Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/233162245
CITATIONS READS
24 4,390
4 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Production of biogas from co-digestion of paper waste and manure View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Siddharth Chatterjee on 27 May 2014.
ABSTRACT
Evaporative cooling of water in a small porous clay vessel was studied under
temperature of 23 °C, the cooling effect increased from 4.7 to 8.3 °C as the ambient
relative humidity decreased from 60 to 15%. External heat and mass transfer coefficients,
predict the experimentally observed transient temperature variation of the water under
ramp changes of the ambient relative humidity. With a prototypical cool chamber
containing water tested in Kolkata, India under an ambient temperature of 34.5–35 °C,
the cooling effect reached a maximum of 7 °C between 3 and 3:30 PM and then declined
Keywords: Evaporative cooling; Heat transfer; Mass transfer; Porous media; Cool
chamber
1
Presently at Portellus, Inc., 2010 Main St., Suite 450, Irvine, CA 92614, U.S.A.
2
Correspondence: S. G. Chatterjee, Faculty of Paper Science and Engineering, SUNY College of
Environmental Science and Forestry, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, U.S.A., E-mail:
schatterjee@esf.edu
1
INTRODUCTION
Evaporative cooling, a technique that has been in use for several centuries in the
Middle East and Africa, is a passive cooling process in which a body or an object is
cooled by the evaporation of water from its surface. Since only ambient energy is utilized
for the evaporation, evaporative cooling is a very promising method that can be used in
the design of storage facilities for perishable food products like fruits and vegetables and
for air conditioning in rural areas of developing countries, especially when the local
weather conditions are hot and dry. This cooling technique should be especially relevant
at present when depleting fossil fuel reserves and environmental problems caused by the
rapid use of such fuels are of mounting global concern. Since evaporative cooling has
diverse applications, we present a brief review of some of the recent literature in this
area.
ceramic pot to be 10.4–15 °C below the ambient temperature and to have a smaller daily
variation than the external temperature. Taha et al. (1994) observed a temperature
of zinc whose outer surface was covered by continuously wetted charcoal layers. Fruits
and vegetables like pomegranates, bananas, mangoes, tomatoes, and potatoes not only
had significantly increased shelf lives (by a factor of 1.2–2.7) but also exhibited good
under ambient conditions (Waskar et al., 1999; Dzivama et al., 1999; Kumar et al., 1999;
Uppal, 1999; Thakur et al., 2002; Dhemre and Waskar, 2003; Mordi and Olorunda,
2003). Anyanwu (2004) measured the transient response of an ECC to changes in the
2
ambient relative humidity (RH) and temperature during dry and wet seasons. The box
shaped ECC had two clay walls with continuously wetted coconut fibre filling the gap
between the walls. On average, the temperature inside the ECC was 1–8.2 °C and 3–12
°C lower than the ambient value during the wet and dry seasons, respectively. The ECC
also increased the shelf lives of tomatoes and pumpkins by factors of 2.9 and 5 above
their open-air storage values. Dash and Chandra (2001) developed a mathematical model
environment of an ECC, which was mainly affected by the rate of evaporation on the
outer surfaces of the ECC and the infiltration/exfiltration rates through the chamber.
