Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JNewModelforShariah CompliantPortfolio
JNewModelforShariah CompliantPortfolio
Abstract. In this paper, a new fuzzy model is presented to improve methods for
Shariah-compliant portfolio optimization, and provides an overview of faith-
compliant portfolio optimization. The spread of fuzzy variable is adopted as
criteria in practical risk management in Islamic finance. First, the effect of
shariah-compliant strategy to portfolio optimization is covered in the literature
review. After analyzing the literature, it was identified that the previous models
lack the fuzzy environment so that they were unable to deal with uncertainty.
Consequently, a new model is proposed to apply the fuzzy environment to
Shariah-compliance portfolio optimization. In this research activity, an E-S
model by the linear combination of the risk and reward for fuzzy shariah-
compliant is proposed. Finally, some future works are presented along with a
conclusion.
*
Corresponding author.
A. Abd Manaf et al. (Eds.): ICIEIS 2011, Part III, CCIS 253, pp. 210–217, 2011.
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011
New Model for Shariah-Compliant Portfolio Optimization under Fuzzy Environment 211
2 Fundamental Concepts
In this section, we present some basic primary senses for entrance the discussion:
2.1 Shariah-Compliant
Islamic finance is controlled by the Shariah, which prohibits speculation, but covenant
that income must be derivative as profits from shared business risk rather than interest
or guaranteed return[16]. Quran, Hadith and Ijtihad are the main Shariah sources for
these rules. The Quran is the principal source of Islam, including the terminology of
God as delivered to the prophet Mohammed while the Hadith consists of story
minutes of the events and sayings of the prophet himself. Ijtihad is the third Shariah
source, that the origin and formulation of Shariah laws by practiced scholars.
While there is no higher institution liable for religious faiths to be followed by all
Muslims, Shariah scholars [17] take these sources and specify so called Shariah-
compliance strategies to be followed within asset selection[18-20]. Despite these
religious limitations and legal uncertainty encompassing the ability of investor
interest under Islamic fiqh, Islamic finance can make balanced to equity, mortgages,
and derivatives known in conservative finance[16].
presumptuous that the investors’ wish to strike a balance between maximizing the
return and minimizing the risk of their investment [21].
Portfolio problem: Let , ,..., be stochastic return rates of assets 1,2, . . . , .
We suppose that | | ∞ for all 1, . . . , . Our plan is to invest our capital in
these assets in order to get some attractive characteristics of the total return rate on the
investment. Denoting by , , . . . , the fractions of the original capital invested in
assets 1,2, . . . , we can quickly gain the formula for the whole return rate:
(1)
Obviously, the set of feasible asset allocations can be determined as follows:
: ... 1, 0, 1, . . . , (2)
∑
(3)
Sector rules have to be satisfied on the single assets or the total portfolio, whereas
compliance is measured as an element of them.
New Model for Shariah-Compliant Portfolio Optimization under Fuzzy Environment 213
0 If (5)
Unequal of (5) can be turned into a set of mathematical inequality like follows: We
describe a binary variable for each asset, has been following form:
1 if is complaint
(6)
0 otherwise
. (8)
0 only if 1 (9)
According to constraints (8) guarantee, that is 0 if the guideline (6) is not fulfilled.
A portfolio complies with a specific rule if the sum of the ratio values over all
assets, weighted by their share values is less than the threshold, i.e.
∑ . (10)
A portfolio is acquiescent with related to a strategy if fulfils all
guidelines . So, for a central strategy and the set of rules we find the
following portfolio optimization model:
214 Y. Elahi and M.I. Abd Aziz
Min
Subject to (2)-(4) and
∑ . (11)
The portfolio-based fulfillment strategies can now be modeled as follows:
Strategy 1: Best of Shariah strategy. In this strategy, we must solve the model for
each alone. In addition, the optimal portfolio related to this strategy is the one
produced by the model yielding the best portfolio presentation.
