875-1879.
137.INCO, Cyanide Destruction: The Inco 146.L. Moggi et al., Photochemistry of Co-
SO2/Air Process, Inco Exploration and ordination Compounds - XV. Cyanide
Technical Services, 1993. Complexes, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 28
(1966) 2589-2597.
138.C.J. Wernlund and M.J. Gunick, Dis-
posal of Waste Cyanide Solutions, 147.A.W. Adamson, A. Chiang and E. Zi-
U.S. Patent No., 2194438, 1940. nato, Photochemistry of Aqueous Co-
balt (III) Cyano Complexes, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 91 (1969) 5467-5475.
151.G.R. Heltz, R.G. Zepp and D.G. 159.H. Hidaka et al., Heterogeneous Pho-
Crosby, Aquatic and Surface Photo- tocatalytic Degradation of Cyanide on
chemistry, Lewis Publishers, Boca TiO2 Surfaces, J. Photochem. Photo-
Raton, LA, 1994. biol. A: Chem., 66 (1992) 367-374.
152.B.G. Oliver and J.H. Carey, Photode- 160.C.H. Pollema et al., Photocatalytic
gradation of Wastes and Pollutants in Oxidation of Cyanide to Nitrate at TiO2
Aquatic Environment, In: E. Pelizzetti Particles, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A:
and M. Schiavello (Eds.), Homogene- Chem., 66 (1992) 235-244.
ous and Heterogeneous Photocataly-
sis, 1986, pp. 629-650. 161.B.V. Mihaylov, J.L. Hendrix and J.H.
Nelson, Comparative Catalytic Activity
153.V.V. Goncharuk and A.O. Samsoni- of Selected Metal Oxides and Sulfides
Todorov, Photocatalytic Decomposition for the Photo-Oxidation of Cyanide, J.
of Hydrogen Peroxide in Aqueous So- Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem., 72
lutions in the Presence of Ferrocya- (1993) 173-177.
nides, Khim. Tek. Vody, 8 (1986) 34-
38. 162.E.M. Froelich, Advanced Chemical
Oxidation of Contaminated Water Us-
154.S.A. Frank and A.J. Bard, Heteroge- ing the Perox-pure™ Oxidation Sys-
neous Photocatalytic Oxidation of tem, presented at Chemical Oxidation:
Cyanide and Sulfite in Aqueous Solu- Technology for the 1990's, Vanderbilt
tions at Semiconductor Powders, J. Univ., February 20-22, 1991.
Phys. Chem., 81 (1977) 1484-1488.
163.Solarchem, Destruction of Cyanide,
155.B.C. Weathington, Project Summary. The UV/Oxidation Handbook, So-
Destruction of Cyanide in Waste Wa- larchem Environmental Systems, On-
ters: Review and Evaluation, U.S. EPA tario, Canada, 1995.
Report No. EPA/600/2-88/031, Water
Engineering Research Laboratory, 164.U.S. EPA, Superfund Innovative Tech-
Cincinnati, OH, 1988. nology Evaluation Program: Technol-
ogy Profiles, 5th ed., EPA/540/R-
92/077, 1992.