Upchurch and Mahan (1988) found the characteristic leaf temperature of well-
watered cotton plants to be 27 ± 2 °C as the ambient air temperature varied from 27–40
evaporative cooling by transpiring leaf surfaces and active water use by the plant through
which it is able to control its temperature variation. According to Prange (1996), insects
subjected to a severe thermal radiative heat flux decreased due to the presence of an
evaporating water film on the structure’s surface. Kassem (1994) studied theoretically
and experimentally a farm structure in which air, humidified and cooled via passing
3
through a vertically oriented wetted pad, entered at one end of the building and exited
from the opposite end. His calculations revealed that increasing the water evaporation
efficiency of the pad and regulating the air and water intake rates to follow the diurnal
variation of the ambient temperature would lead to substantial savings in the energy and
water consumptions. Giabaklou and Ballinger (1996) and Ghiabaklou (2003) proposed a
system that used the evaporative cooling effect of water falling vertically along filaments
or guides to cool and humidify the air entering a building. For hot and semi-arid regions
like Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia, and Teheran, Iran, their model
predicted indoor average maximum temperatures to be 9.9 °C and 11.7 °C lower than the
temperature of the incoming ambient air, respectively. Their simulation model also
indicated that the evaporative cooling system would result in a more stable indoor
temperature and thermal comfort level as estimated from the predicted mean vote. In an
al. (2003) measured dry bulb temperature drops of 6–8 °C with a 30% increase in the RH
of the inlet air. The cooling effect was enhanced by a high porosity of the evaporator,
increased water supply pressure, and a single (as compared with a twin) row of
evaporators in the air duct. Hollow fibre membrane contactors, which have a large mass
transfer area per unit volume, with water and air flowing inside and outside the
microporus tubes, respectively, also have a good potential for space air conditioning and
have been investigated by Bergero and Chiari (2001) and Johnson et al. (2003). Dai and
Sumathy (2002) have presented a theoretical model in which wet honeycomb paper is
used as the packing material through which the air stream to be cooled and humidified
flows in a cross-flow fashion. Tang and Etzion (2004) and Cheikh and Bouchair (2004)
4
have developed dynamic models for predicting the thermal performance of roof ponds of
special designs for cooling buildings in hot and arid climates. From experimentation with
a variety of test structures, Nahar et al. (1999) recommended a roof with a shallow pond
Zalewski and Gryglaszewski (1997) developed a heat and mass transfer model for
evaporative fluid coolers in which water was sprayed over the surface of the tubes while
air flowed outside the tubes in a countercurrent fashion. A correction to the mass transfer
coefficient (initially calculated from the Lewis relation) was introduced which made
model predictions for the thermal performance of the cooler agree quite closely with
and Mitrovic (1998) developed correlations for the Nusselt number and temperature
decrease (due to evaporative cooling) for water falling freely from a horizontal tube to the
next one below it. They observed that the major part of the cooling effect occurred during
the free fall of the water between adjacent tubes rather than when it flowed as a film
around the tube. From a theoretical analysis of the evaporation of water flowing in a thin
film around the fin of an air-cooled heat exchanger, Song et al. (2003) concluded that
chilling time, an important consideration in the food industry, for a regular-shaped food
(infinite slab, infinite cylinder and sphere), which cools by convection and evaporation at
its surface. Their model agreed fairly well with experimental measurements of the
chilling time of a food analogue (Chuntranuluck et al., 1998b) and (peeled and unpeeled)
carrots (Chuntranuluck et al., 1998c). A more elegant model, which describes the cooling
5
of a high-moisture cylindrically shaped food via convection and evaporation at its
surface, has recently been proposed by van der Sman (2003). This model was based on
numerical calculations with the heat diffusion equation inside the food body, which
showed that except for a short initial time period, the average temperature remained in a
fixed location. However, van der Sman did not present any comparison of the predictions
In the present study, the following tasks are accomplished: (1) We test van der
in a small porous clay pot kept inside a controlled humidity chamber whose RH was
changed from one prescribed level to another in a ramped fashion. The mass and heat
transfer coefficients outside the vessel, which are required in the model, were estimated
from steady-state experiments. (2) We also develop a very simple mathematical model
evaporation at its surface under a dynamically changing ambient RH. Unlike the model of
van der Sman, this model requires the ratio of the mass and heat transfer coefficients and
indicate the usefulness of the models for the rational design of evaporatively cooled
chambers and hollow fiber membrane or porous ceramic units for room air conditioning.