Strategy 2: Consensus/Ijmaa Shariah strategy. To introduce Shariah-compliance
under the Ijmaa strategy, we have got to substitute (11) by:
∑ . , (12)
Strategy 3: Liberal strategy. We define the binary variables for model of the liberal
compliance strategy as the following:
There are nonlinear compulsions, and with attention to solvability of the optimization
model must be present as follows:
∑ . 1 . , , (13)
That is a being as much as needed great number. Now caused by (12) at least for
one ; , we attain
1 and we have at least one .
Strategy 4: Majority/Kasra strategy. We change in the model for the liberal strategy
for the majority strategy via
| |
∑ , (14)
Which certifies that at least the majority of main strategies regards as the
portfolio as being compliant [2].
∞, ∞
dΦ , (15)
Where is the expected value of fuzzy variable [28] and Φ is the credibility
distribution of the fuzzy variable [29]. Every financier has to decide on an appropriate
combine of assets to comprise in his investment portfolio. Specified a set of potential
investments indexed from 1 to , allow indicate the fuzzy return in the next time
period on investment , 1, . . . , . A portfolio is shown by specify what fraction of
one’s assets to situate into each investment. That is, a portfolio is a set of nonnegative
numbers , 1, . . . , that summation to one. The return the investor would
related achieve by using a given portfolio is introduced as∑ , which is also a
fuzzy variable, then the reward with such a portfolio is shown as the expected return
∑ .
Now, we will describe the risk coupled with an investment to be the spread of the
fuzzy return ∑ , that is the quadratic deviation from the expected value. In our
portfolio selection problem, we would like to minimize the risk and not incur too
small reward. So, we formally build the following E-S model by a linear arrangement
of the risk and the reward:
min ∑ ∑
. . ∑ 1 , (16)
0, 1,2, … ,
The positive parameter denotes the important relation between risk and reward [30].
1 if is complaint
0 otherwise
In a new model, with the above condition, we present the following E-S model by a
linear combination of the risk and the reward for fuzzy shariah-compliant:
min ∑ ∑
. . ∑ 1 , (17)
0, 1,2, … ,
where is a positive parameter. In the fuzzy environment, the positive parameter
denotes the relation between risk and reward.
5 Conclusion
Within this paper, we have attention to the problem of Shariah-compliant portfolio
construction. The analysis revealed that, fuzzy methodology allows us to add
216 Y. Elahi and M.I. Abd Aziz
uncertainty into data bases and also to combine personal characteristics into the
models. A financial asset comprises multi norm decision-making with the fuzzy
deterministic formulation [21]. Monetary novelty will help to more growth and
improve of Shariah-compliant derivative contracts. For example, extend of faith
derivatives fine for the Islamic insurance (taka ful) industry, limitation the possible of
risk diversification from a larger group of available assets [16].
In addition, the essential condition of such faith rules by the Shariah scholars the
accessibility of modeling tools for setting up the Shariah-compliant portfolio
optimization model is a main requirement, Although, not obligatory for trend the new
paradigm in practice[2].
As a consequence, This model decreases complexity of computation and could be a
fine replacement for Shariah-compliant portfolio optimization model, that present by
Ulrich, D., Marzban, S . With sustaining this system, this model will develop in the
future. Such as, Shariah-compliant Fuzzy risk and return optimization model and
Shariah-compliant Fuzzy pricing optimization model.
References
1. Wilson, R., Jaffer, S. (eds.): Screening criteria for islamic equity funds. In: Islamic Asset
Management: Forming the Future for Shariah-Compliant Investment Strategies, pp. 35–45.
Euromoney Books, London (2004)
2. Ulrich, D., Marzban, S.: A New strategies and a new paradigm for Shariah-compliant
portfolio optimization. Journal of Banking & Finance 33, 1166–1176 (2009)
3. Mosler, K., Scarsini, M. (eds.): Stochastic Orders and Decision Under Risk. Institute of
Mathematical Statistics, Hayward (1991)
4. Whitmore, G., Findlay, M. (eds.): Stochastic Dominance: An Approach to Decision-
Making Under Risk. D.C.Heath, Lexington (1978)