Finally, we present some results of the evaporative cooling effect obtained with a
6
VAN DER SMAN’S MODEL
The chief assumptions in van der Sman’s model (van der Sman, 2003) which
describes the cooling of a regular-shaped body are: (1) heat transport inside the body
occurs only by conduction along the radial direction x (defined as the direction outwardly
normal from the axis of symmetry of the body), (2) the body is water logged with
evaporation occurring at its outer surface, and (3) thermal properties of the body are
dTavg
ρ eff c p ,eff V = −φ ext (1)
dt
where
∂T
φext = − keff Aext = hext Aext (Ts − Tamb ) + λ (Ts ) k f ,ext Aext (cs (Ts ) − camb ) (2)
∂x x=ap
Note that in Eq. (2) it has been assumed that the outer surface of the body is completely
wet, i.e., water activity is unity. The assumption of a porous medium completely
saturated with water significantly simplifies the theoretical treatment of the evaporative
cooling process. (A model for moisture evaporation and migration in a thin unsaturated
porous packed bed has been presented by Liu et al., 1997.) From the ideal gas law, it can
be shown that
7
k eff
hint = (5)
dc
Here, dc is a characteristic length that depends on the geometry of the body (slab, cylinder
or sphere) and is given in Table 1 as a function of the half thickness or radius of the body,
ap. From Eqs. (2) and (4) we can derive the relation between the average and surface
hext λ (T )k
Tavg = Ts + (Ts − Tamb ) + s f ,ext (c s (Ts ) − camb ) (6)
hint hint
and, therefore,
dλ (Ts )
(cs (Ts ) − camb ) + λ (Ts ) dc s (Ts )
dTavg hext k f ,ext
= f (Ts ) = 1 + + (7)
dTs hint hint dTs dTs
From Eqs. (1) and (2) it may be easily shown that the variation of the surface temperature
dTs g (Ts )
= (8)
dt f (Ts )
where
g (Ts ) =
Aext
[
ρ eff c p ,eff V
]
hext (Tamb − Ts ) − λ (Ts )k f ,ext (c s (Ts ) − c amb ) (9)
For moderate temperature ranges, the vapor pressure of water Psat and the latent heat of
λ (T ) = c3 + c 4T (11)
8
where c1–c4 are constants. In this case, the functions f and g are given by
c T
hext k f , ext M wc1e 2 amb ec 2Ts Tamb RH amb (c3 + c4Ts )Tamb ec 2Ts c2Ts − 1
f (Ts ) = 1 + + c4 c 2Tamb − +
hint hint RgasTamb e Ts 100 e c 2Tamb Ts
2
(12)
Note that the ambient temperature Tamb and relative humidity RHamb as well as the
external heat and mass transfer coefficients hext and kf,ext can be arbitrary functions of
time t.
Utilizing Eqs. (2), (4) and (5), Eq. (1) can be recast as
= hi (Ts − Tavg )
dTavg
(15)
dt
keff Aext A
hi = = α eff ext (16)
ρ c
eff p ,eff Vd c Vd c
Equation (15) is the well-known linear driving force (LDF) approximation that represents
the heat transfer process inside the body. The LDF concept has been used previously to
to as the Glueckauf approximation (Tien, 1994). Note that the characteristic length dc in
the Glueckauf approximation is different from that in van der Sman’s model; expressions
for dc for both approximations are given in Table 1 for different geometries (slab,
cylinder and sphere). The Glueckauf approximations for the slab and cylinder can be
9
derived by assuming a quadratic temperature profile inside the body and minimizing the
weighted square of the residual similar to the method presented by Tien (1994) for the
case of a sphere. This mathematical procedure, however, does not lead to any insight into
the physical nature of the LDF approximation unlike the explanation provided by van der
Sman (2003).
Under steady-state or equilibrium conditions, Tavg = Ts = Teq, and Eq. (6) becomes
λ (Teq ) k f ,ext
Tamb − Teq =
hext
(c (T ) − c )
s eq amb (17)
where Teq is the wet-bulb temperature (Treybal, 1980). The mass transfer coefficient kf,ext
is related to the steady-state weight loss rate of the body Wloss (due to water evaporation)
by
Once kf,ext has been determined from Eq. (18), the heat transfer coefficient hext can be
obtained from Eq. (17), provided values of Tamb, Teq and RHamb are known.
A photograph and schematic diagram of the small pot, made of highly porous red
clay, which was used in the controlled humidity experiments, are shown in Fig. 1. The
pot, which had cylindrical symmetry, consisted of an upper cylindrical portion and a
lower frustum. The area of its external surface (excluding the top and the base) can be
calculated from
The clay pot was conceptually modeled as a regular cylinder having an equivalent radius
given by
10
Aext
Requiv = (20)
2π (lcyl + h f )
For a cylinder, the characteristic length dc, which is related to the internal heat transfer
coefficient hint by Eq. (5), is equal to Requiv/3 in the van der Sman model (Table 1). If we
neglect the effect of curvature, which will be valid for a thin wall (for the clay pot used in
our experiments, twall/Requiv = 0.14), the effective thermal conductivity keff for use in Eq.
Requiv
keff = (21)
t wall Rwater
+
kclay k water
where
For the clay pot containing water used in our work, the dominant resistance to internal
heat transport was offered by the water, hence, the value of keff was close to that of kwater.
The quantity ρ eff c p ,eff V in Eq. (1) for our system of the clay pot containing water
can be expressed as
Although the mass of water in the pot mwater changed continuously during an experiment
in which the ambient relative humidity RHamb was varied in a transient fashion, in our
calculations we have used an average value of mwater since the amounts of water
evaporated were only 4.9 and 6.5% in the two dynamic experimental runs reported in this
paper.
11
In our work in which Tamb was kept constant, we found from steady-state
experiments that the heat and mass transfer coefficients could be adequately represented
by the expressions
k f ,ext
= c7 RH amb + c8 (25)
hext
where c5–c8 are constants. In the dynamic experiments, the ambient relative humidity
RHamb was varied linearly from an initial equilibrium level of RHi at time t = 0 down to a
final value of RHf at a rate r. The time tr of the duration of the ramp is then given by
RH i − RH f
tr = (26)
r
For t > tr, RHamb was maintained at a level equal to RHf. Therefore, RHamb can be
described by
RH i − RH f
RH amb (t ) = RH i − t for 0 ≤ t ≤ tr (27a)
tr
Equation (8), subject to the initial condition expressed by Eq. (14), can be
function of time t after which the average temperature of the body Tavg may be calculated
thermocouple, located approximately midway between the top and bottom of the clay pot
along its central axis of symmetry, was used to measure the water temperature, Tcntr.
12
Thus, we need a relation between the average temperature of the water Tavg, predicted
from van der Sman’s model described above, and Tcntr. Let us assume a power-law
Tw ( x, t ) = a (t ) + b (t ) x n (28)
where a and b are functions of time and n (≥ 1) is a constant. Noting that for a cylinder
ap
2
Tavg (t ) = 2 ∫ T ( x, t ) xdx
w (29)
ap 0
2 (Tavg − Ts )
Tcntr = Tavg + (30)
n
where Tcntr and Ts are the values of Tw at x = 0 (central axis of cylinder) and at x = ap
It can be readily observed from Eqs. (4), (5), (31), and Table 1 that van der
does not satisfy the zero gradient condition of ∂Tw/∂x = 0 at x = 0, a value of n arbitrarily
close to 1 does satisfy this condition as can be seen from Eq. (28). Therefore, Eq. (30)
with a value of n = 1 was used to calculate the central temperature from the average and
surface temperatures, which were obtained from van der Sman’s model.
13
SIMPLE MODEL
the use of van der Sman’s model outlined above, we present a very simple model that
describes the variation of the average temperature of a body undergoing convective and
evaporative cooling at its surface under a dynamically varying ambient RH. Combining
= − β (Tavg − Ts )
dTavg
(32)
dt
hint Aext
β= (33)
ρ eff c p ,eff V
We now assume that the surface of the body is in a state of quasi or pseudo
equilibrium with its surroundings so that its surface temperature can be calculated from
Eq. (17), i.e., Ts = Teq. This assumption, which actually contradicts the condition of
nonequilibrium at the body’s surface as expressed by Eq. (2), is similar to the assumption
etc). Any error resulting from this assumption can be absorbed into hint, which can be
and Tamb, which, in principal, may be arbitrary functions of time t. To use Eq. (17) in our
simple model, the inverse psychrometric ratio kf,ext/hext should be known unlike in van der
Sman’s model, which requires individual values of kf,ext and hext (which were measured in
this work). As mentioned earlier, kf,ext/hext can be estimated by measuring the steady-state
wet bulb temperature of the body under given ambient conditions while kf,ext, assuming an
14
empirical correlation is not available, has to be estimated by measuring the rate of weight
loss of the body due to evaporation, which is a much more difficult proposition for a
large object. Alternatively, the Lewis relation may be employed to estimate kf,ext/hext or
the air-water vapor psychrometric chart can be utilized to obtain Teq as a function of
RHamb and Tamb. In our work, the steady-state and dynamic experiments were conducted
in a room with a controlled climate (humidity and temperature) in which Tamb was kept
constant (22–23 °C). We found from the steady-state measurements that over a moderate
temperature range (14.7–18.7 °C in this work), the relation between Teq and RHamb could
be well described by
where c9 and c10 are constants. Substituting Eqs. (27a) and (27b) into Eq. (34), we can
where
c9 ( RH i − RH f )
c11 = − (36)
tr
and Teq,f is the (equilibrium) wet-bulb temperature corresponding to RHf [which can be
Using Eqs. (35a) and (35b), the solution of Eq. (32), subject to the initial
15
c
Tavg = c11t + c12 − 11 (1 − e− β t ) + Tini e− β t for 0 ≤ t ≤ tr (38a)
β
( )
= Teq , f + Tavg ,tr − Teq , f e − β (t −tr ) for t > tr (38b)
where Tavg ,tr is the average temperature of the body at t = tr calculated by Eq. (38a).