5. Fishburn, P.: Decision and Value Theory. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1964)
6. Hardy, G., Littlewood, J.E., Pólya, G.: Inequalities. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge (1934)
7. Marshall, A., Olkin, I.: Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications.
Academic Press, San Diego (1979)
8. Quirk, J., Saposnik, R.: Admissibility and measurable utility functions. Review of
Economic Studies 29, 140–146 (1962)
9. Hadar, J., Russell, W.: Rules for ordering uncertain prospects. American Economic
Review 59, 25–34 (1969)
10. Rothschild, M., Stiglitz, J.E.: Increasing risk: I. A definition. Journal of Economic
Theory 2, 225–243 (1969)
11. Markowitz, H.: Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance 7, 77–91 (1952)
12. Konno, H., Yamazaki, H.: Mean–absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its
applications to the Tokyo Stock Market. Management Science 37, 519–531 (1991)
13. Mansini, R., Speranza, M.: Heuristic algorithms for the portfolio selection problem with
minimum transaction lots. European Journal of Operational Research 114, 219–233 (1999)
New Model for Shariah-Compliant Portfolio Optimization under Fuzzy Environment 217
14. Wu, H.: The Karush–Kuhn–Tucker optimality conditions for the optimization problem
with fuzzy-valued objective function. Mathematical Method of Operation Research 66,
203–224 (2007)
15. Zhang, X., Wei-Guo, Z., Wei-Jun, X.: An optimization model of the portfolio adjusting
problem with fuzzy return and a SMO algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications 38,
3069–3074 (2011)
16. Jobst, A.: Derivatives in Islamic Finance. In: International Conference on Islamic Capital
Markets, Jakarta, Indonesia during, August 27-29 (2007)
17. Delorenzo, Y.: Shariah Supervision of Islamic Mutual Funds. In: Proceedings of the
Fourth Harvard University Forum on Islamic Finance. Harvard University, Cambridge
(2000)
18. Derigs, U., Marzban, S.: Review and analysis of current Shariah-compliant equity
screening practices. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and
Management 1(4), 285–303 (2008)
19. Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., Zhang, C.: Socially responsible investments: Institutional
aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of Banking and Finance 32, 1723–
1742 (2008)
20. Galema, R., Plantinga, A., Scholtens, B.: The stocks at stake: Return and risk in socially
responsible investment. Journal of Banking and Finance 32, 2646–2654 (2008)
21. Pankaj, G., Mukesh, K., Anand, S.: Asset portfolio optimization using fuzzy mathematical
programming. Journal of Information Sciences 178, 1734–1755 (2008)
22. Darinka, D., Andrzej, R.: Portfolio optimization with stochastic dominance constraints.
Journal of Banking & Finance 30, 433–451 (2006)
23. Ha-Young, K., Frederi, G.: Viens Portfolio optimization in discrete time with proportional
transaction costs under stochastic volatility. onlin springer (2010)
24. Feisal, K.: How ‘Islamic’ is Islamic Banking? Journal of Economic Behavior &
Organization 76, 805–820 (2010)
25. Iqbal, M., Ahmad, A., Khan.: Challenges facing Islamic banking. Islamic Development
Bank. Islamic Research and Training Institute Occasional Paper (1998)
26. Dentcheva, D., Ruszczynski, A.: Portfolio optimization with stochastic dominance control.
Journal of Banking and Finance 30, 433–451 (2006)
27. Corielli, F., Marcellino, M.: Factor based index tracking. Journal of Banking and
Finance 30, 2215–2233 (2008)
28. Liu, B., Liu, Y.: Expected Value of Fuzzy Variable and Fuzzy Expected Value Models.
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 10, 445–450 (2002)
29. Liu, B.: Uncertainty Theory. Springer, Berlin (2004)
30. Liu, Y., Wu, X.: A Class of Fuzzy Portfolio Optimization Problems: E-S models. In: Tan,
Y., Shi, Y., Tan, K.C. (eds.) ICSI 2010. LNCS, vol. 6146, pp. 43–50. Springer, Heidelberg
(2010)
31. José, V., Enriqueta, V., Bermúdeza, J.D.: Fuzzy portfolio optimization under downside
risk measures. Centro de Investigación Operativa, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche
(2005)