Unlike in the case of van der Sman’s model, in the simple model it is not possible
to derive an expression relating Tcntr and Tavg due to the arbitrary assumption of
equilibrium at the body’s surface. Therefore, we postulate that the variation of Tcntr with
time has the same form as that expressed by Eqs. (38a) and (38b) in which hint [see Eq.
(33)] is considered to be an empirical factor that can be obtained by fitting the theoretical
Tcntr to its experimentally observed value. As justification for this assumption we note
that in the cooling of water contained in a flattened ellipsoidal ceramic porous pot,
Aimiuwu (1992) found the cooling curve to be well fitted by an expression of the type
given by Eq. (38b), and, as will be presented later, Eqs. (38a) and (38b) represent fairly
well the empirically observed transient behavior of Tcntr in the evaporative cooling of
water in the clay pot used in our experiments for ramp changes of the ambient RH.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
diagram is shown in Fig. 2) in which the steady-state and dynamic evaporative cooling
experiments were conducted (in Syracuse, New York) has been provided previously by
Chatterjee et al.(1997). As mentioned earlier, all experiments reported in this work were
performed at an ambient (i.e., humidity chamber) temperature Tamb of 22–23 °C. Inside
the humidity chamber, the clay pot (obtained from Syracuse Pottery, 6551 Pottery Road,
Warners, NY 13164-9756), almost filled with water, was placed on a piece of styrofoam
16
that was set on a pan suspended from a Mettler 200PM balance (accuracy: 1 mg), which
was connected to a computer. The top of the pot was sealed with a styrofoam lid and air
of a definite humidity, obtained by mixing wet and dry air in specific proportions,
continuously flowed around the pot. A Vaisala humidity sensor (accuracy: 1% RH)
monitored the chamber RH and temperature and sent its signal to the computer that
maintained the RH in the chamber at a prescribed level by controlling the wet and dry
airflows. A factory-calibrated thermocouple was inserted into the pot through the lid at its
center in order to measure the temperature Tcntr of the water inside. The thermocouple,
whose calibration was also tested in house, had an accuracy of 0.1 °C. The weight (loss)
of the cup and the RH of the chamber were monitored as a function of time by a
to obtain kf,ext and hext as a function of the chamber RH (i.e., RHamb), were conducted at
levels of 60, 45, 30, and 15% RH, respectively (see Table 4). At a prescribed value of
RHamb, the clay pot containing water was allowed to attain a state of equilibrium (i.e., no
temperature gradient in the water) with the ambient. This generally took 40-60 min and
equilibrium was assumed to be established when Tcntr attained a steady value (equal to
Teq). The slope of the steady-state (i.e., linear) part of the weight-loss curve was used to
estimate Wloss. Two experimental replicates were used at the prescribed level of RHamb
and average values of Wloss, Teq and Tamb of the two replicates were used to calculate the
ratio kf,ext/hext and kf,ext from Eqs. (17) and (18), respectively. With kf,ext and kf,ext/hext
17
In the dynamic evaporative cooling experiments, the clay pot containing water
(suspended from the balance) was subjected to RH ramps inside the controlled humidity
chamber. Before the ramp was begun, RHamb was maintained at a value of RHi and the
pot was allowed to attain equilibrium. Thereafter, RHamb was decreased at a constant rate
(0.5 and 1% RH/min) until a final desired RH value, RHf, was attained in the chamber.
This final RH level was maintained for some more time so that the pot essentially
attained equilibrium. From the start of the RH ramp until the end of the experiment, the
temperature of the water in the pot Tcntr was recorded manually at periodic intervals
(generally every 5, 10 or 15 min). An average of the mass of water contained in the pot at
the beginning and at the end of the experiment was used as the value of mwater in Eq. (23).
prototype of an ECC, shown in Fig. 3, was tested in Kolkata, India. This cool chamber
consisted of a copper vessel (containing water) wrapped in a piece of wet cloth that was
placed between two small fans. Periodically, a thermometer (accuracy: 0.1 °C) was used
to measure the temperature of the water Twater near the top and center of the vessel while
an analog Hucer hygrometer (accuracy: 1% RH) measured the ambient humidity in the
Table 2 lists the various physical properties and relations while Table 3 reports
Table 4 and Figs. 4-6 exhibit results of the steady-state evaporative cooling
consider the data reported in Table 4. The maximum differences in RHamb, Tamb and Teq
18
between the two replicates are 0.1% RH, 0.3 °C and 0.3 °C, respectively. The maximum
deviations of Wloss from its average values are 4.1% and 4.5% for the first and second
replicates, respectively. On average, the steady-state weight loss rate increased by about
19% as RHamb was reduced from 60 to 30%; it then decreased slightly with a further
reduction of RHamb to 15%. The following speculation can be advanced for this behavior:
As RHamb was reduced from 60%, the driving force for mass transfer (cs – camb) increased
while the mass transfer coefficient (kf,ext) decreased [see Eq. (18) and Fig. 5] as a result of
the changed air flow inside the humidity chamber. However, the increase in the former
more than compensated for a decrease in the latter, with a consequent increase in Wloss.
As RHamb was decreased below a certain level, the reduction in kf,ext and a possible
exponential function of Ts) was responsible for the observed decrease in Wloss.
and the linear correlation given by Eq. (25). At the four experimental values of RHamb of
15, 30, 45, and 60%, the quantity ρair,amb kf,ext/hext takes values of 0.40, 0.45, 0.59, and
0.64 g K/J, respectively, which can be compared to the value of 1 g K/J given by the
Lewis relation for the air–water vapor system. Here, ρair,amb is the ambient air density
calculated by
ρ air ,amb =
(P
amb − P sat (Tamb )) M air
(39)
RgasTamb
Figure 5 shows that the experimental kf,ext decreased from 1.06 to 0.44 to cm/s as
the steady-state RHamb was reduced from 60 to 15% (due to different air flow conditions
in the humidity chamber) and that the linear correlation given by Eq. (24) is a fairly good
19
representation of the experimental data. The variation of the experimental steady-state
equilibrium temperature of the clay pot Teq is plotted in Fig. 6 as a function of the steady-
state RHamb along with the correlation given by Eq. (34). The experimental value of the
temperature drop ∆T = Tamb – Teq, which represents the cooling effect due to evaporation,
increased in the sequence 4.7, 6.3, 7.1, and 8.3 °C as RHamb was reduced from 60 to15%
in steps of 15% RH (Table 4). Thus, in contrast to the moderate effect of RHamb on Wloss
mentioned earlier, ∆T increased by about 77% as RHamb was lowered from 60 to 15%.
which RHamb was changed from 60 to 15% linearly with time. The values of the ramp
rates and average ambient temperature Tamb in the two experimental runs shown in Figs. 7
and 8 were 0.5 and 1% RH/min and 22.3 and 22.2 °C, respectively. We note that no
fitting parameter was employed in the van der Sman model in order to match theoretical
predictions of the transient Tcntr with its experimental values. However, in the simple
model, a value of hint = 1.817 × 10-3 W/(cm2 K) was used to match theory with
experiment. Overall, both models capture the trend of the experimental variation of Tcntr
with time reasonably well, however, there is an over prediction of 1.4 and 1.2 °C by the
van der Sman model at the beginning of the RH ramp in Figs. 7 and 8, respectively.
Perhaps a more complex model, which divides the body undergoing evaporative cooling
into a shell and a core (van der Sman, 2003), would have reduced the initial discrepancy.
The average absolute errors between prediction and measurement in Figs. 7 and 8 are 0.3
°C and 0.1–0.3 °C for the van der Sman and simple models, respectively.
ECC (Fig. 3) can be observed from the data presented in Table 5. The data, which were
20
taken in Kolkata, India on the afternoon of May 13, 2004 when the ambient temperature
in the room was 34.5–35 °C, show that as the afternoon progressed, the cooling effect
(Tamb – Twater) reached a maximum of 7 °C between 3 and 3:30 PM (mid afternoon, RHamb
= 63%) and subsequently declined to 4.5 °C around 6 PM (evening, RHamb = 88%). The
cooling effect would probably have been larger if the experiment had been conducted
outdoors. The cooling effect of 7 °C at RHamb = 63% observed under tropical conditions
(Tamb = 35 °C) can be compared to the one of 4.7 °C at RHamb = 60% observed under
the evaporative cooling of water contained in a small porous clay vessel kept inside a
varied linearly with time from one prescribed level to another. In the steady-state
experiments as the RH of the chamber, whose temperature was 23 °C, was decreased
from 60 to 15%, the cooling effect due to evaporation, represented by the difference
between the ambient temperature and the temperature of the water in the clay pot,
increased from 4.7 to 8.3 °C, which shows the critical influence of the ambient RH on the
temperature depression. The steady-state data were used to estimate the heat and mass
mathematical model recently proposed in the literature (van der Sman, 2003) to predict
the transient temperature variation of the water in the vessel as the ambient RH was
reduced from 60 to 15% in a linear fashion with time. A very simple mathematical model
21
convection and evaporation at its surface under a dynamically changing ambient RH. In
contrast to the model of van der Sman, this model requires the ratio of the mass and heat
transfer coefficients, contains an empirical fitting parameter (hint) but has a closed form
solution. Except for an initial discrepancy in van der Sman’s model, on average, both
dynamic models gave predictions that were in fair agreement with experiment.
Evaporative cooling under tropical conditions was investigated with a prototypical ECC
in Kolkata, India. During an afternoon of May 2004 when the ambient temperature was
34.5–35 °C, the cooling effect reached a maximum of 7 °C between 3 and 3:30 PM and
This work confirms previous findings in the literature that a cooling effect of
several degrees Celsius can be realized through evaporative cooling and this effect will
be enhanced in a drier environment. It is hoped that the two models of the evaporative
cooling process examined in this work will be useful for the rational design of
evaporatively cooled chambers and hollow fibre membrane or porous ceramic units for
room air conditioning and for estimating the cooling time of food products.
NOMENCLATURE
22
cp,water Heat capacity of water [J/(g K)]
c11, c12 Constants defined by Eqs. (36) and (37), respectively (s-1, K or °C)
hint Internal heat transfer coefficient defined by Eq. (5) [W/(cm2 K)]
23
Mw Molecular weight of water (18.016 g/gmol)
rbot, rtop Bottom and top radii of frustum of clay pot, respectively (cm)
RHi, RHf Initial and final relative humidities at the beginning and the end of the RH
t Time (s)
T Temperature (K)
24
Ts Surface temperature of body (K)
Twater Temperature of water near the top and center of the prototypical ECC (°C)
Wloss Weight-loss rate of body due to evaporation under steady-state conditions (g/s or
g/h)
REFERENCES
for preservation of fruits and vegetables. Energy Conversion and Management 45:
2187-2195.
25
Armbruster, R. and J. Mitrovic. 1998. Evaporative cooling of a falling water film on
Cheikh, H. B. and A. Bouchair. 2004. Passive cooling by evapo-reflective roof for hot
22: 1417-1430.
26
Dash, S. K. and P. Chandra. 2001. Effects of different structural and operational
30(3): 51-55.
Fu, W-S., J-D. Lin, K-C. Tu, and C-C. Tseng.1990. Numerical study of a structure
Ghiabaklou, Z. 2003. Thermal comfort prediction for a new passive cooling system.
Ibrahim, E., L. Shao and S. B. Riffat. 2003. Performance of porous ceramic evaporators
Johnson, D. W., C. Yavuzturk and J. Pruis. 2003. Analysis of heat and mass transfer
27
Kassem, A-W. S. 1994. Energy and water management in evaporative cooling systems in
effect of HDPE film wrapping. Journal of Food Science and Technology 36(5):
438-440.
Liu, W., S. W. Peng and K. Mizukami. 1997. Moisture evaporation and migration in thin
visual qualities and storage life of fresh tomatoes. Journal of Food Science and
Nahar, N. M., P. Sharma and M. M. Purohit. 1999. Studies on solar passive cooling
techniques for arid areas. Energy Conversion & Management 40: 89-95.
Perry, R. H., D. W. Green and J. O. Maloney, Eds. 1984. Perry’s Chemical Engineers’
Song, C. H., D-Y. Lee and S. T. Ro. 2003. Cooling enhancement in an air-cooled finned
heat exchanger by thin water film evaporation. International Journal of Heat and
porous material to be used for reservation of food. Renewable Energy 5(1): 474-
476.
28
Tang, R. and Y. Etzion. 2004. On thermal performance of an improved roof pond for
Thakur, K. S., B. B. Lal Kaushal and R. M. Sharma. 2002. Effect of different post-
harvest treatments and storage conditions on the fruit quality of kinnow. Journal
Uppal, D. S. 1999. Effect of storage environments on chip colour and sugar levels in
tubers of potato cultivars. Journal of Food Science and Technology 36(6): 545-
547.
van der Sman, R. G. M. 2003. Simple model for estimating heat and mass transfer in
on shelf life and quality of pomegranate in evaporative cool chamber and ambient
29
Table 1. Characteristic length dc for regular-shaped objects in the linear driving force
approximation.
30
Table 3. Parameters of the clay pot shown in Fig. 1.
31
Table 4. Results of the steady-state evaporative cooling experiments with the clay pot
containing water.
Replicate #1
Replicate #2
Average
32
Table 5. Observed cooling effect under tropical conditions with the prototypical ECC
shown in Fig. 3.
Timea Tamb (°°C) RHamb (%) Twater (°°C) Tamb – Twater (°°C)
33
List of Figures
Figure 1. (a) Photograph of the small clay pot used in the evaporative cooling
experiments, and (b) schematic diagram of the clay pot (dimensions are given in Table 3).
evaporative cooling experiments with the clay pot containing water were performed.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the prototypical ECC tested under tropical conditions.
Figure 4. Variation of the ratio of the external mass and heat transfer coefficients of the
clay pot containing water with ambient relative humidity under steady-state conditions
Figure 5. Variation of the external mass transfer coefficient of the clay pot containing
water with ambient relative humidity under steady-state conditions (Tamb = 22.8–23.4 °C).
Figure 6. Variation of the steady-state equilibrium temperature of the clay pot containing
Figure 7. Transient central temperature of the clay pot containing water as a function of
time at a ramp rate of 0.5% RH/min [RHi = 60%, RHf = 15%, Tamb = 22.3 °C, mwater =
(23.369 g + 21.848 g)/2 = 22.609 g]. For the simple model, hint = 1.817 × 10-3 W/(cm2 K).
Figure 8. Transient central temperature of the clay pot containing water as a function of
time at a ramp rate of 1% RH/min [RHi = 60%, RHf = 15%, Tamb = 22.2 °C, mwater =
(25.239 g + 24.009 g)/2 = 24.624 g]. For the simple model, hint = 1.817 × 10-3 W/(cm2 K).
34
(a)
Styrofoam lid
rcyl
rtop lcyl
hf
rbot
(b)
Figure 1. (a) Photograph of the small clay pot used in the evaporative cooling
experiments, and (b) schematic diagram of the clay pot (dimensions are given in Table
3).
Electronic
balance
35
Computer Compressed air
Balance Dry
air Dryer
DAV
Motor
H
Humid
air Pump
Trap
WAV
S C S
P Room air
Humidifier
Mixed air
C Clay pot with water
DAV Dry air valve
H Humidity sensor
P Pan
S Screen
WAV Wet air valve
36
Copper vessel wrapped with a
piece of wet cloth
Wooden board
Fan Fan
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the prototypical ECC tested under tropical conditions.
37
580
From expt. data and Eq. (17)
Eq. (25)
530
kf,ext /hext [K cm /J]
3
480
y = 4.941x + 264.517
2
R = 0.960
430
380
330
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
RH amb (%)
Figure 4. Variation of the ratio of the external mass and heat transfer coefficients of
the clay pot containing water with ambient relative humidity under steady-state
conditions (Tamb = 22.8–23.4 °C).
38
1.10
From expt. data and Eq. (18)
1.00
Eq. (24)
0.90
kf,ext (cm/s)
0.80
y = 0.014x + 0.203
0.70 2
R = 0.984
0.60
0.50
0.40
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
RH amb (%)
Figure 5. Variation of the external mass transfer coefficient of the clay pot containing
water with ambient relative humidity under steady-state conditions (Tamb = 22.8–23.4
°C).
39
19
expt. data
Eq. (34)
18
17
Teq (C)
y = 0.085x + 13.369
2
R = 0.977
16
15
14
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
RH amb (%)
40
20 Expt. data
van der Sman's model
19 Simple model
18
Tcntr (C)
17
16
15
14
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
t (min)
Figure 7. Transient central temperature of the clay pot containing water as a function
of time at a ramp rate of 0.5% RH/min [RHi = 60%, RHf = 15%, Tamb = 22.3 °C, mwater
= (23.369 g + 21.848 g)/2 = 22.609 g]. For the simple model, hint = 1.817 × 10-3
W/(cm2 K).
41
20 Expt. data
van der Sman's model
19 Simple model
18
Tcntr (C)
17
16
15
14
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
t (min)
Figure 8. Transient central temperature of the clay pot containing water as a function
of time at a ramp rate of 1% RH/min [RHi = 60%, RHf = 15%, Tamb = 22.2 °C, mwater =
(25.239 g + 24.009 g)/2 = 24.624 g]. For the simple model, hint = 1.817 × 10-3 W/(cm2
K).
42